19
Using Proactive Advising to Improve Student Success and Retention for At-Risk and Conditionally Admitted Students in a Global Campus Setting Jamie Guigar Storey Central Michigan University

Using Proactive Advising to Improve Student Success and

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    2

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Using Proactive Advising to Improve Student Success and

Using Proactive Advising to

Improve Student Success and

Retention for At-Risk and

Conditionally Admitted

Students in a Global Campus

Setting Jamie Guigar Storey

Central Michigan University

Page 2: Using Proactive Advising to Improve Student Success and

What to Expect?

• Overview of CMU’s Global Campus

• Global Campus Persistence & Retention

Information

• Discussing At-Risk Student

Characteristics

• Foundational Theory

• Global Campus Advising Overview

• Proactive Advising/Retention Initiatives

Page 3: Using Proactive Advising to Improve Student Success and

CMU’s Global Campus

• 38 locations

• 20 at military

locations

• 2014 Total

enrollment 27,069

• 7,211 off-campus

Page 4: Using Proactive Advising to Improve Student Success and

Student Demographics

• Average Age

• Ethnic Background

• Socioeconomic Status

• Employment Status

• Military

• Location

Page 5: Using Proactive Advising to Improve Student Success and

Retention Information

The 2014 First Enrolled Degree Seeking

retention rate for Global Campus students at

Central Michigan University (CMU).

Total

Students

Retention

Rate

Persistence

Forecast

Students

Lost

Undergraduate 775 62% 481 295

Page 6: Using Proactive Advising to Improve Student Success and

What makes a student at-risk?

• Number of Transfer Credits?

• SAT/ACT Scores?

• High School or Transfer GPA?

• Number of Colleges Previously Attended?

• Time of Application?

• Difficulty of Signed Major?

• Ethnicity?

• Socioeconomic Status?

• Gender?

• Age?

Page 7: Using Proactive Advising to Improve Student Success and

Undergraduate Retention

Total

Students

Retention

Rate

Persistence

Forecast

Students

Lost

FTIAC 52 32% 17 35

0-12 44 43% 19 25

13-24 33 53% 17 16

25-48 123 66% 81 42

49+ 523 69% 361 162

Page 8: Using Proactive Advising to Improve Student Success and

Undergraduate Retention

Total

Students

Retention

Rate

Persistence

Forecast

Students

Lost

F-2-F 223 74% 165 58

Online 552 57% 315 237

Total 775 62% 480 295

Page 9: Using Proactive Advising to Improve Student Success and

Foundational Theory

• Tinto’s Theory of Student Departure

• Students’ interactions (positive or

negative) with staff and faculty impact

academic career and commitment to

earning a degree (Pascarella &

Terenzini, 2005).

Page 10: Using Proactive Advising to Improve Student Success and

CMU Team-Based Approach

• Enrollment Specialist

• Admissions Specialist

• Academic Advisor

• Program Administrator

• Graduation Specialist

Page 11: Using Proactive Advising to Improve Student Success and

Advising Overview

Page 12: Using Proactive Advising to Improve Student Success and

Proactive Advising Initiative

Page 13: Using Proactive Advising to Improve Student Success and

Proactive Advising Initiative

Page 14: Using Proactive Advising to Improve Student Success and

Success Marker Courses

• Success Marker Courses are courses that have historically low “D,” “E,” and “W” rates.

• At-risk students must select first 2-4 courses in consultation with advisor.

• ART 126

• AST 111

• BIO 315

• BIS 104

• ENT 101

• ENV 101

• FNS 370

• JRN 350

• LDR 200

• MUS 110

• PHY 100

• BLR 202

• HDF 110

• HSC 235

• HSC 317

• HSC 352

• MGT 312

• MGT 320

• MGT 348

• MKT 310

• PSY 324

• REL 101

• REL 334

Page 15: Using Proactive Advising to Improve Student Success and

Non-Success Marker

Courses

• High “D,” “E,” and “W” Rates

• Students are encouraged to wait to register for these courses until their 2nd or 3rd semester.

• BIO 101

• BIS 360

• CHM 120

• ENG 101

• ENG 201

• GEL 105

• MTH 105

• MTH 106

• MTH 130

• MTH 132

• ENG 303

• ENG 326

• ENT 210

• ENG 221

• PHL 140

• PSC 105

• PSC 210

• PSY 100

• PSY 211

• PSY 310

Page 16: Using Proactive Advising to Improve Student Success and

Collaborative Initiatives

• Admitted, Not Enrolled Campaign

• Early Alert

• Online Ally

• Student Success Blackboard Shell

• Student Success Coaching

Page 17: Using Proactive Advising to Improve Student Success and

Success Course Retention Rates

Total

Students

Retention

Rate

Persistence

Forecast

Students

Lost

2014-2015

≤48 Credits 121 62% 75 46

Total

Students

Retention

Rate

Persistence

Forecast

Students

Lost

2013-2014

≤48 Credits 252 48.5% 134 118

Page 18: Using Proactive Advising to Improve Student Success and

Reference

Pascarella, E. T., & Terenzini, P. T.

(2005). How college affects student: A

third decade of research (2nd ed.).San

Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Page 19: Using Proactive Advising to Improve Student Success and

Questions

Contact Information

– Jamie Guigar Storey

– Email: [email protected]