Upload
mariah-riley
View
215
Download
1
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Value chain analysis general overview
• Some reminders• Software has a high development cost• But production cost almost nil
• Automotive software specifics• “software as a product” almost does not exist for automotive.
– sale of software mostly associated to some hardware– Cost of software mostly based on estimates of development costs– Specific business model for software at the exploratory stage– The liability issue as an important factor
• Relatively small programs, with strong hardware expertise needed – 500 000 lines of codes for the powertrain software compared to 6 millions for
a Linux kernel.– A major exception : infotainment up to 7 million lines of code
• A key constraint: need to limit software development costs
28 April 2010
Software development
Who are the software developers ?
OEM : specify and develop software considered as critical (may subcontract)
Tier 1 : specify and develop application software (or more for low cost cars : AVL,…)
Semi suppliers : hardware related software
Tool and software suppliers : develop software (mostly subcontracts), but also modelisation, simulation and test
APE 28 April 2010
Process, Quality and Supplier Management, Functional SafetyProcess, Quality and Supplier Management, Functional Safety
Center E/E and Software Technologies Core Competencies
ImplementationImplementation
Modeling and Analysis
Modeling and Analysis
Requirements Engineering
Requirements Engineering
Integration and TestingIntegration and Testing
E/E BasicTechnologies
Architecture andSystem Design
AUTOSAR: a major development
• A major step– No other industry has such level of standardization been accepted so widely
– A major impact starting now
• AUTOSAR defines– Software architecture
– Development methodology
– Programming interfaces (API)
• A consortium– Following ITEA project East-Eaa (2001-2004)
– AUTOSAR 4.0 available end 2009
• Main benefits: competitive advantage– Allows for software re-use, software which is already proven: reduces development
costs and decreases risk factor
– Avoids multiple development for different ECUs (20% to 30% of powertrain software)
– Facilitates for an OEM to have multiple providers, while keeping a common interface
– Contributes to costs reduction
APE 28 April 2010