U.S. COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE DECISIONS REVIEWING

U.S. COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE

DECISIONS REVIEWING DETERMINATIONS

BY THE U.S. INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

ANTIDUMPING/COUNTERVAILING DUTY CASES

(January 1980-July 2008)

mlope

Text Box

*

mlope

Text Box

*This is a draft of an article that is forthcoming in 17 Tul. J. Int'l & Comp. L. (2009). Reprinted with the permission of the Tulane Journal of International and Comparative Law.

1 These materials were prepared by James M. Lyons, Office of the General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission with the assistance of NatalieHulls, Jonas Robison, and Constance Rogers. The views reflected in these materials are the personal perspective of author and should not be considered toconstitute the official position of the ITC or of any or its Commissioners or staff.

JUDICIAL REVIEW OF ITC MATERIAL INJURY DETERMINATIONS1

The accompanying listing of U.S. Court of International Trade decisions reviewing material injury determinations by the U.S.International Trade Commission (“ITC”) in antidumping and countervailing duty proceedings (both original investigations and five-year sunset reviews) identifies the Judge making the decision as well as certain information about the ITC’s determination itself. Forexample, in the columns to the right of the case caption and citation, date of the decision and identity of the Judge, is informationspecifying whether the ITC determination was affirmative or negative with respect to the existence of material injury/threat ofmaterial injury, the number of Commissioners in the majority as well as the number of dissenters, if any. The last two columns in thecase listings then specify whether the ITC’s determination was affirmed by the reviewing Judge or remanded. The cases are set forthin a chronological listing and also grouped by the Judges deciding the appeals, listed in alphabetical order by Judge. The listingscontain all decisions of the Court rendered between 1980 and July 2008. Only those decisions of the Court reviewing a final agencyaction are contained in the listings. Omitted are Court opinions relating to all other matters, including issues such as access toconfidential information, procedural rulings, and statutory provisions other than those relating to final agency actions in antidumpingand countervailing duty determinations.

These case listings and the accompanying charts and graphs, which immediately follow afterwards, were prepared to begin anassessment of whether this data would reveal anything about the frequency of remands and whether the remands that occur are relatedin any meaningful way to either the nature of the Commission determination, i.e., whether a negative or affirmative determination orby the presence or absence of either unanimity, or near unanimity, among the Commissioners in the determinations subject to review. The data also has been examined to consider whether particular Judges are more likely to issue remand orders more frequently thanthe average rate for the Judges collectively.

During this twenty-nine year time period, the Court issued a total of 226 decisions as defined above. Eighty-five of thosedecisions or 38 percent resulted in remands to the ITC. Sometimes there were multiple remands in the course of an appeal from theagency determination(s) subject to the particular court proceeding.

The first graph reveals that when the twenty-nine year period is divided into three distinct ten year periods (nine years in thelast instance), there is noticeable variation in the remands rates. During the first ten years (1980-1989), the remand rate was the

highest with approximately 46 percent of the opinions issued by the Court including remands. The rate declined between 1990-1999to 26 percent and then rebounded to approximately 40 percent for the most recent nine year period.

The second graph depicts the percentage of total decisions remanded by each Judge who has rendered a decision in a caseinvolving the ITC between 1980-2008. As would be expected there is considerable variation among the Judges. The degree ofvariation would appear to be attributable to a number of factors. For one, the fewer the number of ITC determinations reviewed by aJudge means that the circumstances of individual cases will have a disproportionate effect on the percentage of remand/affirmancesoverall for that Judge. Thus, both the highest percentage of remands as well as the lowest percentage of remands are attributable tothose Judges who have decided the fewest cases involving the ITC. Those Judges who have issued fifteen or more opinions involvingthe ITC (only 7 of the 18 Judges issuing decisions reviewing ITC determinations during this period), have issued remands with afrequency that falls within the middle range for the Court as a whole—25 to 40 percent. When multiple remands are issued by asingle Judge in the course of a single appeal, the overall percentage of remand opinions issued by that Judge will be affected upwardsaccordingly. Conversely, if the number of remands for any one Judge were to be adjusted for multiple remands, the percentage ofoverall decisions remanded by that Judge would decline. In this connection, those Judges who have more frequently issued multipleremands tend to have a higher proportion of remands as a percentage of total decisions issued.

The penultimate graph examines whether there is any obvious correlation between whether the ITC decision subject to judicialreview is a negative or affirmative material injury determination and a Court ordered remand. The statistics for this period indicatethat there are a nearly identical percentage of remand decisions issued in both instances; again approximately 37-39 percent.

Finally, the last graph examines whether on a purely statistical basis a remand is more likely when the Commission’sdetermination is not unanimous and whether an evenly divided Commission vote is more likely to result in a remand. The datareveals that a remand is almost twice as likely when the Commission is evenly divided (a 3-3, or 2-2 vote) as when the Commissionissues a unanimous decision.


CHRONOLOGICAL LISTING OF DECISIONS

REVIEWING USITC AD/CVD DETERMINATIONS


Case Name at CITDate

DecidedJudgeRuling

ITC Inv.No. Product

ITCDecision ITC Split Affirmances Remands

Budd Co. Ry. Div. v.US 507 F.Supp. 997 12/29/80 Boe

731-5 and6 (Prelim)

Rail Passenger Cars and parts thereof intendedfor use as original equipment in the UnitedStates from Italy and Japan Negative 5-0 Remanded

Atlantic Sugar Ltd. v.US 519 F.Supp. 916 7/8/81 Watson 731-3 Sugars and Sirups from Canada Affirmative 4-1 Remanded

Babcock & Wilcox Co.v. US 521 F.Supp. 479 8/20/81 Richardson

731-15(Prelim) Pipes and tubes or iron or steel from Japan Negative 4-1 Remanded

Atlantic Sugar Ltd. v.US 2 CIT 295 12/28/81 Watson 731-3 Sugars and Sirups from Canada Affirmative 2-1 Remanded

Atlantic Sugar Ltd. v.US 553 F.Supp. 1055 12/14/82 Watson 731-3 Sugars and Sirups from Canada Affirmative 4-1 Remanded

Freres v. US 6 CIT 42 7/18/83 Boe 731-44 Sorbitol from France Affirmative 4-2 Remanded

Armco Inc. v. US 570F.Supp. 51 8/22/83 Ford 731-26 Certain Steel Wire Nails from Korea Negative 3-2 Affirmed

Atlantic Sugar Ltd. v.US 573 F.Supp. 1142 10/14/83 Watson 731-3 Sugars and Sirups from Canada Affirmative 4-1 Vacated ITC

Freres v. US 583F.Supp. 599 3/19/84 Boe 731-44 Sorbitol from France Affirmative 4-0, 3-1 Affirmed

American Spring WireCorp (and Armco Inc.)v. US 590 F.Supp.1273 7/11/84 Maletz 731-26 Certain Steel Wire Nails from Korea Negative 3-2 Affirmed

Republic Steel Corp. v.US 591 F.Supp. 640 7/11/84 Watson

701-118,126,135, 156,161, 163,172(Prelim)

Carbon Steel Structural Shapes/Hot-rolledCarbon Steel Bar/Cold-formed Carbon SteelBar/ Hot-rolled Carbon Steel Plate/ Negative Various Remanded

Rhone Poulenc v. US592 F.Supp. 1318 7/19/84 Restani 731-25 Anhydrous Sodium Metasilicate from France Affirmative 5-0 Affirmed

British Steel Corp. v.US 593 F.Supp. 405 8/6/84 Newman 701-196 Stainless Steel Plate from the United Kingdom Affirmative 3-0 Dismissed

Jeannette Sheet GlassCorp v. US 607F.Supp. 123 3/22/85 Newman

731-127-129(Prelim)

Thin sheet glass from Switzerland, Belgium andthe Federal Republic of Germany Negative 3-1 Remanded


DecidedJudgeRuling

ITC Inv.No. Product


American Lamb Co. v.US 611 F.Supp. 979 5/31/85 DiCarlo

701-214(Prelim) Lamb meat from New Zealand Negative 4-2 Remanded

Luciano PisoniFabbrica AccessoriInstrumenti Musicali v.US 640 F. Supp. 255 6/12/85 DiCarlo 731-152 Pads for woodwind instrument keys from Italy Affirmative 3-2

Remandedto

Commerce

Maine Potato Councilv. US 613 F.Supp.1237 6/27/85 Restani 731-124 Certain Fresh Potatoes from Canada Negative 3-0 Remanded

Gifford-Hill Cement Co.v. US 615 F.Supp. 577 7/31/85 Restani

731-108-109 Portland Cement from Australia and Japan Negative 4-0 Affirmed

American GrapeGrowers v. US 615F.Supp. 603 8/8/85 Watson

701-210-211; 731-167-168(Prelim) Certain table wine from France and Italy Negative 3-0 Remanded

Armstrong Rubber Co.v. US 614 F.Supp.1252 8/8/85 Watson

731-200(Prelim)

Radial-ply tires for passenger cars from theRepublic of Korea Negative 5-0 Reversed Remanded

Bingham & Taylor v.US 627 F.Supp. 793 2/14/86 Carman

701-249(Prelim) Iron construction castings from Brazil Negative 3-2 Remanded

Kenda RubberIndustrial Co. Ltd v. US630 F. Supp. 354 2/24/86 Carman 731-166 Bicycle Tires and Tubes from Taiwan Affirmative 5-0 Affirmed

Kokusai Electric Co. v.US 632 F. Supp 23 3/14/86 Carman 731-163

Certain cell-site radio apparatus andsubassemblies thereof from Japan Affirmative 4-0 Affirmed

ICC Industries v. US632 F. Supp. 36 3/19/86 Watson 731-125

Potassium permanganate from the People'sRepublic of China Affirmative 4-0 Affirmed

Philipp Brothers, Inc. v.US 640 F.Supp. 1340 7/17/86 DiCarlo 731-161 Titanium Sponge from Japan Affirmative 4-1 Affirmed

Lone Star Steel v. US650 F.Supp. 183 11/28/86 Restani 731-191

Oil Country Tubular Goods from Argentina,Brazil, the Republic of Korea, Mexico, andSpain Negative 5-0 Affirmed


731-127-129(Prelim)

Thin sheet glass from Switzerland, Belgium andthe Federal Republic of Germany Negative 5-0 Affirmed


DecidedJudgeRuling

ITC Inv.No. Product


Fundicao Tupy v. US652 F. Supp. 1538 1/13/87 Watson 731-278

Certain malleable cast-iron pipe fittings fromBrazil Affirmative 5-0 Affirmed

USX Corporation v.United States 655F.Supp. 487 2/9/87 Restani 731-175

Cold-rolled carbon steel sheet from Argentina,South Africa and Spain Negative 4-0, 3-1 Remanded

Hyundai Pipe Co. v.USTIC 670 F.Supp.357 2/23/87 DiCarlo

731-131-132, 138

Certain welded carbon steel pipes from theRepublic of Korea and Taiwan, Certainrectangular welded carbon steel pipes andtubes from the Republic of Korea Affirmative

4-0, 3-1,3-1, 4-0 Dismissed

Yuasa-General BatteryCorp. v. US 661F.Supp. 1214 5/22/87 Aquilino

731-238(Prelim) 12 volt motorcycle batteries from Japan Negative 5-0 Remanded

National PorkProducers Council v.US 661 F.Supp. 633 5/28/87 DiCarlo 701-224 Live swine and pork from Canada Negative 2-1 Affirmed

BMT Commodity Corp.v. US 667 F.Supp. 880 7/22/87 Restani 731-199 Certain dried salted codfish from Canada Affirmative 4-1 Affirmed

Alberta PorkProducers' Mktg. Bd. v.US 669 F.Supp. 445 8/7/87 DiCarlo 701-224 Live swine and pork from Canada Affirmative 2-1 Remanded

Hercules Inc. v. US673 F. Supp. 454 10/20/87 Carman

731-96;701-190 Nitrocellulose from France Affirmative 2-1 Affirmed

Empire Plow Co. v. US675 F. Sup. 1348 11/18/87 Carman 701-223 Agricultural tillage tools from Brazil Negative 3-2 Affirmed

Wells Mfg. Co. v. US677 F.Supp. 1239 12/8/87 Carman

701-208(Prelim) Iron bars from Brazil Negative 4-0 Affirmed

Copperweld Corp. v.US 682 F.Supp. 552 2/24/88 Carman 731-254

Heavy-walled rectangular welded carbon steelpipes and tubes from Canada Negative 4-0 Affirmed


Cold-rolled carbon steel plates and sheets fromArgentina Negative 4-1 Remanded

Keyes Fibre Co. v. US682 F.Supp. 583 3/16/88 Aquilino 731-201 Egg filler flats from Canada Negative 5-0 Remanded


DecidedJudgeRuling

ITC Inv.No. Product


Armstrong Rubber Co.v. US 685 F.Supp. 252 3/17/88 Watson

731-200(Prelim)

Radial-ply tires for passenger cars from theRepublic of Korea Negative 5-0 Remanded

Alberta PorkProducers' Mktg. Bd. v.US 683 F.Supp. 1398 3/22/88 DiCarlo 701-224 Live swine and pork from Canada Affirmative 2-1 Affirmed

Maverick Tube Corp. v.US 687 F. Supp. 1569 5/24/88 DiCarlo

731-375(Prelim) Certain line pipes and tubes from Canada Negative 4-1 Remanded

Algoma Steel Corp Ltdv. US 688 F.Supp. 639 6/8/88 Restani

731-276-277

Oil Country Tubular goods from Canada andTaiwan Affirmative 4-2 Affirmed


731-238(Prelim) 12 volt motorcycle batteries from Japan Negative 6-0 Reversed

AssociacionColombiana deExportadores de Floresv. US 693 F.Supp.1165 7/14/88 Restani

701-275-278; 731-327-333

Certain fresh cut flowers from Canada, Chile,Colombia, Costa Rica, Ecuador, Kenya, andMexico Affirmative 3-2 Remanded

Keyes Fibre Co. v. US691 F.Supp. 376 7/22/88 Aquilino 731-201 Egg filler flats from Canada Negative 4-2 Remanded

Asahi Chemical Indus.Co. v. US 692 F.Supp.1376 7/25/88 Rao 731-1, 2 Spun acrylic yarn from Japan and Italy Affirmative 5-0 Remanded

National Ass'n of MirrorMfrs. v. US 696F.Supp. 642 8/25/88 DiCarlo

731-320-325

Certain unfinished mirrors from Belgium,Federal Republic of Germany, Italy, Japan,Portugal, and the United Kingdom Negative 5-0, 4-1 Affirmed


Cold-rolled carbon steel plates and sheets fromArgentina Negative 4-1 Affirmed

Chaparral Steel Co. v.US 698 F.Supp. 254 9/28/88 Carman 731-234

Carbon steel angles, shapes, and sections fromNorway Negative 4-1 Remanded

Mitsubishi ElectricCopr v. US 700 F.Supp 538 10/31/88 Carman 731-207

Cellular Mobile Telephones and assembliesthereof from Japan Affirmative 4-1 Remanded


DecidedJudgeRuling

ITC Inv.No. Product


Negev Phosphates v.US DOC and USITC699 F.Supp. 938 11/9/88 DiCarlo

701-286;731-365-366 Industrial phophoric acid from Belgium Affirmative 3-2 Affirmed


701-275-278; 731-327-333

Certain fresh cut flowers from Canada, Chile,Colombia, Costa Rica, Ecuador, Kenya, andMexico Negative 5-0 Affirmed

Citrosuco Paulista v.US 704 F.Supp. 1075 12/30/88 DiCarlo 731-326 Frozen concentrated orange juice from Brazil Affirmative 5-1 Remanded

Florex v. US 705 F.Supp. 582 1/6/89 Restani 731-333 Certain fresh cut flowers from Mexico Affirmative 3-2 Affirmed

Citrosuco Paulista v.US 706 F.Supp. 1333 3/13/89 DiCarlo 731-326 Frozen concentrated orange juice from Brazil Affirmative 5-1 Affirmed

Hannibal Industries v.US 710 F.Supp. 332 3/17/89 DiCarlo 731-349

Certain welded carbon steel pipes and tubesfrom Taiwan Negative 3-2 Remanded

Borlem S.A.EmpreedimentosIndustriais v. US 710F.Supp. 797 3/22/89 Carman 731-335 Tubeless steel disk wheels from Brazil Affirmative 4-1 Remanded

LMI-La MetalliIndustriale v. US 712F. Supp 959 4/11/89 DiCarlo

701-270;731-313-314, 316-317

Certain brass sheet and strip from France, Italy,Sweden, and West Germany Affirmative 3-2 Affirmed

Sony Corporation ofAmerica v. US 712F.Supp. 978 4/26/89 Musgrave

731-367-370

Color Picture Tubes from Canada, Japan, theRepublic of Korea, and Singapore Affirmative 5-1 Affirmed

Granges MetallverkenAB v. US 716 F. Supp.17 6/7/89 DiCarlo

701-270;731-313-314, 316-317

Certain brass sheet and strip from France, Italy,Sweden, and West Germany Affirmative 3-2 Dismissed

Wieland Werke AG v.US 718 F.Supp. 50 7/10/89 DiCarlo

701-270;731-313-314, 316-317


Marsuda-RodgersInternational v. US 719F. Supp. 1092 7/26/89 Tsoucalas

731-341,344, 345

Tapered Roller Bearings from Hungary andRomania Affirmative 3-2 Reversed Remanded


DecidedJudgeRuling

ITC Inv.No. Product


Roses, Inc. v. US 720F.Supp. 180 8/18/89 Aquilino 731-148 Fresh cut roses from Colombia Negative 3-1 Affirmed

Sandvik AB v. US 721F.Supp. 1322 9/14/89 Carman 731-354 Stainless steel pipes and tubes from Sweden Affirmative 4-1 Affirmed

Asahi Chemical Indus.Co. v. US 727 F.Supp.625 12/9/89 Tsoucalas 731-1, 2 Spun acrylic yarn from Japan and Italy Affirmative 5-0 Affirmed

MetallverkenNederland BV v. US728 F. Supp. 730 12/18/89 DiCarlo

731-379-380

Certain brass sheet and strip from Japan andthe Netherlands Affirmative 3-3 Remanded

Cambridge LeeIndustries v. US 728F.Supp. 748 12/21/89 DiCarlo

731-379-380

Certain brass sheet and strip from Japan andthe Netherlands Affirmative 3-3 Affirmed

Remandedin part

MBL (USA) andMitsubishi Belting Ltd.V. US 733 F.Supp. 379 3/14/90 Aquilino

701-293-295, 731-412-419

Industrial belts from Israel, Italy, Japan,Singapore, the Republic of Korea, Taiwan, theUK, and West Germany Affirmative 3-3

Summaryjudgmentpartially

dismissed,partiallygranted

Marsuda-RodgersInternational v. US 734F.Supp. 1019 4/3/90 Tsoucalas

731-341,344, 345

Tapered Roller Bearings from Hungary andRomania Negative 6-0 Affirmed

Trent Tube Division v.US 741 F.Supp. 921 6/20/90 Carman 731-354 Stainless steel pipes and tubes from Sweden Negative 3-2

Remandedin part


731-379-380

Certain brass sheet and strip from Japan andthe Netherlands Affirmative 4-2 Dismissed

Suramericana deAleaciones Laminidas,C.A. v. US 746 F.Supp.139 8/22/90 Musgrave

701-287;731-378

Certain Electrical Conductor Aluminum RedrawRod from Venezuela Affirmative 4-0 Vacated

Remanded[by CAFC]


DecidedJudgeRuling

ITC Inv.No. Product


Torrington Co. v. US747 F.Supp. 744 9/11/90 Tsoucalas

731-391-399

Anti-friction bearings (other than tapered rollerbearings) and parts thereof from WestGermany, France, Italy, Japan, Romania,Singapore, Sweden, Thailand, and the UnitedKingdom Affirmative Various Affirmed

Trent Tube Division v.US 752 F.Supp. 468 11/27/90 Carman 731-354 Stainless steel pipes and tubes from Sweden Affirmative 3-2 Affirmed



United Engineeringand Forging v. US 779F.Supp. 1375 11/18/91 Aquilino

701-282;731-351,353

Certain Forged steel crankshafts from theFederal Republic of Germany and the UnitedKingdom Affirmative 4-1 Affirmed

Borlem S.A.EmpreedimentosIndustriais v. US 786F.Supp. 1031 3/3/92 Carman 731-335 Tubeless steel disk wheels from Brazil Negative 4-1 Affirmed

Bando ChemicalIndustries, Ltd. v. US787 F.Supp. 224 3/5/92 Aquilino

701-293;731-412-419

Industrial belts from Israel, Italy, Japan,Singapore, the Republic of Korea, Taiwan, theUK, and West Germany Affirmative 3-3 Remanded

Brother Industries Ltdv. US 787 F.Supp.1454 3/12/92 Restani 731-483 Certain personal word processors from Japan Affirmative 4-0 Dismissed

Torrington Co. v. US790 F.Supp. 1161 4/3/92 DiCarlo

701-307;731-498-511(Prelim)

Ball Bearings, Mounted or Unmounted andParts Thereof, from Argentina, Austria, Brazil,Canada, Hong Kong, Hungary, Mexico, thePeople's Republic of China, Poland, theRepublic of Korea, Spain, Taiwan, Turkey, andYugoslavia Negative 3-1 Affirmed

Cemex v. US 790F.Supp. 290 4/7/92 Carman 731-451

Gray portland cement and cement clinker fromMexico Affirmative 2-1 Affirmed


DecidedJudgeRuling

ITC Inv.No. Product


Calabrian Corp v.USITC 794 F. Supp.377 5/13/92 Carman

701-303;731-465-468(Prelim)

Certain sodium sulfur chemical compoundsfrom West Germany, China, Turkey, and theUnited Kingdom Negative Various Dismissed

Minebea Co. Ltd andNMB Corp. v. US 794F. Supp. 1161 7/6/92 Tsoucalas

731-391-399


Chung Ling Co. v. US805 F.Supp. 45 7/28/92 Carman

731-448-450

Sweaters wholly or in chief weight of man-madefiber from Hong Kong, the Republic of Korea,and Taiwan Affirmative 2-1 Remanded

Encon Industries v. US16 CIT 840 9/24/92 Restani 731-473

Certain Electric Fans From the People'sRepublic of China and Taiwan Affirmative 3-1 Affirmed

Chr. Bjelland SeafoodsA/S v. US 16 CIT 945 10/23/92 Goldberg

701-302;731-454 Fresh and chilled Atlantic salmon from Norway Affirmative 3-1 Reversed Remanded

Tianjin MachineryImport and ExportCorp. v. US 16 CIT1020 12/1/92 Goldberg 731-457

Heavy Forged Hand Tools from the People'sRepublic of China Affirmative 4-0 Remanded

Hosiden Corp v. US810 F. Supp. 322 12/29/92 Goldberg 731-469

High-Information Content Flat Panel Displaysand Subassemblies Thereof from Japan Affirmative 3-1 Reversed Remanded

Holmes Products Corpv. US 16 CIT 1101 12/30/92 Restani 731-473

Certain Electric Fans From the People'sRepublic of China and Taiwan Affirmative 3-1 Remanded

Camargo CorreaMetais v. US 17 CIT 35 1/22/93 Musgrave 731-471 Silicon Metal From Brazil Affirmative 4-0 Affirmed


701-287;731-378

Certain Electrical Conductor Aluminum RedrawRod from Venezuela Affirmative 4-0 Remanded

Committee of DomesticSteel Wire Rope &Specialty Cable Mfrs.v. US 808 F.Supp. 376 3/30/93 Tsoucalas

701-305;731-478,480-482

Steel Wire Rope from Chile, India, the People'sRepublic of China, Taiwan, and Thailand Negative 4-0 Affirmed


DecidedJudgeRuling

ITC Inv.No. Product


Mitsubishi MaterialsCorp. v. US 820 F.Supp. 608 4/27/93 Goldberg 731-461

Gray portland cement and cement clinker fromJapan Affirmative 3-1

Affirmed inpart

Remandedin part

Tianjin MachineryImport and ExportCorp. v. US 820F.Supp. 1456 4/27/93 Goldberg 731-457

Heavy Forged Hand Tools from the People'sRepublic of China Affirmative 4-0 Affirmed

Texas Crushed StoneCo. v. US 822 F.Supp.773 5/25/93 Carman

731-562(Prelim) Crushed Limestone from Mexico Negative 5-0 Affirmed

Feldspar Corp. v. US825 F.Supp. 1095 6/23/93 Carman 731-525 Nepheline Syenite from Canada Negative 6-0 Dismissed

General Motors Corp.v. USITC 827 F.Supp.774 7/12/93 Restani 731-522 Minivans from Japan Negative 4-2 Affirmed


701-287;731-378

Certain Electrical Conductor Aluminum RedrawRod from Venezuela Negative 4-2 Affirmed

Bando ChemicalIndustries, Ltd. v. US17 CIT 798 8/6/93 Aquilino

701-293;731-412-419

Industrial belts from Israel, Italy, Japan,Singapore, the Republic of Korea, Taiwan, theUK, and West Germany Affirmative 5-1 Affirmed


731-448-450

Sweaters wholly or in chief weight of man-madefiber from Hong Kong, the Republic of Korea,and Taiwan Negative 6-0 Affirmed

R-M Industries v. US848 F.Supp. 204 3/18/94 Restani

701-318;731-560-561

Sulfanilic Acid from the Republic of Hungaryand India Negative 4-2 Remanded


High-Information Content Flat Panel Displaysand Subassemblies Thereof from Japan

Affirmative/Negative 3-3, 4-2 Affirmed

Connecticut SteelCorp. v. US 852F.Supp. 1061 4/22/94 DiCarlo

731-649(Prelim) Steel Wire Rod from Trinidad and Tobago Negative 5-1 Affirmed

Grupo IndustrialCamesa v. U.S. 853 F.Supp. 440 5/18/94 DiCarlo

731-546-547

Steel Wire Rope from the Republic of Koreaand Mexico Affirmative 3-3 Affirmed


DecidedJudgeRuling

ITC Inv.No. Product


R-M Industries v. US18 CIT 577 6/14/94 Restani

701-318;731-560-561

Sulfanilic Acid from the Republic of Hungaryand India

Affirmative/Negative 4-2; 4-2 Affirmed

Saarstahl AG v. US858 F.Supp 196 6/24/94 Carman

701-314-317; 731-552-555

Certain Hot-Rolled Lead and Bismuth CarbonSteel Products from Brazil, France, Germany,and the United Kingdom Negative 5-1 Affirmed

United States SteelGroup v. US 873F.Supp. 673 12/30/94 Restani

701-319-332, 334,336-342,344, 347-353; 731-573-579,581-592,594-597,599-609,612-619

Certain Flat-Rolled Steel Products fromAustralia, Austria, Belgium, Brazil, Canada,Finland, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, Korea,Mexico, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Poland,Romania, Spain, Sweden, and the UnitedKingdom Negative 5-1; 4-2 Affirmed


701-302;731-454 Fresh Chilled Atlantic Salmon from Norway Affirmative 3-3 Affirmed

Kern-Liebers USAv.US 19 cIT 87 1/27/95 Restani

701-319-332, 334,336-342,344, 347-353; 731-573-579,581-592,594-597,599-609,612-619

Certain Flat-Rolled Steel Products fromAustralia, Austria, Belgium, Brazil, Canada,Finland, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, Korea,Mexico, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Poland,Romania, Spain, Sweden, and the UnitedKingdom

Affirmative/Negative Various Affirmed

Nippon Steel Corp. v.US 19 CIT 450 4/3/95 Restani

701-319-332, 334,336-342,344, 347-353; 731-573-579,581-592,594-597,599-609,612-619

Certain Flat-Rolled Steel Products fromAustralia, Austria, Belgium, Brazil, Canada,Finland, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, Korea,Mexico, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Poland,Romania, Spain, Sweden, and the UnitedKingdom Affirmative Various

Affirmed inpart

Remandedin part


DecidedJudgeRuling

ITC Inv.No. Product


Stalexport v. US 890F.Supp. 1053 5/23/95 Tsoucalas

701-319-332, 334,336-342,344, 347-353; 731-573-579,581-592,594-597,599-609,612-619

Certain Flat-Rolled Carbon Steel Products fromArgentina, Australia, Austria, Belgium, Brazil,Canada, Finland, France, Germany, Italy,Japan, Korea, Mexico, the Netherlands, NewZealand, Poland, Romania, Spain, Sweden,and the United Kingdom Negative Various Affirmed


701-319-332, 334,336-342,344, 347-353; 731-573-579,581-592,594-597,599-609,612-619

Certain Flat-Rolled Steel Products fromAustralia, Austria, Belgium, Brazil, Canada,Finland, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, Korea,Mexico, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Poland,Romania, Spain, Sweden, and the UnitedKingdom Affirmative Various Affirmed

Acciai Speciali Terni v.US 19 CIT 1051 8/7/95 Restani

701-355;731-659-660

Grain Oriented Silicon Electrical Steel from Italyand Japan Affirmative 3-1, 5-0 Affirmed

Timken Co. v. US 913F.Supp. 580 1/3/96 Tsoucalas 731-572

Certain Special Quality Carbon and Alloy Hot-Rolled Steel Bars and Rods and SemifinishedProducts Thereof from Brazil Negative 6-0 Affirmed


Gray portland cement and cement clinker fromJapan Affirmative 4-2 Affirmed

Aristech ChemicalCorp. v. US Slip Op.96-51 3/11/96 Musgrave

701-358;731-667(Prelim) Phthalic Anhydride from Mexico Negative 5-1 Affirmed

Companhia Paulista v.US 20 CIT 473 4/15/96 Restani

731-671-674

Silicomanganese from Brazil, the People'sRepublic of China, Ukraine, and Venezuela Affirmative 3-3 Affirmed

Floral Trade Council v.US 20 CIT 595 5/17/96 Restani

731-684-685 Fresh Cut Roses from Colombia and Ecuador Negative 4-2 Affirmed


DecidedJudgeRuling

ITC Inv.No. Product


Hyundai ElectronicsIndustries Co. v.USITC 20 CIT 805 7/5/96 Goldberg 731-556

Drams of one Megabit and Above from theRepublic of Korea Affirmative 3-3 Remanded

Mukand v. US 937 f.Supp 910 8/2/96 Goldberg 731-638 Stainless Steel Wire Rod from India Affirmative 4-2 Affirmed

Gerald Metals Inc v.US 937 F. Supp. 930 8/21/96 Pogue

731-696-698 Magnesium from China, Russia, and Ukraine Affirmative 3-3 Affirmed

Guangxi Gitric Import &Export Corp v. U.S.955 F.Supp. 1477 1/8/97 Pogue

731-726-727, 729

Polyvinyl Alcohol from China, Japan, andTaiwan Affirmative 3-3 Dismissed

BIC Corp. v. US 964F.Supp. 391 4/24/97 Goldberg

731-700-701 Disposable Lighters from China and Thailand Negative 4-2 Affirmed

Dastech InternationalInc. v. USITC 963F.Supp. 1220 5/1/97 Wallach 731-653

Sebacic Acid from the People's Republic ofChina Affirmative 4-2 Affirmed

Hyundai ElectronicsIndustries Co. v.USITC CIT Slip Op.97-53 5/2/97 Goldberg 731-556

Drams of one Megabit and Above from theRepublic of Korea Affirmative 3-1 Affirmed

Makita Corp. v. US 974F.Supp. 770 7/8/97 Aquilino 731-571

Professional Electric Cutting andSanding/Grinding Tools from Japan Affirmative Various

Actiondismissed

Gerald Metals Inc v.US 8 F. Supp.2d 861 4/28/98 Pogue

731-696-698 Magnesium from China, Russia, and Ukraine Affirmative 3-3

Vacatedprevious Remanded

Coalition for thePreservation ofAmerican Brake Drum& Rotor AftermarketMfrs v. US 15F.Supp.2d 918 7/13/98 Wallach 731-744 Certain Brake Drums and Rotors from China Negative 4-0 Affirmed

Goss Graphics SystemInc. v. US 33F.Supp.2d 1082 10/16/98 Pogue

731-736-737

Large Newspaper Printing Presses andComponents Thereof, Whether Assembled orUnassembled, from Germany and Japan Affirmative 5-0 Affirmed

Gerald Metals Inc v.US 27 F.Supp.2d 1351 10/20/98 Pogue

731-696-698 Magnesium from China, Russia, and Ukraine Negative 2-1 Affirmed


DecidedJudgeRuling

ITC Inv.No. Product


NEC Corp. v. US DOCand USITC 36F.Supp.2d 380 12/15/98 Pogue 731-750 Vector Supercomputers from Japan Affirmative 3-0 Remanded

Taiwan SemiconductorIndustry Association v.US 59 F.Supp.2d 1324 6/30/99 Pogue

731-761-762

Static Random Access MemorySemiconductors from the Republic of Korea andTaiwan Affirmative 1-1 Remanded

Asociacion deProductores deSalmon y Trucha deChile v. USITC SlipOp. 99-58 7/2/99 Goldberg 731-768 Fresh Atlantic Salmon from Chile Affirmative 2-1 Remanded

Ranchers-CattlemenAction LegalFoundation v. US 74F.Supp.2d 1353 11/5/99 Carman

701-386;731-812-813(Prelim) Live Cattle from Canada and Mexico Negative 5-1 Affirmed

NEC Corp. v. US DOCand USITC 83F.Supp.2d 1339 12/17/99 Pogue 731-750 Vector Supercomputers from Japan Affirmative 3-1 Affirmed

Taiwan SemiconductorIndustry Association v.US 93 F.Supp.2d1283/105 F.Supp.2d1363 4/11/00 Pogue

731-761-762

Static Random Access MemorySemiconductors from the Republic of Korea andTaiwan Negative 4-1 Remanded

Asociacion deProductores deSalmon y Trucha deChile v. USITC 24 CIT654 7/27/00 Goldberg 731-768 Fresh Atlantic Salmon from Chile Affirmative 5-1 Remanded

Allegheny LudlumCorp. v. US 116F.Supp.2d 1276 8/28/00 Wallach

701-376-377, 379;731-788-793

Certain Stainless Steel Plate from Belgium,Canada, Italy, Korea, South Africa, and Taiwan Negative 4-2 Affirmed

Taiwan SemiconductorIndustry Association v.US 118 F.Supp.2d1250 8/29/00 Pogue

731-761-762

Static Random Access MemorySemiconductors from the Republic of Korea andTaiwan Negative 4-1 Affirmed


DecidedJudgeRuling

ITC Inv.No. Product


Asociacion deProductores deSalmon y Trucha deChile v. USITC 24 CIT969 9/8/00 Goldberg 731-768 Fresh Atlantic Salmon from Chile Affirmative 5-1 Remanded

Acciai Speciali Terni v.US 118 F. Supp. 2d1298 10/2/00 Wallach

701-376-379; 731-788-793 Stainless Steel Plate from the United Kingdom Affirmative 4-2 Affirmed

USEC Inc. v. US 132F.Supp.2d 1 1/24/01 Barzilay 731-539 Uranium from Kazakhstan Negative 3-0 Affirmed

Steel Authority of Indiav. US 146 F.Supp.2d900 5/22/01 Pogue

701-387-391; 731-816-821

Certain Cut to Length Steel Plate from France,India, Indonesia, Italy, Japan, and Korea Affirmative 6-0 Affirmed

Titanium Metals Corp.v. US 155 F.Supp.2d750 6/22/01 Barzilay

731-161(Review) Titanium Sponge from Japan Negative 3-0 Affirmed

Ad Hoc Committee ofDomestic UraniumProduers v. US 162F.Supp.2d 649 8/14/01 Restani

731-539-C, E, andF(Review) Uranium from Russia, Ukraine, and Uzbekistan Negative 5-0 Affirmed

Far Eastern Textile Ltdv. USITC slip Op. 01-102 8/14/01 Restani

731-825-826

Certain Polyester Staple Fiber from Korea andTaiwan Affirmative 6-0 Affirmed

ALTX Inc. v. US 167F.Supp.2d 1353 9/19/01 Restani 731-859

Circular Seamless Stainless Steel HollowProducts from Japan Negative 4-2 Remanded

Chefline Corp. v. US170 F.Supp.2d 1320 9/26/01 Pogue

701-267-268; 731-297-299,304-305(Review)

Certain Porcelain-on-Steel Cooking Ware fromChina, Taiwan, and Mexico and Top-of-the-Stove Stainless Steel Cooking Ware from Koreaand Taiwan Affirmative 3-3 Remanded

Nippon Steel Corp. v.US 182 F.Supp.2d1330 12/31/01 Restani 731-860

Tin and Chromium Coated Steel Sheet fromJapan Affirmative 4-2 Remanded

Asociacion deProductores deSalmon y Trucha deChile v. USITC 180F.Supp.2d 1360 1/9/02 Goldberg 731-768 Fresh Atlantic Salmon from Chile Affirmative 5-1 Affirmed


DecidedJudgeRuling

ITC Inv.No. Product


Elkem Metals Co. v.US 193 F.Supp.2d1314 2/21/02 Eaton

731-566-570, 641

Ferrosilicon from Brazil, China, Kazakhstan,Russia, Ukraine, and Venezuela Negative 6-0 Remanded

Committee of DomesticSteel Wire Rope &Specialty Cable Mfrs.v. US 201 F.Supp.2d1287 4/5/02 Barzilay

731-868-869

Steel Wire Rope from India and the People'sRepublic of China Negative 6-0 Affirmed

Usinor Industeel v. USSlip Op. 02-39 4/29/02 Restani

701-319;731-573(Review) Certain Cut to Length Steel Plate from Belgium Affirmative 6-0 Remanded

Co-Steel Raritan, Inc.v. US 244 F.Supp.2d1349 6/20/02 Aquilino

701-417-431; 731-953-965(Prelim)

Carbon and Alloy Steel Wire Rod from Brazil,Canada, Egypt, Germany, Indonesia, Mexico,Moldova, South Africa, Trinidad and Tobago,Ukraine, and Venezuela Negative 4-1 Remanded

ALTX Inc. v. US 26 CIT709 7/12/02 Restani 731-859

Circular Seamless Stainless Steel HollowProducts from Japan Affirmative 3-3 Remanded

Usinor, Beautour v. US26 CIT 767 7/19/02 Wallach

701-319-332; 731-573-579 Flat-rolled Carbon Steel Products Affirmative 4-2 Remanded

Ugine-Savoie Imphy v.US Slip Op. 02-79 7/31/02 Goldberg

701-178;731-636-638(Review)

Stainless Steel Wire Rod from Brazil, France,India, and Spain Affirmative 5-1 Affirmed


701-267-268; 731-297-299,304-305(Review)

Certain Porcelain-on-Steel Cooking Ware fromChina, Taiwan, and Mexico and Top-of-the-Stove Stainless Steel Cooking Ware from Koreaand Taiwan Affirmative 5-1 Affirmed


Tin and Chromium Coated Steel Sheet fromJapan Affirmative 4-2 Vacated

Indorama Chemicals(Thailand) Ltd. V.USITC Slip Op. 02-1-4 9/4/02 Carman

731-703,705(Review)

Furfuryl Alcohol from the People's Republic ofChina and Thailand Affirmative 6-0 Affirmed


DecidedJudgeRuling

ITC Inv.No. Product


Co-Steel Raritan, Inc.v. US Slip Op. 02-113 9/13/02 Aquilino

701-417-431; 731-953-965(Prelim)

Carbon and Alloy Steel Wire Rod from Brazil,Canada, Egypt, Germany, Indonesia, Mexico,Moldova, South Africa, Trinidad and Tobago,Ukraine, and Venezuela Affirmative 6-0 Affirmed

Usinor Industeel v. US26 CIT 1402 12/20/02 Restani


Nippon Steel Corp. v.US Slip Op. 02-153 12/24/02 Eaton

701-355;731-659-660(Review)

Grain Oriented Silicon Electrical Steel from Italyand Japan Affirmative 3-3 Remanded

ALTX Inc. v. US SlipOp. 02-154 12/31/02 Restani 731-859

Circular Seamless Stainless Steel HollowProducts from Japan Negative 3-2 Affirmed

Corus Staal v. USITCSlip Op. 03-32 3/21/03 Restani

701-405-408; 731-899-904,906-908

Hot Rolled Steel Products from China, India,Indonesia, Kazakhstan, the Netherlands,Romania, South Africa, Taiwan, Thailand, andUkraine Affirmative 6-0 Affirmed

Timken U.S. Corp. v.US 264 F.Supp.2d1264 4/24/03 Tsoucalas

AA-1921-143; 731-343(Review)

Certain Bearings from China, France, Germany,Hungary, Italy, Japan, Romania, Singapore,Sweden, and the United Kingdom Negative 4-1 Remanded

Committee for FairCoke Trade v. US 27CIT 774 5/20/03 Eaton

731-951-952(Prelim) Blast Furnace Coke from China and Japan Negative 3-2 Remanded


731-566-570, 641


Committee for FairBeam Imports v. USSlip Op. 03-73 6/27/03 Barzilay

731-935-936, 938-942

Structural Steel Beams from China, Germany,Italy, Luxembourg, Russia, South Africa, Spainand Taiwan Negative 4-1 Affirmed

Committee for FairlyTraded VenezuelanCement v. US 279F.Supp.2d 1314 7/28/03 Ridgway

731-451,461, 519(Review)

Gray Portland Cement and Cement Clinkerfrom Japan, Mexico, and Venezuela Negative 5-0 Affirmed


DecidedJudgeRuling

ITC Inv.No. Product


NMB Singapore Ltd. v.US 288 F.Supp.2d1308 9/3/03 Tsoucalas

AA1921-143; 731-341, 343-345, 391,399(Review)

Certain Bearings from China, France, Germany,Hungary, Italy, Japan, Romania, Singapore,Sweden, and the United Kingdom Affirmative 4-1 Remanded


701-319;731-573(Review) Certain Cut to Length Steel Plate from Belgium Affirmative 4-0 Affirmed

United States SteelCorp. v. US 294F.Supp.2d 1359 10/28/03 Goldberg

701-393-396; 731-829-840

Certain Cold-Rolled Steel Products fromArgentina, Brazil, Japan, Russia, South Africa,and Thailand Negative 5-1 Remanded

Nippon Steel Corp. v.US 301 F.Supp.2d1367 12/17/03 Eaton

701-355;731-659-660(Review)


Olin Corp.-BrassGroup v. US Slip Op.04-04 1/9/04 Aquilino

701-269-270; 731-311-317,379-380(Review)

Brass Sheet and Strip from Brazil, Canada,France, Germany, Italy, Japan, Korea, theNetherlands, and Sweden Negative 4-2 Affirmed


731-391,394, 397,399


Nucor Corp. v. US 318F.Supp. 2d 1207 2/19/04 Carman

731-965,971-972,979, 981

Certain Cold-Rolled Steel Products fromAustralia, India, Japan, Sweden, and Thailand Negative 4-1 Affirmed


AA-1921-143; 731-343(Review)

Certain Bearings from China, France, Germany,Hungary, Italy, Japan, Romania, Singapore,Sweden, and the United Kingdom Negative 2-1 Affirmed


731-566-570, 641


Usinor, Beautour v. US342 F. Supp. 2d 1267 6/9/04 Wallach

701-319-332; 731-573-579 Flat-rolled Carbon Steel Products Affirmative 4-0 Affirmed


DecidedJudgeRuling

ITC Inv.No. Product


Committee for FairCoke Trade v. US SlipOp. 04-68 6/10/04 Eaton

731-951-952(Prelim) Blast Furnace Coke from China and Japan Negative 2-1 Affirmed

Bratsk AluminumSmelter v. US 28 CIT955 6/22/04 Tsoucalas 731-991 Silicon Metal from Russia Affirmative 3-0 Remanded


AA1921-143; 731-341, 343-345. 391,399(Review)

Certain Bearings from China, France, Germany,Hungary, Italy, Japan, Romania, Singapore,Sweden, and the United Kingdom Affirmative 3-0 Affirmed

Timken U.S. Corp. v.US Slip Op. 04-98 8/9/04 Tsoucalas

731-391,394, 397,399


Sensient TechnologiesCorp v. US Slip Op.04-115 9/10/04 Musgrave

701-433;731-1029(Prelim) Allura Red Coloring from India Negative 4-0 Affirmed

American BearingManufacturersAssociation v. US 350F.Supp.2d 1100 9/16/04 Eaton 731-989 Ball Bearings from China Negative 4-0 Affirmed



Siderca, S.A.I.C. v. US350 F.Supp.2d 1223 10/27/04 Pogue

701-362;731-707-710(Review)

Certain Seamless Carbon and Alloy SteelStandard, Line and Pressure Pipe fromArgentina, Brazil, Germany, and Italy Affirmative 6-0 Remanded

Allied Mineral ProductsInc. v. US Slip Op. 04-139 11/12/04 Restani 731-1022 Refined Brown Aluminum Oxide from China Affirmative 5-0 Affirmed


701-393-396; 731-829-840

Certain Cold-Rolled Steel Products fromArgentina, Brazil, Japan, Russia, South Africa,and Thailand Negative 5-1 Affirmed


DecidedJudgeRuling

ITC Inv.No. Product


Nitrogen Solutions FairTrade Committee v.US 358 F.Supp.2d1314 1/31/05 Goldberg

731-1006,1008-1009

Urea Ammonium Nitrate Solutions fromBelarus, Russia, and Ukraine Negative 4-0 Affirmed

Caribbean Ispat Ltd. v.US 366 F.Supp.2d1300 3/22/05 Aquilino

701-417-421; 731-953-963

Carbon and Certain Alloy Steel Wire Rod fromBrazil, Canada, Germany, Indonesia, Mexico,Moldova, Trinidad and Tobago, and Ukraine Affirmative 5-0 Affirmed

Remanded[by CAFC]

Nippon Steel Corp. v.US Slip Op. 05-38 3/23/05 Restani 731-860

Tin and Chromium Coated Steel Sheet fromJapan Negative N/A Affirmed


701-417-431; 731-953-965(Prelim)



701-362;731-707-710(Review)

Certain Seamless Carbon and Alloy SteelStandard, Line and Pressure Pipe fromArgentina, Brazil, Germany, and Italy Affirmative 6-0 Affirmed


701-355;731-659-660(Review)

Grain Oriented Silicon Electrical Steel from Italyand Japan Affirmative 2-2

Affirmed inpart

Remandedin part


701-364;731-711,713-716(Review)

Oil Country Tubular Goods from Argentina,Austria, Italy, Japan, Korea, Mexico, and Spain Affirmative 6-0, 4-2 Affirmed

Cogne Acciai Specialiv. US Slip Op. 05-122 9/12/05 Restani

731-770-775(Review)

Stainless Steel Wire Rod from Germany, Italy,Japan, Korea, Spain, Sweden, and Taiwan Affirmative 4-2 Affirmed

International ImagingMaterials, Inc. v.USITC Slip Op. 06-11 1/23/06 Eaton

731-1039-1040

Certain Wax and Wax/Resin Thermal TransferRibbons from France and Japan Negative 6-0 Remanded

Hynix SemiconductorInc. v. US 431F.Supp.2d 1302 4/13/06 Goldberg 701-431 DRAMS and DRAM Modules from Korea Affirmative 3-2 Remanded


DecidedJudgeRuling

ITC Inv.No. Product



701-355;731-659-660(Review)

Grain Oriented Silicon Electrical Steel from Italyand Japan Negative 5-1 Affirmed


731-566-570, 641


Cleo, Inc. v. US SlipOp. 2006-131 8/31/06 Barzilay 731-1070 Certain Tissue Paper Products from China Affirmative 3-3 Affirmed

Noviant Oy v. US 451F.Supp.2d 1267 9/12/06 Carman

731-1084-1087

Purified Carboxymethylcellulose from Finland,Mexico, Netherlands, and Sweden Affirmative 5-1 Affirmed

Connecticut SteelCorp. v. US Slip Op.2006-159 10/31/06 Carman

731-1099-1101(Prelim)

Carbon and Certain Alloy Steel Wire Rod fromGermany, Turkey, and the People's Republic ofChina Negative 6-0 Affirmed

Sichuan ChanghongElectric Co. v. US 466F.Supp.2d 1323 11/15/06 Eaton 731-1034 Certain Color Television Receivers from China Affirmative 5-0 Remanded

Hynix SemiconductorInc. v. US Slip Op. 06-177 12/7/06 Goldberg 701-431 DRAMS and DRAM Modules from Korea Affirmative 3-2 Affirmed


701-381-382; 731-797-804 Stainless Steel Sheet and Strip Negative 4-2 Affirmed


701-417-431; 731-953-965(Prelim)

Carbon and Alloy Steel Wire Rod from Brazil,Canada, Egypt, Germany, Indonesia, Mexico,Moldova, South Africa, Trinidad and Tobago,Ukraine, and Venezuela Negative 5-0

Celanese ChemicalsLtd. v. US Slip Op. 07-16 1/29/07 Ridgway

731-1088(Prelim) Polyvinyl Alcohol from Taiwan Negative 3-2 Remanded

Committee for FairBeam Imports v. US477 F.Supp.2d 1313 3/8/07 Tsoucalas

701-401;731-853-854(Review) Structural Steel Beams from Japan and Korea Negative 5-1 Affirmed


DecidedJudgeRuling

ITC Inv.No. Product


Tropicana Products,Inc. v. US 484F.Supp.2d 1330 4/12/07 Restani 731-1089 Certain Orange Juice from Brazil Affirmative 3-3 Remanded

Mittal Steel Point Lisas,Ltd. v. US 495F.Supp.2d 1374 7/6/07 Aquilino 731-961

Carbon and Certain Alloy Steel Wire Rod fromTrinidad and Tobago Negative 3-2 Affirmed

Nevinnomysskiy Azotv. US Slip Op. 07-130 8/28/07 Barzilay

731-340E, H(SecondReview) Solid Urea from Russia and Ukraine Affirmative 3-3 Remanded

Tropicana Products,Inc. v. US Slip Op. 07-141 9/19/07 Restani 731-1089 Certain Orange Juice from Brazil Affirmative 4-2 Remanded

Wieland Werke AG v.US 525 F.Supp.2d1353 11/7/07 Wallach

701-269;731-311-314, 317(SecondReview)

Brass Sheet and Strip from Brazil, Canada,France, Germany, Italy, and Japan Affirmative 6-0 Affirmed

Consolidated Fibers,Inc. v. US 535F.Supp.2d 1345 1/10/08 Gordon

731-825-826(Review)


Mittal Steel Roman v.US Slip Op. 08-03 1/11/08 Aquilino

731-846-850(Review)

Carbon and Alloy Seemless Standard, Line,and Pressure Pipe from the Czech Republic,Japan, Mexico, Romania and South Africa Affirmative 6-0, 3-3 Affirmed

Bratsk AluminumSmelter v. US 533F.Supp.2d 1348 1/15/08 Tsoucalas 731-991 Silicon Metal from Russia Afirmative 3-2 Affirmed

Tropicana Products,Inc. v. US Slip Op. 08-17 2/5/08 Restani 731-1089 Certain Orange Juice from Brazil Affirmative 4-2 Affirmed

Diamond SawbladesManufacturersCoalition v. US SlipOp. 08-18 2/6/08 Musgrave

731-1092-1093

Diamond Sawblades and Parts Thereof fromChina and Korea Negative 4-2 Remanded


DecidedJudgeRuling

ITC Inv.No. Product


Navneet Publications(India) Ltd. V. US SlipOp. 08-22 2/26/08 Eaton

701-442-443; 731-1095-1097

Certain Lined Paper School Supplies fromChina, India, and Indonesia Affirmative 3-3 Affirmed

Globe Metallurgical,Inc. v. US 547F.Supp.2d 1371 3/19/08 Tsoucalas

731-471(SecondReview) Silicon Metal From Brazil Negative 6-0 Affirmed


731-340E, H(SecondReview) Solid Urea from Russia and Ukraine Affirmative 4-2

Nucor Corp. v. US SlipOp. 08-74 7/9/08 Tsoucalas

AA 1921-197; 701-TA-319-320, 325-327, 348,350; 731-TA-573-574, 576,578, 582-587, 612,and 614-618(SecondReview)

Certain Carbon Steel Products From Australia,Belgium, Brazil, Canada, Finland, France,Germany, Japan, Korea, Mexico, Poland,Romania, Spain, Sweden, Taiwan, and theUnited Kingdom Negative 6-0 Affirmed

Consolidated Fibers,Inc. v. US Slip Op. 08-80 7/22/08 Gordon

731-825-826(Review)



LISTING OF DECISIONS BY DECIDING JUDGE

REVIEWING USITC AD/CVD DETERMINATIONS



DecidedJudgeRuling

ITC Inv.No. Product

ITCDecision ITC Vote Affirmances Remands


731-238(Prelim) 12 volt motorcycle batteries from Japan Negative 5-0 Remanded

Keyes Fibre Co. v. US682 F.Supp. 583 3/16/88 Aquilino 731-201 Egg filler flats from Canada Negative 5-0 RemandedYuasa-General BatteryCorp. v. US 688F.Supp. 1551 7/12/88 Aquilino

731-238(Prelim) 12 volt motorcycle batteries from Japan Negative 6-0 Reversed

Keyes Fibre Co. v. US691 F.Supp. 376 7/22/88 Aquilino 731-201 Egg filler flats from Canada Negative 4-2 RemandedRoses, Inc. v. US 720F.Supp. 180 8/18/89 Aquilino 731-148 Fresh cut roses from Colombia Negative 3-1 Affirmed

MBL (USA) andMitsubishi Belting Ltd.V. US 733 F.Supp. 379 3/14/90 Aquilino

701-293-295, 731-412-419

Industrial belts from Israel, Italy, Japan,Singapore, the Republic of Korea, Taiwan, theUK, and West Germany Affirmative 3-3

Summaryjudgmentpartially

dismissed,partiallygranted

United Engineeringand Forging v. US 779F.Supp. 1375 11/18/91 Aquilino

701-282;731-351,353

Certain Forged steel crankshafts from theFederal Republic of Germany and the UnitedKingdom Affirmative 4-1 Affirmed

Bando ChemicalIndustries, Ltd. v. US787 F.Supp. 224 3/5/92 Aquilino

701-293;731-412-419

Industrial belts from Israel, Italy, Japan,Singapore, the Republic of Korea, Taiwan, theUK, and West Germany Affirmative 3-3 Remanded

Bando ChemicalIndustries, Ltd. v. US17 CIT 798 8/6/93 Aquilino

701-293;731-412-419

Industrial belts from Israel, Italy, Japan,Singapore, the Republic of Korea, Taiwan, theUK, and West Germany Affirmative 5-1 Affirmed

Makita Corp. v. US 974F.Supp. 770 7/8/97 Aquilino 731-571

Professional Electric Cutting andSanding/Grinding Tools from Japan Affirmative Various

Actiondismissed

Co-Steel Raritan, Inc.v. US 244 F.Supp.2d1349 6/20/02 Aquilino

701-417-431; 731-953-965(Prelim)



DecidedJudgeRuling

ITC Inv.No. Product



701-417-431; 731-953-965(Prelim)

Carbon and Alloy Steel Wire Rod from Brazil,Canada, Egypt, Germany, Indonesia, Mexico,Moldova, South Africa, Trinidad and Tobago,Ukraine, and Venezuela Affirmative 6-0 Affirmed

Olin Corp.-BrassGroup v. US Slip Op.04-04 1/9/04 Aquilino

701-269-270; 731-311-317,379-380(Review)

Brass Sheet and Strip from Brazil, Canada,France, Germany, Italy, Japan, Korea, theNetherlands, and Sweden Negative 4-2 Affirmed

Caribbean Ispat Ltd. v.US 366 F.Supp.2d1300 3/22/05 Aquilino

701-417-421; 731-953-963

Carbon and Certain Alloy Steel Wire Rod fromBrazil, Canada, Germany, Indonesia, Mexico,Moldova, Trinidad and Tobago, and Ukraine Affirmative 5-0 Affirmed

Remanded[by CAFC]


701-417-431; 731-953-965(Prelim)



701-417-431; 731-953-965(Prelim)

Carbon and Alloy Steel Wire Rod from Brazil,Canada, Egypt, Germany, Indonesia, Mexico,Moldova, South Africa, Trinidad and Tobago,Ukraine, and Venezuela Negative 5-0

Mittal Steel Point Lisas,Ltd. v. US 495F.Supp.2d 1374 7/6/07 Aquilino 731-961

Carbon and Certain Alloy Steel Wire Rod fromTrinidad and Tobago Negative 3-2 Affirmed

Mittal Steel Roman v.US Slip Op. 08-03 1/11/08 Aquilino

731-846-850(Review)

Carbon and Alloy Seemless Standard, Line,and Pressure Pipe from the Czech Republic,Japan, Mexico, Romania and South Africa Affirmative 6-0, 3-3 Affirmed

USEC Inc. v. US 132F.Supp.2d 1 1/24/01 Barzilay 731-539 Uranium from Kazakhstan Negative 3-0 AffirmedTitanium Metals Corp.v. US 155 F.Supp.2d750 6/22/01 Barzilay

731-161(Review) Titanium Sponge from Japan Negative 3-0 Affirmed


DecidedJudgeRuling

ITC Inv.No. Product


Committee of DomesticSteel Wire Rope &Specialty Cable Mfrs.v. US 201 F.Supp.2d1287 4/5/02 Barzilay

731-868-869

Steel Wire Rope from India and the People'sRepublic of China Negative 6-0 Affirmed

Committee for FairBeam Imports v. USSlip Op. 03-73 6/27/03 Barzilay

731-935-936, 938-942

Structural Steel Beams from China, Germany,Italy, Luxembourg, Russia, South Africa, Spainand Taiwan Negative 4-1 Affirmed

Cleo, Inc. v. US SlipOp. 2006-131 8/31/06 Barzilay 731-1070 Certain Tissue Paper Products from China Affirmative 3-3 Affirmed


731-340E, H(SecondReview) Solid Urea from Russia and Ukraine Affirmative 3-3 Remanded


731-340E, H(SecondReview) Solid Urea from Russia and Ukraine Affirmative 4-2

Budd Co. Ry. Div. v.US 507 F.Supp. 997 12/29/80 Boe

731-5 and6 (Prelim)

Rail Passenger Cars and parts thereof intendedfor use as original equipment in the UnitedStates from Italy and Japan Negative 5-0 Remanded

Freres v. US 6 CIT 42 7/18/83 Boe 731-44 Sorbitol from France Affirmative 4-2 RemandedFreres v. US 583F.Supp. 599 3/19/84 Boe 731-44 Sorbitol from France Affirmative 4-0, 3-1 AffirmedBingham & Taylor v.US 627 F.Supp. 793 2/14/86 Carman

701-249(Prelim) Iron construction castings from Brazil Negative 3-2 Remanded

Kenda RubberIndustrial Co. Ltd v. US630 F. Supp. 354 2/24/86 Carman 731-166 Bicycle Tires and Tubes from Taiwan Affirmative 5-0 Affirmed

Kokusai Electric Co. v.US 632 F. Supp 23 3/14/86 Carman 731-163

Certain cell-site radio apparatus andsubassemblies thereof from Japan Affirmative 4-0 Affirmed

Hercules Inc. v. US673 F. Supp. 454 10/20/87 Carman

731-96;701-190 Nitrocellulose from France Affirmative 2-1 Affirmed

Empire Plow Co. v. US675 F. Sup. 1348 11/18/87 Carman 701-223 Agricultural tillage tools from Brazil Negative 3-2 Affirmed


DecidedJudgeRuling

ITC Inv.No. Product


Wells Mfg. Co. v. US677 F.Supp. 1239 12/8/87 Carman

701-208(Prelim) Iron bars from Brazil Negative 4-0 Affirmed

Copperweld Corp. v.US 682 F.Supp. 552 2/24/88 Carman 731-254

Heavy-walled rectangular welded carbon steelpipes and tubes from Canada Negative 4-0 Affirmed

Chaparral Steel Co. v.US 698 F.Supp. 254 9/28/88 Carman 731-234

Carbon steel angles, shapes, and sections fromNorway Negative 4-1 Remanded

Mitsubishi ElectricCopr v. US 700 F.Supp 538 10/31/88 Carman 731-207

Cellular Mobile Telephones and assembliesthereof from Japan Affirmative 4-1 Remanded

Borlem S.A.EmpreedimentosIndustriais v. US 710F.Supp. 797 3/22/89 Carman 731-335 Tubeless steel disk wheels from Brazil Affirmative 4-1 RemandedSandvik AB v. US 721F.Supp. 1322 9/14/89 Carman 731-354 Stainless steel pipes and tubes from Sweden Affirmative 4-1 AffirmedTrent Tube Division v.US 741 F.Supp. 921 6/20/90 Carman 731-354 Stainless steel pipes and tubes from Sweden Negative 3-2

Remandedin part

Trent Tube Division v.US 752 F.Supp. 468 11/27/90 Carman 731-354 Stainless steel pipes and tubes from Sweden Affirmative 3-2 AffirmedBorlem S.A.EmpreedimentosIndustriais v. US 786F.Supp. 1031 3/3/92 Carman 731-335 Tubeless steel disk wheels from Brazil Negative 4-1 AffirmedCemex v. US 790F.Supp. 290 4/7/92 Carman 731-451

Gray portland cement and cement clinker fromMexico Affirmative 2-1 Affirmed

Calabrian Corp v.USITC 794 F. Supp.377 5/13/92 Carman

701-303;731-465-468(Prelim)

Certain sodium sulfur chemical compoundsfrom West Germany, China, Turkey, and theUnited Kingdom Negative Various Dismissed


731-448-450

Sweaters wholly or in chief weight of man-madefiber from Hong Kong, the Republic of Korea,and Taiwan Affirmative 2-1 Remanded

Texas Crushed StoneCo. v. US 822 F.Supp.773 5/25/93 Carman

731-562(Prelim) Crushed Limestone from Mexico Negative 5-0 Affirmed

Feldspar Corp. v. US825 F.Supp. 1095 6/23/93 Carman 731-525 Nepheline Syenite from Canada Negative 6-0 Dismissed


DecidedJudgeRuling

ITC Inv.No. Product



731-448-450

Sweaters wholly or in chief weight of man-madefiber from Hong Kong, the Republic of Korea,and Taiwan Negative 6-0 Affirmed

Saarstahl AG v. US858 F.Supp 196 6/24/94 Carman

701-314-317; 731-552-555

Certain Hot-Rolled Lead and Bismuth CarbonSteel Products from Brazil, France, Germany,and the United Kingdom Negative 5-1 Affirmed

Ranchers-CattlemenAction LegalFoundation v. US 74F.Supp.2d 1353 11/5/99 Carman

701-386;731-812-813(Prelim) Live Cattle from Canada and Mexico Negative 5-1 Affirmed

Indorama Chemicals(Thailand) Ltd. V.USITC Slip Op. 02-1-4 9/4/02 Carman

731-703,705(Review)

Furfuryl Alcohol from the People's Republic ofChina and Thailand Affirmative 6-0 Affirmed

Nucor Corp. v. US 318F.Supp. 2d 1207 2/19/04 Carman

731-965,971-972,979, 981

Certain Cold-Rolled Steel Products fromAustralia, India, Japan, Sweden, and Thailand Negative 4-1 Affirmed

Noviant Oy v. US 451F.Supp.2d 1267 9/12/06 Carman

731-1084-1087

Purified Carboxymethylcellulose from Finland,Mexico, Netherlands, and Sweden Affirmative 5-1 Affirmed

Connecticut SteelCorp. v. US Slip Op.2006-159 10/31/06 Carman

731-1099-1101(Prelim)

Carbon and Certain Alloy Steel Wire Rod fromGermany, Turkey, and the People's Republic ofChina Negative 6-0 Affirmed

American Lamb Co. v.US 611 F.Supp. 979 5/31/85 DiCarlo

701-214(Prelim) Lamb meat from New Zealand Negative 4-2 Remanded

Luciano PisoniFabbrica AccessoriInstrumenti Musicali v.US 640 F. Supp. 255 6/12/85 DiCarlo 731-152 Pads for woodwind instrument keys from Italy Affirmative 3-2

Remandedto

CommercePhilipp Brothers, Inc. v.US 640 F.Supp. 1340 7/17/86 DiCarlo 731-161 Titanium Sponge from Japan Affirmative 4-1 Affirmed

Hyundai Pipe Co. v.USTIC 670 F.Supp.357 2/23/87 DiCarlo

731-131-132, 138

Certain welded carbon steel pipes from theRepublic of Korea and Taiwan, Certainrectangular welded carbon steel pipes andtubes from the Republic of Korea Affirmative

4-0, 3-1,3-1, 4-0 Dismissed


DecidedJudgeRuling

ITC Inv.No. Product


National PorkProducers Council v.US 661 F.Supp. 633 5/28/87 DiCarlo 701-224 Live swine and pork from Canada Negative 2-1 AffirmedAlberta PorkProducers' Mktg. Bd. v.US 669 F.Supp. 445 8/7/87 DiCarlo 701-224 Live swine and pork from Canada Affirmative 2-1 RemandedAlberta PorkProducers' Mktg. Bd. v.US 683 F.Supp. 1398 3/22/88 DiCarlo 701-224 Live swine and pork from Canada Affirmative 2-1 AffirmedMaverick Tube Corp. v.US 687 F. Supp. 1569 5/24/88 DiCarlo

731-375(Prelim) Certain line pipes and tubes from Canada Negative 4-1 Remanded

National Ass'n of MirrorMfrs. v. US 696F.Supp. 642 8/25/88 DiCarlo

731-320-325

Certain unfinished mirrors from Belgium,Federal Republic of Germany, Italy, Japan,Portugal, and the United Kingdom Negative 5-0, 4-1 Affirmed

Negev Phosphates v.US DOC and USITC699 F.Supp. 938 11/9/88 DiCarlo

701-286;731-365-366 Industrial phophoric acid from Belgium Affirmative 3-2 Affirmed

Citrosuco Paulista v.US 704 F.Supp. 1075 12/30/88 DiCarlo 731-326 Frozen concentrated orange juice from Brazil Affirmative 5-1 RemandedCitrosuco Paulista v.US 706 F.Supp. 1333 3/13/89 DiCarlo 731-326 Frozen concentrated orange juice from Brazil Affirmative 5-1 Affirmed

Hannibal Industries v.US 710 F.Supp. 332 3/17/89 DiCarlo 731-349

Certain welded carbon steel pipes and tubesfrom Taiwan Negative 3-2 Remanded

LMI-La MetalliIndustriale v. US 712F. Supp 959 4/11/89 DiCarlo

701-270;731-313-314, 316-317


Granges MetallverkenAB v. US 716 F. Supp.17 6/7/89 DiCarlo

701-270;731-313-314, 316-317

Certain brass sheet and strip from France, Italy,Sweden, and West Germany Affirmative 3-2 Dismissed

Wieland Werke AG v.US 718 F.Supp. 50 7/10/89 DiCarlo

701-270;731-313-314, 316-317



731-379-380

Certain brass sheet and strip from Japan andthe Netherlands Affirmative 3-3 Remanded


DecidedJudgeRuling

ITC Inv.No. Product


Cambridge LeeIndustries v. US 728F.Supp. 748 12/21/89 DiCarlo

731-379-380

Certain brass sheet and strip from Japan andthe Netherlands Affirmative 3-3 Affirmed

Remandedin part


731-379-380

Certain brass sheet and strip from Japan andthe Netherlands Affirmative 4-2 Dismissed

Torrington Co. v. US790 F.Supp. 1161 4/3/92 DiCarlo

701-307;731-498-511(Prelim)

Ball Bearings, Mounted or Unmounted andParts Thereof, from Argentina, Austria, Brazil,Canada, Hong Kong, Hungary, Mexico, thePeople's Republic of China, Poland, theRepublic of Korea, Spain, Taiwan, Turkey, andYugoslavia Negative 3-1 Affirmed

Connecticut SteelCorp. v. US 852F.Supp. 1061 4/22/94 DiCarlo

731-649(Prelim) Steel Wire Rod from Trinidad and Tobago Negative 5-1 Affirmed

Grupo IndustrialCamesa v. U.S. 853 F.Supp. 440 5/18/94 DiCarlo

731-546-547

Steel Wire Rope from the Republic of Koreaand Mexico Affirmative 3-3 Affirmed


731-566-570, 641


Nippon Steel Corp. v.US Slip Op. 02-153 12/24/02 Eaton

701-355;731-659-660(Review)


Committee for FairCoke Trade v. US 27CIT 774 5/20/03 Eaton

731-951-952(Prelim) Blast Furnace Coke from China and Japan Negative 3-2 Remanded


731-566-570, 641



701-355;731-659-660(Review)



731-566-570, 641



DecidedJudgeRuling

ITC Inv.No. Product


Committee for FairCoke Trade v. US SlipOp. 04-68 6/10/04 Eaton

731-951-952(Prelim) Blast Furnace Coke from China and Japan Negative 2-1 Affirmed

American BearingManufacturersAssociation v. US 350F.Supp.2d 1100 9/16/04 Eaton 731-989 Ball Bearings from China Negative 4-0 Affirmed


701-355;731-659-660(Review)

Grain Oriented Silicon Electrical Steel from Italyand Japan Affirmative 2-2

Affirmed inpart

Remandedin part

International ImagingMaterials, Inc. v.USITC Slip Op. 06-11 1/23/06 Eaton

731-1039-1040

Certain Wax and Wax/Resin Thermal TransferRibbons from France and Japan Negative 6-0 Remanded


701-355;731-659-660(Review)

Grain Oriented Silicon Electrical Steel from Italyand Japan Negative 5-1 Affirmed


731-566-570, 641


Sichuan ChanghongElectric Co. v. US 466F.Supp.2d 1323 11/15/06 Eaton 731-1034 Certain Color Television Receivers from China Affirmative 5-0 Remanded

Navneet Publications(India) Ltd. V. US SlipOp. 08-22 2/26/08 Eaton

701-442-443; 731-1095-1097

Certain Lined Paper School Supplies fromChina, India, and Indonesia Affirmative 3-3 Affirmed

Armco Inc. v. US 570F.Supp. 51 8/22/83 Ford 731-26 Certain Steel Wire Nails from Korea Negative 3-2 AffirmedChr. Bjelland SeafoodsA/S v. US 16 CIT 945 10/23/92 Goldberg

701-302;731-454 Fresh and chilled Atlantic salmon from Norway Affirmative 3-1 Reversed Remanded

Tianjin MachineryImport and ExportCorp. v. US 16 CIT1020 12/1/92 Goldberg 731-457

Heavy Forged Hand Tools from the People'sRepublic of China Affirmative 4-0 Remanded


High-Information Content Flat Panel Displaysand Subassemblies Thereof from Japan Affirmative 3-1 Reversed Remanded


DecidedJudgeRuling

ITC Inv.No. Product



Gray portland cement and cement clinker fromJapan Affirmative 3-1

Affirmed inpart

Remandedin part

Tianjin MachineryImport and ExportCorp. v. US 820F.Supp. 1456 4/27/93 Goldberg 731-457

Heavy Forged Hand Tools from the People'sRepublic of China Affirmative 4-0 Affirmed


High-Information Content Flat Panel Displaysand Subassemblies Thereof from Japan

Affirmative/Negative 3-3, 4-2 Affirmed


701-302;731-454 Fresh Chilled Atlantic Salmon from Norway Affirmative 3-3 Affirmed


Gray portland cement and cement clinker fromJapan Affirmative 4-2 Affirmed

Hyundai ElectronicsIndustries Co. v.USITC 20 CIT 805 7/5/96 Goldberg 731-556

Drams of one Megabit and Above from theRepublic of Korea Affirmative 3-3 Remanded

Mukand v. US 937 f.Supp 910 8/2/96 Goldberg 731-638 Stainless Steel Wire Rod from India Affirmative 4-2 AffirmedBIC Corp. v. US 964F.Supp. 391 4/24/97 Goldberg

731-700-701 Disposable Lighters from China and Thailand Negative 4-2 Affirmed

Hyundai ElectronicsIndustries Co. v.USITC CIT Slip Op.97-53 5/2/97 Goldberg 731-556

Drams of one Megabit and Above from theRepublic of Korea Affirmative 3-1 Affirmed

Asociacion deProductores deSalmon y Trucha deChile v. USITC SlipOp. 99-58 7/2/99 Goldberg 731-768 Fresh Atlantic Salmon from Chile Affirmative 2-1 RemandedAsociacion deProductores deSalmon y Trucha deChile v. USITC 24 CIT654 7/27/00 Goldberg 731-768 Fresh Atlantic Salmon from Chile Affirmative 5-1 Remanded


DecidedJudgeRuling

ITC Inv.No. Product


Asociacion deProductores deSalmon y Trucha deChile v. USITC 24 CIT969 9/8/00 Goldberg 731-768 Fresh Atlantic Salmon from Chile Affirmative 5-1 RemandedAsociacion deProductores deSalmon y Trucha deChile v. USITC 180F.Supp.2d 1360 1/9/02 Goldberg 731-768 Fresh Atlantic Salmon from Chile Affirmative 5-1 Affirmed

Ugine-Savoie Imphy v.US Slip Op. 02-79 7/31/02 Goldberg

701-178;731-636-638(Review)

Stainless Steel Wire Rod from Brazil, France,India, and Spain Affirmative 5-1 Affirmed


701-393-396; 731-829-840

Certain Cold-Rolled Steel Products fromArgentina, Brazil, Japan, Russia, South Africa,and Thailand Negative 5-1 Remanded


701-393-396; 731-829-840

Certain Cold-Rolled Steel Products fromArgentina, Brazil, Japan, Russia, South Africa,and Thailand Negative 5-1 Affirmed

Nitrogen Solutions FairTrade Committee v.US 358 F.Supp.2d1314 1/31/05 Goldberg

731-1006,1008-1009

Urea Ammonium Nitrate Solutions fromBelarus, Russia, and Ukraine Negative 4-0 Affirmed

Hynix SemiconductorInc. v. US 431F.Supp.2d 1302 4/13/06 Goldberg 701-431 DRAMS and DRAM Modules from Korea Affirmative 3-2 RemandedHynix SemiconductorInc. v. US Slip Op. 06-177 12/7/06 Goldberg 701-431 DRAMS and DRAM Modules from Korea Affirmative 3-2 AffirmedConsolidated Fibers,Inc. v. US 535F.Supp.2d 1345 1/10/08 Gordon

731-825-826(Review)


Consolidated Fibers,Inc. v. US Slip Op. 08-80 7/22/08 Gordon

731-825-826(Review)


American Spring WireCorp (and Armco Inc.)v. US 590 F.Supp.1273 7/11/84 Maletz 731-26 Certain Steel Wire Nails from Korea Negative 3-2 Affirmed


DecidedJudgeRuling

ITC Inv.No. Product


Sony Corporation ofAmerica v. US 712F.Supp. 978 4/26/89 Musgrave

731-367-370

Color Picture Tubes from Canada, Japan, theRepublic of Korea, and Singapore Affirmative 5-1 Affirmed


701-287;731-378

Certain Electrical Conductor Aluminum RedrawRod from Venezuela Affirmative 4-0 Vacated

Remanded[by CAFC]

Camargo CorreaMetais v. US 17 CIT 35 1/22/93 Musgrave 731-471 Silicon Metal From Brazil Affirmative 4-0 AffirmedSuramericana deAleaciones Laminidas,C.A. v. US 818 F.Supp.348 3/15/93 Musgrave

701-287;731-378

Certain Electrical Conductor Aluminum RedrawRod from Venezuela Affirmative 4-0 Remanded


701-287;731-378

Certain Electrical Conductor Aluminum RedrawRod from Venezuela Negative 4-2 Affirmed

Aristech ChemicalCorp. v. US Slip Op.96-51 3/11/96 Musgrave

701-358;731-667(Prelim) Phthalic Anhydride from Mexico Negative 5-1 Affirmed

Sensient TechnologiesCorp v. US Slip Op.04-115 9/10/04 Musgrave

701-433;731-1029(Prelim) Allura Red Coloring from India Negative 4-0 Affirmed

Diamond SawbladesManufacturersCoalition v. US SlipOp. 08-18 2/6/08 Musgrave

731-1092-1093

Diamond Sawblades and Parts Thereof fromChina and Korea Negative 4-2 Remanded

British Steel Corp. v.US 593 F.Supp. 405 8/6/84 Newman 701-196 Stainless Steel Plate from the United Kingdom Affirmative 3-0 DismissedJeannette Sheet GlassCorp v. US 607F.Supp. 123 3/22/85 Newman

731-127-129(Prelim)

Thin sheet glass from Switzerland, Belgium andthe Federal Republic of Germany Negative 3-1 Remanded


731-127-129(Prelim)

Thin sheet glass from Switzerland, Belgium andthe Federal Republic of Germany Negative 5-0 Affirmed

Gerald Metals Inc v.US 937 F. Supp. 930 8/21/96 Pogue

731-696-698 Magnesium from China, Russia, and Ukraine Affirmative 3-3 Affirmed


DecidedJudgeRuling

ITC Inv.No. Product


Guangxi Gitric Import &Export Corp v. U.S.955 F.Supp. 1477 1/8/97 Pogue

731-726-727, 729

Polyvinyl Alcohol from China, Japan, andTaiwan Affirmative 3-3 Dismissed

Gerald Metals Inc v.US 8 F. Supp.2d 861 4/28/98 Pogue

731-696-698 Magnesium from China, Russia, and Ukraine Affirmative 3-3

Vacatedprevious Remanded

Goss Graphics SystemInc. v. US 33F.Supp.2d 1082 10/16/98 Pogue

731-736-737

Large Newspaper Printing Presses andComponents Thereof, Whether Assembled orUnassembled, from Germany and Japan Affirmative 5-0 Affirmed

Gerald Metals Inc v.US 27 F.Supp.2d 1351 10/20/98 Pogue

731-696-698 Magnesium from China, Russia, and Ukraine Negative 2-1 Affirmed

NEC Corp. v. US DOCand USITC 36F.Supp.2d 380 12/15/98 Pogue 731-750 Vector Supercomputers from Japan Affirmative 3-0 RemandedTaiwan SemiconductorIndustry Association v.US 59 F.Supp.2d 1324 6/30/99 Pogue

731-761-762

Static Random Access MemorySemiconductors from the Republic of Korea andTaiwan Affirmative 1-1 Remanded

NEC Corp. v. US DOCand USITC 83F.Supp.2d 1339 12/17/99 Pogue 731-750 Vector Supercomputers from Japan Affirmative 3-1 AffirmedTaiwan SemiconductorIndustry Association v.US 93 F.Supp.2d1283/105 F.Supp.2d1363 4/11/00 Pogue

731-761-762

Static Random Access MemorySemiconductors from the Republic of Korea andTaiwan Negative 4-1 Remanded

Taiwan SemiconductorIndustry Association v.US 118 F.Supp.2d1250 8/29/00 Pogue

731-761-762

Static Random Access MemorySemiconductors from the Republic of Korea andTaiwan Negative 4-1 Affirmed

Steel Authority of Indiav. US 146 F.Supp.2d900 5/22/01 Pogue

701-387-391; 731-816-821

Certain Cut to Length Steel Plate from France,India, Indonesia, Italy, Japan, and Korea Affirmative 6-0 Affirmed


701-267-268; 731-297-299,304-305(Review)

Certain Porcelain-on-Steel Cooking Ware fromChina, Taiwan, and Mexico and Top-of-the-Stove Stainless Steel Cooking Ware from Koreaand Taiwan Affirmative 3-3 Remanded


DecidedJudgeRuling

ITC Inv.No. Product



701-267-268; 731-297-299,304-305(Review)

Certain Porcelain-on-Steel Cooking Ware fromChina, Taiwan, and Mexico and Top-of-the-Stove Stainless Steel Cooking Ware from Koreaand Taiwan Affirmative 5-1 Affirmed


701-362;731-707-710(Review)

Certain Seamless Carbon and Alloy SteelStandard, Line and Pressure Pipe fromArgentina, Brazil, Germany, and Italy Affirmative 6-0 Remanded


701-362;731-707-710(Review)

Certain Seamless Carbon and Alloy SteelStandard, Line and Pressure Pipe fromArgentina, Brazil, Germany, and Italy Affirmative 6-0 Affirmed


701-364;731-711,713-716(Review)

Oil Country Tubular Goods from Argentina,Austria, Italy, Japan, Korea, Mexico, and Spain Affirmative 6-0, 4-2 Affirmed

Asahi Chemical Indus.Co. v. US 692 F.Supp.1376 7/25/88 Rao 731-1, 2 Spun acrylic yarn from Japan and Italy Affirmative 5-0 RemandedRhone Poulenc v. US592 F.Supp. 1318 7/19/84 Restani 731-25 Anhydrous Sodium Metasilicate from France Affirmative 5-0 AffirmedMaine Potato Councilv. US 613 F.Supp.1237 6/27/85 Restani 731-124 Certain Fresh Potatoes from Canada Negative 3-0 RemandedGifford-Hill Cement Co.v. US 615 F.Supp. 577 7/31/85 Restani

731-108-109 Portland Cement from Australia and Japan Negative 4-0 Affirmed

Lone Star Steel v. US650 F.Supp. 183 11/28/86 Restani 731-191

Oil Country Tubular Goods from Argentina,Brazil, the Republic of Korea, Mexico, andSpain Negative 5-0 Affirmed


Cold-rolled carbon steel sheet from Argentina,South Africa and Spain Negative 4-0, 3-1 Remanded

BMT Commodity Corp.v. US 667 F.Supp. 880 7/22/87 Restani 731-199 Certain dried salted codfish from Canada Affirmative 4-1 AffirmedUSX Corporation v.United States 682F.Supp. 60 3/15/88 Restani 731-175

Cold-rolled carbon steel plates and sheets fromArgentina Negative 4-1 Remanded


DecidedJudgeRuling

ITC Inv.No. Product


Algoma Steel Corp Ltdv. US 688 F.Supp. 639 6/8/88 Restani

731-276-277

Oil Country Tubular goods from Canada andTaiwan Affirmative 4-2 Affirmed


701-275-278; 731-327-333

Certain fresh cut flowers from Canada, Chile,Colombia, Costa Rica, Ecuador, Kenya, andMexico Affirmative 3-2 Remanded


Cold-rolled carbon steel plates and sheets fromArgentina Negative 4-1 Affirmed


701-275-278; 731-327-333

Certain fresh cut flowers from Canada, Chile,Colombia, Costa Rica, Ecuador, Kenya, andMexico Negative 5-0 Affirmed

Florex v. US 705 F.Supp. 582 1/6/89 Restani 731-333 Certain fresh cut flowers from Mexico Affirmative 3-2 AffirmedBrother Industries Ltdv. US 787 F.Supp.1454 3/12/92 Restani 731-483 Certain personal word processors from Japan Affirmative 4-0 Dismissed

Encon Industries v. US16 CIT 840 9/24/92 Restani 731-473

Certain Electric Fans From the People'sRepublic of China and Taiwan Affirmative 3-1 Affirmed

Holmes Products Corpv. US 16 CIT 1101 12/30/92 Restani 731-473

Certain Electric Fans From the People'sRepublic of China and Taiwan Affirmative 3-1 Remanded

General Motors Corp.v. USITC 827 F.Supp.774 7/12/93 Restani 731-522 Minivans from Japan Negative 4-2 Affirmed

R-M Industries v. US848 F.Supp. 204 3/18/94 Restani

701-318;731-560-561

Sulfanilic Acid from the Republic of Hungaryand India Negative 4-2 Remanded

R-M Industries v. US18 CIT 577 6/14/94 Restani

701-318;731-560-561

Sulfanilic Acid from the Republic of Hungaryand India

Affirmative/Negative 4-2; 4-2 Affirmed


DecidedJudgeRuling

ITC Inv.No. Product


United States SteelGroup v. US 873F.Supp. 673 12/30/94 Restani

701-319-332, 334,336-342,344, 347-353; 731-573-579,581-592,594-597,599-609,612-619

Certain Flat-Rolled Steel Products fromAustralia, Austria, Belgium, Brazil, Canada,Finland, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, Korea,Mexico, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Poland,Romania, Spain, Sweden, and the UnitedKingdom Negative 5-1; 4-2 Affirmed

Kern-Liebers USAv.US 19 cIT 87 1/27/95 Restani

701-319-332, 334,336-342,344, 347-353; 731-573-579,581-592,594-597,599-609,612-619

Certain Flat-Rolled Steel Products fromAustralia, Austria, Belgium, Brazil, Canada,Finland, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, Korea,Mexico, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Poland,Romania, Spain, Sweden, and the UnitedKingdom

Affirmative/Negative Various Affirmed


701-319-332, 334,336-342,344, 347-353; 731-573-579,581-592,594-597,599-609,612-619

Certain Flat-Rolled Steel Products fromAustralia, Austria, Belgium, Brazil, Canada,Finland, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, Korea,Mexico, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Poland,Romania, Spain, Sweden, and the UnitedKingdom Affirmative Various

Affirmed inpart

Remanded inpart


701-319-332, 334,336-342,344, 347-353; 731-573-579,581-592,594-597,599-609,612-619

Certain Flat-Rolled Steel Products fromAustralia, Austria, Belgium, Brazil, Canada,Finland, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, Korea,Mexico, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Poland,Romania, Spain, Sweden, and the UnitedKingdom Affirmative Various Affirmed


DecidedJudgeRuling

ITC Inv.No. Product


Acciai Speciali Terni v.US 19 CIT 1051 8/7/95 Restani

701-355;731-659-660

Grain Oriented Silicon Electrical Steel from Italyand Japan Affirmative 3-1, 5-0 Affirmed

Companhia Paulista v.US 20 CIT 473 4/15/96 Restani

731-671-674

Silicomanganese from Brazil, the People'sRepublic of China, Ukraine, and Venezuela Affirmative 3-3 Affirmed

Floral Trade Council v.US 20 CIT 595 5/17/96 Restani

731-684-685 Fresh Cut Roses from Colombia and Ecuador Negative 4-2 Affirmed

Ad Hoc Committee ofDomestic UraniumProduers v. US 162F.Supp.2d 649 8/14/01 Restani

731-539-C, E, andF(Review) Uranium from Russia, Ukraine, and Uzbekistan Negative 5-0 Affirmed

Far Eastern Textile Ltdv. USITC slip Op. 01-102 8/14/01 Restani

731-825-826


ALTX Inc. v. US 167F.Supp.2d 1353 9/19/01 Restani 731-859

Circular Seamless Stainless Steel HollowProducts from Japan Negative 4-2 Remanded





ALTX Inc. v. US 26 CIT709 7/12/02 Restani 731-859

Circular Seamless Stainless Steel HollowProducts from Japan Affirmative 3-3 Remanded


Tin and Chromium Coated Steel Sheet fromJapan Affirmative 4-2 Vacated

Usinor Industeel v. US26 CIT 1402 12/20/02 Restani


ALTX Inc. v. US SlipOp. 02-154 12/31/02 Restani 731-859

Circular Seamless Stainless Steel HollowProducts from Japan Negative 3-2 Affirmed


DecidedJudgeRuling

ITC Inv.No. Product


Corus Staal v. USITCSlip Op. 03-32 3/21/03 Restani

701-405-408; 731-899-904,906-908

Hot Rolled Steel Products from China, India,Indonesia, Kazakhstan, the Netherlands,Romania, South Africa, Taiwan, Thailand, andUkraine Affirmative 6-0 Affirmed


701-319;731-573(Review) Certain Cut to Length Steel Plate from Belgium Affirmative 4-0 Affirmed



Allied Mineral ProductsInc. v. US Slip Op. 04-139 11/12/04 Restani 731-1022 Refined Brown Aluminum Oxide from China Affirmative 5-0 Affirmed

Nippon Steel Corp. v.US Slip Op. 05-38 3/23/05 Restani 731-860

Tin and Chromium Coated Steel Sheet fromJapan Negative N/A Affirmed

Cogne Acciai Specialiv. US Slip Op. 05-122 9/12/05 Restani

731-770-775(Review)

Stainless Steel Wire Rod from Germany, Italy,Japan, Korea, Spain, Sweden, and Taiwan Affirmative 4-2 Affirmed

Tropicana Products,Inc. v. US 484F.Supp.2d 1330 4/12/07 Restani 731-1089 Certain Orange Juice from Brazil Affirmative 3-3 RemandedTropicana Products,Inc. v. US Slip Op. 07-141 9/19/07 Restani 731-1089 Certain Orange Juice from Brazil Affirmative 4-2 RemandedTropicana Products,Inc. v. US Slip Op. 08-17 2/5/08 Restani 731-1089 Certain Orange Juice from Brazil Affirmative 4-2 AffirmedBabcock & Wilcox Co.v. US 521 F.Supp. 479 8/20/81 Richardson

731-15(Prelim) Pipes and tubes or iron or steel from Japan Negative 4-1 Remanded

Committee for FairlyTraded VenezuelanCement v. US 279F.Supp.2d 1314 7/28/03 Ridgway

731-451,461, 519(Review)

Gray Portland Cement and Cement Clinkerfrom Japan, Mexico, and Venezuela Negative 5-0 Affirmed

Celanese ChemicalsLtd. v. US Slip Op. 07-16 1/29/07 Ridgway

731-1088(Prelim) Polyvinyl Alcohol from Taiwan Negative 3-2 Remanded


DecidedJudgeRuling

ITC Inv.No. Product


Marsuda-RodgersInternational v. US 719F. Supp. 1092 7/26/89 Tsoucalas

731-341,344, 345

Tapered Roller Bearings from Hungary andRomania Affirmative 3-2 Reversed Remanded

Asahi Chemical Indus.Co. v. US 727 F.Supp.625 12/9/89 Tsoucalas 731-1, 2 Spun acrylic yarn from Japan and Italy Affirmative 5-0 AffirmedMarsuda-RodgersInternational v. US 734F.Supp. 1019 4/3/90 Tsoucalas

731-341,344, 345

Tapered Roller Bearings from Hungary andRomania Negative 6-0 Affirmed

Torrington Co. v. US747 F.Supp. 744 9/11/90 Tsoucalas

731-391-399


Minebea Co. Ltd andNMB Corp. v. US 794F. Supp. 1161 7/6/92 Tsoucalas

731-391-399


Committee of DomesticSteel Wire Rope &Specialty Cable Mfrs.v. US 808 F.Supp. 376 3/30/93 Tsoucalas

701-305;731-478,480-482

Steel Wire Rope from Chile, India, the People'sRepublic of China, Taiwan, and Thailand Negative 4-0 Affirmed

Stalexport v. US 890F.Supp. 1053 5/23/95 Tsoucalas

701-319-332, 334,336-342,344, 347-353; 731-573-579,581-592,594-597,599-609,612-619

Certain Flat-Rolled Carbon Steel Products fromArgentina, Australia, Austria, Belgium, Brazil,Canada, Finland, France, Germany, Italy,Japan, Korea, Mexico, the Netherlands, NewZealand, Poland, Romania, Spain, Sweden,and the United Kingdom Negative Various Affirmed


DecidedJudgeRuling

ITC Inv.No. Product


Timken Co. v. US 913F.Supp. 580 1/3/96 Tsoucalas 731-572

Certain Special Quality Carbon and Alloy Hot-Rolled Steel Bars and Rods and SemifinishedProducts Thereof from Brazil Negative 6-0 Affirmed


AA-1921-143; 731-343(Review)



AA1921-143; 731-341, 343-345, 391,399(Review)

Certain Bearings from China, France, Germany,Hungary, Italy, Japan, Romania, Singapore,Sweden, and the United Kingdom Affirmative 4-1 Remanded


731-391,394, 397,399



AA-1921-143; 731-343(Review)

Certain Bearings from China, France, Germany,Hungary, Italy, Japan, Romania, Singapore,Sweden, and the United Kingdom Negative 2-1 Affirmed

Bratsk AluminumSmelter v. US 28 CIT955 6/22/04 Tsoucalas 731-991 Silicon Metal from Russia Affirmative 3-0 Remanded


AA1921-143; 731-341, 343-345. 391,399(Review)


Timken U.S. Corp. v.US Slip Op. 04-98 8/9/04 Tsoucalas

731-391,394, 397,399



DecidedJudgeRuling

ITC Inv.No. Product


Committee for FairBeam Imports v. US477 F.Supp.2d 1313 3/8/07 Tsoucalas

701-401;731-853-854(Review) Structural Steel Beams from Japan and Korea Negative 5-1 Affirmed

Bratsk AluminumSmelter v. US 533F.Supp.2d 1348 1/15/08 Tsoucalas 731-991 Silicon Metal from Russia Afirmative 3-2 AffirmedGlobe Metallurgical,Inc. v. US 547F.Supp.2d 1371 3/19/08 Tsoucalas

731-471(SecondReview) Silicon Metal From Brazil Negative 6-0 Affirmed

Nucor Corp. v. US SlipOp. 08-74 7/9/08 Tsoucalas

AA 1921-197; 701-TA-319-320, 325-327, 348,350; 731-TA-573-574, 576,578, 582-587, 612,and 614-618(SecondReview)

Certain Carbon Steel Products From Australia,Belgium, Brazil, Canada, Finland, France,Germany, Japan, Korea, Mexico, Poland,Romania, Spain, Sweden, Taiwan, and theUnited Kingdom Negative 6-0 Affirmed

Dastech InternationalInc. v. USITC 963F.Supp. 1220 5/1/97 Wallach 731-653

Sebacic Acid from the People's Republic ofChina Affirmative 4-2 Affirmed

Coalition for thePreservation ofAmerican Brake Drum& Rotor AftermarketMfrs v. US 15F.Supp.2d 918 7/13/98 Wallach 731-744 Certain Brake Drums and Rotors from China Negative 4-0 Affirmed


701-376-377, 379;731-788-793

Certain Stainless Steel Plate from Belgium,Canada, Italy, Korea, South Africa, and Taiwan Negative 4-2 Affirmed

Acciai Speciali Terni v.US 118 F. Supp. 2d1298 10/2/00 Wallach

701-376-379; 731-788-793 Stainless Steel Plate from the United Kingdom Affirmative 4-2 Affirmed


DecidedJudgeRuling

ITC Inv.No. Product


Usinor, Beautour v. US26 CIT 767 7/19/02 Wallach

701-319-332; 731-573-579 Flat-rolled Carbon Steel Products Affirmative 4-2 Remanded

Usinor, Beautour v. US342 F. Supp. 2d 1267 6/9/04 Wallach

701-319-332; 731-573-579 Flat-rolled Carbon Steel Products Affirmative 4-0 Affirmed


701-381-382; 731-797-804 Stainless Steel Sheet and Strip Negative 4-2 Affirmed

Wieland Werke AG v.US 525 F.Supp.2d1353 11/7/07 Wallach

701-269;731-311-314, 317(SecondReview)

Brass Sheet and Strip from Brazil, Canada,France, Germany, Italy, and Japan Affirmative 6-0 Affirmed

Atlantic Sugar Ltd. v.US 519 F.Supp. 916 7/8/81 Watson 731-3 Sugars and Sirups from Canada Affirmative 4-1 RemandedAtlantic Sugar Ltd. v.US 2 CIT 295 12/28/81 Watson 731-3 Sugars and Sirups from Canada Affirmative 2-1 RemandedAtlantic Sugar Ltd. v.US 553 F.Supp. 1055 12/14/82 Watson 731-3 Sugars and Sirups from Canada Affirmative 4-1 Remanded

Atlantic Sugar Ltd. v.US 573 F.Supp. 1142 10/14/83 Watson 731-3 Sugars and Sirups from Canada Affirmative 4-1 Vacated ITC

Republic Steel Corp. v.US 591 F.Supp. 640 7/11/84 Watson

701-118,126,135, 156,161, 163,172(Prelim)

Carbon Steel Structural Shapes/Hot-rolledCarbon Steel Bar/Cold-formed Carbon SteelBar/ Hot-rolled Carbon Steel Plate/ Negative Various Remanded



Armstrong Rubber Co.v. US 614 F.Supp.1252 8/8/85 Watson

731-200(Prelim)

Radial-ply tires for passenger cars from theRepublic of Korea Negative 5-0 Reversed Remanded

ICC Industries v. US632 F. Supp. 36 3/19/86 Watson 731-125

Potassium permanganate from the People'sRepublic of China Affirmative 4-0 Affirmed


DecidedJudgeRuling

ITC Inv.No. Product


Fundicao Tupy v. US652 F. Supp. 1538 1/13/87 Watson 731-278

Certain malleable cast-iron pipe fittings fromBrazil Affirmative 5-0 Affirmed

Armstrong Rubber Co.v. US 685 F.Supp. 252 3/17/88 Watson

731-200(Prelim)

Radial-ply tires for passenger cars from theRepublic of Korea Negative 5-0 Remanded



COURT DECISIONS RESULTING IN REMANDSTO THE U.S. INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

I. PERCENTAGE OF REMANDS FOR TEN-YEAR TIME PERIODS FORTHE COURT AS A WHOLE

II. PERCENTAGE OF REMANDS FOR INDIVIDUAL JUDGES

III. REMANDS BY INDIVIDUAL JUDGES AS A PERCENTAGE OF ALLREMANDS BY THE COURT TO THE ITC

IV. PERCENTAGE OF REMANDS FOR NEGATIVE v. AFFIRMATIVEAGENCY INJURY DETERMINATIONS

V. ARE REMANDS MORE LIKELY WHEN THE ITC INJURYDETERMINATION IS NOT UNANIMOUS, OR NEARLY SO?

I. Judicial Review of ITC Injury Determinations for Ten Year Time Periods: Percentage of Remands

II. Judicial Review of ITC Injury Determinations: Percentage of Opinions byIndividual Judges Directing Remand

* No remands ordered during this period by Judges Gordon and Maletz.

Aqu

ilino

Bar

zila

y

Boe

Car

man

DiC

arlo

Eato

n

Gol

dber

g

Gor

don

*

Mal

etz

*

Mus

grav

e

New

man

Pogu

e

Rao

Res

tani

Rid

gway

Tsou

cala

s

Wal

lach

Wat

son

Judges (1980 - 2008)

0

20

40

60

80

100P

erce

nt

Percent remanded

II A. Judicial Review of ITC Injury Determinations: Pertinent Data

Judge Total Decisions Number of Remands Number of Affirmed Percent RemandedAquilino 18 9 9 50

Barzilay 7 1 6 14

Boe 3 2 1 67

Carman 26 6 20 23

DiCarlo 22 7 15 32

Eaton 14 10 4 71

Goldberg 22 10 12 45

Gordon * 2 0 2 0

Maletz * 1 0 1 0

Musgrave 8 3 5 37

Newman 3 1 2 33

Pogue 16 6 10 37

Rao 1 1 0 100

Restani 43 16 27 37

Ridgway 2 1 1 50

Tsoucalas 19 5 14 26

Wallach 8 1 7 12

Watson 11 9 2 82

Total 226 88 138* No remands ordered during this period by Judges Gordon and Maletz.

III. A. Judicial Review of ITC Injury Determinations: Proportion of Total DecisionsAccounted for by Individual Judges

8.0%

3.1%1.3%

11.5%

9.7%

6.2%

9.7%0.9%

0.4%3.5%

1.3%

7.1%

0.4%

19.0%

0.9%

8.4%

3.5%4.9%

AquilinoBarzilayBoeCarmanDiCarloEatonGoldbergGordonMaletz

MusgraveNewmanPogueRaoRestaniRidgwayTsoucalasWallachWatson

III.B Judicial Review of ITC Injury Determinations: Proportion of the Total Number ofRemands Ordered by Individual Judges

10.2%

1.1%2.3%

6.8%

8.0%

11.4%

11.4%3.4%

1.1%

6.8%

1.1%

18.2%

1.1%

5.7%

1.1%

10.2%

AquilinoBarzilayBoeCarmanDiCarloEatonGoldbergGordonMaletz

MusgraveNewmanPogueRaoRestaniRidgwayTsoucalasWallachWatson

IV. Judicial Review of ITC Injury Determinations: Comparison of the Number of RemandsOccurring in Cases Involving Negative Injury Determinations v. Affirmative InjuryDeterminations

V. Are Remands More Likely When the ITC Injury Determination is not Unanimous

0.30

0.35

0.40

0.45

0.50

0.55

0.60

0.65

50 60 67 75 80 100ITC Vote Split (in percentage terms)

Rem

and

Prob

abili

ty

Documents

U.S. COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE DECISIONS REVIEWING