9
Cost/Benefit Analysis of Military Training 2012-06-06 Using perfomance evaluation methods for cost/benefits analysis

Using perfomance evaluation methods for cost /benefits analysis

  • Upload
    kedma

  • View
    26

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Using perfomance evaluation methods for cost /benefits analysis. Cost /Benefit Analysis of Military Training 2012-06-06. Alexander Ahl Analyst MSc Computer Science FOI (2006) S econded OA to SwAF , 2006-. Camilla Andersson Deputy Research Director MSc Operations Research - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Using perfomance evaluation methods  for  cost /benefits  analysis

Cost/Benefit Analysis of Military Training2012-06-06

Using perfomance evaluation methods for cost/benefits analysis

Page 2: Using perfomance evaluation methods  for  cost /benefits  analysis

• Alexander Ahl• Analyst• MSc Computer Science

• FOI (2006) • Seconded OA to SwAF, 2006-

• Camilla Andersson• Deputy Research Director• MSc Operations Research• MSc Physics

• FOI (1997)• Seconded OA to SwAF, 2004-

2007, 2009-2011

Page 3: Using perfomance evaluation methods  for  cost /benefits  analysis

Hypothis test• Currently Sweden conducts continuous performance

assessments, which allows us to track the unit’s development throughout its lifetime.

• How can this be used for cost/benefit analyses?

Page 4: Using perfomance evaluation methods  for  cost /benefits  analysis

Unit development cycle

Training Predeployment Operation Recuperation Training

2 Years

Page 5: Using perfomance evaluation methods  for  cost /benefits  analysis

Swedish Training Concept

Basic Training

Platoon

Company & Platoon

Battalion & Company

Battalion

Battalion with

branches

Performance

Time

Page 6: Using perfomance evaluation methods  for  cost /benefits  analysis
Page 7: Using perfomance evaluation methods  for  cost /benefits  analysis

Swedish Training Concept

Basic Training

Platoon

Company & Platoon

Battalion & Company

Battalion

Battalion with

branches

Performance

Time

Page 8: Using perfomance evaluation methods  for  cost /benefits  analysis

Comparisons• Same unit different year• Same type of unit same year

• Change in number of exercises• Change in type/quality of exercises

• Investment/procurement – Simulation equipment– Increased number material

Page 9: Using perfomance evaluation methods  for  cost /benefits  analysis