U.S. ATLAS Physics and Computing Budget and Schedule Review John Huth Harvard University DOE/NSF Review of U.S. ATLAS and CMS Computing Projects Brookhaven

U.S. ATLAS Physics and ComputingBudget and Schedule Review

John Huth

Harvard University

DOE/NSF Review of U.S. ATLAS and CMS Computing Projects

Brookhaven National LaboratoryNOVEMBER 14-17, 2000

November 14-17, 2000J. Huth U.S. ATLAS Physics and Computing Project Status 2

Overall Budget Breakout

0

2000

4000

6000

8000

10000

12000

14000

FY 01 FY 02 FY 03 FY 04 FY05 FY06

Fiscal Year

FY

01

$K

Management Reserve

Physics

Facilities

Software


Budget and Guidance

0

5,000

10,000

15,000

20,000

AY k$

US Atlas Computing 3,972 4,880 6,245 7,808 10,471 14,510

Budget Guidance 3,000 4,000 5,500 8,500 13,500 17,500

FY 01 FY 02 FY 03 FY 04 FY05 FY06


DOE Profile and Guidance

US ATLAS Computing Project DOE Guidance vs. Project Profile

2,000

4,000

6,000

8,000

10,000

12,000

14,000

16,000

FY 01 FY 02 FY 03 FY 04 FY05 FY06

AY k $'s

Fisc

al Y

ear

Doe Profile and Reserve Doe Guidance


Cumulative Profile

US ATLAS Computing ProjectCumulative Funding

10

20

30

40

50

60

FY 01 FY 02 FY 03 FY 04 FY05 FY06

Fiscal Year

AY

M$'

s

US Atlas ComputingBudget Guidance


Profile Comments

• Details of profile still in progress

– Understand thoroughly all components

• Years 01, 02 and 03 short relative to guidance

– Impact on software particularly severe

– DOE funded portion short in all years but 04 (Labs) Consequence of Regional Center ramp in 05 and 06

– NB – this assumes that NSF funds for Tier 2’s come from other

sources than guidance In years 04, 05 and 06, could be directed to Tier 2’s


FY 01 and 02 Requests

Funding Categories FY 01 FY 02

Estimate of DOE Funding Requirements 3,493 4,323Estimate of NSF Funding Requirements 460 617US ATLAS Core Computing Project Subtotal 3,953 4,940Distributed IT Infrastructure (Tier II) 412 1,255Summary Total 4,365 6,195

AY k$'s


FTE Count

Proposed Project Funded FTE's FY 01 FY 02Physics 1 1Software 12.9 15.5Facilities Tier I 4.4 5.8 Tier II 1.1 1.7

Proposed Infrastructure Funded FTE'sDistributed IT Infrastructure (Tier II) 1 5

Summary FTE Total 20.4 29


Build to Cost: Identified Areas

• Overall: scale back on requirements– Software:

Degree of grid automation Overall requirements

» (e.g. carrying two vs. one DB product) Shifting personnel

» (e.g. CERN location of SW pros)

– Hardware Reduction of scope of RC… Delay of purchases – Moore’s law Alternative data-analysis strategies

Comment: user part of facilities is conservative

N.B. – the quantitative implications are still under study


Summary

• Functional Organization

– Software effort backbone of Intl. ATLAS

– Regional Center operational, in use by users

• International ATLAS planning on track

– Software agreements, facilities planning

• Grid tasks beginning

– U.S. ATLAS Testbed

• Funding profile must be addressed

November 14-17, 2000

Schedule Milestones

November 14-17, 2000

Summary Information FY 01 & FY 02

Funding Categories FY 01 FY 02

Estimate of DOE Funding Requirements 3,493 4,323

Estimate of NSF Funding Requirements 460 617

US ATLAS Core Computing Project Subtotal 3,953 4,940

Distributed IT Infrastructure (Tier II) 412 1,255

Summary Total 4,365 6,195

Proposed Project Funded FTE's FY 01 FY 02

Physics 1 1

Software 12.9 15.5

Facilities

Tier I 4.4 5.8

Tier II 1.1 1.7

Proposed Infrastructure Funded FTE's

Distributed IT Infrastructure (Tier II) 1 5

Summary FTE Total 20.4 29

FY 01 FY 02

Core Funded Facilities Purchases 639 579

Distributed IT Facilities Purchases 324 565

AY k$'s

FTE

AY k$'s


NSF and DOE Split

US ATLAS Computing Project DOE and NSF Funding Split

0

2,000

4,000

6,000

8,000

10,000

12,000

14,000

16,000

Fiscal Years

AY

k$'

s

NSF Management Reserve

NSF Estimated Profile

DoE Management Reserve

DoE Estimated Profile

NSF Management Reserve 42 55 55 55 55 55

NSF Estimated Profile 418 562 578 593 609 625

DoE Management Reserve 318 393 516 644 853 1,249

DoE Estimated Profile 3,175 3,930 5,161 6,438 8,535 12,490

FY 01 FY 02 FY 03 FY 04 FY05 FY06


Cost Categories

• Advanced Information Technology

Professional

• Information Technology Professional

I

• Information Technology Professional

II

• Information Technology Technician

• Student

• Travel

• Stores

• Space

• Power

• Low value materials

• High value materials

• Licenses

• Maintenance

• Consulting

• Technical services

• Administrative service


Functional OverviewCost/Schedule Control System

Institutions

Terminal

Escalation Procedure

MS Project 98Baseline

(Resource LoadedSchedules)

Cost Reporting(WBS Level 5)

Report Generator

Update Procedure

ACCESS Database

CSSR Procedure

• WBS• WBS Dictionary• Estimate - Labor - Material - Travel• Rates• Contingency• Cost Books• MOUs• Project/NSF/Base/ Infrastructure• Funding Source

CSSR atWBS Level 3WBS Level 5

BCWS/BCWP

Cumulative CostMonthly Cost

Reports

Escalation RatesDOE

Reports

Schedules

S/S Mgr. Status Data

Baseline

MS Project 98Statused

(Resource LoadedSchedules)

ProjectionsProcedure

FY Fundingby Institution

Status Sheets

1 2 3

4 5

6 7

8 9

10

11

12 13 14

15 16 17

18


Change Control

SubsystemManager

Defines Need forBaseline Change

Proposal(BCP)

Associate ProjectManager Review

Change ControlBoard Review

ATLASCERN

DOE/NSF

Change ControlOffice

Prepares BCP

Updates ControlDocuments

BCP LogContingency Log

Milestone LogCost Baseline Log

U.S. ATLAS Change Control Process

Distribution

Approved

Rejected

Approved/Rejected

10/9/97

Revisions

CCProcess.vsd

ATLAS CERN


Grid vs. Athena Services

Craig TullNERSC/LBL

Athena and Grids: http://documents.cern.ch/age?a00380


Calren Esnet, Abilene, Nton

Abilene

Esnet, Mren

UC BerkeleyLBNL-NERSC

Esnet

NPACI, Abilene

BrookhavenNationalLaboratory

Indiana University

Boston University

ArgonneNationalLaboratory

Initial Participants

HPSS sites

U Michigan

University ofTexas atArlington

SUNYAlbany