6
1 Rationale: Experts-based workshop and/or cliniquing is vital to the enhancement and further articulation of the proposed program and course offerings of SEARSOLIN. The output of the workshop is envisioned to address the need for the holistic and dynamic processing of the programs offerings. It shall also provide an in- depth and thorough assessment of its viability, thematic orientation, impact and relevance to the envisioned re-articulated and re-invention of SEARSOLIN as premier social leadership institute in this part of the world. Targeted Participants: Course Target Participants Food Security Select experts from College of Agriculture faculty members and extension officers as recommended by the Dean of the College of Agriculture; Partner Community, CSO (Kaanib Foundation) and Department of Agriculture Rights-based Resource and Governance Executive Director of XUCLA, Representatives from Balaod Mindanao Foundation, Recommended Alternative Lawyers from the Integrated Bar of the Philippines, and Partner Communities, SEARSOLIN Alumni, ELAC, HARIBON Local Governance Executive Director of GLI, Representatives from Civil Society Groups, LGUs, SEARSOLIN Alumni, Faculty from the Graduate School Public Administration Social Entrepreneurship Select experts, faculty and extension officers as recommended by the Dean of the College of Agriculture; School of Business and Management; Representatives from the Social Entrepreneurship Program, Partner Community, Department of Trade and Industry and Social Entrepreneurs in Cagayan de Oro Project Management, Monitoring and Evaluation (tools and skills) Partnership, Networking Select Experts of Program Management from International NGOs operating in the City/Region, Organizational Development Experts, Partner Community, Select Members of Civil Society Groups in the City, Quality Management Practitioners, Faculty from the School of Business and Management, and Graduate School-- Department of Development Management Overall Facilitator Must be an expert in Educational Management as Recommended by the Dean of the School of Education Proposed Cliniquing / Workshop on the Re-invented Program and Course Offerings of SEARSOLIN

V1_searsolin Proposed Cliniquing - Workshops for Program Offerings

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

searsolin

Citation preview

Page 1: V1_searsolin Proposed Cliniquing - Workshops for Program Offerings

1

Rationale: Experts-based workshop and/or cliniquing is vital to the enhancement and further articulation of the proposed program and course offerings of SEARSOLIN. The output of the workshop is envisioned to address the need for the holistic and dynamic processing of the programs offerings. It shall also provide an in-depth and thorough assessment of its viability, thematic orientation, impact and relevance to the envisioned re-articulated and re-invention of SEARSOLIN as premier social leadership institute in this part of the world.

Targeted Participants:

Course Target Participants

Food Security Select experts from College of Agriculture faculty members and extension officers as recommended by the Dean of the College of Agriculture; Partner Community, CSO (Kaanib Foundation) and Department of Agriculture

Rights-based Resource and Governance

Executive Director of XUCLA, Representatives from Balaod Mindanao Foundation, Recommended Alternative Lawyers from the Integrated Bar of the Philippines, and Partner Communities, SEARSOLIN Alumni, ELAC, HARIBON

Local Governance Executive Director of GLI, Representatives from Civil Society Groups, LGUs, SEARSOLIN Alumni, Faculty from the Graduate School Public Administration

Social Entrepreneurship

Select experts, faculty and extension officers as recommended by the Dean of the College of Agriculture; School of Business and Management; Representatives from the Social Entrepreneurship Program, Partner Community, Department of Trade and Industry and Social Entrepreneurs in Cagayan de Oro

Project Management, Monitoring and Evaluation (tools and skills) Partnership, Networking

Select Experts of Program Management from International NGOs operating in the City/Region, Organizational Development Experts, Partner Community, Select Members of Civil Society Groups in the City, Quality Management Practitioners, Faculty from the School of Business and Management, and Graduate School--Department of Development Management

Overall Facilitator Must be an expert in Educational Management as Recommended by the Dean of the School of Education

Proposed Cliniquing / Workshop on the Re-invented Program and Course Offerings of SEARSOLIN

Page 2: V1_searsolin Proposed Cliniquing - Workshops for Program Offerings

2

Settling down Recap of the Previous Workshop Output Analysis of the present program and training offerings Workshop on Evaluation, Analysis and Needs Assessment of the Proposed

Program and Training Offerings of SEARSOLIN vis-a-vis Present Integrative Developmental Needs and Priorities of the Targeted Students and Beneficiaries, Development Agenda of Asia Pacific Region

Identification of proposed new program offerings, courses, and other services of SEARSOLIN.

Identification of Internal and External Resources Needed to Ensure Total Quality Management of the Programs and Training Offerings

Synthesis

Preliminaries. The facilitator will present the rationale, objectives and flow of the workshop. Recap of the previous workshop output will be presented and serve as a link in the workshop.

Present the proposed program and training offerings Analysis and workshop will be facilitated by the facilitator. Workshop on Evaluation Analysis and Needs Assessment of the Present Program and

Training Offerings of SEARSOLIN vis-avis Present Integrative Developmental Needs and Priorities of the Targeted Students and Beneficiaries, Development Agenda of Asia Pacific Region, etc.

Proposed Workshop Points for consideration1: Identify educational methodologies, faculty development resources, potential

funding resources, and opportunities for dissemination of the curriculum Framework for needs identification:

Expectations of society from graduate students are viewed from one perspective. For example, according to the European Qualifications Framework graduate students should possess following performances:

1 Farid Ljuca, Srdjan Lozo, Vladimir Simunovic, Hans-Martin Bosse, Martina Kadmon. Chapter 11: Curriculum Development. Can http://www.bhmed-emanual.org/book/export/html/93 accessed 7 May 2013.

Mechanics

:

Page 3: V1_searsolin Proposed Cliniquing - Workshops for Program Offerings

3

The descriptors

Knowledge and understanding

Application of knowledge and understanding

Ability to making judgments

Ability to communicate

Learning skills

Level depending on the cycle Curriculum Development Processing According to Kern it is possible to use a

six-step approach to curriculum development:

3.1. Problem identification and general needs assessment. The goal of step 1 is to focus the curriculum, by defining the deficits in knowledge, attitude, or skills that currently exist in practitioners and the ideal approach to teaching and learning these objectives.

3.2. Needs assessment of targeted learners. The general needs assessment is applied to targeted learners who will be educated depends mostly on social needs but will also reflect job opportunities, financial rewards and attitudes acquired during process of study.

3.3. Goals and objectives. Institution should define overall goals and aims for the curriculum. Specific measurable knowledge, skill/ performance, attitude, and process objectives should be stated for the curriculum.

Catalogue Of Learning Skills And Objectives. Very important step is identification of attributes expected of graduates. Once these attributes are identified, educators must translate them into meaningful learning objectives.

3.4. Educational strategies. It is necessary to make a plan how to maximize the impact of the curriculum, which content should be included, how content should be organized and with which educational methods, how elements of curriculum should communicate, what kind of educational environment and climate should be developed. Content which is included must provide to student critical thinking.

3.5. Implementation. A plan for implementation, including timelines and resources required, should be created. A plan for faculty development is made to assure consistent implementation.

Management of curriculum implementation. Clear responsibility of certain bodies, committees and individuals should be one of key elements in the process of curriculum implementation. Role of the students in process of curriculum management should be clearly defined. The committee for coordination among courses in order to synchronize objectives of courses and overall curriculum should be established. Clear feedback on student requests should be defined.

Page 4: V1_searsolin Proposed Cliniquing - Workshops for Program Offerings

4

Teaching environment. Very important aspect of successful implementation of curriculum is teaching environment and fact whether the atmosphere inside the institution is encouraging for the people with ideas, initiatives and cooperation among students. It is desirable to establish a sort of “department of curriculum development”.

3.5.1. Relation between departments. One of the obstacles which may occur in process of curricular change is organizational structure of institution. Too much independent departures with huge level of autonomy can be problem in case that we want to implement curriculum which ask for strong inter-relations and cooperation’s among departments. Sharing of financial and all other funds which are available for the curricular reform can be one of the reasons for misunderstanding between departments. It has been found that strong collaboration among departments is one of the preconditions for successful curricular reform.

3.5.2. Organization of course. Organization of courses inside curriculum must be done in accordance with the needs which are derived from the mission statement of the institution.

Finding of appropriate ratio between different subjects in aspects of time and quantity of number of lessons and exercises is a special problem.

Definition and organization of the course inside curriculum include:

Defining of requirements for attending of teaching process from particular course

Course content Class timetables of contact hours, Learning and teaching methods Course credits and student workload Schedule of examinations, structure of examination, Compulsory and optional course elements Details of each component course, include: Learning outcomes, Objectives, syllabus, Assessment criteria, Reading lists (essential and background).

3.5.3. Teaching Methodologies. Teaching methods for certain course must be carefully selected. It has to provide to the students although having different habits the same possibilities for adoption of the knowledge. The methodology must be suitable to provide life-long learning and the capacity for the application of student’s knowledge in the practice. Methodologies can be selected according to the human and technical capacities of the institution. It has to respect educational philosophy of the institution. Modern educational institution follow student centered approach in their philosophy.

Page 5: V1_searsolin Proposed Cliniquing - Workshops for Program Offerings

5

3.5.4. Human resource development. In order to implement successfully new curriculum or reform old one it is essential to have staff trained who will be main force in curriculum implementation. Instruction should scan and predict special human needs in sense of qualification and knowledge necessary for better efficiency in their work.

3.6. Evaluation and feedback. Evaluation of curriculum presents the final stage inside cyclic process of improvement and development of curriculum. Evaluation of curriculum can be made through evaluation of many different aspects as:

Psychological and interpersonal skill Continuing learning Professional satisfaction Practice behaviour Educational achievement and cognitive development Institutional issues Student passing rates Making of clinical mistakes Clinical problem solving Educational cost per student Cost efficiency of graduates as practitioners

Proposed Matrix for Identification of New Program, Course and Service Offerings:

Organizational Vision

Organizational Mission

Targeted Students’ Profile / Background /

Desired Developmental Competencies &

Expertise, etc.

External Developmental Expectations & Learning Needs

(Current challenges, issues trends, etc. in

doing developmental / social leadership

work in the country and in Asia-Pacific)

Desired Graduates’ Skills

and Competencies

Key Responses (Programs,

Course Offering, and Other Services)

Resources Needed

This will be provided by the facilitator.

Page 6: V1_searsolin Proposed Cliniquing - Workshops for Program Offerings

6

Identification of Internal and External Resources Needed to Ensure Total Quality Management

of the Programs and Training Offerings will be facilitated using the Matrix below:

Proposed Program Offerings

Internal Resources External Resources Total Quality Management Mechanism

Synthesis. Output of the workshop will be presented for final validation and sharing of insights and reflections from the Committee is encouraged.