14
Validation of Open Inguinal Hernia Repair Simulation Model A Randomised Controlled Educational Trial Khatib M, Hald N, Brenton H, Sarker S, Standfield N, Ziprin P, Kneebone R, Bello F Imperial College London Association for Surgical Education Surgical Education Week 24 th April 2013

Validation of Open Inguinal Hernia Repair Simulation Model A Randomised Controlled Educational Trial Khatib M, Hald N, Brenton H, Sarker S, Standfield

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Validation of Open Inguinal Hernia Repair Simulation Model A Randomised Controlled Educational Trial Khatib M, Hald N, Brenton H, Sarker S, Standfield

Validation of Open Inguinal Hernia Repair Simulation Model A Randomised Controlled Educational Trial

Khatib M, Hald N, Brenton H, Sarker S, Standfield N, Ziprin P, Kneebone R, Bello F

Imperial College London

Validation of Open Inguinal Hernia Repair Simulation Model A Randomised Controlled Educational Trial

Khatib M, Hald N, Brenton H, Sarker S, Standfield N, Ziprin P, Kneebone R, Bello F

Imperial College London

Association for Surgical Education

Surgical Education Week

24th April 2013

Page 2: Validation of Open Inguinal Hernia Repair Simulation Model A Randomised Controlled Educational Trial Khatib M, Hald N, Brenton H, Sarker S, Standfield

Introduction• Surgical simulation brought to the forefront of

surgical training– Technological advances– Importance of surgical safety– Limitation in surgical trainee exposure

• EWTD• Duty hour restrictions

• Abundance of laparoscopic/ endovascular simulators

• Development of Hernia Repair Open Surgical Simulation (HeROSS) model

Page 3: Validation of Open Inguinal Hernia Repair Simulation Model A Randomised Controlled Educational Trial Khatib M, Hald N, Brenton H, Sarker S, Standfield

Recruitment

Clinical Years Medical students invited to participate

Volunteers screened

Exclusion criteria implemented

Block Randomisation

Pre-intervention MCQ

Intervention Group

Group 4:

Control Group

Group 1:

Interactive Simulation

Group 2:

Non-interactive Simulation

Group 3:

Video Tutorial

Assessment

1. Post-intervention MCQ

2. Viva

Method

Performing or assisting in an open inguinal hernia repair

Previous bachelor degree in anatomy

Anatomy demonstrator

Page 4: Validation of Open Inguinal Hernia Repair Simulation Model A Randomised Controlled Educational Trial Khatib M, Hald N, Brenton H, Sarker S, Standfield

Method• Three separate one hour learning sessions

• Scenario given to candidates

• All in one week

• Assessment one day after final learning session

Page 5: Validation of Open Inguinal Hernia Repair Simulation Model A Randomised Controlled Educational Trial Khatib M, Hald N, Brenton H, Sarker S, Standfield

Method• Interactive Simulation

Page 6: Validation of Open Inguinal Hernia Repair Simulation Model A Randomised Controlled Educational Trial Khatib M, Hald N, Brenton H, Sarker S, Standfield

Method• Video Tutorial

Page 7: Validation of Open Inguinal Hernia Repair Simulation Model A Randomised Controlled Educational Trial Khatib M, Hald N, Brenton H, Sarker S, Standfield

Method• Control Group

– Internet access– Quick access to all surgical procedure

textbooks and mini-textbooks available in Imperial College Library

– Anatomy handouts from commonly used anatomy textbooks and atlases

Page 8: Validation of Open Inguinal Hernia Repair Simulation Model A Randomised Controlled Educational Trial Khatib M, Hald N, Brenton H, Sarker S, Standfield

Results

Page 9: Validation of Open Inguinal Hernia Repair Simulation Model A Randomised Controlled Educational Trial Khatib M, Hald N, Brenton H, Sarker S, Standfield

Results• 54 students completed study

• Group 1 n=15• Group 2 n=15• Group 3 n=12• Group 4 n=14

Page 10: Validation of Open Inguinal Hernia Repair Simulation Model A Randomised Controlled Educational Trial Khatib M, Hald N, Brenton H, Sarker S, Standfield

Results

 

Group Mean Standard Deviation

Pre Intervention MCQ

(%)

1 43.33 13.282 38.92 9.933 38.33 9.374 39.57 9.27

Total 40.14 10.58

Score Improvement in MCQ

(%)

1 30.15 13.682 36.08 12.483 31.74 12.874 7.41 9.56

Total 26.4 16.41

Assessment Score(%)

1 76.92 9.92 65.38 2.723 59.67 8.864 42.93 9.54

Total 61.63 14.88

Page 11: Validation of Open Inguinal Hernia Repair Simulation Model A Randomised Controlled Educational Trial Khatib M, Hald N, Brenton H, Sarker S, Standfield

Results – Comparison Between Groups

Page 12: Validation of Open Inguinal Hernia Repair Simulation Model A Randomised Controlled Educational Trial Khatib M, Hald N, Brenton H, Sarker S, Standfield

Conclusions• Statistically significant Improvement in

anatomical and procedural knowledge from using the interactive simulation model

• Vital role of simulation as an adjunct in modern surgical training

• Open surgical procedural knowledge a pre-requisite to laparoscopic surgery

• Envisage online virtual theatre with ability to do multiple core index procedures

Page 13: Validation of Open Inguinal Hernia Repair Simulation Model A Randomised Controlled Educational Trial Khatib M, Hald N, Brenton H, Sarker S, Standfield

Future Research• Recruitment of surgical trainees

ongoing• Addition of recorded assessment on

hernia model

Page 14: Validation of Open Inguinal Hernia Repair Simulation Model A Randomised Controlled Educational Trial Khatib M, Hald N, Brenton H, Sarker S, Standfield

Thank you