3
US Air Travel – An Example of Materialization Arnulf Gruëbler, Paul E. Waggoner and Jesse H. Ausubel The International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, Vienna; The Connecticut Agricultural Experiment Station, New Haven; and The Rockefeller University, New York. November, 2002 We assess data involving US air travel in two forms. P is population, A is income ($/capita), C is consumption (passenger km/$), and T is technological efficiency (fuel/km). First, we show the courses of P, A, C and T since 1970. We show the data at 5-year intervals because 1) we want an extended span and 2) 5-year intervals capture the significant matters without the confusion of 1 and Air 1970/2000 per 1970 -1.20 -1.00 -0.80 -0.60 -0.40 -0.20 0.00 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 ln() P A C T Behavior differs between two periods: 1970-1980 and 1980-2000. In the first, a 7% per year improvement of T (fuel / passenger km) countered the 5% per year increase in travel (C, passenger km/$), keeping fuel use (Impact) almost unchanged. Since 1980, T improved more slowly, and so the 5% per year rise of travel (C) increased fuel use about 3% per year.

US Air Travel – An Example of Materialization

  • Upload
    tehya

  • View
    13

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

US Air Travel – An Example of Materialization Arnulf Gru ëbler, Paul E. Waggoner and Jesse H. Ausubel The International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, Vienna; The Connecticut Agricultural Experiment Station, New Haven; and The Rockefeller University, New York. November, 2002 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: US Air Travel – An Example of Materialization

US Air Travel – An Example of Materialization

Arnulf Gruëbler, Paul E. Waggoner and Jesse H. Ausubel

The International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, Vienna; The Connecticut Agricultural Experiment Station, New Haven; and The Rockefeller University, New

York.

November, 2002

We assess data involving US air travel in two forms. P is population, A is income ($/capita), C is consumption (passenger km/$), and T is technological efficiency (fuel/km). First, we show the courses of P, A, C and T since 1970. We show the data at 5-year intervals because 1) we want an extended span and 2) 5-year intervals capture the significant matters without the confusion of 1 and 5- year spans on the same chart.

Air 1970/2000 per 1970

-1.20-1.00-0.80-0.60-0.40-0.200.000.200.400.600.801.00

1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000ln()

P

A

C

T

Behavior differs between two periods: 1970-1980 and 1980-2000. In the first, a 7% per year improvement of T (fuel / passenger km) countered the 5% per year increase in travel (C, passenger km/$), keeping fuel use (Impact) almost unchanged. Since 1980, T improved more slowly, and so the 5% per year rise of travel (C) increased fuel use about 3% per year.

Page 2: US Air Travel – An Example of Materialization

Population GDP Travel (km) Fuel (Im)1970/1980 1.11% 3.15% 7.09% 0.17%1980/2000 0.95% 3.21% 4.86% 3.41%

Im P A C T1970/1980 0.17% 1.11% 2.04% 3.95% -6.93%1980/2000 3.41% 0.95% 2.26% 1.65% -1.45%

The annual change in the basic parameters.

The annual change in the ImPACT parameters.

Page 3: US Air Travel – An Example of Materialization

We set out to find a good that ‘materialized’. The clear increase of C (km/GDP) indicates air travel serves our purpose. So we insert air travel in the concluding chart of our Supplement to ImPACT, Patterns, also posted on this site.

Diverse paths

-1.50

-1.00

-0.50

0.00

0.50

1.00

1.50

-1.00 -0.50 0.00 0.50 1.00

C %/yr

T %

/yr

Cropland Nitrogen Fert. Irrigated Water

CO2 Cement Lumber

Life Expectancy Air Travel

Air travel’s purple course of T versus C to the southeast serves our purpose. It exemplifies materialization and improved efficiency even better than the black course for medical expenditure and life expectancy. Unlike the medical example, in which materialization and improved efficiency, measured as increased years of life per expenditure, slowed, air travel continued to materialize and grow more efficient over time.