Upload
reece-moon
View
16
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
US Government Power: Theory and Practice. Dean McSweeney UWE. 1. The Theory. Constitution in operation since 1789 Only 27 amendments since then (10 in 1791, the Bill of Rights). Written Constitution. Earlier experiences weighed heavily in the founders’ thinking - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
Dean McSweeney
UWE
US Government Power: Theory and Practice
1. The Theory
Constitution in operation since 1789 Only 27 amendments since then
(10 in 1791, the Bill of Rights)
Written Constitution
Earlier experiences weighed heavily in the founders’ thinking
Need for government to provide order and freedom Need to avoid a government that threatened
freedom→ Avoid concentrated and unchecked power →
Separation of powers, checks and balances, federalism
2. Theory coincides with practice
Separation of powers
Checks and balances
Separation of powers
The Founders created 4 institutions of government which are still the principal institutions of US government:
- Presidency- Supreme Court- Senate - House of Representatives
(Senate + House= Congress)
Separation of powers
Each institution: – Has separate membership
– Is chosen by a different method
– Is chosen for a different length of time
Separation of powers
Institution Selection Method Term
President Electoral College 4 years
Senate Elected (states) 6 years
House of Reps Elected (districts within states)
2 years
Supreme Court Nominated by President. Needs approval of Senate.
Life
Separation of powers
No person can serve in two institutions at the same time
In 2008 Obama and Biden were members of the Senate when they were elected to the presidency and vice presidency
On election to the executive branch, their seats in the Senate became vacant
3. Checks and Balances: Power-sharing
The term ‘separation of powers’ is misleading Powerholders are separated between different institutions But many powers are shared between institutions Better description:
‘Separated institutions sharing powers’ (Neustadt, 1960)
Checks and Balances: Power-sharing
Shared legislative powers: - President can veto bills passed by Congress to
prevent them becoming law (e.g. George W. Bush vetoed 12 bills in his 8 years in office)
Checks and Balances: Power-sharing
Shared executive powers
- President appoints senior members of the executive branch subject to Senate confirmation (e.g. 2013- John Kerry confirmed as Secretary of State to replace Hilary Clinton)
Checks and Balances: Power-sharing
Shared judicial powers: - Supreme Court decides major court cases but
justices nominated by the president and confirmed by the Senate (e.g. Elena Kagan appointed 2010)
- Justices (and other officials, including the president) can be impeached (removed from office) in a trial conducted by the Senate on charges drawn up the House of Representatives
Checks and Balances
Congress checks the President [through confirmations of appointments, approval of bills]
Congress checks the Supreme Court [appointments, limiting the right to appeal]
The President checks the Supreme Court (and lower courts) [appointment]
The President checks Congress [veto power]
Checks and Balances: Conflict
Conflict between institutions likely because of separation of powers – different people, chosen in different ways, chosen by different people, chosen at different times, chosen for different lengths of time.
They have different roles, powers, interests, constituencies and electorates
Separate elections at separate times allows for different branches of government to be controlled by different parties, e.g.
- Obama (Democratic party) elected president in 2008- Republican party majority elected to House of Representatives
2010
Checks and Balances: Co-operation
Co-operation between branches essential because of checks and balances
Co-operation between president and Congress achieved by:
- Negotiation and compromise- Appeals to public opinion- Fear of electoral retaliation
3. Theory and practice differ
No written constitution can cover every eventuality No written constitution entirely describes practice
Differences between theory and practice in the US:- Judicial review- War powers- Unilateral presidency
i. Judicial Review
Judicial review: the right of the Supreme Court to consider whether laws or actions of the executive conform to the Constitution. If they do not conform, they are ruled unconstitutional and therefore legally invalid
Judicial Review
The Constitution does not give the Supreme Court the power of judicial review
The Court claimed this power for itself soon after coming into existence
Marbury v. Madison (1803) was the first federal law to be ruled unconstitutional
The legislative and executive branches came to accept that the Court could exercise judicial review
Judicial review and checks and balances
Judicial review checks the actions of the other branches of government e.g.
- 165 laws enacted by Congress (and signed by the president) ruled unconstitutional 1803-2010
- President Nixon forced to hand over tape recordings to the courts which implicated him in a criminal cover-up (leading to his resignation in 1974)
Judicial review and rights
In interpreting the Constitution the Court, in effect, writes new laws and has created new rights which are not in the Constitution. These include rights to:
- A defence lawyer in court - Remain silent when questioned by police- An abortion- Unlimited spending of own money to influence
elections
ii. War Power
Article 1, section 8 of the Constitution says:
‘Congress shall have the power to….
Declare war…’
War Power
The Constitution gives the president no role in declaring war
At the constitutional convention one delegate proposed giving the president the power to declare war but no seconder could be found for the proposal and it was not put to a vote
War power in practice
Congress has only declared 5 wars. The last time was 1942
US involvement in wars in Korea, Vietnam, Kuwait, Bosnia, Iraq, Afghanistan etc were started without a declaration of war by Congress
War power in practice
In practice, presidents start wars On occasions they have requested approval
from Congress (but not always) When President Bush senior asked for
authorization of war against Iraq in 1991 he stated that he was not required to do this
iii. The Unilateral Presidency
The war power is an example of the growth of presidential power since the Constitution came into effect
The Unilateral Presidency
According to Article 1 of the Constitution:
‘All legislative Powers herein granted shall be vested in a Congress of the United States, which shall consist of a Senate and House of Representatives.’
Legislating in practice
Many significant policy decisions are approved by Congress in laws or treaties- which only go through the Senate
But presidents have developed the power to make legally binding decisions without the approval of Congress
Legislating in practice
Presidents make legally binding decisions through:
- Executive orders (instructions given to the executive branch)
- Proclamations (public declarations of new conditions or circumstances)
- Executive agreements (with foreign countries)
Legislating in practice
These methods started early in the history of the presidency:
- George Washington issued the first executive orders and proclamations in the 1790s
- President Monroe made the first executive agreement in 1817
Legislating in practice
Many of these measures are not of great political consequence
But there are exceptions Very rarely are they overturned by Congress
or the Supreme Court
Policy and unilateral powers
Significant examples of presidents’ unilateral powers:- Internment of 100, 000+ Japanese Americans (Ex.
Order, 1942)- Desegregation of armed forces (Ex. Order, 1948)- Enforcement of affirmative action (Ex. Order, 1965)- Military tribunals to deal with terrorist suspects (Ex.
Order, 2001)
Policy and unilateral powers
Freeing of slaves in Confederate states (Proclamation, 1863)
Introduction of wage and price freeze (Proclamation, 1971)
Pardon of Vietnam War draft evaders (Proclamation, 1977)
Policy and unilateral powers
Lend-Lease (Ex. Agreement 1940) Yalta and Potsdam Agreements (Ex.
Agreements 1945) Vietnam War peace settlement (Ex.
Agreement, 1973) Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement (Ex.
Agreement 2011)