UvA-DARE is a service provided by the library of the University of Amsterdam (https://dare.uva.nl)

UvA-DARE (Digital Academic Repository)

The place where streams seek ground. Towards a new territorialgovernmentality: the meaning and usage of the concept of territorial cohesion inthe European Union

Hissink Muller, B.M.

Publication date2013

Link to publication

Citation for published version (APA):Hissink Muller, B. M. (2013). The place where streams seek ground. Towards a new territorialgovernmentality: the meaning and usage of the concept of territorial cohesion in the EuropeanUnion.

General rightsIt is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s)and/or copyright holder(s), other than for strictly personal, individual use, unless the work is under an opencontent license (like Creative Commons).

Disclaimer/Complaints regulationsIf you believe that digital publication of certain material infringes any of your rights or (privacy) interests, pleaselet the Library know, stating your reasons. In case of a legitimate complaint, the Library will make the materialinaccessible and/or remove it from the website. Please Ask the Library: https://uba.uva.nl/en/contact, or a letterto: Library of the University of Amsterdam, Secretariat, Singel 425, 1012 WP Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Youwill be contacted as soon as possible.

Download date:02 Sep 2021

247

References

References

Aaker, D.A. and Day, G.S. (1990) Marketing Research, Fourth Edition, Wiley: New York, New York.Ackoff, R. L. (1989) ‘From data to wisdom’, Journal of Applied Systems Analysis, 16, 3-9.Adams, J., Clemens, E.S., and Shola Orloff, A. (eds.) (2005) Remaking Modernity, Politics, History, and Sociology, Durnham and

London: Duke Unversity Press. – Biernacki, R.: ‘The Action Turn? Comparative-Historical Inquiry beyond the Classical Modals of Conduct’.

Adams, N. and Harris, N. (2005) GRIDS – Best practice guidelines for regional development strategies, working draft of 25 March 2005, Cardiff University.

AEM, CPMR Islands Commission, EUROMONTANA (undated) Call for the inclusion of a territorial cohesion objective in the constitutional treaty (europa.eu.int/futurum/forum_convention/ documents/contrib/pol/0380_c_en.pdf, visited 13-10-2003)

AER – Assembly of European Regions (1995) Resolution of the Assembly of the European Regions of the recognition of the concept of territorial cohesion, Sweden.

AER – Assembly of European Regions (2000) Winter 2000/2001editorial, ‘What architecture for tomorrow’s Europe, The Regions of Europe prepare’, online: http://www.aer.eu/publications/aer-on-line.html, visited 1-10-2010.

AER – Assembly of European Regions (undated) Amendment proposal of the draft provisions relating to economic and social cohesion and transeuropean networks (www.are-regions-europe.org/PDF/CA_Main_Texts/Positions%20Convention/ Cohesion/GB-AER-Amendments-Cohesion.pdf, visited 15-11-2003)

Agence Europe (2005) Le PE demande une desserte équilibrée et le renforcement avec les régions ultrapériphériques de l’UE, Document No. AEFR000020051001e1a10000m, Strasbourg, 30-9-2005, Brussels.

Albrechts, L., Healey, P., Kunzmann, K. (2003) ‘Strategic Spatial Planning and Regional Governance in Europe’, Journal of the American Planning Association, Vol. 69, No. 2, pp. 243-265.

Allen, D. (2000) ‘Cohesion and the structural funds: transfers and trade-offs’, in H. Wallace and W. Wallace (eds) Policy-making in the European Union, Oxford University Press: 243-265

Allen, J., Massey, D. and Cochrane, A. (1998) Rethinking the Region. London: Routledge.Allison, G. (1971) Essence of Decision, Boston: Harper Collins.Allmendinger, P. (2001) Planning in Postmodern Times, London and New York: Routledge.Allmendinger, P. (2002) ‘Towards a Post-Positivist Typology of Planning Theory’, in Planning Theory 1 (1): 77-99, SAGE Publications,

London.Allmendinger, P. and Tewdwr-Jones, M. (eds.) (2002) Planning Futures: New Directions for Planning Theory, London, Routledge.

– Flyvbjerg, B. and Richardson, T.: ‘Planning and Foucault, In Search of the Dark Side of Planning Theory’.Alvergne, C. & Musso, P.F. (2000) ‘Aménagement du territoire et prospective : Chroniques d’un devenir en construction’, Territoires

2020 : Revenue d’études et de prospective 1 ; 47-55Alvergne, C. & Musso, P. (eds) (2003) Les grands Texts de l’aménagement du territoire et de la décentralisation, La documentation

Française, Paris.Amin, A., Massey, D. and Thrift, N. (2003) Decentring the Nation: A Radical Approach to Regional Inequality, Catalyst Paper No. 8,

London, Catalyst.Amy, D.J. (1984) ‘Why Policy Analysis and Ethics Are Incompatible’, Journal of Policy Analysis and management’ Volume 3, No. 4, by

the Association for Public Policy Analysis and Management, pp. 573-591Andersen, S.S. and Burns, T. (1996) ‘The European Union and the erosion of parliamentary democracy: a study of post-parliamentary

governance’, in S.S. Andersen and K.A. Eliassen (Eds.), The European Union: How Democratic Is It?, London: Sage, pp. 227-251.Andersen, S.S. and Eliassen, K.A. (1993) Making Policy in Europe: The Europeification of national policy making, London: Sage.Anderson, B. (1991) Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism, London: Verso.Anderson, J.E. (2000) Public Policy Making, An Introduction, Fourth Edition, Texas A&M University, Houghton Mifflin Company,

Boston/New YorkAndersson, J. (1996) ‘The shifting stage of politics new medieval and postmodern territorialities?’, Environment and Planning D,

Society and Space 14(2): 133-153.André, I. and Moreira, F.J. (2002) ‘Searching new operative concepts to evaluate spatial and social Cohesion’, for the Fifth EES Biennal

Conference, Sevilla 2002 (www.europeanevaluation.org/general/Papers%20for%20the%20web/ a%20Theory%20%20T4/andremoreira.pdf, visited 5-10-2003)

Ansell, C.K. and Di Palma, G. (eds.) (2004) Restructuring Territoriality, Europe and the United States compared, Cambridge University Press, New York.

– Ansell, C.K.: ‘Restructuring Authority and Territoriality’. – Bartolini, S.: ‘Old and New Peripheries in the Processes of European Territorial Integration’

248

References

– Caporaso, J.A. and Jupille J.: ‘Sovereignty and Territory in the European Union, Transforming the UK Institutional Order’.

– Stone Sweet, A.: ‘Islands of Transnational Governance’. – Fabbrini, S.: ‘The European Union in American Perspective, The Transformation of Territorial Sovereignty in Europe

and the United States’. – Ansell, C.K.: ‘Territoriality, Authority, and Democracy’

Archer, M. (1995) Realist Social Theory: the Morphogenetic Approach, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.ARL – Akademie für Raumforschung und Landesplanung (2003) Spatial development policy in the European Constitutional Treaty,

Position Paper from the ARL, Hanover, Ernst-Hasso Ritter (Ed.), Hannover, Marz 2003 (Das Positionpaper wurde als Nr. 3 der ARL-Reihe “Studies in Spatial Development” In Deutsch, Englisch, Franzosisch verofftentlicht.)

ARL – Akademie für Raumforschung und Landesplanung (2004) Why the EU Needs a European Spatial Development Policy, position paper, Hannover.

Arrow, K.J. (1951) Social Choice and Individual Values, New York: Wiley.Atkinson, R. (2002) ‘The White Paper on European Governance: implications for urban policy’, European Planning Studies 10(6):

781-792.Atkinson, P and Coffey, A. (1997) ‘Analysing documentary realities’, in D. Silverman (ed.) Qualitative research: theory, method and

practice, London: Routledge.Atlantic Arc Cities (2000) Conference of Atlantic Arc Cities: Final Statement, 6/7 July 2000 (www.arcat.org/Ressources/Documents/

AG_2000_Dec_Fin_GB.pdf, visited 11-11-2003)Atlantic Arc Commission (2004) Declaration by the Atlantic Arc Commission on Cohesion Policy, Bilbao, 25 June 2004.Audet, M., Landry, M. and Déry, R. (1986) ‘Science et résolution de problème: Liens, difficultés et voies de dépassement dans le champ

des sciences de l’administration’, Philosophie des Sciences Sociales, 16, pp. 409-440.Bachtler, J. (2003a) ‘Politiques et strategies pour le développement régional: transformations du paradigme’, Territories 2020: Revue d’

etudes et de prospective, 8, pp. 81-87.Bachtler, J. (2003b) ‘The implementation of EU regional policy: experience from EU-15 Member States’ in V. Benč (ed.), Readiness of

the Candidate Countries for EU Regional Policy, Slovak Foreign Policy Association Conference Almanac, 3-5 November 2003, Bratislava, Slovak Foreign Policy Association.

Bachtler, J. Méndez, C., McMaster, I., and Wishlade, F. (2005) Programming with an Uncertain Future, Review of Programme Developments: Autumn 2004 – Spring 2005, IQ-Net Review Paper 16(1), European Policies Research Centres, Glasgow (May).

Bachtler, J. and Raines, P. (2002) ‘A new paradigm of regional policy? Reviewing recent trends in Europe’, (paper prepared for discussion at the Twenty-third Meeting of the Sponsors of the European Policies Research Centre, Ross Priory, 7-8 October).

Bachtler, J. and Taylor, S. (1999) Objective 2: Experiences, Lessons and Policy Implications, final report to DG Regional Policy, July, European Policies Research Centre, University of Strathclyde.

Bachtler, J. and Taylor, S. (2003) The Added Value of the Structural Funds: A Regional Perspective, IQ-Net Special Report, June, Glasgow, European Policies Research Centre, University of Strathclyde.

Bachtler, J., and Yuill, D. (2001) Policies and Strategies for Regional Development: A Shift in Paradigm?, Regional and Industrial Policy Research paper No. 46, Strathclyde, European Policies Research Centre.

Bachrach, P. and Baratz, M.S. (1970) Power and Poverty. Theory and Practice, New York: Oxford University Press.Bailly, A. and Fremont, A. (eds) (2001) Europe and its States: A Geography, Paris, La documentation Française.Ball, S. (1998) ‘Big policies/small world: an introduction to international perspectives in education Policy’, Comparative Education,

34, 2, 119-130.Balme, R., Jouve, B. (1996) ‘Building the regional state: Europe and territorial organization in France’, in: L. Hooghe (ed.) Cohesion

Policy and European Integration: Building Multi-Level Goverance, Oxford University Press, New York, 219-255.Banister, D., Capello, R. and Nijkamp, P. (1995) European Transport and Communications Networks: Policy evolution and change,

Chichester: John Wiley and Sons.Barker, P. (1998) Michael Foucault: An Introduction, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Barnier, M. (2002) ‘Postface’, in: Husson, C. (2002) L’Europe sans territoire: Essay sur le concept de cohésion territoriale, Paris, DATAR/

éditions de l’aube, 201-203.Barnier, M. (2004) Preface, in Innovative City and Business Regions (Structural Change in Europe 3), p. 1, Hagbarth Publications,

Bollschweil, Germany.Barry, F. and Begg, I. (2003), ‘EMU and cohesion: introduction’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 41, 621-643.Barry, A., Osborne, T. and Rose, N. (1996) Foucault and political reason: liberalism, neo-liberalism and rationalities of power, London,

UCL Press. – Burchell, G.: ‘Liberal governmentalities and technologies of the self ’ – Rose, N.: ‘Governing ‘advanced’ liberal democracies’

Bartlett, R. (1994) The Making of Europe, Conquest, Colonization, and Cultural Change, 950-1350, Penguin Books, London.

249

References

Barnett, C. (2001) ‘Culture, geography and the arts government’, Environment and Planning D: Scoiety and Space 19, pp. 7-24.Bastrup-Birk, H. & Doucet, P. (1997) ‘European spatial planning from the heart’, Build Environment 23 (4): 307-314.Bates, R.H., Greif, A., Levi, M., Rosenthal, J-L., and Weingast, B. (2000) ‘The Analytical narrative Project’, The Americn Political Science

Review, Vol.94, No.3, pp. 696-702.Bauby, P (2003) ‘Les cultures du service public en Europe, Par de-là les diversités’, Les frontiers du service public, Paris: La Documentation

française.Baudelle, G. and Peyrony, J. (2005) ‘Striving for Equity: Polycentric Development Policies in France’, Built Environment 31(20, p/

103-111.BBR – Bundesamt für Bauwesen und Raumordnung, (2001a) Study Programme on European Spatial Planning, Final Report. Bonn,

Selbstverlag des Bundeamtes für Bauwesen und Raumordnung BBR – Bundesamt für Bauwesen und Raumordnung, (2001b) Spatial Development and Spatial Planning in Germany, Bonn: BBR.BBR – Bundesamt für Bauwesen und Raumordnung (2002) 1st Interim Report ESPON project 3.1, Integrated tools for European

Spatial Development, 20 December 2002BBR – Bundesamt für Bauwesen und Raumordnung (2003a) 2nd Interim Report ESPON project 3.1, Integrated tools for European

Spatial Development, 29 April 2003BBR – Bundesamt für Bauwesen und Raumordnung (2003b) 3rd Interim Report ESPON project 3.1, Integrated tools for European

Spatial Development, 30 September 2003.BBR – Bundesamt für Bauwesen und Raumordnung (2005a) ESPON project 3.1 Integrated Tools for European Spatial Development,

Final Report Part A, Scientific and policy oriented conclusions of ESPON results until September 2004, July 2005.BBR – Bundesamt für Bauwesen und Raumordnung (2005b) ESPON project 3.1 Integrated Tools for European Spatial Development,

Final Report Part B, Synthetic summary of ESPON projects, July 2005.BBR – Bundesamt für Bauwesen und Raumordnung (2005c) ESPON project 3.1 New tools and instruments for European spatial

analysis, Final Report Part C, Integrated Tools for European Spatial Development, July 2005.BBR – Bundesamt für Bauwesen und Raumordnung (2005d) ESPON project 3.1: Integrated Tools for European Spatial Development,

Final Report Part C – Annex, New tools and instruments for European spatial analysis, Towards an ESPON Glossary, July 2005.Beauregard, R. A. (1995) If only the City could speak. The politics of re-presentation, in: H. Liggett and D. C. Perry (Eds) Spatial

Practices: Critical Explorations in Social/Spatial Theory, pp. 59–80. London: Sage.Begg, I., Berghman, J., Chassard, Y., Kosonen, P., Madsen, P.K., Matsaganis, M., Mayes, D., Muffels, R., Salais, R. and Tsakloglou, P.

(2001) Social Exclusion and Social Protection in the European Union: Policy Issues and Proposals for the Future Role of the EU, EXSPRO Policy Report. London: European Institute, South Bank University.

Behling, O. (1980) ‘The case for the natural science model for research in organizational behaviour and organization theory’, Academy of Management Review, 5, 483-490.

Belsey, C. (1980) Critical Practice, London: Methuen.Bengs, C. (2000) ‘From Conservation to Convelopment’, Built Environment 26(1), p. 13-20.Bengs, C. (2002) ‘Introduction’, in C. Bengs (ed.) Facing ESPON, Vol. 2002: 1, pp. 7-24, Stockholm: NordREGIO.Bengs, C. (2004) ‘Introduction to a discussion on the third cohesion report: policy-relevant research and research-relevant policy’,

European Journal of Spatial Development, available online only: http://www.nordregio.se/EJSD.Benz, A. (2000) ‘Two types of multi-level governance: intergovernmental relations in German and EU regional policy’, Regional and

Federal Studies, 10(3), pp. 115-131.Berezin, M. and Schain, M. (2004) Europe without Borders: Remapping Territory, Citizenship, and Identity in a Transnational Age, Johns

Hopkins University Press, Baltimore MD. – Berezin, M.: ‘Introduction: Territory, Emotion, and Identity, Spatial Recalibration in a New Europe’. – Axtmann, R.: ‘State Formation and Supranationalism in Europe, The Case of the Holy Roman Empire of the German

Nation’. – Díez-Medrano, J.: ‘Ways of Seeing European Integration, Germany, Great Britain, Spain’. – Calhoun, C.: ‘The Democratic Integration of Europe, Interests, Identity, and the Public Sphere’.

Berger, P.L. and Luckmann, T. (1966) The social construction of reality, New York: Anchor Books.Berger, P. and Luckmann, T. (1967) The social construction of reality, London: Doubleday.Biedenkopf, K., Geremek, B., and Michalski, K. (2004) The spiritual and cultural dimension of Europe: Concluding remarks (Reflection

Group initiated by the President of the European Commission., Vienna/Brussels: Institute for Human Sciences, http://europa.eu.int/comm/research/social-sciences/pdf/michalski_281004_final_report_en.pdf.

Biggs, M. (1999) ‘Putting the State on the Map: Cartography, Territory, and European State Formation’, Comparative Studies in Society and History, 41(2), pp. 374-405.

Blowers, A. (1980) The Limits of Power: The Politics of Local Planning Policy, Oxford: Pergamon.

250

References

BMBau – Bundesministerium für Bauwesen und Städtebau (1995) Grundlagen einer Europäischen Raumordnungspolitik – Principles for a European Spatial Development Policy – Principes pour une politique d’améngement du territoire européen, Selbstverlag der Bundesforschungsanstalt für Landeskunde und Raumordnung, Bauwesen und Städtebau.

BMVBW – Bundesministerium für Verkehr, Bau und Wohnungswesen (2005) Council of experts on European Spatial Development, Structure of Spatial Development within the Constitution of Europe – Expert Opinion, Final Report, Hunbolds-Universität and Nörr-Stiefenhofer-Lutz Lawyers, Berlin.

Böhme, K. (1998) ‘Northern impressions of the ESDP’, in C. Bengs and K. Böhme (eds.) The Progress of European Spatial Planning, pp. 77-86, Stockholm.

Böhme, K. (1999) ‘Interdependencies of spatial planning in and for Europe’, Bergen, Norway: XIII AESOP Congress, 7-11 July 1999.Böhme, K. (2002) Echoes of European Spatial Planning: Discursive Integration in Practice, Nordregio Report 2002, No. 8, Stockholm.Böhme, K., Richardson, T., Dabinett, G. and Jensen, O.B. (2004) ‘Values in a Vacuum? Towards an Integrated Multi-Level Analysis of

the Governance of European space’, European Planning Studies, Volume 12, No. 8, Carfax Publishing, pp. 1175-188.Boltanski, L. and Thévenot, L. (1991) De la justification, les economies de la grandeur, Paris: Gallimard.Booher, D.E. and Innes, J.E. (2002) ‘Network Power in Collaborative Planning’, Journal of Planning Education and Research, 21(3),

pp. 221-236.Bor, J. and van der Leeuw, K. (eds) (2003) 25 Eeuwen Oosterse Filosofie, 2e druk, Boom, AmsterdamBorneman, J. and Fowler, N. (1997) ‘Europeanization’, Annual Review of Anthropology, Vol. 26, pp. 487-514.Bourdieu, P. (1999) Language and Symbolic Power, Edited and Introduced by John B. Thompson, Translated by Gino Raymond and

Matthew Adamson, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.Bourdieu, P. and Wacquant, L. (1992) An invitation to Reflexive Sociology, Cambridge: Polity Press.Bouchard, D.F. (1977) Language, counter-memory, practice, selected essays and interviews by Michel Foucault, edited, with an

Introduction, by Bouchard, D.F. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, New York – Foucault, M. (1969): ‘What Is an Author?’, This essay originally appeared in the Bulletin de la Société française de

Philosophie, 63, No. 3 (1969), pp. 73-104. It was delivered as a lecture before the Society at the Collège de France on February 22, 1969, Jean Wahl Presiding.

– Foucault, M. (1971): ’Nietzsche, Genealogy, History’, This essay first appeared in Hommage à Jean Huppolite (Paris: presses Universitaires de France, 1971)

– Foucault, M. and Deleuze, G. (1972): ‘Intellectuals and Power, A conversation between Michel Foucault and Gilles Deleuze’. This discussion was recorded Marc 4, and it was pubslihed in a special issue of L’Arc (No. 49, pp. 3-10), dedicated to Gilles Deleuze.

Boydston, J.A. (ed) (1984) John Dewey: The Later Works, 1925-1953, volume 2, Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press. – John Dewey (1927) The Public and Its Problems

Boyer, M. C. (1983) Dreaming the Rational City: The Myth of American City Planning. Cambridge, MA.: The MIT Press.Braudel, F. (1984) The Perspective of the World, London: Collins.BRBS – Bundesamt für Bauwesen, Raumordnung und Städtebau (1994) European Spatial Planning, Informal Council of Spatial

Planning Ministers, Leipzig, 21/22 September 1994, Results of the Meeting, Bonn, BRBS.Brenner, N. (1998) ‘Between fixity and motion: accumulation, territorial organization and the historical geography of spatial scales’,

Environment and Planning D, 16, pp. 459–481.Brenner, N. (1999a) ‘Beyond state-centrism? Space, territoriality, and geographical scale in globalization studies’, Theory and Scoiety,

28 (1), 39-78.Brenner, N. (1999b) ‘’Globalisation as reterritorialisation: the re-scaling or urban governance in the European Union’, Urban Studies,

36 (3), 431-51.Brogan, J.V. (1996) ‘A Mirror of Enlightenment: The Rational Choice Debate’, Review of Politics, Vol.58, Issue 4 (September 1996), pp.

793-806.Brown, R. and Gilman, A. (1960) ‘The pronouns of power and solidarity’, in P. Giglioli (ed.) Language and Social Context, Hardsworth:

Penguin.Bryman, A. (1988) Quantity and quality in social research, London: Routledge.Bryman, A. (2008) Social Research Methods, Third Edition, Oxford University Press. Burchell, G., Gordon, C., and Miller, P (eds.)

(1991) The Foucault effect, Studies in Governmentality, with two lectures by and an interview with Michel Foucault, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago

– Gordon: Governmental Rationality: An Introduction, Colin Gordon – Foucault: Politics and the study of discourse – originally appeared in the French journal Espirit, no. 371 (May 1968)

pp. 850-874. An English translation first appeared in the journal Salmagundi, no. 20 (Summer-Fall, 1972) pp. 225-48. A revised translation by Colin Gordon originally appeared in Ideology and Consciousness, no. 3 (Spring, 1978). The present version has been further extensively revised.

251

References

– Foucault: Questions of method - The, here with minor corrections translated by Colin Gordon, text by Michel Foucault of this chapter originally appeared in Michelle Perrot, ed. L’impossible prison: Recherches sur le système pénitentiare au XIXe siecle (éditions du Seuil, Paris 1980). This book is an enlarged version of a set of essays in Annales historiques de la Révolution française, 1977

– Foucault, 1978: Governmentality – This lecture, given at the Collège de France in February 1978, is translated from the Italian version, transcribed and edited by Pasquale Pasquino, published in Aut Aut 167-8, September-December 1978.

– Pasquino, P. (1978) Theatrum politicum: The genealogy of captial –police and the state of prosperity, paper to a seminar organized at the Collège de France by Michel Foucault in 1978. A translation by Colin Gordon originally appeared in ideology and Consciousness, no. 4 (autumn 1978). The present translation has been extensively revised.

Bryman, A, and Burgess, R.G. (1994) Analyzing qualitative data, London: Routledge. – Potter, J. and Wetherell, M. : ‘Analyzing discourse’, P.47-66. – Ritchie, J. and Spencer, L.: ‘Qualitative data analysis for applied policy research’, p. 173-194.

Burningham, K. and Cooper, G. (1999) ‘Being constructive: social constructionism and the Environment’, Sociology, 33, 297-316.Burr, V. (1995) An Introduction to Social Constructionism, London: Routledge.Bynens, J. and Van der Lecq, R. (2005) ‘Connecting Europe to its Regions: Territorial Cohesion as a Toolkit for an Interwoven Spatial

Development Approach’, for the AESOP 2005 Vienna Conference, Administration for Spatial Planning of the Ministry of Flanders.

Camagni, R. (1998) ‘Sustainable urban development: definition and reasons for a research programme’, International Journal of Environment and Pollution, 1, p. 6-26.

– Campbell, H. (ed.) (2005) Planning Theory &Practice, Volume 6, Number 3, September 2005. – Böhme, K.: ‘Territorial Cohesion: A Policy Phenomenon in Europe or a Global Issue?’, p. 387-388. – Schön, P.: ‘Territorial Cohesion in Europe?’, p. 389-400 – Hamez, G.: ‘Territorial Cohesion: How to Operationalise and Measure the Concept?’, p. 400-402. – Schmeitz, P.: ‘Don’t Mention the OMC-phrase’, p. 402-404. – Jančič, M.: ‘Why so Shy?’, p. 404-406. – Yamazaki-Honda, R.: ‘Territorial Policy in OECD Countries’, p. 406-409. – Yeh, A.G.O.: ‘Territorial Cohesion: An International Comparison frlom the Perspective of Greater Pearl River Delta,

South China’, P. 409-413.Carroll, L. (1865/1871/2010) Alice in Wonderland & Through the Looking Glass, Bibliolis Books Ltd.Casey, E.S. (1996) The Fate of Place: A philosophical history, Berkley: University if California PressCastells, A. (2000) ‘The role of intergovernmental finance in achieving diversity and cohesion: the case of Spain’, Document de treball

2000/2, Institut d’Economia de Barcelona.Castells, M. (1996) The Information Age: Economy, Society and Culture, Vol. I: The Rise of the Network Society. Oxford: Blackwell

Publishers.Castells, M. (1997) The information Age: Economy, society, culture, vol. II: The power of identity, Oxford: Blackwell.Castells, M. (1999) ‘Grassrooting the space of flows’, Urban Geography 20(4): 294-302.CDCR – Committee on the Development and Conversion of the Regions (2001) Decision – Laying down the creation of a working

group ‘Spatial and urban development’, CDRR/01/0013/06.CEC – Commission of the European Communities (1991) Europe 2000: Outlook for the Development of the Community’s Territory,

Luxembourg: Office for official publications of the European Communities.CEC – Commission of the European Communities (1994) Europe 2000+: co-operation for European territorial development,

Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.CEC – Commission of the European Communities (1996) Services of General Interest in Europe – Communication from the

Commission, COM (1996) 443 final, Brussels.CEC - Commission of the European Communities (1997a) European Spatial Development Perspective, First Official Draft, Luxembourg: Office for official publications of the European Communities.

CEC – Commission of the European Communities (1997b) The EU Compendium of Spatial Planning Systems and Policies (Regional Development Studies 28), Luxembourg: Office for official publications of the European Communities.

CEC – Commission of the European Communities (1998) ‘Report on Community policies and spatial planning’, Working document of the Commission services.

CEC – Commission of the European Communities (1999a) European Spatial Development Perspective: Towards Balanced and Sustainable Development of the Territory of the EU, Luxembourg: Office for official publications of the European Communities.

CEC – Commission of the European Communities (1999b) The Strucutral Funds and their Coordination with the Cohesion Fund. Guidelines for Programmes in the Period 2000-2006, Luxembourg: Office for official publications of the European Communities.

CEC – Commission of the European Communities (2000a), The EU Compendium of Spatial Planning Systems and Policies: France (Regional Development Studies 28E), Luxembourg: Office for official publications of the European Communities, Communication and a draft Recommendation on Integrated Coastal Zone Management

252

References

CEC – Commission of the European Communities (2000b) Strucutral Actions 2000-2006: Commentary and Regulations, Luxembourg: Office for official publications of the European Communities.

CEC – Commission of the European Communities (2000c) Services of General Interest in Europe, Communication from the Commission, COM (2000): 580: final, Luxembourg: Office for Official publications of the European Communities.

CEC – Commission of the European Communities (2000d) TERRA: An Experimental Laboratory in Spatial Planning, Luxembourg, Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.

CEC – Commission of the European Communities (2001a) Unity, solidarity, diversity for Europe, its people and its territory. Second report on Economic and Social Cohesion. Luxembourg: Office for Official publications of the European Communities.

CEC – Commission of the European Communities (2001b) European Governance: A White Paper, Communication from the Commission, COM (2001): 428, Brussels Communication COM(2001)428, see Faludi&Waterhout (2002)

CEC – Commission of the European Communities (2001c) Communication from the Commission – Services of General Interest in Europe, OJ C 17, 19.1.2001: 4.

CEC – Commission of the European Communities (2001d) Report to the Laeken European Council – Services of general Interest, COM(2001)598, 17.10.2001.

CEC – Commission of the European Communities (2001e) Spatial Impacts of Community Policies and Costs of Non-Coordination, Study Carried out by Agence Européenne “Territories and Synergies”, EURE-CONSULT, Nederlands Economisch Instituut and Quarternaire Portugal, Brussels.

CEC – Commission of the European Communities (2003a) Second progress report on economic and social cohesion; Communication from the Commission, COM(2003)/4, Brussels, 30.01.2003

CEC – Commission of the European Communities (2003b) Structural Policies and European Territories: Competitiveness, Sustainable Development and Cohesion in Europe: From Lisbon to Gothenburg, Luxembourg, Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.

CEC – Commission of the European Communities (2003c) An agenda for a Growing Europe: Making the EU Economic System Deliver: Report of an Independent High-Level Study Group Established on the Initiative of the President of the European Commission, Luxembourg, Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.

CEC – Commission of the European Communities (2003d) Report from the Commission on European Governance, Luxembourg: Office for official publications of the European Communities.

CEC – Commission of the European Communities, Directorate General for Regional Policy (2003e) Ex Post Evaluation of 1994-99 Objective 2 Programmes, Synthesis Report, June 2003, Centre for Strategy & Evaluation Services

CEC – Commission of the European Communities (2004a) A new partnership for cohesion convergence competitiveness cooperation, Third Report on Economic and Social Cohesion, COM(2004) 107, Luxembourg.

CEC – Commission of the European Communities (2004b) White Paper on Services of general interest, Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, COM(2004)374final, Brussels.

CEC – Commission of the European Communities (2004c) Proposals for the New Structural Funds Regulations for the Period 2007-2013.

CEC – Commission of the European Communities (2004d) Interim Territorial Cohesion Report (Preliminary Results from ESPON and EU Commission Studies), Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.

CEC – Commission of the European Communities (2004e) Proposal for a Council Regulation laying down the provisions on the European Regional Development Fund, the European Social Fund and the Cohesion Fund (presented by the Commission), Brussels 14-7-2004, COM(2004) 492 Final.

CEC – Commission of the European Communities (2004f) Cohesion Policy: the 2007 watershed, Legislative proposals by the European Commission for the reform of cohesion policy (2007-13 period), inforegio Fact Sheet, Brussels.

CEC – Commission of the European Communities (2004g) Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the European Regional Development Fund, COM(2004) 495 final, Brussels.

CEC – Commission of the European Communities (2005a) Draft Speech by Commissioner Danuta Hübner at the Plenary Session of the European Parliament, Strasbourg, 5 July 2005

CEC – Commission of the European Communities (2005b) Commission Staff working paper, Cohesion Policy and cities: the urban contribution to growth and jobs in the regions, Brussels, 23-11.2005.

CEC – Commission of the European Communities (2005c) Cohesion Policy in Support of Growth and Jobs, Community Strategic Guidelines, 2007-2013, Communication from the Commission (Draft Version), COM(2005) 0299.

CEC – Commission of the European Communities (2005d) Integrated Guidelines for growth and jobs (2005-2008), COM (2005) 141 final, 2005/2007 (CNS), Brussels: CEC.

CEC – Commission of the European Communities (2005e) Growth and Jobs: working together for Europe’s future – A new start for the Lisbon Strategy (Communication to the Spring European Council), Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.

253

References

CEC – Commission of the European Communities (2005f) Working Document of Directorate-General Regional Policy summarising the results of the public consultation on the Community Strategic Guidelines for Cohesion 2007-2013, 7 October 2005, Brussels.

CEC – Commission of the European Communities (2005g) Impact Assessment Guidelines, 15 June, SEC(2005)791, Luxembourg, Office of Official Publication of the European Communities.

CEC – Commission of the European Communities (2005h) Cohesion Policy in Support of Growth and Jobs, Community Strategic Guidelines, 2007-2013, Communication from the Commission, COM(2005) 0299 final.

CEC – Commission of the European Communities (2006) Communication from the Commission, Implementing the Community Lisbon Programme: Social services of general interest in the European Union, COM(2006)177final, Brussels, 26 April 2006.

CEMAT – European Conference of Ministers responsible for Regional Planning of the Member States of the Council of Europe (1999) ‘Guiding Principles for sustainable spatial development of the European continent: preparatory document’, Strasbourg: Council of Europe.

CEMAT – European Conference of Ministers responsible for Regional Planning of the Member States of the Council of Europe (2000) ‘Guiding Principles for sustainable development of the European continent. Adopted by resolution No. 1 on a ten-point programme for greater cohesion among the regions of Europe at the 12th Session of the European Conference of Ministers responsible for Regional Planning on 7-8 September, Hanover’, Strasbourg: Council of Europe.

CEMR – Council of European Municipalities and Regions (undated) Position Paper: The added-value of European Union Cohesion Policy (www.ccre.org/docs/document/pdf/COHESION_EN.pdf, visited 30-9-2003)

CEMR – Council of European Municipalities and Regions (2003a) Resolution 149 (2003) on social cohesion and regions in Europe: regional policies and action with regard to social cohesion, 21 March 2003 (www.coe.int/T/E/Clrae/_5._Texts/2._Adopted_texts/ 2._Resolutions/2003/Res_149_2003_E.pdf?L=E, visited on 11-9-2003)

CEMR – Council of European Municipalities and Regions (2003b) Leipzig Declaration on “Services of General Interest”, Council of European Municipalities and Regions, Eurocities, and Deutscher Staedtetag, 4 April 2003 (www.leipzig-conferences.de/april/pdf/declaration.pdf, visited 21-10-2003)

CEMR – Council of European Municipalities and Regions (2006) Suggested amendments to the draft report on the Community Strategic Guidelines on Cohesion, 2007-2013 COM (2005) 299, Brussels, 22 March 2006.

Chapmann, M. (2000) ‘Planning, Europe and the twenty-first century’, in P, Allmendinger and M. Chapmann (eds) Planning beyond 2000, pp. 205-222, Chichester: Wiley.Chicoye, C. (1992) ‘Regional Impact of the Single European Market in France’, Regional Studies, 26(4), 407-411.Christensen, T. and Lægreid, P. (2001) ‘New Public Management, The effects of contractualism and devolution on political control’,

Public Management Review 3(1), pp. 73-94.Clark, J. and Newman, J. (1997) The Managerial State, London: Sage.Clark, W.C. and Majone, G. (1985) ‘The Critical Appraisal of Scientific Inquiries with Policy Implications’, Science, Technology, &

Human Values, Volume 10, No. 3, Peer Review and Public Policy, Sage Publications, pp. 6-19.Cohen, M., March, J., Olsen, J. (1972) “A Garbage Can Model of Organizational Choice’, Administrative Science Quarterly 17 (March

1972): 1-25.Cole, A. (1998) French Politics and Society, New York: Pretice-Hall.Collinge, C. (1999) Spatial articulation of the state: reworking social relations and social regulation theory, unpublished manuscript,

Centre for Urban and Regional Studies, University of Birmingham.Commission Services (1999) ‘Report on Community policies and spatial planning, Working document of the Commission services’

presented at the ESDP Forum, Brussels, 2-3 February.Commission Staff (2004) Report on the Public Consultation on the Green Paper on services of general interest – Commission Staff

Working Paper, SEC(2004)326, Brussels.Connelly, S. and Richardson, T. (2004) ‘Exclusion: The Necessary Difference between Ideal and Practical Consensus’, Journal of

Environmental Planning and Management, 47(1), Carfax Publishing, pp. 3-17.Connolly, W.E. (1983) The Terms of Political Discourse, 2nd Edition, Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press.Copus, A.K. (2001) ‘From core-periphery to polycentric development: concepts of spatial and aspatial peripherality’, European

Planning Studies, 9(4), pp. 539-552.CoR – Committee of the Regions (1997) Opinion of the Committee of the Regions of 15 January on Spatial Planning in Europe,

Brussels, 24 January 1997.CoR – Committee of the Regions (1999a), Opinion of the Committee of the Regions of 11 March 1999 on the Communication

from the Commission the Council, the European Parliament, the Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, INTERMODALITY AND INTERMODAL FREIGHT TRANSPORT IN THE EUROPEAN UNION A Systems approach to freight transport. Strategies and actions to enhance efficiency, services and sustainability (COM(97) 243 final, COM-3/018, Brussels

254

References

CoR – Committee of the Regions (1999b) Opinion of the Committee of the Regions of 14 January 1999 on the Proposal for a Council Regulation (WC) on support for rural development from the European Agricultural Guidance and Guarantee Fund (EAGGF) (COM(1998) 158 final – 98/0102(CNS)), COM-2/003, Brussels.

CoR – Committee of the Regions (2001a) Opinion of 15 February 2001 on The structure and goals of European regional policy in the context of enlargement and globalisation: opening of the debate, (COM-1/023, Brussels

CoR – Committee of the Regions (2001b) Trans-Europese samenwerking tussen decentrale bestuurslagen, Nieuwe uitdagingen en toekomstige activiteiten voor betere samenwerking, CvdR Studies E-2/2002, Brussel, oktober 2001.

CoR – Committee of the Regions (2002a) Territorial Cohesion in Europe (Draft Final Report), CoR Studies E-6/2002, Brussels.CoR – Committee of the Regions (2002b) Resolution of the Committee of the Regions of 21 November 2002, In preparation for the

Copenhagen European Council, CONST-010, Brussels, 10 December 2002.CoR – Committee of the Regions (2003a) Speech to European Economic and Social Committee, Brussels, 26 February 2003 (europa.

eu.int/futurum/documents/speech/sp260203_en.pdf, visited 25-11-2003)CoR – Committee of the Regions (2003b) Opinion of the Committee of the Regions of 10 April 2003 on Territorial Cohesion, Committee

of the Regions, Commission COTER-012, (european-convention.eu.int/, visited 22-11-2003, CONV 754/03)CoR – Committee of the Regions (2003c) De regional en locale dimensies by de totstandbrenging van nieuwe vormen van governance in

Europa, Luxemburg: Bureau van officiële publicaties der Europese Gemeenschappen.CoR – Committee of the Regions (2005a) Opinion of the Committee of the Regions of 23 February 2005 on the White Paper on services

of general interest, ECOS/040 – CdR 327/2004fin, 15.3.2005.CoR – Committee of the Regions (2005b) Opinion of the Committee of the Regions of 16 November 2005 on the Communication from the

Commission Cohesion Policy in Support of Growth and Jobs: Community Strategic Guidelines, 2007-2013, COTER-038, Brussels.CoR – Committee of the Regions (2006) Conference – Debate, Territorial Dialogue 2006, Preparing the Spring European Council,

making Partnership work – Regional and local authorities for growth and jobs.CoR and CPMR – Committee of the Regions and Conference of Peripheral Maritime Regions of Europe (2003) - Leipzig Conference:

The future of Cohesion Policy, Workshop 1, Territorial Cohesion: A New Concept For An Enlarged Europe?, 5/6 May 2003 (www.cor.eu.int/pdf/activites/ws1reflectionpaperen.pdf, visited 30-9-2003)

Corbett, R., Jacobs, F., Shackleton, M. (2005) The European Parliament, 6th edition, London, Harper.Cowles, M.G, Caporaso, J. and Risse, T. eds. (2001) Transforming Europe, Europeanization and Domestic Change. Cornell University

Press, Ithaca and London. – Checkel, J.T., ‘The Europeanization of Citizenship?’ – Risse, T., ‘An European Identity? Europeanization and the Evolution of Nation-State Identities’

Council of the European Union (2005) Financial Perspective 2007-2013, Note from the Presidency to the European Council, Brussels, 19 December 2005, 1591/05, CADREFIN 268, December.

Cox, K. (1996) ‘Editorial: the difference that scale makes’, Political Geography, 15(8), pp. 667-671.Cox, K. (1998) ‘Spaces of engagement, space of dependence and the politics of scale, or: looking for local politics’, Environment and

Planning A, 23(2), pp. 197-214.CPMR – Conference of Peripheral Maritime Regions of Europe (undated) Towards a New Regional Policy, CPMR’s proposals in

reaction to The Second Report on Economic and Social Cohesion: <<10 questions for debate>>, Document adopted by the Political Bureau in Helsinki, 3 July 2001 (www.lf.svekom.se/tru/NPO/Sammanhallningspolitik/downloadsammanhallning/CPMR.pdf, visited 13-11-2003)

CPMR – Conference of Peripheral Maritime Regions of Europe (2001), Memorandum: The role of the regions in the new European Governance, For the attention of the Belgian Presidency of the European Union, Member States and European institutions in view of the Laeken Summit in December, July 2001.

CPMR – Conference of Peripheral Maritime Regions of Europe (2002a) Tasks, policies and competencies of the European Union: what peripheral maritime regions expect from Europe, CPMR’s contribution to the first stage of the work led by the Convention on the Future of Europe (March 2002 July 2002); Summary of a survey conducted among 146 member regions of the CPMR, adopted by the CPMR Political Bureau (Schwerin, 14 May 2002), May 2002.

CPMR – Conference of Peripheral Maritime Regions of Europe (2002b) Study on the Construction of a Polycentric and Balanced Development Model for the European Territory, Conference of Peripheral and Maritime Regions of Europe, Rennes.

CPMR – Conference of Peripheral Maritime Regions of Europe (2003) Secretary General Gizard, X. – Don’t mess with my Constitution, June 2003 (www.cpmr.org/Documents/Editoriaux/Edito_06_03_GB.pdf, visited 19-10-2003)

CPMR – Conference of Peripheral Maritime Regions of Europe (2004) Four years of campaigning for economic, social and territorial cohesion, 19-2-2004.

CPMR – Conference of Peripheral Maritime Regions of Europe (2005) The Community Strategic Guidelines must support Territorial Cohesion, Opinion of the CPMR General Secretariat, 16 September 2005.

CSD – Committee on Spatial Development (1994) ‘Principles for a European Spatial Development Policy, Leipzig, 4 October 1994’, CSD.

255

References

CSD – Committee on Spatial Development (1997a) European Spatial Development Perspective: First Official Draft, Noordwijk, CSD.CSD – Committee on Spatial Development (1997b) ‘Concept on the establishment of the European Spatial Planning Observatory

Network (ESPON)’, Draft for the CSD Meeting, November, Brussels.CSD – Committee on Spatial Development (1998) ‘European Spatial Development Perspective – Complete Draft, Presented at the

Informal Meeting of Ministers responsible for Spatial Planning of the Member States of the European Union, Glasgow, June 8 1998’, CSD.

CSD – Committee on Spatial Development (1999) ‘European Spatial Development Perspective – Towards Balanced and Sustainable Development of the Territory of the EU, Presented at the Informal Meeting of Ministers Responsible for Spatial Planning of the Member States of the European Union, Potsdam May 110/11 1999’, Committee for Spatial Development.

Dabinett, G. and Richardson, T. (1999) ‘The European Spatial Approach: the role of power and knowledge in strategic spatial planning and policy evaluation’, Evaluation 5 (2): 220-237.

Dabinett, G. and Richardson, T. (2005) ‘The Europeanization of Spatial Strategy: Shaping Regions and Spatial Justice through Governmental Ideas’, International Planning Studies, Volume 10, No. 3, Routledge, pp. 201-218.

DATAR (2000) ‘Les lois : quelques réponses à propos de lois Voynet et Chevénement’, Territoires 2020 : Revue d’études et de prospective 1 : 24-30

Davies, H.W.E. (1994) ‘Towards a European planning system?’ Planing Practive and Research 9(1): 63-69.Davies, A.R. (1999) ‘Where do we go from here? Environmental focus groups and planning policy’, Local Environment, 4, 295-316.Davoudi, S. (1999) ‘Making sense of the ESDP’, Town and Country Planning 68(12): 367-369.Davoudi, S. (2003) ‘’Polycentricity in European spatial planning: From an analytical tool to a normative agenda’, European Planning

Studies, 11, p. 979-999.Davoudi, S. (2004) ‘Territorial Cohesion – an agenda that’s gaining momentum’, Town and Country Planning, Vol. 73, No. 7, London,

Town and Country Planning Association, pp. 224-227.Davoudi, S. (2005a) ‘Understanding Territorial Cohesion’, Planning, Practice & Research, Vol. 20, No. 4, pp. 433-441, November 2005.Davoudi, S. (2005b) ‘ESPON – past, present and future’, in: Town & Country Planning, Vol. 74(3), pp. 100-102.Davoudi, S. (2006) ‘Evidence-Based Planning, Rhetoric and Reality’, disP, 165, 2, pp. 14-24.Davoudi, S. and Healey, P. (1995) ‘City challenge: sustainable process or temporary gesture?’, Environment and Planning C: Government

and Policy, 13(1), pp. 79-95.Davoudi, S. and Wishart, M. (2005) ‘Polycentric Turn in the Irish Spatial Strategy’, Built Environment, 31(2), pp. 122-132.DCRGA – Department of Community, Rural and Gaeltacht Affairs (2004) Territorial Cohesion, Meeting new challenges in an enlarged

EU, Report of Conference organised by the Department of Community, Rural and Gaeltacht Affairs in conjunction with the Directorate General for Regional Policy of the European Commission, in Na Forbacha, County Galway, Ireland 25-27 May, 2004 under the auspices of the Irish Presidency of the European Union 2004.

– Ó Cinnèide, M.: ‘Executive Summary: Meeting the Challenges of Territorial Cohesion in an Enlarged European Union’. – Bennett, J.: ‘Introduction’. – Ó Cuiv, T.: ‘A New Partnership for Cohesion’. – Leygues, J-C: ‘Territorial Cohesion’. – Ó Cinnèide, M and Bennett, J.: ‘Proposed Reforms of EU Cohesion Policy 2007-2013’. – Almkvist, A.: ‘Small Islands: Prospects in Areas with Permanent Constraints’. – Hache, J-D.: ‘The Island Regions in Europe and Territorial Cohesion’. – Olofsson, A.: ‘Report on Workshop 1: Strengthening Territorial Cohesion – Analysis of Constraints and Opportunities’. – Davoudi, S.: ‘Beyond Urban-Rural Dichotomy’. – Walsh, J.: ‘Spatial Planning for Territorial Cohesion: Linking the Urban and Rural Domains’. – Tosics, I.: ‘Sustainable Development and Economic Competitiveness in Metropolitan Regions’. – Mehlbye, P.: ‘Territorial Cohesion and Polycentrism’. – Tenreiro, C.: ‘Some Considerations about State Aid as a Possible Factor of Territorial Cohesion’. – Guth, M.: ‘Innovation, Social Inclusion and Coherent Regional Development: A New Diamond for a Socially Inclusive

Policy in Regions’. – Cristodorescu, G.: ‘Regional Innovation: A Driver for Territorial Cohesion in Romania’. – Murray, M.: ‘Report on Workshop 3: Drivers for Strengthening Territorial Cohesion’.

Dean, M. (1999) Governmentality, Power and Rule in Modern Society, SAGE Publications, London (Reprint 2003)De Cervantes Saavedra, M. (1605) Don Quichote, deel I, vertaling van C.U. Schuller tot Peursum, L.J. Veen’s Uitgeversmaatschappij

N.V., Amsterdam.De Man, P. (1983) Blindness and Insight, Essays in the Rhetoric of Contemporary Criticism, Second Edition, Routledge.Deleuze, G. (1990) ‘Society of Control’, L’autre journal, Nr. I, Mai.Deleuze, G. (2000) Foucault, translated and edited by Seán Hand, foreword by Paul Bové, Minneapolis London, Univerisity of

Minnesota Press

256

References

Demeritt, D.B. (1996) ‘Social theory and the reconstruction of science and geography’, Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 21, 484-503.

Derrida, J. (1967) De la Grammatologie, Paris: Minuit.DG (Directorate General) XVI (1999) ‘The ESDP – a strategy for balanced and sustainable development of the European Union:

synthesis report of the Transnational Seminars’, presented at the ESDP Forum, Brussels, 2-3 February.DG Regio (2004) Interim Territorial Cohesion Report: Preliminary Results of ESPON and Commission Studies, Luxembourg, Office for

Official Publications of the European Communities.DG Regio (undated) ‘Cohésion territoriale : situation et perspectives’, unpublished.DG Regio and DG Employment (2005) Cohesion policy in support of growth and jobs, Community Strategic Guidelines, 2007-2013,

Non-paper, Brussels: DG Regio.Diez, T. (1999) ‘Speaking “Europe”: The Politics of Integration Discourse’, Journal of European Public Policy, 6(4): 598-613.Diez, T. (2001) ‘Europe as a Discursive Battleground, Discourse Analysis and European Integration Studies’, Cooperation and Conflict,

Volume 36(1)NISA, London, Thousand Oaks, CA, New Dehli: SAGE Publications, pp. 5-38.Diken, B. (1998) Strangers, Ambivalence and Social Theory. Aldershot: Ashgate.Dreyfus, H. (1982) ‘Why Studies of Human Capacities modelled on Ideal Natural Science can never Achieve their Goal’, revised

edition of a paper presented at the Boston Colloquium for the Philosophy of Science, October 1982 (undated).Dreyfus, H. and Dreyfus, S. (1986) Mind over Machine: The Power of Human Intuition and Expertise in the Era of the Computer, New

York: Free Press.Dreyfus, H.L. and Rabinow, P. (1982) Michel Foucault: Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics, 2nd Edition, With an Afterword by and

an interview with Michel Foucault, The University of Chicago Press – Foucault: Afterword ‘The Subject and Power’

DTI, HTM and ODPM – Department of Trade and Industry, Her Majesty’s Treasury and The Office of the Deputy Prime Minister (2003), A Modern Regional Policy for the United Kingdom, London, DTI.

Dühr, S. and Nadin, V. (2005) ‘Territorial Cohesion and the UK Presidency’, Town and Country Planning, Vol. 74. No. 3. London, Town and Country Planning Association, pp. 112-115.

Duinen, L. van (2004) Planning imagery: The emergence and Development of New Planning Concept in Dutch National Spatial Policy, PhD University of Amsterdam.

Dunsire, A. (1996) ‘Tipping the balance: autopoiesis and governance. Administration and Society, 28 (3), 2999-334.Dupuy, G. (2000) ‘L’aménagement du territoire vu par un aménageur’, Territoires 2020: Revue d’études et de prospective, Nr.1, 11-13.Dutch Presidency (2004) Exploiting Europe’s territorial diversity for sustainable economic growth: Discussion paper for the EU informal

ministerial meeting on territorial cohesion, November 29, Rotterdam.Eagleton, T. (1983) Literary Theory: An Introduction, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.East of England (2005) ‘East of England Position on the Future of Territorial Cooperation: a Response to the European Commission’s

Proposed Draft Regulations of 15 July 2004 and European Parliament Position of 5 July 2005’.EcoSoc European Economic and Social Committee (2005) Opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee on the White

Paper on services of general interest, TEN/196 – CESE 121/2005, 9.2.2005.ECTP – European Council of Town Planners (2004) Draft Report: What Does Europe Want From the Next ESDP?, Seminar 24-10-

2003, London.Edelman, M. (1988) Constructing the Political Spectacle, Chicago: Chicago University Press.EEC – European Economic Comminuty (1957) Treaty establishing the European Economic Community, Rome.Eemeren, F. van, Grootendorst, R., Jackson, s. and Jacons, S. (1997) ‘Argumentation’, in T. van Dijk (ed.) Discourse as Structure and

Process, London: Sage.EESC (1998) ‘Advies van het Europees Economisch en Sociaal Comité over het Europees Ruimtelijk Ontwikkelingsperspectief (EROP) –

Eerste officiële ontwerp”’Eeten, M. van (2001) ‘The challenge ahead for deliberative democracy: in reply to Weale’, Science and Public Policy, 28, pp. 423-426.EG – Europese Gemeenschap (1999) Zesde periodiek verslag over de social-economische situatie en de ontwikkeling van de regio’s van

de Europese Unie, Brussel.Eising, R. and Kohler-Koch, B. (1999) ‘Governance in the European Union: a comparative assesment’, in B. Kohler-Kock and R. Eising

(eds) The Transformation of Governance in the European Union (ECPR Studies in European Policy Science 12), London/New York: Routledge: 267-285.

Elster, J. (1989) Nuts and Bolts for the Social Sciences, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Elster, J. (2000) ‘Rational Choice History: A Case of Excessive Ambition’, The Americn Political Science Review, Vol.94, No.3, pp. 685-

695.Elwood, S.A. and Martin, D.G. (2000) ‘“Placing” Interviews: Location and Scales of Power in Qualitative Research’, Professional

Geographer, 52(4), Blackwell Publishers, pp. 649-657.

257

References

Emigh, R.J. (1997) ‘The Power of Negative Thinking: The Use of Negative Case Methodology in the Development of Sociological Theory’, Theory and Society, Volume 26, No. 5, JSTOR, pp. 649-684

EP – European Parliament, Committee on Regional Policy and Regional Planning (1983) Report on Regional Policy and Regional Planning on a European regional planning scheme, Al-1026-83, Rapportuer: Paul-Hendry Gendebien, Strasbourg.

EP – European Parliament, Committee on Regional Policy, Transport and Tourism (1998) Rapport d’initiative L’aménagement du Territoire et le Schéma de Développement de L’Espace Communautaire (SDEC), Rapporteur: Novo Belenguer (A4-0206/98), Strasbourg.

EP – European Parliament (1999a) Opinion of the Committee on Region al Policy, Transport and Tourism for the Committee on Constitutional Affairs on the European Parliament’s proposals for the Intergovernmental Conference, In: Report on the European Parliament’s proposals for the Intergovernmental Conference.

EP – European Parliament, DG for Committees and Delegations (1999b) Committee on Regional Policy, Transport and Tourism, Activity Reports 1994-1999, Notice to members, 7.7.1999, Brussels.

EP – European Parliament (2002a) Report on the first progress report from the Commission on economic and social cohesion (COM(2002)46-C5-0198/2002-2002/2094(COS)), Committee on Regional Policy, Transport and Tourism; Rapporteur Elisabeth Schroedter, European Parliament 1999-2004 Session Document, Final A5-0354/2002.

EP – European Parliament (2002b) European Parliament resolution on the Commission’s Second Report to the Council, the European Parliament, the Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions on economic and social cohesion, P5_TA(2002)0060, Rapporteur: Francesco Musotto, Strasbourg.

EP – European Parliament (2002b) European Parliament resolution on the management of regional policy and structural funds, P2_TA(2002)0059, Rapporteur: Samuli Pohjamo, Strasbourg.

EP – European Parliament, Committee on Regional Development (2004a) Report on the Third report on economic and social cohesion (COM(2004) 107 – C5-0092/2004 – 2004/2005(INI)) Committee on Regional Policy, Transport and Tourism, Rapporteur: Konstantinos Hatzidakis.

EP – European Parliament, Committee on Regional Development (2004b) Rules of Procedure, 16th edition, QA-61-04-824-EN-C, Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg.

EP – European Parliament, Committee on Regional Development (2004c) Cross-border cooperation, economic and social cohesion: European grouping of territorial cooperation EGTC, COD/2004/0168, rapporteur: Jan Olbrycht, Luxembourg.

EP – European Parliament, Committee on Regional Development (2005a) Draft Report on the Role of Territorial Cohesion in Regional Development, 2004/2256 (INI), Rapporteur: Ambroise Guellec, Strasbourg.

EP – European Parliament, Committee on Regional Development (2005b) Amendments to the Draft report ‘The role of territorial cohesion in regional development’, 2004/2256 (INI), Rapporteur: Ambroise Guellec, Strasbourg.

EP – European Parliament (2005c) Report on the role of territorial cohesion in regional development, A6-0251/2005, Rapporteur: Ambroise Guellec, Strasbourg.

EP – European Parliament (2005d) Territorial Cohesion in Regional Development, European Parliament resolution on the role of territorial cohesion in regional development, P6_TA-PROV(2005/0358), Strasbourg.

EP – European Parliament (2005e) Report on stronger partnership for the outermost regions, Session Document, Final A6-02446/2005, Rapporteur: Sérgio Marques, Strasbourg.

EP – European Parliament, Committee on Regional Development (2005f) Report on a stronger partnership for the outermost regions, Session Document, Final A6-0246/2005, Rapporteur: Sérgio Marques, Strasbourg.

EP – European Parliament, Committee on Regional Development (2005g) Report on the urban dimension in the context of enlargement, Session Document, Final A6-0251/2005, Rapporteur: Jean Marie Beaupuy, Strasbourg.

EP – European Parliament, Committee on Regional Development (2005h) Report on the role of direct State aid as a tool of regional development, Session document, Final A6-0364/2005, Rapporteur: Miloš Koterec, Strasbourg.

EP – European Parliament, Committee on Regional Development (2005i) Audition D’Experts et Échanges de Vues “Le Rôle de la Cohésion Territoriale dans le Développement Régional”, Brussels.

EP – European Parliament, Committee on Regional Development (2005j) Interim report on the proposal for a Council Regulation laying down general provisions on the European Regional Development Fund, the European Social Fund and the Cohesion Fund, Session Document, Final A6-0177/05, Rapporteur: Konstantinos Hatzidakis.

EP – European Parliament, Committee on Regional Development (2005k) Interim report on the proposal for a Council Regulation establishing a Cohesion Fund, Session Document, Final A6-0178/05, Rapporteur: Alfonso Andria, Strasbourg.

EP – European Parliament, Committee on Regional Development (2005l) Report on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the European Regional Development Fund, Session Document, Final A6-0184/2005, Rapporteur: Claudio Fava.

EP – European Parliament, Committee on Regional Development (2005m) Audition du 30 mars sur le rapport d’initiative de M. Guellec sur “ Le Rôle de la Cohésion Territoriale dans le Développement Régional”, unpublished internal document, Brussels.

258

References

EP – European Parliament, Committee on Regional Development (2006) Working document on the strategic guidelines (cohesion policy) for the period 2007-2013, Rapporteur : Constanze Krehl, Brussels.

ESPON – European Spatial Planning Observatory Network (2001) Integrated tools for European spatial development, project 3.1, 2002-2004, First Interim Report.

ESPON – European Spatial Planning Observatory Network (2004) ESPON in Progress: Preliminary Results by Autumn 2003, Esch-sur-Alzette (LUX), ESPON Secretariat.

ESPON – European Spatial Planning Observatory Network (2005a) ESPON Project 3.2 – Spatial Scenario’s and Orientations in relation to the ESDP and Cohesion Policy, Second Interim Report, 2004-2006, Luxembourg.

ESPON – European Spatial Planning Observatory Network (2005b) In search of territorial potentials, Midterm results by spring 2005, Luxembourg.

ESPON – European Spatial Planning Observatory Network (2006) Mapping regional competitiveness and cohesion: European outlook on territorial diversities, ESPON Briefing 2, March 2006, Esch zur Alzette: ESPON Coordination Unit.

ESPON 3.2 – European Spatial Planning Observatory Network, Project 3.2 (2005) Second Interim Report on Spatial Scenarios and Orientations in Relation to the ESDP and EU Cohesion Policy, available at www.espon.lu/online/documentation/projects/cross_thematic/cross_thematic_134.html.

Eser, T.W. and Konstadakopulos (2000) ‘Power shifts in the European Union? The case of spatial planning’, European Spatial Planning 8(6): 783-798.

EU Council – European Council, Ministers for Spatial Development (2004) EU informal ministerial meeting on territorial cohesion, Presidency Conclusions, Rotterdam.

EU Council – European Council, Ministers for Spatial Development (2005a) Scoping document and summary of political messages for an assessment of the Territorial State and Perspectives of the European Union, Towards a stronger European territorial cohesion in the light of the Lisbon and Gothenburg ambitions, Luxembourg.

EU Council – European Council, Ministers for Spatial Development (2005b) EU Informal Ministerial Meeting on Territorial Cohesion, Presidency Conclusions, Luxembourg. Policy and cities’, 14 February 2006.

EURADA (undated) Contribution to Future Discussions on Modernising the EU Budget, Memo to the Secretariat.EURADA (2004) EURADA 20004 Activity Report.EURADA (2005) EURADA 20005 Activity Report.EUROCITIES (2004) ‘EUROCITIES Response to the Third Cohesion Report’, 7 May 2004.EUROCITIES (2006) EUROCITIES Response to the Commission’s working paper on ‘Cohesion Policy and cities’, 14 February 2006.European Council (2006) COUNCIL DECISION of 20 February 2006 on Community strategic guidelines for rural development

(programming period 2007 to 2013), (2006/144/EC), Official Journal of the European Union, 25.2.2006.European Country Side Movement (2003) Proposal of amendments by the European Countryside Movement to the Draft text of the

Articles 1 to 16 of the Treaty establishing a constitution for Europe, Conv. 528/3, February 2003.Europese Gemeenschappen (2003) Verdrag tot vaststelling van een Ontwerp-Grondwet voor Europa, voorgelegd aan de Europese

Raad, in Thessaloniki bijeen, 20 juni 2003, Europese Conventie, Luxemburg: Bureau voor officiële publicaties der Europese Gemeenschappen.

EU informal ministerial meeting on territorial cohesion (2004a) Exploiting Europe’s territorial diversity for sustainable economic growth, discussion paper for the EU informal ministerial meeting on territorial cohesion, Rotterdam, November 29, 2004.

EU informal ministerial meeting on territorial cohesion (2004b) Presidency conclusions, Rotterdam, 29th of November 2004.EU-IMM – EU Informal Ministerial Meeting on Territorial Cohesion (2004c) Rotterdam, 29/11/2005.EU-IMM – EU Informal Ministerial Meeting on Territorial Cohesion (2005) Luxembourg 20-21/05/2005, Presidency Conclusions.EUROCITIES (2004) Response to the Third Cohesion Report, 7 May 2004EUROCITIES (2006) Response to the Commission’s working paper on ‘Cohesion Policy and cities’, 14 February 2006.European Commission (1999) Communication from the Commission, The Structural Funds and their Coordination with the Cohesion

Fund. Guidelines for Programmes in the Period 2000-06., COM (1999) 344 final, Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg.

European Commission (2000) Communication from the Commission to the Member States of 28 April 2000 laying down guidelines for a Community initiative concerning trans-European cooperation intended to encourage harmonious and balanced development of the European territory, INTERREG III, COM (2000) 1101 final, Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg.

Fairclough, N. (1992) Discourse and Social Change, Cambridge: Polity Press.Fairclough, N. (2003) Analysing Discourse, Textual analysis for social research, Routledge, London and New York.Fairclough, N. Jessop, R. and Sayer, a. (2002) ‘Critical Realism and Semiosis’, Journal of Critical Realism 5(1): 2-10.Faludi, A. (1973), A Reader in Planning Theory, Oxford: Pergamon.

– Lindblom, C. (1959): ‘The Science of Muddling Through’.Faludi, A. (1996) ‘Framing with images’, Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 23: 93-108.

259

References

Faludi, A. (2000a) ‘Strategic planning in Europe: institutional aspects’, in W. Salet and A. Faludi (eds) The Revival of Strategic Spatial Planning, pp. 243-258, Amsterdam: Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences.

Faludi, A. (2000b) ‘The Performance of Spatial Planning’, Planning Practice &Research, 15, p. 299-318.Faludi, A. (2001) ‘The application of the European Spatial Development Perspective: evidence from the North-West Metropolitan

Area’, European Planing Studies 9 (5): 667-679.Faludi, A. (ed.) (2002a) European Spatial Planning, Cambridge, MA, Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.Faludi, A. (2002b) ‘Positioning European Spatial Planning’, European Planning Studies, 10(7), Carfax Publishing, Taylor & Francis

Ltd., pp. 897-909Faludi, A. (2003a) ‘Territorial Cohesion: Old (French) Wine in New Bottles?’, paper presented at the Third joint ACSP-AESOP

Congress, 9-12 July, Leuven, Belgium.Faludi, A. (2003b) ‘Unfinished business: European spatial planning in the 2000s’, in A. Faludi (ed.), ‘The application of the European

Spatial Development Perspective’ (Special Issue), Town Planning Review, 74, p. 1-9.Faludi, A. (2004a) ‘Territorial Cohesion: A Polycentric Process for a Polycentric Europe’, Research Team Governacne and Places (GAP),

Working Paper Series 2004/03, Nijmegen, April 2001, University of Nijmegen.Faludi, A. (2004b) ‘Territorial cohesion: old (french) wine in new bottles?’, Urban Studies, Vol. 41, No. 7, London: Routledge, pp.

1349-1367.Faludi, A. (2004c) ‘The Open Method of Co-ordination and ‘Post-regulatory’ Territorial Cohesion Policy’, European Planning Studies,

Vol. 12, No. 7, London: Carfax Publishing.Faludi, A. (2004d) ‘Spatial Planning Traditions in Europe: Their Role in the ESDP process’, International Planning Studies 76(1), p.

107-118. – Faludi, A. (2004e) ‘The European Spatial Development Perspective and North-west Europe: Application and the Future’,

European Planning Studies, 12(3), Carfax Publishing, Taylor & Francis, pp. 391-408 – Faludi, A. (ed.) (2005a) special issue of Town Planning Review, 76 (1) 2005. – Faludi, A.: ‘Territorial Cohesion: An unidentified political objective, Introduction to the special issue’, p. 1-14 – Zonneveld, W. and Waterhout, B.: ‘Visions on Territorial Cohesion’, p. 15-28. – Polverari, L. and Bachtler, J.: ‘The contribution of European Structural Funds to territorial cohesion’, p. 29-42. – Schäfer, N.: ‘Coordination in European spatial development, Whose responsibility?’, p. 43-56. – Mercier, G.: ‘Which territorial cohesion policy for the new EU members?, The example of Slovakia’, p. 57-68. – Tewdwr-Jones, M. and Morais Mourato, J.: ‘Territorial cohesion, economic growth and the desire for European ‘balanced

competitiveness’, p. 69-80. – Gestel, T. van and Faludi, A.: ‘Towards a European Territorial Cohesion Assessment Network, A bright future for

ESPON?’, p. 81-92. – Janin Rivolin, U.: ‘Cohesion and subsidiarity, Towards good territorial governance in Europe’, p. 93-106 – Faludi, A.: ‘Polycentric territorial cohesion policy’, p. 107-118.

Faludi, A. (2005b) Territorial Cohesion Policy and the European Model of Society, Paper for the congress of the Association of European Schools of Planning, ‘The Dream of a Greater Europe’, Vienna 13-17 July.

Faludi, A. (2005c/2006) ‘From European spatial development to territorial cohesion policy’, Regional Studies 40 , p. 667-678.Faludi, A. (2005d) ‘Europäisierung der Raumordnung: Wie Raumordnung zur politik des territorialen Zusammenhalts wurde, in

Jarass, H. (ed.): Europäisierung der Raumplannung, Vol. 26, Berlin, Lexxion, pp. 108-127.Faludi, A. (ed.) (2007) Territorial cohesion and European model of society, the Lincoln Institute for Land Policy: Cambridge, MA.

– Faludi, A. (2005): Foreword – Robert, J.: ‘The origins of territorial cohesion and the vagaries of its trajectory’ – Waterhout, B.: ‘Territorial Cohesion: Discourses Underlying’ – Peyrony, J.: ‘Territorial cohesion and the European model of society: French perspectives’ – Davoudi, S.: ‘Territorial cohesion, European social model and spatial policy research’ – Bachtler, J. and Polverari, L.: ‘Delivering Territorial Cohesion: European Cohesion Policy and the European Model of

Society’ – Camagni, R.: ‘The rationale for territorial cohesion and the place of territorial development policies in the European

Model of Society’ – ‘Drevet, J-F.: ‘Chasing a Moving Target: Territorial Cohesion Policy in a Europe with Uncertain Borders’ – Tatzberger, G.: ‘Polycentrism and Territorial Cohesion in the Vienna-Bratislava-Györ Triangle: The European Model of

Society in Action’ – Zonneveld, W.: ‘Unraveling Europe’s spatial structure through spatial visioning: Is there a European territorial model

of society?’Faludi, A. and Peyrony, J. (2001) The French pioneering role, in A. Faludi (Ed.) Regulatory competition and Co-operation in European

Spatial Planning (Special Issue), Built Environment, Vol. 27, No. 4, Alexander Press, Oxford, 253-262.

260

References

Faludi, A. and Salet, W. (eds.) (2000) The Revival of Strategic Spatial Planning, Amsterdam: Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences.

– Faludi, A., ‘Strategic Spatial Planning in Europe: institutional aspects’. – Hajer, M., ‘Transnational networks as transnational policy discourse: some observations on the politics of spatial

development in Europe’Faludi, A. and Valk, A. van der (1994) Rule and Order. Dutch planning Doctrine in the Twentieth Century, Dordrecht/Boston/London:

Kluwer Academic Publishers. Faludi, A. and Waterhout, B. (2002) The Making of the European Spatial Development Perspective – No Masterplan, London/New York:

Routledge.Faludi, A and Waterhout, B. (2005) ‘The Usual Suspects: The Rotterdam EU Informal Ministerial Meeting on Territorial Cohesion’,

Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Vol. 96, No. 3, Oxford: Koninklijk Nederlands Aardrijkskundig Genootschap, Blackwell Publishing Ltd., pp. 328-333.

Featherstone, M. (1991) Consumer Culture and Postmodernism, London: Sage.Featherstone, K. and Radaelli, C.M. eds. (2003) The Politics of Europeanization, Oxford University Press, New York.Federal Ministry for Regional Planning, Building and Urban Development (1993) Guidelines for Regional Planning: General Principles

for Spatial Development in the Federal Republic of Germany, Bonn.Ferneley, E. and Bell, F. (2006) ‘Using bricolage to integrate business and information technology innovation in SMEs’, Technovation

26 (2006) 232-241, Elsevier.Ferry, M. and Gross, F. (2005) The future of territorial cooperation in an enlarged EU, Conference Discussion paper No. 4, Benchmarking

Regional Policy, 2nd International Conference, EPRC (April).Fischer, F. (1990) Technocracy and the Politics of Expertise, London: Sage.Fischer, F. and Forester, J. (eds) (1993) The argumentative Turn in Policy Analysis and Planning, London: UCL Press.

– Fischer, F.: ‘Policy discourse and the politics of Washington think tanks’. – Hoppe, R.: ‘Political judgement and the policy cycle: the case of ethnicity policy arguments in the Netherlands’. – Hajer, A.M.: ‘Discourse coalitions and the institutionalisation of practice: the case of acid rain in Great Britain’. – Dryzek, J.: ‘Policy analysis and planning: from science to argument’.

Fischler, R. (1995) ‘Strategy and history in professional practice: planning as world making’, in: H. Liggett and D. C. Perry (Eds) Spatial Practices: Critical Explorations in Social/ Spatial Theory, pp. 13–58. London: Sage.

Fischler, R. (1998) ‘Toward a genealogy of planning: zoning and the Welfare State’, Planning Perspectives 13, pp. 389-410.Fleischer, T. (2004) Comments on services of general interest and territorial and social cohesion; Contribution to the international

conference on “Services of General Interest in an Enlarged European Union”, organised in Budapest, by the TEPSA members Study Group for European Policies (Belgium), Institute for World Economics (Hungary) and the Initiative pour des services d’utilité publique en Europe (Belgium) with the support of the European Commission on 21-22 October, 2004.

Flyn, T. (1993) ‘Foucault’s mapping of history’, in G. Gutting (ed.) The Cambridge Companion to Foucault, pp. 28-46, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Flyvbjerg, B. (1998) Rationality and Power: Democracy in Practice, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Flyvbjerg, B. (2001) Making Social Science Matter, Why social inquiry failed and how it can matter again, Cambridge: Cambridge

University Press.Flyvbjerg, B. (2002) ‘Bringing Power to Planning Research: One Researcher’s Praxis Story’, Journal of Planning Education and Research,

volume 21, No. 4, pp. 353-366.Flyvberg, B., Bruzelius, N., and Rothengatter, W. (2003) Megaprojects and Risk: An anatomy of power, Cambridge: Cambridge

University Press.Foreign Office (2005) White Paper: Prospects for the EU, London, Foreign Office.Forester, J. (1989) Planning in the face of power, Berkeley: University of California Press.Foucault, M. (1969) The Archaeology of Knowledge, London: Routledge.Foucault, M. (1972) The Archaeology of Knowledge, New York: Pantheon.Foucault, M. (1973) The Order of Things: an Archaeology of the Human Sciences, New York: Vintage.Foucault, M. (1977) Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison, London: Routledge.Foucault, M. (1979a) Discipline and Punish: The birth of the Prison, New York: Vintage.Foucault, M. (1979b) Omnes et Singulatim: Towards a Criticism of ‘Politcal Reason’, The Tanner Lectures on Human Values, Delivered at Stanford University, October 10 and 16.Foucault, M. (1980a) Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972-1977, Brighton: Harvester.

– Foucault, M. (1977): ‘Le jeu de Michel Foucault’ in Ornicar? 10 July. The journal is published by members of the Department of Psychoanalysis at the University of Vincennes. A few preliminary remarks are omitted from this translation.

Foucault, M. (1980b) History of Sexuality, volume I, New York: Vintage.

261

References

Foucault, M. (1985) The Use of Pleasure, translation by Robert Hurley, New York: Vintage Books.Foucault, M. (1990) The History of Sexuality, volume 1 An introduction, London: Penguin.Foucault, M. (1994) ‘La gouvernementalité’, In Dits et écrits, Volume 3, Paris: Gallimard, Fourth lecture of the course “Securité,

territoire et population”, delivered at the College de France, 1 February 1978, First published in Italian translation in Aut-aut, no. 167-168 (September-December 1978): 12-29.

Foucault, M. (1997a) The Politics of Truth, Edited by S. Lotringer and L. Hochroth, Semiotext(e) – Foucault, M. (1978) “What is Critique” is the text of the lecture given to the French Society of Philosophy on May 27,

1978, and published in the Bulletin de la Société française de philosophie, t. LXXXIV, 1990. Transcript by Monique Emery, revised by Suzanne Delorme, Christian Menasseyre, François Azouvi, Jean-Marie Beyssade and Dominique Séglard. Translated by Lysa Hochroth.

Foucault, M. (1997b) Ethics, Subjectivity and Truth, The Essential Works of Michel Foucault 1954-1984, volume I, edited by Paul Rabinow (New York: New Press.

Maurice Florence, “Foucault”.Foucault, M. (2003) “Society Must Be Defended”, Lectures at the Collège de France, 1975-76, Edited by Mauro Bertani and Alessandro

Dontana, General Editors: François Ewald and Alessandro Fontana, English Series Editor: Arnold I. Davidson, Translated by David Macey, Picador, New York

Foucault, M. (2006) History of Madness, translated by J. Murphy and J. Khalfa, edited by J. Khalfa, London and New York: Routledge.Frege, G. (1892) Uber Sinn und Bedeutung. Zeitschrift fur Philosophie und philosophische Kritik, 100: 192-205. English translation in

Geach & Black, 1988.French Presidency (2000) Spatial Development: Summary Report – Synthesis, Délegation à l’aménagement du territoire et à l’action

régionale (DATAR), Paris.Friedmann, J. (1987) Planning in the public domain: from knowledge to action, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Friedmann, J. (1998) ‘Planning Theory revisited’, European Planning Studies 6(3), pp. 245-253.Geach, P. and Black, M. (eds) (1988) Translations from the Philosophical Writings of Gottlob Frege. Oxford: BlackwellGeertz, C. (1973/1975) The interpretation of cultures, London: Hutchinson.Geertz, C. (1983) Local Knowledge: further essays in in interpretive anthropology, New York: Basic Books.Getimis, P. (2003) ‘Improving European Union regional policy by learning from the past in view of regional enlargement’, European

Planning Studies, 11, p. 77-87.Geyer, M. (1989) ‘Historical Fictions of Autonomy and the Europeanization of National History’, Central European History, Volume 22, Issues 3-4, pp. 316-342, Cambridge Journals.Giannakourou, G. (1996) ‘Towards a European spatial planning policy: theoretical dilemmas and institutional implications’, European

Planning Studies 4(5): 595-613.Giddens, A. (1984) The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration. Cambridge: Polity Press.Giddens, A. (1987) Social Theory and modern society, Cambridge; Polity.Giddens, A. (1990) Consequences of Modernity, Cambridge: Poliy Press.Gilbert, M. (1989) On Social Facts, London: Routledge.Gilbert, M. (1994) ‘The politics of location: Doing feminist research at “home” ’, Professional Geographer, 46, Blackwell Publishers,

pp. 90-96.Ginneken, J. van (2009) De kracht van de zwerm, Zelfsturing in de organisatie, Amsterdam/Antwerpen: Busines Contact.Gioia, D.A., and Pitre, E. ‘Multiparadigm Perspectives on Theory Building’, The Academy of Management Review, Voulme 15, No. 4,

JSTOR, pp. 584-602.Goertz, G., and Mahoney, J. (2005) ‘Two-Level Theories and Fuzzy-Set Analysis’, Sociological Methods & Research, Volume 33, No. 4,

Sage Publications, pp. 497-538.Gordon, C. (1980) ‘Afterword’, to M. Foucault, Power/Knowledge. Brighton: Harvester, pp. 229-29.Gottdeiner, M. (1995) Postmodern Semiotics: Material Culture and the Forms of Postmodern Life. Oxford: Blackwell.Gottman, J. (1972) ‘The Evolution of the Concept of Territory’, Social Science Information, 14(3/4), pp. 29-47.Gough, J. and Eisenschitz, A. (1996) ‘The construction of mainstream local economic initiatives: mobility, socialization, and class

relations’, Economic Geography, 72 (2), 178-95. Gouldson, A. and Murphy, J. (1996) ‘Ecological modernisation and the European Union’, Geoforum 27(1): 11-21.Graham, P. (2001) ‘Space: irrealis objects in technology policy and their role in a new political economy’, Discourse and Society 12(6):

761-88.Graham, S. and Healey, P. (1999) ‘Relational concepts of space and place: Issues for planning theory and practice’, in European Planning

Studies, 7(5), pp. 623-646.Gramsci, A. (1971) Selections from the Prison Notebooks, London: Lawrence & Wishart.Grassland, C. (2004) Les inegalites regionales dans une Europe elargies, in B. Chavance (ed.), L’Europe centrale face au grand

enlargissement, Paris : L’Harmattan.

262

References

Grasland, C. and Hamez, G. (2004) ‘Vers la construction d’un indicateur de cohesion territorial européen?’, XIème Colloque de l’Association de Science Régionale De Langue Française, Brussels, 1-3 September.

Gravier, J.F. (1947) Paris et le désert français, Flammarion, Paris.Greele, R.J. (1991) Envelops of sound: the art of oral history, 2nd, New York: Prager.Greenwood, J. Grote, J.R. and Ronit, K. (1992) Organised Interests and the European Community, London: Sage.Gregory, R.L. (1970) The intelligent eye, London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson.Guigou, J.-L. (ed) (2000) Aménager la France de 2020: Mettre les territories en mouvement (Nouvelle édition revue et augmentée),

DATAR, La documentation Française, Paris.Guigou, J.-L. (2002) Aménager la France de 2020: Mettre les territories en movement, Datar – La documentation Française, Paris.Haas, E. (1958) The Uniting of Europe, Stanford: Stanford University Press.Haas, P.M. (Ed.) (1992) ‘Knowledge, Power and International Policy Coordination’, International Organization, Monograph Issue

46(1) Winter.Habermas, J. (1985a) Theory of Communicative Action, Volume 1: Reason and the Rationalization of Scoiety, Beacon Press (USA

Edition).Habermas, J. (1985b) Theory of Communicative Action, Voluyme 2: Lifeworld and System: A Critique of Functionalist Reason, Beacon

Press (UAS Edition).Habermas, J. (2001) ‘Why Europe Needs a Constitution’, New Left Review, 11 (September October 2001), pp. 5-26.Hacker, J.S., and Pierson, P. (2002) ‘Business Power and Social Policy: Employers and the Formation of the American Welfare State’,

Politics & Society, 30, 227, SAGE Publications, pp. 277-325.Hacking, I (ed.) (1981) Scientific Revolutions, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Lakatos, I.: ‘History of Science and Its Rational Reconstructions’Hague, C. (2005) Fighting for European unity, Planning, 8 July, p. 15.Hajer, M.A. (1995) The Politics of Environmental Discourse - Ecological Modernization and the Policy Process, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Hajer (1996) ‘Ecological modernisation as cultural politics’, in S. Lash, B. Szerszynski and B. Wyne (eds) Risk, Environment and

Modernity: Towards a new ecology, pp. 246-268, London: Sage.Hajer, M.A. (1999) ‘Zero-friction society: the cultural politics of urban design’, Urban Design Quarterly 71: 29-34.Hajer, M.A. (2000) in A. Faludi and W. Salet (eds.) (2000) The Revival of Strategic Spatial Planning, Amsterdam: Royal Netherlands

Academy of Arts and Sciences.Halkier, H., Danson, M. and Darnborg, C. (eds) (1999) Regional Development Agencies in Europe, London, Jessica Kingsley Publishing.Hall, P. (1996) Cities of Tomorrow, An Intellectual History of Urban Planning and Design in the Twentieth Century, Updated Edition,

Blackwell PublishersOxford/Malden MassachusettsHall, P. (2005) ‘Fundamental question for the ESDP’, Town and Coutnry Planning, November, pp. 330-331.Hall, P.A. 2003 ‘Aligning Ontology and Methodology in Comparative Research, in Comparative Historical Analysis in the Social

Sciences, edited by James Mahoney and Dietrich Rueschemeyer, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Hall, P.A., and Soskice, D. (2001) Varieties of Capitalism: Shaping Places in Fragmented Societies, Basingstoke, Macmillan.Hall, R., and Mairate, A. (2001) ‘Structural Policies’, in Hall, R., Smith, A., Tsoukalis, L. (eds) (2001) Competitiveness and Cohesion in

EU Policies, Oxford, Oxford University Press, pp. 315-357.Halliday, M. (1978) ‘The sociosemantic nature of discourse’, in Language as Social Semiotic, London: Edward Arnold.Halliday, M. (1994) An introduction to Functional Grammar, 2nd edition, London: Edward Arnold.Hamlyn, D.W. (1987) The Penguin History of Western Philosophy,, Penguin Books, Viking.Hardt, M. (1995) ‘The Withering of Civil Society’, Social Text, No. 45 (Winter), p. 27-44.Harris, N. (2001) ‘Spatial development policies and territorial governance in an era of globalisation and localisation’, in Towards a New

Role for Spatial Planning, Paris, Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development, p. 33-58.Harrison, C., Munton, r. and Collins, K. (2004) ‘Experimental discursive space: policy processes, public participation and the Greater

London Authority’, Urban Studies, 41(4), pp. 903-918.Hartle, D. (1976) ‘Techniques and processes of administration’, Canadian Public Administration 19: 21-33.Harvey, D. (1989) The condition of Postmodernity: An inquiry into the origins of cultural change, Oxford: Blackwell.Harvey, D. (1996) Justice, Nature and the Geography of Difference, Oxford: Blackwell.Harvey, D. (2000) Spaces of Hope, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Harvey, D. (2001a) Spaces of Capital, Towards a Critical Geography, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

– Harvey, D. (1985) ‘The geopolitics of capitalism’, first published in Social Relations and Spatial structures’.Harvey, D. (2001b) ‘Globalization and the “Spatial Fix”, geographishe revue, Zeitschrift für Literatur und Diskussion, Jahrgang 2, Heft

2, Marxism in Geography.Hastings, A. (1996) ‘Connecting Linguistic Structures and Social Practices: a Discursive Approach to Social Policy Analysis;, Journal

of Social Policies, 27, 2, pp. 191-211.Hastings, M. (2003) ‘La carte d’identité du service public français’, Les frontiers du service public, Paris: Informations sociales n˚109.

263

References

Hay, D. (1968) Europe: The Emergence of an Idea, 2nd ed., Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Healey, P. (1996) ‘The Communicative turn in planning theory and its implications for spatial strategy formation’, Environment and

Planning B, 23: 217-234.Healey, P. (1997) Collaborative Planning, Shaping Places in Fragmented Societies, Macmillan Press LTD.Healey, P. (2001a) Key Phrase: Territorial Cohesion, The University of Newcastle upon Tyne: November 2001 (www.esprid.org/

keyphrases%5C40.pdf, visited 18-11-2003)Healey, P. (2001b), ‘New approaches to the content and process of spatial development frameworks’, in Towards a New Role for Spatial

Planning, Paris, Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development, p. 143-163.Hedström, P., and Swedberg, R. (1996) ‘Social Mechanisms’, Acta Sociologica, Volume 39, pp. 291-308.Heidegger, M. (1943) Parmenides, translated by Andre Schuwer and Richard Rojcewicz, Indiana University Press, Bloomington and

Indianapolis, 1992.Heidegger, M. (1957) Identiteit en differentie, Tweetalige editie, vertaling en nawoord door Samuel IJsseling, Uitgeverij Boom,

Amsterdam, 2001.Heidegger, M. (2000) Introduction to Metaphysics, Yale University Press.Heidegger, M. (2001) Over het wezen van de grond – Over het wezen van de waarheid, Budel: Damon.Heidegger, M. and Fink, E. (1994) Heraclitus Seminar, translated by C.H. Seibert, Northwestern University Press, Evanston, Illinois.Heiskala, R. (2001) ‘Theorizing power: Weber, Parsons, Foucault and neostructuralism’, Social Science Information, SAGE Publications,

pp. 241-264.Held, D. (1987) Models of Democracy, Oxford: Polity Press.Héritier, A. (1999) Policy-Making and Diversity in Europe, Escape from Deadlock. Cambridge University Press.Héritier, A., Knill, C. and Mingers, S. (1996) Ringing the Changes in Europe: Regulatory Competition and the Transformation of the

State, Britain, France, Germany, Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Herschel, T. & Newman, P. (2002) Governance of Europe’s City Regions, London/New York: Routledge.Hill, M.R. (1993) Archival strategies and techniques, London: Sage.Hines, T. (1987) ‘Left Brain/Right Brain Mythology and Implications for Management and Training’, The Academy of Management

Review, Vol. 12, No. 4, pp. 600-606, published by Academy of Management.Hirst, P. and Thompson, G. (1999) Globalization in Question, 2nd Edition, Oxford: Polity Press.Hix, S. (1998) ‘The study of the European Union II: The ‘new governance’ agenda and its rival, Journal of European Public Policy, 5(1),

pp. 38-65.HM Treasury, Department of Trade and Industry, Office of the Deputy Prime Minister (2003) A modern regional policy for the United

Kingdom, www.dti.gov.uk/europe/consulation.pdf (accessed 3/2004)Hoggart, K., Lees, L, and Davies, A. (2002) Researching Human Geography, London: Arnold.Hooghe, L. (1996) Cohesion Policy and European Integration: Building Multi-Level Governance, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Hooghe, L., Marks, G. (2001) Multi-Level Governance and European Integration, Lanham, Boulder, New York, Oxford, Rowman &

Littlefield Publishers, Inc.Hunt, A. and Wickham, G. (1994) Foucault and Law: Towards a Sociology of Law as Governance, London, Pluto Press.Husar, A. (2006) Towards Territorial Cohesion, The Role of the European Parliament, Master thesis, University of Dortmund, Faculty

of spatial planning.Husson, C. (1999) La cohésion territoriale: genèse d’une revendication, in  : H. Pauliat (ed) La cohésion territoriale et les services

publics en Europe : Interprétation et portée de l’article 7 D du traite d’Amsterdam, ont été publies par les Presses Universitaires du Limoges (PULIM), Entretiens Universitaires Réguliers pour l’Administration en Europe (EUROPA), Limoges

Husson, C. (2000) L’europe des territoires ignores: Le concept de cohésion territoriale, Etude réalisée pour la DATAR dans le cadre d’un contrat avec les Entretiens Régulier pour l’Administration en Europe, Europa.

Husson, C. (2002) L’Europe sans territoire: Essai sur le concept de cohesion territoriale, Paris, Datar/éditions de l’aube.In’t Veld, R. and de Wit, A. (2000) ‘Clarifications’, in R. In’t Veld (Ed.) Willingly and Knowingly: The Roles of Knowledge about Nature

and the Environment in Policy Processes, Utrecht: Lemma Publishers.Informal Council on spatial planning policy – Synthesis by the Presidency, Namur, 14 July 2001 (mrw.wallonie.be/dgatlp/dgatlp/

Pages/DAU/Dwnld/ConseilMinistresEUR/ Conseil%20de%20Namur%20Synthesis_EN_%20.pdf, last visited 16-11-2003)Innes, J.E. (1990) Knowledge and public policy, 2nd edition, New Brunswick, NJ: transaction Books.Innes, J.E. (2004) ‘Consensus Building: Clarifications for the Critics’, Planning Theory, 3(1), SAGE Publications, pp. 5-20.Innes, J.E. and Booher, D.E. (1999) ‘Consensus building as role playing and bricolage: toward a theory of collaborative planning’,

Journal of the American Association of Planning Association, 651999, 9-26.Jachtenfuchs, M. (1997) ‘Democracy and Governance in the European Union’, European Integration online Papers (EIoP), Vol. 1, No.

002, http://eiop.or.at/eiop/text/1997-002a.htm.Jachtenfuchs, M. Diez, T. and Jung, S. (1998) ‘Which Europe? Conflicting Models of a Legitimate European Order’, European Journal

of International Relations 4(4): 409-45.

264

References

Jacobs, K. (2006) ‘Discourse Analysis and its Utility for Urban Policy Research’, Urban Policy and Research, Volume 24, No. 1, pp. 39-52, Routledge.

Janin Rivolin, U. (2003) ‘Shaping European spatial planning, How Italy’s experience can contribute’, in: Town Planning Review, 74 (1), p. 51-76.

Janin Rivolin, U. (2004) European Spatial Planning, Milan, Franco Angeli.Janin Rivolin, U. (2005a) ‘The Future of the ESDP in the Framework of Territorial Cohesion’, disP 161, No. 2 Netzwerk Stadt und

Landschaft, ETH Zürich, Zürich, 2005. p.19-27.Janin Rivolin, U. (2005b) ‘Cohesion and subsidiarity: towards good territorial governance in Europe’, Town Planning Review, 76(1),

pp. 93-107.Janin Rivolin, U. and Faludi, A. (2005) ‘The hidden face of European spatial planning: innovations in governance’, in U. Janin Rivolin

and A.Faludi (eds), ‘Southern perspectives on European spatial Planning’ (Special Issue), European Planning Studies, 13.Janssen-Jansen, L. and Waterhout, B. (eds.) (2006) Grenzeloze ruimte: Regionale gebiedsgerichte ontwikkelingsplanologie in Europees

perspectief, Den Haag: Sdu Uitgevers. – Vogelij, J.: Grenzeloze Ruimte gelezen: debat, conclusie, synthese.

Jaspers, K. (1966) Anaximander, Heraclitus, Parmenides, Plotinus, Lao-Tzu, Nagarjuna, From The Great Philosophers: The Original Thinkers, edited by H. Arendt, translated by R. ManheimAHarvest Book, A Helen and Kurt Wolff Book, Hartcourt Brace Jovanovich, New York and London.

Jay, N. (1981) “Gender and Dichotomy’, Feminist Studies, 7(1), Spring 1981, pp.38-56.Jensen, O.B. (1997) Discourse Analysis and Socio-spatial Transformation Processes: A theoretical framework for analysing spatial

planning, Newcastle upon Tyne: Department of Town and Country Planning, University of Newcastle upon Tyne.Jensen, O.B. and Jørgensen, I. (2000) ‘Danish planning: the long shadow of Europe’, Built Environment 26(1): 31-40.Jensen, O.B., Jørgensen, I. and Nielsen, J. (1996) ‘INTERREG IIC – a loophole for transnational planning’, NordRevy (5/6): 13-19.Jensen, O.B., Jørgensen, I. and Nielsen, J. (1998) ‘What has love got to do with it?’, in C. Bengs and K. Böhme (eds.) The Progress of European Spatial Planning, Stockholm: Nordregio, pp. 11-24.Jensen, O.B. and Richardson, T. (2003) Making European Space, mobility, power and territorial identity. Routledge, London and New

York.Jessop, B. (2000) ‘The Crisis of the National Spatio-temporal Fix and Tendential Ecological Dominance of Globalising Capitalism’,

International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Vol. 24, No. 2, pp. 323-360.Jessop, B. (2002) The Future of the Capitalist State, Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.Joerges, C., Ladeur, K.H. and Vos, E. (1997) Integrating Scientific Expertise into Regulatory Decision-Making, National Traditions and

European Innovations, Baden-Baden: Nomos.Joerges, C., Meny, Y., and Weiler, J.H.H. (eds.) (2001) Mountain or Molehill? A Critical Appraisal of the Commission White Paper on

Governance, Assoc. Eds.: Inge Burgess and Chris Engert, The Jean Monnet Center for International and Regional Economic Law & Justice, The NYU Institutes on the Park, Brussels, 25.7.2001, COM (2001) 428.

– F.W. Scharpf: ‘European Governance: Common Concerns vs. The Challenge of Diversity’,. – N. Walker: ‘The White Paper in Constitutional Context’. – E.O. Eriksen: ‘Governance or Democracy? The White paper on European Governance’. – A. Héritier: ‘The White Paper on European Governance: A Response to Shifting Weights in Interinstitutional Decision-

Making’. – P. Magnette: ‘Euroepan Governance and Civic Participation: Can the European Union be politicised?’. – K.A. Armstrong: ‘Civil Society and the White paper – Bridging or Jumping the Gaps?’. – C. Joerges: ‘”Economic Order” – “Technical Realization” – “The Hour of the Executive”: Some Legal Historical

Observations on the Commission White Paper on European Governance’. – Ph.C. Schmitter: ‘What is there to legitimise in the European Union … and how might this be accomplished?’. – B. Kohler-Koch: ‘The Commission White Paper and the Improvement of European Governance’. – M. Wind: ‘The Commission White Paper, Bridging the Gap between the Governed and the Governing?’. – C. Moellers: ‘Policy, Politics or Political Theory’.

Johnston, R.J., Gregory, D.J., and Smith, D.M. (eds) (1994) Dictionary of human geography, 3rd edition, Oxford: Blackwell.Johnston, R.J., Pratt, G. and Watts, M.J. (eds) (2000) Dictionary of human geography, 4th edition, Oxford: Blackwell.Jordan, A. and Schout, A. (2006) The coordination of European Governance: exploring the capacities for networked governance, Oxford:

Oxford University Press.Jørgensen, I. and Nielsen, J. (1997) ‘Institutional innovations and implications of transnational planning cooperation: the gestation

of the Baltic Sea Region by the European Union. A research agenda under development’, Nijmegen: AESOP International Congress, 28-31 May, 1997.

Kant, I. (1781/1998) Kritik der Reinen Vernuft/Critique of Pure Reason, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

265

References

Kariel, H.S. (1972) ‘Commentary on Lane’s paper’, in James C. Charlesworth (ed.), Integration of the Social Sciences through Policy Analysis, Philadelphia: American Academy of Political and Social Science.

Katz, C. (1994) ‘Playing the field: Questions of fieldwork in geography’, Professional Geographer, 46, Blackwell Publishers, pp. 67-72.Kemeny, J. (1992) Housing and Social Theory, London: Routledge.Kingdon, J.W. (1984) Agendas, Alternatives and Public Policy, New York, Harper Collins.Kingdon, J.W. (1995) Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies, Second Edition, The University of Michigan, LongmanKnieling, J. (2000) Leitbildprozesse und Regionalmanagement (Beitrage für Politikwissenschaft 77), Frankfurt: Peter LangKohler-Koch, B. (2003) Linking EU and National Governance, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

– Heinelt, H., Kopp-Malek, T., Lang, J., and Reissert, B.: ‘Policy-Making in Fragmented Systems: How to explain Success’.Kohler-Koch, B. and Eising, R. (eds.) (1999) The Transformation of Governance in the European Union, London: Routledge.

– Kohler-Koch, B.: ‘The Evolution and Transformation of European Governance’.Korpi, W. (1985) ‘Power Resources Approach vs. Action and Conflict: On Causal and Intentional Explanations in the Study of Power’,

Sociological Theory, 3(2), pp.31-45.Kraemer, A. (2001) Results of the Cardiff Process: Assessing the State of Development and Charting the way ahead, Report to the

Federal German Environmental Agency and the Federal Environment Ministry, Ecologic: Berlin, 2001.Krätke, S. (2001) ‘Strengthening the polycentric urban system in Europe: Conclusions from the ESDP’, European Planning Studies, 9,

p. 105-116.Kuhn, T.S. (1962/1970) The structure of scientific revolutions, 1962, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Kurki (2003) ‘Re-engaging with Aristotle: Evaluating Critical Realist Philosophy of Causation in Aristotelian Light’, paper for the 2003

AESOP/ACSPO PhD Workshop Amsterdam, 5-7 July 2003, University of Wales, AberystwythKurlander, A. (1998), Work (C) 1998 Estate of Pablo Picasso/Artists Rights Society (ARS), New York, http://www.oberlin.edu/amam/

Picasso_Glass.htm, visited on 13 of March 2010.Kunzmann, K.R. (1996) ‘Euro-megalopolis or themepark Europe? Scenarios for European spatial development’, International Planning

Studies 1(2): 143-163.Kunzmann, K. R. (1998) Planning Spatial Equity in Europe, International Planning Studies, Vol. 3, No. 1.Kymlica, W. (1990) Contemporary Political Philosophy, An Introduction, Claredon Press, OxfordLabour Associates (2003) Analysis of the impact of Community Policies on Regional Cohesion, Commissioned by the European

Commission DG Regional Policy, October.Laclau, E. and Mouffe, C. (1985) Hegemony and Socialist Strategy: Towards a radical democratic politics, London: Verso.Laffan, B., O’Donnell, R. and Smith, M. (2000) Europe’s Experimental Union: Rethinking Integration, London, Routledge.Larsen, H. (1997) Foreign Policy as Discourse Analysis: France, Britain and Europe, London: Routledge.Latour, B. (1987) Science in Action, Cambridge: Mass.: Harvard University Press.Latour, B. and Woolgar, S. (1979) Laboratory life: the construction of scientific facts, Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Law, J. (1992) ‘Notes on the Theory of Actor-Network: Ordering, Strategy, and Heterogeneity’, Systems Practice, Vol. 5. Nr. 4, pp. 379-

393.Law, J. and Hassard, J. (1999) Actor Network Theory and after, Blackwell Publishing, Oxford.

– Latour, B., ‘On recalling ANT’Lawton-Smith, H., Tracey, P. and Clark, G.L. (2003) ‘European policy and the regions: a review and analysis of tensions’, European

Planning Studies, 11, p. 859-873.Le Galès, P. (2002) European Cities, Social Conflicts and Governance, Oxford University Press, New York.Le Galès, P. and Lesquesne, Ch. eds. (1998) Regions in Europe. Routledge, London and New York.

– Smouts, M.-C., ‘The region as the new imagined community’Lees, L. (2004) ‘Urban Geography: discourse analysis and urban research’, Progress in Human Geography, 28(1), pp. 101-107.Lefebvre, H. (1976a) De l’État: De Hegel à Marx par Staline, Volume 2, Paris: Union Générale d’Éditions.Lefebvre, H. (1977/1991) The Production of Space, Oxford: Blackwell.Lefebvre, H. (1978) De l’État: Les Contradictions de l’État moderne, Volume 4, Paris: Union Générale d’Éditions.Leipitz, A. (1994) ‘The National and the Regional: Their Autonomy vis-à-vis the Capitalist World Crisis’, in Palan, R. and Gills, B.

(eds.), Transcending the State-Global Divide, Lyanne Rienner, Boulder CO.Leitner, H. (1997) ‘Reconfiguring the spatiality of power: the construction of a supranational migration framework for the European

Union’, Political Geography 16(2), Pergamon, pp. 123-143.Lemke, T. (2000) ‘Foucault, Governmentality, and Critique’ – Paper presented at the Rethinking Marxism Conference, University of

Amherst (MA), September 21-24, 2000.Levi, M. (1998) ‘Conscription: The Price of Citizenship’, in Analytic Narratives, Robert H. Bates, Avner Greif, Margaret Levi, Jean-

Laurent Rosenthal, and Barry R. Weingast (Eds.) Princeton University Press.Levi-Strauss, C. (1966) The savage mind, Oxfor University Press, Oxford.Lévy, J. (1997) L’Europe, une géographie, Hachette, Paris.

266

References

Liepitz, A. (1995) ‘Avoiding megapolization: The battle of Île de France’, European Planning Studies, 3(2) 143-154.Leitner, H. (1997) ‘Reconfiguring the spatiality of power: the construction of a supranational migration framework for the European

Union’, Political Geography, 16(2), Elsevier Science Ltd., pp. 123-143.Lindblom, C.E. (1979) ‘Still Muddling, Not Yet Through’, Public Administration Review, pp. 517-526.Lindblom, C.E. (1992) Inquiry and Change, The Troubled Attempt to Understand and Shape Society, Yale University Press.Linde, I. van der, and Segers, N. (2004) Het einde van Europa, Ontmoetingen langs de nieuwe oostgrens, Lemniscaat, Rotterdam.Logan, J.R. & Molotch, H.L. (1987) Urban Fortunes, The Political Economy of Place, University of California Press, Berkeley, Los

Angeles, London.Lossee, J. (1993) A Historical Introduction to the Philosophy of Science , Third edition, revised and enlarged, OPUS, Oxford University

Press.Lotringer, S. ed. (1989) Foucault Live: Collected interviews 1961-1984, New York: Semiotext(e)

– Foucault, M., ‘Space, knowledge, power’Low, M. (1997) ‘Representation unbound: globalization and democracy’, in Cox, K. (Ed.), Spaces of globalization, New York: Guilford

Press, 240-280.Lubove, E. (1959) ‘The twentieth century city: the progressive as municipal reformer’ Mid-America 41(1959), 202.Luhmann, N. (1990) Die Wissenschaft der Gesellschaft, Frankfurt/M: Suhrkamp.Lukes, S. (1974) Power: A Radical View, London and Basingstoke: The MacMillan Press LTD.Luxembourg Presidency (2005a) Territorial State and Perspectives of the Union, towards a stronger European territorial cohesion in

the light of the Lisbon and Gothenborg ambitions, endorsed for further development by the Ministers for Spatial Development and the European Commission, 20/21 May 2005 in Luxembourg.

Luxembourg Presidency (2005b) Scoping Document and Summary of Political Messages for an Assessment of the Territorial State and Perspectives of the European Union: Towards a stronger European territorial cohesion in the light of the Lisbon and Gothenborg ambitions.

Luxembourg Presidency (2005c) Presidency Conclusions, Informal Ministerial Meeting on Regional Policy and Territorial Cohesion, 20-21 May.

Lyon, M. (1997) ‘An electronic panopticon? A sociological critique of surveillance theory’, Sociological Review 41 (4): 653-678.Määttä, S. (2006) Looking for a deliverable Lisbon strategy on sustainable growth and jobs, Helsinki: Ministry of Finance.MacKinnon, D. (2000) ‘Managerialism, governmentality and the state: a neo-Foucauldian approach to local economic governance’,

Political Geography, Nr. 19, pp. 293-314.MacLeod, G. (2001) ‘New Regionalism Reconsidered: Globalization and the Remaking of Political Economic Space’, in International

Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Volume 25.4, December 2001, published by Blackwell Publishers.Magnette, P. (2000) L’Europe, l’Etat et la démocratie, Bruxelles: Complexe.Mahoney, J., and Rueschemeyer, D. (ed.) (2003) Comparative Historical Analysis in the Social Sciences, Cambridge: Cambridge

University Press. – Hall, P.A.: ‘Aligning Ontology and Methodology in Comparative Research’

Mamadouh, V. (2001) ‘The territoriality of European integration and the territorial features of the European Union: the first 50 years’, Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, 92(4), the Royal Dutch Geographical Society, Blackwell Publishers, pp. 420-436.

Manning, N. (ed.) (1985) Social Problems and Welfare Ideology, London: Gower.Marks, G. (1993) ‘Structural policy and multilevel governance in the EC’, in A. Cafruny and G. Rosenthal (Eds.) The State of the European Community, Volume 2, Harlow: Longman.Marks, J. (1995) ‘A new image of thought’, New Formations: 66-76.Marks, G., Hooghe, L. and Blank, K. (1996) ‘European Integration from the 1980s: State-Centric v. Multi-level Governance’, Journal of Common Market Studies, Vol. 34, No. 3, pp. 342-378.Marr, D. (1982) Vision, San Fransisco, W.H. Freeman.Martin, A. and Ross, G. (2004) ‘Introduction: EMU and the European social model’, in A, Martin and G. Ross (eds.) Euros and

Europeans: Monetary integration and the European model of society, Cambridge, Cambridge Unviersity Press, pp. 1-19.Martin, P.H. (2000) A quoi servent les politiques régionales Européennes? (Economie Internationale, la Revue du CEPII, No. 81), Paris,

La Documentation Française.Massé, P. (1964) L’aménagement du territoire: projection géographique de la société de l’avenir. Revue d’économie politique. Published

in: 1965. Le Plan ou l’anti-hasard. Paris: Nrf, Coll. Idées, Ch. 4, p. 105-143; new publication: 1990. Paris, Hermann. (with a foreword from J.Delors)

Masser, I., Svidén, O. and Wegener, M. (1992) The Geography of Europe’s Futures, London: Belhaven Press.Massey, D. (1992) ‘Politics and Space/Time’, New Left Review, I/196, http://www.newleftreview.org/?view=1693, visited 20-5-2009.Mehlbye, P. (2000) ‘Global integration zones: neighbouring metropolitan regions in metropolitan clusters’, Informationen zur

Raumentwicklung, 11/12, p. 755-762.

267

References

Meijers, E. and Romein, A. (2003) ‘Realizing potential: Building regional organizing capacity in polycentric urban regions’, European Urban and Regional Studies, 10(2), 173-186.

Mercier, G. (2002) ‘Développement régional en Slovaquie et intégration européenne’, unpublished PhD thesis, Town and Planning Institute, Grenoble, France.

Merleau-Ponty, M. (1964) Signs, Evanston, Ill.: Northwestern University Press.Mermaid Group discussion document of 2002 called: ‘ESDP: Managing the territorial dimension of the EU policies after enlargement

- Outline for a common documentMetcalfe, L. (2000) ‘Reforming the Commission: Will Organizational Efficiency Produce Effective Governance?’, Journal of Common

Market Studies, 38/5, p. 817-841.Miller, J. (1991) The Passion of Michel Foucault, New York: Simon and Schuster.

– Foucault, M. (1971) ‘Le Discours de Toul’, Le Nouvel Observateur 372 (December 27, 1971 – January 2, 1972).Miller, P. and Rose, N. (1990) ‘Governing economic life’, Economy and Society 19, pp. 1-21.Miller, P. and Rose, N. (1993) Governing economic life, in: M. Gane and T. Johnson (Eds) Foucault’s New Domains, pp. 75–105.

London: Routledge.Milliken, J. (1999) ‘The Study of Discourse in International Relations: A Critique of Research and Methods’, European Journal of

International Relations, 5(2): 225-254.Ministero Dell’Economia E Delle Finanze (2002) Quinto Rapporto del Dipartimento per le Politische di Sviluppo 2001-02, allegato alla

Relazione previsonale e programmatica per il 2003, Rome, Instituto Poligrafico e Zecca dello Stato.Ministers for Spatial Development and the European Commission (2005) Territorial State and Perspectives of the European Union

– towards stronger European territorial cohesion in the light of the Lisbon and Gothenburg ambitions, endorsed for further development by the Ministers for Spatial Development and the European Commission at the Informal Meeting on Regional Policy and Territorial Cohesion, 20/21 May 2005, Luxembourg.

Ministry of Housing, Physical Planning and the Environment (1991) Urban Networks in Europe: Contribution of the Third Meeting of the Ministers of the EC Member States Responsible for Physical Planning and Regional Policy, The Hague: National Physical Planning Agency.

Moll, M. (2002) Diploma Thesis, InterregIIc North Sea Programme – successful transnational planning?, University of Dortmund, (www.folkworld.de/eg/interreg/links.htm, visited 27-9-2003)

Molle, W. (2002) ‘Globalisation, regionalism and labour markets: should we recast the foundations of the EU regime in matters of regional development?’, Regional Studies, 36, pp. 161-172.

Moore, B, Jr. (1966) Social Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy: Lord and Peasant in the Making of the Modern World, Boston: Beacon Press.

Morely, D. and Robins, K. (1995) Spaces of Identity: Global media, electronic landscapes and cultural boundaries, London: Routledge?Morgan, K. and Nauwelaers, C. (1999) Regional Innovation Strategies: The Challenge for the Less-Favoured Regions, London, The

Stationery Office.Morgan, G. and Smircich, L. (1980) ‘The case for qualitative research’, Academy of Management Review, 5, pp. 491-500.Muller, P. and Surel, Y. (1998) L’analyse des politiques publiques, Montchrestien, Paris.Murdoch, J. (2000) ‘Space against time: competing rationalities in planning for housing’, in Trans Inst Br Geogr, NS 25, pp. 503-519,

Royal Geographical Society (with The Institute of British Geographers) 2000.Murdoch, J. (2004) ‘Putting discourse in its place: planning, sustainability and the urban capacity study’, in Area (2004), 36.1, pp.

50-58.Murdoch, J. and Ward, N. (1997) ‘Governmentality and territoriality, The statistical manufacture of Britain’s ‘national farm’, in Political

Geography, Vol. 16, No. 4, pp. 307-324, 1997, Elsevier Science Ltd.Murswieck, A. (1994) (Ed) Regieren und Politikberatung, Opladen: Leske + BudrichMusso, P. (1999) Saint Simon et la saint-simonisme, Paris: PUF.Nadin, V. (2002a) ‘Visions and visioning in European Spatial Planning’, in: A. Faludi (ed.) European Spatial Planning, Cambridge

(MA): Lincoln Institute of Land Policy, 121-37.Nadin, V. (2002b) ‘Transnational spatial development and planning: Experience from the Spatial Vision for North-West Europe’ in C.

Bengs (ed.), Facing ESPON: Nordregio Report 2002(I), p. 25-40.Nadin, V. and Shaw, D. (1999) Subsidiarity and Proportionality in Spatial Planning Activities in the European Union – Final Report,

London: Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions.Nash, (1995) see Jensen&Richardson (2003)!!!!!Nellhaus, T. (1998) ‘Signs, Social Ontology, and Critical Realism’, Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, Volume 28, No. 1, pp. 1-24.Nelson, L. (1990) Who knows. From Quine to a feminist empiricism, Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Neocleous, M. (2003) ‘Off the Map, On Violence and Cartography’, European Journal of Social Theory, 6(4), Sage Publications, pp.

409-425.Newman, I. (1996) ‘Discourse and the public sector’, Local Government Policy Making, 23, pp. 52-59.

268

References

Newman, P. and Thornley, A. (1996) Urban Planning In Europe, International Competition, National Systems & Planning Projects. Routledge, London and New York.

Niebuhr, A. & Stiller, S. (2003) “Territorial Disparities in Europe”. In: Intereconomics, Vol. 38, No. 3, May/June 2003, pp. 156-164.Nietzsche, F. (1968) The Will to Power, New York: Vintage Books.Nietzsche, F. (1969) The Anti-Christ, Harmondsworth: PenguinNietzsche, F. (1998) Philosophy in the Tragic Age of the Greeks, translated, with an introduction by M. Cowan, A Gateway Edition,

Regnery Publishing, Inc.Nixon, J., Walker, M., and Baron, S. (2002) ‘From Washington heights to the Raploch: Evidence, mediation and the Genealogy of

Policy, Social Policy and Society, Vol. 1(3): 237–246.Nolen, J. (1911) ‘Standardized street widths’, in Proceedings of the Fifth National Conference on City Planning, Boston, p. 199.Nonet, Ph and Selznick, Ph. (1978) Law and Society in Transition, New York, Harper and Row.Nordregio (2000) Study Programme on European Spatial Planning, Final Report, 31 March 2000 (for instance: www.nordregio.se/

spespn/Files/ chapter%201%20-%20april.pdf, visited 27-11-2003).Nordregio (2003) ESPON Project 2.2.1, Territorial Effects of Structural Funds, First Interim Report March 2003.Nordregio (2006a) ESPON Project 2.3.1, Application and Effects of the ESDP in the Member States, Second Interim Report.Nordregio (2006b) ESPON Project 2.3.1, Application and Effects of the ESDP in the Member States, Final Report.NSPA – National Spatial Planning Agency (2001) Making Space, Sharing Space (Summary): Fifth National Policy Document on Spatial Planning 2000/2020, The Hague, Ministry of Housing, Spatial Planning and the Environment.Nugent, N. (1999) The Government and Politics of the European Union, 4th edition, Houndmills/Basingstoke/London: Macmillan

Press Ltd.O’Connor, J.S. and Olsen, G.M. (eds.) (1998) Power Resource Theory and the Welfare State, A critical approach, University of Toronto

Press. – Olsen, G.M. and O’Connor, J.S.: ‘Introduction, Understanding the Welfare State: Power Resources Theory and Its Critics’.

OECD – Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (2001a) Territorial Outlook 2001, Paris, OECD Publications.OECD – Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (2001b) Local Partnerships for Better Governance: Territorial

Economy, Paris: OECD.OECD – Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (2003) Policy Fact sheet: High-Level Meeting on Innovation and

Effectiveness in Territorial Development Policy (GOV/TDPC(2003)14/REV I), 19 June, Paris, OECD.OECD – Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (2005) Building Competitive Regions, Strategies and Governance,

Paris, OECD Publishing.O’Dell, T. (2000) ‘Traversing the transnational’, in P.O. Berg, A. Linde-Laursen and O. Löfgren (eds) Invoking a Transnational

Metropolis: The making of the Øresund Region, pp. 231-253, Lund: Studentlitteratur.O’Donnell, R. (1992) ‘Policy requirements for regional balance in economic and monetary union’, in Hannequart, Archille (ed.):

Economic and Scoial Cohesion in Europe, London: Routledge, pp. 21-52.ODPM – Office of the Deputy Prime Minister (2005a) European Evidence Review: Ministerial Informal Meeting on Sustainable

Communities, Source Document, Bristol, 6-7 December 2005, London.ODPM – Office of the Deputy Prime Minister (2005b) Conclusions of Bristol Informal Meeting on Sustainable Communities in

Europe, UK Presidency, Bristol, 6-7 December 2005, London.OJEC – Official Journal of the European Communities (1997) Consolidated Version of the Treaty establishing the European Community,

No. C 340.OJEC – Official Journal of the European Communities (2000) Charter of Fundamental Human Rights of the European Union, No.

c364/01.OJEC – Official Journal of the European Communities (2002) Consolidated Version of the Treaty establishing the European Community,

No. C 325.OJEC – Official Journal of the European Communities (2004) Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe, No. C 310.OJEC – Official Journal of the European Communities (2006a) Council Decision of 20 February 2006 on Community strategic

guidelines for rural development (programming period 2007 to 2013), 20606/144/EC.OJEC – Official Journal of the European Communities (2006b) Council Decision of 21 February 2006 on the Community strategic

guidelines for Cohesion Policy (programming period 2007 to 2013), 210606/291/ECOlsen, J.P. (2002) ‘The Many Faces of Europeanization’, JMCS 40(5), Blackwell Publishers Ltd, pp. 921-952.O’Neill, J. (2001) ‘Representing people, representing nature, representing the world’, Environment and Planning C: Government and

Policy, Volume 19, pp. 483-500.Owens, S. and Cowell, R. (2002) Land and Limits: Interpreting sustainability in the planning process, London: Routledge.Owens, S., Rayner, T. and Bina, O. (2004) ‘New agendas for appraisal: reflection on theory, practice and research’, Environment and

Planning A, 36(11), pp. 1943-1959.

269

References

Padoa-Schioappa, T. (1987) Efficiency, Stability and Equity: A Strategy for the Evolution of the Economic System of the European Community, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Pavlich, G. (1995) ‘Contemplating a postmodern sociology: genealogy, limits and critique’, Sociological Review 43: 548-572.Pedler, R.H. and Schaefer, G.F. (Eds.) (1996) Shaping European Law and Policy, The Role of Committees and Comitology in the Political

Process, Maastricht: European Institute of Public Administration.Perry, D. C. (1995) Making space: planning as a mode of thought, in: H. Liggett and D. C. Perry (Eds) Spatial Practices: Critical

Explorations in Social/Spatial Theory, pp. 209–241. London: Sage.Pedersen, O.K. (ed.) (1994) Demokratiets lette tilstand – syv beslutningstagere om Danmark og fremtid (The lightness of democracy),

Copenhagen: Spektrum.Pekerman, M. (2003) ‘Cross-border regions in Europe: significance and drivers of regional cross-border cooperation’, European Urban

and Regional Studies, 10, p. 173-186.Pellizzoni, L. (2001) ‘The myth of the best argument: power, deliberation and reason’, British Journal of Sociology, 52(1), Routledge

Journals, pp. 59-86.Peters, D. (2003) ‘Cohesion, polycentricity, missing links and bottlenecks: conflicting spatial storylines for pan-European transport

investments’, European Planning Studies, 11, p. 317-339.Peters, G. (1996) ‘Agenda-setting in the European Union’, in Richardson, J. (ed.): European Union, Power and Policy Making,

Routledge, London, pp. 61-76.Petit, P. (1999) ‘Structural reforms and growth regimes of the post-Fordist era’, Review of Social Economy, 57 (2), 220-43.Pettigrew, A.M. (1990) ‘Longitudinal Field Research on Change: Theory and Practice’, Organization Science, Vol. 1, No. 3, Special Issue:

Longitudinal Field Research Methods for Studying Processes of Organizational Change, pp. 267-292.Peyrony, J. (2002) ‘Le schema de développement de l’espace communautaire, Territoires en mouvement, Paris: La Documentation

Francais, DATAR.Peyrony, J. (2004) ‘DATAR’ en de ruimtelijke toekomstverkenning: Welke toekomst voor het Europees grondgebied?’, Stedebouw &

Ruimtelijke Ordening, No.5 (Supplement), p. 34-38.Peyrony, J. (2005) ‘De nouveaux territoires européens: les petites europe’, in N. Commerçon and A. Blenton-Ruget (eds), Territoires

institutionels, territoires functionels, Lyon, Presses universitaires de Lyon (forthcoming).Pezzini, M. (2000), Territorial policies and economic services in OECD countries, first draft, OECD, Territorial Reviews Division,

Paris.Pezzini, M. (2003) Summary of the Main Points to be Developed. Presentation at the meeting of the EU Sub-Committee on Spatial

and Urban Development, Brussels 18 February 2003.Philo, C. (1987) The Same and Other: On geographies, madness and outsiders, Loughborough: Loughborough University, Department

of Geography.Pierret, G. (1997) Région d’Europe: La face cache de l’Union – Une avondure récue, Rennes, Editions Apogée.Plotkin, S. (1987) Keep Out: The Struggle for Land Use Control, Berkeley, CA, University of California Press.Polsby, N.W. (1963) Community Power and Political Theory, New Haven and London: Yale University Press.Polverari, L. and Bachtler, J. (2004) ‘La dimensión territorial de la cohesión económica y social: política regional y planificación

territorial en Europa’, in Joan Romero González and Farinós Dasí Joaquín (Eds.), Ordenación del territorio y desarrollo territorial, El gobierno del territorio en Europa: tradiciones, contextos, culturas y nuevas visions, Ediciones Trea, S.L. Gijón, Spain.

Polverari, L. and McMaster, I. (2005) ‘Territorial Cohesion and new Cohesion Policy: Challenges for old and new Member States’, a presentation during the ESPON Scientific Conference on European Territorial Research, Luxembourg, 13-14 October 2005.

Polverari, L. Quiogue, N.C., Gross, F., and Novotný, V. (2005) Territorial Cohesion and Structural Funds Programmes: Urban Development & Territorial Cooperation, IQ-Net Review Paper 16(1), European Policies Research Centre, Glasgow (may).

Polverari, L., Rooney, M., McMaster, I., Raines, P., Bachtler, J. Böhme, K. and Mariussen, A. (2001) ‘The spatial and urban dimensions in 2000-06 objective 1 programmes: overview on the objective 1’, unpublished report to DG Regio, European Commission.

Popkin, R.H. (ed) (1998) The Pimlico History of Western Philosophy, Pimlico, Columbia University Press. – Carr, D.: ‘Husserl and Phenomenology’.

Popper, K. (1959/1992) The Logic of Scientific Discoevery, New York: Basic Books, reprint: Routledge.Porter, M.E. (1990) The Competitive Advantage of Nations, New York, Free Press.Portuguese Presidency (1992) ‘The spatial development of Community territory – the case of trans-European networks’, Meeting of

ministers of the EC member states responsible for regional and physical planning, Lisbon, 15-16 May.Poster, M. (1984) Foucault, Marxism and History, Cambridge: Polity Press.Potter, J. and Wetherall, M. (1987) Discourse and Social Psychology: Beyond Attitudes and Behaviour, London: Sage.Powell, W.W. and Robbins, R. (eds) (1984) Conflict and Consensus, New York: The Free Press.

– Merton, R.K. ‘Socially Expected Durations: A Case Study of Concept Formation in Sociology’Prodi, R. (2002) Services of General Interest: a role for Europe, Speech by Romano Prodi, President of the European Commission,

University Paris IX Dauphine, Paris, 18 October 2002.

270

References

Prodi, R. (2003) Services of general economic interest and the European model of development, CEEP dinner, Brussels, 5 February 2003.

Putnam, R. (1977) ‘Elite transformation in advanced industrial societies: an empirical assessment of the theory of technocracy’, Comparative Political Studies, Vol. 10, Nr. 3, pp. 383-412.

Raco, M. and Imrie, R. (2000) ‘Governmentality and rights and responsibilities in urban policy’, Environment and Planning A 32, pp. 2187-2204.

Radaelli, C.M. (1997) The Politics of Corporate Taxation in the European Union : Knowledge and International Policy Agendas, London: Routledge.

Radaelli, C.M. (1999) ‘The public policy of the European Union: whither politics of expertise?’, Journal of European Public Policy 6(5), Taylor & Francis Ltd, pp. 757-74

Radaelli, C.M. (2000) ‘Whither Europeanization? Concept Stretching and substantive change’, European Integration online Papers (EIoP) Vol. 4, N.8, http://eiop.or.at/eiop/texte/2000-008.htm

Ragin, C.C. (1994) Constructing Social Research: the unity and diversity of method, Pine Forge Press.Ravensteyn, N., van, and Evers, D. (2004) ‘What happened to European spatial planning?’, Ruimte in Debat, No. 4, p. 4-10.Rawls, J. (1999) A Theory of Justice, revised edition, The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.RED – Rurality-Environment-Development (2004) In response to the Commission’s Proposal COM(2004)490final “Proposal for a

Council regulation on support for rural development by the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development”, Doc RED-Com(2004)/3/

Rein, M. and Schön, D. (1986) Frame-reflective policy discourse, Beleidsanalyse, 15(4): 4-18.Rein, M. and Schön, D. (1994) Frame reflection: Toward the resolution of intractable policy controversies, New York: Basic Books.Rémond, R. (1982) Les droits en France, Paris: Aubier-Montaigne.Richardson, J. (ed.) (1996) European Union: Power and policy making, London: Routledge.Richardson, T. (1995) ‘Trans-European Networks: good news or bad for peripheral regions?’, Proceedings of seminar A, pan-European

transport issues, pp. 99-110, Warwick: 23rd European Transport Forum.Richardson, T, & Jensen, O.B. (2000) ‘Discourses of Mobility and Polycentric Development: A contested View of European Spatial

Planning’, European Planning Studies, Vol. 8. No. 4, 2000.Richardson, T. and Jensen, O.B. (2003) ‘Linking Discourse and Space: Towards a Cultural Sociology of Space in Analysing Spatial

Policy Discourses’, Urban Studies, Vol. 40, No. 1, 7-22, 2003, Carfax Publishing.Riessman, C.K. (1993) Narrative Analysis, Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Ritter, E.-H. (ed.) (2003) Spatial Development Policy in the European Constitutional Treaty: Position Paper from the ARL, Hanover, Studies in Spatial Development No. 3), Hanover, Akademie für Raumforschung und Landesplanung.Robert, J. (2004) Politiques communautaires et territories, Enjeux relatifs aux impacts régionaux des politiques communautaires non territorialisées, Territoires 2020, Reveu d’etudes et de prospective, No. 11, Paris, La Documentation

Francais, DATAR, pp. 7-13.Robert, J. (2005) ‘The origins of territorial cohesion and vagaries of its trajectory’, paper given at the seminar sponsored by the Lincoln

Institute of Land Policy on ‘Territorial Cohesion and the European Model of Society’, Austrian Institute of Regional Research and Spatial Planning, Vienna, 12-13 July.

Robert, J., T. Stumm, J.M. de Vet, G.J. Reincke, M. Hollanders, M.A. Figueiredo (2001) Spatial Impacts of Community Policies and the costs of non-coordination, Brussels: European Commission.

Rochefort, D. and Cobb, R. (1993) ‘Problem definition, agenda access, and policy choice’, Policy Studies Journal, 21:1, pp. 56-71.Rodriguez-Pose, A. and Fratesi, U. (2004), ‘Between development and social policies: the impact of European structural funds in

Objective I regions’, Regional Studies, 38, p. 97-113.Roe, E. (1994) Narrative Policy Analysis, Theory and Practice, Durham and London: Duke University Press.Rometsch, D. and Wessels, K. (1996) The European Union and its Member States: Towards institutional fusion?, Manchester: Manchster

University Press.Rose, N. (1993) ‘Government, authority and expertise in advanced liberalism’, Economy and Society 22, pp. 327-399.Rose, N. and Miller, P. (1992) ‘Political Power Beyond the State: Politics in the European Union’, British Journal of Sociology 43(2):

173-205.RPB – Ruimtelijke Planbureau (2004) ‘Towards a new European Spatial Development Perspective?’, Ruimte in Debat, No. 4, Netherlands

Institute for Spatial Research, The Hague.Rudzio, K. (2000) Funktionswandel der Kohäsionspolitik unter dem Einfluß des Europäischen Parlaments, Vol. 30 Baden-Baden,

Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft.Ruggie, J.G. (1993) ‘Territoriality and beyond: problematizing modernity in international relations’, International Organisation 47(1):

139-174.Rumford, C. (2000) ‘European Cohesion? Globalization, Autonomatization, and the Dynamics of EU Integation’, The European Journal

of Social Science, 13(2), pp.183-196.

271

References

Rumford, C. (2002) The European Union: A political sociology, Oxford: Blackwells.Ryden, Y. (1998) ‘The enabling local state and urban development: resources, rhetoric and planning in East London’, Urban Studies,

35(2), 175-191.Saarikoski, H. (2002) ‘Naturalized Epistemology and Dilemmas of Planning Practice’, Journal of Planning Education and Research, 22,

pp. 3-14.Sabatier, P. (1998) ‘An Advocacy Coalition Framework of Policy Change and the Role of Policy Oriented Learning Therein’, Policy

Sciences, Vol. 21, Boston, Dordrecht, London: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 128-168.Sack, R.D. (1986) Human Territoriality: Its Theory and History, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Said, E.W. (1978/2003) Orientalism, Penguin Books, first edition: 1978.Salet, W.G.M. (1982) ‘Planning Theory, The Quest For Identity’, Socio-Econ. Plan. Sci., Volume 16, No. 4, pp. 172-192, pergamon Press

Ltd.Salet, W.G.M. (2005) The myth of immediacy and the unbearable lightness of governance discourse, Paper presented at the AESOP

conference in Vienna, 13-17 July 2005.Salet, W., Thornley, A. and Kreukels, A. eds. (2003) Metropolitan Governance and Spatial Planning, Comparative Case Studies of

European City-Regions. Spon Press London and New York.Sapir, A., Aghion, Ph., Bertola, G., Hellwig, M., Pisani-Ferry, J., Rosati, D., Vinals, J., Wallace, H., Buti, M. Nava, M., Smith, P.M. (2004)

An Agenda for a Growing Europe: The Sapir Report, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Sartori, G. (1970) ‘Concept misformation in comparative politics’, American Political Science Review, 64(4), December” 1033-1053.Sartori, G. (1991) ‘Comparing and miscomparing’, Journal of Theoretical Politics, 3(3)” 243-257.Sassen, S. (2000) Cities in a Worl Economy, Second edition, Columbia University, Pine Forge Press, Thousand Oaks London New YorkSayer, A. (2000) Realism and Social Science. London: Sage.Scharpf, F.W. (1999) Governing in Europe, effective and democratic?, Oxford University Press.Scharpf, F.W. (2000) Notes Toward a Theory of Multilevel Governing in Europe, MPlfG Discussion Paper 00/5, Max-Planck-Institute

für Gesellschaftforschung, Köln.Scharpf, F. W. (2001) European Governance: Common Concerns vs. The Challenge of Diversity, MPIfG Working Paper 01/6, September

2001.Scharpf, F.W. (2002) ‘The European social model: Coping with the challenges of diversity’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 40(4),

pp. 645-670.Schattscheeider, E.E. (1960) The Semi-Sovereign People: A Realist’s View of Democracy in America, New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Schätzel, L. (ed.) (1993) Wirtschaftsgeografie der Europäischen Gemeischaft, Paderborn, München, Wien, Zürich, Schöningh.Schindegger, F. (2001) ‘Prospects for further work on TIA. Paper presented at conference on TIA’, Louvain-la-Neuve: Austrian Institute

for Regional Studies and Spatial Planning.Schindegger, F. and Tatzberger, G. (2003) The concept of polycentric development, (ÖIR).Schmeitz, P (2006) Directorate of International Affairs, VROM, Presentation at INTERACT seminar, Milan, 27.2.2006.Schmitter, P.C. (1996) ‘If the Nation-State were to Whither Away in Europe, What Might Replace it?’, in S. Gustavsson and L. Lewin

(Eds.), The Future of the Nation State, London: ROutledge, pp. 211-243.Schmitter, P.C. (2000) How to Democratize the European Union…And Why Bother?, Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc..Schön, K.P. (1997) ‘What became of the Leipzig Principles?’, Built Environment 23(4), p. 288-297.Schön, P. (2005) Territorial Cohesion in Europe?, Planning Theory & Practice, Vol. 6, No. 3, London, Routledge, pp. 389-399.Schout, S. and Jordan, A. (2005) ‘Coordinated European governance: self organizing or centrally steered?’, Public Administration 83(1),

p. 201-20.Schout, S. and Metcalfe, L. (1999) ‘Integratie van het milieubeleid in Europese Vakraden – Internministeriële afstemming van ‘event’

naar ‘issue’ coördinatie?’, Project for the Dutch Environment Ministry (VROM), Maastricht/Den Haag.Schout, S., Waterhout, B., and Jordan, A. (2006) ‘Territorial Policy Integration: A multilevel management perspective’, a Draft Working

Paper presented at the Stakeholders Conference Territorial Cohesion and the Lisbon Strategy: exploiting Europe’s territorial potentials, 28 June 2006, Amsterdam, Instituut Clingendael, Clingendael European Studies Programme.

Schultze, Ch, L. (1977) The Public use of Private Interest, Washington D.C., The Brookings Institution.Schultz, C. (1999) ‘City-networking and bottom-up development by transborder cooperation: the influence of local authorities in the

Saar-Lor-Lux-Region’, in H. Knippenberg and J. Markusse (eds) Nationalising and Denationalising European Border Regions 1800-2000, pp. 223-240, Dordrecht: Kluwer.

Scott, J. (1995) Development Dilemmas in the European Community, Buckingham: Open University Press.Sennett, R. (1990) The Conscience of the Eye: The Design and Social Life of Cities. London: Faber and Faber.Shapiro, M. (ed) (1984) The Language of Politics, Oxford: Blackwell.

– Foucault, M.: ‘The order of discourse’.Sharp, E. and Richardson, T. (2001) Reflections on Foucauldian discourse analysis in planning and environmental policy research,

Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning, 3(3), pp. 193–209.

272

References

Shaw, D. and Sykes, O. (2004) ‘The concept of polycentricity in European spatial planning: reflections on its interpretation and application in the practice of spatial planning’, International Planning Studies 9(4), p. 283-306.

Shields, R. (1991) Geographies of Exclusion: Alternative geographies of modernity, London: Routledge.Shipley, R. and Newkirk, R. (1999) ‘Visioning: Did Anybody See Where It Came From?’, Journal of Planning Literature, 12(4), p. 407-

416.Shore, C. (2000) Building Europe: The cultural politics of European integration, London: Routledge.Sibbley, D. (1995) Geographies of Exclusion: Society and difference in the West, London: Routledge.Silverman, D. (2006) Interpreting Qualitative Data, Third Edition, London: SAGE Publications Ltd.Skocpol, T. and Somers, M. (1980) ‘The Uses of Comparative History in Macrosocial Inquiry’, Comparative Studies in Society and

History, Vol. 22, No. 2 (Apr., 1980), pp. 174-197.Smith, A. (2004) ‘Regions, Spaces of Economic Practice and Diverse Economies in the ‘New Europe’, European Urban and Regional

Studies 11(1), SAGE Publications, p. 9-25).Smith, D.W. (2007) ‘Deleuze and the question of desire: toward an immanent ethics’, Parrhesia, Number 2, p. 66-78.Smith, J. (2005) ‘CEMR welcomes European Parliament’s adoption of the Structural Funds package’ http://www.ccre.org/

communiques_de_presse_detail_en.htm?ID=104, visited 18-1-2006.Smith, N. (1993) ‘Homeless/global: scaling places’, in: J. Bird, B. Curtis, T. Putnam et al. (Eds) Mapping the Futures: Local Cultures,

Global Change, pp. 87–119. London: Routledge.Sorensen, A.D. (1982) ‘Planning Comes of Age: A Liberal perspective’, The Planner, November, pp. 184-187.Spaak, H., Comité intergouvernemental créé par la conf´erence de Messin (1956). Rapport des Chefs de D´elégation aux Ministres des

Affaires E´trangères, Bruxelles.Spence, D. (2000) ‘Plus ca Change, Plus Cést la Meme Chose: Attempting to Reform the European Commission’, Journal of European

Public Policy, 7/1, p. 1-25.Speir, H. (1941) ‘Magic Geography’, Social Research, 8, pp. 310-330.Spiekerman, K. and Wegener, M. (1996) Trans-European Networks and Unequal Accissibility in Europe, Eurreg, nr. 4.SSTI – Secretary of State for Trade and Industry (2003) EU Structural and Cohesion Funds: Ministerial Statement, 11 December.Steinmetz, G. (2005) The Politics of Method in the Human Sciences, Positivism and Its Epistemological Others, Durham: Duke University

Press.Stenson, K. and Watt, P. (1999) ‘Governmentality and ‘the Death of the Social’?: A Discourse Analysis of Local Government Texts in

South-east England’, in Urban Studies, Vol. 36, No.1, pp. 189-201, The Editors of Urban Studies, 1999.Stokhof, M.J.B. (2000) Taal en betekenis, Een inleiding in de taalfilosofie, Boom, Amsterdam.Stone Sweet, A. and Sandholtz, W. (1998) ‘Integration, Supranational Governance and the Institutionalization of the European Polity’,

in Sandholtz, W. and Stone Sweet, A. (eds.) European Integration and Supranational Governance, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Stone Sweet, A., Sandholtz, W. and Fligstein, N. eds. (2001) The Institutionalization of Europe. Oxford University Press, New York. – Carporaso, J.A. and Stone Sweet A.: ‘Conclusion: Institutional Logics of European Integration’.

Storey, D. (2001) Territory: The Claiming of Space, Harlow: Prentice Hall.Stumm, T. and Noetzel, R. (1998) Die Europäische Raumentwicklungspolitik, Reihe Regional politik, REGI 100 DE, Strasbourg:

European Parliament.SUD – Subcommittee on Spatial and Urban Development (2002) Annual Activity Report from the Sub-Committee of Spatial and Urban

Development to the Committee on the Development and Conversion of Regions, Brussels, DG Regio. SUD – Subcommittee on Spatial and Urban Development: Expert Working Group (2003a) Managing the Territorial Dimension of EU

Policies after Enlargement, Expert Document, Brussels, DG Regio.SUD – Subcommittee on Spatial and Urban Development (2003b) ‘Annual Activity report from the SubCommittee of Spatial and

Urban Development to the Committee on the Development and Conversion of the Regions.Szirony, G.M., Burgin, J.S., and Pearson, L.C. (2008) ‘Hemispheric laterality in music and math’, Learn Inq, Vol. 2, pp. 169-180,

Springer Science+Business Media.Tampere Ministerial (1999) Informal Meeting of EU Ministers responsible for Spatial Planning and Urban/Regional Policy of the

European Union, Tampere, Saarijävi: Gummerus Printing.Tatzberger (2003) ‘The concept of territorial cohesion in Europe – its genesis and interpretation’, paper for the 2003 AESOP/ACSPO

PhD Workshop Amsterdam, 5-7 July 2003, Austrian Institute for Regional Studies and Spatial Planning (www2.fmg.uva.nl/ame/news/documents/aesop_tatzberger_concept.pdf, visited, 13-10-2003).

Taulelle, F. (2000) ‘Le SDEC  : instrument de l’aménagement du territoire européenne  ?’, Territoires 2020  : Revue d’études et de prospective 1 : 58-66.

Taylor, P.J. (1994) ‘The state as container: territoriality in the modern world-system’, Progress in Human Geography, 18 (2), 151-62.Tewddwr-Jones, M., Bishop, K., and Wilkinson, D. (2000) ‘“Euroscepticism”, political agendas and spatial planning: British national

and regional planning policy in uncertain times’, in: European Planning Studies, 8 (5), p. 651-668.

273

References

Tewdwr-Jones, M. and Williams, R.H. (2001) The European Dimension of British Planning, London: Routledge.Thomson, K.J., and Roberts, D. (2004) ‘Territorial Cohesion and the CAP: EU Conflicts and Evidence’, University of Aberdeen,

COntrbuted paper for AES Annual Conference, 2-4 April 2004.Tolstoj, L.N. (1868) Oorlog en vrede Deel 2, Rainbow Russische Bibliotheek pocket nr. 456, Muntinga, 1999Tonkiss, F. (1998) ‘Analysing discourse’, in C. Seale (ed.) Researching society and culture, London: Sage 245-260.Torgerson, D. (1986) ‘Between knowledge and politics: Three faces of policy analysis’, Policy Sciences, 19, pp. 33-59, Dordrecht:

Martinus Nijhof Publishers.Toulmin, S. (1958) The Uses of Argument, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Uitermark, J. (2005) ‘The genesis and evolution of urban policy: a confrontation of regulationist and governmentality approaches’,

Political Geography 24, Elsevier Ltd., p137-163.Urry, J. (2000) Sociology beyond Societies: Mobilities for the Twenty-first Century. London: Routledge.Valentine, G. (1997) ‘Tell me about …: using interviews as a research methodology’, in R. Flowerdew and D. Martin (eds.), Methods in

Human Geography, Harlow: Longman, 110-126.Varet, L. and Mougeot, M. (2001) ‘L’Etat et l’Aménagement du Territoire’, in L.A Gérard-Varet, J.L Guigou, A. Lipietz et M. Mougeot,

Aménagement du Territoire, La Documentation française, Paris, p. 45-110.Veggeland, N. (1996) Regionens Europa. Innføring i teori og praksis, Oslo: Spartacus Forlag AS. Verdun, A. (1996) ‘The role of the

Delors Committee in the creation of EMU: an epistemic community?’, Journal of European Public Policy, 6(2), pp, 308-328.Vermeersch, C. (1994) Structuurplanning: instrument voor het denken over de vormgeving aan de ruimtelijke structuur, Brugge, Die

Keure (with cooperation of R. Houthaeve).Verschueren, J. (1999) Understanding Pragmatics, London: Arnold.Vickerman, R., Spiekermann, K. and Wegener, M. (1995) ‘Accessibility and Economic Development in Europe’, Espinho: ESF/EC Europconference on European Transport and Communication Networks: Policies on European Networks,

17-23 April.Vickerman, R. (1996) ‘Restructuring of Transport Networks’, Journal of Regional Development, nr. 3.Vogelij, J. and Nauta, Ch. (2004) Territory and Innovation – The Lisbon Strategy, Royal Haskoning Nederland BV Spatial Development,

commissioned by VROM – DG Ruimte, February.Vries, G. de (1995) De ontwikkeling van wetenschap, Een inleiding in de wetenschaps-filosofie, Derde, herziene en uitgebreide

druk,Wolters-Nordhoff: Groningen.Vries, J. de (2002a) Grenzen verkend: Internationalisering van de ruimtelijke planning in de Benelux, Stedelijke en Regionale

Verkenningen 27, Delft, Delft University Press.Vries, J. de (2002b) ‘Venturing into unknown territory: the Making of the Second Benelux Structure Scheme’, paper presented at the

AESOP Conference 30 June-4 July, Grenoble, France.Wachter, S. (ed) (2002) L’aménagement durable: Défis et politiques, DATAR/éditions de l’aube, Paris.Walker, R.B.J. (2000) ‘Europe is Not Where it is Supposed to Be’, in Morten Kelstrup and Michael C. Williams (eds.) International Relations Theory and the Politics of European Integration: Power, Security anda Community, pp. 14-32,

London: Routledge.Walloon Presidency (1993) ‘For a significant step towards a co-ordinated spatial organisation of Europe. Note of the Presidency

concerning the spatial planning discussion of 13 November’, informal meeting of ministers responsible for regional policy and spatial planning, Liège, 12-13 November.

Waterhout, B. (2002) ‘Polycentric Development: What is behind it?’, in: A. Faludi (ed.) European Spatial Planning, Cambridge (MA): Lincoln Institute of Land Policy, 83-103.

Waterhout, B. (2003) ‘Evaluating European Territorial Governance’, Paper for the Third joint ACSP-AESOP Congress 8-12 July 2003 Leuven Belgium, Delft University of Technology, The Netherlands.

Waterhout, B. & Zonneveld, W. (2003) ‘Territoriale Cohesie: een beginsel dat op invulling wacht’, Paper t.b.v. de Plandag 2003 5 juni 2004 te Gent, TU Delft, Onderzoekinstituut OTB.

Waterhout, B, Zonneveld, W. and Meijers, E. (2005) ‘Polycentric Development Policies in Europe: Overview and Debate’, Built Environment 31(2), p. 163-173.

WCED – World Commission on Environment and Development (1987) Our Common Future, Brundtland Report, Oxford: University Press.

Weber, A. (1929/1962) Theory of the Location of Industries, The University of Chicago Press.Weber, M. (1922/1978) Economy and Society, Berkley: University of California Press.Weick, K.E. (1993) ‘The collapse of sensemaking in organizations: the Mann gulch disaster’, Administrative Science Quarterly, 381993,

628-652.Weiler, J.H.H. (1999) The Constitution of Europe: ‘Do the new clothes have an Emperor?’ and other essays on European integration,

Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

274

References

Werner, G. (1996) ‘Die europäische Regionalpolitik im Spannungsfeld zwischen Wachstums- und Ausgleichtpolitik: Die Rolle der Regionalpolitik im Integrationsprozeß der Europäischen Gemeinschaft, Vol. 27, Baden-Baden, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft.

Wernick, A. (1991) Promotional Culture, London: Sage.Wessels, W. (1996) ‘Institutions of the EU-system: models of explanation’ in D. Rometsch and K. Wessels (eds) The European Union

and its Member States: Towards institutional fusion?, pp. 20-36, Manchester: Manchester University Press.Wessels, W. and Rometsch, D. (1996) ‘Conclusion: European Union and national institutions’, in D. Rometsch and K. Wessels (eds) The

European Union and its Member States: Towards institutional fusion?, pp. 328-365, Manchester: Manchester University Press.Weiler, J.H.H. (1999) The Constitution of Europe: ‘Do the new clothes have an Emperor?’ and other essays on European integration,

Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Weiss, C.H. (1977) ‘Evaluation Research in the Political Context’, in E.S. Struening and M. Guttentag (eds), Handbook of Evaluation

Research 1, London: Sage, p. 13-25.Whatmore, S. and Thorne, L. (1997) ‘Nourishing networks: alternative geographies of food’, in Goodman, D. and Watts, M. (Eds.),

Globalising food: agrarian questions and global restructuring, London: Routledge, pp 287-304.Willetts, D. (1992) Modern Conservatism, London: Penguin.Williams, R.H. (1993) Blue Bananas, Grapes and Golden Triangles: Spatial planning for an integrated Europe, Newcastle: Department

of Town and Country Planning, University of Newcastle Upon Tyne.Williams, R.H. (1996) European Union Spatial Policy and Planning, London: Chapman Publishing.Williams, R.H. (1999) ‘Research networking and expert participation in EU policy-making’, paper to the XII AESOP Congress,

Bergen, Norway,, 7-11 July.Williams, R.H. (2000) ‘Constructing the European Spatial Development Perspective: for whom?’, European Planning Studies 8 (3):

357-365.Williams, R., Connoly, P. and Healy, A. (2000) ‘Territorial Impact Assessment: a scoping study. Final draft submission to the Committee

on Spatial Development’, Newcastle: ESPRIN Study Team.Williams, R. and Jørgensen, I. (1998) ‘Europe of the regions and the regions of Europe: the challenge of transnational spatial planning’, Paper for XII AESOP Congress: Planning, Professionals and Public Expectation, Aveiro, Portugal,

22-25 July, 1998.Wilson, E. (1992) The Sphinx in the City: Urban Life, the Control of Disorder, and Women. Los Angeles, CA: University of California

Press.Wiehler, F. and Stumm, T. (1995) ‘The powers of regional and local authorities and their role in the European Union’, European

Planning Studies 3(2): 227-250.Wittgenstein, L. (1998) Tractatus logico-philosophicus, vertaald en van een nawoord en aantekeningen voorzien door W.F. Hermans,

Amsterdam: Athenaeum, Polak & Van Gennep.Wittgenstein, L. (1968) Philosophical Investigations, 3rd Edition, London: Basil Blackwell.Wittgenstein, L. (2002) Filosofische onderzoekingen, Uitgeverij Boom.Wood, D. (1993) The Power of Maps, London: Routledge.Working Group 4c (2001) ‘Multi-level Governance: Linking and Networking the Various Regional and Local Levels (Group 4c)

(http://europa.eu.int/governance/arreas/group10/index_en.htm).Wulf-Mathies, M. (1995) ‘The European Dimension of Spatial Planning’, paper presented at the informal ministerial meeting of

ministers responsible for spatial planning, Madrid, 1 December.Wæver, O. (1997) Discourse Analysis as Foreign Policy Theory: The Case of Germany and Europe (mimeo.), (http://www.ciaonet.org/

wps/wao01/index.html).Wæver, O. (1998) ‘Explaining Europe by Decoding Discourses’, in Anders Wivel (ed.) Explaining European Integration, Copenhagen:

Copenhagen Political Studies Press, pp. 100-146.Wæver, O. (2002) ‘Identity, Communities and Foreign Policy: Discourse Analysis as Foreign Policy Theory’, in Hansen and Wæver

(eds.) European Integration and National Identity, the Challenge of the Nordic States, London: Routledge.Young, I. (1990) Justice and The Politics of Difference. Princeton/New Jersey: Princeton University Press.Yuil, D. (2004) Regional Policy in the Shadow of Reform, A Comparative Overview of Recent Policy Development in the Member States

and Norway, EoRPA Paper 04/1, European Policies Research Centres, Glasgow (October).Zarlenga, S.A. (2002) The Lost Science of Money: The Mythology of Money, The Story of Power, American Monetary Institute.Zetter, J. (2002) ‘Spatial planning in the European Union, 2010’ in A. Faludi (ed.), European Spatial Planning: A North American

Perspective, Boston, MA Lincoln Institute for Land Policy.Zito, A. (1998) ‘Epistemic communities and European integration’, Paper prepared for the ECPR 26th Joint Sessions of Workshops,

University of Warwick, Coventry, UK, 23-28 March.Zonneveld, W. (2000) ‘Discursive Aspects of Strategic Planning: A Deconstruction of the ‘Balanced Competitiveness’ Concept in

European Spatial Planning’, in The Revival of Strategic Spatial Planning, Willem Salet and Andreas Faludi (eds.), Amsterdam: Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences, p. 267-280.

275

References

Zonneveld, W. (2003) Ruimtelijke visievorming in meervoud: Transnationale visies op een hoger plan; Onderzoek in opdracht van DGR, Delft: Onderzoeksinstituut OTB, TU Delft.

Zonneveld, W. and Faludi, A. (1996) ‘Cohesion versus competitive position: a new direction for European spatial planning’, Toronto: The ACSP-AESOP Joint International Congress, 24-28 July, 1996.

Zonneveld, W., Meijers, E. and Waterhout, B. (2005) ‘Polycentric Development Policies across Europe’, Built Environment 31(2), p. 93-176.

Zukin, S. (1998) From Coney Island to Las Vegas in the urban imaginary: discursive practices of growth and decline, Urban Affairs Review, 33(5), pp. 627–654.