Upload
owena
View
40
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Update on Wintertime Snowfall Augmentation in the Western U. S. NWRA Annual Meeting Emerging Water Augmentation Strategies 7 March 2012. Arlen Huggins Associate Research Scientist Division of Atmospheric Sciences Desert Research Institute Reno, Nevada. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
Update on Wintertime Snowfall Augmentationin the Western U. S.
NWRA Annual MeetingEmerging Water Augmentation
Strategies7 March 2012
Arlen HugginsAssociate Research ScientistDivision of Atmospheric SciencesDesert Research InstituteReno, Nevada
Winter Cloud Seeding for Snow/Water Augmentation
• Conceptual model for winter cloud seeding• Current research activities– Randomized experiments– Physical studies– Hydrologic modeling
• Operational projects in the western U.S.• Upper Colorado River Basin Projects– Colorado, Utah, and Wyoming– Upper and Lower Basin interaction
• Summary of snow augmentation status
Ground-based seeding with silver iodide
-10C
-5C
Conceptual Diagram of Orographic Cloud Seeding
Recent Research• Australian Snowy Mountain Project– Funded by Australian government and conducted
by Snowy Hydro– 5-year study with randomized seeding of a single
target– Published results showed a statistically significant
14% increase in target precipitation for “seeded” events
• U. of Wyoming airborne radar study– Radar signal increase noted during seeding
periods– Radar signal increase corresponds to a significant
precipitation rate increase
Recent Research• WY Weather Modification Pilot Project
– Dual-target experiment: one target randomly seeded when cloud conditions are similar over both targets – 4-hour experimental units (EUs)
– 121 EUs to date; requesting funding for an additional two years – funded by state of WY
– Statistical evaluation of paired seed vs. no-seed precipitation values – 200+ EUs desired
– Targeting and environmental assessment using trace chemistry techniques
– Unique use of atmospheric modeling for forecasting and evaluation of seeding events
– Hydrologic modeling to assess impact of seeding on streamflow in the North Platte RB
• U. of WY airborne radar study being repeated– NSF funding (~$1M budget) with more ground based
instrumentation– Attempting to verify earlier findings
UW Cloud Radar • 3 mm (95 GHz, W-band), dual-polarization• pulse width: 250-500 ns• max range: 3-10 km• volume resolution @ 3 km range: < 40 m• minimum detectable signal (@ 1 km): ~-30 dBZ• Cloud droplets are much smaller than ice crystals, thus
in a mixed-phase cloud, reflectivity is dominated by ice crystals.
UW Cloud Lidar • non-coherent eyesafe backscatter lidar• up & down (down only for 4 out of 7 flights)• backscatter power & depolarization ratio• attenuated by cloud layers• lidar & radar can be combined to estimate cloud
properties
WWMPP model output of seeding plume trajectories, winds and cloud water content
Plume of ice crystals
Weather stationcontrols dispenser
Seeding materials & delivery methods
Research on Wintertime Cloud Seeding in Mountainous Terrain
Has verified all the links in the chain of the cloud seeding conceptual model
Has verified ice crystal and precipitation enhancement through physical observations
Has shown evidence of precipitation enhancement through statistical evaluations
Has revealed situations when cloud seeding is ineffective Does not have all the answers to every meteorological
situation where cloud seeding is applied
Operational Cloud Seeding Projects
Nevada Cloud Seeding Projects Tahoe funded by TMWA and
WRWC Walker Basin funded by BOR
(Desert Terminal Lakes Project) NE Nevada funded by SNWA
Utah Projects
Cost share between state and local water groups
Cost ~ $370K
Est. snow water increase> 150 AF
Colorado Projects in WY2011 – Local Funding plus CWCB/LCRB grants
Areas with snowfall augmentation
potential in the UCRB
1967-1968 Runoff Augmentation Estimates
10% increase1.3 – 1.9 MAF
Hunter (USBR, 2005)2-year SNODAS w/+10%
0.6 – 1.1 MAF
Griffith/Solak (NAWC, 2006)NWS Runoff Model
5-15% increase0.6 – 1.6 MAF
Collaboration between Upper and Lower CRB States in Snow Augmentation Projects
Cooperative agreement between (CO, UT and WY) and (AZ, CA and NV) – in place since 2006
LCRB funding to: Extend operations in existing projects in UT & CO Add new equipment (seeding and observing) in UT & CO Add additional research equipment (WY) Apply modeling, physical evaluations, etc. to ongoing
projects
Summary of Water Augmentation by Wintertime Cloud Seeding
A reasonably healthy research component Steady number of operational projects
Funded mainly by state, regional and local water agencies + power companies
Augmentation strategy used for over 50 years Project evaluations indicate benefits justify costs Operations being enhanced by interstate/basin
cooperative agreements Instrumentation and modeling advances have improved
operational efficiency – room for further improvement Hydrologic modeling used more to assess water augmentation
aspect and its economic, political and environmental benefits