4
Turning risk into results Unlocking the power of GRC technology

Unlocking the power of GRC technology - EY - United · PDF fileGRC technology enables four key objectives of the risk agenda Significant workflow automation Centralized risk and risk

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Unlocking the power of GRC technology - EY - United · PDF fileGRC technology enables four key objectives of the risk agenda Significant workflow automation Centralized risk and risk

Turning risk into resultsUnlocking the power of GRC technology

Page 2: Unlocking the power of GRC technology - EY - United · PDF fileGRC technology enables four key objectives of the risk agenda Significant workflow automation Centralized risk and risk

What we are seeing in the marketOrganizations today are struggling with managing risks across the enterprise. External and internal risk management requirements are becoming increasingly complex and intrusive, while the demand for more comprehensive, consolidated and actionable governance, risk and compliance (GRC) information continues to increase. The historic approach of managing risk in silos across different teams, processes, methods and infrastructure cannot keep up with these requirements. Risk management has become a growing operational and financial burden, limiting its ability to keep pace with business growth and transformational initiatives.

This is the right time to learn about opportunities to transform your risk management program by enabling GRC technology that can:

• Create improved visibility and integration by linking various risk and control frameworks• Lower the cost of risk management through the elimination of duplicate and fragmented risk

activities and reduction of manual processes• Increase efficiencies through automation and end-to-end process centralization

What are the opportunities at your company?Typical current state Mature state

Our recent EY global survey of more than 250 leading organizations found a direct link between effective risk management practices and improved financial performance. Harnessing the power of GRC technology to improve risk information, streamline processes and reduce cost was both the biggest challenge and opportunity in achieving the needed risk management maturity.

Increasing complexity Simplified

Reactive Proactive

Failure and fear of unknown

Visibility

Cost pressures

Cost- efficient

Inconsistent approach Consistent

Multiple and manual risk and access management processes

Significant workflow automationCentralized risk and risk assessment managementTop-down and bottom-up risk integration

Fragmented, manual and ad hoc reportingInability to produce a consolidated heat map

Consistent and real-time reportingCentralized and consolidated heat mapDrill-down capabilities

High instances of segregation of duties violationsLack of confidence that all risks were captured

Compliant role design and user provisioning activitiesConsolidated views and end-to-end risk management processes

Lack of centralizationSignificant impact on business

Centralized processesReasonable impact on businessAbility to manage risks at multiple organizational levels

Inconsistent approach to capture and assess risks across the organization

Central end-to-end processAutomated risk activities linked to controls and outcomes

Page 3: Unlocking the power of GRC technology - EY - United · PDF fileGRC technology enables four key objectives of the risk agenda Significant workflow automation Centralized risk and risk

GRC technology enables four key objectives of the risk agenda

Significant workflow automationCentralized risk and risk assessment managementTop-down and bottom-up risk integration

Resulting in the following benefits:

• Improved alignment to the objectives and strategy of the business

• Central management of financial, operational and compliance risks and controls across organization

• Increased integration and coordination among business, IT and compliance

• Improved control mix that addresses key business risks while driving process efficiencies

• Sustainability of risk management process

• Effective top-down and bottom-up reporting

• Elimination of duplicate and fragmented risk management activities

• Reduced level of effort associated with performing and testing controls

• Reduction in compliance and audit costs, including those associated with audit failure

• Increased control and process efficiencies enabled through automation and continuous monitoring

• Improved return on investment due to reliance on application controls rather than manual controls

• Comprehensive and continuous risk management and monitoring

• Proactive identification of risks

• Improved visibility and integration across manual and fragmented risk activities

• Better aligned risk coverage, including the identification of stronger, more pervasive controls

• Improved visibility to risks that matter most to the organization, enabling resources to focus proactively on the most significant risks

Improve controls and processes

Better aligned risk coverage,including the identification of stronger, more pervasive controls

Reduced level of effort associated with performing and testing controls

Increased control and process efficiencies enabled through automation and continuous monitoring

Improved control mix that addresses key business risks while driving process efficiencies

Embed risk management Comprehensive and continuous

risk management and monitoring

Central management of financial, operational and compliance risks and controls across organization

Enhance risk strategy

Improved alignment to the objectives and strategy of the business

Improved visibility to risks that matter most to the organization

Proactive identification of risks

Enhanced decision-making

Optimize risk managementfunctions

Elimination of duplicate and fragmented risk management activities

Increased integration and coordination among business, IT and compliance

Sustainability of risk management process

Effective top-down and bottom-up reporting

Turning risk into results

Enhance risk

strategy

Embed risk

management

Optimize risk management

functions

Improve controls and

processes

Risk agenda

Risk

Cost

Value Risk Value

Cost Cost

ValueRisk

Page 4: Unlocking the power of GRC technology - EY - United · PDF fileGRC technology enables four key objectives of the risk agenda Significant workflow automation Centralized risk and risk

Next steps to improve your risk management landscape

Maturity models: industry-specific maturity models to assist with mapping the current state to leading practices (enterprise-wide technology, GRC technology and processes/controls).

Leading-practice benchmarks: access to leading practices and industry-specific benchmarks to help assess the current state and identify improvement opportunities.

RiCAP™: collects and analyzes process, risk and controls data to help align risk spend to strategic and business objectives by maximizing risk coverage and identifying control cost drivers.

GRC tool evaluation: a detailed evaluation of 14 leading GRC vendors.

GRC tool Functionality

Tool 1

Tool 2

Tool 3

Tool 4

Tool 5

Tool 6

Tool 7

Tool 8

Tool 9

Tool 10

Tool 11

Tool 12

Tool 13

Tool 14

Reporting capabilities

► General reporting – How maturity is the reporting engine, and how effective is the tool at reporting in a variety of formats such as tables, spreadsheets, summary, column, row and hierarchical tree formats?

► Statistical reporting – How effective is the tool at statistical reporting including support for bubble, bar, column, line, and pie charts as well as heat maps? How effective is the tool at plotting multiple parameters (greater than three) on any one report?

► Dashboard presentation – How effectively can reports be dynamically displayed into dashboards and updated in real time. Can the information presented in a dashboard be “drilled into” to bring up the underlying data to support the dashboard.

► Content access control – How effective is the tool at dynamically enforcing content restriction based on roles (RBAC) and dynamically calculated permissions?

► Report display and print – How good is the on-screen and print quality of reports? How effective are the report customization options for both visual and data manipulation?

► Report export – How effective are the report exporting capabilities? ► Scheduling – How effective is the report scheduling feature whereby

batches of reports can be executed? ► Integration – Can the tool directly integrate with crystal or business

objects “out of the box”.

Leading trend: the ability to provide real time reporting in multiple formats including heat maps and the ability to chart

“N” number of attributes within any report

GRC technology spend, effectiveness and efficiency assessment KPIs

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

Close process cycle time Days sales outstanding Audit / compliance testing cycle time

Risk assessment cycle time

Reporting cycle time

Industry peer

Company X

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

Automated primary controls

Manual testing of controls

IT portfolio spend (% of revenue)

Business intelligence spend (% of revenue)

Risk technology spend (% of revenue)

Industry peer

Company X

GRC tool functional coverage

Governance Financial risk Risk management Metrics, presentation and reporting

► Policy management ► Standards ► Procedures ► PRC framework ► Asset and hierarchy

management ► Process accountability ► Data management ► Awareness training ► Project management

► Scenario analysis ► Risk modeling ► Financial risk impact

analysis

► Risk profiling ► Risk assessment ► Risk identification ► Risk analysis ► KRIs ► Threat and vulnerability

management ► Information security ► BCP/DR ► Internal control

management ► KRI/KPI management ► Vendor management ► Service delivery

management

► Dashboards ► Ad-hoc reporting ► Notifications ► User interface ► Statistical analysis ► Historical trending ► Triggered calculations ► Audit tracking ► Data export

Compliance Audit Issues management Incident management

► Regulatory content Management

► Leading practice content Management

► Compliance monitoring ► Compliance assessment

► Program management ► Scheduling ► Attestation ► Evidence capture ► SAS 70/SOC 2

► Risk treatment ► Risk acceptance ► Policy exceptions ► Risk transference

► Event capture ► Loss capture

Rapid GRC technology diagnostic provides accelerated current state assessment of your GRC processes and technology, allowing you to identify realizable value and develop a future state road map to achieve it.

Why EY?

• Global and flexible approach with a focus on SAP GRC, Oracle GRC and RSA Archer eGRC solutions

• Knowledgeable team with practical experience in process, risk and technology disciplines

• Industry-specific content and enablers

• Leading-practice assessment diagnostics and leverage models

• Service delivery model design and key performance indicators

Our services• Rapid GRC technology diagnostic

• GRC technology vendor selection

• GRC technology implementation and assessments

• Risk transformation enabled by GRC technology

Baseline enterprise-wide GRC technology maturity model

Optimize enterprise application landscape

► Single ERP vendor as primary choice for global corporate functions

► Aggressively rationalize application portfolio and licensing

► Centrally developed architectural blueprints and standards adopted

Simplify enterprise application landscape

► Rationalize application portfolio and licensing alignment

► Single ERP vendor by function ► Architectural standards and blueprints

alignment

Leverage enterprise application landscape

► Some application rationalization ► Leverage unused ERP functionality and

integration ► Limited adoption of architectural standards

Deployment options

► Application rationalization/ Decommissioning

► Point solutions and custom applications ► Inconsistent architectural landscape

Maximize IT organizational efficiency

Status quo

Maximize cost reduction

Maximize organizational effectiveness Deploy technology

Leverage technology

Simplify technology

Optimize technology

Tech

nolo

gy e

nabl

emen

t

Benefits

Simplify

Deploy

Leverage

Optimize

Where is Co? X

What is your future state?

GRC technology benchmarking metrics

Top

66% 9% 20%

Metrics Low Median

Percentage (%) of primary controls that are automated.

46% 17% 30% Percentage (%) of IT budget related to providing IT support services.

30 Days 74 Days 55 Days Average cycle time in days (including weekends) from identification of a change in risk till risk response.

2 Days 14 Days 5 Days Average cycle time in days (including weekends) from the identification of a control violation until its reported.

0.2 3.8 1.1 Technology cost associated with reporting on internal controls and compliance per $100,000 revenue.

‘Co X’ current state

Note: Cross-industry technology, internal controls, and process benchmarks obtained from APQC.

Automation

Portfolio rationalization

Automation

Automation

Portfolio simplification

EY | Assurance | Tax | Transactions | Advisory

About EY EY is a global leader in assurance, tax, transaction and advisory services. The insights and quality services we deliver help build trust and confidence in the capital markets and in economies the world over. We develop outstanding leaders who team to deliver on our promises to all of our stakeholders. In so doing, we play a critical role in building a better working world for our people, for our clients and for our communities.

EY refers to the global organization, and may refer to one or more, of the member firms of Ernst & Young Global Limited, each of which is a separate legal entity. Ernst & Young Global Limited, a UK company limited by guarantee, does not provide services to clients. For more information about our organization, please visit ey.com.

© 2014 EYGM Limited. All Rights Reserved.

EYG/OC/FEA no. XX0000

1403-1222661 EC

ED 0115

This material has been prepared for general informational purposes only and is not intended to be relied upon as accounting, tax, or other professional advice. Please refer to your advisors for specific advice.

ey.com