Upload
ralph-terry
View
217
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
UNTOUCHABLE CARROTS: MARKETING SCHOOL CHOICE AND REALITIES IN HARTFORD'S INTER-DISTRICT MAGNET PROGRAM
Mira Debs, Yale University
Trinity College, April 7, 2015
Accomplishments of Sheff
As of 2014, 44.5% of Hartford students now attend racially integrated schools.
17,000 Hartford and suburban students enrolled at 48 inter-district magnet schools
31 suburban districts accept 2,000 Hartford students as part of the Open choice program (Sheff Movement Coalition, 2014)
Hartford Public Schools children entering Kindergarten with preK experience – 34.2% in 2007, now 68% in 2013 (Debs, 2015).
Research Question
Why are many families/stakeholders in Hartford dissatisfied with the post-2008 school choice system?RSCO lottery
Hartford (HPS) choice lottery
- magnet & Open Choice schools- optional
- non-magnet schools & charter schools- required at transitional grades- no guaranteed neighborhood school
Methodology
18 month multi-site qualitative study including Observations of parent events at 2 public
magnet schools in Hartford Observations at magnet fairs, Open Houses,
community forums, Sheff meetings Formal and informal interviews with 64
parents & Hartford and state educators 400+ hours of observation in Hartford
Theoretical Background
Controlled choice as the more equitable alternative to market based choice (Orfield & Frankenberg, 2012; Wells, Baldridge, et al., 2009)
Hartford has a strong controlled choice system. So why are parents dissatisfied?
Findings: Marketing DisconnectMarketing of choice FREEDOM, PERSONAL FIT
vs. reality for Hartford families
a White Hartford mother with biracial children, explained to me how she chose a school for her son, “I really liked [the arts school]. I actually thought [my son] had more of a performing arts bent. Not in my zone. Not in my neighborhood...So, you can have a sciency child in zone 3 or you can have an artsy child in zone 4.”
Findings: Transportation problems 34% of Hartford families don’t own cars
(U.S. Census Bureau, 2014) Very few magnets offer transportation
for PreK students.
PreK3 PreK4 K0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
Hartford PreK&K seats per applications 2013-2014
CRECHPSOpen Choice
These families are least able to enroll in magnet schools at the moment that they have the best chance of admission (Debs, 2015)
Parent Reactions to Racial Balancing
Illegal to select students on the basis of race. But Sheff schools must attract 25% White & Asian students.
So – open seats, targeted recruitment efforts
Black magnet recruiter “Of course they’re all white. They’re supposed to be recruiting white families, and they have a better chance of convincing them to come that way.”
Implications
“J-curve of increased expectations” (Davies 1966).
Hartford parents have increased ACCESS. Now Feeling of inequality (recruitment focus,
double lottery, zones, transportation) New boundary lines – magnets and non-
magnets, lottery winners, lottery losers Fiercest critics: Hartford middle class families
– even as they benefit the most ability to attract and retain middle class families
Concluding questions
How might we change the Sheff agreement mechanisms so that parents experience equal treatment in the choice process?
How do we respond to Hartford parents’ desire/transportation needs for quality schools in their neighborhood?
How do we make all choices good choices?
Works cited:
Davies, J. C. (1969). The J-curve of rising and declining satisfactions as a cause of some great revolutions and a contained rebellion. Violence in America, 690-730.
Debs, M. (2015). Pre-Kindergarten Availability and Access in Hartford Region Magnet and Open Choice Schools. from http://www.sheffmovement.org/publications/pre-k-programs/
Eaton, S. (2008). The children in Room E4: American education on trial: Algonquin Books.
Orfield, G., & Frankenberg, E. (2012). Educational delusions?: Why choice can deepen inequality and how to make schools fair. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Wells, A. S., Baldridge, B. J., Duran, J., Grzesikowski, C., Lofton, R., Roda, A., . . . White, T. (2009). Boundary Crossing for Diversity, Equity and Achievement. Cambridge, MA: Charles Hamilton Houston Institute for Race and Justice, Harvard Law School.