4
being used as soldiers, apart from this working paper, few delega- tions have suggested meaningful solutions. The delegate from Egypt suggested the obvious, “[The children should] find other things to do with their free time.” Kendsie Hunter In the morning session of the SOCHUM committee, the use of child soldiers was of main concern. The nations of China, Brazil and Russia are collaborating to form a work- ing paper that makes the use of child soldiers more civi- lized. “We can’t tell countries that they can’t use [child sol- diers],” Brazil’s SOCHUM representative Chris Grady said. The working paper covers subjects such as psychologi- cal help and education for child soldiers. It also agrees with keeping the international draft age of 18 but making the international volunteer age to be 15. “They become child soldiers because they are homeless, their parents are probably dead, or they have nothing to look forward to,” Grady said, “They are emotionally and psychologically different after fighting.” Integration back into society is a point on which the work- ing paper focuses. After children have been to war, they are changed by the im- ages that they have seen. The countries of China, Russia and Brazil would like to see Interim Care Centers made for children while they serve in the army to help children succeed in life after fighting. “We need to make sure that their literacy is good and that they get education and psy- chological help,” Russia’s representative said. Despite the committee’s frustration with children The Use Of Child Soldiers Perplexes Many in SOCHUM University of Michigan Model United Nations The Daily Planet Friday, January 12, 2007 Issue 2 Dale Dorlin Human trafficking- the words on everyone’s lips- was the starting point for today’s session. The feeling in the room today was frus- tration as none of the dele- gates gave answers; they only voiced problems. Delegations expressed the need to address the prevention of prostitution and the prosecution of the convicted human traffickers. Yet within the debate there is no clear solution. A delegate of Djibouti, Ebony Wright, says, “You can’t stop the demand but you can stop the supply. By providing other opportunities for these people, they will be less vulnerable to being trapped in by traffic.” Dji- bouti feels that there should be enforcement on human trafficking laws and increased awareness and that weak statements are not valued in the discussion of this topic. The United States believes that the creation of an inter- national standard needs to be put in place. This standard must define human traffickers and victims. Without doing so, the UN cannot go about the process of rehabilitation and reform. The US also has a tier system, a way of rank- ing nations from the least to the most problematic. The US, would like to work with their Tier 3 nations, ranked lower than Tier 1 or Tier 2, to establish prevention, among these nations are Belize and Cuba. Currently the countries of Australia, United Kingdom and Argentina are forming a resolu- tion involving the prosecution of human traffickers and the men who are using children and women for human trafficking. Sophie Thomas, a delegate from Australia, says,”Everyone’s on board. I feel that it is a step to- wards fully and completely elimi- nating the problem of human trafficking.” On the flipside to the frustration of passive and negli- gent statements, everyone seems to be going with the flow. Ac- cording to Thailand’s representa- tive, Aaron Decker, the process is running smoothly. Decker says, “We’re working together and we hope that we can keep it this way.” Security Council Stalemate Zach Yancer A sharply divided Security Council spent the morning deliberating, unfortunately failing to either arrive at a consensus or advance the debate beyond Iranian nuclear capability. The existing sanctions imposed on Iran call for the Iranian government to provide a comprehensive report regarding the con- dition of their nuclear program within sixty days, twenty-one days have already passed. Although the Council was divided on many is- sues, the chief problem is that Iran has expressed verbally that it has no intentions of halting Uranium enrichment or dismantling any existing programs. Although the majority of the council favored to give Iran the benefit of the doubt, the delegates from Slovakia, United Kingdom, and the United States opted for a preemptive resolution in response to the Iranian delegate’s comments. Such a resolution would respond to Iranian noncompliance and would take effect at a prescribed date, shortly after the sixty day timetable expired. The Russian Federation and Ghana relentlessly countered a preemptive resolution, arguing that by taking action before the Council received the offi- cial report from Iran a preemptive resolution would undermine the credibility of the Council; further- more, this action would incite deeper Iranian isola- tion, forcing the nation to retreat from a return to diplomatic talks. Early on France attempted to table the issue of Iran and move onto the Darfur crisis; however, this was voted down and the deadlock continued. During the course of the meeting several written questions were relayed to the delegate from Iran. When asked whether it was true that Iran was slow- ing down its nuclear program the Iranian delegate responded, “Absolutely not, Iran has no intentions of halting its nuclear program.” Iran later added, “Iran would be open to direct talks with the United States,” further adding, “Iran will not be intimidated by sanctions, and that these sanctions only provoke a more hostile diplomatic course for Tehran. These comments gave many in the Council ap- parent proof that further sanctions, as requested by the UK and US, are a poor decision. However, the delegate from the United Kingdom did end discus- sion on the very relevant point that, as he stated, “No nation in the right state of mind would tell the Council that sanctions on themselves would resolve the problem.” Necessity: We Need Traffic Control

University of Michigan Model United Nations The Daily Planet › ~ummun › pdf › Issue 2.pdfquestions were relayed to the delegate from Iran. When asked whether it was true that

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    4

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • being used as soldiers, apart from

    this working paper, few delega-

    tions have suggested meaningful

    solutions. The delegate from

    Egypt suggested the obvious,

    “[The children should] find other

    things to do with their free time.”

    Kendsie Hunter

    In the morning session of the

    SOCHUM committee, the

    use of child soldiers was of

    main concern. The nations of

    China, Brazil and Russia are

    collaborating to form a work-

    ing paper that makes the use

    of child soldiers more civi-

    lized.

    “We can’t tell countries that

    they can’t use [child sol-

    diers],” Brazil’s SOCHUM

    representative Chris Grady

    said.

    The working paper covers

    subjects such as psychologi-

    cal help and education for

    child soldiers. It also agrees

    with keeping the international

    draft age of 18 but making

    the international volunteer

    age to be 15.

    “They become child soldiers

    because they are homeless,

    their parents are probably

    dead, or they have nothing to

    look forward to,” Grady said,

    “They are emotionally and

    psychologically different

    after fighting.”

    Integration back into society

    is a point on which the work-

    ing paper focuses. After

    children have been to war,

    they are changed by the im-

    ages that they have seen. The

    countries of China, Russia

    and Brazil would like to see

    Interim Care Centers made

    for children while they serve

    in the army to help children

    succeed in life after fighting.

    “We need to make sure that

    their literacy is good and that

    they get education and psy-

    chological help,” Russia’s

    representative said.

    Despite the committee’s

    frustration with children

    The Use Of Child Soldiers Perplexes Many in SOCHUM

    University of Michigan Model United Nations

    The Daily Planet Friday, January 12, 2007 Issue 2

    Dale Dorlin

    Human trafficking- the

    words on everyone’s lips-

    was the starting point for

    today’s session. The feeling

    in the room today was frus-

    tration as none of the dele-

    gates gave answers; they only

    voiced problems. Delegations

    expressed the need to address

    the prevention of prostitution

    and the prosecution of the

    convicted human traffickers.

    Yet within the debate there is

    no clear solution.

    A delegate of Djibouti,

    Ebony Wright, says, “You

    can’t stop the demand but

    you can stop the supply. By

    providing other opportunities

    for these people, they will be

    less vulnerable to being

    trapped in by traffic.” Dji-

    bouti feels that there should

    be enforcement on human

    trafficking laws and increased

    awareness and that weak

    statements are not valued in

    the discussion of this topic.

    The United States believes

    that the creation of an inter-

    national standard needs to be

    put in place. This standard

    must define human traffickers

    and victims. Without doing

    so, the UN cannot go about

    the process of rehabilitation

    and reform. The US also has

    a tier system, a way of rank-

    ing nations from the least to

    the most problematic. The

    US, would like to work with

    their Tier 3 nations, ranked

    lower than Tier 1 or Tier 2, to

    establish prevention, among

    these nations are Belize and

    Cuba.

    Currently the countries of

    Australia, United Kingdom and

    Argentina are forming a resolu-

    tion involving the prosecution of

    human traffickers and the men

    who are using children and

    women for human trafficking.

    Sophie Thomas, a delegate from

    Australia, says,”Everyone’s on

    board. I feel that it is a step to-

    wards fully and completely elimi-

    nating the problem of human

    trafficking.”

    On the flipside to the

    frustration of passive and negli-

    gent statements, everyone seems

    to be going with the flow. Ac-

    cording to Thailand’s representa-

    tive, Aaron Decker, the process is

    running smoothly. Decker says,

    “We’re working together and we

    hope that we can keep it this

    way.”

    Security Council Stalemate

    Zach Yancer

    A sharply divided Security Council spent the

    morning deliberating, unfortunately failing to either

    arrive at a consensus or advance the debate beyond

    Iranian nuclear capability. The existing sanctions

    imposed on Iran call for the Iranian government to

    provide a comprehensive report regarding the con-

    dition of their nuclear program within sixty days,

    twenty-one days have already passed.

    Although the Council was divided on many is-

    sues, the chief problem is that Iran has expressed

    verbally that it has no intentions of halting Uranium

    enrichment or dismantling any existing programs.

    Although the majority of the council favored to give

    Iran the benefit of the doubt, the delegates from

    Slovakia, United Kingdom, and the United States

    opted for a preemptive resolution in response to the

    Iranian delegate’s comments. Such a resolution

    would respond to Iranian noncompliance and would

    take effect at a prescribed date, shortly after the

    sixty day timetable expired.

    The Russian Federation and Ghana relentlessly

    countered a preemptive resolution, arguing that by

    taking action before the Council received the offi-

    cial report from Iran a preemptive resolution would

    undermine the credibility of the Council; further-

    more, this action would incite deeper Iranian isola-

    tion, forcing the nation to retreat from a return to

    diplomatic talks.

    Early on France attempted to table the issue of

    Iran and move onto the Darfur crisis; however, this

    was voted down and the deadlock continued.

    During the course of the meeting several written

    questions were relayed to the delegate from Iran.

    When asked whether it was true that Iran was slow-

    ing down its nuclear program the Iranian delegate

    responded, “Absolutely not, Iran has no intentions

    of halting its nuclear program.” Iran later added,

    “Iran would be open to direct talks with the United

    States,” further adding, “Iran will not be intimidated

    by sanctions, and that these sanctions only provoke

    a more hostile diplomatic course for Tehran.

    These comments gave many in the Council ap-

    parent proof that further sanctions, as requested by

    the UK and US, are a poor decision. However, the

    delegate from the United Kingdom did end discus-

    sion on the very relevant point that, as he stated,

    “No nation in the right state of mind would tell the

    Council that sanctions on themselves would resolve

    the problem.”

    Necessity: We Need Traffic Control

  • Page 2 Issue 2

    University of Michigan Model United Nations The Daily Planet

    “We Can’t Let One Nation Threaten the Entire World”

    Ratan Chana

    The Disarmament and

    International Security com-

    mittee has seen some vi-

    cious debate both yesterday

    evening and this morning on

    the topic of nuclear nonpro-

    liferation in the Middle East.

    Nations such as the United

    States and the United King-

    dom reiterated their commit-

    ment to making Iran cooper-

    ate fully with the IAEA. The

    United States feels that Iran

    is a threat to not only them,

    but to the entire interna-

    tional community.

    Furthermore, DISEC

    also debated why the inter-

    national community failed

    to prevent North Korea from

    gaining nuclear weapons

    and how to avoid those mis-

    I Can See Clearly Now… SpecPol Is in Session

    Dentistry of the World

    Moksha Atluri

    Talks in the WHO are progress-

    ing diligently on the subject of oral

    health. Various delegates have raised

    the concern of the deteriorating state

    of oral health in third-world countries.

    After recognizing the extent of this

    problem on an international scale,

    delegates then proceeded to discuss

    possible solutions to write in a future

    resolution. The delegate from the US

    presented the possibility of providing

    education on dental health care as

    well as the possibility of increasing

    available medication and research

    funds to increase the quality of such

    medications in underprivileged na-

    tions. During a caucus, multiple dele-

    gations suggested implementing a

    basic health care program for every

    willing country. However, others

    raised concerns about funding. The

    delegate from Slovakia, David Aron,

    has stated that “there are solutions

    being presented but there are cur-

    rently no plans for getting funds to

    implement these solutions.”

    One of the major problems dis-

    cussed in committee was the unhy-

    gienic state of water systems in third-

    world countries. Aishah Gulam, the

    delegate representing Cuba, stated

    that “not having a clean water system

    is the root of most health problems,

    including the problem of oral health.”

    Discussion then turned to the possi-

    bility of sanitizing water systems as

    the first step to rectify oral health

    problems internationally. Delegates

    suggested the possibility of supple-

    menting fluoride in unsanitary water,

    but this idea raised a stream of ques-

    tions from other countries concerned

    about the health implications of put-

    ting such a chemical in drinking wa-

    ter. If talks continue to progress and

    further solutions are presented, coun-

    tries may cooperatively present a

    working paper for the committee to

    Clara Yoon

    Transparency, or seeing

    a country’s actions clearly,

    is just one aspect of the

    landmine issue that the Spe-

    cial Political Committee’s

    delegates have been discuss-

    ing. The Speakers List con-

    tinues to grow as delegates

    rise to voice their opinion on

    transparency, incentives,

    and non-state actors in re-

    gards to landmines. The

    delegates have developed

    several working papers re-

    volving around the issue of

    landmines.

    One working paper fo-

    cuses on a gradual reduction

    of landmines. Transparency

    will not be forced but in-

    stead, national sovereignty

    will be respected. Russia

    delegate Peter Rabeda says

    found it very interesting that

    “Egypt is so focused on Is-

    rael’s nuclear program, when

    on September 11, 2001 they

    accused the Mossad of blow-

    ing up the world trade center.

    So anything they say or do on

    the matter must be viewed

    with extreme suspicion.”

    Several nations have also

    suggested incentives be of-

    fered to Iran in exchange for

    cooperation. Iran and its sup-

    porters have replied with

    ideas that include reforming

    the IAEA. The continuous

    vibrancy of the debate gives

    hope that the international

    community will find a solu-

    tion to this deadlock.

    takes again. “Iran is a des-

    potic regime that must be

    stopped,” stated the delegate

    from Israel as he went on

    acknowledging that, “the

    international community has

    never seen so great a threat

    to security since Hitler was

    in power.”

    The United Kingdom,

    United States, and Israel are

    actively sparring with the

    nations that support Iran,

    such as North Korea. The

    UK and Australia couldn’t

    help but note that Iran did

    sign the NPT, forcing it to

    comply with the UN Secu-

    rity Council’s resolution

    1737, which states that Iran

    must allow access to its nu-

    clear facilities.

    The Israeli delegate

    the intent of the working

    paper is “to aid countries

    and put in programs to

    strengthen the countries’

    economies to finance land

    mine removal.”

    Similarly, another

    working paper in develop-

    ment also deals with “an

    incentive program to give

    aid and money mostly to

    developing countries,” as

    described by Afghanistan

    delegate Amy Leder. Devel-

    oping countries may not

    necessarily have the re-

    sources to finance an effec-

    tive de-mining program, and

    thus, several of such devel-

    oping countries have asked

    for help from wealthier na-

    tions. This incentive plan

    will be, according to Leder,

    “contingent on transparency

    and effectiveness.”

    Another working paper

    also involves such an incen-

    tive program. According to

    Australian delegate Naufal

    Sanaullah, the working paper

    presents ideas regarding

    “landmine removal and pro-

    duction cessation through

    incentive programs…[and]

    funding.”

    Prevalent ideas in the

    discussion in SpecPol have

    also included dealings with

    non-state actors that have

    been using landmines. Dele-

    gates have brought forth

    ideas regarding this aspect of

    the issue, including the idea

    of instating peacekeeping

    forces. In addition, the dele-

    gates have discussed training

    armies to learn how to deal

    with or remove the mines.

  • Page 3 Issue 2

    University of Michigan Model United Nations The Daily Planet

    How to Save a Life

    Lauren Frisch

    The Human Rights Council is currently

    dealing with the issue of human trafficking.

    Many people subject to human trafficking are

    forced into slavery, prostitution, labor, viola-

    tion through torture, and even rape. Minors

    especially being exploited by those who feel

    that their higher authority gives them power to

    treat children as they choose.

    Achala Gopal, the human rights council’s

    delegate from Greece, feels that, “Prosecution,

    and not prevention, is a necessary step towards

    better standards in the treatment of humans.”

    Simply stopping human trafficking is a neces-

    sary step towards better international stan-

    dards regarding the treatment of people. How-

    ever, Greece and many of their ally countries

    feel that through a combination of prosecution

    and public education, not only will human

    trafficking be eliminated, but hopefully peo-

    ple’s mindsets towards the subject will change

    as well.

    Delegate Claire Madill from Argentina

    believes, “The number of countries concerned

    with human trafficking is great, but there is

    not enough action happening to actually pre-

    vent the issue.” Argentina believes that each

    country should, “Address education and reha-

    bilitation.”

    Multiple countries are drafting working

    papers to deal with the issue of human traf-

    ficking. At this point, it is unclear what the

    delegation will decide to do. The representa-

    tives may choose to sympathize with countries

    like Cape Verde who need human trafficking

    in order to maintain their economy, as was

    pointed out by Pierre Dowden, the commit-

    tee’s delegate from Slovakia. Another option

    would be to follow the views of the US, who

    feel that stricter international standards and

    rehabilitation methods are needed.

    Most of the delegates seem to be pushing

    towards either prevention of human traffick-

    ing, prosecution of those who practice it, or a

    combination of the two. Given the wide range

    of views concerning the subject, many coun-

    tries feel that time will pass before a resolution

    is actually reached.

    WHO Debates Oral Health

    Sonja Mertens

    The first topic the World Health Or-

    ganization is covering in UMMUN 2007

    is that of oral health, and especially how

    to improve oral health in developing na-

    tions.

    This debate has developed into pro-

    ducing two major ideas: improving the

    quality and accessibility of water, and

    increasing education on the fundamentals

    of good oral health. Once the quality and

    accessibility of water improve, the oral

    diseases spread through contaminated

    water will decrease significantly, and the

    benefits of clean water to oral health will

    be evident. Increasing education is an

    obvious way to improve the oral health of

    a population, but the mechanics of how to

    increase education are an issue. One very

    unique proposition, the ‘Bucky the Brush-

    ing Beaver’ program, has come forth.

    This is a concept to air-drop educational

    pamphlets, toothbrushes, water purifica-

    tion tablets, and dental floss into develop-

    ing nations. According to Sean O’Neil,

    representative of the Congo and one of

    the initiators of this idea, “Congo be-

    lieves that the ‘Bucky the Brushing

    Beaver’ program is excellent in edu-

    cating the youth in third-world coun-

    tries with high illiteracy.” Concepts

    like this one to improve education,

    when combined with ideas to improve

    the quality and accessibility of water,

    are the most effective way to improve

    oral health.

    Once the ideas are put together, the

    delegates must determine how the

    ideas being presented will be funded.

    When the delegates must examine the

    feasibility of their ideas, problems

    with organization and funding will

    follow. The real world application of

    the concepts presented, as well as the

    possible failure of their application,

    always leads to frustration, discussion,

    and conflict among delegates, which

    makes this conference interesting to

    everyone.

    Why You May Have Missed History

    Isaac Benton

    Last night brought a massive solar flare.

    As many carried on their usual night

    lives, the world was rocked by an incredi-

    ble solar flare, the likes of which have

    never before been observed. Between the

    hours of 8-11 PM local time our atmos-

    phere was bombarded with electromag-

    netic fallout from the raging nuclear ex-

    plosion on the sun.

    Like all solar flares, last night's

    was caused by a giant eruption in the so-

    lar corona. During a solar flare, a pocket

    of pent up magnetic energy in the sun's

    atmosphere creates a ball of superheated

    plasma. When this solar blister pops, the

    super-compressed plasma, heated to well

    over one-hundred million degree kelvin,

    rocket a barrage of electromagnetic ra-

    diation into space with the power of tens

    of millions of hundred megaton hydrogen

    bombs. Or at least, that was before last

    night's. Just like the gigantic sunspot

    which spawned this flare, its scale was

    nearly incomprehensible to scientists.

    Last night's activity replaced the previ-

    ous most powerful flare ever recorded

    which occurred on November 4, 2003.

    According to one key measure of a

    flare's strength, X-ray radiation on the

    GOES spacecraft, November fourth

    was classified as an X45. The distur-

    bance last night registered from early

    findings in the order of X60, that is 6

    million watts of energy per square

    meter! The most amazing part – as

    scientists continue to pore over the

    data that number is expected to in-

    crease. Whatever the scientific classi-

    fication turns out to reveal, nothing

    could be more impressive than the

    reported Aurora Borealis seen all over

    equatorial Central America and the

    Caribbean last night.

    Continued on Page 4

  • Page 4 Issue 2

    University of Michigan Model United Nations The Daily Planet

    Why You May Have Missed History Continued

    As graphic as this scenario

    sounds, solar flares are not

    uncommon. Far to the con-

    trary, in fact. Solar flares oc-

    cur regularly and without

    much notice, and usually pass

    without much attention simply

    because, unlike other natural

    disasters, their effects are

    somewhat more obscure. For

    example, given the strength of

    last nights storm, much of the

    world's populace remains com-

    pletely ignorant to its occur-

    rence. This is possible because

    the flood of electromagnetic

    radiation produced by the flare

    has no effect on sensation. So

    while effects on the human

    body are limited, effects on

    electronics and communication

    devices can be devastating.

    What might seem to someone a

    unexplainable dropped cellular

    call or a outage of satellite

    television service, was last

    night up to a near total com-

    munication signal loss on

    many parts of the globe. This

    flare, which once again, lasted

    for nearly two full hours,

    surely caused countless delays

    around the world. So far we

    know very little about the full

    impact of this massive solar

    storm, and many expect to still

    Motivation: the Ins and Outs of Diplomatic Affairs

    Gregory Smith

    A large segment of the work

    done by United Nations com-

    mittees year after year is the

    touch-and-go job of planning

    and executing the motivational

    strategies that will generate

    higher degrees of compliance

    with UN mandates. Every

    year brings a new variety of

    approaches from committees.

    By and large, dele-

    gates elect plans that select

    from four general conditioning

    rudiments: positive and nega-

    tive rewards and positive and

    negative punishment. For

    whatever reason, the UN has

    seen a tending toward policies

    that reward compliance in

    most General Assembly com-

    mittees, while Special commit-

    tees tend to enact punishment

    systems. It is always exciting

    to see if delegates will loosely

    conform to the status-quo or

    kick the habit and attempt a

    novel approach.

    This year, this issue

    may be especially salient due

    to the gradually changing

    world opinion on the UN's

    more aggressive options, nota-

    bly to what extent the role of

    be finding new folds of its

    effects well into the future.

    peacekeeping forces should be

    redefined. Many Delegates

    have only known a world where

    the Blue Berets have provided

    broad ranging support as Inter-

    national peacekeeping really

    flourished throughout the nine-

    ties. Perhaps this fact will

    cause committees to jump to

    military action more quickly,

    but maybe it will encourage

    deviation from the system

    which some delegates view to

    be overworked. This year we

    could see representatives to the

    UN Security Council, for in-

    stance, waive military interven-

    tion in favor of a plan which

    encourages nearly exclusively

    through economic incentive.

    Conversely, we might see

    SOCHUM, which usually dic-

    tates softer measures, pursue a

    robust peacekeeping plan.