8
Validating the mathematical model of the Fracture Failure Assessment Diagram (FAD) 2315 PRAC III Investigation of Brittle Burst FAD Tensil e NACE A DCB Mini- Pipe Full Size Pipe Can we gather characterization test data on a pipe and input this information in the FAD equations and predict tubular Failure Pressure in an H 2 S Sour Environment? HRC CVN

Validating the mathematical model of the Fracture Failure Assessment Diagram (FAD) Validating the mathematical model of the Fracture Failure Assessment

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Validating the mathematical model of the Fracture Failure Assessment Diagram (FAD) Validating the mathematical model of the Fracture Failure Assessment

Validating the mathematical model of the Fracture Failure Assessment Diagram (FAD)Validating the mathematical model of the Fracture Failure Assessment Diagram (FAD)

2315 PRAC III Investigation of Brittle Burst FAD

2315 PRAC III Investigation of Brittle Burst FAD

TensileTensile NACE ANACE A DCBDCB

Mini-PipeMini-PipeFull Size Pipe

Can we gather characterization test data on a pipe and input this information in the FAD equations and predicttubular Failure Pressure in an H2S Sour Environment?

Can we gather characterization test data on a pipe and input this information in the FAD equations and predicttubular Failure Pressure in an H2S Sour Environment?

HRCHRC CVNCVN

Page 2: Validating the mathematical model of the Fracture Failure Assessment Diagram (FAD) Validating the mathematical model of the Fracture Failure Assessment

PRAC III : 3 Test Samples from One Pipe

AB TCII Premium Threads Applied

Heavy Duty End Caps with AB TCII

Premium ThreadsApplied to the Test Sample

With Make-up Torque Control

UT Inspection (2% calibration notch)

20%x0.010”x42” milled notchpasses thru min. wall at center20%x0.010”x42” milled notchpasses thru min. wall at center

54 in.54 in. 54 in.

Analysis fulfilled all API C110 chemical requirements.

Page 3: Validating the mathematical model of the Fracture Failure Assessment Diagram (FAD) Validating the mathematical model of the Fracture Failure Assessment

PRAC III : 3 Test Samples from One Pipe

Test Samples Ready for Shipmen

Page 4: Validating the mathematical model of the Fracture Failure Assessment Diagram (FAD) Validating the mathematical model of the Fracture Failure Assessment

Tiny Pipe Testing• The committee questioned the refresh rate of 3 times

a week. With a 7% NACE-A Solution the H2S depletion rate may require a much higher refresh frequency.

EDM OD NotchEDM OD Notch

~ 4 inches~ 4 inches

Page 5: Validating the mathematical model of the Fracture Failure Assessment Diagram (FAD) Validating the mathematical model of the Fracture Failure Assessment

From: "Ellis, Peter F" <[email protected]>To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>, Xin Long <[email protected]>, Date: 11/15/2012 06:16 PMSubject: Result of the Tiny pipe H2S Depletion Study.

Pete, Xin,On Tuesday, 11/13, we charged a fresh tiny pipe with NACE Solution D containing 85.15 ppm H2S and locked it in. We collected and the contents of the tiny pipe 4.05 hours later and measured an H2S concentration of 51.09 ppm, a decrease of 40% over 4 hours.

We then charged the same tiny pipe with NACE Solution A saturated with H2S for 17.72 hours.

The tiny pipe was flushed with distilled water and charged with NACE Solution D containing 170.3 ppm H2S. After 4.05 hours the H2S concentration was 68.12 ppm, a decrease of 60%.

We were not able to collect enough solution to measure both the H2S level and the pH.Peter F. Ellis IIEngineering Team Leader, CorrosionHoneywell Corrosion Solutions11201 Greens Crossing Blvd, Suite 700 Houston, TX 77067

Page 6: Validating the mathematical model of the Fracture Failure Assessment Diagram (FAD) Validating the mathematical model of the Fracture Failure Assessment

H2S Depletion Test with 5% H2S NACE A Solution

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

200

0 1 2 3 4 5 6Time (hours)

H2S

Con

cent

ratio

n (p

pm)

With 17 Hour Pre-soak in 100% NACE-A Solution60% Decrease In 4 hours

No Pre-soak40% Decrease In 4 hours

Page 7: Validating the mathematical model of the Fracture Failure Assessment Diagram (FAD) Validating the mathematical model of the Fracture Failure Assessment

Load and ID Refresh Schedule

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

110

120

130

140

150

160

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20

Time in Days

% K

limit

Inte

rnal

Pre

ssur

e

100%NACE-A

7%NACE-A

Proposed Tiny Pipe

Page 8: Validating the mathematical model of the Fracture Failure Assessment Diagram (FAD) Validating the mathematical model of the Fracture Failure Assessment

In a 100% Saturated NACE-A Solution

What we need is Klimit for a 7% NACE-A Solution

Tenaris