Upload
coby-riley
View
20
Download
4
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Value-added education and substance use. Wolf Markham Paul Aveyard Sherri Bisset. Talk outline. Outline of the theory Application of the theory. Basis of theory. The application of - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
Value-added education and substance use
Wolf MarkhamWolf Markham
Paul AveyardPaul Aveyard
Sherri BissetSherri Bisset
School of Health and Social Studies, University of Warwick
Talk outline
Outline of the theoryOutline of the theory
Application of the theoryApplication of the theory
School of Health and Social Studies, University of Warwick
Basis of theoryThe application of The application of
Nussbaum’s Aristotelian interpretation of good Nussbaum’s Aristotelian interpretation of good human functioning which includes a focus of human functioning which includes a focus of fundamental human needs and essential human fundamental human needs and essential human capacities capacities
Bernstein’s influential theory of cultural transmission Bernstein’s influential theory of cultural transmission
School of Health and Social Studies, University of Warwick
Bernstein's theory of cultural transmission
Instructional orderInstructional order
Regulatory orderRegulatory order
School of Health and Social Studies, University of Warwick
Instructional order
Focuses on ability of pupils to contribute to future Focuses on ability of pupils to contribute to future production through workproduction through work
Aims are to relay knowledge and skills and influence Aims are to relay knowledge and skills and influence pupils’ orientations to meaningpupils’ orientations to meaning
School of Health and Social Studies, University of Warwick
Regulatory order
Focuses on the conduct, character and manner of Focuses on the conduct, character and manner of pupilspupils
Aims to relay values and thus facilitate the Aims to relay values and thus facilitate the attachment of pupils’ to the school and the attachment of pupils’ to the school and the internalisation of the values and beliefs of the schoolinternalisation of the values and beliefs of the school
School of Health and Social Studies, University of Warwick
What influences pupils’ response to the two orders
Socio-cultural origins of the pupilSocio-cultural origins of the pupil Pupils’ friendship groupsPupils’ friendship groups Pupils expectations including expected future Pupils expectations including expected future
occupation occupation Pupils’ hopes and interestsPupils’ hopes and interests Pupils’ view of the purpose of the schoolPupils’ view of the purpose of the school School cultureSchool culture Schools’ valuesSchools’ values Schools’ hope and expectationsSchools’ hope and expectations
School of Health and Social Studies, University of Warwick
Classification and framing
Classification refers to boundariesClassification refers to boundaries
Framing refers to communicationFraming refers to communication
School of Health and Social Studies, University of Warwick
Strongly classified and framed school
Strong boundaries within school and between the Strong boundaries within school and between the school and the outside worldschool and the outside world
High degree of specialism of teachers and subjectsHigh degree of specialism of teachers and subjects
Celebrated hierarchies within pupil population based Celebrated hierarchies within pupil population based on e.g. age, academic attainment and sporting on e.g. age, academic attainment and sporting prowessprowess
Little pupil input into running of schoolLittle pupil input into running of school
School of Health and Social Studies, University of Warwick
Pedagogy Teachers are viewed as the primary source of Teachers are viewed as the primary source of
knowledgeknowledge
The pedagogic practice focuses on the learnerThe pedagogic practice focuses on the learner
The overriding concern of schooling is the The overriding concern of schooling is the instructional order and the main focus of the instructional order and the main focus of the regulatory order is to facilitate the learnerregulatory order is to facilitate the learner
School of Health and Social Studies, University of Warwick
Weakly classified and weakly framed school
School has strong links with the communities it School has strong links with the communities it serves and with outside agenciesserves and with outside agencies
Pupils involved in school-level decision making Pupils involved in school-level decision making
Integrated curriculumIntegrated curriculum
School of Health and Social Studies, University of Warwick
Pedagogy Pupils are viewed as sources of knowledgePupils are viewed as sources of knowledge
Pupils encouraged to think that there are different Pupils encouraged to think that there are different ways of knowingways of knowing
Greater input into the selection pacing and Greater input into the selection pacing and sequencing of classroom activitiessequencing of classroom activities
School of Health and Social Studies, University of Warwick
Two studies provide the data TTM-based smoking prevention/ cessation trial (1997-1999)TTM-based smoking prevention/ cessation trial (1997-1999)
8352 adolescents in 52 schools8352 adolescents in 52 schools aged 13-14 at baseline (Year 9)aged 13-14 at baseline (Year 9) 89.1% followed up one year later89.1% followed up one year later 84.6% followed up two years later84.6% followed up two years later 3 computerised interventions in Year 93 computerised interventions in Year 9
Cross-sectional study- West Midlands Young People’s Cross-sectional study- West Midlands Young People’s Lifestyle Survey (YPLS) 1995/6Lifestyle Survey (YPLS) 1995/6 25,781 pupils in 166 secondary schools25,781 pupils in 166 secondary schools Years 7 (11-12), 9 (13-14), and 11 (15-16)Years 7 (11-12), 9 (13-14), and 11 (15-16)
School of Health and Social Studies, University of Warwick
Measuring school culture?
Predicting the 5 A-Cs ratePredicting the 5 A-Cs rate
Predicting the truancy ratePredicting the truancy rate
Gender, deprivation (Townsend, FSM, housing Gender, deprivation (Townsend, FSM, housing tenure), ethnicitytenure), ethnicity
School of Health and Social Studies, University of Warwick
Difference actual - predicted a-c
6543210-1-2
Diffe
ren
ce
actu
al-
pre
dic
ted
un
au
th a
bs
2
1
0
-1
-2
-3
-4
scholl culture 2
Indeterminate
Alienated
Committed
School of Health and Social Studies, University of Warwick
Proportion entitled to free school meals
1.0.8.6.4.20.0
Pro
po
rtio
n o
wn
er
occu
pie
rs1.0
.8
.6
.4
.2
0.0
Indeterminate
Alienated
Committed
School of Health and Social Studies, University of Warwick
OR (95%CI) OR (95%CI 2, df, p
Base modelb
Achievement terms 5A-C Truancy
Base model + observed achievement scores
0.96 (0.91-1.02)d
0.97 (0.89-1.06)e
2.4, 2, 0.30
Base model + observed achievement scores + pupil-level risk factorsc
1.01 (0.95-1.07)d
1.01 (0.92-1.10)e
0.2, 2, 0.91
Value-added (support and control) terms High Low
Base model + school culture 0.80 (0.70-0.91)
1.16 (1.07-1.27)
11.6, 1, <0.001
Base model + school culture + pupil-level risk factorsc
0.83 (0.73-0.95)
1.13 (1.04-1.24)
7.9, 1, 0.005
School of Health and Social Studies, University of Warwick
Does school culture influence pupils’ smoking?
Committing OR(95%CI)
Alienating OR(95%CI)
2, p forculture*
Unadjusted
0.71 (0.53-0.95) 1.13 (0.96-1.34) 8.1, 0.0044
Adjusted 0.76 (0.58-1.01) 1.24 (1.05-1.47) 11.2, <0.001* 2df† adjusted for age, ethnicity, gender, maternal smoking,paternal smoking, sibling smoking, deprivation,
School of Health and Social Studies, University of Warwick
Replication of the value-added terms in the trial data
OR (95% confidence interval) for a 1SD increase in OR (95% confidence interval) for a 1SD increase in value-added scorevalue-added score 0.85 (0.73 to 0.99)0.85 (0.73 to 0.99) at one year follow upat one year follow up 0.80 (0.71 to 0.91) at two year follow up0.80 (0.71 to 0.91) at two year follow up
These effects lead to 27% fewer smokers in high These effects lead to 27% fewer smokers in high value-added vs. low value-added at 2 yearsvalue-added vs. low value-added at 2 years
School of Health and Social Studies, University of Warwick
Value-added effect smaller in those already smoking?
Very little evidence of thisVery little evidence of this At one year, At one year,
OR for value added term for baseline regular OR for value added term for baseline regular smokers=0.85 and 0.85 for baseline never smokerssmokers=0.85 and 0.85 for baseline never smokers
At two years,At two years, OR for value added term for baseline regular OR for value added term for baseline regular
smokers=0.87 and 0.79 for baseline never smokerssmokers=0.87 and 0.79 for baseline never smokers