UWWTD SIIF 2 nd Workshop 24 October 2013 Structured
Implementation and Information Frameworks Thematic aspects Proposal
European Commission Directorate General for the Environment unit
C.2 - Marine Environment & Water Industry Updating frequency
and implementation calendar Proposal of changes in parameters
Report - Contact Receiving areas Agglomerations UWWTP-Agglo UWWTPs
Discharges points Compliance Forward looking aspects Agglomerations
Forward looking aspects UWWTPs Forward looking aspects UWWTP-Agglo
Forward looking aspects template Conclusion Updating Frequency and
implementation calendar Updating Frequency Current situation All
mandatory parameters each two years for all agglomerations, Choice
between two reference years, Updating Frequency Proposal Decrease
the frequency of updating for compliant situation Increase the
frequency of updating for not compliant situation (at least each
year for none SIIF country at least every six months for SIIF and
PIA countries ?) Proposal a clear agenda of what to do and when
Proposal updating Frequency (first five years) Reference Date End
2014 (for ALL MS) Deadline 31 December 2015 End 2015 (for MS with
not compliant situations) Deadline 31 December 2016 End 2016 (for
ALL MS) Deadline 31 December 2017 End 2017 (for MS with not
compliant situations) Deadline 31 December 2018 End 2018 (for ALL
MS) Deadline 31 December 2019 Reporter, report period, contact
Article 15(4) All information to be collected. Agglomerations, TPs,
Discharges points Article 15(4) Information regarding all
agglomerations and or treatment plants, discharges points to be
updated. For some proposed new (or newly compulsory) parameters,
e.g. incoming load BOD, only info for agglomerations larger than
p.e. is due. Information regarding NC or PIA dependent situations
to be updated. Information regarding NC or PIA dependent situations
to be updated. Information regarding all agglomerations larger than
p.e and or treatment plants, discharges points to be updated. For
some proposed new (or newly compulsory) parameters, e.g. incoming
load BOD, only info for agglomerations larger than p.e. is due.
Information regarding NC or PIA dependent situations to be updated.
Information regarding all agglomerations and or treatment plants,
discharges points to be updated. For some proposed new (or newly
compulsory) parameters, e.g. incoming load BOD, only info for
agglomerations larger than p.e. is due. Receiving areas Article
5.8, 5.4 and 6 Article 15(4) All information to be collected.
Information regarding NC or PIA dependent situations to be updated.
Information regarding new sensitive areas Information regarding NC
or PIA dependent situations to be updated. Information regarding
new sensitive areas Information regarding NC or PIA dependent
situations to be updated. Information regarding new sensitive areas
All information to be collected. MS level Article 15(4) All
information to be collected. UWWTD compliance information Article
15(4) Resulting from collected and assessed information.
Information regarding NC or PIA dependent situations to be updated.
Information regarding NC or PIA dependent situations to be updated
Resulting from collected and assessed information Information
regarding NC or PIA dependent situations to be updated. Resulting
from collected and assessed information. UWWTD forward looking
aspects Article 15(4)* All information to be collected for
countries adhering to the SIIF concept. National report Article 16
All information to be collected. Online reports allowed for
countries using a decentralized approach. All information to be
collected. Online reports allowed for countries using a
decentralized approach. All information to be collected. Online
reports allowed for countries using a decentralized approach.
Implementation plans Art. 17 Updated if necessary Other PRODUCTS EC
written REPORT EC SIIF Viewer National SIIF Viewer EC SIIF Viewer
National SIIF Viewer EC written REPORT EC SIIF Viewer National SIIF
Viewer EC SIIF Viewer National SIIF Viewer EC written REPORT EC
SIIF Viewer National SIIF Viewer Reference Date End 2019 (for MS
with not compliant situations) Deadline 31 December 2020 End 2020
(for ALL MS) Deadline 31 December 2021 End 2021 (for MS with not
compliant situations) Deadline 31 December 2022 End 2022 (for ALL
MS) Deadline 31 December 2023 Reporter, report period, contact
Article 15(4) All information to be collected. Agglomeration s,
TPs, Discharges points Article 15(4) Information regarding NC or
PIA dependent situations to be updated. Information regarding all
agglomerations larger than p.e and or treatment plants, discharges
points to be updated. Information regarding NC or PIA dependent
situations to be updated. Information regarding all agglomerations
and or treatment plants, discharges points to be updated. Receiving
areas Article 5.8, 5.4 and 6 Article 15(4) Information regarding NC
or PIA dependent situations to be updated. Information regarding
new sensitive areas Information regarding NC or PIA dependent
situations to be updated. Information regarding new sensitive areas
Information regarding NC or PIA dependent situations to be updated.
Information regarding new sensitive areas All information to be
collected. MS level Article 15(4) All information to be collected.
UWWTD compliance information Article 15(4) Information regarding NC
or PIA dependent situations to be updated. Information regarding NC
or PIA dependent situations to be updated Resulting from collected
and assessed information Information regarding NC or PIA dependent
situations to be updated. Resulting from collected and assessed
information. UWWTD forward looking aspects Article 15(4)* All
information to be collected for countries adhering to the SIIF
concept. National report Article 16 All information to be
collected. Online reports allowed for countries using a
decentralized approach. All information to be collected. Online
reports allowed for countries using a decentralized approach.
Implementatio n plans Article 17 Updated if necessary Other
PRODUCTS EC SIIF Viewer National SIIF Viewer EC written REPORT EC
SIIF Viewer National SIIF Viewer EC SIIF Viewer National SIIF
Viewer EC written REPORT EC SIIF Viewer National SIIF Viewer
Proposal updating Frequency (routine situation) Proposal of changes
in parameters Proposal change in parameters report reportperiode
contact Deletion of five parameters
FieldnameLabel/ExplanationExplanation rptMStateValueMember State
Parameter can be automatically filled by rptMStateKey
rptCultureCulture code Only relevant for import/ export
functionality rptFormRAIndication of type of receiving area Only
relevant for import/ export functionality Parameter
(Fieldname)Explanation Fax (conFax)The Fax-number is seldom used
Parameter (Fieldname)Explanation Reported Year (repReportedPeriod)
Parameter can be automatically filled by repSituationAt Proposal
change in parameters Receiving areas Reorganisation of the block on
account of shortcomings with the relevant dates and parameters
Deletion of three parameters Parameter (Fieldname)Explanation
Indication of application of Art. 5(4) (rcaArt54Applied) In case a
MS applies Art. 5(4), the starting date of application of Art. 5(4)
(rcaDateArt54) has to be provided. The indication of this parameter
makes the mere indication of application of Art. 5(4) redundant
Root of corresponding GIS- data file Not relevant as the link
between receiving areas reported via tabular data and GIS-files on
sensitive areas can be established via the ID of the area (no need
for the root of corresponding GIS- data file) Last date of
designation or revision/ in case Art. 5(8) and 5(2-3) is applied:
Starting date of application of Art. 5(2-3) (rcaDateDesignation)
This parameter will be replaced by other parameters (see proposal
for new parameters) Proposal change in parameters Receiving areas
Addition of nine mandatory parameters Parameter (Fieldname) ID of
the successor (historical data management) Date of designation:
Art. 5(2,3) criterion a (N) Date of designation: Art. 5(2,3)
criterion a (P) Date of designation: Art. 5(2,3) criterion b Date
of designation: Art. 5(2,3) criterion c Starting date of
application of Art. 5(2,3) criterion a (N) Starting date of
application of Art. 5(2,3) - criterion a (P) Starting date of
application of Art. 5(2,3) - criterion b Starting date of
application of Art. 5(2,3) - criterion c Proposal change in
parameters Receiving areas The situation will be clearer for
everybody and do not need lots of work. There will be a very low
update of this information only when new sensitive areas are
designated or when there is a merge of several sensitive areas.
When using article 5.4, the load has to be updated every 4 years
when the situation is compliant and every 2 years in not compliant
situations. It will be possible for a MS to give this information
every year if there is a new compliant situation. Proposal change
in parameters Agglomerations Deletion of two parameters Parameter
(Fieldname)Explanation Date of the relevant deadline of UWWTD or
Transitional Period (aggPeriodOver) Parameter will be replaced by
other parameters (see proposal for new mandatory parameters) When
will the total generated load of the agglomeration be collected
through collecting systems or addressed through IAS? (aggForecast)
Parameter will be replaced by other parameters (see proposal for
forward looking aspects) Proposal change in parameters
Agglomerations Shift of three parameters to the MS level This is
measures which have to be taken at national level, or at least at
regional level for some MS ? It has to do with the implementation
plan. Parameter (Fieldname)Proposed future assessment What are the
measures based on: Dilution rates (aggDilutionRates) What are the
measures based on: Dilution rates, capacity in relation to dry
weather flow, acceptable number of overflows per year What are the
measures based on: Capacity in relation to dry weather flow
(aggCapacity) What are the measures based on: Acceptable number of
overflows per year (aggAccOverflows) Proposal change in parameters
Agglomerations Add nine new mandatory parameters There are no
difficulties to fulfill the dates of relevant deadlines which are
well known for each country. To add dates of compliance for each
agglomeration needs more effort but when it is done it will change
every years. The date can be the deadline if there is no other
information. This information is useful to calculate automatically
the compliance Parameter ID of the successor (historic data
management) Date of the relevant deadline of UWWTD or Transitional
Period Art. 3/ Art. 4/ Art. 5/ Art. 6 Date of compliance for Art.
3/ Art. 4/ Art. 5/ Art. 6 Proposal change in parameters
Agglomerations Proposal to add two voluntary parameters These
parameters are useful for a general approach to know the sanitation
situation of a territory and for local approaches when you have to
build a new treatment plant and collecting system or if you want to
know if your sanitation system is in link with the population. This
is a voluntary proposal for compliant situation because it is not
easy for MS which calculate the load of the agglomeration with the
entering load of a treatment plant to have this information. It
could be mandatory for not compliant situations. The names of the
municipalies and communes of the agglomeration are stable
informations. The frequency of updating population inhabitants in a
compliant country is very low. The definition of what is the
population has to be precised. Parameter Name of the
municipalities/ communes of this agglomeration Population
(inhabitants) of an agglomeration Proposal change in parameters
Agglomerations Proposal to change the assessment of six parameters
Proposal : the comments on significant changes could be mandatory
when there is : an increase of more than 20% and more than the size
of the TP, a change of threshold and treatment objectives a
difference of more than 30%. Proposal : if the rate of the load
adressed through IAS is more than 10% of the load of the
agglomeration then it could be mandatory to fill the last three
parameters for all agglomerations Proposal : if the generated load
of agglomeration not collected through collecting systems and not
addressed through IAS is more than 2%, the agglomeration could be
not compliant article 3. (no more treshold of p.e ?) Parameter
(Fieldname) Comments on significant changes of the generated load
compared to the previous reported load (aggChangesComment) Rate of
generated load of agglomeration addressed through IAS (% of p.e.)
(aggC2) Rate of generated load of agglomeration not collected
through collecting systems and not addressed through IAS (% of
p.e.) (aggPercWithoutTreatment) IAS - in situ and/ or transported
to UWWTPs by trucks: How much in % of generated load of
agglomeration with primary/ secondary/ more stringent treatment
(aggPercPrim/Sec/StringentTreatment) Proposal change in parameters
Agglomerations Change the statut of four parameters (voluntary to
mandatory) Proposal : Mandatory for agglomerations with a
progressive implementation (each two years) depending from the size
of the agglomeration. The information could be the result of an
average year (e.g. measured or estimated over four-five years)
Important parameter to be able to quantify the untreated UWW
discharges. Implementation of WFD, MSFD, BWD, protection of
shellfish and water activities e.g. With this information it could
be possible to quantify the reduction of litter discharged through
the combined sewer overflows. Parameter (Fieldname) Type of
collecting system: combined, separated or both? (aggSewageNetwork)
Is best technical knowledge to limit pollution applied?
(aggBestTechnicalKnowledge) How much raw sewage has been discharged
through combined sewer overflows (CSOs) in the year reported: m3/y
(aggSewerOverflows_m 3 ) How much raw sewage has been discharged
through combined sewer overflows (CSOs) in the year reported: p.e.
(aggSewerOverflows_pe) Proposal change in parameters UWWTAgglos
Deletion of one parameter It could be more useful to have
information about the rate of the entering load of the treatment
plan, which can disturb the operating, in the UWWTD block.
Parameter (Fieldname) Rate of generated load of agglomeration
transported to this UWWTP by trucks (%) (aucPercC2T ) Proposal
change in parameters UWWT Deletion of 22 parameters Parameter
(Fieldname)Explanation In cause of failure: Major accidents
(uwwAccidents)Major accidents are not relevant for non-compliance
In cause of failure: Further information on cause of failure
(uwwInformation) Main reasons for non compliance are bad design or
bad management, therefore, this parameter is considered as not
relevant More stringent treatment (uwwOtherTreatment)Redundant
parameter Explanation for closing of the UWWTP/What happened with
the wastewater since last reporting exercise (uwwHistorie) Will be
covered in the section Forward looking aspects, and there is the
parameter ID of successor Other type of more stringent
(uwwOther)Redundant parameter Incoming loads BOD-tot Calculated
(uwwBODIncomingCalculated) Will be replaced by only one parameter
for incoming and discharged load of BOD, COD, Ntot and Ptot, each
and one parameter, indicating the method used to determine the load
(measured, calculated, estimated) Incoming loads BOD-tot Estimated
(uwwBODIncomingEstimated) Incoming loads COD-tot Calculated
(uwwCODIncomingCalculated) Incoming loads COD-tot Estimated
(uwwCODIncomingEstimated) Incoming loads N-tot Calculated
(uwwNIncomingCalculated) Incoming loads N-tot Estimated
(uwwNIncomingEstimated) Incoming loads P-tot Calculated
(uwwPIncomingCalculated) Incoming loads P-tot Estimated
(uwwPIncomingEstimated) Discharged loads BOD-tot Calculated
(uwwBODDischargedCalculated) Discharged loads BOD-tot Estimated
(uwwBODDischargedEstimated) Discharged loads COD-tot Calculated
(uwwCODDischargedCalculated) Discharged loads COD-tot Estimated
(uwwCODDischargedEstimated) Discharged loads N-tot Calculated
(uwwNDischargedCalculated) Discharged loads N-tot Estimated
(uwwNDischargedEstimated) Discharged loads P-tot Calculated
(uwwPDischargedCalculated) Discharged loads P-tot Estimated
(uwwPDischargedEstimated) Proposal change in parameters UWWTP
Addition of one new master data, two new voluntary parameters and
one mandatory parameter Parameter (Fieldname)Explanation ID of the
successor (historic data management) Explanation: see table
Agglomerations Proposal: Master data Sewage treatment technology
This information is relevant for the water experts to know which
technology is in place in each country. Crossing this information
with other data of the database will help to lead sanitation policy
in Europe and each country. On the long-term a pre-defined list
could be provided to the MS (e.g. MBR, SBR, biological filter,
extended aeration activated sludge, other activated sludge, lagoon,
aerated lagoon, rotated biological contactor, reed bed filter,
trickling filter, physico-chemical clarification, decantation,)
Proposal: voluntary data Sludge treatment technology This
information is relevant for the water experts to know which
technology is in place in each country. Crossing this information
with other data of the database will help to lead sanitation policy
in Europe and each country. On the long-term a pre-defined list
could be provided to the MS (e.g. dewatering, aerobic
stabilization,) with a progressive implementation (each two years)
depending from the size of the agglomeration (see table in chapter
3) Proposal: voluntary parameter Rate of entering load transported
to this UWWTP by trucks (%) Mandatory parameter for agglomerations,
where the fraction of total generated load transported to this
UWWTP by truck is >20%with a progressive implementation (each
two years) depending from the size of the agglomeration (see table
in annex 1) Proposal change in parameters UWWTP change of status/
assessment for thirteen parameters Proposal : Proposal to
denominate these parameters to Incoming load BOD-tot, Incoming load
COD-tot, etc. and to include one general parameter, which gives the
method to determine the load Method used to determine the incoming
and discharged loads. Mandatory for agglomerations with a
progressive implementation (each two years) depending from the size
of the agglomeration. Important parameters to be able to quantify
the actual performances of the TPs and the discharges. Directly in
link with the implementation of WFD, MSFD, BWD, international
Conventions and Commissions, protection of shellfish and water
activities Parameter (Fieldname)Current status/ assessment Incoming
load BOD-tot measured (uwwBODIncomingMeasured ) Voluntary
parameters Incoming load COD-tot measured (uwwCODIncomingMeasured )
Incoming load N-tot measured (uwwNIncomingMeasured ) Incoming load
P-tot measured (uwwPIncomingMeasured ) Discharged load BOD-tot
measured (uwwBODDischargedMeasured ) Discharged load COD-tot
measured (uwwCODDischargedMeasured ) Discharged load N-tot measured
(uwwNDischargedMeasured ) Discharged load P-tot measured
(uwwPDischargedMeasured ) Method used to determine the incoming and
discharged loads Proposal change in parameters UWWTP Change of
denomination and status/ assessment for thirteen parameters
Proposal : denominate the first and second parameter to Volume of
waste water treated and partially treated in the WWTP (m/y) and
Methode used to determine the volume of waste water treated and
partially treated in the WWTP (m3/y) Mandatory for agglomerations
with a progressive implementation (each two years) depending from
the size of the agglomeration. Important parameter in term of
pressure and directly in link with the parameters from the previous
slide. Proposal to combine the two last parameters into the
following mandatory parameter In cause of failure: Bad performance/
bad design or dimensioning Parameter (Fieldname)Current status/
assessment Volume of waste water treated (m/y)
(uwwWasteWaterTreated)Voluntary parameter Method used to determine
the volume of waste water treated (uwwMethodWasteWaterTreated)
Voluntary parameter In cause of failure: Bad design or dimensioning
(uwwBadDesign) Mandatory parameter In cause of failure: Bad
performance (uwwBadPerformance) Proposal change in parameters UWWTP
Change the statut of one parameter (voluntary to mandatory)
Parameter (Fieldname) Current status/ assessment Proposed future
status/ assessment Identification whether it is the existing UWWTP
(in operation) or a collecting system without UWWTPs
(uwwCollectingSystem) Voluntary parameter Mandatory parameter. This
information is important when there is a direct discharge without
any treatment Proposal change in parameters Discharges Points
Through this block, It could be possible for MS to add information
on discharges points of untreated urban waste water of the
collecting systems and not only of the UWWTPs. It is also possible
to add information on several Discharges points of the UWWTPs
especially of discharged points of untreated urban waste water.
This information has to do with the good implementation of the
directive during dry and wet weather. This information is also
relevant because this discharges may be responsable of the
pollution of the receiving water (e.g bad ecological status,
microbiological pollution of bathing and shellfish areas, marine
litter). The proposal is to have a progressive implementation
depending from the size of the agglomeration but with a threshold
of p.e to identify the main pressure. Proposal change in parameters
Discharges Points Deletion of seven parameters Proposal : The only
links useful are receiving areas, WFD waterbodies and districts.
With this information it will be possible to make links with the
WFD database. Parameter (Fieldname) Select degree of sensitivity of
receiving area (dcpTypeOfReceivingArea) Are there surface waters
available? (dcpSurfaceWaters) ID of WFD groundwater body
(dcpGroundWater) ID of WFD sub-unit (dcpWFDSubUnit) Reference date
of WFD groundwater body (dcpGroundWaterReferenceDate) Reference
date of receiving water (dcpReceivingWaterReferenceDate) Reference
date of WFD sub-unit (dcpWFDSubUnitReferenceDate) Proposal change
in parameters Discharges Points Addition of six new mandatory
parameters Parameter (Fieldname)Explanation ID of the successor
(historic data management) Explanation: see table Agglomerations
Proposal: Master data EffluentFlowType This parameter shall
describe the type of effluent from the discharge point and make
clear, how wet weather is considered. It is proposed to fill this
parameter with one of the pre- defined values (List of values -
LOV): Treated effluent dry and wet weather, partially treated storm
water Treated effluent dry and wet weather Treated effluent dry
weather Treated effluent dry and partially treated wet weather
Partially treated effluent dry and wet weather Untreated effluent
dry and wet weather in the UWWTP Untreated effluent dry and wet
weather in the collecting system Partially treated effluent - dry
and wet weather in the collecting system Proposal: Progressively
master data (to be discussed with the MS, whether information is
available). Name of the WFD waterbody Names of WFD waterbodies and
WFD river basin districts will be more familiar to the users of the
UWWTD SIIF, than IDs. Proposal: Master data Name of the WFD river
basin district Proposal change in parameters Discharges Points
Addition of six new mandatory parameters Proposal : The first
parameter could be compulsory only for agglomeration of more than
p.e or for discharges in collecting systems and for treatment plans
with a load entering of more than p.e.. MS could provide either the
value of the reference date either an average value of the last
five years The discharges of the agglomeration have to be compliant
with the objectives of the other relevant directives. It is
important to know if the infrastructure of the agglomeration is
sufficient or not regarding this different aims (e.g. BWD, WFD,
MSFD, shellfish, Natura 2000,). A progressive implementation of the
last parameter is a way to identify in the WFD program of measures
what is relevant or not. Parameter (Fieldname) Volume of untreated
waste water (m/y ) Does the discharge affect the objectives of
other relevant Directives (e.g. MSFD, WFD, BWD,)? (UWWTD Annex
I.B.4) Proposal change in parameters Discharges Points Change the
statut of one parameter (voluntary to mandatory) Proposal : It
could only be mandatory for agglomerations of more than p.e and
discharges in collecting systems which can discharge a load of more
than p.e. MS could provide either the value of the reference date
either an average value of the last five years Parameter
(Fieldname) Indicate the number of overflows each year in case the
parameter EffluentFlowType is filled with Untreated effluent dry
and wet weather in the UWWTP or Untreated effluent dry and wet
weather in the collecting system Proposal change in parameters
Discharges Points Change of the denomation of two parameters
Parameter (Fieldname)Explanation Reference date of the WFD
waterbody (dcpWaterBodyReferenceDate) Instead of reference date
these parameters should be renamed to Version of. Reference date of
the WFD river basin district (dcpWFDRBDReferenceDate) Proposal
change in parameters Industries (voluntary) Propose to add one new
compulsory parameter Parameter (Fieldname) ID of the successor
(historical data management) Proposal change in parameters MS level
Deletion of two voluntary parameters Proposal : the number of
inhabitants connected to treatment plants are replaces by three
parameters depending from the size Parameter (Fieldname) brief text
information on the fate of generated wastewater that does not
receive any treatment (aggInfoFateWithoutTreatment) Number of
inhabitants connected to treatment plants (mslInhabitantsUwwtp)
Proposal change in parameters MS level Addition of seven new
mandatory parameters Proposal : Only at national level, these
paremeters are useful at national level to conduct any national
policy and for forecasting aspects. The Number of inhabitants are
directly in links with the eurostat questionnary. To be reported
every two years or four years depending from the compliance.
Parameter (Fieldname) Km of combined sewer system Km of separeted
sewer system Investment costs in TPs and collecting systems
Operating costs in Tps and collecting systems (without depreciation
of the investments) Number of inhabitants connected to primary
treatment plants Number of inhabitants connected to secondary
treatment plants Number of inhabitants connected to more stringent
treatment plants Proposal change in parameters MS level Addition of
four new voluntary parameters Proposal : Only at national level,
these paremeters could be useful to have a more accurate view of
the investments and operating costs. Parameter (Fieldname)
Investment costs in TPs Investment costs in collecting systems
Operating costs in Tps Operating costs in collecting systems
Proposal change in parameters MS level Change the statut of seven
parameters (voluntary to mandatory) Proposal : to be reported every
two years or four years depending from the compliance Parameter
(Fieldname) Number of inhabitants connected to IAS
(mslInhabitantsIAS) Number of inhabitants not connected to
collecting system nor served by IAS
(mslInhabitantsWithoutTreatment) Number of inhabitants connected to
collecting systems (mslInhabitantsCollSyst) Number of inhabitants
connected to treatment plant serving agglomeration smaller than
2,000 p.e. (mslInhabitantsUwwtpAgglo2) Number of inhabitants
connected to collecting systems serving agglomeration smaller than
2,000 p.e. (mslInhabitantsCollSystAgglo2) Number of inhabitants
connected to collecting system or treatment plant serving
agglomeration smaller than 2,000 p.e. (mslInhabitantsIASAgglo2)
Number of inhabitants in agglomeration smaller than 2,000 p.e.
(mslInhabitantsWithoutTreatmentAgglo2) Proposal change in
parameters Compliance information Addition of eleven ten mandatory
parameters Proposal : These parameters will be automatically
calculated with the other parameters Parameter (Fieldname)
Parameters Compliance as regards waste water collection (Art. 3)/
waste water treatment (Art. 4)/ (Art. 5)/ (Art. 6) at reference
date Compliance as regards waste water treatment installation (Art.
4/ Art. 5/ Art. 6) at reference date Compliance as regards waste
water treatment performance (Art. 4/ Art. 5/ Art. 6) at reference
date Proposal change in parameters Forward looking aspects
agglomerations (for not compliant situations) Addition of sixteen
new mandatory parameters for agglomerations and collecting systems
Parameter (Fieldname) Measure and related costs: Does the measure/
related cost refer to: new construction/ rehabilitation/ up-grade
Name of the institution in charge of the UWW management Forecasted
number of inhabitants of the agglomeration Forecasted generated
load of the agglomeration Forecasted names of the
municipalities/communes of the agglomeration Forecasted rate of
gen. load of agglomeration collected through collecting system (%
of p.e.) Forecasted rate of gen. load of agglomeration addressed
through IAS (% of p.e.) Forecasted rate of gen. load of
agglomeration not collected through collecting systems and not
addressed through IAS (% of p.e.) Parameter Start of planning
(mm/yy) or Estimated year of start of planning (yyyy) Parameter
Start of work (mm/yy) or Estimated year of start of work (yyyy)
Parameter Date of completion of work (mm/yy) or Estimated year of
completion of work (yyyy) Parameter Date of compliance of
collecting system (mm/yy) or Estimated date of compliance
collecting system(yyyy) to be discussed with the MS Capital
investment planned () for collecting system: It might be good to
provide MS some basic drop-down menu specifications of what costs
entail (construction only; incl. capitalised operation, VAT, etc)
to make the costs comparable. Name of EU fund planned to be used:
collecting system (if any) (planned) EU-funding: collecting system
() Comments Proposal change in parameters Forward looking aspects
UWWTPs (for not compliant situations) Addition of fifhteen new
mandatory parameters for UWWTPs Parameter (Fieldname) Measure and
related costs: Does the measure/ related cost refer to: new
construction/ rehabilitation/ up-grade Name of the institution in
charge of the UWWTP Forecasted entering load of the UWWTP (p.e.)
Forecasted rate of entering load transported to this UWWTP by truck
(%) Forecasted organic design capacity (p.e.) Forecasted treatment
type: 1, 2, 3N, 3P, 3NP, 3other (please specify in the parameter
comments) Parameter Start of planning of UWWTP (mm/yy) or Estimated
year of start of planning of UWWTP (yyyy) Parameter Start of work
of UWWTP (mm/yy) or Estimated year of start of work of UWWTP(yyyy)
Parameter Date of completion of work of UWWTP (mm/yy) or Estimated
year of completion of work of UWWTP (yyyy) Parameter Date of
compliance UWWTP (mm/yy) or Estimated date of compliance UWWTP)
Capital investment planned () for UWWTP : It might be good to
provide MS some basic drop-down menu specifications of what costs
entail (construction only; incl. capitalised operation, VAT, etc)
to make the costs comparable. Name of EU fund planned to be used:
UWWTP (if any) (planned) EU-funding: UWWTP () Comments Proposal
change in parameters Forward looking aspects UWWTP-Agglo (for not
compliant situations) Addition of one new mandatory parameters for
TPs Parameter (Fieldname) Forecasted rate of load of agglomeration
collected in collecting system and entering that treatment plant
Forward looking aspects and compliance template A way to
disseminate and use the information at national and EU level Could
be a spreadsheet with several sheets (compliance, current situation
and forward lookin aspects of the collecting systems, UWWTPS and
receiving areas) Has to be in link with the templates of article 17
and in case of infringement procedures to facilitate the exchange
of information and the collection of data and to avoid several
different formats Conclusion of the 24th October proposal
Conclusion of the 24th October proposal Change of frequency
depending from the size and the compliance, Deletion of 58
parameters (30 mandatory and 18 voluntary), Addition of 39
parameters (32 mandatory, 7 voluntary) without forward looking
aspects and compliance check, Change from voluntary to compulsory
of 27 parameters with a progressive implementation depending from
the size, Addition of 9 parameters with the compliance block
(automaticaly calculated), Addition of 32 parameters with the
forward looking aspects block The proposal template to disseminate
the information at EU and national level will depend from the
choice of parameters Conclusion of the 24th October proposal First
estimation of the decrease of data collection for UWWTD reporting
exercise For a 100% compliant country decrease of the work between
30% (first five years) and 45% (routine situation) For a 95%
compliant country without SIIF decrease of the work between 25%
(first five years) and 40% (routine situation) For a 80% compliant
SIIF country decrease of the work between 5% (first five years) and
20% (routine situation) For a 60 % compliant SIIF country increase
of the work between 0% (first five years) and 15% (routine
situation) Thank you for your attention.
