Upload
shen
View
26
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Using DSP to Improve the Performance of a Doherty Amplifier. Yu Zhao, Masaya Iwamoto, Larry Larson and Peter Asbeck. High Speed Device&Circuit Group. Introduction. To reduce DC power consumption in wireless communication Increase overall efficiency of RF PA Use Doherty structure - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
Using DSP
to Improve the Performance
of a Doherty Amplifier
Yu Zhao, Masaya Iwamoto, Larry Larson and Peter Asbeck
High Speed Device&Circuit Group
04/21/23
High Speed Device&Circuit Group
Introduction
To reduce DC power consumption in wireless communication» Increase overall efficiency of RF PA
Use Doherty structure
To maintain performance of transmitter» Achieve adequate linearity ( for CDMA and
OFDM)
Use DSP to control Doherty Amplifier
04/21/23
High Speed Device&Circuit Group
Extended Doherty amplifier
» architecture» measured results without DSP
Simulated application of DSP to Doherty amplifier
» control strategy» behavioral model» simulation result
Conclusions
Agenda
04/21/23
High Speed Device&Circuit Group
Low power range» only Main-PA operates» Reff = RL
High power range» Main-PA goes into saturation,
Aux-PA turns on
» Reff = RL
Extended Doherty uses » Achieves wider high efficiency
range
Reff
Zc=RL
/4
Main PA
Auxiliary PA RL
Zo
/4
Pin Pout
Advantages of Doherty Architecture
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1
Pout (normalized)
Eff
icie
ncy
10dB output back-off
Extended Doherty (=4)
Classical Doherty (=2)
Class B
Class A
04/21/23
High Speed Device&Circuit Group
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
Pout (dBm)G
ain
(d
B)
-100
-90
-80
-70
-60
-50
-40
-30
-20
-10
0
AC
PR
1, A
CP
R2
(dB
c)
Doherty
Main Only
Gain
ACPR1
ACPR2
Circuit shows good efficiency over wide power range
Experimental Results --- Gain,Efficiency&ACPR
GCS InGaP/GaAs HBT
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
-10 -5 0 5 10 15 20 25 30
Pout (dBm)
PAE
Gain
Drain efficiency
ACPR is still a concern
04/21/23
High Speed Device&Circuit Group
ACPR1=-46 to -48 dBc (3:1 VSWR)PAE=10 to 15% (3:1 VSWR)
center=50.00+0.00j
10.0
12.5
46
UCSD_P16_V4.0_F950.bin
PAE=+14.2% ACP1=+47.2dB ACP2=+62.6dB Load:69.00+15.00j PAE=+13.2% Gain=+7.0dB ACP1=+47.8dB ACP2=+63.4dB
Pout=16dBm
ACPR1=-38 to -58 dBc (3:1 VSWR)PAE=12 to 35% (3:1 VSWR)
ACPR1PAE
Pout=25dBm
center=50.00+0.00j
12.515.017.520.025.0
30.0
35.0
3840
4244
4648
5052
54
5658
UCSD_P25_V4.0_F950.bin
PAE=+33.0% ACP1=+46.9dB ACP2=+55.6dB Load:69.00+15.00j PAE=+35.1% Gain=+8.1dB ACP1=+51.4dB ACP2=+55.1dB
Experimental Results --- Load-Pull
Measurements taken at Conexant Systems Inc.
04/21/23
High Speed Device&Circuit Group
Relative input of Main & Aux amplifier- A2/A1, Φ2-Φ1 » Maintain magnitude&phase balance
Bias point of Auxiliary amplifier – Vgg2» Maintain magnitude&phase balance and good efficiency
Eliminate additional phase shifter
Design Issues where DSP Can Help
Vgg2
DSP
I
I
Q
Q
Pre_amp
Main
/4
Auxiliary
Input
match
Input
matchA2, Φ2
A1, Φ1 Zc=RL
/4Φ2-Φ1
04/21/23
High Speed Device&Circuit Group
-2
-1.5
-1
-0.5
0
0.5
1
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
-20
-15
-10
-5
0
5
10
0 5 10 15 20 25 30Pout (dBm)
Sweep Φ2 - Φ1
A2/A1 = 1.5 constant
Bias = - 4.0 V constant
Normalized Phase
Normalized Gain
Simulation Results --- Phase Difference Φ1, Φ2
/4Main PA
Auxiliary PA
RF_signal1
RF_signal2
A1, Φ1
A2, Φ2
Ph
as
e D
isto
rtio
n(d
eg
ree
)
Ga
in D
isto
rtio
n(d
B)
Pout (dBm)
04/21/23
High Speed Device&Circuit Group
Design Issues where DSP Can Help
Relative input of Main & Aux amplifier- A2/A1, Φ2-Φ1 » Maintain magnitude&phase balance
Bias point of Auxiliary amplifier – Vgg2» Maintain magnitude&phase balance and good efficiency
Eliminate additional phase shifter
Vgg2
DSP
I
I
Q
Q
Pre_amp
Main
/4
Auxiliary
Input
match
Input
matchA2, Φ2
A1, Φ1 Zc=RL
/4A2/A1
04/21/23
High Speed Device&Circuit Group
-2
-1.5
-1
-0.5
0
0.5
1
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
Pout (dBm)
Ga
in D
isto
rtio
n(d
B)
Set A1=1,Sweep A2 Φ2 - Φ1 = 90° constant
Bias = - 4.0 V constant
/4Main PA
Auxiliary PA
RF_signal1
RF_signal2
A1, Φ1
-8
-6
-4
-2
0
2
4
6
8
10
0 5 10 15 20 25 30Pout (dBm)
Ph
as
e D
isto
rtio
n(d
eg
ree
)
Normalized Phase
Normalized Gain
Simulation Results --- Power Split Ratio A1, A2
A2, Φ2
04/21/23
High Speed Device&Circuit Group
Design Issues where DSP Can Help
Relative input of Main & Aux amplifier- A2/A1, Φ2 - Φ1 » Maintain magnitude&phase balance
Bias point of Auxiliary amplifier – Vgg2» Maintain magnitude&phase balance and good efficiency
Eliminate additional phase shifter
Vgg2
DSP
I
I
Q
Q
Pre_amp
Main
/4
Auxiliary
Input
match
Input
matchA2, Φ2
A1, Φ1 Zc=RL
/4
04/21/23
High Speed Device&Circuit Group
Simulation Results --- Different Bias
change bias of Aux-PA
A2/A1 = 1.5 constant
Φ2 - Φ1 = 90° constant 0
10
20
30
40
50
60
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
Dra
in E
ffic
ien
cy
(%
)
Pout (dBm)
-6
-4
-2
0
2
4
6
8
10
0 5 10 15 20 25 30Pout (dBm)
Normalized Phase
Ph
as
e D
isto
rtio
n(d
eg
ree
)
-2
-1.5
-1
-0.5
0
0.5
1
0 5 10 15 20 25 30Pout (dBm)
Normalized Gain
Ga
in D
isto
rtio
n(d
B)
04/21/23
High Speed Device&Circuit Group
DSP Control Strategy
Given input signal &desired Pout, choose optimum Vgg2, A2/A1 and Φ2(t)-Φ1(t) to maintain relatively constant gain, phase with maximum efficiency
Signal
splitter
a1(t)/a2(t)
Base band X(t)
Power level
X1(t) --- to Main PA
Look-up-table
θ2(t)-θ1(t)
X2(t) --- to Aux PA
Bias of Aux PA
DSP Block
04/21/23
High Speed Device&Circuit Group
77.5
88.5
99.510
10.511
11.512
0 5 10 15 20
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
10 15 20 25 30
Pin (dBm)Pin (dBm)
Normalized Phase
Gain
DSP Control Algorithm ---Based on simulation data
When Pin < 10 dBm Choose: A1/A2=1.5
Φ2-Φ1 = 100° Vgg2 = - 4.4 V
When 10 < Pin < 15 dBm Change Vgg2 (-3.8 to -3.92 V)
Dra
in E
ffic
ien
cy
(%
)
Pout (dBm)
Ph
as
e D
isto
rtio
n(d
eg
ree
)
Ga
in D
isto
rtio
n(d
B)
Vgg2
Vgg2
Vgg2
-6
-4
-2
0
2
4
6
0 5 10 15 20
04/21/23
High Speed Device&Circuit Group
-4
-2
0
2
4
6
8
0 5 10 15 20
7
7.58
8.59
9.5
1010.5
1111.5
12
0 5 10 15 20
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
10 15 20 25 30
Pin (dBm)Pin (dBm)
Normalized Phase
Gain
Dra
in E
ffic
ien
cy
(%
)
Pout (dBm)
Ph
as
e D
isto
rtio
n(d
eg
ree
)
Ga
in D
isto
rtio
n(d
B)
Vgg2
Vgg2
Vgg2
When 15 < Pin < 18 dBm Choose: A1/A2=1.5 Φ2 - Φ1 = 90° Vgg2 = - 3.80 V
DSP Control Algorithm ---Based on simulation data
04/21/23
High Speed Device&Circuit Group
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
5 10 15 20 25-5
0
5
10
15
20
5 10 15 20 25
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
10 15 20 25 30
Pin (dBm)Pin (dBm)
Normalized Phase
GainD
rain
Eff
icie
nc
y (
% )
Pout (dBm)
Ph
as
e D
isto
rtio
n(d
eg
ree
)
Ga
in D
isto
rtio
n(d
B)
Vgg2
Vgg2
Vgg2
When Pin > 18 dBm Choose: A1/A2=1.5 Φ2 - Φ1 = 85° Vgg2 = - 3.92 V
DSP Control Algorithm ---Based on simulation data
04/21/23
High Speed Device&Circuit Group
-5
0
5
10
15
-10 -5 0 5 10 15 20 25
0
5
10
15
-10 -5 0 5 10 15 20 25
Simulated Amplifier with DSP Control
PA’s behavioral model with DSP control (Blue)
and the “best” without DSP control (Red) (choose A2/A1 = 1.5,Φ2 - Φ1 = 90°,Vgg2= -3.44V)
Pin (dBm)Pin (dBm)
Ph
as
e D
isto
rtio
n(d
eg
ree
)
Ga
in D
isto
rtio
n(d
B)
Normalized PhaseGain
04/21/23
High Speed Device&Circuit Group
-2 -1.5 -1 -0.5 0 0.5 1 1.5 2
frequency (MHz)
-70
-60
-50
-40
-30
-20
-10
0
10 15 20 25 30
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Simulation Results --- ACPR&Efficiency
ACPR (dBc) Efficiency(%)
Pout (dBm)
Blue,with DSP
Red,without DSP
Use matlab to compute spectrum of CDMA signal
04/21/23
High Speed Device&Circuit Group
Conclusions
Extended Doherty amplifier can achieve high efficiency over wide output power range
PA Simulation based on behavior model shows CDMA ACPR specification can be met with DSP optimization
We believe DSP can make circuit design easier and improve performance significantly