37
Using Estradiol Cypionate Using Estradiol Cypionate (ECP®) vs. GnRH in (ECP®) vs. GnRH in Controlled Controlled A.I.-Breeding Programs A.I.-Breeding Programs Jeffrey S. Stevenson, Ph.D. Kansas State University

Using Estradiol Cypionate (ECP®) vs. GnRH in Controlled A.I.-Breeding Programs Jeffrey S. Stevenson, Ph.D. Kansas State University

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Using Estradiol Cypionate (ECP®) vs. GnRH in Controlled A.I.-Breeding Programs Jeffrey S. Stevenson, Ph.D. Kansas State University

Using Estradiol Cypionate Using Estradiol Cypionate (ECP®) vs. GnRH in Controlled(ECP®) vs. GnRH in Controlled

A.I.-Breeding ProgramsA.I.-Breeding Programs

Jeffrey S. Stevenson, Ph.D.Kansas State University

Page 2: Using Estradiol Cypionate (ECP®) vs. GnRH in Controlled A.I.-Breeding Programs Jeffrey S. Stevenson, Ph.D. Kansas State University

Why Substitute Estrogen for GnRH?Why Substitute Estrogen for GnRH?

• Estrogen induces:

– Sexual behavior--estrus

– Uterine tone

– Secretion of mucus

• Cows may be somewhat easier to inseminate at timed AI.

• Increased estrus activity has positive psychological effects on those inseminating cows.

• Estrogen is significantly less costly.

Page 3: Using Estradiol Cypionate (ECP®) vs. GnRH in Controlled A.I.-Breeding Programs Jeffrey S. Stevenson, Ph.D. Kansas State University

How Do Estrogen and GnRH Work?How Do Estrogen and GnRH Work?

GnRH is secreted by the hypothalamus and induces release of LH and FSH from the AP.

Hypothalamus

Anterior pituitary

gland (AP)

LH

EOnset of ovulation

27 hrEstrus

Onset of estrus

GnRH induces the LH surge in response to increased estrogen (E) associated with the onset of estrus.

Follicle

LH

GnRH

Page 4: Using Estradiol Cypionate (ECP®) vs. GnRH in Controlled A.I.-Breeding Programs Jeffrey S. Stevenson, Ph.D. Kansas State University

EstrogensEstrogens

Principal estrogen secreted by the follicle

Estradiol benzoate

Estradiol valerate

Estradiol cypionate

Estradiol-17

Mimicks estradiol-17 most closely (half-life nearly equal)

Longer-acting estrogen (sold as ECP®)

Longest-acting estrogen; was part of Syncro-Mate B® estrus-synchronization protocol (not available)

Page 5: Using Estradiol Cypionate (ECP®) vs. GnRH in Controlled A.I.-Breeding Programs Jeffrey S. Stevenson, Ph.D. Kansas State University

Extra Label Use of DrugsExtra Label Use of Drugs

• Extra label use means a drug is used for purposes NOT listed as one of its Indications on the bottle label or bottle insert.

• For example, the label for each GnRH product indicates that its approved use is for the treatment of ovarian follicular cysts.

• Use of GnRH in any estrus-synchronization or ovulation control program is considered to be an extra labelextra label use.

FERTAGYL®

Factrel®

CYSTORELIN®

OvaCyst®

Page 6: Using Estradiol Cypionate (ECP®) vs. GnRH in Controlled A.I.-Breeding Programs Jeffrey S. Stevenson, Ph.D. Kansas State University

Extra Label Use of DrugsExtra Label Use of Drugs

• GnRH products have therapuetic approvals for use in cattle in the U.S.

• Strict interpretation of Animal Medicinal Drug Use Clarification Act (AMDUCA) is that GnRH products cannot be used for production purposes in cattle.

• However, GnRH products are being used extensively for estrus-synchronization programs by veterinarians and academic researchers who have published their results in scientific journals and producer press.

Page 7: Using Estradiol Cypionate (ECP®) vs. GnRH in Controlled A.I.-Breeding Programs Jeffrey S. Stevenson, Ph.D. Kansas State University

Extra Label Use of DrugsExtra Label Use of Drugs

• GnRH is a peptide (very small protein with a short blood half life) with no known health concerns.

• FDA must have minimal concerns regarding use of GnRH products in estrus-synchronization programs because no known prosecutions have been initiated.

Page 8: Using Estradiol Cypionate (ECP®) vs. GnRH in Controlled A.I.-Breeding Programs Jeffrey S. Stevenson, Ph.D. Kansas State University

• Estradiol benzoate (EB) has no human or animal approval in the U.S.

• Strict interpretation of AMDUCA is that EB cannot be used for production purposes in cattle.

• Therefore, use of EB in cattle for estrus-synchronization programs is illegal.

• Use of EB also is illegal when compounded with any other approved product.

• Use of the Eazi-Breed™ CIDR® Cattle insert plus Lutalyse® is an approvedapproved compounding of products.

Illegal Use of Drugs andIllegal Use of Drugs andCompounding of ProductsCompounding of Products

EB

Page 9: Using Estradiol Cypionate (ECP®) vs. GnRH in Controlled A.I.-Breeding Programs Jeffrey S. Stevenson, Ph.D. Kansas State University

What Estrogen is Approved?What Estrogen is Approved?

• Estradiol cypionate (ECP) has a therapeutic label for use in cattle in the U.S.

• It is the only estrogen approved for use in cattle is ECP® (Pharmacia)

• ECP has multiple label indications including “to correct anestrus [absence of heat period] in the absence of follicular cysts” at 3 to 5 mg doses.

Page 10: Using Estradiol Cypionate (ECP®) vs. GnRH in Controlled A.I.-Breeding Programs Jeffrey S. Stevenson, Ph.D. Kansas State University

Use of ECP in Breeding ProgramsUse of ECP in Breeding Programs

• Strict interpretation of AMDUCA is that ECP cannot be used for production purposes in cattle.

• Because ECP is an estrogen, it is of concern to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration-Center for Veterinary Medicine relative to human health and safety.

Page 11: Using Estradiol Cypionate (ECP®) vs. GnRH in Controlled A.I.-Breeding Programs Jeffrey S. Stevenson, Ph.D. Kansas State University

Use of ECP in Breeding ProgramsUse of ECP in Breeding Programs

• ECP is being used extensively for estrus-synchronization programs by veterinarians and academic researchers who have published their results in scientific journals and producer press.

• FDA has not initiated prosecutions of either researchers or veterinarians using ECP in cattle estrus-synchronization programs.

Page 12: Using Estradiol Cypionate (ECP®) vs. GnRH in Controlled A.I.-Breeding Programs Jeffrey S. Stevenson, Ph.D. Kansas State University

Follicle ControlFollicle Control

–7

Upfront GnRH PGF

Synchronized initiation of a new

follicular wave

Ovulation Ovulation

GnRH

Onset of the breeding season

Upfront Estrogen

0

Ovulation or follicle turnover?

Ovulation of a smaller follicle

Page 13: Using Estradiol Cypionate (ECP®) vs. GnRH in Controlled A.I.-Breeding Programs Jeffrey S. Stevenson, Ph.D. Kansas State University

What Must Estrogen Do To Replace What Must Estrogen Do To Replace GnRH in Breeding Programs?GnRH in Breeding Programs?

• Estrogen must induce upfront follicle turnover in a synchronization program in cycling cows.

• Estrogen must induce upfront ovulation in anestrous cows.

• Estrogen must induce ovulation after PGF.

• Estrogen must not produce “hyper-estrus” activity to prevent injury of cows caused by excessive riding and standing behavior.

• Estrogen must be easy to administer.

Page 14: Using Estradiol Cypionate (ECP®) vs. GnRH in Controlled A.I.-Breeding Programs Jeffrey S. Stevenson, Ph.D. Kansas State University

• Upfront EB (1 vs. 2 mg) at CIDR-7 insertion was effective for lactating cycling cows (Day et al., 2000).

• Upfront EB vs. GnRH at PRID-8 insertion was effective in cycling replacement heifers (Lane et al., 2001).

Upfront Follicular Control?: CyclingUpfront Follicular Control?: Cycling

020406080

100

EB+PRID-8 GnRH+PRID-8

% in estrus % in estrus by 72 h

First-service conception rate, %

Page 15: Using Estradiol Cypionate (ECP®) vs. GnRH in Controlled A.I.-Breeding Programs Jeffrey S. Stevenson, Ph.D. Kansas State University

Upfront Follicular Control?: AnestrusUpfront Follicular Control?: Anestrus

• Use of EB at 0.5 or 1.0 mg dose at the time of CIDR insertion did not induce ovulation effectively in seasonally anestrous dairy cattle (Verkerk et al., 1998). Beef cattle?

• EB + CIDR reduced formation of persistent follicles in lactating anestrous dairy cows, but delayed follicular development in some anestrous cows (Rhodes et al., 2002). Beef cattle?

• Immature dominant follicles in suckled anestrous cows were less likely to ovulate after EB (Burke et al., 2001).

Page 16: Using Estradiol Cypionate (ECP®) vs. GnRH in Controlled A.I.-Breeding Programs Jeffrey S. Stevenson, Ph.D. Kansas State University

After luteolysis, ECP induces ovulation in lactating dairy After luteolysis, ECP induces ovulation in lactating dairy cows and in replacement heifers (Lopes et al., 2000).cows and in replacement heifers (Lopes et al., 2000).

Ovulation after PGF-induced Luteolysis?Ovulation after PGF-induced Luteolysis?

Response

Kansas

Florida

Onset of estrus after ECP, h 27.8 ± 3.2 29.0 ± 1.8Duration of estrus, h 6.9 ± 0.7 12.5 ± 1.8No. of standing events 17.1 ± 5.2 20.3 ± 2.8Total standing timed, sec 36.3 ± 12 47.6 ± 7.5

Ovulation after ECP, h 60.0 ± 1.8 55.4 ± 2.7Ovulation after estrus onset, h 29.9 ± 2.4 27.5 ± 1.1

ECP to LH surge, h 19.1 ± 2.6

Page 17: Using Estradiol Cypionate (ECP®) vs. GnRH in Controlled A.I.-Breeding Programs Jeffrey S. Stevenson, Ph.D. Kansas State University

Easily Administered?Easily Administered?

• ECP is dosed at 2 mg per mL.• A small syringe is required to

deliver 1 mg of ECP i.m. in a volume of 0.5 mL (0.5 cc).

• When injecting cows, follow Beef Quality Assurance (BQA) guidelines to reduce carcass bruising and injection site lesions (i.e., use neck injection sites).

Page 18: Using Estradiol Cypionate (ECP®) vs. GnRH in Controlled A.I.-Breeding Programs Jeffrey S. Stevenson, Ph.D. Kansas State University

EAZI-BREED CIDR® Cattle InsertEAZI-BREED CIDR® Cattle Insert

Page 19: Using Estradiol Cypionate (ECP®) vs. GnRH in Controlled A.I.-Breeding Programs Jeffrey S. Stevenson, Ph.D. Kansas State University

PGF TAI

0 +24 +48 Days

Hours

–7

CIDR

1 mg EB (cows)0.5 mg EB (heifers)

0, 1, or 2 mg EB

Use of EB Use of EB + CIDR+ CIDR

0 mg

Parity 1

2 mg

1 mg

EB dose

64% (73)28% (37)

51% (69)41% (34)

63% (72)32% (36)

Parity 2+Heifers

43% (56)

51% (54)

48% (56)

Courtesy of Les Anderson, Univ. of Kentucky

Pregnancy rates

Page 20: Using Estradiol Cypionate (ECP®) vs. GnRH in Controlled A.I.-Breeding Programs Jeffrey S. Stevenson, Ph.D. Kansas State University

PGF EB

–7 0

24

60

Days

Hours

CIDREB+CIDR7+EB+AIE

PGF

CIDRCIDR7+EB+AIE EB AI @

estrus

EB AI @ estrus

PGF EB

CIDREB+CIDR7+EB+TAI60

PGF

CIDRCIDR7+EB+TAI60 EB

EB

TAI

TAI

PGF EB

CIDREB+CIDR7+TAI48+G

CIDRCIDR7+TAI48TAI

TAI+ GnRH

48

39% (80)

58% (69)

36% (77)

51% (87)

38% (80)

53% (85)

PGF

PR Courtesy of Joel Yelich, Univ. of Florida

Page 21: Using Estradiol Cypionate (ECP®) vs. GnRH in Controlled A.I.-Breeding Programs Jeffrey S. Stevenson, Ph.D. Kansas State University

PGF

0.5 mg

ECP

PGF GnRH

GnRH

PGF

GnRH +TAI

TAI

TAI

–7 0 +24 +52-60

Days Hours

–9

CIDR

CIDRG+CIDR-7+G

G+CIDR-7+ECP

ECP+CIDR-9+ECP CIDR

1 mg ECP

1 mg ECP

Use of ECP + CIDRUse of ECP + CIDRcourtesy of

When using ECP upfront, the CIDR must be in place for 9 days

Page 22: Using Estradiol Cypionate (ECP®) vs. GnRH in Controlled A.I.-Breeding Programs Jeffrey S. Stevenson, Ph.D. Kansas State University

G + CIDR-7 + G

Parity 1

ECP + CIDR-9 + ECP

G + CIDR-7 + ECP

Treatment* Parity 2+

56% (45) 52% (63)

61% (44) 72% (60)

44% (43) 52% (62)

Total

54% (108)

67% (104)

51% (105)

Pregnancy Rates in Suckled Angus Cows

courtesy of

*TAI at 52 to 60 hr

Page 23: Using Estradiol Cypionate (ECP®) vs. GnRH in Controlled A.I.-Breeding Programs Jeffrey S. Stevenson, Ph.D. Kansas State University

Pregnancy Rates in AngusReplacement Heifers

G + CIDR7 + G

Herd B

ECP + CIDR9 + ECP

G + CIDR7 + ECP

Treatment Herd K

50% (24) 31% (98)

33% (25) 39% (99)

38% (26) 39% (109)

Total

34% (122)

38% (124)

39% (135)

courtesy of

G + CIDR-7 + G

Herd B

ECP + CIDR-9 + ECP

G + CIDR-7 + ECP

Treatment* Herd K

50% (24) 31% (98)

33% (25) 39% (99)

38% (26) 39% (109)

Total

34% (122)

38% (124)

39% (135)

Pregnancy Rates in Angus Pregnancy Rates in Angus Replacement HeifersReplacement Heifers

courtesy of

*TAI at 52 to 60 hr

Page 24: Using Estradiol Cypionate (ECP®) vs. GnRH in Controlled A.I.-Breeding Programs Jeffrey S. Stevenson, Ph.D. Kansas State University

PGF

MGA (0.5 mg/d)

MGA (0.5 mg/d)

MGA (0.5 mg/d)

MGA (0.5 mg/d)

ECP

ECP

PGF GnRH

GnRH

GnRH

GnRH

PGF

PGF

GnRH +TAI

TAI

TAI

–32 –7 –19 0 +24 +72

GnRH +TAI

Days Hours

Calf removal

Calf removal

Page 25: Using Estradiol Cypionate (ECP®) vs. GnRH in Controlled A.I.-Breeding Programs Jeffrey S. Stevenson, Ph.D. Kansas State University

ECP vs. GnRHECP vs. GnRH

Total

No

Yes

Calf removal

49% (94)

ECP

51% (90)

50%+ (184)

GnRH

38% (88)

51% (97)

44% (185)

Total

44% (178)

50%* (191)

47% (369)

*Different (P<0.05) from no calf removal.+Different (P<0.05) from GnRH.

Page 26: Using Estradiol Cypionate (ECP®) vs. GnRH in Controlled A.I.-Breeding Programs Jeffrey S. Stevenson, Ph.D. Kansas State University

SummarySummary

• ECP is an alternative to GnRH for upfront follicle control, but may not be as effective as GnRH for anestrous cows.

• If ECP is used upfront at CIDR insertion, the CIDR must be in place for 9 days, rather than 7 days when using GnRH.

• After CIDR removal, ECP is an alternative to GnRH after luteolysis for TAI systems.

• Pregnancy rates to TAI tended to be greater in suckled cows when treated after PGF with ECP than GnRH.

Page 27: Using Estradiol Cypionate (ECP®) vs. GnRH in Controlled A.I.-Breeding Programs Jeffrey S. Stevenson, Ph.D. Kansas State University

Resynchronization of EstrusResynchronization of Estrus

• Increase opportunity for more A.I.-sired calves

• Take full advantage of previous synchrony with little additional cost

• Facilitate heat detection of first eligible heat after A.I.

Page 28: Using Estradiol Cypionate (ECP®) vs. GnRH in Controlled A.I.-Breeding Programs Jeffrey S. Stevenson, Ph.D. Kansas State University

Protocols for Protocols for Resynchronization of EstrusResynchronization of Estrus

• Previously used progestin-releasing inserts or implants

• Feeding of a progestin (e.g., MGA)

• Combination progestins with estrogen injections

• Use of Ovsynch and Heatsynch

Page 29: Using Estradiol Cypionate (ECP®) vs. GnRH in Controlled A.I.-Breeding Programs Jeffrey S. Stevenson, Ph.D. Kansas State University

CIDR

ECP

CIDR

13 20

Control

Days after initial AI

Detection of estrus and AI

ECP

Exp. 1:

68 dairy heifers

62 beef heifers

(11-15)

Page 30: Using Estradiol Cypionate (ECP®) vs. GnRH in Controlled A.I.-Breeding Programs Jeffrey S. Stevenson, Ph.D. Kansas State University

ECP

Stevenson et al. 2003. J. Anim. Sci. In press.

Page 31: Using Estradiol Cypionate (ECP®) vs. GnRH in Controlled A.I.-Breeding Programs Jeffrey S. Stevenson, Ph.D. Kansas State University

Exp. 1. Reproductive TraitsExp. 1. Reproductive Traits

Item Con CIDRCIDR+ ECP

No. of heifers 44 42 44

PR after 1st A.I. 53% 47% 60%

Return 18-26 days 73% 84% 90%

CR of repeat A.I. 60% 33% 35%

26-day PR 72% 60% 73%

Stevenson et al. 2003. J. Anim. Sci. In press.

Page 32: Using Estradiol Cypionate (ECP®) vs. GnRH in Controlled A.I.-Breeding Programs Jeffrey S. Stevenson, Ph.D. Kansas State University

CIDR

ECP

CIDR

13 20

Control

Days after initial TAI

Detection of estrus and AI

ECP

Exp. 3:

588 suckled beef cows

EB EB

Page 33: Using Estradiol Cypionate (ECP®) vs. GnRH in Controlled A.I.-Breeding Programs Jeffrey S. Stevenson, Ph.D. Kansas State University

0

20

40

60

80

-1 0 1 2 3Days from CIDR removal

Control CIDR+EB CIDR+ECP

% EB or ECP

Stevenson et al. 2003. J. Anim. Sci. In press.

Page 34: Using Estradiol Cypionate (ECP®) vs. GnRH in Controlled A.I.-Breeding Programs Jeffrey S. Stevenson, Ph.D. Kansas State University

Exp. 2. Reproductive TraitsExp. 2. Reproductive Traits

Item ConCIDR+ EB

CIDR+ ECP

No. of cows 292 151 145

PR after 1st A.I. 52% 44% 52%

Return 20-23 days 29% 84% 65%

CR of repeat A.I. 65% 52% 65%

Stevenson et al. 2003. J. Anim. Sci. In press.

Page 35: Using Estradiol Cypionate (ECP®) vs. GnRH in Controlled A.I.-Breeding Programs Jeffrey S. Stevenson, Ph.D. Kansas State University

SummarySummary

Resynchronization of repeat estrus:• Had no negative effect on established

pregnancies.• Increased synchrony of repeat estrus.• Tended to reduce resynchronized conception

rates after resynchronization in dairy and beef heifers .

• Produced normal conception rates at the resynchronized estrus in suckled beef cows when ECP + CIDR were used.

Page 36: Using Estradiol Cypionate (ECP®) vs. GnRH in Controlled A.I.-Breeding Programs Jeffrey S. Stevenson, Ph.D. Kansas State University

Thanks to the following for their Thanks to the following for their financial or product support:financial or product support:

• Select SiresSelect Sires

• Pharmacia Animal Health

• Fort Dodge Animal Health

• Intervet

• Merial

Page 37: Using Estradiol Cypionate (ECP®) vs. GnRH in Controlled A.I.-Breeding Programs Jeffrey S. Stevenson, Ph.D. Kansas State University

The endThe end