-
8/9/2019 USCA DCC 14-5325 Statement of Related Cases
1/4
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT
JOSEPH ARPAIO,
Appellant-Plaintiff,
v.
BARACK OBAMA, ET AL.
Appellees-Defendants.
Case No. on Appeal: 14-5325
Appeal from U.S. District Court
Case No. 1:14-cv-01966 (BAH)
APPELLANTS CERTIFICATE AS TO
PARTIES, RULINGS, AND RELATED CASES
Plaintiff-Appellant Sheriff Joseph M. Arpaio hereby certifies
pursuant to
Circuit Rule 28(a)(1) that:
A. Parties and Amici
The parties that appeared in the District Court for the District
of Columbia
(District Court) are Plaintiff-Appellant Joseph M. Arpaio,
elected Sheriff of
Maricopa County, Arizona (Sheriff Arpaio).
Defendants-Appellees (1) Mr. Barack Hussein Obama, President of
the
United States of America (President Obama), (2) Mr. Jeh Johnson,
Secretary of
USCA Case #14-5325 Document #1534669 Filed: 01/28/2015 Page 1 of
4
-
8/9/2019 USCA DCC 14-5325 Statement of Related Cases
2/4
the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS), and (3) Mr. Leon
Rodriguez,
Director of U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services
(USCIS).
No Amici Curiae participated at the District Court for D.C.
level.
B. Rulings Under Review
The rulings under review are the Honorable Judge Beryl Howells
(Judge
Howell) December 23, 2014 Memorandum Opinion and (Final) Order
in the
District Court for D.C. granting Defendants' motion to dismiss
for lack of standing
under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (FRCP) Rule 12(b)(1),
which dismissed
all claims and entered judgment for Defendants. Judge Howells
final order
terminated the case in the District Court. It was not, however,
a ruling on the
merits but on standing.
C. Related Cases
Within this Circuit, Sheriff Arpaio is not a party to any
related litigation.
Appellant is not aware of any other litigation concerning
exactly the same issues
with regard to the Executive Branchs deferred action
programs.
However, the case of Washington Alliance of Technology Workers
v. U.S.
Department of Homeland Security, Civil Action No. 14-529 (ESH),
in the District
Court raises similar challenges to other aspects of the
Executive Branchs
executive action deferred action.
Dated: January 28, 2015
USCA Case #14-5325 Document #1534669 Filed: 01/28/2015 Page 2 of
4
-
8/9/2019 USCA DCC 14-5325 Statement of Related Cases
3/4
Respectfully Submitted,
/s/Larry KlaymanLarry Klayman, Esq.
D.C. Bar No. 3345812020 Pennsylvania Ave. NW #345
Washington, DC 20006Tel: (310) 595-0800
Email: [email protected]
USCA Case #14-5325 Document #1534669 Filed: 01/28/2015 Page 3 of
4
-
8/9/2019 USCA DCC 14-5325 Statement of Related Cases
4/4
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I HEREBY CERTIFY that on this 28th day of January, 2015 a true
and correct
copy of the foregoing was submitted electronically to the U.S.
Court of Appeals forthe District of Columbia Circuit and served via
CM/ECF electronic service upon
the following:
Scott R. McIntosh, Esq.
Jeffrey Clair, Esq.William Havemann, Esq.
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Civil Division, Appellate Staff950 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.
Room 7259Washington, D.C. 20530-0001
[email protected]
[email protected]@usdoj.gov
Attorneys for Defendants-Appellees
Respectfully submitted,
/s/ Larry Klayman
Larry Klayman, Esq.
D.C. Bar No. 334581Freedom Watch, Inc.
2020 Pennsylvania Avenue N.W.,
Suite 345 Washington, D.C. 20006Tel: (310) 595-0800
Email: [email protected]
Attorney for Plaintiff-Appellant
USCA Case #14-5325 Document #1534669 Filed: 01/28/2015 Page 4 of
4
