41
Updates on Fire Blight Research and Management Options Mohammad Babadoost University of Illinois Email: [email protected]

Updates on Fire Blight Research and Management Options

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    1

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Updates on Fire Blight Research and Management Options

Updates on Fire Blight Research and Management Options

Mohammad Babadoost

University of Illinois

Email: [email protected]

Page 2: Updates on Fire Blight Research and Management Options

Major Apple Disease Problems in

Illinois in 2011 _______________________________________

Scab

Fire Blight*

Fruit Rots

Bitter Rot

White Rot

Page 3: Updates on Fire Blight Research and Management Options

Fire Blight Symptoms ___________________________

Blossom blight

Fruit blight

Shoot blight*

Canker

Rootstock blight

Page 4: Updates on Fire Blight Research and Management Options

Blossom blight

Page 5: Updates on Fire Blight Research and Management Options

Fruit blight

Page 6: Updates on Fire Blight Research and Management Options

Shoot blight

Page 7: Updates on Fire Blight Research and Management Options

Canker

Page 8: Updates on Fire Blight Research and Management Options

Rootstock blight

Page 9: Updates on Fire Blight Research and Management Options

Apple fire blight – losing trees

APAnet

Page 10: Updates on Fire Blight Research and Management Options

Apple Fire Blight in Illinois ___________________________________________

2008: widespread and severe infection

2009: widespread and severe infection

2010: low incidence

2011: low incidence

Page 11: Updates on Fire Blight Research and Management Options

http://www.caf.wvu.edu/kearneysville/disease_descriptions/fire_blight_disease_cycle.htm Modified by J. Norelli

Page 12: Updates on Fire Blight Research and Management Options

Control of Fire Blight of Apple _________________________________________

Copper application at silver-tip

Streptomycin applications at bloom

Streptomycin application as

predicted by MARYBLIT or

Cougar Blight

Streptomycin application after hail

damage

Page 13: Updates on Fire Blight Research and Management Options

Control of Fire Blight of Apple _____________________________________

Streptomycin is the most

effective chemical for control

of fire blight

Page 14: Updates on Fire Blight Research and Management Options

Streptomycin for Fire Blight of Apple ___________________________________________

1950s: Streptomycin use began

1971: Streptomycin-resistance in

California

By 2010: Streptomycin-resistance in

western US, Michigan, New York,

Canada, Israel

Page 15: Updates on Fire Blight Research and Management Options

Apple Fire Blight in Illinois ______________________________________

In 2010, we initiated a research

to determine whether there are

streptomycin-resistant strains

of the causal bacterium

(Erwinia amylovora)

Page 16: Updates on Fire Blight Research and Management Options

Orchards

surveyed in

2010 (24)

Orchards

surveyed in

2011 (35)

Page 17: Updates on Fire Blight Research and Management Options

Isolating bacteria from blossoms

Grind tissue

Page 18: Updates on Fire Blight Research and Management Options

Remove bark

Grind tissue

Isolating bacteria

from shoots

Page 19: Updates on Fire Blight Research and Management Options

PCR Identification:

Primers AJ 75/76; targeting plasmid pEA 29 (McManus and Jones, 1995)

MK1

68D

42B

45E

47C

75A

48A

NOT EA

28A

165E

166B

EA

Page 20: Updates on Fire Blight Research and Management Options

Moist Chamber (7 days)

5 replications/ isolate

Pathogenicity test in pear

Page 21: Updates on Fire Blight Research and Management Options
Page 22: Updates on Fire Blight Research and Management Options

Pathogenicity test in pear

Page 23: Updates on Fire Blight Research and Management Options

IL E. amylovora isolates (7 days)

Page 24: Updates on Fire Blight Research and Management Options

2010- E. amylovora Pathogenicity on immature pear fruit 7 days post inoculation ( 107 CFU )

County Isolate Mean Lesion

Diameter (mm) County Isolate

Mean Lesion

Diameter (mm)

Boone 193b 0.3 Macoupin 10c 4.5

196b 0.3

Marshall

108d 3.7

Calhoun

49c 3.8 118b 2.6

45d 2.2 111c 1.0

15a 1.7 Putnam 170c 1.2

68d 1.7 Sangamon 84d 1.9

26d 1.3

St. Clair

93c 4.6

38c 1.3 89a 4.1

Champaign 2a 1.7 128c 3.7

Jersey

75a 4.3 127b 3.0

30b 3.0 Woodford 165e 2.5

28b 2.6 mk1 0.9

Page 25: Updates on Fire Blight Research and Management Options

2011- E. amylovora Pathogenicity on immature pear fruit 7 days post inoculation ( 107 CFU )

County Isolate

Mean Lesion

Diameter (mm) County Isolate

Mean Lesion

Diameter (mm)

Boone

6951 5.7 Kane 4951 2.5

7101 5.7 Madison 5472 4.9

7071 5.2 Marshall

7841 5.3

Calhoun

7651 5.5 7501 4.1

7621 5 Peoria 7461 4.9

6081 4.4 Putnam 7691 4.8

7571 3.9 St Clair

5461 6.6

7751 3.2 5752 5.3

Champaign 4802 1.8 Union

5152 3.2

Jackson 5341 3.9 5232 3.2

Jersey

6002 4.3 Woodford

7711 8.9 *

7671 3.1 7731 5

7531 3 mk1 2.6

Page 26: Updates on Fire Blight Research and Management Options

Results of Pathogenicity Tests ________________________________________

All Illinois isolates were pathogenic,

the lesion sizes were different in

pear. We are investigating the

differences.

Page 27: Updates on Fire Blight Research and Management Options

Testing Erwinia amylovora

Isolates for

Streptomycin-Resistance

Page 28: Updates on Fire Blight Research and Management Options

Agri-Mycin 17 Erwinia amylovora isolates:

Illinois isolates Michigan streptomycin-

resistant 0 ppm 25 ppm

50 ppm 100 ppm

Page 29: Updates on Fire Blight Research and Management Options

2010 Streptomycin Resistance Status Report

County

Strikes

Erwinia amylovora

isolates (no)

Erwinia amylovora colony

50ppm

Boone 15 9 0

Calhoun 36 63 0

Champaign 6 12 0

Jersey 29 33 0

Kane 11 8 0

Macoupin 9 13 0

Madison 10 0 0

Marshall 16 24 0

McHenry 6 3 0

Peoria 11 2 0

Putnam 10 10 0

Sangamon 6 4 0

St. Clair 42 31 0

Winnebago 4 5 0

Woodford 7 8 0

Totals 218 225 0

Page 30: Updates on Fire Blight Research and Management Options

2011 Streptomycin Resistance Status Report

County

Blossoms &

Strikes

Erwinia amylovora

isolates (no)

Erwinia amylovora colony

50ppm

Boone 23 10 0

Calhoun 98 25 0

Champaign 49 18 0

Dekalb 0 - -

Jackson 22 8 0

Jefferson 7 0 -

Jersey 54 11 0

Kane 11 3 0

Macoupin 6 - -

Madison 11 5 0

Marshall 29 8 0

McHenry 15 0 -

Peoria 29 7 0

Page 31: Updates on Fire Blight Research and Management Options

2011 Streptomycin Resistance Status Report- continues

County

Blossoms &

Strikes

Erwinia amylovora

isolates (no)

Erwinia amylovora colony

50ppm

Piatt 1 0 -

Pope 0 - -

Putnam 16 3 0

Randolph 3 0 -

St. Clair 55 16 0

Union 39 12 0

Winnebago 5 0 -

Woodford 15 3 0

Total (21) 488 129 0

Page 32: Updates on Fire Blight Research and Management Options

Studies during 2010-2011

showed no streptomycin-

resistance of fire blight

bacterium in Illinois. The

study will continue in 2012.

Page 33: Updates on Fire Blight Research and Management Options

Kocide 3000 (0.23 g/ L)

Kocide-3000 Erwinia amylovora isolates:

2010 and 2011 Control

Page 34: Updates on Fire Blight Research and Management Options

We are still evaluating the

isolates for resistance to

copper compounds, but so

far, no resistance has been

detected.

Page 35: Updates on Fire Blight Research and Management Options

Chemical Testing in Lab - Results ___________________________________________

85 IL E. amylovora tested in 2010 and 2011

No resistance to streptomycin at 25 ppm

No resistance to oxytetracyline

(Mycoshield) at 50 ppm

No resistance to Kasugomycin

(Kasumin 2L) at 100 ppm (under study)

No resistance to Kocide-3000 at 0.16 mM

No resistance to copper sulfate at 0.16 mM

Page 36: Updates on Fire Blight Research and Management Options

Field testing of chemicals for control

of fire blight of apple ___________________________________________

Testing in 2011

UIUC experimental orchard, Urbana (IL)

Jonathan apple, inoculated

Trees were inoculated twice

Chemicals were applied 24 pre-inoculation

and 24 post- inoculation

Page 37: Updates on Fire Blight Research and Management Options
Page 38: Updates on Fire Blight Research and Management Options
Page 39: Updates on Fire Blight Research and Management Options

2011 Field Testing of Chemicals for Fire Blight Control

Treatment Application time No. Infected Clusters (120/tree)

Seranade Max Pre-inoculation 28.7 bcde

Serenade Max Post-inoculation 46.3 a c

Blightban A506 Pre-inoculation 37.7 abc

Blightban A506 Post-inoculation 41.3 ab

Control (no inoculation) - 37.3 abc

Control (inoculation) - 35.0 abcd

Mycoshield Pre-inoculation 39.7 abc

Mycoshield Post-inoculation 29.3 bcde

Agrimycin 17 Pre-inoculation 27.3 bcde

Agrimycin 17 Post-inoculation 19.3 e

Kasumin 2L Pre-inoculation 19.3 e

Kasumin 2L Post-inoculation 21.0 de

Ary-0416-06 Pre-inoculation 26.0 cde

Ary-0416-06 Post-inoculation 16.3 e

Page 40: Updates on Fire Blight Research and Management Options

The information is form

the research results by

Andre Jurgens

(Graduate Student)

Page 41: Updates on Fire Blight Research and Management Options

Questions/

Comments