Upload
miyoko
View
42
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Use of administrative registers in census 2011. Estonian experience Ene-Margit Tiit , prof emer . Statistics Estonia , University of Tartu. Content. Usage of registers during the census 2011 Usage of registers for assessing the real population size and coverage rate. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
Use of administrative registers in census 2011. Estonian experience
Ene-Margit Tiit, prof emer. Statistics Estonia, University of Tartu
Presentatsiooni pealkiri või esitaja nimi
Content
Usage of registers during the census 2011 Usage of registers for assessing the real
population size and coverage rate
01.01.2006
Presentatsiooni pealkiri või esitaja nimi
USAGE OF REGISTERS DURING THE CENSUS
01.01.2006
Presentatsiooni pealkiri või esitaja nimi
Methodology of census2011 in EstoniaThe methodology of the census 2011 in Estonia was a combination of using administrative registers, self-enumeration by internet and face-to-face interviews. In general, this methodology justified our hopes, so that about 65% of population enumerated themselves using internet and in general, the quality of the data was high. But this method also caused some undercoverage. In the case when a people marked by internet a wrong address, then the enumerator did not visit this address during the field work.
01.01.2006
Presentatsiooni pealkiri või esitaja nimi
E-enumeration rate
01.01.2006
Presentatsiooni pealkiri või esitaja nimi
Administrative registers were used in different steps of the census: Population register and buildings’ register were used
in preparation of working lists for enumerators; Population register and register of census data from
2000 were used to pre-fill the census questionnaires; The data about current studying were taken from the
information basis of education; The registers listed, but also some other sources
will be used for imputation missing values in the census data-base.
01.01.2006
Presentatsiooni pealkiri või esitaja nimi
USAGE OF REGISTERS FOR ASSESSING THE REAL POPULATION SIZE AND COVERAGE RATE
01.01.2006
Presentatsiooni pealkiri või esitaja nimi
It is well-known fact that nowadays due high mobility of the population the undercoverage of the census is a serious problem. The situation is more complicated when the combined methodology is used.
To assess the coverage rate the real population size must be assessed, using some exterior data resources.
From this fact follows the second task where the registers will be used. It is
estimation of the amount of non-enumerated people, calculation of population size assessing the number of illegal emigrants between two
censuses estimating the coverage rate of the census.
01.01.2006
Presentatsiooni pealkiri või esitaja nimi
With this aim we will use about 10 different registers that form an unified system in Estonia where all persons are identified using ID-codes.
The population register that is the central register and has been created about 20 years ago, contains about 4% more persons than the number of persons enumerated by census.
Some of these people do not live in Estonia any more, as they are illegally (without registration) emigrated.
Another part of these people live still in Estonia, but they were by different reasons not enumerated.
01.01.2006
Presentatsiooni pealkiri või esitaja nimi
People in Population Register form the set P and the set of enumerated people is E.
It is necessary to divide the set P—E into two parts:A – residentsB – non-residents (emigrated)#A – number of people in A
Then the real poplation size is N = #E+#A
and the coverage rate is #E/N
01.01.2006
Population Register
B
A
Enumerated
Presentatsiooni pealkiri või esitaja nimi
We assumed that people living in Estonia (being residents), are active in the sense of some register
they get salary (and pay taxes), they study, they have health insurance, they get pension or some social support etc.
When we studied the coverage of the population by registers, we ascertained that in average each resident of Estonia has some record during a year in average in three registers. In the opposite, the non-residents have records in much less registers.
01.01.2006
Presentatsiooni pealkiri või esitaja nimi
Residents and non-residents. Coverage by registers depending on age
01.01.2006
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100.0000
.5000
1.0000
1.5000
2.0000
2.5000
3.0000
3.5000
4.0000
residents
non-residents
Presentatsiooni pealkiri või esitaja nimi
Using different combinations of registers for different age-groups we succeeded to elaborate the algorithm for differentiation the and non-residents having quite high Odds Ratio
OR = (p1/q1)/(p2/q2),40<OR<240
p1 is the probability that the person belongs to residents, p2 – to non-residents and q=1-p.The differentiation is most problematic for men of age-group 20—40, as they form the most mobile group of population
01.01.2006
Presentatsiooni pealkiri või esitaja nimi01.01.2006
Thank you!