83
Portland Aquatic Community Center Stefanie Hanna-Riggs University of Oregon Portland Program School of Architecture and Allied Arts 2011-2012 Urban Waterfront Thesis Professor Gerry Gast

University of Oregon Master's Thesis Monograph

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

The monograph was created from the work done during 2011-2012 in the University of Oregon Master's program. The Portland Aquatic Community Center (PACC) is a large-scale aquatic community and recreation center for people across Portland that has a unique user base because it provides a unique amenity: access to the Willamette. This project connects people to the waterfront creating a tactile experience for both residents and tourists by drawing people from downtown and creating a loop of activity with Tom McCall Waterfront Park.

Citation preview

Page 1: University of Oregon Master's Thesis Monograph

Portland Aquatic Community Center Stefanie Hanna-Riggs

University of Oregon Portland Program School of Architecture and Allied Arts2011-2012 Urban Waterfront ThesisProfessor Gerry Gast

Page 2: University of Oregon Master's Thesis Monograph

[email protected]

Key FactsFunction: Aquatic Community Center

Location: 1700 SE Water Ave, Portland, OR 97214. This project, located north of OMSI, explores the scenario of the I-5 freeway being removed as a long-term plan. The site can be developed now and expanded upon with the removal of the freeway.

Condensed Thesis Statement: The Portland Aquatic Community Center (PACC) is a large-scale aquatic community and recreation center for people across Portland that has a unique user base because it provides a unique amenity: access to the Willamette. This project connects people to the waterfront creating a tactile experience for both residents and tourists by drawing people from downtown and creating a loop of activity with Tom McCall Waterfront Park.

Portland Aquatic Community Center Stefanie Hanna-Riggs

Page 3: University of Oregon Master's Thesis Monograph

Table of Contents

University of Oregon Portland Program School of Architecture and Allied Arts2011-2012 Urban Waterfront ThesisProfessor Gerry Gast

Key Facts 2Thesis Statement 4Client 5Portland, Oregon 6Site 8Urban Design 11Building Concept 14Building Program 15Floor Plans 18Materials and Enclosure 20Climate Response and Sustainable Strategies 21

Appendix A: Programming Document from Fall 2011 31Appendix B: East Bank Master Plan 61

Page 4: University of Oregon Master's Thesis Monograph

Stefanie Hanna-Riggs | Monograph | 06.14.124

Thesis StatementProject ObjectivesThe Portland Aquatic Community Center (PACC) is a large-scale aquatic community and recreation center for the city of Portland This project provides similar amenities as most community centers but to a larger group of people, focusing on the city as a whole rather than a single neighborhood.

The Center provides a unique amenity to downtown Portland, providing services that Portland is currently lacking. This project will be a catalyst for the east side and will attract more development, especially given the nature of the project being a large public function. The Center will help the East Portland Waterfront transition from its industrial past to its diversified future centered on people and activity, drawing people from across Portland to connect with the river and community.

Statement of ProjectThe Portland Aquatic Community Center integrates water activities and community functions in a large, citywide scale community center. It combines aspects of healthy living (exercise and relaxation) through interaction with nature, water and community. These manifest themselves in physical water-related activities and relaxing spa amenities. This project integrates with the existing outdoor space along the waterfront and creates a counterpart to Tom McCall Waterfront Park across the river. This project will has a mixture of water recreation and land activities, tying together the bank and the river.

Page 5: University of Oregon Master's Thesis Monograph

5Urban Waterfronts Thesis 2011-2012

This project will be developed as a public amenity for the City of Portland Parks and Recreation Department. Classes, equipment rental, and space rental generates revenue.

Client

Project Objectives:• Connect people to the water• Create a loop of movement with downtown:

interact with Tom McCall Waterfront Park• Provide a unique amenity to Portland• Be a catalyst as a large public function• Create a public project for tourists and residents

alike

PACC attracts people from across Portland to connect with the river and the community.

Page 6: University of Oregon Master's Thesis Monograph

Stefanie Hanna-Riggs | Monograph | 06.14.126

Portland, Oregon

The city of Portland, Oregon, located at the confluence of the Willamette and Colombia Rivers, was settled for its advantageous shipping position. When the city was laid out in 1845, it was never planned to include land on both sides of the Willamette, but rather just the west bank.

The City of East Portland

In 1868, mainline railroad tracks were constructed on the east bank, an area which was mainly comprised of farmers at the time. Immediately following the railroad, the east bank became the incorporated city of East Portland in 1870. The population of 1500 people was connected to the west bank by two ferries that continuously crossed the river.

In 1887, Portland first bridge, the Morrison Bridge, was opened, allowing trolleys to connect neighborhoods on both sides of the river. In 1891, East Portland and Portland merged into one city with about 25% of the population living on the east side.

For the complete urban design, refer to Appendix B “East Bank Master Plan.”

Page 7: University of Oregon Master's Thesis Monograph

7Urban Waterfronts Thesis 2011-2012

One city with two distinct characters

Even following the merger, the two sides of the river maintained their distinct characters, a fact that persists today. Overall, the city of Portland has over 90 different neighborhoods, with a large housing stock and many industrial jobs being found on the east side.

Along the East Bank of the Willamette Marshes, docks, sandbars, bluffs and wharves have come and gone with time. Land has been created by filling or excavating. Many buildings, factories, and embankments have been constructed, used, and then demolished to make way for the next layer of development.

The 1950s and the Car

In the 1950s, many American cities began to turn away from their ports and focus on vehicular transportation. Portland was not immune to this movement, and in the 1960’s, abandoned docks and wharves were replaced by the I-5 freeway along the east bank. At the time, the land was considered “left over” with little monetary value. The freeway radically shifted the east bank’s land form, providing minimal waterfront access and depriving the city of half of its waterfront property.

Page 8: University of Oregon Master's Thesis Monograph

Stefanie Hanna-Riggs | Monograph | 06.14.128

Site Selection: East Portland and the I-5

The project, located north of OMSI, explores the scenario of the I-5 freeway being removed as a long-term plan. The site can be developed now and expanded upon with the removal of the freeway.

There have been incremental steps made in the past three decades to make the east bank a more usable place. Between OMSI, the East Bank Esplanade, and now the new transit and pedestrian bridge, the character of the east waterfront is becoming public and active. This character will be strengthened in the new waterfront plan, the next step of which will be a the Portland Aquatic Community Center north of OMSI.

The site was selected for its pivotal point as the only river-accessible land with the current freeway situation, allowing the project to be built as a first step in the process of getting the freeway removed. The center will interact with the existing East Bank Esplanade, creating a loop with the downtown area via the new pedestrian bridge south of the site.

Site

Page 9: University of Oregon Master's Thesis Monograph

9Urban Waterfronts Thesis 2011-2012

Proposed Site Concept:

This project mends the disjointed urban fabric by providing an anchor point along the waterfront, connecting people to the water. PACC creates a tactile experience by drawing people from downtown and creating a loop of activity with Tom McCall Waterfront Park. This civic space is a place for people to come together to engage with the water for recreational, social, and educational uses, serving as a center for the community.

Building Concept: The concept of the convergence of land and water carries through to the building. The curtain walls allow people to visually connect to the river and land, while the openings in the roof allow ample natural light. The pools are arranged in a linear fashion, allowing a visual connection between the spaces.

Service Entry

SE Water Avenue

New Proposed Parking Structure

Parking

OMSI

Group MacKenzie

Alder Street Kayak& Canoe

Portland CommunityCollege

New Milwaukie Light Rail Bridge

Lightrail Line

Streetcar Line

Railroad Tracks

Site Existing OMSI Warehouse(Removed)

Power Station

South Waterfront View Corridor

Downtown View Corridor

Existing Esplanade

Existing Parking/Empty Lot

Lightrail Station

Page 10: University of Oregon Master's Thesis Monograph

Stefanie Hanna-Riggs | Monograph | 06.14.1210

Hawthorne Bridgehead

OMSI

Hawthorne Bridgehead

OMSI

This project holds down this point along the paths, stitching together the land, the Esplanade, and the water into a cohesive element.

This building is part of a loop of movement along the waterfront. Each important site, including OMSI, the Rose Garden, and the marina is an anchor point that is creating a tension moving people from one node to the next.

OMSI

Page 11: University of Oregon Master's Thesis Monograph

11Urban Waterfronts Thesis 2011-2012

SE Madison Street

Service Entry SE Mill Street

SE Market Street

SE Clay Street

Service Entry

Seating Structures

OMSI/PACC Shared Social Space

Open Grass Field

Play Structure

Fish Pond

Boat Launch

Water Taxi Launch

Barge Pool

Seating Structures

Vegetated, Non-Accessible Rehabilitated Shoreline

OMSI

SE Water Avenue

SE Stephens Street

SE Water Avenue

New Proposed Parking Structure

Parking

DN

DN

DN

DN

DN

Living Room

Display Area

Security

Change Room

Baths

Change Room

Children’s Area

Basketball Court

Basketball Court

Seating

Seating

Leisure Pool

Outdoor Swim

Loading/Services

Hot Tub

Reception

Cafe

Kid’s Pool

Olympic Sized Lap Pool

Physical Therapy/Training

Therapy Pools

Storage

DN

UP

DN UP

DN

UP

UP

UP

DN

DN

DN

DN

DN

DN

Vegetated, Non-AccessibleRehabilitated Shoreline

Misc. Sports Fields

School Bus Parking/Loading

(Shared with OMSI)

A

The urban design plan focuses on civic spaces along the waterfront. This plan maintains, improves, and expands the esplanade to create ample room for foot and bike traffic along the waterfront.

This plan is centered on people, movement towards the river, and public spaces.

The freeway causes a scar on the site, and will be remembered by the new park and habitat restoration area, even when it is removed in the future.

Urban Design

Page 12: University of Oregon Master's Thesis Monograph

Stefanie Hanna-Riggs | Monograph | 06.14.1212

Typical Waterfront Situation in Portland

Proposed: Uniting Land and Water

WaterPublic Access

Civic Building Park

The typical waterfront treatment in downtown Portland is a hard, impermeable edge between water and land. This cuts off access to the river.

Portland Aquatic Community Center breaks down this hard edge and allows access to the river.

Page 13: University of Oregon Master's Thesis Monograph

13Urban Waterfronts Thesis 2011-2012

Water

Water

Hard Water’s Edge

Public Access

Public Access

Public Access

Public Access

Park

Park

Street

Street

Building

Building

Public Access

Page 14: University of Oregon Master's Thesis Monograph

Stefanie Hanna-Riggs | Monograph | 06.14.1214

The building is sited where land meets water on an artificially filled site that was once part of the river.

The building meets the water and arcs over the esplanade, integrating with the public activity of the city. The building and the site create points of access to the Willamette.

A large-scale rainwater collection and filtration pool cuts between the building and the park. The seam between land and water is blurred, creating a continuous experience.

Building Concept

Page 15: University of Oregon Master's Thesis Monograph

15Urban Waterfronts Thesis 2011-2012

Building ProgramThe programmatic elements include water sports rental and storage, a public pool integrated with the river, water taxis and ferries, fishing, physical water activities, and spa amenities. The other programs include sports facilities, workout rooms, community multi-purpose rooms for classes and meetings, a kitchen, and support spaces.

Project Uses/Users

Some uses include different teams using the facility, adult and student classes, student groups or schools, after-school or summer programs, and water tours of Portland. This project will give everyone a chance to experience these activities, whether it is through rental, teams, schools, or organizations.

Education Space: Uses: Children, Youth, Adult, Senior, and Family classes. Examples: computers, sewing, language, home improvement, crafts. These classes would be community determined by the type of classes people request and want to teach.

A teenager could get a job teaching basic computer skills to a senior class, a retired adult could teach sewing to children, a fluent Spanish speaker could teach a Spanish class.

The classroom spaces would also be used for recreational team meetings, or teaching people about the sport before going on the water. Classes also happen in the pool.

Community Center = Education + Social + Recreation

Page 16: University of Oregon Master's Thesis Monograph

Stefanie Hanna-Riggs | Monograph | 06.14.1216

SOCIAL SUPPORTRECREATIONALEDUCATIONALEDUCATIONALEDUCATIONAL

Event Space

Lobby/Display Living RoomLockers

Public Restroom

Youth SpaceViewing Level

Private RestroomStorageO�cesBreakroom

LockersTherapy/Fitness CenterTherapy Pools Spas Children’s Area

Storage & Mechanical Systems

Indoor Basketball & Seating Outdoor Basketball & Seating

Long Section Diagram

Living Room Children’s Area

Locker Rooms

Restroom, Storage, Mech/Electrical Equipment

Large Events Room

Computer Center

Small Meeting Rooms Fitness Center

Midsize Meeting Rooms Sauna

Large Meeting Rooms Hot Tub

Center Administration

Teen Center

Cafe

SOCIAL SUPPORTIndoor Outdoor

RECREATIONAL

Lifeguard Area Children’s Play Area

Basketball Court

DockRecreational Pool

Water Taxis

Storage

Lap Pool

EDUCATIONAL

Page 17: University of Oregon Master's Thesis Monograph

17Urban Waterfronts Thesis 2011-2012View South through Lap Pool

Page 18: University of Oregon Master's Thesis Monograph

Stefanie Hanna-Riggs | Monograph | 06.14.1218

SE Madison Street

Service Entry SE Mill Street

SE Market Street

SE Clay Street

Service Entry

Seating Structures

OMSI/PACC Shared Social Space

Open Grass Field

Play Structure

Fish Pond

Boat Launch

Water Taxi Launch

Barge Pool

Seating Structures

Vegetated, Non-Accessible Rehabilitated Shoreline

OMSI

SE Water Avenue

SE Stephens Street

SE Water Avenue

New Proposed Parking Structure

Parking

DN

DN

DN

DN

DN

Living Room

Display Area

Security

Change Room

Baths

Change Room

Children’s Area

Basketball Court

Basketball Court

Seating

Seating

Leisure Pool

Outdoor Swim

Loading/Services

Hot Tub

Reception

Cafe

Kid’s Pool

Olympic Sized Lap Pool

Physical Therapy/Training

Therapy Pools

Storage

DN

UP

DN UP

DN

UP

UP

UP

DN

DN

DN

DN

DN

DN

Vegetated, Non-AccessibleRehabilitated Shoreline

Misc. Sports Fields

School Bus Parking/Loading

(Shared with OMSI)

A

Alder Street Kayak and Canoe

Group Mackenzie Building

Portland Community College

Basement Plan

UP

UP

Air Handler

Storage & Mech

Air Handler

Air HandlerB

B

C

C

Floor Plans

Page 19: University of Oregon Master's Thesis Monograph

19Urban Waterfronts Thesis 2011-2012

Second Floor Plan Third Floor Plan

Conference Room

Administration O�ces

Open to Below

O�ce

O�ce

Break Room

Storage

Class Room

Event Room

Open to Below Open to Below

Open to Below

Open to Below

Open to Below

DN

UP

DN

DN

UP

DN UP

DN

A

DN

Look Out Point

Page 20: University of Oregon Master's Thesis Monograph

Section: ECS & Tectonic Diagram

Rainwater Collection and Natural Filtration

Materials and Enclosure

The light building enclosure allows a connection to the natural site in every direction. To the east and west, the curtain walls with thin mullions provide unobstructed views to the river and park. The perforated roof allows abundant natural light as well as a visual connection to the sky.

The roof is copper plated with 3 foot by 8 foot openings that allow natural light to penetrate the building throughout the day. The openings are protected by sunshades, the shape of each being determined by the angle of the passing sun. The exterior walls are a curtain wall system with thin mullions. The 3’ x 8’ grid established by the roof panels is continued down through the curtain walls, creating visual continuity between the two systems.

Environmental Control Systems

Since the roof is sculptural and exposed in all directions, all of the mechanical systems are located in the basement. The air intake is on the east side of the building. In the large pool spaces, the air is brought up through the floor. Radiant heating in the pool deck is used to maximize the efficiency in the tall spaces. Automated opening panels at low and high points on the exterior facades allow for natural ventilation.

Page 21: University of Oregon Master's Thesis Monograph

Natural Lighting maximized by angle of Sunshades

Vegetated Sea WallLight Permeating Esplanade

Piles

34’ Ground Floor Level30’ 100 Year Flood Line

3’ Average Low Water Level

18’ Average High Water Level23’10 Year Flood Line

Program Precedent: Sutro Baths in San Francisco. Large Scale aquatic center on the waterfront

Badeshiff, Berlin Germany

Climate Response and Sustainable StrategiesThe perforated roof and light curtain walls allow for ample natural light, which is supplemented by artificial lighting on the trusses. All rainwater off the building, site, and surrounding areas is collected to be retained and filtered in the natural pool. The deep overhangs of the roof provide shading for the glass elevations, as well as environmental protection for people on the esplanade.

Page 22: University of Oregon Master's Thesis Monograph

Stefanie Hanna-Riggs | Monograph | 06.14.1222

Tectonic Wall SectionScale: 1/4”=1’-0”

Concrete Planted Sea WallConcrete FootingPiles: 25’ deep-90’ deep

Pool Drain

Radient HeatingAir Duct

Copper PanelsSteelSteel DeckingSteelI-Beam Support with Batt InsulationAcoustical/Light Reflecting PanelSteel TrussLights

West Elevation

Tectonic Detail

Page 23: University of Oregon Master's Thesis Monograph

23Urban Waterfronts Thesis 2011-2012 Looking west from 2nd floor over leisure pools

Page 24: University of Oregon Master's Thesis Monograph

Midterm Model Photos

Page 25: University of Oregon Master's Thesis Monograph

View North from Willamette

Page 26: University of Oregon Master's Thesis Monograph

Stefanie Hanna-Riggs | Monograph | 06.14.1226

Influential Theories and Precedents The area that was most strongly influenced by precedents is the roof. Various types of perforated skins and large spans were studied.

Many museums have perforated roofs due to the need for non-direct natural light. The Nasher Sculpture Center and the addition to the High Museum, both by Renzo Piano, influenced the design of the roof in this project.

The Kansai International Airport Terminal in Osaka Japan by Renzo Piano provided guidelines for large spans and metal skins.

Kansai International Airport Terminal in Osaka, Japan, Renzo Piano.

Nasher Sculpture Center, Renzo Piano.

Page 27: University of Oregon Master's Thesis Monograph

27Urban Waterfronts Thesis 2011-2012

View South from 3rd Floor

Page 28: University of Oregon Master's Thesis Monograph

Stefanie Hanna-Riggs | Monograph | 06.14.1228

Page 29: University of Oregon Master's Thesis Monograph

29Urban Waterfronts Thesis 2011-2012

The Building

Spatial OrganizationThe building sits on a site equivalent in length to two Portland city blocks. The visual continuation of the three streets that run into the project became a driving spatial organizer for the project. As these 60 foot wide axes (red) change from streets to walkways, they become points of access to the water, defining the building into two sections.

In the north/south direction, the central interior corridor (yellow) provides access to the pools on the west and the support/secondary spaces on the east. These interior axes are distinguished by unobstructed skylights above.

StructureThe main structural elements of PACC are large steel trusses that span the width of the space. Steel is used due to its efficiency in spanning the large distances over the pools. The 25’ bays created by the distribution of the bold blue trusses provide a rhythm to the long, linear spaces.

Page 30: University of Oregon Master's Thesis Monograph

Stefanie Hanna-Riggs | Monograph | 06.14.1230

Page 31: University of Oregon Master's Thesis Monograph

31Urban Waterfronts Thesis 2011-2012

Appendix A: Programming Document from Fall 2011Note: some programming elements have been modified since this original programming document

Crescent Island: Eastbank Riverfront Park Master Plan, 1994 32Crescent Park: East Bank 2040 Master Plan, 1998 33Total Size of Building 34Building Program Diagram 38Site Program Diagram 40Adjacencies 41Precedents 42Chelsea Piers 43Crissy Field 44Copenhagen Harbour Bath 46Wembley National Stadium 48Lake Oswego Community Center (proposed) 50Portland Community Centers 52Southwest Community Center 54Mittleman Jewish Community Center 56Site Visits and Interviews 58

Page 32: University of Oregon Master's Thesis Monograph

Stefanie Hanna-Riggs | Monograph | 06.14.1232

Crescent Island: Eastbank Riverfront Park Master Plan, 1994Prepared by Hargreaves Associates for the City of Portland

This plan looks at East Bank revitalization that maintains the I-5 freeway. On the site, this plan utilizes the dramatic arc of the Marquam Bridge to frame the park, which becomes the center piece of the design.

Drawing on the curved overhead highway structure as well as the historical railroad piers, this project cuts a water canal through the site in a wide arc creating an island which references the incised bank of the past. The shape of the island is grated to create an amphitheater bowl.

The canal will be an active water feature with “rapids” to drown out freeway noise. This river feature would also be a hydraulic exhibit that would work in conjunction with OMSI.

Adjacent to Crescent Island is a paved plaza that steps down to the river, providing people access to the water. There are a series of water columns that extend the rhythm of the freeway columns, and would serve as a reminder of an important era if the freeway were to be removed in the future.

Page 33: University of Oregon Master's Thesis Monograph

33Urban Waterfronts Thesis 2011-2012

Crescent Park: East Bank 2040 Master Plan, 1998Prepared by Philip Goff & Joseph Karman for the University of Oregon

This plan is a large-scale urban plan that explores the removal of the I-5 freeway from the East Bank of downtown Portland. On the site just north of the current Marquam Bridge, a 600-foot fragment of the former freeway is retained as a sculptural element and a form generator. The area becomes a grassy amphitheater that creates a dialogue with “the bowl” on the west side of the river.

The space between the columns is infilled with buildings, and there are two large circulation towers that allow visitors to go up to the decks of the former freeway. The lower level is enclosed to create a gallery space for OMSI and the upper level becomes a public park. This becomes a major tourist attraction and viewing point for the city. The fragment of the freeway will have a powerful presence as a piece of Portland history. It will be a man-made icon that is unique to Portland and represents Portland’s stance on transportation.

Page 34: University of Oregon Master's Thesis Monograph

Stefanie Hanna-Riggs | Monograph | 06.14.1234

Space Function/Activities & Users Design Requirements

Social Amenities (Community Activities)Social Amenities (Community Activities)Social Amenities (Community Activities)

“Living Room”: Social center of the project Uses include: lobby, gathering space, waiting area, exhibition space, presentation space, a place to sit and relax, watch people, socialize

Large open space that is the center of the project.

Large-Scale Event Space Uses: large events, meetings, parties, lectures, dinners and banquets, dances, teen events, conferences, larger classes and programs, art openings and events, etc. This space can be rented out and will provide revenue for the Center.

Tall Ceiling Height; ~30’

Youth Activity Room This space will be used for educational programs, homework spaces, socialization, after-school programs, club meetings, indoor games (air hockey, ping-pong, pool, cards, boardgames), and special events.

Space should be able to be passively monitored

Caterer-Grade Community Kitchen & Eating Space (part of Community Center)

In the eating space, different groups can come in and cook on different nights (Monday could be Italian, Tuesday German, etc). The space will also be used by caterers when room are rented out for events, Can also be used for cooking classes.

Kitchen is caterer-grade and is used for events and meetings in other spaces

Café/Coffee Bar (run by the Community Center but can be access by the outside community)

uses: a social gathering place for people to meet up before or after a class or activity. This stand provides coffee, sandwiches, and other quick snacks.

3 main areas: Behind the counter area, que area, seating area.

Children’s Area Uses: short term childcare, children’s parties, parent-child classes, child classes, children’s arts and crafts, reading and story time activities

Security

Restaurant/Bar (separate but adjacent to Community Center)

Uses: A privately-run social gathering place for people to meet up before or after a class or activity. This will also attract people from around the city and serve as a publicly accessible function.

Areas: Kitchen, bar, seating area, hostess stand,

Educational Amenities

Computer Center This area contains computers for both classes and individual use. Some uses include: job search center, technology classes (computer basics, filmography, music editing, website design, any computer program), and homework space,

Security

Small Meeting Rooms (2 @ 400 sqft each) used for small meetings under 10 people. This could be any type of meeting, small classes, homework space, staff meetings, board and card games, etc.

This space is two spaces that can be combined into one

Large Classroom/Multipurpose Room Used for meetings, events, classes, etc. This space will accommodate a wide range of activities.

Multipurpose flooring, durable wall material, amble storage

Total Size of Building Note: some programming elements have been modified since this original programming document

Page 35: University of Oregon Master's Thesis Monograph

35Urban Waterfronts Thesis 2011-2012

Adjacencies, daylighting requirements

Environmental and ECS needs, furniture & equipment (F&E)

Notes Square Footage

Social Amenities (Community Activities)Social Amenities (Community Activities)Social Amenities (Community Activities)Social Amenities (Community Activities)

Must be the central space with many adjacencies. Bright, day lit space. ADJ: reception, entry

Comfortable Seating, information station, stand for exhibits

2,000

ADJ: separate access F&E: Tables/chairs (storage for both) 4,000

ADJ: not too isolated, somewhat secure. separate from children’s area. Daylighting necessary.

F&E: Seating, Computers, tables/chairs, storage, Game tables (ping-pong, pool, foosball, etc)

1,000

ADJ: must be near the event spaces and meeting rooms.

F&E: Kitchen Equipment: sink, refrigerator, freezer, counters, storage (shared and secured)

1,000

ADJ: accessible from outside, near “Living Room” where people can also enjoy snacks/drinks. Daylighting necessary.

F&E: behind the counter area (cash register, refrigerator), tables and chairs

300

ADJ: secure but near parents. Daylighting necessary.

F&E: children’s toys, shelves and storage for toys 900

ADJ: accessible from outside. Daylighting necessary.

F&E: Kitchen equipment, tables and chairs, storage for dishes and food.

2,000

ADJ: accessible various hours (applies to all in section)ADJ: accessible various hours (applies to all in section)

ADJ: accessible various hours ECS: good ventilation and cooling 600

ADJ: accessible various hours. Daylighting necessary.

ECS: ability for user to control 800

ADJ: accessible various hours. Daylighting necessary.

ECS: ability for user to control 1000

Page 36: University of Oregon Master's Thesis Monograph

Stefanie Hanna-Riggs | Monograph | 06.14.1236

Recreational Amenities (Indoor)

Sauna Social space to relax after a class or exercise

Hot Tub Social space to relax after a class or exercise

Lap Pool (10-lane) This pool is used for my physically strenuous activities: lap swimming, competition meets, team practice, kayak training classes, scuba classes, boat safety classes, water polo, party and special event rentals.

(6,000 square foot pool + 5,000 surrounding space).Tall Ceiling Height; ~30’. Deck space for seating of up to 300 spectators.

Fitness/Cardio Training Facility Used as a training facility for the sports and recreation offered on site. This space can be used during the off season to keep people in shape while not able to do the outdoor water sports. Uses: Weight training, conditioning classes, core training, injury rehabilitation, instructional programs (sports training), family and senior fitness classes/training

space for both cardio machines and weights. must be large enough for groups for team training.

Administration/Support SpaceAdministration/Support SpaceAdministration/Support SpaceCommunity Center Admin. Offices

At least 15 offices for staff Number and sizes TBD

Parks and Recreation Dept. Offices Provide a central, downtown location for some Park and Recreation Dept offices

Number and sizes TBD

Front Counter and Reception Seating and workspace for at least 3 staff places to display new materials and brochures, need area that can handle large groups

Locker Room Lockers, showers, sinks, restrooms

Restrooms Mens & women, outside of Locker Rooms

Storage Throughout building Number and sizes TBD

Net Interior Space

+ 15% Service

Gross Indoor Space

Space Function/Activities & Users Design Requirements

Social Amenities (Community Activities)Social Amenities (Community Activities)Social Amenities (Community Activities)

“Living Room”: Social center of the project Uses include: lobby, gathering space, waiting area, exhibition space, presentation space, a place to sit and relax, watch people, socialize

Large open space that is the center of the project.

Large-Scale Event Space Uses: large events, meetings, parties, lectures, dinners and banquets, dances, teen events, conferences, larger classes and programs, art openings and events, etc. This space can be rented out and will provide revenue for the Center.

Tall Ceiling Height; ~30’

Youth Activity Room This space will be used for educational programs, homework spaces, socialization, after-school programs, club meetings, indoor games (air hockey, ping-pong, pool, cards, boardgames), and special events.

Space should be able to be passively monitored

Caterer-Grade Community Kitchen & Eating Space (part of Community Center)

In the eating space, different groups can come in and cook on different nights (Monday could be Italian, Tuesday German, etc). The space will also be used by caterers when room are rented out for events, Can also be used for cooking classes.

Kitchen is caterer-grade and is used for events and meetings in other spaces

Café/Coffee Bar (run by the Community Center but can be access by the outside community)

uses: a social gathering place for people to meet up before or after a class or activity. This stand provides coffee, sandwiches, and other quick snacks.

3 main areas: Behind the counter area, que area, seating area.

Children’s Area Uses: short term childcare, children’s parties, parent-child classes, child classes, children’s arts and crafts, reading and story time activities

Security

Restaurant/Bar (separate but adjacent to Community Center)

Uses: A privately-run social gathering place for people to meet up before or after a class or activity. This will also attract people from around the city and serve as a publicly accessible function.

Areas: Kitchen, bar, seating area, hostess stand,

Educational Amenities

Computer Center This area contains computers for both classes and individual use. Some uses include: job search center, technology classes (computer basics, filmography, music editing, website design, any computer program), and homework space,

Security

Small Meeting Rooms (2 @ 400 sqft each) used for small meetings under 10 people. This could be any type of meeting, small classes, homework space, staff meetings, board and card games, etc.

This space is two spaces that can be combined into one

Large Classroom/Multipurpose Room Used for meetings, events, classes, etc. This space will accommodate a wide range of activities.

Multipurpose flooring, durable wall material, amble storage

Page 37: University of Oregon Master's Thesis Monograph

37Urban Waterfronts Thesis 2011-2012

ADJ: locker rooms (applies to all in section)ADJ: locker rooms (applies to all in section)

ADJ: locker rooms May be part of locker room or a public element. Also a social element.

300

ADJ: locker rooms May be part of locker room or a public element. Also a social element.

300

ADJ: locker rooms F&E: bleachers, benches and space for swimmers. Good ventilationProper lap pool flooringwater treatment area.

There is currently only one, aging pool that the city uses that is suitable for competitions and races. A pool with adequate space for observes is needed by the city, especially in such a central location.

11,000

ADJ: locker rooms F&E: weights, cardio equipment, mats, storage for all.

4,000

Administration/Support SpaceAdministration/Support SpaceAdministration/Support SpaceAdministration/Support SpaceDaylighting necessary. 1,500

Daylighting necessary. 1,500

Daylighting necessary. ADJ: lobby/”Living Room”

F&E: desks, chairs, display racks 300

ADJ: centrally accessible to pools, entry, Fitness center

May incorporate hot tubs/saunas 2,500

ADJ: centrally accessible 1,200

Should have some near the pool area, gym, children’s area, and kitchen, possibly more

Should have a lot of storage spread throughout the facility. This is something that all site visits have said their Community Center lacks.

2,000

38,200

general circulation, storage, mechanical, toiletsgeneral circulation, storage, mechanical, toiletsgeneral circulation, storage, mechanical, toilets 5,730

43,930

Adjacencies, daylighting requirements

Environmental and ECS needs, furniture & equipment (F&E)

Notes Square Footage

Social Amenities (Community Activities)Social Amenities (Community Activities)Social Amenities (Community Activities)Social Amenities (Community Activities)

Must be the central space with many adjacencies. Bright, day lit space. ADJ: reception, entry

Comfortable Seating, information station, stand for exhibits

2,000

ADJ: separate access F&E: Tables/chairs (storage for both) 4,000

ADJ: not too isolated, somewhat secure. separate from children’s area. Daylighting necessary.

F&E: Seating, Computers, tables/chairs, storage, Game tables (ping-pong, pool, foosball, etc)

1,000

ADJ: must be near the event spaces and meeting rooms.

F&E: Kitchen Equipment: sink, refrigerator, freezer, counters, storage (shared and secured)

1,000

ADJ: accessible from outside, near “Living Room” where people can also enjoy snacks/drinks. Daylighting necessary.

F&E: behind the counter area (cash register, refrigerator), tables and chairs

300

ADJ: secure but near parents. Daylighting necessary.

F&E: children’s toys, shelves and storage for toys 900

ADJ: accessible from outside. Daylighting necessary.

F&E: Kitchen equipment, tables and chairs, storage for dishes and food.

2,000

ADJ: accessible various hours (applies to all in section)ADJ: accessible various hours (applies to all in section)

ADJ: accessible various hours ECS: good ventilation and cooling 600

ADJ: accessible various hours. Daylighting necessary.

ECS: ability for user to control 800

ADJ: accessible various hours. Daylighting necessary.

ECS: ability for user to control 1000

Page 38: University of Oregon Master's Thesis Monograph

Stefanie Hanna-Riggs | Monograph | 06.14.1238

Building Program Diagram

Social Educational Admin/Support Spaces

400 sf each 300 sfLiving Room

2,000 sf

4,000 sf

Large Scale Event Space

Meeting Room

1,000 sf

Class Room

1,500 sfCommunity Center Admin Offcies

1,500 sf

Parks and Recreation Department Offices

Front Counter and Reception

2,500 sf

Locker Room

1,200 sf

Restrooms

2,000 sf

Storage

Cafe

Children’s Area

1,000 sf

Kitchen

1,000 sf

Youth Room

1,000 sf

300 sf

Computer Center600 sf

Page 39: University of Oregon Master's Thesis Monograph

39Urban Waterfronts Thesis 2011-2012

Recreational

Lap Pool

6,000 sf

Leisure Pool

5,000 sf

30,000 sf

Fitness/Cardio

4,000 sf

Hot Tub

 TBA sf

Sauna

 TBA sf

Page 40: University of Oregon Master's Thesis Monograph

Stefanie Hanna-Riggs | Monograph | 06.14.1240

Site Program Diagram

Park Area

Storage

Storage

Dock

Water Taxi Launch

Life Guard Station

Pool

11,000 sf

Basketball Court

4,000 sf

Children’s Play Area

2,000 sf

Waterfront W

alkway: Public Access

Social Educational Admin/Support SpacesRecreational Water Recreation

Page 41: University of Oregon Master's Thesis Monograph

41Urban Waterfronts Thesis 2011-2012

Adjacencies

Park Area

Storage

Storage

Dock

Water Taxi Launch

Life Guard Station

Pool

11,000 sf

Basketball Court

4,000 sf

Children’s Play Area

2,000 sf

Waterfront W

alkway: Public Access

2,500 sf

Locker Room

Living Room

2,000 sf

4,000 sf

Large Scale Event Space

1,000 sf

Class Room

Front Counter and Reception

1,200 sf

Restrooms

Cafe

Children’s Area

1,000 sf

Kitchen

1,000 sf

Youth Room

1,000 sf

Lap Pool

6,000 sf

11,000 sf

Fitness/Cardio

4,000 sf

Computer Center600 sf

Hot Tub

 TBA sf

Sauna

 TBA sf

Meeting Room

Restaurant/Bar

2,000 sf1,500 sf

Community Center Admin Offices

1,500 sf

Parks and Recreation Department Offices

Flexible Adjacencies

Page 42: University of Oregon Master's Thesis Monograph

Stefanie Hanna-Riggs | Monograph | 06.14.1242

PrecedentsProgrammatic Architectural Waterfront

Chelsea Piers NYC

Crissy Field, San Francisco

Copenhagen Harbor Bath, Copenhagen

Wembley National Stadium

Lake Oswego Community Center, Portland

Portland Community Centers, Portland

Southwest Community Center, Portland

Middleman Jewish Community Center, Portland

Partial X

Partial X

Partial X X

Partial X

X X

X

X X

X

East Portland Community Center & Pool Wembley National StadiumMatt Dishman Community Center

Page 43: University of Oregon Master's Thesis Monograph

43Urban Waterfronts Thesis 2011-2012

Chelsea Piers

Architect: Warren and Wetmore

Description: “The Chelsea Piers Sports & Entertainment Complex is a 28-acre waterfront sports village located between 17th and 23rd Streets along Manhattan’s Hudson River. This $120 million, privately-financed project opened in 1995, transforming four historic, but long-neglected, piers into a major center for public recreation and waterfront access.” Chelsea Piers includes the following entertainment and sports venues: Golf Club, Sports Center Health Club, Sky Rink, Field House, 300 New York, PIER SIXTY, THE LIGHTHOUSE, Maritime Center, and Studios.

Relevance: Chelsea Piers is also a large-scale recreation center, but the functions are more land-based than PACC will be. This is a good resource to get programming sizes for, especially for support spaces and interior sporting facilities.

Website: http://www.chelseapiers.com/about.htm

Mission Statement: “Chelsea Piers is committed to being the best amateur sports and entertainment complex in the country, with state-of-the-art facilities, cutting-edge programming, first-rate instruction and a courteous, professional staff. We are committed to making all guests feel welcome at Chelsea Piers and to providing an environment which is always CLEAN, SAFE, FRIENDLY and FUN. Chelsea Piers aims to improve the quality of life in New York by providing a place for all--adults, children, New Yorkers, visitors--to relax, play, learn and compete.”

Page 44: University of Oregon Master's Thesis Monograph

Stefanie Hanna-Riggs | Monograph | 06.14.1244

Crissy FieldArchitect: Hargreaves Associates

Description: The site which Crissy Field now occupies began as a tidal marsh and then evolved to a staging area for ships, a military airfield, and is now a recreational park with a recovered tidal marsh.

Relevance: This precedent is appropriate based on the initial and revitalized site purposes. This project took an industrial space and shifted it for recreational uses. This site is similar to the east side of Portland that has been dominated by traffic infrastructure and industrial uses, but could be converted to include recreational pedestrian uses.

Website: http://www.hargreaves.com/projects/PublicParks/CrissyField/

1925

Page 45: University of Oregon Master's Thesis Monograph

45Urban Waterfronts Thesis 2011-2012

Page 46: University of Oregon Master's Thesis Monograph

Stefanie Hanna-Riggs | Monograph | 06.14.1246

Copenhagen Harbour BathArchitect: PLOT (JDS architects and Bjarke Ingels Group)

Description: “Copenhagen’s harbour undertakes a transformation from an industrial and traffic junction towards being the city’s cultural and social center. The Harbour Bath design has emerged out of the desire of extending the surrounding park onto the water and the practical needs for accessibility, safety, and programmatic demand. The Harbour Bath realizes the transition from land to water as a terraced landscape.” ( http://www.big.dk)

Relevance: This project has a strong recreational water element that integrates creatively with the river. Portland Aquatic Community Center will also have an outdoor recreational aquatic space such as this one.

Website: http://www.big.dk/

Page 47: University of Oregon Master's Thesis Monograph

47Urban Waterfronts Thesis 2011-2012

Page 48: University of Oregon Master's Thesis Monograph

Stefanie Hanna-Riggs | Monograph | 06.14.1248

Wembley National StadiumLondon, U.K; 1996-2007

Architect: World Stadium Team/Norman Foster & HOK S+V+E

Description: The old Wembley Stadium, build in 1924, was one of the most important venues in Britain for sports, Olympic Games, concerts, and other events. An important feature of the new Wembley Stadium is the partially retractable roof which is supported by a 133-meter tall arch that creates an icon to replace the previous stadium’s landmark twin towers.

Relevance: This case study creates a new community landmark where there had previously been another. PACC will create a new landmark on the site where the freeway is currently providing a landmark of sorts.

Website: www.wembleystadium.com/

Page 49: University of Oregon Master's Thesis Monograph

49Urban Waterfronts Thesis 2011-2012

Page 50: University of Oregon Master's Thesis Monograph

Stefanie Hanna-Riggs | Monograph | 06.14.1250

Lake Oswego Community Center (proposed)Architect: Boora Architects

Description: Lake Oswego Community Center is a proposed local community center in Portland. The project includes community activities, aquatics, indoor recreation and outdoor recreation.

Relevance: This project has many of the same programmatic elements including pools, recreation spaces, and community rooms, but the Portland Aquatic Community Center (PACC) would have more aquatic elements that relate to the river. A major difference that would have to be addressed is that the Lake Oswego Community Center is a project for the local community whereas the PACC is going to be a draw for the entire region. Total area of this project is double the project area of PACC at 114,000, so many of the support spaces in this programming document have been halved in size. This project is not yet built, but there are good programmatic comparisons to be made.

First Floor PlanLake Oswego Community Center

boora architects03.07.07

N

Second Floor Plan

Room Legend

1. elevator2. storage3. womens restroom4. mens restroom5. open to below6. storage/ work room7. group exercise room8. walking track with stretching area

10. yoga/ pilates room 11. outdoor terrace/ program expansion 12. parks and recreation

13. multipurpose activity room 14. 17,500 sf space reserved for library options15. 65,000 sf library expansion16. adult multipurpose room17. mechanical room

prop

erty

line

kruse way dani

el w

ay

30

31 28

29

2725

26

24 23

24 23

3

22

4

2

21

35 34

12

36

11

10 9

8

13

20

17

1

5

6

8

15

14

14

14

14

16

18

19

21

43

1

37

33

32

3131

841414141

40

42

42

39

7

8

8

22

kruse way

dani

el w

ay

prop

erty

line

32

13

7

4

5

5

5

5

95

8

1

2

12

1

14

15

43

5

14

11

6

10

3 4

16

17

17

Room Legend

1. building entry2. control desk3. center administration4. youth/ teen activity room5. gymnasium6. loading, service + garbage yard7. heater mechanical + chemical room8. pool storage9. seating deck for 250 people10.10 lane lap pool11. stormwater pond12. sun terrace13. recreation pool14. family changing room15. womens locker room16. mens locker room

19. locker vestibule20. lifeguard room21. special events room22. small meeting room23. mens restroom24. womens restroom25. child watch activity room26. outdoor play area27. library/ kitchen loading service28. catering kitchen29. community hall storage30. community hall terrace31. community hall32. 43,000 sf library expansion33. 17,500 sf reserved for library options34. community family room hearth35. cafe/ juice bar36. 15,000 sf skate park37. walking/ jogging path38. not used39. 65,000 sf library expansion40. therapy pool

42. elevator43. technology center

First Floor PlanLake Oswego Community Center

boora architects03.07.07

N

Second Floor Plan

Room Legend

1. elevator2. storage3. womens restroom4. mens restroom5. open to below6. storage/ work room7. group exercise room8. walking track with stretching area

10. yoga/ pilates room 11. outdoor terrace/ program expansion 12. parks and recreation

13. multipurpose activity room 14. 17,500 sf space reserved for library options15. 65,000 sf library expansion16. adult multipurpose room17. mechanical room

prop

erty

line

kruse way dani

el w

ay

30

31 28

29

2725

26

24 23

24 23

3

22

4

2

21

35 34

12

36

11

10 9

8

13

20

17

1

5

6

8

15

14

14

14

14

16

18

19

21

43

1

37

33

32

3131

841414141

40

42

42

39

7

8

8

22

kruse way

dani

el w

ay

prop

erty

line

32

13

7

4

5

5

5

5

95

8

1

2

12

1

14

15

43

5

14

11

6

10

3 4

16

17

17

Room Legend

1. building entry2. control desk3. center administration4. youth/ teen activity room5. gymnasium6. loading, service + garbage yard7. heater mechanical + chemical room8. pool storage9. seating deck for 250 people10.10 lane lap pool11. stormwater pond12. sun terrace13. recreation pool14. family changing room15. womens locker room16. mens locker room

19. locker vestibule20. lifeguard room21. special events room22. small meeting room23. mens restroom24. womens restroom25. child watch activity room26. outdoor play area27. library/ kitchen loading service28. catering kitchen29. community hall storage30. community hall terrace31. community hall32. 43,000 sf library expansion33. 17,500 sf reserved for library options34. community family room hearth35. cafe/ juice bar36. 15,000 sf skate park37. walking/ jogging path38. not used39. 65,000 sf library expansion40. therapy pool

42. elevator43. technology center

Page 51: University of Oregon Master's Thesis Monograph

51Urban Waterfronts Thesis 2011-2012

interior community family room perspective

26

Page 52: University of Oregon Master's Thesis Monograph

Stefanie Hanna-Riggs | Monograph | 06.14.1252

Portland Community CentersRefer to “Site Visits and Interview” section for a table of Portland’s Community Centers.

Description: Portland Parks & Recreation “operates 13 community centers, 11 SUN community schools, 13 swim pools, indoor and outdoor tennis courts, the Community Music Center and Multnomah Arts Center, and many other facilities” with more than 5,000 activities for every age.

Relevance: PACC’s client is Portland Parks & Recreation Department, which runs all of these community centers. While PACC will be another one of these community centers, it will target a much broader group of people from around the Portland metro area due to its unique location on the river.

Website: http://www.portlandonline.com/parks/

Montavilla Community CenterMt Scott Community Center Peninsula Park Community Center

Page 53: University of Oregon Master's Thesis Monograph

53Urban Waterfronts Thesis 2011-2012

Matt Dishman Community Center Map of City of Portland Community Centers

Page 54: University of Oregon Master's Thesis Monograph

Stefanie Hanna-Riggs | Monograph | 06.14.1254

Southwest Community CenterSite Visit & Interview

Architect: Boora Architects

Description: The Southwest Community Center is one of the 13 Community Centers run by the City of Portland Parks and Recreation Department. SWCC is the most recently constructed of Portland’s community centers, and the first that is entirely new construction in over 50 years. For this project’s amenities, refer to “Site Visits and Interview’s” section on page 42.

Relevance: This project has very similar programmatic elements as PACC. This is also a good precedent in terms of scale since the size of the interior spaces (40,000 sf) is slightly smaller than that of PACC.

Website: http://www.portlandonline.com/parks/

Preschool

Display Office

Event Room (Dividable)

Event Room (Dividable)

Kitchen

GymLockers/Storage/Staff Room

Lap Pool

Leisure Pool

Hot Tub

Childcare/Event (Dividable)

Offices

Reception

Fitness Studio Gym/Weight 

Room

Hall

Adjacency/Plan Diagram based on personal site visit Leisure Pool water feature

Page 55: University of Oregon Master's Thesis Monograph

55Urban Waterfronts Thesis 2011-2012

Exterior View

Page 56: University of Oregon Master's Thesis Monograph

Stefanie Hanna-Riggs | Monograph | 06.14.1256

Mittleman Jewish Community CenterSite Visit & Interview

Architect: Building has been modified in many stages since 1971.

Description: The Mittleman Jewish Community Center is a community center that is adjacent to and associated with the Portland Jewish Academy (PJA, a K-8 school) next door.

Relevance: MJCC has many of the same facilities as a public community center.

Website: http://www.portlandjewishacademy.org

Additional Facilities in the Basement• 3 racquet ball courts• 2 group fitness rooms• 1 Gym/Weight room• 2 massage studios• 1 pilates studio• 2 locker rooms with jacuzzi, sauna, sitting area, and toiletry

area• Staff Lounge• Administration offices (8)• Childcare facility• Large Laundry Room

Notes from Site Visit & Interview:• Warm water therapy pool: There is a separate entrance with handicap

parking right outside. There are changing stalls next to the pool for convenience of physically handicapped people.

• Administration Offices: There are 8 small ones. There are not enough.• People knew each other’s names.

Page 57: University of Oregon Master's Thesis Monograph

57Urban Waterfronts Thesis 2011-2012

Living Room

Info Wall

History Wall

Reception

Gym Pool

Cafe

BallroomSecurity/Entry

Soccer Dome

Adjacency/Plan Diagram of ground floor based on personal site visit

Page 58: University of Oregon Master's Thesis Monograph

Stefanie Hanna-Riggs | Monograph | 06.14.1258

Site Visits and InterviewsPortland Community Centers: Arranged by proximity to site.

Community Center Address Phone Number Basketball Community Center

Fitness Center

Matt Dishman Community Center & Pool 77 NE Knott St   503-823-3673 Indoor X X

Hillside Community Center 653 NW Culpepper Terr   503-823-3181 Indoor X

Sellwood Community Center 1436 SE Spokane St   503-823-3195 Indoor X

The following are at least 5 miles away from the siteThe following are at least 5 miles away from the siteThe following are at least 5 miles away from the siteThe following are at least 5 miles away from the siteThe following are at least 5 miles away from the siteThe following are at least 5 miles away from the site

Woodstock Community Center 5905 SE 43rd Ave   503-823-3633 X

Mt Scott Community Center & Pool 5530 SE 72nd Ave   503-823-3183 Indoor X X

Fulton Park Community Center 68 SW Miles St   503-823-3180 Indoor X X

Southwest Community Center & Pool 6820 SW 45th Ave   503-823-2840 Indoor X X

Multnomah Arts Center 7688 SW Capitol Hwy  503-823-2787 X X

Montavilla Community Center & Pool 8219 NE Glisan St   503-823-4101 Indoor X

Peninsula Park Community Center & Pool 700 N Rosa Parks Way   503-823-3620 Indoor X

East Portland Community Center & Pool 740 SE 106th Ave   503-823-3450 Indoor X X

University Park Community Center 9009 N Foss Ave   503-823-3631 Indoor X X

St. Johns Community Center 8427 N Central St   503-823-3192 Indoor X

Page 59: University of Oregon Master's Thesis Monograph

59Urban Waterfronts Thesis 2011-2012

Gym Meeting/Party Room

Kitchen Pools Site Visit Extras

X X Indoor Planned Stage – indoor, statue or public art, weight room.

X Rock Climbing Wall

X X X Picnic tables, playground, and wedding site – reservable.

The following are at least 5 miles away from the siteThe following are at least 5 miles away from the siteThe following are at least 5 miles away from the siteThe following are at least 5 miles away from the siteThe following are at least 5 miles away from the siteThe following are at least 5 miles away from the site

X X X Indoor Planned Roller skating, stage – indoor, weight room.

X X Indoor Stage

X X X (non-caterer grade)

Indoor (2) X Rock climbing wall, weight room, and wireless Internet access.

X X Picnic tables, playground, wedding site – reservable, and wireless Internet access.

X X X Outdoor Planned

X X Outdoor Planned

X X X Indoor Rock Climbing Wall, weight room

X X Computer lab, rock climbing wall, stage – indoor, statue or public art, weight room, and wireless Internet access.

X X X Rock climbing wall, and stage – indoor.

Interviews/Visits• Talked to Blaine from the Southwest Community Center during a site visit• Talked to Jennifer Harrington from the Mittleman Jewish Community Center during a site visit• Someone from Multnomah Athletic Club (http://www.themac.com/). • Portland State Rec Center.

Page 60: University of Oregon Master's Thesis Monograph

Stefanie Hanna-Riggs | Monograph | 06.14.1260

Page 61: University of Oregon Master's Thesis Monograph

Appendix B: East Bank Master Plan

Page 62: University of Oregon Master's Thesis Monograph

The east bank of Portland, 1912, Source: City of Portland Archives

Page 63: University of Oregon Master's Thesis Monograph

Table of Contents

May 1975, source: http://vintageportland.wordpress.com/Introduction 65History of the East Bank 66Ecological Factors 68River Use and Transportation 69Portland CEID History 70The CEID 71Willamette Valley Floods: 1996 & 1894 72Flood Plain 73Topographic Map & Current Figure Ground 74Current Zoning 75Current Freeway 76Transportation Options 77Marquam Bridge Distribution 78Tunnel Proposal 79Diversion: Ross Island Super Bridge 80Land Use: Public Access 81

Page 64: University of Oregon Master's Thesis Monograph

Stefanie Hanna-Riggs | Monograph | 06.14.1264

This document was prepared by Stefanie Hanna-Riggs, Scott Kosmecki, and David Taylor for Prof. Gerry Gast’s Urban Waterfront Thesis.

Image: Eastbank Riverfront Park, 1997

Page 65: University of Oregon Master's Thesis Monograph

65Urban Waterfronts Thesis 2011-2012

The purpose of this investigation is to create a viable working alternative to the land use issues in the area located between I-84 and Powell Blvd. and from the Willamette River to 12th street. This area is known as the Central Eastside Industrial District (CEID) and has essentially been marked by the city of Portland as an industrial sanctuary, whereby little development can take place that does not specifically require the land to be used for manufacturing uses. Each lot is allowed a maximum of 3,000sf of office space, and all other uses must be manufacturing or storage in nature. This requirement has stagnated development in the district while the rest of the city has experienced some of the largest development growth in recent decades.

GOALSThe goals of this analysis is to describe a framework for development that is respective of the existing building stock, the expansion of the manufacturing nature of the district, and also allows for the needed densification of the area to standards that the city is looking for in it’s 2040 plan. This will include a new investigation into the repair of the Eastbank of the Willamette River and civic and public spaces designed that take advantage of this. The overall goal is to encourage manufacturing alongside living in this unique and exciting part of the city.

HOW TO GET THERE FROM HERE...To achieve these goals, this study has investigated physical changes in the infrastructure of the district in two main categories; transportation & land use.

TRANSPORTATIONThis plan addresses the relocation of I-5 between the Marquam/I-405 interchange to the south and the I-84 interchange to the north.

LAND USEThis document concludes with three different land use options that will later be converged into one land use plan. Some of the goals for the different land use plans include designing for the growth of light manufacturing, increasing residential housing for middle-income earners, and creating civic and public spaces for all of Portland to enjoy that focus on the Willamette.

Introduction

Page 66: University of Oregon Master's Thesis Monograph

Stefanie Hanna-Riggs | Monograph | 06.14.1266

History of the East Bank

The city of Portland, Oregon, located at the confluence of the Willamette and Colombia Rivers, was settled for its advantageous shipping position. When the city was laid out in 1845, it was never planned to include land on both sides of the Willamette, but rather just the west bank.

The City of East Portland

In 1868, mainline railroad tracks were constructed on the east bank, an area which was mainly comprised of farmers at the time. Immediately following the railroad, the east bank became the incorporated city of East Portland in 1870. The population of 1500 people was connected to the west bank by two ferries that continuously crossed the river.

In 1887, Portland first bridge, the Morrison Bridge, was opened, allowing trolleys to connect neighborhoods on both sides of the river. In 1891, East Portland and Portland merged into one city with about 25% of the population living on the east side.

Image: Eastbank Riverfront Park, 1997

One city with two distinct characters

Even following the merger, the two sides of the river maintained their distinct characters, a fact that persists today. Today the east side of Portland has many distinct neighborhoods including the Central Industrial District, the historic Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd./Grand Ave. District, Buckman, Lloyd District, and dozens of additional neighborhoods. Overall, the city of Portland has over 90 different neighborhoods, with a large housing stock and many industrial jobs being found on the east side.

The east bank of the Willamette is layered and ad-hoc: marshes, docks, sandbars, bluffs and wharves have come and gone with time. Land has been created by filling or excavating. Many buildings, factories, and embankments have been constructed, used, and then demolished to make way for the next layer of development.

Figure Ground showing the scale of industrial vs. residential

Page 67: University of Oregon Master's Thesis Monograph

67Urban Waterfronts Thesis 2011-2012

The 1950s and the Car

In the 1950s, many American cities began to turn away from their ports and focus on vehicular transportation. Portland was not immune to this movement, and in the 1960’s, abandoned docks and wharves were replaced by the I-5 freeway along the east bank. At the time, the land was considered “left over” with little monetary value. The freeway radically shifted the east bank’s land form, providing minimal waterfront access and depriving the city of half of its waterfront property.

Harbor Drive

In 1970, the west bank’s expressway, Harbor Drive, was removed and a large water front park was constructed in its place. Tom McCall Waterfront Park is now one of the largest public spaces in Portland and is used year-round as a place for all of Portland to come together. This precedent shows that with the correct timing, people, and plan, waterfront freeway removal is possible, especially in a city like Portland.

Image: Eastbank Riverfront Park, 1997

Historical Context Map

Postcard showing Harbor Drive

Page 68: University of Oregon Master's Thesis Monograph

Stefanie Hanna-Riggs | Monograph | 06.14.1268

Ecological FactorsThere are ecological factors that can explain why Portland developed as it did. The west side of the river is much higher, thus dryer and less prone to flooding, making it the natural choice for initial settlement. The east bank is lower and prone to flooding, which forced settlement to occur farther back from the river. This created the “left over” or low value land mentioned in the previous section.

A settlement pattern emerged with development occurring inland from the marsh, and transportation connecting the settlement to the docks and piers. This created a strong architectural edge that can be seen currently along the historic MLK Jr/Grand area. With time, this dividing marsh began to be filled in with earth and debris, and the in-fill was eventually finished for the construction of the I-5.

Image: Gary A. KorhonenImage: Eastbank Riverfront Park, 1997

Page 69: University of Oregon Master's Thesis Monograph

69Urban Waterfronts Thesis 2011-2012

Hydrological Issues

River levels in the Willamette vary seasonally based on the Willamette Valley rainfall and the Colombia River. The highest river height occurs in the winter and spring between December and June, which coincides with the highest level of river use during the spring. The water level was studied extensively before the East Bank Esplanade was constructed in order to provide year round continuous access.

There are several agencies that have authority in this area when considering proposed fill, either as piers, docks, or solid materials. These agencies include the Oregon Division of State Lands, the National Marine Fisheries Service, various branches of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, and the Oregon Marine Board, amongst others.

River Use and TransportationThe Willamette is a deep water channel that presents a unique opportunity to have large, ocean-going vessels dock downtown as far south as the Morrison Bridge. Shallower vessels and barges are able to continue upstream to the south. The highest level of river use can be found between the Morrison and Ross Island Bridges where there are many power vehicles as well as recreational rowing uses.

A river taxi system has been proposed multiple times in order to provide greater public access to the water. This would also create direct connections between the different destinations along the river. This allows the Willamette to become a major transportation mode to the public.

Fishing occurs along the east bank, especially in the areas around the Steel Bridge, and between the Hawthorne and Marquam Bridges.

Page 70: University of Oregon Master's Thesis Monograph

Stefanie Hanna-Riggs | Monograph | 06.14.1270

Portland CEID History

The Central Eastside Industrial District has a history of being designated specifically for manufacturing and currently is considered an “industrial Sanctuary” by the city. This means that the only businesses that are allowed legally in the district are manufacturers or are supportive of the manufacturing process (storage primarily). In addition, a maximum of 3,000sf per lot is allowed for office space, and these strict regulations have kept most development projects out of the district in the recent past. In 1964 the Interstate-five corridor was built through Portland and where most of the freeway is submerged throughout the city, the stretch that lies next to the Willamette River was put on grade. This amounted to cutting the eastside off from any river access and still remains as a barrier to this day.

SE Yamhill & Water, 1931

Image: http://vintgeportland.wordpress.com/ Image: Scott Kosmecki

SE Yamhill & Water, 2011

Page 71: University of Oregon Master's Thesis Monograph

71Urban Waterfronts Thesis 2011-2012

Central Reach of the Willamette River, 2010Source: Google Maps composite

The Central Eastside Industrial District (CEID) is a section of Portland that runs between Powell Blvd. and I-84 to the north, and from 12th Ave. to the Willamette River to the west. This project is investigating what the Central Eastside Industrial District (CEID) will look like once Interstate-five has been eliminated from the east bank of the Willamette River and how the existing and historic manufacturing sanctuary could be maintained for new light manufacturing enterprises. After the current I-5 removal, a blueprint is going to be needed that helps maintain the area’s historic connection as a manufacturing center in the city. Without a plan, elevated land prices in the CEID would certainly push out remaining manufacturing jobs to less expensive suburban sites, depriving the city of much needed middle-class jobs in the central area, and end a rich history of manufacturing in the district.

The CEID N

Page 72: University of Oregon Master's Thesis Monograph

Stefanie Hanna-Riggs | Monograph | 06.14.1272

Willamette Valley Floods: 1996 & 1894The flood of 1996 was part of a larger series of floods that occurred in the Pacific Northwest between late-January to mid-February, 1996. The flood extended far past the Willamette Valley all the way to the Oregon Coast to the west and the Cascade Mountains to the east. Washington, Idaho, and California were also affected by the flooding.

The Willamette River crested at 28.6 feet, which is 10.6 feet above the flood stage. The river came within inches of overflowing the seawall on the west bank of downtown Portland. There was a major effort by civilians and the Oregon National Guard to use sandbags to control the flooding into downtown.

3rd & Alder, Flood of 1894

Page 73: University of Oregon Master's Thesis Monograph

73Urban Waterfronts Thesis 2011-2012

This map represents the existing topography of the area with an overlay representing the 100 and 500 year flood marks.

50

50

100 Year Flood Plain500 Year Flood Plain

Flood Plain

N

Page 74: University of Oregon Master's Thesis Monograph

Stefanie Hanna-Riggs | Monograph | 06.14.1274

Topographic Map Although most of the eastbank of the Willamette has been filled and altered from it’s natural state, the topo-graphic lines show that it resembles more of a natural sloping condition than does the vertical seawall on the westbank. The introduction of two inlets on the eastbank will return some parts of the bank to the river, and give Portlanders an expanded area for experiencing the Willamette.

Topographic Map & Current Figure Ground

50

50

NN

Page 75: University of Oregon Master's Thesis Monograph

75Urban Waterfronts Thesis 2011-2012

Current Zoning

Image: Eastbank Riverfront Park, 1997

This map shows the current zoning and design overlays in the east bank as well as along the Willamette and across the river. Most of the area this study is concerned with is currently zoned as Industrial of some sort.

New zoning and land use will be addressed with the urban plans.

N

Page 76: University of Oregon Master's Thesis Monograph

Stefanie Hanna-Riggs | Monograph | 06.14.1276

Current Freeway

Image: Eastbank Riverfront Park, 1997

Freeway Diagram showing height above the ground

From the Burnside Bridge to the Hawthorne Bridge, the freeway is on grade. This creates a physical barrier for people to access the water.

Most of the rest of the freeway is elevated to different degrees, creating usable spaces in some instances. These spaces have minimized sun access, created concrete “ceilings,” and increased noise in the area.

There are two areas located at either end of the freeway where the structure is so high above the ground level that the space is not as impacted by the above issues. These areas are circled in red below.

N

Page 77: University of Oregon Master's Thesis Monograph

77Urban Waterfronts Thesis 2011-2012

Transportation Options

This plan explores three different transportation schemes to remove the I-5 Freeway from East Portland. The schemes explore a range of budget options.

All schemes assume the re-routing of the I-5 from its current location on the east bank to the current I-405. This would involve improvements to the current I-405, as well as increased diversion to the I-205 for traffic that does not need city access. The I-205 diversion would involve improved signage to encourage use.

I-205 Current I-5 Current I-405New I-5

N N

Page 78: University of Oregon Master's Thesis Monograph

Stefanie Hanna-Riggs | Monograph | 06.14.1278

This scheme addresses the lowest level of infrastructure changes, maintaining the Marquam Bridge as an exit from the new I-5 and re-routing the reduced traffic load onto Mill and Market. Another variation of this scheme involves maintaining the position of the Marquam Bridge, but replacing it with a small, lower bridge that is at a more appropriate, local scale.

Common Diversion Scheme Information

This scheme replaces the I-5 Corridor with pairs of one-way arterials at MLK & Grand, and 9th & 12th. These North-South pairs are connected to East-West running I-84 and Division St. Each pair has 4-6 lanes that can accommodate 40’ containers and have limited traffic lights at only major intersections.

Lloyd Blvd. is utilized along with added ramp access to I-84. New bridges across I-84 at these intersections link the now separated Lloyd district to the CEID. There are two pairs of on and off ramps to I-84 and thereby I-5 north. There are connections to I-5 at the lowered Marquam Bridge accessed now by Division St.

This allows the area west of MLK to have a more pedestrian friendly feel to it, while allowing greater access to transportation than the district currently has.

This scheme reclaims 40 acres of land from the highway removal and its various ramp structures and maximizes the existing grid of surface streets. This grid is also altered by the removal of Sandy Blvd. west of it’s intersection with Burnside St, reclaiming another 6 acres of land and fixing one of the city’s more difficult intersections.

Marquam Bridge Distribution

Burnside

Morrison

Hawthorne

Marquam

Ross Island

Milwaukie

N

Page 79: University of Oregon Master's Thesis Monograph

79Urban Waterfronts Thesis 2011-2012

Tunnel Proposal The tunnel scheme is the most intensive and extensive scheme proposed. Its goal is to create one clean unobstructed path under the city for all cross-

Starting with the removal of the Marquam Bridge, Interstate, cross-

Island super-bridge. After crossing the Willimatte from West to East, the new stretch of interstate 5 would turn North and start to descend until it was below grade into a tunnel. The tunnel entrance and exit on the south side of downtown Portland would begin before SE Division St., and underneath the city between SE Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd. and SE Grand Ave. On the North side of the city, the tunnel would reconnect with the existing I-5 and I-84 infrastructure North of NE Davis St.

East Bank’s water edge for development, but it would also remove the highway entirely as an obstacle for any East Portland future East Portland redevelopment project. A common concern about the tunnel proposal is the availability of truck access into and out of East Portland. This concern would also apply to people that work or live in the area. The idea for the proposal would be that all commercial and pedestrian would enter and exit East Portland from the North and South extremities of the central districts near the tunnel’s entrance points. No entrance and exit point would be available inside the tunnel to East Portland to alleviate congestion nodes. The idea is that the tunnel would be an express route under city that could by pass East Portlandall together. The main consequence of the tunnel proposal is that it would consume the most resources. Time to completion, money, and construction area would be the most expansive. Despite the consequences the tunnel proposal is still the most comprehensive scheme to solve Portland’s transportation issues.

Tunnel Proposal

N

Page 80: University of Oregon Master's Thesis Monograph

Stefanie Hanna-Riggs | Monograph | 06.14.1280

N

MAJORINTERSECTION

IMPROVEMENTS

This scheme replaces the section of the I-5 Corridor that blocks the eastside of the city from the Willamette River with improvements to two pairs of one-way arterials at MLK & Grand, and 9th & 12th streets. Thereby reclaiming over 50 acres of land and maximizing the existing grid of surface streets. Also included is a new “Super Bridge” in place of where the Ross Island bridge is currently that becomes a new, simplified accessway to I-5 into SE Portland.

The North-South pairs are connected to east-west running I-84 and Powell blvd. Each pair has 4-6 lanes that can accommodate 40’ containers and have limited traffic lights at only major intersections. One new pair of ramps specifically designed for commercial traffic is also introduced that connects the freeway system to a new truck route throughout the district.

Lloyd Blvd. is utilized along with a double pair of ramps to I-84. New bridges across the I-84 trench at 9th & 12th streets, as well as a new road that runs on the south side of I-84, connects these new access ways to the MLK/Grand couplet and better links the Lloyd District to the CEID. Along with the removal of Sandy blvd. west of 12th street, a far simplified city grid is created that allows greater access to transportation than the district currently has. All with less property takes from individuals than the square feet discov-ered for new building projects.

Historic buildings are untouched for renovation, over 50 acres of new land is made available for development and recreation, and the Industrial Sanctuary is greatly expanded.

DIVERSION - Ross Island Super BridgeDiversion: Ross Island Super Bridge

Page 81: University of Oregon Master's Thesis Monograph

81Urban Waterfronts Thesis 2011-2012

Land Use: Public AccessThis plan focuses on civic spaces along the waterfront, especially along the southern part of the project near OMSI.

In this plan, the yellow refers to civic spaces that also include public functions that bring people to the area. These could be libraries, theaters, community centers, sports centers, shops, public plazas, and anything else that is open to the general public.

The emphasis on public space along the water front integrates with the public right of way where the East Bank Esplanade is currently located. This plan will maintain, improve, and expand the esplanade to create ample room for foot and bike traffic along the waterfront.

There are many similarities with the previous plan, but this plan is centered more on people, movement towards the river, and public spaces. This plan has smaller blocks to create frequent access to the water for cars as well as bicyclists and pedestrians.

The threshold where the water meets the land is still being explored, and some of the civic spaces may become parks or pull back from the water to create larger spaces on the waterfront.

LIGHT MANUFACTURINGMIXED-USEHOUSING

RETAIL FRONTAGECIVIC SPACESCOMMERCIAL

PARKS/ RECREATIONSCHOOLS

PARKING GARAGESHISTORICAL BUILDINGS

P

ZERO

WAT

ER

1ST

2ND

3RD

Hawthorne

Milwaukie

Marquam

Light Rail

OMSI

OMSI Expansion

OMSIExpansion

OMSIExpansion

Stre

et C

ar L

ine

P

Page 82: University of Oregon Master's Thesis Monograph

[email protected]

Stefanie Hanna-Riggs

Page 83: University of Oregon Master's Thesis Monograph