Upload
others
View
0
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Uterine Artery Embolization (UAE) vs
Laparoscopy vs HIFU
Thomas J. Vogl, N. NaguibI D I R: Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology
Goethe University Frankfurt, Germany
Disclosure
Speaker name:
Thomas Vogl
I have the following potential conflicts of interest to report:
Consulting
Employment in industry
Stockholder of a healthcare company
Owner of a healthcare company
Other: travel grant
I do not have any potential conflict of interest
Symptomatic treatment of irregular bleeding: gestagen, oestrogen-gestagen combinations endometrial ablation Mirena Esmya
Hysterectomy
Surgery:
hysteroscopy, laparoscopy, laparotomy
Uterine artery embolization
Focused ultrasound:
MR guided HIFU, US guided HAIFU
Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Goethe University, Frankfurt/Main
Uterine Myoma: Treatment Options
Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Goethe University, Frankfurt/Main
Co-operation with the gynecologist is important
Explain the procedure
Discuss the issue of pregnancy fully
Discuss post-interventional pain
Answer patient’s questions
Remember you are dealing with a benign disease
in young women
UAE: Consent andPreinterventional Counseling
Int. iliac artery
Ant. divisionPost. division
Ext. iliac artery
Common iliac artery
85.5%
7.9%
4.2%
1.8%
0.6%
Naguib, Vogl et al, J Vasc Interv Radiol 2008;
19:1569–1575Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Goethe University, Frankfurt/Main
Uterine Artery Origin
Angle Prediction and Effect onRadiation Exposure
Naguib, Vogl et al, Radiology 2009; 251(3):788-795
IDIR Frankfurt
Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Goethe University, Frankfurt/Main
IDIR Frankfurt IDIR Frankfurt
Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Goethe University, Frankfurt/Main
Usage of the Cephalo-caudal Angulation
Angle Prediction and Effect onRadiation Exposure
Nag
uib
et a
l,R
ad
iolo
gy 2
00
9; 2
51
(3):
78
8-7
95
Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Goethe University, Frankfurt/Main
Size: 500-700 µm or 700-900 µm Rarely: 350-500 µm>300 µm obsolete
Embolization Material Selection
Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Goethe University, Frankfurt/Main
Embolization Material Selection
Polyvinyl Alcohol
Bead-Block
Tris-Acryl Gelatin
Microspheres
Embosphere
Gelatin sponge
Gelfoam
Pros
1. Nonresorbable (~Permanant)
2. Precisely calibrated
3. FDA approved for UAE
4. 1st Embolizing material used
by Ravina (conventional)
1. Nonresorbable (~Permanant)
2. Precisely calibrated
3. 1st FDA approved embolizing
material for UAE
4. More deformable and less
tendency to aggregate
1. Not expensive
2. Absorbable within 21 days
(Recanalization after 4
months)1
3. Future pregnancy
Cons
1. Expensive
2. Permanent
1. Expensive
2. Permanent
1. Absorbable ? symptom
recurrence
2. Not calibrated
Barth et al, Invest Radiol 1977; 12:273-280
Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Goethe University, Frankfurt/Main
Prediction of thePredominant Side of Supply
Right Uterine Artery
Left Uterine Artery
Naguib et al, Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2012; 40: 452–458
The resistive index can predict the correct side ofpredominant supply in 81.6% of cases
IDIR Frankfurt
IDIR Frankfurt
Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Goethe University, Frankfurt/Main
Effect of Location of Leiomyomaon the Outcome
Naguib, Vogl et al, J Vasc Interv Radiol 2010; 21:490–495
Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Goethe University, Frankfurt/Main
Embolization Material Selection
1. Worthington-Kirsch et al. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2011; 34:493-5012. Spies et al. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2004; 15:793-8003. Yu et al. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2011; 22:1229-12354. Abramowitz et al. Radiology. 2009 ; 250(2):482-4875. Katsumori et al. AJR 2002;178:135–1396. Song et al. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2013 Dec;22(6):364-71
Polyvinyl Alcohol versus Microspheres:
Similar outcome for both types 1,2
Better clinical outcome and devascularization for Microspheres than polyvinyl
alcohol3,4
Gelfoam versus Polyvinyl alcohol:
Gelatin sponge particles alone is a safe and effective treatment for symptomatic
leiomyomas and that the outcomes bear comparison with PVA 5
Gelatin sponge particles over PVA in terms of improvement of mean bleeding
score and volume reduction rate of dominant fibroid after three months 6
Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Goethe University, Frankfurt/Main
CathetersLeft side:Cobra 4F or 5F
Right side:Cobra 5F with modified Waltman loop1
Sidewinder 5FSidewinder 5F with Microcatheter
1. Pelage et al, Radiology 1999; 210:573-575
Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Goethe University, Frankfurt/Main
Patterns of enhancement
Prognosis
Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Goethe University, Frankfurt/Main
MRI Immediately After UAE
MRI Immediately After UAE
Endometrial-myometrial Ischemia
Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Goethe University, Frankfurt/Main
UAE: Take Home Points
1. You are dealing with a benign tumor in young age
2. MRI before UAE will help select patients
3. Add MRA to detect anatomy and reduce radiation
exposure
4. +/- Doppler to predict predominant side of supply
5. Do not forget the cephalo-caudal angulation option
6. Do not use a size below 300 μm
7. Embosphere > PVA, Gelfoam
8. Use the catheter you can master
9. +/- MRI immediately after UAE for enhancement pattern
10. First follow-up MRI not before 3 months
Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Goethe University, Frankfurt/Main
1. Patients with symptomatic uterine leiomyoma not
responding to medical treatment
2. Clear acoustic pathway of leiomyoma
3. Patient compliance
4. Signal intensity on T2 weighted MRI
5. Contraindications include: pregnancy, pelvic malignancy
or active inflammatory process, extensive scarring or
surgical clips
Patient Selection for HIFU
Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Goethe University, Frankfurt/Main
Peng et al, Medicine (Baltimore) 2015 Apr; 94(13):e650
Factors increasing ablation
difficulty:
1. Retroverted uterus
2. Posterior location of tumor
3. Intramural leiomyoma
Factors influencing the amount of
energy required:
1. Leiomyoma size (large need
less energy)
2. T2 signal intensity
3. Enhancement (progressive
enhancement need more)
4. Acoustic pathway
HIFU: Patient SelectionFactors Affecting Treatment
Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Goethe University, Frankfurt/Main
Zhang et al, Int J Hyperthermia 2015; 31(3):280-284
7,439 Patients treated in 10 centres in China
between 2006 and 2013:
The average treatment time was 84.2±38.8 min (range 30 -
240 min)
The sonication time was 1243.8±725.2 (range 506–2658) s
The technical success rate was 98.4% (7319/7439)
The NPV ratio was 83.1±15.6% (range 25–100%)
The re-intervention rate was less than 10% after 24-month
follow-up
HIFU: Results
Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Goethe University, Frankfurt/Main
Cheung et al, J Ultrasound Med 2013; 32:1353–1358
HIFU: Results
Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Goethe University, Frankfurt/Main
Before HIFU After HIFU
46-year-old patient – Goethe University FFM
HIFU: Results
Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Goethe University, Frankfurt/Main
HIFU should be considered as one of the treatment
options for patients with symptomatic uterine
leiomyoma not responding to medical treatment.
Careful selection of the patient is important to ensure
safe and effective treatment.
The issue of pregnancy should be thoroughly
discussed with patients who haven‘t completed their
family plans.
HIFU: Conclusions
Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Goethe University, Frankfurt/Main
Chitta
wa
r P
B e
t a
l, C
urr
Opin
Obste
t G
yn
eco
l 2
01
5 D
ec; 2
7(6
):3
91
-7
Review of nonsurgical/minimally invasive treatments and
open myomectomy for uterine fibroids
FISI 2019
www.fisi-frankfurt.de
20. Frankfurter Interdisziplinäres Symposium für
Innovative Diagnostik und Therapie
Frankfurt/Main, 15 – 16. November 2019
Computertomographie
Before HIFU After HIFU
44-year-old patient – Goethe University FFM
HIFU: Results
Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Goethe University, Frankfurt/Main
Qin et al, Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2012 Jun;117(3):273-7
24 out of 435 patients had unintended pregnancies within 1 year after HIFU
8 desired
pregnancies
14 undesired
pregnancies
2 spontaneous
abortions
14 elective
abortions
One
abortion
7 reached
full-term -
no complications
HIFU and Pregnancy
Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Goethe University, Frankfurt/Main
Review of nonsurgical/minimally invasive treatments and
open myomectomy for uterine fibroids
CONCLUSION:For a woman with symptomatic fibroids who wishes to retain her uterus, apart from medical treatment, various nonsurgical and minimally invasive conservative surgical options are available.Among the nonsurgical options, UAE and, in eligible patients,MRgFUS are more established with availability of larger data and comparative efficacy. Minimally invasive surgeries (laparoscopic and robotic approach) have definite advantage over open myomectomy in terms of less postoperative pain andfaster recovery. A transvaginal approach for radiofrequency ablation as an outpatient procedure seems to be a promising new nonsurgical alternative although it requires more evidence before it can be accepted in day-to-day practice.
Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Goethe University, Frankfurt/Main
Chittawar PB et al, Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2015 Dec; 27(6):391-7
Effect of Location of Leiomyomaon the Outcome
IDIR Frankfurt IDIR Frankfurt
Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Goethe University, Frankfurt/Main
IDIR FrankfurtIDIR Frankfurt
Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Goethe University, Frankfurt/Main
MR Angiography BeforeUterine Artery Embolization
Follow-up after 3 months
HIFU: Results
Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Goethe University, Frankfurt/Main
Usage of the Cephalo-caudal Angulation
An additional cephalo-caudal angulation was
required in 15% of patients for the right side.
An additional cephalo-caudal angulation was
required in 30% of patients for the left side.
Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Goethe University, Frankfurt/Main
Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Goethe University, Frankfurt/Main
1. Exclude contraindications
2. Set baseline
3. Select your patients (avoid
leiomyomas >12 cm,
multiplicity is not bad)
IDIR Frankfurt
IDIR Frankfurt
MRI Before Uterine Artery Embolization
Prediction of thePredominant Side of Supply
Left Uterine Artery RI = 0.64
Right Uterine Artery RI = 0.72
IDIR Frankfurt
IDIR Frankfurt
Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Goethe University, Frankfurt/Main
Prediction of thePredominant Side of Supply
Failed to embolize one side
Predominant side
Contralateral puncture
Second intervention
Non-predominant side
Wait and see
Second intervention
Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Goethe University, Frankfurt/Main
Institut für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Goethe-Universität, Frankfurt
HIFU
Uterine Artery Embolization (UAE) vs
Laparoscopy vs HIFU
Thomas J. Vogl, N. NaguibI D I R: Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology
Goethe University Frankfurt, Germany