5
Use of manipulative devices in teaching mathematics Author(s): ALLEN L. BERNSTEIN Source: The Arithmetic Teacher, Vol. 10, No. 5 (May 1963), pp. 280-283 Published by: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/41186770 . Accessed: 12/06/2014 21:05 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp . JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. . National Council of Teachers of Mathematics is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to The Arithmetic Teacher. http://www.jstor.org This content downloaded from 195.34.79.49 on Thu, 12 Jun 2014 21:05:32 PM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

Use of manipulative devices in teaching mathematics

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Use of manipulative devices in teaching mathematicsAuthor(s): ALLEN L. BERNSTEINSource: The Arithmetic Teacher, Vol. 10, No. 5 (May 1963), pp. 280-283Published by: National Council of Teachers of MathematicsStable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/41186770 .

Accessed: 12/06/2014 21:05

Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at .http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp

.JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range ofcontent in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new formsof scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected].

.

National Council of Teachers of Mathematics is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extendaccess to The Arithmetic Teacher.

http://www.jstor.org

This content downloaded from 195.34.79.49 on Thu, 12 Jun 2014 21:05:32 PMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

Use of manipulative devices in teaching mathematics

ALLEN L. BERNSTEIN Wayne County Public Schools, Detroit, Michigan Mr. Bernstein is consultant in secondary education for the Wayne County Public Schools.

JLhe use of manipulative and pictorial material in the teaching of mathematics has been an accepted procedure for many years. The modern teacher is surrounded with methods books discussing how to make these devices, and with commercial catalogs offering a tremendous variety of these materials. How does one navigate this maze and make wise decisions con- cerning the expenditure of professional time and energy and of school funds? We believe that from the experience of the profession certain principles regarding the selection and use of such material have evolved.

There should be a direct correlation be- tween the operations which are carried on with a device and the operations which are carried on in doing the same mathematics with paper and pencil.

For example, consider the sketch of the abacus shown in Figure 1, illustrating the

!.. » ц » .. I

* * '. < ' i

!" (¡ (3 ?

¡: " : Ü § i " • i i j С i" q Y г ' ■ V

II I I ¿ 8 11 Figure 1

sum of 23 and 34. Note that the effect in the columns of the abacus correlates directly with the effect in addition with the symbols representing the numbers under consideration.

Now consider the sketch (Fig. 2) and the accompanying example (Fig. 3). In this example we are showing 17 plus 74. Note that in the sum of the first column it is necessary to "carry" because the sum is greater than 10. The operation as shown on the abacus is precisely the same as that shown by paper and pencil, that of ex- changing ten beads in the ones column for one in the tens column. By contrast one version of the ancient Chinese abacus calls for five beads in each column, each with a value of one, and two beads above a divider, each with a value of five. The sketches (Figs. 4 and 5) illustrate the same example, 17 plus 74, added on such

■и u u ü o i.1 1 " i" У '

r '■ V

§ Ö ÓV-.--TEN 7 4 T P I О О'^Г д. I 7

T|g?/ 8 II

I I SUM 8 II

Figure 2

280 The Arithmetic Teacher

This content downloaded from 195.34.79.49 on Thu, 12 Jun 2014 21:05:32 PMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

'и о о о ц il1

[~'one|

" "

+ 74 17 TEN (5 + 17

I i 91 II III 8 ó 11 I I

SUM 9 I

Figure 3

an abacus. The lack of relationship be- tween the abacus operation and the paper and pencil operation will lead to confusion.

The use of the manipulative aid should involve some moving part or parts, or should be something which is moved in the process of illustrating the mathematical principles involved.

The grouping of objects in the early grades with the use of bottle caps, tongue depressors, or the myriad other innova- tions which have assisted teachers in the past, or the use of the same materials in the intermediate grades to act as symbolic representations of the elements of word problems (i.e., 4 bottle caps represents 4

Г " ~1

ПУП I § I

t 8 8 8 I 8 я я 8 n я II

Г i SUM 9 I

(5+. 4)

Figure 4. To add 4 in the ones column, it is necessary to deduct one and add a bead representing 5.

cans of soup), would be excellent illustra- tions of this principle. The child then has the opportunity to move these items around on his desk, and the motion effect helps to make the problem more concrete than a simple pictorial representation of the example. The current emphasis on and discussion of discovery methods in teaching reveals another facet of this important principle. The availability of manipulative objects in less structured learning situations gives the child the opportunity to explore relationships and discover principles by manipulating the parts of the aid. Mathematics teachers often help students to discover that the same problem can be approached and solved in a variety of ways. When this is true of an example most of the different approaches can be illustrated with varying manipulations of the appropriate aid.

The use of manipulative and pictorial materials should exploit as many senses as possible.

We know that human beings learn through all the senses and that among the most important of these in the learning process are the visual, aural, tactual, and kinesthetic senses. We believe that the kinesthetic and tactual senses in particular are too often ignored in current practice. When a first-grade child uses an abacus, counting frame, or other similar aid to solve a problem, he is often observed moving his fingers over the beads or

I,, n u u ■ ,,l

I T T j i i

II tilg I Figure 5. Two beads representing five ones apiece are exchanged for one ten bead.

May 1963 281

This content downloaded from 195.34.79.49 on Thu, 12 Jun 2014 21:05:32 PMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

touching the objects as he counts them. This is an important part of the learning process. It is therefore desirable that in the use of such materials the teacher have enough available so that all the children have an opportunity to handle and manip- ulate it. It is also desirable that the ma- terials be made in bright colors, with con- trasting colors to stimulate the visual sense where appropriate. There is some danger of color dependency, which is to be avoided.

A student should have his own aid, or ample opportunity to use one many times.

Consider the situation where the teacher demonstrates a principle with a manipula- tive device, goes through the explanation possibly a second time, and then assigns the children a series of seat- work problems all of which are done with paper, pencil, and symbolic representations only. Con- trast this situation with one in which each child has the opportunity to handle an aid and use it as he does his seat work. In such a situation, the child may manipulate the aid for many dozens, even hundreds, of examples so that the principle illustrated just once by the teacher becomes increas- ingly clear in the child's mind.

In general, learning may proceed from using physical models, to using pictures, to using only symbols.

Let us consider the example of three cans of soup, under the following headings:

Physical model Picture Symbol 3 actual cans A photograph The printed

of soup of 3 cans words, "three of soup cans of soup"

or 3 empty or A sehe- or "3 cans of soup cans matic dia- soup"

gram, viz.,

or 3 cylinders or "3s"

The use of the physical or manipulative aid should be permissive for the child rather than mandatory.

Some children are able, after brief study, to operate on "an abstract level/' and forced use of multisensory aid in their

mathematical work will only slow them down and may create bordom or resent- ment. On the other hand, denying such chil- dren the availability of the aid because they do not need it defeats opportunity for exploration and discovery of the new pat- terns mentioned above. Other children may need to use the concrete assistance rendered by the aid for a period of time longer than one would expect for the so- called "average" child. Teaching experi- ence has indicated that students tend to give up the use of manipulative devices when they no longer need them.

A device should be flexible and have many uses.

The hundred board is a case in point. This familiar device has been used in many classrooms to illustrate some features of number structure for our number system with base ten. When some parts of the board are covered it may be used to illus- trate number systems to other bases. The board has also been used to illustrate some of the principles involved in decimal and percent calculations. Cost is always a major factor in the choice of devices. (Our definition of cost includes the time that teachers and children may put into con- structing home-made devices.) Therefore the finished aid should be convenient to use and store, and should be fairly durable. Obviously such materials as are consumed in use are not included in this principle.

The principles elicited indicate that manipulative devices need not be compli- cated, and apply in a variety of teaching formats, i.e., large group or small group instruction, individual work, prescribed exercises, cooperatively planned projects, independent discovery work, and so forth. Students may be involved in producing the aid, or gathering material for it. The teacher must decide whether the invest- ment of such time or energy is worthwhile relative to the gains achieved in terms of carefully chosen goals.

While it is obviously impossible to ap- ply all of these criteria to all possible teach- ing aids in all situations, they do provide

282 The Arithmetic Teacher

This content downloaded from 195.34.79.49 on Thu, 12 Jun 2014 21:05:32 PMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

some sensible guide lines enabling teachers to decide which materials are worthy of the investment of professional energy and

school financial resources. It is hoped that these criteria will be helpful in the profes- sional decisions facing us in this area.

Multiplication tables and dominoes Uominoes are useful in teaching mathe- matics. For the beginner they provide sets of dots which can be matched one-to-one. Such matching is preliminary to rational counting. And if the dominoes are colored then the youngster begins to learn colors as well. The grouping of dots on the dominoes helps him to recognize the vari- ous subgroups of a given number.

The game of dominoes is played as follows: Each youngster draws a "hand" of seven from the entire collection of dominoes placed face down on the table. The player whose hand contains the high- est double places this domino face up on the playing surface. Other players in order then play to it by matching it with one of theirs. When a player is unable to match one end of one of his dominoes to an open end of one of the dominoes which has been played, he draws from the, stock left un- turned. The first player to play all of his dominoes wins.

A more complicated version of the game involves the addition and multiplication facts. In this domino game the same rules as given above are followed but a score is kept. A player scores points when the sum of the pips on the exposed ends of the played dominoes is a multiple of five. The figure shows the board after Player A has just played the one-four domino. He scores 15 points. If Player В then plays domino one-six his score will be 20 points. If the sum is not a multiple of five then no points are scored.

This version of the game gives the youngster practice in adding and practice on the 5's multiplication table. But there

• ••••• •# • ••••• ••

is no reason why the game can not be further revised to give the youngster prac- tice on other tables as well. For example, a player might score points only when the sum equalled a multiple of three or four or six or eight, or whatever other table needed to be drilled upon. This is not only a drill activity to fix certain facts, but it is also a preparatory activity. That is, the teacher might post a list of numbers which are multiples of seven. If the domino game were played with only these numbers to be used in scoring, then the youngsters would learn the multiples of seven. Later they would begin to realize that these multiples constitute the 7's table.

Get out the dominoes for a good rainy day mathematics activity! - Joseph Ken- nedy, Indiana State College, Terre Haute, Indiana) Violet Blume, Crestwoôd School, Paris, Illinois.

May 196S 283

This content downloaded from 195.34.79.49 on Thu, 12 Jun 2014 21:05:32 PMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions