U.S. CA Case Study Lecture

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 7/28/2019 U.S. CA Case Study Lecture

    1/106

    Introduction

    International Finance, International

    Macroeconomics, International trades are the

    results of the fact that economic activities areaffected by the existence of nations.

  • 7/28/2019 U.S. CA Case Study Lecture

    2/106

    Introduction (Cont.)

    Because of International trade as well as

    borrowing and lending, economic opportunities

    are expanded and households have better

    opportunities to effectively use their income.

    However, as the Existence of Banks makes

    bank panics possible, so does the existence of

    international finance system makes

    international financial crises possible.

  • 7/28/2019 U.S. CA Case Study Lecture

    3/106

    International Finance Covers Many Topical

    Issues

    As a subject, International Finance / International macroeconomics cover many

    topical issues, for example:

    Is the current account deficit too large? What has or will happen to the dollar/

    euro /INR?

    Should China devalue its Yuan (RMB)? Should Sweden give up its currency to join Euro?

    Should emerging market economies liberalize their financial markets?

    There are basic forces that underlie the flow of goods, services and capital

    between countries and are related with key political, economic and cultural factors.

    Businesses, politicians and policy makers all realize the importance of these trades

    and capital flows recorded in the Balance-of-Payments (BOP) statement.

    They pay attention to Balance-of-Payments (BOP) and especially to the massive

    and continuing U.S. Trade deficits.

  • 7/28/2019 U.S. CA Case Study Lecture

    4/106

    The Current Account Deficit of the United States

    The case examines a macroeconomic phenomenon: the U.S.

    current account deficit of the 80s, that was often referred to as:

    (a) A Paradox

    (b) A Threat

    (c) A Conundrum (has only conjectural answer)

    The U.S. current account deficit was / is considered the core

    of so-called global imbalances and is a cause for a feeling of

    distress or fear(consternation) among policy makers and

    business around the world.

  • 7/28/2019 U.S. CA Case Study Lecture

    5/106

    CA deficit as a % of GDP

    In 1986 1987, The U.S was running a current account deficit

    of over 3% ($300 + billion) of GDP. This was considered to be very

    large figure at the time. By 2005/2006, the current account

    deficit had reached over 5% of GDP. The U.S. runs a substantial current account deficit since the

    early 1980s with the exception of couple of years around early

    1990s. In 2011, the deficit had declined to approx. U.S.D 466

    billion or about 3% of GDP.

  • 7/28/2019 U.S. CA Case Study Lecture

    6/106

    U.S. Current Account Balance

    2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

    Exports of goods and services and income receipts 2488394 2656585 2180553 2518767 2847988

    Imports of goods & services and income payments -3083637 -3207834 -2439990 -2829645 -3180861

    Unilateral current transfers, net -115061 -125885 -122459 -131074 -133053

    The U,S. Current Account Balance -710304 -677134 -381896 -441952 -465926

  • 7/28/2019 U.S. CA Case Study Lecture

    7/106

    CA Balance - India

    Indias C.A. Balance:

  • 7/28/2019 U.S. CA Case Study Lecture

    8/106

    Nations by their cumulative current account

    balances over the years 1980-2008:

  • 7/28/2019 U.S. CA Case Study Lecture

    9/106

    Continuing large U.S. Current account deficit

    The massive and continuing U.S. deficits are of

    considerable concern not only for the U.S. but

    internationally.

    Although, the government policies regarding foreign exchange

    are often geared towards dealing with balance-of-payment

    problem, many people and experts disagree (controversy) on

    the nature of the trade deficit problem and their solutions.These controversies are illustrated by the following quotes

    related to the current account deficits of mid 1980s.

  • 7/28/2019 U.S. CA Case Study Lecture

    10/106

    Controversies are illustrated

    I had a trade deficit in 1986 because I took a vacation in France. I

    didnt worry about it; I enjoyed it.

    Herbert Stein: Chairman of the Council of Economic Advisor to President Nixon

    and Ford.

    We have almost a crisis in trade and this is the year Congress willtry to turn it around with trade legislation

    Lloyd Bentsen: U.S. Senator.

    Despite all the cries for protectionism to cure the trade deficit,

    protectionism will not lower the trade deficit

    Phil Gramm: U.S. Senator.

    More recently, Warren Buffett was among the many individuals

    with concerns about the U.S. current account deficit.

  • 7/28/2019 U.S. CA Case Study Lecture

    11/106

    Deficit Hawks Vs. Doves

    Deficit hawks raise three objections to persistent federal

    government budget deficits:

    a) they pose a solvency risk that could force to

    government to default on its debt;

    b) they pose an inflation, or even a hyperinflation, risk;

    and

    c) they impose a burden on our grandkids, who will haveto pay interest in perpetuity to the Chinese who are

    accumulating treasuries as well as power over the fate of the

    dollar.

  • 7/28/2019 U.S. CA Case Study Lecture

    12/106

    Deficit Hawks Vs. Doves (Cont.)

    The deficit dove positions include:

    1. Since government spending is merely a matter of changing

    numbers in bank accounts on its own spread sheet, there is

    no solvency issue or sustainability issue.2. The right size deficit is the one that coincides with our stated

    goals of full employment and price stability.

    3. Interest rates for government are set by the government, and

    not by the market place.

    Bang for the buck considerations are moot as the size of the

    deficit per se is not an issue.

  • 7/28/2019 U.S. CA Case Study Lecture

    13/106

    Go to BOARD 4 R

  • 7/28/2019 U.S. CA Case Study Lecture

    14/106

    Income Identities

    National Income Accounting Identities

    GDP = C+I+G+(X-M)

    GDP-C-G = I+(X-M)

    GDP - (C-T) (T-G) = I+(X-M) Sprivate + Sgovernment = I+(X-M)

    Under GDP definition of income, (X-M) = Trade balance

    Under GNP definition of income, (X-M) = closer to current account

    Global Accounting Identities Sworld = Iworld

    Su.s +SRestof world = Iu.s. + IRest of world

  • 7/28/2019 U.S. CA Case Study Lecture

    15/106

    Balance of Payment

    Balance of Payment Identities

    Current Account (CA) =ExportsImports +Investment Income +Other services Income +

    Transfers

    Financial Account (FA) =Long-term Capital+Short-term Capital

    Capital Account & others (KA)

    Changes in reserves CA+FA+(KA)Change in reserve = 0

    CAu.s. = - CArest of world

  • 7/28/2019 U.S. CA Case Study Lecture

    16/106

    When production > domestic expenditure, exports >imports: current account > 0 and trade balance > 0 when a country exports more than it imports, it earns more

    income from exports than it spends on imports

    net foreign wealth is increasing (lending to the Rest of the World)

    When production < domestic expenditure, exports I, then CA > 0so that net foreigninvestment and financial capital outflows for thedomestic economy are positive.

  • 7/28/2019 U.S. CA Case Study Lecture

    20/106

    How Is the Current Account Related toNational Saving? (cont.)

    CA = SI = Sp + SgI

    Sp = I + CASg

    = I + CA + (GT)

    Private savings are used to finance: private investment,the current account (net purchases to foreigners) and theGovernment deficit.

    CA = SpI(GT)

    A high government deficit causes anegative current account balance when other factorsremain constant.

    Example: TWIN DEFICITS in the US.

  • 7/28/2019 U.S. CA Case Study Lecture

    21/106

    DISCUSSION BOP

  • 7/28/2019 U.S. CA Case Study Lecture

    22/106

    Balance of Payment (BOP)

    A countrys account for its payments to and its receipts from

    foreigners is recorded in the Balance Of Payments (BOP)

    accounts. The Balance of Payment is an accounting statement

    (document) of a country that shows in the summary form all the

    economic transactions between residents (Public & Private

    Sectors) of the home country and residents of all other

    countries i.e. all payment and receipts of the country vis--vis

    the rest of the world.

    An international transaction involves two parties, and each

    transaction enters the accounts twice: once as a credit (+) and

    once as a debit (-) i.e. double entry book keeping.

  • 7/28/2019 U.S. CA Case Study Lecture

    23/106

    Political, economic & culture affect flow of

    goods and services between countries

    There are basic forces that underlie the flow of goods,

    services and capital between countries and relate these flows to

    political, economic and cultural factors.

    Government foreign exchange policies are often gearedtowards dealing with balance of payments problems.

    Domestic and world economies (such as GDP / GNP,

    consumptions, savings, capital formation) are linked to financial

    (money, currency, exchange rates, etc.) and real activities

    (macroeconomic activities related to aggregate supply and

    aggregate demand in an economy).

  • 7/28/2019 U.S. CA Case Study Lecture

    24/106

    Double entry bookkeeping

    BOP statements are based on double entry book-keeping i.e.

    every economic transaction recorded as a credit brings about an

    equal and offsetting debit entry, and vice versa. It ensures that

    debits equal credits, i.e. the sum of all transaction is zero. The

    sum of the balance on the current account, capital account and

    financial account must equal zero.

    Example of Balance of Payments Accounting: You buy an ink-jet fax machine from the Italiancompany Olivetti and pay for your purchase with a $1,000 check.

    Olivettis salesperson deposits the check in Olivettis account at Citibank in New York.

    Fax machine purchase -$1,000

    (current account, debit, US good import)

    Sale of bank deposit by Citibank +$1,000

    (financial account, credit, US asset export)

  • 7/28/2019 U.S. CA Case Study Lecture

    25/106

    Example of Balance ofPayments Accounting (cont.)

    You have a fine dinner at the Restaurant de lEscargotdOr in Paris and pay $200 with your Visacard.

    First Card, the company that issued your Visa card owes a $200 future payment to the restaurant

    Meal purchase in France(Current account, debit, US service import) $200

    Sale of claim on First Card(financial account, credit, US asset export) +$200

  • 7/28/2019 U.S. CA Case Study Lecture

    26/106

    Example of Balance ofPayments Accounting (cont.)

    You purchase $95 in shares issued by the UK oil giant BritishPetroleum (BP).

    British Petroleum receives the payment in its own US bank accountat Second Bank of Chicago.

    Purchase of BP shares(financial account, debit, US asset import) -$95

    BPs deposit at Second Bank of Chicago +$95(financial account, credit, US asset export)

  • 7/28/2019 U.S. CA Case Study Lecture

    27/106

    Implication of Double Entry Bookkeeping

    Double entry bookkeeping methodology implies that any

    movement in the current account must be reflected in an equivalent

    change in the countrys net foreign asset position i.e. current accountequals the difference between a countrys purchase of assets from

    foreigners and its sale of assets to them, which is the sum of the

    capital account (KA) & financial account.

  • 7/28/2019 U.S. CA Case Study Lecture

    28/106

    Three Broad Accounts

    The Balance Of Payments (BOP) accounts are separated into

    THREE (3) broad accounts:

    1. Current account: accounts for flows of goods and

    services (imports and exports).2. Financial account: accounts for flows of financial

    assets (financial capital).

    3. Capital account: flows of special categories of

    assets (capital): typically non-market, non-produced, orintangible assets like debt forgiveness, copyrights and

    trademarks.

  • 7/28/2019 U.S. CA Case Study Lecture

    29/106

    Must Balance

    The Balance of Payments Accounts must Balance

    Due to the double entry of each transaction, the balance of

    payments accounts will balance by the following equation:

    current account +

    financial account +

    capital account = 0

  • 7/28/2019 U.S. CA Case Study Lecture

    30/106

    Sum of Four Components

    1. Current Account (CA)records exports and imports ofgoods, services and international receipt of income /payments /

    unilateral transfer (gifts/aids.) transactions.

    Basically it involves current income and expenditure. CA

    consists of: (a) Trade (goods) account,(b) Service account, (c)

    Income account. and (e) Unilateral transfer account

  • 7/28/2019 U.S. CA Case Study Lecture

    31/106

    Sum (a+b+c+d) = Current Account Balance

    (a) Trade (goods) account: record flows of goods - imports and exports

    merchandise (goods like DVDs)

    Exports of goods are credits (+) to the current account

    Imports of goods are debits (-) to the current account

    (b) Service account: records import and export of services (payments for

    legal services, shipping services, tourist meals, tuition paid to universities by

    international students, money spent on travel by tourists, banking, insurance,

    consulting services etc.)

    Exports of services are credits to the current account (+)

    Imports of services are debits to the current account (-).

  • 7/28/2019 U.S. CA Case Study Lecture

    32/106

    Sum (a+b+c+d) = Current Account Balance

    (c) Income account: income receipts (interest and dividend payments,

    earnings of firms and workers operating in foreign countries)

    Interest, dividends and other income received on U.S. assets held abroadare credits (+)

    Interest, dividends and payments made on foreign assets held in the U.S. aredebits (-).

    (d) Unilateral transfer account: net unilateral transfers such as gifts (transfers) acrosscountries that do not purchase a good or service nor serve as income forgoods and services produced, military aids, technical knowhow.

    Remittances by U.S. citizens working abroad, unilateral aid to the U.S. from other

    countries pensions paid by foreign countries to their citizens living in the U.S.Count as credits (+).

    Remittances by foreigners working in the U.S., unilateral aid from the U.S. toother countries, pensions paid to U.S. citizens living abroad count as debits (-).

  • 7/28/2019 U.S. CA Case Study Lecture

    33/106

    Current Account Balance

    The sum of these components (a+b+c+d) is known as the

    current account balance. A negative number is called a current

    account deficit and a positive number called a current account

    surplus.

    Intuitively, think of credits to the current account as

    transactions involving receipt of income to U.S. resident and

    debits to the current account as transactions involving payment

    of income to foreigners. The transactions can involve goods,

    services, investment income, pension income or other unilateral

    transfers.

  • 7/28/2019 U.S. CA Case Study Lecture

    34/106

    Capital Account

    2. Capital account: Records special transfers of assets such as

    flows of special categories of assets (capital) - typically non-

    market, non-produced, or intangible assets like debt forgiveness,

    copyrights and trademarks, but this is a minor account for theU.S.

    A positive value for the capital account is called a capital account

    surplus, a negative value is called a capital account deficit.

  • 7/28/2019 U.S. CA Case Study Lecture

    35/106

    Financial Account

    3. Financial account: Accounts for flows of financial assets

    (financial capital), the difference between sales of domesticassets to foreigners and purchases of foreign assets by domesticcitizens.

    Financial inflow: Foreigners loan to domestic citizens by

    buying domestic assets. Domestic assets sold to foreigners are acredit (+) because the domestic economy acquires money duringthe transaction

    Financial outflow: Domestic citizens loan to foreigners by

    buying foreign assets. Foreign assets purchased by domesticcitizens are a debit (-) because the domestic economy gives upmoney during the transaction.

  • 7/28/2019 U.S. CA Case Study Lecture

    36/106

    Financial Account

    Financial account has at least Three (3) subcategories:

    (a) Official (international) reserve assets

    (b) All other assets

    (c) Statistical discrepancy

  • 7/28/2019 U.S. CA Case Study Lecture

    37/106

    Financial Account

    1. Purchase and Sale of Assets

    Purchases of U.S. assets by foreigners are credits to the capital account (+)

    Purchases of foreign assets by U.S. residents are debits to the financialaccount (-)

    What counts as an asset? Purchases of stocks or bonds (financialinvestment) or purchases of a part or whole of foreign based companies(direct investment). The capital account is where the BOP accounts starts toget tricky. Since U.S. residents can also sell some of the foreign assets theyhad purchased before, we need to track the sale of assets as well. Theeasiest way is to record the sale of assets in the BOP in the exact oppositeway we record the purchase of assets (i.e. think of a $500 sale as a purchaseof a -$500 asset).

    Sales of U.S. assets by foreigners count as debits to the capital account (-)

    Sales of foreign assets by U.S. residents count as credits to the capital account (+)

  • 7/28/2019 U.S. CA Case Study Lecture

    38/106

    Financial Account

    2. Making and Repaying Loans :

    Sales of U.S. assets by foreigners count as debits to the capital

    account (-)

    Sales of foreign assets by U.S. residents count as credits to the

    capital account (+)

    As with assets, we have to track repayment of loans as well as

    tracing new loans. Thus, repayment of existing loans has to be

    recorded in the exact opposite fashion as the making of a new loan.

    Decreases of loans to U.S. residents (U.S. repayment) by foreigners is

    a debit (-)Decreases of loans to foreigners by U.S. residents (foreign

    repayment) is a credit (+)

  • 7/28/2019 U.S. CA Case Study Lecture

    39/106

    Financial Account

    3. Changes in Holdings of Currency

    Increases in dollar holdings by foreigners counts as a credit to the capital account(+)

    Increases in holdings of foreign currency by U.S. residents counts as a debit (-)

    The easiest way to think about currency is to treat it as another asset. Soforeigners holding more U.S. currency is treated just like foreigners holding moreU.S. assets. Similarly, U.S. residents holding more foreign currency is treated justlike U.S. residents holding more foreign assets. Accordingly decreases in holding offoreign currency are treated like sales of assets.

    Decreases in dollar holdings by foreigners counts as a debit to the capital account(-)

    Decreases in holdings of foreign currency by U.S. residents counts as a credit (+)

  • 7/28/2019 U.S. CA Case Study Lecture

    40/106

    Reserve Assets

    Official (international) reserve assets: Foreign assets held by

    central banks to cushion against financial instability. Assets

    include government bonds, currency, gold and accounts at the

    International Monetary Fund.

    Official reserve assets owned by (sold to) foreign central

    banks are a credit (+) because the domestic central bank can

    spend more money to cushion against instability.

    Official reserve assets owned by (purchased by) the domesticcentral bank are a debit (-) because the domestic central bank

    can spend less money to cushion against instability.

  • 7/28/2019 U.S. CA Case Study Lecture

    41/106

    Official Reserves Account

    Change in the official reserves measures a nations surplus or

    deficit on its current, Financial and capital account

    transactions by netting reserves liabilities from reserve assets.

    A surplus will lead to an increase in official holdings of foreign

    currencies and / or gold.

    A deficit will normally cause a reduction in these assets.

  • 7/28/2019 U.S. CA Case Study Lecture

    42/106

    Official Reserves Assets (Cont.)

    Official (international) reserve assets: foreign assets held bycentral banks to cushion against financial instability.

    Assets include government bonds, currency, gold and accounts at theInternational Monetary Fund.

    Official foreign exchange intervention: Central banks buy or sellinternational reserves in private markets to affect macroeocnomicconditions (aiming at either a strong or a weak currency)

    Official reserve assets owned by (sold to) foreign central banks are acredit (+) because the domestic central bank can spend more money tocushion against instability.

    Official reserve assets owned by (purchased by) the domestic centralbank are a debit (-) because the domestic central bank can spend lessmoney to cushion against instability.

  • 7/28/2019 U.S. CA Case Study Lecture

    43/106

    Implication of OSB

    The negative value of the official reserve assets is called the officialsettlements balanceor balance of payments.

    It is the sum of the current account, the capital account, the non-reserve portion of the financial account, and the statisticaldiscrepancy.

    A negative official settlements balance may indicate that acountry is depleting its official international reserve assets or

    may be incurring large debts to foreign central banks so that

    the domestic central bank can spend a lot to protect against

    financial instability.

    RISK FOR A CURRENCY CRISIS DUE TO SEVEREEXCHANGE RATE DEPRECIATION

  • 7/28/2019 U.S. CA Case Study Lecture

    44/106

    Statistical discrepancy

    Statistical discrepancy reflects errors and omissions in

    collecting data on international transactions.

    The discrepancy may coincide with worrisome foreign events

    such as war, civil unrest / upheaval.

    Many experts believe that the statistical discrepancy is

    primarily the result of foreigners surreptitiously moving

    money into what they deem to be a safe political country.

  • 7/28/2019 U.S. CA Case Study Lecture

    45/106

    Official Settlement Balance OR Balance of

    Payment

    The balance of payments accounts therefore seldom balance

    in practice. The statistical discrepancyis the account added to or

    subtracted from the financial account to make it balance with

    the current account and capital account.

    The negative value of the official reserve assets is called the

    official settlements balance (OSB) or balance of payments.

    It is the sum of the current account, the capital account, the

    non-reserve portion of the financial account, and the statistical

    discrepancy.

  • 7/28/2019 U.S. CA Case Study Lecture

    46/106

    Dynamics of the Current Account

    Warren Buffett was among individuals with concerns about the

    U.S. Current Account Deficits. He increased the value of its

    foreign exchange contracts, consisting predominantly of short

    positions against the dollar.

    Student vote:

    How many of us think that betting against the dollar was:

    good idea

    bad idea

    Not sure /uncertain

  • 7/28/2019 U.S. CA Case Study Lecture

    47/106

    Now Lets look at the basic facts

    Board (1) Left side

    Why bet Against the Dollar?

    U.S.GDP: $ trillion (2005)

    U.S.GDP: $ trillion (2007)

    Current Account: $ billion

    U.S. Current Account Deficit: > of GDP

    U.S.net Liabilities: Aprox. Is this situation sustainable?

    Is depreciation of dollar likely?

  • 7/28/2019 U.S. CA Case Study Lecture

    48/106

    Now Lets look at the basic facts

    Why bet Against the Dollar?

    U.S.GDP: $12.6 trillion (2005 Ex. 2a)

    U.S.GDP: $14.0 trillion (2007 Ex. 2a)

    Current Account: $ -746 billion (Ex.4a)

    U.S. Current Account Deficit: > 5% of GDP (Ex. 4b,2a,4a)

    U.S.net Liabilities: Aprox.15% (Ex. 8, 2a) (1932/12600)

    Is this situation sustainable? Is depreciation of dollar likely?

  • 7/28/2019 U.S. CA Case Study Lecture

    49/106

    Dynamics of the Current Account

    Other data:

    U.S.Savings (2005): Low, % of GDP= Net Investment

    + net export {(Net Export= negative & 2b : net domestic

    investment = %)}. Less than 1% of GDP in 2000 (text (Page:6))

    U.S. fiscal deficit (2005): Approx. (exhibit 3a

    &3b)

    U.S.Interest rate: Low/ high/moderate? Low

    Approx. (exhibit)

    Reserves in China:~$ billion increase in 2005 (Case Text

    and exhibit 9a & 9b)

  • 7/28/2019 U.S. CA Case Study Lecture

    50/106

    Dynamics of the Current Account

    Other data:

    U.S.Savings(2005): Low Aprox: 2% of GDP=Net Investment

    + net export {(exhibit 2a : Net Export= negative 6% & 2b : net

    domestic investment =8%)}. Less than 1% of GDP in 2000 (text

    (Page:6))

    U.S. fiscal deficit (2005): Approx. 2.5% (exhibit 3a

    &3b)

    U.S.Interest rate: Low/ high/moderate? Low

    Approx. 4% (exhibit 1b)

    Reserves in China:~$200 billion increase in 2005 (Case Text

    and exhibit 9a & 9b)

  • 7/28/2019 U.S. CA Case Study Lecture

    51/106

    Dynamics of Current Account Deficit

    By 2006,the U.S current Account deficit at $788 billion, closeto 6% of GDP, which was record high for the U.S. in absoluteterms.

    Persistently high current account deficits were unheard of in

    large industrial countries. Further more net liabilities were around 17% of GDP. Some

    economists were forecasting net liabilities to rise as high as60%. Such high levels of net liabilities had occurred in otherlarge industrial countries, but were uncommon. There were

    questions about whether this situation was sustainable. If not, a depreciation of the U.S. dollar was considered very

    likely.

  • 7/28/2019 U.S. CA Case Study Lecture

    52/106

    Dynamics Of Current Account Deficit

    However, coming to a conclusion on whether to bet againstdollar is more complicated.

    Understanding the Dynamics of the current account,particularly the relationship among domestic savings and

    investment, trade and international capital flows,international growth and productivity in trade and non-tradedgoods; prices, interest rates, and exchange rates, and fiscaland monetary policy, is important as a first step in being ableto evaluate the decision to bet against the dollar.

    PERHAPS WE WILL BE ABLE TO RETURN TO THE QUESTIONWITH More INSIGHTs TOWARDS THE END OF THE CLASS.

  • 7/28/2019 U.S. CA Case Study Lecture

    53/106

    Why is the US Current Account in Deficit?

    How does the current account deficit relate to

    domestic versus international factors? Pattern Of

    Consumption? savings? Investment? Trade? Is China

    a Problem? Or is China A solution? What aboutEurope?

  • 7/28/2019 U.S. CA Case Study Lecture

    54/106

    National income Accounting Identities

    GDP = C+I+G+(X-M)

    GDP-C-G = I+(X-M)

    GDP - (C-T) (T-G) = I+(X-M)

    Sprivate + Sgovernment = I+(X-M)

    Under GDP definition of income, (X-M) = Trade balance

    Under GNP definition of income, (X-M) = closer to current account

    Global Accounting Identities

    Sworld = Iworld

    Su.s +SRest of world = Iu.s. + IRest of world

  • 7/28/2019 U.S. CA Case Study Lecture

    55/106

    Balance of Payment Identities

    Current Account (CA) =

    Exports

    Imports +

    Investment Income + Other services Income +Transfers

    Financial Account (FA) =

    Long-term Capital+

    Short-term Capital

  • 7/28/2019 U.S. CA Case Study Lecture

    56/106

    Balance of Payment Identities (cont.)

    Capital Account & others (KA)

    Changes in reserves

    CA+FA+(KA)Change in reserve = 0

    CAu.s. = - CArest of world

  • 7/28/2019 U.S. CA Case Study Lecture

    57/106

    Collect Comments in three sections.

    Examine the Causes of Large U.S. current

    account deficit

    The Three areas are: (a) i. National income

    accounts (the relationship between savings

    and investment) and ii. Trade flows; (b) capital

    flows, and ( c) the role of China and the rest ofthe world. Board 2.

    C f l S C d fi i

  • 7/28/2019 U.S. CA Case Study Lecture

    58/106

    Cause of large U.S.Current account deficit

    Board 3a

    Capital flows

    (benign view)

  • 7/28/2019 U.S. CA Case Study Lecture

    59/106

    Cause of large U.S. Current account deficit (3a)

    Capital flows(Benign view) Reflects financial flowsholds the market: shares of US equities

    in world equities has increased, so shares of us equities in neutral investor

    portfolio should also increase.

    Greenspan: Globalization means more financial intermediationfinance bigger deficit as Home Bias declines.

    U.S. better at producing financial assets

    Bernanke: Global savings Glut

    Asian countries (esp. China) concerned about maintaining exports

    to U.S.

    Ability of U.S. to borrow in its own currency

    C f l U S C d fi i

  • 7/28/2019 U.S. CA Case Study Lecture

    60/106

    Cause of large U.S.Current account deficit

    Board 3b

    Role of China

  • 7/28/2019 U.S. CA Case Study Lecture

    61/106

    Role of China 3b (center)

    1.Appreciated dollar

    2.Have sufficient reserves to avoid financial

    Crisis, and steep changes in the exchange rate

    .in Sum to dirty / managed float

    In this case, global imbalance likely

    sustainable for much longer.

    In this case, China has enough already and

    the U.S. current account deficit is going to

    become unsustainable soon

    Perfect

    Match !

    China engages in currency manipulation to develop

    People in the United states enjoy high present consumption

    Perfect Match !

    But it is important to figure out in this context: WHY the Chinese accumulate so much?Two Possibilities

  • 7/28/2019 U.S. CA Case Study Lecture

    62/106

    Dynamics of Current Account Board (2) Center

    Domestic= I + (X-M) Rest of the World

    National income Accounts Trade Flows Capital Flows Role of China Europe/ rest of the world

    Causes of Large U.S. Current account DeficitGlobal Imbalances: S

    us+ S

    Rest of world= I

    us+I

    Rest of WorldDomestic: Sprivat+ Sgovernment= I + (XM) Rest of the World

    Dynamics of Current Account d ( )

  • 7/28/2019 U.S. CA Case Study Lecture

    63/106

    Dynamics of Current Account Board (2) Center

    Domestic: SPrivate +SGovernment = I + (X-M) Rest of the WorldNational income Accounts

    -Little Savings:

    ( Low private savings, high consumption

    in the U.S)

    Low Public Savings (Government deficit,war, tax cuts, etc.)

    -Investment : high, low?

    If investment and private savings remain

    unchanged, a government deficit must

    result in trade deficit (GDP View) orcurrent Account (GNP view)

    Trade Flows

    The U.S, imports too

    much, can not produce

    cheaply / innovatively

    enough to export goods.

    - Supply factors

    -Demand Factors

    -Role of exchange rate

    Capital Flows

    (See

    continuation 3a)

    Role of China

    (See

    continuation

    3b)

    Europe/ rest of the world

    Savings glut

    Low growth in Europe?

    Other countries accumulating

    reserves.

    Causes of Large U.S. Current account DeficitGlobal Imbalances: Sus+ SRest of world = Ius+IRest of World

  • 7/28/2019 U.S. CA Case Study Lecture

    64/106

    Question?

    How does Macroeconomic forces affect the current account

    deficit in general and how do they affected the currentaccount deficit in the U.S. in the past in particular, as

    described in the case.

  • 7/28/2019 U.S. CA Case Study Lecture

    65/106

    Macroeconomic forces

    How different macroeconomic forces affect the currentaccount deficits in general and how they affected the currentaccount deficits in the U.S. in the past, in particular, asdescribed in the case.

    There are three areas that may shed some light on the issuesviz. :

    (i) National Income Account (the relationshipbetween savings and investment) and Trade

    flows.(ii) Capital flows, and

    (iii) The role of Asia and the rest of the world.

  • 7/28/2019 U.S. CA Case Study Lecture

    66/106

    National income accounts (for use in board 2)

    S = Sprivate + Sgovernment = I +(X-M)

    In a simplistic way this identity equates the current account

    to the trade account (X-M).

    In reality, the current account also includes net factor

    payments from abroad which is the difference between

    income earned on capital and labor working outside the home

    country and income earned in the home country by foreign

    capital and laboras well as net unilateral transfers, whichincludes private gifts and official foreign aid.

  • 7/28/2019 U.S. CA Case Study Lecture

    67/106

    Explanation for the U.S. current account deficit?

    Does the above relationship help explain the U.S. Currentaccount Deficit? How?

  • 7/28/2019 U.S. CA Case Study Lecture

    68/106

    Explanation for the U.S. current account deficit

    If the current account balance is given by (X-M) is negative, acountry must borrow from foreigners (or sell assets to

    foreigners), given the same level of savings and investment. In

    this case i.e negative (X-M), the U.S. appears to be spending

    beyond its means

  • 7/28/2019 U.S. CA Case Study Lecture

    69/106

    Role of twin deficit

    The case discusses the combination of high fiscal deficit (seecase exhibits 3a and 3b for details on fiscal deficit) with high

    current account deficit during the 1980s. The high fiscal

    deficits in the 1980s were largely caused by tax cuts rather

    than increased government spending. Although, the Ricardianequivalance proposition states that tax cuts should have no

    impact on savings or the current account, it is clear from the

    identity above that a decrease in government savings (no

    matter what the cause) would need to be off set by an

    increase in private savings; otherwise domestic investment

    need to decline or the current account deficit would increase

    (or both).

  • 7/28/2019 U.S. CA Case Study Lecture

    70/106

    Re-conciliation of Exhibit 2a and 2b

    Exhibit 2a shows gross private fixed domestic investment as 17% ofGDP in2005. In Exhibit 2b, net domestic investment shows up at 7%of GDP. Why is the difference? Please clarify.

    Footnote to the exhibit explained that the net domestic investment

    refers to public and private investment and is net of depreciation. In2005, net domestic investment amounted to 7% of GDP, grossdomestic public investment was 3% of GDP, and depreciationamounted to 13% of GDP. Adding net domestic investment of 7% todepreciation of 13% implies gross domestic investment of 20%.

    Subtracting 3% gross domestic public investment means that grossprivate fixed domestic investment is 17%, which is consistent withthe value shown in Exhibit 2a.

  • 7/28/2019 U.S. CA Case Study Lecture

    71/106

    Exhibit 2a (case) explains the identities

    How can we explain the following identities based on Exhibit 2a,which shows gross numbers:

    (a) GDP = C + I+ G + (X-M)

    (b) Sprivate + Sgovernment = I+ (X M)

    (a) For 2006, Household consumption (C) as a percent of GDP is 70 %, i.e. C =70%, plusgross investment (I) as a percent of GDP is 17%, I= 17%; plus government consumptionas a percent of GDP (G=19%) plus the (approximation of the) current account as apercent of GDP ((X-M) = -6%). (70% + 17% +19% -6% = 100%)

    (b) Gross domestic savings as a percent of GDP (Sprivate + Sgovernment =11%) equals

    gross investment as a percent of GDP (I = 17%), plus the(approximation of the) current account as a percent of GDP ((X-M)=-6%). (17% - 6% = 11%). Exhibit 2b shows net values and are notappropriate for calculation of these identities)

  • 7/28/2019 U.S. CA Case Study Lecture

    72/106

    The U.S. appeared to be an oasis of prosperity

    The so called New Economy of the late 1990s increasedinvestment (both from local sources and foreign sources) while

    decreasing private savings opening up ween two variables.

    With an increase increase in government savings not large enough

    to offset the gap, in order for the identity to balance, the currentaccount balance, the current account deficit also needed to

    increase.

    The U.S. appeared to be an oasis of prosperity at the time, rather

    than simply spending beyond its means.

    See case Exhibit 2b, it appears that large current account deficits inthe late 1990s were driven more by rising levels of investment than

    by declining savings rate relative to those in the rest of the world.

  • 7/28/2019 U.S. CA Case Study Lecture

    73/106

    Continuing Housing Boom

    In the late 1990s and through 2004, the U.S. current accountdeficit was driven by low government savings and low private

    savings driven by continuing housing boom than high levels of

    investment.

    ( Feed to column 1, board 2)

  • 7/28/2019 U.S. CA Case Study Lecture

    74/106

    Trade flow of goods and services

    What are the most important factors influencing the tradeaccount?

  • 7/28/2019 U.S. CA Case Study Lecture

    75/106

    Trade flows of goods and services

    What are the most important factors influencing the tradeaccount?

    1. Role of Supply factor

    2. Role of Demand factors for U.S. goods

    3. Role of real Exchange rate

    Was good U S economic health in the early

  • 7/28/2019 U.S. CA Case Study Lecture

    76/106

    Was good U.S economic health in the early

    2000s responsible for widened CA deficit?

    Explain if and how that might have happened

  • 7/28/2019 U.S. CA Case Study Lecture

    77/106

    Trade flow of goods and services

    Role of Supply factors:

    Supply Factor include Economic growth, productivity,

    competitiveness.

    A study by Federal Reserve Vice Chairman Mr. Ferguson, Jr.

    argued that the surge in U.S. productivity growth, althoughnot explaining all of the deterioration in the trade balance

    between the mid-1990s and 2005, accounted for more of that

    deterioration than the fall in government and private savings

    combined.

  • 7/28/2019 U.S. CA Case Study Lecture

    78/106

    Trade flow of goods and services (cont.)

    Role of Supply factors (cont.): The study explains that the surge in U.S. productivity (see

    case exhibit 1a) served to deteriorate the current accountbalance through a number of channels : higher productivitygrowth boosted perceived rates of return on U.S. Investments,thereby increasing domestic investment as well as generatingcapital inflows that boosted the dollar; expectation of furtherhigher returns boosted equity prices, household wealth, andperceived long run income, and so consumption rose and

    saving rates declined. With increased investment, decreasedprivate savings, and an appreciated dollar, the U.S. currentaccount deficit widened.

  • 7/28/2019 U.S. CA Case Study Lecture

    79/106

    Role of supply factors

    Using this reasoning, the argument often made that a pick-up in foreignproductivity growth rates, relative to the U.S. rates, should lead to a

    closing of global imbalances.

    Some economists (Obstfeld, Rogoff), however, argue that this would be

    the case only if the relative productivity jump were in non-tradable goodsproductionfor example, if foreign retailing productivity levels started to

    catch up to those of the U.S., which experienced a retailing productivity

    boom during the 1980s and 1990s rather than tradable goods

    production. They argue that, contrary to conventional wisdom, as the

    global recovery rebalances towards growth in Europe and Japan, the U.S.current account deficit could actually become larger rather than smaller,

    at least initially.

  • 7/28/2019 U.S. CA Case Study Lecture

    80/106

    Role of supply factors(cont.)

    The reason is as follows:

    faster foreign productivity growth

    in non-tradable goods would raise foreign income, which could

    be spent on the U.S. exports; faster foreign productivity growth

    in tradable goods would exacerbate the U.S. current deficit asforeign tradable goods become more competitively priced.

    Furthermore, Obstfeld and Rogoff argue that faster traded goods

    productivity growth in the U.S. would help shrink the U.S.

    current account deficit (presumably, by making U.S. exportsmore competitive).

  • 7/28/2019 U.S. CA Case Study Lecture

    81/106

    Trade Flows of goods and services

    Role of demand factors for U.S. goods GDP growth in the U.S. increased U.S. Imports more than

    foreign GDP growth increase U.S. export.

    The asymmetry was more extreme for imports and exports of

    goods.

    For import and export of serevices it was reversed

  • 7/28/2019 U.S. CA Case Study Lecture

    82/106

    Role of demand factors for U.S. goods (cont.)

    The overall asymmetry implied (assuming constant exchange rate)that even if the U.S. and the rest of the world grew at the same

    rate, the U.S. current account deficit would continue to widen (see

    Exhibit 4c split between goods and services)

    Explaining the asymmetry The U.S. has large immigrant

    population (aprox. 10% of total population. Which tends to prefer

    and import products from their home countries and also tend to

    send remittances back to home countries.

    l f l h

  • 7/28/2019 U.S. CA Case Study Lecture

    83/106

    Role of real exchange rate

    Exchange rate impacts on trade flows

    Has immediate impact on the valuation of the U.S. assets

    abroad.

    For example: A depreciation of the dollar against the euro and

    pound would be expected to decrease U.S. imports ofEuropean goods and increase U.S. Exports to Europe.

    The real exchange rate is influenced by a number of factors

    including productivity growth rate. See case Exhibit 4b, for

    graphical representation suggesting the relationship betweenexchange rates and the trade balance.

    Flow of financial assets

  • 7/28/2019 U.S. CA Case Study Lecture

    84/106

    Flow of financial assets

    Sus + Srest of the world = Ius + Irest of the world

    Another way to examine the U.S. current account deficit is throughunderstanding international flows of financial assets.

    The current account (CA) in the U.S. Must be equal to -CA of the rest of

    the world.

    The relationship Sus + Srest of the world = Ius + Irestof the world , it is clear that the

    problem could be too much investment or too little savings in the U.S. or

    too much savings or too little investment in the rest of the world.

    Relationship between the current account and

  • 7/28/2019 U.S. CA Case Study Lecture

    85/106

    Relationship between the current account and

    financial flow

    Please use example from the case (withreference to Exhibit 5-7 of the case) to discuss

    the relationship between the current account

    and financial flows.

    Li k b h CA d h FA

  • 7/28/2019 U.S. CA Case Study Lecture

    86/106

    Link between the CA and the FA

    A countrys current account (CA) is the part ofthe balance sheet that reflects exports and

    imports of goods and services, the difference

    between income on foreign labor and capitalemployed in the home country and the

    income on home labor and capital employed

    abroad, and net unilateral transfers such asgifts and aid.

    Li k b h CA d h FA (C 1)

  • 7/28/2019 U.S. CA Case Study Lecture

    87/106

    Link between the CA and the FA (Cont. 1)

    A countrys financial account reflects international purchasesand sales of financial assets.

    The financial account represents the difference between

    foreign purchase of local assets and resident purchase of

    foreign assets. A countrys current account and financial account, after

    adjusting for omissions and errors, essentially sum to zero. In

    other words, a country with high current account deficit will

    have a high financial account surplus (in essence, as othercountries fund its purchase of extra imports through buying

    assets or lending money)

    M lti l t f fi i l t

  • 7/28/2019 U.S. CA Case Study Lecture

    88/106

    Multiple types of financial assets

    The Financial Account consists of multiple types of financialassets. Short-term or portfolio investments include purchase

    and sales of stocks, bonds, and derivatives. Long-term or

    direct investments including purchase and sales of production

    facilities and equity investments that lead to managerialcontrol. Other investment assets and liabilities include bank

    deposit, trade credits, and loans.

    Th U S E i St th

  • 7/28/2019 U.S. CA Case Study Lecture

    89/106

    The U.S. Economic Strength

    As noted in the case, the 2006 Economic Report of the Presidentfocused on international financial assets rather than current

    account deficit.

    The report entitled The U.S. Capital Account Surplus, noted that

    strong inflows of capital represented U.S.Economic strengths.

    It notes that the key issue concerning U.S. foreign capital inflows is

    not absolute level but the efficiency with which they are used.

    Provided capital inflows promote strong U.S. Investment,

    productivity, and growth, they provide important benefits to the

    U.S. as well as to the countries that are investing in the U.S.

    U.S.capital inflows can continue indefinitely.

    M ti F ld t i di d ith th l i

  • 7/28/2019 U.S. CA Case Study Lecture

    90/106

    Martin Feldstein disagreed with the analysis

    Mr. Feldstein (well known0 economist at the time, noted thatCA deficit can continue indefinitely only if the resulting

    growth of the external debt does not exceed the growth of

    GDP.

    A current account deficit can continue indefinitely but only if apart of the resulting interest and dividends owed to foreigners

    is financed by a trade surplus.

    So, even if global capital markets permit the current account

    surpluses to continue indefinitely, the dollar must eventuallydecline to a level that leads to a trade surplus.

    The U.S. is simply better at producing financial

  • 7/28/2019 U.S. CA Case Study Lecture

    91/106

    p y p g

    assets than other countries

    MIT Economist Ricardo Caballero The U.S. is simply better atproducing financial assets than other countries.

    Economist Catherine Manngain from the trade should no longerbe measured only in the real domain of goods and services, butshould also be measured in how increased financial intermediation

    can improve on the risk and return frontier of the internationalwealth portfolio availability of greater diversity of financial assetsand instruments allowed investors to target the type of risk theywished to undertake.

    Between 1995 and 2002, for OECD countries (excluding the U.S)

    external liabilities grew 8% per year while imports grew just 2% peryear. Part of the increase in finance relative to trade reflected thebuild-up of foreign currency reserves by private entities as well ascentral banks.

    D i f th d ll

  • 7/28/2019 U.S. CA Case Study Lecture

    92/106

    Dominance of the dollar

    The second important topic related to flows of financial assetsis the dominance of the dollar as international medium of

    exchange, implying that the U.S. could borrow in its own

    currency.

    Important in discussing sustainability of U.S. current accountdeficit.

    Th V l f l t d fi i l fl

  • 7/28/2019 U.S. CA Case Study Lecture

    93/106

    The Value of accumulated financial flows

    A third line of discussion relates to the value of accumulatedfinancial flows.

    The U.S. net internal investment position (NIIP) increased

    rapidly into 2004, and that this increase would imply future

    high net U.S. income payment to foreigners. These income payments would serve to deteriorate the

    current account deficit even further.

    The Value of accumulated financial flows

  • 7/28/2019 U.S. CA Case Study Lecture

    94/106

    (Exchange rate)

    On the other hand as the case describes, the valuation of U.S. externalassets and liabilities is affected by differences between U.S. and foreignequity market returns as well as exchange rates.

    The dollar exchange rate responds in a predictable, systematic mannerduring phases when the U.S. external position was unsustainable. Inother words, as the NIIP grows too large, the U.S. Dollar will depreciate in

    order to increase the value of U.S. external assets in response.

    The depreciation of U.S. Dollar in the early 2000s kept NIIP in check.

    Exhibit 11b shows the impact of the exchange rate in the valuation of theNIIP (See impact of the dollar depreciation in 2002 and 2003 on the netposition).

    Exhibit 11a, show that while CA deficit between 2001 &2007 totaled$4,242 billion, the NIIP deteriorated by only $573 billion over the sameperiod.

    The Value of accumulated financial flows

  • 7/28/2019 U.S. CA Case Study Lecture

    95/106

    (Exchange rate) (Cont.)

    Economist note that large gross cross-holding of foreignassets and liabilities means that the valuation channel of

    exchange rate adjustment has grown in importance, relative

    to the traditional trade balance channel. They also note that

    exchange rates have a much faster impact on the value netassets than on trade.

    Exhibit 12, demonstrate that this effect is mitigated

    somewhat by the fact that approximately 50% of foreign

    assets were denominated in U.S. dollar, so their value does

    not increase as the dollar depreciates.

    The Rest of the world and the role of managed

  • 7/28/2019 U.S. CA Case Study Lecture

    96/106

    g

    currencies in China (Asian Countries)

    Why are the Chinese accumulating so many dollar reserves? Why does China get from or out of this policy?

    Is this a match made in heaven: one country wants to have

    everything and keep its currency undervalued so that it can

    export, and another that just wants to consume in thepresent? What about Europe? Other Countries.

    Student Discussion

  • 7/28/2019 U.S. CA Case Study Lecture

    97/106

    Student Discussion

    Dollar pegged currencies

  • 7/28/2019 U.S. CA Case Study Lecture

    98/106

    Dollar-pegged currencies

    Dollar-pegged Asian countries plays important role in maintainingthe U.S. current account deficit.

    China played an important role in allowing the U.S. to maintain a

    high trade deficit. By pouring money into U.S. Bonds, the Chinese

    central bank was able to keep its exchange rate against the dollar

    stable and therefore grow U.S. import of Chinese products.

    This sratagy was adopted by the Chinese to allow its export sector

    to expand in order to incorporate millions of poor Chinse

    agricultural laborers in a major economic transformation of the

    country U.S. trade deficit with China were continually reaching new record

    levels as a result.

    Funding provided by Asian central banks to the

  • 7/28/2019 U.S. CA Case Study Lecture

    99/106

    U.S.

    Exhibits 9a, 9b, and 10, show the amounts of fundingprovided to the U.S. by selection of Asian Central Banks.

    Certain Economists dubbed it as a revived Bretton Woods

    explaining:

    The economic emergence of a fixed exchange rate periphery inAsia has re-established the United States as the center country in

    the Bretton Woods international monetary system.

    Sustainability of the U S Current Account

  • 7/28/2019 U.S. CA Case Study Lecture

    100/106

    Sustainability of the U.S. Current Account

    Is the U.S. Current Account deficit Sustainable? Is this a source of concern?

    Will all of this unravel?

    What is the worst case scenario economically?

    What is the worst case scenario Politically?

    Concept of Sustainable

  • 7/28/2019 U.S. CA Case Study Lecture

    101/106

    Concept of Sustainable

    From a domestic point of view : the current account trajectory issustainable if the impact of the current account balance and NIIP on GDPgrowth (through consumption and business investment) is weaker thanthe impact on GDP growth from other macro economic forces.

    Exhibit7: Shows, the U.S. had a fairly balanced share of equity

    and bonds in the liabilities. The U.S. liabilities are mostlydollar denominated.

    Exhibit 4a & Case discussion text: Foreign official investmentwhich would require interest payments in the future, hadbecome increasingly important in recent years.

    Feldstein in 2006 noted that public funds accounted for anaverage of only 14% of the capital inflow. He explains that thisis misleading.

  • 7/28/2019 U.S. CA Case Study Lecture

    102/106

    Several ways of evaluating how foreign investment flows intothe U.S. might continue.

    The U.S. current account absorbed only about 6% worlds

    savings, leaving the impression of plenty room for future

    investment in U.S. assets by foreigner.

    Student comment on board five (board 5)

  • 7/28/2019 U.S. CA Case Study Lecture

    103/106

    Student comment on board five (board 5)

    Sustainability of U S Current account deficit (Board 5)

  • 7/28/2019 U.S. CA Case Study Lecture

    104/106

    Sustainability of U.S. Current account deficit (Board 5)Sustainable

    Risk is borne by foreigners, who

    are holding the dollars.

    The 1980s fiscal deficits were as

    big

    Global financial markets

    Decreasing home bias

    Diversification finance, not

    development finance

    Attractive investment

    opportunities, high rates of return

    Global savings glut is here to stay

    U.S. safe haven

    Not Sustainable

    Not politically sustainable political

    vulnerabilities; behavioral; practice

    of foreign central banks.

    Not economically sustainable:

    Accounting

    The difference from previous

    episodes is the private savings,

    which have disappeared

    The Manufacturing base is

    disappearing

    The U.S.is financing consumption,

    not investment

    Increasing inequality withinU.S.

    (AFLCIO have stated the trade

    deficit is a weight around workers

    neck)

    Already the beginning of the end:

    world wide diversification from the

    dollar and dollar based assets

    Chinas Logic1. Keep the yen undervalued to grow2. Keep the U.S. economy importing

    3. Have lots of reserves to avoid a financial crisis

    Solutions to U S Current Account Deficit (6 C)

  • 7/28/2019 U.S. CA Case Study Lecture

    105/106

    Solutions to U.S. Current Account Deficit (6 C)

    US

    Increase savings

    -Private unlikely

    (Consumerism culture, low

    savings, feelings of high

    wealth, etc.

    -Public savings unlikely

    (commitment to lower taxes,

    social security, invasions,

    etc.)

    Push China to appreciate

    Grow

    ChinaUnilateral Appreciation

    -But the size of required n for

    a unilateral correction of the

    U.S. current account is

    proportional to 1/size

    -Unrealistic for one countryto take entire burden

    Europe-Save less /invest more

    -Grow the economy

    (important that growth takes

    place in the right sector

    tradable versus non-tradable)

    US+China+Europe+Rest of the World

  • 7/28/2019 U.S. CA Case Study Lecture

    106/106

    US+China+Europe+Rest of the World

    Policy Coordination Americans save more; adjust fiscal policy

    Europeans make structural changes to their economy toimprove growth

    Asians revalue collectively

    Everybody gets something

    Orderly solutions of global imbalances

    China able to prove it is a citizen of the world economy