Upload
archibald-wilkins
View
213
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
U.S. Department of the InteriorU.S. Geological Survey
CBP Partnership Team- Enhance Monitoring in the Bay and its
Watershed
Scott Phillips, USGS
Jonathan Kramer, MD Sea Grant
Outline Monitoring Needs and Objectives
Chesapeake Bay Program Action Plan Presidential Executive Order
Current CBP Monitoring Efforts Partnership Team Objectives
Chesapeake Action Plan CBP Goals
Emphasis on implementation Optimize resources
“Adaptive management” approach Plan
Goals and Targets ID priority areas and practices
Implement Monitor and Assess Evaluate and Adapt
Science and monitoring
Living Resources Habitat
Water Quality
Sound Land Use
Steward-ship
Chesapeake Action Plan
Chesapeake 2000 Topics
Tentative Priorities
Oysters
Striped Bass
Alosa sp.
Menhaden
Blue Crab
SAV
Wetlands
Fish Passage
Wastewater Treatment
Agricultural Lands
Developed Lands
Air Deposition
Shorelines & Streambanks
Land Conservation
Developing Lands
Public Access
Education - Interpretation
General Communication
Chemical Contaminants
Citizen Outreach
Watershed Planning
Adaptive Management—Monitoring and Assessment
Stream health
Rockfish, BluefishMenhaden Habitat
Shad, Herring, Perch and Rockfish Spawning Habitat
-Water-quality standards -Fish, Crabs, and Grasses
Source: EPA
Bay GrassesHabitat
Oyster, Crab, Croaker and Spot
HabitatSummertime Crab Food
Habitat
“Delisting” the Bay
Effectiveness of Actions Water Quality N, P, and sediment
allocations Tributary strategies Changes in nutrients and
sediment
Land Use Changes in sources BMPs
Stream conditions Biological communities Habitat
Estuary response
Presidential Executive Order Topics:
Living resources Water quality Agriculture and watersheds Expand public access Climate Change Monitoring and ecosystem
management
Ecosystem management Report to strengthen
monitoring Fish and wildlife in Bay and
watershed Water quality and habitat Adaptive management Assess existing monitoring and
gaps
Water-quality networks Watershed
NT network Small watersheds
Estuary Status and trends Shallow water
Living Resources/Habitat SAV Fisheries
Monitoring Partnerships
Ecosystem-based fisheries management
Partnership Team Objectives Id existing water quality and habitat programs in
nontidal areas that meet “management effectiveness” needs.
Id partner efforts in tidal areas that could meet “delisting” needs and fill gaps in water quality and habitat monitoring created by funding redirection.
Id partner monitoring programs to assess priority living resources and habitats.
Id gaps where needs are not met. Outcomes:
Chesapeake Bay Program monitoring report Information for Presidential E.O. report
Challenges Scope
Water quality Living resources and habitat Information for E.O.
Interacting with partners Accurate inventory Flexibility in modifying
programs Multiple partners and priorities
Time and people Report deadlines
CBP E.O
Limited availability of people