Upload
izzy
View
57
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
VALIDITY vs. RELIABILITY by: Ivan Prasetya. Because of measuring the social phenomena is not easy like measuring the physical symptom and because there are a lot of MEASUREMENT ERROR in measuring social phenomena, so we should do VALIDITY & RELIABILITY TESTING. VALIDITY vs. RELIABILITY. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
VALIDITY vs. RELIABILITYby: Ivan Prasetya
Because of measuring the social phenomena is not easy like measuring the physical symptom and because there are a lot of MEASUREMENT ERROR in measuring social phenomena, so we should do VALIDITY & RELIABILITY TESTING.
VALIDITY vs. RELIABILITY
• Measurement VALIDITY:How well an empirical indicator and the conceptual definition of the construct that the indicator is suppose to measure ‘fit’ together.
• Measurement RELIABILITY:The independability or consistency of the measure of a variable.
Different tools are usedfor measuring different things
A tape measure is used tomeasure length or distance.
A thermometer is used tomeasure temperature.
A stopwatch is used tomeasure time.
If we want to measure weight/mass,we can use these tools:
Digital scale have the highest VALIDITY.
(1 litre = 1 kg)
However, even though a digital scale has the highest validity, but if the subject is not
cooperative, the test result will not be accurate:
If you keep jumping around whilemeasuring your weight, you won'tget an accurate result of your bodyweight.
And if you carry extra loads whilestepping on a digital scale, youwon't get an accurate result ofyour body weight either.
High Validity, Low Reliability
VALIDITY vs. RELIABILITY
Low Reliability,High Reliability, High Reliability,Low Validity Low Validity High Validity
GOODNESS OF MEASURES
GOODNESS OF DATA
RELIABILITY (Accuracy in
measurement)
VALIDITY (Are we measuring
the right thing?)
STABILITY
CONSISTENCY
TEST-RETEST RELIABILITY
PARALLEL-FORM RELIABILITY
INTERITEM CONSISTENCY RELIABILITY
SPLIT –HALF RELIABILITY
LOGICAL VALIDITY (CONTENT)
CONGRUENT VALIDITY (CONSTRUCT))
CRITERION-RELATED VALIDITY
FACE VALIDITYPREDICTIVE
CONCURENT
CONVERGENT
DISCRIMINANT
RELIABILITY
• Indicates the extent to which the measure is without bias (error free) and hence offers consistent measurement across time and across the various items in the instrument.
• In other words, the reliability of measure indicates the stability and consistency with which the instrument measures the concept and helps to assess the “goodness” of measure.
STABILITY OF MEASURES
TEST-RETEST RELIABILITY
The Reliability coefficientobtained with a
repetitionof the same measure on
asecond occasion.
PARALLEL-FORM RELIABILITY
When responses on twocomparable sets ofmeasures tapping the
sameconstruct are highlycorrelated.
TEST-RETEST RELIABILITY
If infrastructure in the country is not good, your company will cancel your decision to do Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) in that following country.
Answer (now): strongly disagree
Answer (20 days later): agree
Low Reliability
PARALLEL-FORM RELIABILITY
Do you think that Susi Similikiti is beautiful?Answer: YES
Do you think that Tukul’s wife is beautiful?Answer: NO
Fact: Susi Similikiti is Tukul’s wife.
Low Reliability
CONSISTENCY
INTERITEM CONSISTENCY
This the test of theconsistency of
respondents’answer to all the items in
themeasure.
SPLIT-HALF RELIABILITY
Reflecting the correlations
between two halves of an
instrument.
PROBLEMS and PITFALLin VALIDITY
VALIDITY in QUESTIONAIRE DESIGN
• How diligent are you?5 = very diligent4 = diligent3 = indifferent2 = lazy1 = very lazy
Because respondents have to evaluate themselves, they tend to choose number (4) and (5), or at least number (3).
Low Validity
To measure the degree of diligent(as a student),
we also can use this questionaire:
• How much time do you spend to learn everyday?• How many books do you read every week?• How often do you go to library every week?
The answer which revealed from questionaire above will tend to be more accurate to measure the degree of diligent.
High Validity
Avoid question that ask two things at once, you won’t know which ‘bit’ people are answering:
Low Validity
Avoid ambiguity:
Apakah kalian sudah membeli buku sejarah demokrasi yang baru?
Apanya yang baru???Bukunya...???Sejarahnya...???Atau...Demokrasinya???
Low Validity
Avoid jargon/abbreviations/slang:
Higher number of current GDP in a country will encourage your company to do more FDI in that country.
Higher number of current Per capita Income in a country will make your company do more FDI in that country.
If the level of corruption in a country increased, your company will reduce their amount of FDI in that country.
Low Validity
Avoid not mutually exclusive options:
I’m 20 years old now.
What age are you? 16-20 20-25 25-30 35-40
Low Validity
Problems and Pitfalls
• Avoid making questionnaire too long
• Typographical / spelling errors
Low Validity
Using SPSS
Analyze >>> Scale >>> ReliabilityScale If item delete >>> Continue >>> OK
If Corrected Item-Total Correlation > r-table:VALID
If Cronbach’s Alpha if item deleted > r-table:RELIABEL
Using SPSS
Item-Total Statistics Scale Mean if Item Deleted Scale Variance if Item Deleted
Corrected Item-Total Correlation
Cronbach's Alpha if Item Deleted
VAR1.1.1 152,7333 249,0299 0,2785 0,9368
VAR1.1.2 153,2667 244,7540 0,3568 0,9366
VAR1.1.3 153,0333 249,5506 0,3113 0,9364
VAR1.1.4 152,9667 246,9989 0,4354 0,9357
VAR1.1.5 153,2000 248,1655 0,3300 0,9364
VAR1.1.6 153,9000 245,6793 0,4432 0,9356
VAR1.1.7 154,0667 246,0644 0,4555 0,9356
VAR1.1.8 154,1667 241,3851 0,5454 0,9349
VAR1.1.9 153,7000 245,7345 0,3929 0,9361
THANK YOU!!!