39
Using Performance Standards to Mitigate Customer Disputes Matthew J. Whipple and Frank C. Thompson Presented by: J2059931

Using Performance Standards to Mitigate Customer Disputes€¦ · Builder is in best position to perform in “reasonably workmanlike manner” and to ensure building is fit for purpose

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    0

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Using Performance Standards to Mitigate Customer Disputes€¦ · Builder is in best position to perform in “reasonably workmanlike manner” and to ensure building is fit for purpose

Using Performance Standards to Mitigate Customer Disputes

Matthew J. Whipple and Frank C. Thompson

Presented by:

J2059931

Page 2: Using Performance Standards to Mitigate Customer Disputes€¦ · Builder is in best position to perform in “reasonably workmanlike manner” and to ensure building is fit for purpose

2

Page 3: Using Performance Standards to Mitigate Customer Disputes€¦ · Builder is in best position to perform in “reasonably workmanlike manner” and to ensure building is fit for purpose

3

Page 4: Using Performance Standards to Mitigate Customer Disputes€¦ · Builder is in best position to perform in “reasonably workmanlike manner” and to ensure building is fit for purpose

The “Default” Universe Basic Contract, Description of Work And Price Warranties are Implied

Not Well Defined, Unclear Duration and Content

Enforced Only In Court Likely Court of Common Pleas Need an Attorney/Long Road of Litigation

Decided By Judge Or Jury No Expertise in Construction Likely Sympathetic to Homeowner Uncapped Risk Exposure

4

Page 5: Using Performance Standards to Mitigate Customer Disputes€¦ · Builder is in best position to perform in “reasonably workmanlike manner” and to ensure building is fit for purpose

The “Controlled Universe” Detailed Contract, Includes Dispute Resolution

Mechanisms Warranties and Standards Are Express

Defined in both content and duration

Alternative Dispute Resolution More Cost Effective Decided by Neutral with Expertise

Show benefits of controlled universe and give contractual guidance for how to make it happen

5

Page 6: Using Performance Standards to Mitigate Customer Disputes€¦ · Builder is in best position to perform in “reasonably workmanlike manner” and to ensure building is fit for purpose

General Warranty Principles Warranty is “an express or implied promise that

something in furtherance of a contract is guaranteed by one of the parties” (Black’s Law Dictionary)

6

Page 7: Using Performance Standards to Mitigate Customer Disputes€¦ · Builder is in best position to perform in “reasonably workmanlike manner” and to ensure building is fit for purpose

General Warranty Principles

7

Page 8: Using Performance Standards to Mitigate Customer Disputes€¦ · Builder is in best position to perform in “reasonably workmanlike manner” and to ensure building is fit for purpose

General Warranty Principles A guarantee of quality, condition, or functionality,

related to goods or services May be “Express” or “Implied” “Implied” warranty is one that arises by operation of law. “Express” warranty is explicitly granted by one party

Often related to a contract, but does not have to be part of a contract

Legally Binding Obligation

8

Page 9: Using Performance Standards to Mitigate Customer Disputes€¦ · Builder is in best position to perform in “reasonably workmanlike manner” and to ensure building is fit for purpose

Implied Warranties

Warranty implied by law/courts Do not need to intend to make warranty Often designed to protect consumers/buyers

(minimal level of protection) Examples:

Workmanlike Construction/Habitability Builder is in best position to perform in “reasonably

workmanlike manner” and to ensure building is fit for purpose of habitation

Not well defined/question of degree

9

Page 10: Using Performance Standards to Mitigate Customer Disputes€¦ · Builder is in best position to perform in “reasonably workmanlike manner” and to ensure building is fit for purpose

Examples (continued) Merchantability

Applies to sale of goods Product will perform like products of similar type Typical lawnmower lasts 5 years, all lawnmowers

should last that long Fitness for Particular Purpose

Goods should be fit for purpose intended Insulation will keep room at certain temperature

10

Page 11: Using Performance Standards to Mitigate Customer Disputes€¦ · Builder is in best position to perform in “reasonably workmanlike manner” and to ensure building is fit for purpose

General Warranty Principles

Problem is uncertainty – duration, scope, remedy

Breach of Implied Warranty -Workmanlike Manner

In the absence of an express agreement to the contrary, the law implies a promise by a builder that the construction will be performed in a reasonably good and workmanlike manner and in accordance with good usage and accepted trade practices, resulting in a merchantable structure. “Good and workmanlike” means that quality of work performed by one who has the knowledge, training, or experience necessary for the successful practice of a trade or occupation and performed in a manner generally considered proficient by those capable of judging such work.

11

Page 12: Using Performance Standards to Mitigate Customer Disputes€¦ · Builder is in best position to perform in “reasonably workmanlike manner” and to ensure building is fit for purpose

General Warranty Principles (Cont’d)

“Workmanlike” may also be defined as the degree of care that a skilled workman, in this instance a [contractor], would exercise under like or similar circumstances in the community in which the work is done.

12

Page 13: Using Performance Standards to Mitigate Customer Disputes€¦ · Builder is in best position to perform in “reasonably workmanlike manner” and to ensure building is fit for purpose

General Warranty Principles (Cont’d)

Court, and likely jury, will decide these things No particular expertise, have to be educated on

the spot by professionals with conflicting opinions May be sympathetic to homeowner/consumer

13

Page 14: Using Performance Standards to Mitigate Customer Disputes€¦ · Builder is in best position to perform in “reasonably workmanlike manner” and to ensure building is fit for purpose

Implied Warranties may be disclaimed (if proper procedures followed) If you can disclaim, why give any warranty?

Customer relations/business reasons The “Tommy Boy” effect – stand behind your work

No warranty may be unenforceable in certain circumstances, particularly warranty of habitability. Express warranty more likely enforceable

14

Page 15: Using Performance Standards to Mitigate Customer Disputes€¦ · Builder is in best position to perform in “reasonably workmanlike manner” and to ensure building is fit for purpose

Express Warranty Terms explicitly stated, usually both in function

and duration Can be written or oral Most home construction contracts, both new

construction and remodeling, reference some express warranty

Example – roof will last for 20 years

15

Page 16: Using Performance Standards to Mitigate Customer Disputes€¦ · Builder is in best position to perform in “reasonably workmanlike manner” and to ensure building is fit for purpose

Limited Warranty

Many agreements have general language about a “one year warranty” Confusion about builder’s warranty and

manufacturer’s warranty May be unenforceable May be unclear as to scope, how to address

alleged problems Sample Agreement in Handout

Incorporates reference to “Residential Construction Performance Guidelines,” published by National Association of Home Builders16

Page 17: Using Performance Standards to Mitigate Customer Disputes€¦ · Builder is in best position to perform in “reasonably workmanlike manner” and to ensure building is fit for purpose

Performance Guidelines Generally

Comprehensive set of recommendations for standards in residential construction, both how to assess problems and appropriate remedies

Meant to give clarity to the contractor, but also peace of mind to the homeowner

17

Page 18: Using Performance Standards to Mitigate Customer Disputes€¦ · Builder is in best position to perform in “reasonably workmanlike manner” and to ensure building is fit for purpose

The NAHB Residential Construction Performance Guidelines

• Beyond building codes and local regulations, builders, remodelers and their customers have sought measurable benchmarks that deal with the expectations of performance and workmanship in the products provided by the residential construction industry.

• Codes address matter of health, safety and welfare, these guidelines match expectations of performance and workmanship.

18

Page 19: Using Performance Standards to Mitigate Customer Disputes€¦ · Builder is in best position to perform in “reasonably workmanlike manner” and to ensure building is fit for purpose

History of the Guidelines

• The core of these guidelines were first established under insured warranty programs.

• More than 20 years ago the NAHB Remodelers embraced similar standards.

• NAHB Remodelers and the NAHB Single Family Builders Committee combined to publish the first edition in 1996.

• The fifth edition has just been compiled and published.

19

Page 20: Using Performance Standards to Mitigate Customer Disputes€¦ · Builder is in best position to perform in “reasonably workmanlike manner” and to ensure building is fit for purpose

Fifth Edition

20

Page 21: Using Performance Standards to Mitigate Customer Disputes€¦ · Builder is in best position to perform in “reasonably workmanlike manner” and to ensure building is fit for purpose

Scope of the guidelines• A collection of minimum performance criteria.• Many contractors build to tighter tolerances.• Not intended to answer all questions related

to construction workmanship and performance in a specific residential project.

• Based on building techniques and quality measures across the United States.

• Local variations in techniques, materials, or environmental conditions may render some guidelines inappropriate in evaluation or remedy. 21

Page 22: Using Performance Standards to Mitigate Customer Disputes€¦ · Builder is in best position to perform in “reasonably workmanlike manner” and to ensure building is fit for purpose

• In that instance, the parties should provide in writing another standard to take precedence.

• The Guidelines have the flexibility to reflect remodeling specific conditions such as out of plumb or out of level existing structures.

• The Guidelines are available for purchase at the NAHB Builder Books table in the conference hallway exhibit area and may also be purchased online at builderbooks.com

• Here are a few specific examples of the Guidelines.

22

Page 23: Using Performance Standards to Mitigate Customer Disputes€¦ · Builder is in best position to perform in “reasonably workmanlike manner” and to ensure building is fit for purpose

23

Page 24: Using Performance Standards to Mitigate Customer Disputes€¦ · Builder is in best position to perform in “reasonably workmanlike manner” and to ensure building is fit for purpose

24

Page 25: Using Performance Standards to Mitigate Customer Disputes€¦ · Builder is in best position to perform in “reasonably workmanlike manner” and to ensure building is fit for purpose

25

Page 26: Using Performance Standards to Mitigate Customer Disputes€¦ · Builder is in best position to perform in “reasonably workmanlike manner” and to ensure building is fit for purpose

26

Page 27: Using Performance Standards to Mitigate Customer Disputes€¦ · Builder is in best position to perform in “reasonably workmanlike manner” and to ensure building is fit for purpose

Implementation of Guidelines

Unlike building code, do not apply by default Incorporate into contract, depending on

engagement, may want to incorporate specific sections/provide applicable sections to homeowner in advance

27

Page 28: Using Performance Standards to Mitigate Customer Disputes€¦ · Builder is in best position to perform in “reasonably workmanlike manner” and to ensure building is fit for purpose

Implementation of Guidelines (con’t)

Exclude other warranties Sample language (from standard PBA Model

Agreement): OWNER VOLUNTARILY, KNOWINGLY AND INTENTIONALLY,

AFTER HAVING HAD THE OPPORTUNITY TO CONSULT WITH SEPARATE COUNSEL, HEREBY UNCONDITIONALLY WAIVES ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTY OF HABITABILITY, INCLUDING WITH RESPECT TO ANY LATENT DEFECTS, AND ANY IMPLIED WARRANTY OF WORKMANLIKE CONSTRUCTION AND ANY OTHER EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES EXCEPT FOR THOSE SPECIFICALLY SET FORTH [HEREIN]

28

Page 29: Using Performance Standards to Mitigate Customer Disputes€¦ · Builder is in best position to perform in “reasonably workmanlike manner” and to ensure building is fit for purpose

Right to Repair Clause

Notice of Claim and Right to Repair Handout Can be tailored to situation

Major features: Places requirement on homeowner to notify

contractor within 30 days of discovery of an alleged defect Prevents aggrieved homeowner from simply initiating a

dispute Gives right of inspection, before homeowner takes

any action

29

Page 30: Using Performance Standards to Mitigate Customer Disputes€¦ · Builder is in best position to perform in “reasonably workmanlike manner” and to ensure building is fit for purpose

Right to Repair Clause

Gives right to correct work that might be defective

Opportunity to explain if not at fault Tries to keep lines of communication open If no agreement, document steps in writing

and provide to homeowner

30

Page 31: Using Performance Standards to Mitigate Customer Disputes€¦ · Builder is in best position to perform in “reasonably workmanlike manner” and to ensure building is fit for purpose

Alternative Dispute Resolution

ADR is an alternative way to traditional litigation to resolve disputes

Takes many forms, most often “mediation” and “arbitration”

Mediation is usually non-binding, negotiation with outside input

Arbitration is binding, a decision by one neutral or a panel

31

Page 32: Using Performance Standards to Mitigate Customer Disputes€¦ · Builder is in best position to perform in “reasonably workmanlike manner” and to ensure building is fit for purpose

Alternative Dispute Resolution

Goals are to both cheaper and quicker than litigation Complaint to trial is easily a year ADR, particularly for smaller claims, can be weeks

or months Additional goal is decision maker with subject

matter expertise. Can be a lawyer or ex-judge, but could also be an engineer, architect, or contractor

32

Page 33: Using Performance Standards to Mitigate Customer Disputes€¦ · Builder is in best position to perform in “reasonably workmanlike manner” and to ensure building is fit for purpose

ADR (con’t)

Preserves privacy of dispute process Reduces risk of large judgments

33

Page 34: Using Performance Standards to Mitigate Customer Disputes€¦ · Builder is in best position to perform in “reasonably workmanlike manner” and to ensure building is fit for purpose

ADR Clauses

ADR generally must be laid out in contract Some courts have mandatory ADR for certain

types of cases Under PA’s Home Improvement Consumer

Protection Act, specific requirements as to form of clause, font, signature lines, recovery of attorney’s fees. See Sample Clause Handout, designed to comply

with HICPA guidelines

34

Page 35: Using Performance Standards to Mitigate Customer Disputes€¦ · Builder is in best position to perform in “reasonably workmanlike manner” and to ensure building is fit for purpose

ADR Clauses

Efficiency of ADR is only as effective as the clause

General ADR clause can be problematic Lawyer as arbitrator, may see dispute as litigation,

allow arbitration to drag on Sample clause is more specific, includes

requirements for the arbitrator, pre-hearing discovery, time frame for holding arbitration

35

Page 36: Using Performance Standards to Mitigate Customer Disputes€¦ · Builder is in best position to perform in “reasonably workmanlike manner” and to ensure building is fit for purpose

ADR and Performance Guidelines

Work in tandem to address disputes Guidelines give more objective standards Curtails protracted litigation battles Tiered escalation

Notice of Claim/Right of Repair Possible Mediation Arbitration with clear guidelines

36

Page 37: Using Performance Standards to Mitigate Customer Disputes€¦ · Builder is in best position to perform in “reasonably workmanlike manner” and to ensure building is fit for purpose

Construction Dispute Resolution Services

• CDRS is a nationwide professional dispute resolution firm that specializes in both residential and commercial construction disputes and is available to conduct mediations and/or arbitrations.

• CDRS provides construction specialists and expert witnesses for any form of dispute resolution including civil litigation.

• Trained in mediation and arbitration.

37

Page 38: Using Performance Standards to Mitigate Customer Disputes€¦ · Builder is in best position to perform in “reasonably workmanlike manner” and to ensure building is fit for purpose

• Many of the CDRS professionals are / have been, licensed contractors, architects, home inspectors, building code officials, construction attorneys or other construction related industry personnel who can provide an expertise that only an experienced construction related professional can provide.

• Several local professionals including Frank Thompson.

• Visit us at http://www.constructiondisputes-cdrs.com for more information.

38

Page 39: Using Performance Standards to Mitigate Customer Disputes€¦ · Builder is in best position to perform in “reasonably workmanlike manner” and to ensure building is fit for purpose

Questions?

Matthew J. Whipple, Esq.(412) 566-6116 | [email protected]