Upload
phamnhan
View
217
Download
3
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
US Army Corps of Engineers
BUILDING STRONG®
CHARLESTON MOBILE WILMINGTON SAVANNAH JACKSONVILLE
South Atlantic Division US Army Corps of Engineers
“People, Projects, and Priorities”
Society of American Military Engineers Robins Air Force Base Post Warner Robins, GA 14 February 2012 MG Todd T. Semonite Commanding General South Atlantic Division US Army Corps of Engineers
BUILDING STRONG®
USACE Program Areas
FY11 Military Program $ 24.8 B (SAD $3.1 B)
11,100 personnel (SAD 1293)
Military Construction
Contingency Operations
Installation Support
International and (SAD $370M) Interagency Support
FY11 Civil Works Program $ 6.65 B (SAD $1.0B)
22,600 personnel (SAD 2303) Navigation
Hydropower Flood Risk Management
Shore Protection
Ecosystem Restoration
Emergency Management Water Supply
Regulatory Recreation
+ $2B in support to other agencies
Engineer Research and Development Center $1.5 B
2300 personnel
45 Districts ( Project Funded )
9 Divisions ( Direct Funded )
Homeland Security
Environmental
Real Estate
Private Industry Partners
HQ
Engineer Commands
U.S. Army Geospatial Center $365 M
200 personnel
BUILDING STRONG®
ARCTIC
ANTARCTIC
USACE Global Engagement Engagement: 100+ countries Physical Presence: 34 countries
BUILDING STRONG®
SAD FY11 ACCOMPLISHMENTS = EXCEPTIONAL RESULTS
About $5.983 billion in obligations
Civil Works – $1.37 B in obligations - regular, supplemental & ARRA
Military Programs – $3.1 B in obligations - MILCON, BRAC, ECIP & ARRA ► Awarded all assigned Military ARRA projects - 164 projects valued over $281M.
Environmental
► FUDS – $46.7 M obligated - exceeded expectations for contract awards, phase completions and project completions
► Active Installation Restoration, BRAC Environmental – $36.7 M obligated
► Environmental Quality –$67.9 M obligated
Critically needed facilities and invaluable jobs for our region
BUILDING STRONG®
SAD Implementation Plan
Objective 1a:
Objective 1b:
Objective 1c:
Objective 1d:
Objective 3a:
Objective 3b:
Objective 3c:
Objective 3d:
What will YOU do to make SAD GREAT?
Goal 1 Goal 2 Goal 3 Goal 4
Ready, Responsive, and Reliable 1a.1 Field Force Engineering Tms 1a.2 Spt Overseas Contingencies 1a.3 National & Regional
Operating & Generating Force 1b.1 Support to the Regiment, Army and Expeditionary Forces
HR & Family Readiness Execution 1c.1 Family Readiness Program
Interagency Policy & Doctrine 1d.1 Support to COCOMs
Objective 2a: Deliver Water Resource Solutions 2a.1 Transform CW Planning 2a.2 Restore the Everglades
Objective 2b: Collaborative Approaches 2b.1 Watershed Management
Objective 2c: Streamline Regulatory Processes 2c.1 Regulatory Program Improvements
Objective 2d: Enable Gulf Coast Recovery 2d.1 Implement MsCIP
MILCON & Real Estate Actions 3a.1 Full Spectrum Support 3a.2 Interagency & International 3a.3 Energy Design Strategy
Critical Infrastructure 3b.1 Dam & Levee Safety
Infrastructure Investments 3c.1 Asset Management Process 3c.2 Navigation Priorities & Processes
Innovative Solutions 3d.1 Contract Delivery & Construction Techniques
Objective 4a:
Technical Competencies 4a.1 Technical Competency Plan
Objective 4b:
Strategic Communications 4b.1 Communications Program
Objective 4c: Standard Business Processes 4c.1 Implement QMS 4c.2 Regional Workload Sharing 4c.3 Centers of Expertise
Objective 4d:
Human Capital Program 4d.1 Human Capital Strategy
A GREAT engineering force of highly disciplined people working with our partners through disciplined thought and action to deliver innovative and sustainable solutions to the Nation’s engineering challenges.
Provide vital public engineering services in peace and war to strengthen our Nation’s security, energize the economy and reduce risks from disasters.
• Delivering superior performance. • Setting the standard for the profession. • Making a positive impact on the Nation and other nations. • Being built to last by having a strong "bench" of educated, trained, competent, experienced, and certified professionals.
SAD Mission GREAT is USACE Vision
Deliver USACE support to combat, stability and disaster operations through forward deployed and
reach back capabilities.
Deliver enduring and essential water resource solutions through collaboration
with partners and stakeholders.
Deliver innovative, resilient, sustainable solutions to the
Armed Forces and the Nation.
Build and cultivate a competent, disciplined, and resilient team equipped
to deliver high quality solutions.
FY 2012
BUILDING STRONG®
National Priorities/Goals • Reduce the Deficit1
• Create Jobs and Restore the Economy1
• Improve Infrastructure1
• Restore and Protect the Environment1
• Maintain Global Competitiveness2
• Increase Energy Independence2
• Improve Quality of Life2
• Protect National Interests3
• Rebalance Toward Asia-Pacific Region, while Evolving European Posture3
1FY2011 CW Budget Briefings to OMB 2President’s 2011 State of the Union Address 3Sustaining Global Leadership/Jan 2012
NOTE: This listing is a listing of priorities/goals, not a ranking.
BUILDING STRONG®
SAD Strategic Crossroads
3,547
3,260
3,462
3,751 3,759 3,821
3,450
CIVIL WORKS MILITARY & IIS FTE
Total Program FY 08 - 14
$2.7B
$4.7B
$5.8B $5.4B
$3.8B
$3.3B $2.7B
0
1,000
2,000
3,000
4,000
5,000
6,000
7,000
FY08 FY09 FY10 FY11-R FY12-I FY13 FY14
Civil Works Military & IIS
($) M
illio
ns
BUILDING STRONG® 9 8
AGING INFRASTRUCTURE
UNRELIABLE RESOURCE ENGINES
CONSTRUCTION COSTS
WORKFORCE TRENDS
UNRELIABLE RESOURCE ENGINES
CONSTRUCTION COSTS
WORKFORCE TRENDS
AGING INFRASTRUCTURE
OCO MISSIONS
OCO EXTENDED TO 2014
OCO FUNDING MIGRATION TO BASE
MIDDLE EAST UNREST
FEDERAL DEFICT /
SUPER COMMITTEE FAILURE
MILCON REDUCTION
FY 12 – 15
FY12 CRA / OMA REDUCTION
EARMARK RESTRICTIONS
FY12 CIVIL WORKS REDUCTION
BUILDING STRONG®
Readiness (Overseas Ops) OCO Support (As of: 19 Jan 2012)
► Total Workforce Deployed: 79 ► Deployments (TAG/TAN/TAS): 74 ► Deployments to Non-USACE Response
Organizations: 5 ► Deployments Scheduled within the next 90 days: 24
Field Force Engineering Teams
► SAS FEST-A (542nd Eng Det) – OEF (Dec 2012) ► SAM FEST-A and BDT – OEF (Apr 2012) ► CREST and ENVST – All districts Support the
teams (Annual training in Feb 2012)
Supporting overseas missions while executing massive missions at home
BUILDING STRONG®
Readiness (Natural Disasters) Planning and
Response Teams
► SAJ Temporary Roofing Temporary Housing
► SAC Ice
► SAM Debris
► SAW Commodities
► SAS Emergency Power
Building an all-encompassing regional contingency force
A USACE urban search and rescue team searches a small void in the Hotel Montana for
victims of the 7.0 earthquake in Haiti
Removed 5,299,167 CY of debris from homes in Tuscaloosa, Alabama
Hurricane Irene left extensive flood and wind damage after making landfall over Eastern
North Carolina’s Outer Banks
HQS-UOC Reach Back Center, Managed out of Mobile District
BUILDING STRONG®
South Atlantic Division Boundaries (Civil Works)
31 Lakes (6 of 10 most visited) 1268 Miles of Levees 49 Dams Total (14 FDR) Hydropower – 2nd in Capacity
(14 plants in 5 states) 32 Deep Draft Harbors 32 Locks Everglades $756 M
Mobile District
Wilmington District
Jacksonville District
Charleston District
Savannah District
Division Headquarters Atlanta
Puerto Rico US Virgin Islands
FY07-FY11 Civil Works Program $3.9B in 5 years!!
BUILDING STRONG®
Navigation $1.653 B 40%
Hydropower $207 M 7%
CIVIL WORKS PROGRAM PRESERVING THE STRENGTH OF THE NATION
Deliver enduring, comprehensive, sustainable & integrated solutions to the
Nation’s water resources & related challenges through collaboration with
our stakeholders: Regions, States, localities, Tribes & Federal agencies
Flood Risk Management $1.545 B 28%
Ecosystem Restoration $586 M 11%
Water Supply $4 M < 1%
Regulatory Program: Wetlands & Waterways
$193 M 4%
Recreation & Natural Resources Management
$280 M 6%
Disaster Preparedness & Response
$43 M 1%
BUILDING STRONG®
Civil Program Highlights Everglades:
• $18.0 billion over 20 years • Master Agreement signed
Post-Panamax Harbor Deepening: • Intense competition among deep-draft ports • Synchronization of National Plan/Economics • SAD Priorities: Savannah, Miami, Charlestown
Mississippi Coastal Improvement • $1.1 billion over 10 years • Large scale buyout of coastal areas
Environment and infrastructure hand in hand
BUILDING STRONG®
Port Deepening – Savannah, Charleston, & Miami
In preparation for Post Panamax sized ships
Charleston Harbor (Currently 45 feet)
Savannah Harbor (Currently 42 feet)
Miami Harbor (Currently 42 feet)
BUILDING STRONG®
Savannah Harbor Expansion Study Total Project Amount: $ 660M
Herbert Hoover Dike Total Project Amount: $ 2.1B
Portuguese Dam Total Project Amount: $ 805M
Major Civil Works Projects
Mississippi Coastal Improvement Total Project Amount: $ 687M
BUILDING STRONG®
Adaptive Water Management
Water is the key resource for the nation’s future
R.F. Henry L&D
Millers Ferry L&D
Lake Allatoona
Carters Lake
Claiborne
Lake Lanier/ Buford Dam
West Point Lake
Andrews L&D
Lake Seminole/ Woodruff Dam
Walter F. George Lake
DIVISION CDR THEMES
• Demand for WATER SUPPLY will continue to EXPAND regionally and nationally • Need for COLLABORATION absolutely CRITICAL • Costs & Benefits must reflect environmental values •Must balance all authorized project purposes
ACF Remand – Schedule
Legal/technical opinion in 12 months that will likely include: • Corps ability to meet current WS ops and GA2000 request • How Corps will address return flows
Schedule 2011 – 2012: • July – Aug Develop analysis methodology & opinion framework • Sept – Feb Modeling, PDT identification & analysis of impacts; initial drafting of opinion • Mar – Apr ATR of technical analysis, opinion QA • Mar – Apr Final drafting of opinion, submission to court
Pre-Decisional Advice/Deliberative Process Exempt Under FOIA/Do Not Forward, Copy or Release Under FOIA
BUILDING STRONG®
FY07-FY11 Military Construction Program $14.5B in 5 years!!
11 Major Army Posts 13 Major Air Force Bases 6 Major Commands 32% Army CONUS 18% Air Force
South Atlantic Division Boundaries (Military Construction)
FL
GA SC
AL
NC TN
MS
South America
Central America
Savannah
Mobile
Puerto Rico & US Virgin Islands
Wilmington
Charleston
NC TN
Jacksonville
USASOC/JSOC MILCON at Fort Bragg: Wilmington District Ft Bragg (less USASOC and JSOC) and Seymour Johnson AFB : Savannah District
BUILDING STRONG®
MILITARY PROGRAMS PROVIDING INFRASTRUCTURE SOLUTIONS TO THE ARMED FORCES AND THE NATION
Deliver innovative, resilient & sustainable infrastructure solutions to support military readiness & strategic national interests.
Military Construction
Overseas Contingency Operations (OCO)
Real Estate
Environmental & Formerly Used Defense Sites (FUDS)
Base Realignment & Closure (BRAC)
Installation Support
Interagency & International Services (IIS)
BRAC 133 Mark Center, Arlington, VA Border Fence, Imperial Sand Dunes, CA
Army Strategic Command HQ, Peterson AFB, CO
Movement of Armor School Ft Benning PA: $159M
Brigade Combat Team Complex Fort Stewart Cost: $41M
Hospital Fort Benning Cost: $375M
7th Special Group Headquarters Eglin AFB
Cost: $347M
BUILDING STRONG®
Sustainability for the Future Four Star Headquarters Facilities – $781M
FORSCOM/USARC $300M
CENTCOM $117M SOUTHCOM $237M
AMC $127M
Provide better facilities for Warfighters – on time and on budget!
BUILDING STRONG®
Sustainability for the Future LEED Platinum Facilities at Ft. Bragg & Tyndall AFB
Fitness Facility – Tyndall AFB First LEED Platinum in Air Force - $8.7M
Community Emergency Service Station Ft. Bragg – First LEED Platinum in USACE – $2.9M
Leveraging technology for better management
BUILDING STRONG®
International and Interagency Support Program OCONUS CONUS
CONUS Customers • Environmental Protection Agency • Dept of Veterans Affairs • Immigration and Customs enforcement • FBI • Government Printing Office • NASA • Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms • Federal Aviation Administration • Federal Emergency Management Agency • Department of Energy, NNSA (PDCF) • Federal Law Enforcement
FBI Hazardous Devices Training Facility
Panama
El Salvador
LATAM Countries Currently Worked Resident Offices
Honduras
Bolivia Bolivia
Colombia
Peru
Ecuador
Paraguay
Guatemala
Uruguay
Chile
Argentina
Costa Rica
Nicaragua
Belize
International Programs Area of Operations
Central and South America (Mobile District) • SOUTHCOM
– Soto Cano (Army/Air Force) • Ambassadors • U.S. Military Groups • Other U.S. Agencies (USAID) • Others:
– Counter Drug Programs (U.S. State Dept.) – Humanitarian Organizations
• Brazil – 234 Agreement (Host nation agreement between a U.S. Federal agency and a foreign nation)
Executing $62 M working on more than 100 projects in 14 countries
BUILDING STRONG®
IIS – SFO (Largest Customers)
Customer FY09($M)
FY10($M)
FY11($M)
FY12 (Projection)($M)
HQ SOUTHCOM (SAM/SAJ) $19.3 $30.0 $25.4 $25.0FBI (SAM) $0.6 $103.0 $0.0 $80.0NASA (SAM) $28.0 $63.0 $23.3 $70.0EPA (Multi) $1.7 $6.3 $16.7 $18.6FEMA (SAM/SAW) $1.8 $9.0 $0.6 $0.5DLA (SAC/SAJ/SAM) $3.0 $22.1 $78.3 $75.0Navy (SAJ) $20.3 $20.7 $17.0 $17.0Marine Forces Reserve (SAC) $10.0 $40.9 $36.5 $18.6Department of State (SAC) $8.0 $0.0 $7.3 $0.0DOE/Nat'l Nuclear Sec Admin (SAC) $4.0 $3.1 $1.8 $1.8Veterans Administration (SAC/SAJ/SAM) $37.0 $8.4 $61.5 $8.4National Park Service (SAW) $0.0 $0.0 $0.1 $2.1
$133.7 $306.5 $268.5 $317.0
BUILDING STRONG®
USACE Engagement with Brazil USACE will be supporting Brazilian engineers and CODEVASF (Development Agency for the Valleys of São Francisco & Parnaiba) for the next 3 years
► Purpose: advise on waterway navigation improvement to the São Francisco River ► USACE provides a two person office with full reach-back capabilities ► Brazil funds project at $1.3M per year
Signing of FAA 607 Agreement between USACE and CODEVASF – 14 Dec 2011 ► In attendance will be U.S. Ambassador, Brazilian Ministers of National Integration and Transportation
From concept to execution less than six months ► Defense Security Cooperation Agency granted an exception to policy for payment plan IAW Foreign Assistance Act 607
BUILDING STRONG®
TECHNICAL COMPETENCE
Build and cultivate a competent, disciplined, and resilient team equipped to deliver high quality solutions.
• Prioritize and prepare implementation of “27 Actions to Enhance USACE Technical Competency.” • Increase in-house work to enhance technical competency
• Emphasize and recognize Registrations, Certifications, and Licenses
• Develop relationships with local universities
Trained & Competent people are absolutely essential for our GREAT reputation – MAINTAIN THE EDGE!!
BUILDING STRONG®
HUMAN CAPITAL PLAN
Continuous workforce shaping options for “right-sizing” actions
Regional Team Communication efforts to continually update the workload process – Shaping and adjusting as the future changes
Suggested Way Ahead: • Continue Development of Process to address continual recent changes • Development of Regional Acquisition Strategy Board tool and review of tech competencies to address in-house workload
• Regional Management Board briefed by SAD Technical Chiefs – addressing staffing levels and regional workload • Regional Management Board Project Delivery Team assigned to review regional military workload changes
Make USACE the employer of choice
BUILDING STRONG®
USACE Take-Aways
We Support the Nation: Globally, where we are located Expertly, through world-class civilians and soldiers Rapidly, whether new challenges or disasters, with in-house & contractor forces sized & mobilized to meet the demand
BUILDING STRONG®
Division Commander Perspective • Enhance Partnership between Districts & DPWs
► Dwindling budgets, can’t afford redundancy, leverage capabilities, symbiotic ► Training, Master Planning, SRM, Real Property, Environmental
• Expanding Support Beyond Routine SRM ► Unique places – SOUTHCOM, SOCSOUTH, Soto Cano ► USACE Proof of concept: MARFORRES, 81 RSC, DLA
• Mega Building Maintenance and Operation ► Large HQs Buildings: FORSCOM, SOUTHCOM, AMC, Maneuver Center ► Expand Design, Build with Sustain by adding 5 year O&M support contract to all >$100M facilities
• Alignment of USACE and IMCOM Missions ► Historic Realignments: DOL to AMC, Utilities, Housing, Lodging Privatization, Commercialization Activities (A76)
► Merging of DPW and USACE functions (e.g. area offices support energy, privatization, enterprise contracting, etc)
• Risk of Loss of Region ► Multiple installations direct report to IMCOM HQs, No geographical presence ► Potential SAD pilot to provide regional / geographic DPW support to HQs (e.g. regional support contracts, engagement with Senior Commanders)