23
Application of Positron Annihilation for defects Application of Positron Annihilation for defects investigations in thin films investigations in thin films Outlook: Introduction to Positron Annihilation Methods Positron lifetime spectroscopy Doppler broadening spectroscopy Applications to thin films Slow positron beam Positron microscopy V. Bondarenko , R. Krause-Rehberg Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle, Germany PositronAnnihilation.net

V. Bondarenko, R. Krause-Rehberg Martin-Luther-University ...positron.physik.uni-halle.de/talks/ThinFilms_2003.pdfR. Krause-Rehberg et al., Appl. Phys. Lett. 77 (2000) 3932 V. Bondarenko,

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    4

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • Application of Positron Annihilation for defects investigations in thin films

    Application of Positron Annihilation for defects Application of Positron Annihilation for defects investigations in thin filmsinvestigations in thin films

    Outlook:Introduction to Positron AnnihilationMethods

    Positron lifetime spectroscopyDoppler broadening spectroscopy

    Applications to thin filmsSlow positron beamPositron microscopy

    V. Bondarenko, R. Krause-RehbergMartin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle, Germany

    PositronAnnihilation.net

  • V. Bondarenko, Martin-Luther-University, Halle, Germany

    Positron ā€“ the first discovered antiparticlePositron Positron ā€“ā€“ the first discovered antiparticlethe first discovered antiparticle

    D.A.M. Diracpredicted the existence of a positron in 1928 as an explanation of negative energy solutions of hisequation: Dirac D.A.M. (1928): Proc. Roy. Soc. 117, 610 (Nobel prize 1933)

    C.D. Anderson 1932 discovers positrons in a cosmic ray event ina Wilson cloud-chamberAnderson C.D. (1932): Science 76, 238 (Nobel prize 1936)

    1933 evidence of e+-e- pair formation by registration of annihilation Gamma quanta

    4222 cmcpE +Ā±=

  • V. Bondarenko, Martin-Luther-University, Halle, Germany

    Application of Positron AnnihilationApplication of Positron AnnihilationApplication of Positron Annihilation

    MaterialsCondensed matters (metals, semiconductors, polymersā€¦)LiquidsGases

    SensitivityVacancy-like defects and defect complexesConcentration limits 1014-1019 cm-3

    InformationType of vacancy-like defectsChemical surrounding of a vacancyVacancy-like defects depth profiling3D-imaging using micro-beam

    mm

    Ex: Laser hardening of Ck60-Steel

  • V. Bondarenko, Martin-Luther-University, Halle, Germany

    Positron in condensed matterPositron in condensed matterPositron in condensed matter

    Thermalizationenergy loss through electron/phonon excitation1 - 3 psPenetration depth ā‰ˆ E/Ļ

    DiffusionL+ ā‰ˆ 100 nmPositron wave function in [110] plane of GaAs

    e+

    e-

    Annihilationmainly with emittingof two Ī³-quanta

    %27.02/3 =Ī³Ī³

  • V. Bondarenko, Martin-Luther-University, Halle, Germany

    Sensitivity to electron momentumenergy and momentum conservation leads to

    angular correlation of annihilation radiationDoppler broadening of annihilation line

    Sensitivity to electron densityPositron Lifetime Spectroscopy (PALS)

    positron diffusion: during Ļ„b ā€“ positron bulk lifetime

    annihilation rate:

    2Ī³-annihilation22Ī³Ī³--annihilationannihilation

    Lpcmp 2/101 +=

    Lpcmp 2/102 āˆ’= pLppTĪøcmpT 0/ā‰…Ī˜

    rrr d)()(/1 0 Ī³ĻˆĻˆĻ€Ļ„Ī» āˆ’+āˆ«ā‹…ā‹…== crb

    p ā€“ momentum of e+-eā€“ pair

    p1, p2 ā€“ Ī³-quanta's momentum

    bDL Ļ„++ =

    the lower the electron density is, the higher is the positron lifetime

  • V. Bondarenko, Martin-Luther-University, Halle, Germany

    Positron trappingPositron trappingPositron trapping

    Perfect lattice (GaAs plane [110])

    Mono-vacancy

    Positrons are repelled by positive atom cores

    Vacancy represents a positron trap due to the missing nuclei (potential well for a positron)

    Positron Annihilation is sensitive to vacancy-like defects

    Because of reduced electron density positrons live longer in vacancies

  • V. Bondarenko, Martin-Luther-University, Halle, Germany

    Positron Annihilation Lifetime Spectroscopy (PALS)Positron Annihilation Lifetime Spectroscopy (PALS)Positron Annihilation Lifetime Spectroscopy (PALS)

    TechniqueĪ³-detection: scintillator + photomultiplierTime between positron penetration and

    itā€™s annihilation in a sample is measured3-6Ɨ106 are accumulated in a spectrum

    Mathematicsprobability n(t) that e+ is alive at time t:

    Ī» - positron annihilation ratePositron lifetime spectrum in bulk:

    t0

    Ī³

    Ī³

    )(d

    )(dntn

    tt

    Ī»āˆ’= 1)0( =n

    tbulketn Ī»āˆ’=)(

    bulkbulk Ļ„

    Ī»1

    =

    slope of the exponential decay

  • V. Bondarenko, Martin-Luther-University, Halle, Germany

    Positron Annihilation Lifetime SpectroscopyPositron Annihilation Lifetime SpectroscopyPositron Annihilation Lifetime Spectroscopy

    Physicsone-defect trapping model

    ā€¢ annihilation from bulk with Ī»b=1/Ļ„b s-1

    ā€¢ trapping to vacancy-defect with K s-1

    ā€¢ annihilation from the defect with Ī»d=1/Ļ„dā€¢ two-component lifetime spectrum

    Informationā€¢ vacancy type (mono-, di-, vacancy cluster)

    Ļ„2 ā€“ reflects the electron densityā€¢ defect concentration C

    trapping

    bulktrapping rate K

    1

    ddĪ» Ļ„

    =1

    bbĪ» Ļ„

    =

    annihilation

    1 1 1 2 2 2( ) / exp( / ) / exp( / )N t I t I tĻ„ Ļ„ Ļ„ Ļ„= āˆ’ + āˆ’

    i ii

    av IĻ„ Ļ„= āˆ‘

    CII

    Kb

    ā‰ˆ

    āˆ’=

    21

    2 11Ļ„Ļ„

  • V. Bondarenko, Martin-Luther-University, Halle, Germany

    Annihilation-Line Doppler broadening spectroscopyAnnihilationAnnihilation--Line Doppler broadening spectroscopyLine Doppler broadening spectroscopy

    Doppler effectelectron momentum in propagation direction of 511 keV Ī³-ray leads to Doppler broadening of annihilation line

    506 508 510 512 514 516 518 5200.0

    0.2

    0.4

    0.6

    0.8

    1.0 e+ annihilationin GaAs

    FWHM ā‰ˆ 2.6 keV

    85Sr

    FWHM = 1.4 keV

    Nor

    mal

    ized

    inte

    nsity

    Ī³ā€“ray energy [keV]

    E1-E2=pLcE1, E2 ā€“ energy of Ī³ quanta

    pL

    ppTĪø

    Ī³2

    Ī³1

    Technique

  • V. Bondarenko, Martin-Luther-University, Halle, Germany

    Annihilation-Line Doppler broadening spectroscopyAnnihilationAnnihilation--Line Doppler broadening spectroscopyLine Doppler broadening spectroscopy

    Data TreatmentLine Parameters

    ā€¢ ā€œShapeā€ parameter

    ā€¢ ā€œWingā€ parameter

    āˆ«+

    āˆ’

    ==s

    s

    EE

    EEDs

    s dENAAA

    S0

    0

    ,0

    āˆ«==2

    1

    ,0

    E

    EDw

    w dENAAA

    W

    InformationBoth S and W are sensitive to the concentration and defect typeW is sensative to chemical surrounding of the annihilation site, due to

    high momentum of core electrons participating in annihilation

  • V. Bondarenko, Martin-Luther-University, Halle, Germany

    Positron sourcePositron sourcePositron source

    Ī²-decay of radioactive isotopes

    0.5 %1340 keV12.8 hours64Cu

    99 %470 keV71 days58Co

    100 %545 keV2.6 years22Na

    Ī³-rays intensity

    Maximum energy

    half-lifeRadionuclide

    Energy distribution after Ī²+-decay Moderation

    Ļ…++ā†’ +eNeNa 22102211

    Ne2210

    Na2211Ļ„1/2 = 3.7 ps

    Ī²+ 0.06 %

    Ī²+ 90.4 %, EC 9.5 %

    Ī³ 1274 keV

  • V. Bondarenko, Martin-Luther-University, Halle, Germany

    Conventional positron beam techniqueConventional positron beam techniqueConventional positron beam technique

    Monoenergetic positrons are usedMagnetically guided

    Disadvantagesno simple lifetime measurements and bad lateral resolution (0.5-1 mm)defect studies by Doppler-broadening spectroscopycharacterization of defects only by line-shape parameters

    or positron diffusion length

  • V. Bondarenko, Martin-Luther-University, Halle, Germany

    āˆ’=

    āˆ’ m

    m

    m

    zz

    zmz

    EzP00

    1

    ),(

    Information from Doppler- broadening spectroscopyInformation from DopplerInformation from Doppler-- broadening spectroscopybroadening spectroscopy

    Positron implantation profileMakhov function:

    Ion implantation in Si

    0.92

    0.96

    0.96 0.98 1.00

    1.00

    1.04

    Mean positron depth (Āµm)

    Positron energy (keV)

    defect

    surface I

    surface II

    bulk

    B:Si 50, 150, 300 keV

    1Ā·10 cm14 -2 reference

    2Ā·10 cm16 -2

    0 10 20 30 40

    0 0.59 1.92 3.83 6.24

    S Pa

    ram

    eter

    W parameter

    S. Eichler, PhD Thesis, 1997

    S-E and S-W plots

    Positrons annihilation sites:ā€¢ surfaceā€¢ bulkā€¢ vacancy defect

  • V. Bondarenko, Martin-Luther-University, Halle, Germany

    Defect density as a function of deposited ion energyDefect density as a function of deposited ion energyDefect density as a function of deposited ion energy

    ā€¢ [defect] ~ dose0.5

    ā€¢ valid for RBS- and positron data

    ā€¢ only exception: Si self-implantation

    ā€¢ can be explained: extra Si atoms are interstitials and kill vacancies that are seen by positrons but not by RBS

    RBS results

    positron results

    S. Eichler, PhD Thesis, 1997

  • V. Bondarenko, Martin-Luther-University, Halle, Germany

    Annealing behavior of defectsAnnealing behavior of defectsAnnealing behavior of defects

    ā€¢ Annealing of defects in boron-implanted FZ-Si

    ā€¢ Main annealing stage at 730K

    ā€¢ but divacancies anneal at 550K

    ā€¢ larger clusters are the dominating defects

    S. Eichler, PhD Thesis, 1997

  • V. Bondarenko, Martin-Luther-University, Halle, Germany

    Positron lifetime beamPositron lifetime beamPositron lifetime beam

    lifetime measurements are more difficult

    a system of chopper and bunchers: short

    pulses of monoenergetic positrons

    two systems are available till now: ā€¢ Munich (Germany)ā€¢ Tsukuba (Japan)

    Munich system

    n-type Si

    Kƶgel et al., Mat. Sci. Forum 175 (1995) 107

  • V. Bondarenko, Martin-Luther-University, Halle, Germany

    Lifetime measurements in SiC layerLifetime measurements in Lifetime measurements in SiCSiC layerlayer

    Si and B coimplantaioninto SiC layers on Si

    Average positron lifetime behaves similar to S-para-meter

    Ļ„2 = 300Ā±6 ps ā†’ small vacancy cluster defects

    F. Redmann, PhD Thesis, 2003

  • V. Bondarenko, Martin-Luther-University, Halle, Germany

    Scanning positron microscopeScanning positron microscopeScanning positron microscope

    Variable energy micro-beam of monoenergetic positronsLateral resolution of 2 Āµm is achievedLifetime measurements at different beam energies are possible

    Principle disadvantage: broad positron implantation profile at high energies

    Electron and positron beam image of the surface of a test chip. Light area is SiO2, dark area is platinum

  • V. Bondarenko, Martin-Luther-University, Halle, Germany

    Depth defect profiling with positron microbeamDepth defect profiling with positron Depth defect profiling with positron microbeammicrobeam

    scan direction

    positronmicrobeamE = 8 keV

    lateral resolution1 ... 2 mĀµ

    Ī± = 0.6Ā°

    posi

    tron

    lifet

    ime

    (ps)

    scan width0 1 mm

    defect depth10 mĀµ

    Ļ„bulk

    Ļ„defect

    Energy is constant at 8 keV

    Sample is wedged at 0.6Ā°

    Defect profile of 10 Āµm is ā€œstretchedā€ to 1 mm

    Depth resolution can be optimized

    First time used to study Rp/2 effect in Si after self-implantationR. Krause-Rehberg et al., Appl. Phys. Lett. 77 (2000) 3932

  • V. Bondarenko, Martin-Luther-University, Halle, Germany

    Defects in high-energy self-implanted Si ā€“ The Rp/2 effectDefects in highDefects in high--energy selfenergy self--implanted implanted SiSi ā€“ā€“ The RThe Rpp/2 effect/2 effect

    after high-energy (3.5 MeV) self-implantation of Si (5 Ɨ 1015 cm-2) and RTA annealing (900Ā°C, 30s): two new gettering zones appear at Rp an Rp/2 (Rp ā€“ projected range of Si+)visible by SIMS profiling after intentional Cu contamination

    0 1 2 3 41015

    1016

    1017

    Cu

    conc

    entra

    tion

    (cm

    -3)

    Depth (Āµm)

    RpRp/2

    SIMS

    TEM image by P. Werner, MPI Halle

    ā€¢ at Rp: gettering by interstitial-type dislocation loops (formed by excess interstitials during RTA)

    ā€¢ no defects visible by TEM at Rp/2ā€¢ What type are these defects?

    Interstitial type [3,4]

    Vacancy type [1,2]

    [1] R. A. Brown, et al., J. Appl. Phys. 84 (1998) 2459[2] J. Xu, et al., Appl. Phys. Lett. 74 (1999) 997[3] R. Kƶgler, et al., Appl. Phys. Lett. 75 (1999) 1279[4] A. Peeva, et al., NIM B 161 (2000) 1090

  • Rp/2 effect investigation RRpp/2 effect investigation /2 effect investigation

    0 1 2 3 4 5 6260

    280

    300

    320

    340

    360

    380

    0,4

    0,6

    0,80 1 2 3 4 5 6

    divacancy-typedefect

    microvoids

    defect-relatedlifetime

    fraction of trapped positrons

    Rp/2

    Rp

    Silicon self-implantation - 3.5 MeV, 5Ɨ1015 cm-2

    - annealed 30s 900Ā°C- Cu contaminated

    surfacebulk silicon

    aver

    age

    lifet

    ime

    (ps)

    depth (Āµm)

    350

    400

    450

    Ļ„ 2 (p

    s)

    Ī·

    Cu SIMS-Profil

    Both defect regions are gut visible

    ā€¢ vacancy clusters with increasing concentration up to 2 Āµm (Rp/2)

    ā€¢ in Rp region: lifetime Ļ„2=320 ps; open volume corresponds to di-vacancy; defects are stabilized by dislocation loops

    very good agreement with the SIMS profile of in-diffused Cu

    R. Krause-Rehberg et al., Appl. Phys. Lett. 77 (2000) 3932

  • V. Bondarenko, Martin-Luther-University, Halle, Germany

    Positron lifetime image of fatigue crack with SPMPositron lifetime image of fatigue crack with SPMPositron lifetime image of fatigue crack with SPM

    Lifetime measurements around a fatigue crack created in technical copper was measured

    e+ Energy = 16 keV

    spatial resolution about 5 Āµm

    two lifetimes were observed:ā€¢ 190 ps ā€“ dislocationsā€¢ 360-420 ps ā€“ within 40 Āµm from the crack ā€“ vacancy clusters

    have been for the first time microscopically observed

    W. Egger et al., Applied Surface Sci. 194 (2002)

  • V. Bondarenko, Martin-Luther-University, Halle, Germany

    ConclusionConclusionConclusion

    positron annihilation is a sensitive tool for investigation of vacancy-like defects in solidsinformation on type and concentration of vacancies is receivedthin layers can be studied by mono-energetic positron beamimproved defect depth profiling is possible by using positron microbeamsmicroscopic observation of defects with scanning positron microscope is nowadays possible

    This presentation can be found as a This presentation can be found as a pdfpdf--file on our Websitesfile on our Websites:

    http://positron.physik.uni-halle.dehttp://PositronAnnihilation.net