35
University of Groningen Sports and amputation Bragaru, Mihail IMPORTANT NOTE: You are advised to consult the publisher's version (publisher's PDF) if you wish to cite from it. Please check the document version below. Document Version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Publication date: 2013 Link to publication in University of Groningen/UMCG research database Citation for published version (APA): Bragaru, M. (2013). Sports and amputation. s.n. Copyright Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons). Take-down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Downloaded from the University of Groningen/UMCG research database (Pure): http://www.rug.nl/research/portal. For technical reasons the number of authors shown on this cover page is limited to 10 maximum. Download date: 02-07-2021

University of Groningen Sports and amputation Bragaru, MihailM. Bragaru, R. Dekker, J.H.B. Geertzen & P.U. Dijkstra 16 Chapter 2 ABSTRACT Amputation of a limb may have a negative impact

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    0

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • University of Groningen

    Sports and amputationBragaru, Mihail

    IMPORTANT NOTE: You are advised to consult the publisher's version (publisher's PDF) if you wish to cite fromit. Please check the document version below.

    Document VersionPublisher's PDF, also known as Version of record

    Publication date:2013

    Link to publication in University of Groningen/UMCG research database

    Citation for published version (APA):Bragaru, M. (2013). Sports and amputation. s.n.

    CopyrightOther than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of theauthor(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons).

    Take-down policyIf you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediatelyand investigate your claim.

    Downloaded from the University of Groningen/UMCG research database (Pure): http://www.rug.nl/research/portal. For technical reasons thenumber of authors shown on this cover page is limited to 10 maximum.

    Download date: 02-07-2021

    https://research.rug.nl/en/publications/sports-and-amputation(d69a83a2-b117-42e8-acf9-34f83d395b58).html

  • Chapter 2

    Amputees and Sports: a Systematic Review

    Sports Medicine 2011, 41(9); 721-740 M. Bragaru, R. Dekker, J.H.B. Geertzen & P.U. Dijkstra

  • 16 Chapter 2

    ABSTRACT

    Amputation of a limb may have a negative impact on the psychological and physical well-being, mobility and social life of individuals with limb amputations. Participation in sports and/or regular physical activity has a positive effect on the above mentioned areas in able-bodied individuals. Data concerning participation in sports or regular physical activity together with its benefits and risks for individuals with limb amputations are scarce. No systematic review exists that addresses a wide range of outcomes such as biomechanics, cardiopulmonary function, psychology, sport participation and sport injuries. Therefore, the aim of this article is to systematically review the literature about individuals with limb amputations and sport participation. MEDLINE (PubMed), EMBASE, CINAHL® and SportDiscus® were searched without time or language restrictions using free text words and MeSH terms. The last search date was 31 March 2010. Books, internet sites and references of included papers were checked for papers relevant to the topic under review. Papers were included if the research topic concerned sports and a mini- mum of ten individuals with limb amputations were part of the study population. Papers were excluded if they included individuals with amputations of body parts other than upper or lower limbs or more distal than the wrist or ankle, or if they consisted of case reports, narrative reviews, books, notes or letters to the editor. Title, abstract and full-text assessments were performed by two independent observers following a list of preset criteria. Of the 3689 papers originally identified, 47 were included in the review. Most of the included studies were older than 10 years and had cross-sectional designs. Study participants were generally younger and often had more traumatic amputations than the general population of individuals with limb amputations. Heterogeneity in population characteristics, intervention types and main outcomes made data pooling impossible. In general, sports were associated with a beneficial effect on the cardiopulmonary system, psychological well-being, social reintegration and physical functioning. Younger individuals with unilateral trans-tibial amputations achieve better athletic performance and encounter fewer problems when participating in sports compared with older individuals with bilateral trans-femoral amputations. Regardless of their amputation level, individuals with limb amputations participate in a wide range of recreational activities. The majority of them were not aware of the sport facilities in their area and were not informed about available recreational activities. Sport prosthetic devices were used mostly

  • Amputees and sports: a systematic review 17

    by competitive athletes. For football, the injury rate and pattern of the players with an amputation were similar to those of able-bodied players. Individuals with limb amputations appear to benefit both physically and psychologically from participation in sports and/or regular physical activity. Therefore, sports should be included in rehabilitation programs, and individuals with limb amputations should be encouraged to pursue a physically active life following hospital discharge.

  • 18 Chapter 2

    INTRODUCTION

    Amputation of a limb may cause permanent disability and decreases mobility temporarily or permanently.[24] Individuals with limb amputations often see themselves as part of a special group that, according to able-bodied people, has special needs and requires additional attention.[25] These perceptions contribute to the relatively high depression and anxiety rates recorded amongst individuals with limb amputations, especially in the first two years after amputation.[26;43;44] Consequently, they will experience difficulties with social participation and in returning to everyday life.

    Individuals with limb amputations in general are in poor physical condition not only due to the amputation itself but also because of the illness preceding and leading to the amputation. In the United States, about 82% of all lower and upper limb amputations are due to vascular conditions, whereas 16% of amputations are due to trauma.[45] The remaining 2% of amputations are necessary due to cancer or inflammation or represent congenital birth defects. It has been predicted that the number of individuals with limb amputations will increase as a consequence of the population’s increasing age and increasing incidence of diabetes mellitus and cardiovascular diseases.[41]

    In general, participation in sports or physical activities is important in maintaining physical fitness.[5;17] Lack of physical exercise is the most important determinant of a deteriorating physical state, often leading to coronary heart disease.[46] Health organisations recommend 30 minutes or more of moderately vigorous daily physical activity.[47] Because of the amputation and the underlying diseases persisting after amputation, individuals with limb amputations tend to be less active than the able-bodied.[34] Participation in sports and an active lifestyle are assumed to be important for individuals with limb amputations as they enhance psychological well-being, self-confidence and coping behaviour.[48]

    Publications focusing on sports participation among individuals with limb amputations are generally characterised by a limited number of participants, anecdotal reports and diverse outcome variables.[49-53] Even though there are a number of reviews[48;54;55] concerning some aspects of the sport participation of individuals with limb amputations, none of them address both upper and lower limb amputations, nor do they offer a full picture of all important variables

  • Amputees and sports: a systematic review 19

    associated with sport participation, like participation rate, psychosocial modifications or injury rate. A complete overview may help professionals working in the sector of rehabilitation of individuals with limb amputations to evaluate sports or a physical training program as part of a treatment program for their patients and to better understand the benefits and risks of sports participation for this group. Therefore, the aim of this study was to systematically review the literature on participation in sports and/or physical activity among individuals with upper and/or lower limb amputations and to identify their biomechanical characteristics, cardiopulmonary function, psychological well-being, sport participation and physical functioning and injury characteristics.

    REVIEW METHODS

    For this systematic review, sports were defined as an activity involving physical exertion, with or without game or competition elements, with a minimal duration of half an hour and where skills and physical endurance are either required or to be improved.[39] Physical activity was defined as any bodily movement produced by skeletal muscles that require energy expenditure. [40]

    Four databases were searched: MEDLINE (PubMed), EMBASE, CINAHL® and SportDiscus®. The search strategy used consisted of a combination of database-specific Mesh terms, free text, “wild cards” (words truncated by using “*”) and Boolean operators (“AND”, “OR”, “NOT”). No time or language restrictions were applied. The search was structured in two parts. One part concerned papers related to amputations, while the second part concerned papers related to sports and physical activity. The two parts of the search were combined using the Boolean operator “AND”. The search details are presented in Appendix 1, Table A1. Sports were only searched as Mesh headings and as a general free text word, not by means of specific types of sports, like running, cycling or basketball. All retrieved papers were combined in a single database and duplicates were removed. The most recent search date was March 31, 2010.1

    1 Authors’ note: the literature search was updated on 21 February 2011. Following

    the same inclusion/exclusion criteria as described in section 1; The newly identified studies [31;35;90;91] were added to table 1 under the relevant characteristics analyses. The results of these studies did not influence the conclusion of this review and therefore they were not brought up for discussion.

  • 20 Chapter 2

    Papers were selected for this review in three stages after evaluation of the title, abstract and full text. Papers were included if the research topic was sports or physical activity and a minimum of ten individuals with limb amputations were part of the study population. Papers were excluded if they concerned minor amputation (distal to the wrist or ankle), amputation of body parts other than upper and lower limbs (e.g. ear, breast) or endoprostheses. In addition, case reports, narrative reviews, editorials, notes and letters to the editor were excluded. If, after title and abstract assessment, the paper’s inclusion or exclusion remained questionable, the paper was included in the next selection stage. References of papers selected for inclusion in the final assessment stage of the review were checked for relevant citations, which were later retrieved and assessed in the same way. Each assessment was performed by two independent observers. If the observers were not fluent in the language of the paper, a native speaker translated the paper into English with the two observers present. In case of assessor disagreement, a consensus meeting was held. If disagreement persisted, a third observer gave a binding verdict. The full text of a paper was assessed if the paper fulfilled the following inclusion criteria: a minimum of ten (1) individuals with limb amputations (2) were part of the study population and sport or physical activity was considered (3). Methodological quality was based on the assessment of the following criteria: reporting of inclusion (1) and exclusion (2) criteria; the numbers or percentages of males and females (3); age (4) [as mean and standard deviation or median and inter-quartile range]; cause of amputation (general description of cause [5] and exact number [6] per cause) and level (7); and side (8) of amputation.

    RESULTS

    A total of 3689 papers were identified, of which 895 were duplicates. After title and abstract assessment, 85 full-text papers were selected for further assessment. As a result of reference checking, 29 additional potentially relevant papers were identified. In total, 17 papers could not be retrieved for bibliographic reasons or because there was no complete paper available. After full text assessment, 50 papers were excluded because they did not fulfil the inclusion criteria, leaving 47 for final inclusion in this systematic review (figure 1). Inter-observer agreement, expressed as Cohen’s Kappa, for the full-text assessment of

  • Amputees and sports: a systematic review 21

    the 47 included papers was 0.83 (95% CI 0.78, 0.89). The quality of the included papers was moderate, with only four papers fulfilling all eight criteria. The frequency distribution of the methodological quality of all studies is presented in figure 2.

    In general, there was substantial heterogeneity in interventions, population characteristics and main outcomes between the studies. In order to provide structure to the findings, main outcomes were organized into five categories:

    • Biomechanical aspects and athletic performance: papers in this category had to present data regarding forces or any other biomechanical variables of the subjects or activity.

    • Cardiopulmonary function: papers in this category had to present biometric data recorded during or after physical activity or sports

    • Psychological aspects and quality of life: papers in this category had to present data regarding psychological aspects and quality of life.

    • Sports participation and physical functioning: papers in this category had to present data about sports participation and modifications in physical functioning following participation in sports or physical activities.

    • Sports injuries: papers in this category had to present data about sports injuries.

    Biomechanical Aspects and Athletic Performance

    Ten studies analysed the biomechanical aspects of swimming,[56] running[57-59] and long jump[60-65] and athletic performance of individuals with upper and lower limb amputations. Video cameras, force plates or Doppler devices were used to measure step length and rate, joint angles, ground reaction force and speed, among other variables. An overview of these papers is presented in Table 1. Young individuals with unilateral trans-tibial amputations who were provided with prostheses and were adequately trained were able to run.[57;58] Runners with lower limb amputations demonstrated a difference between the prosthetic and non-prosthetic limbs regarding step length and vertical, mediolateral and horizontal displacement of the centre of mass. The prosthetic and non-prosthetic limbs also differed in these variables from those of able-bodied individuals.[59;65]

  • 22 Chapter 2

    Long jumpers with trans-tibial amputations jumped further than those with trans-femoral amputations did.[60;64] Long jumpers with trans-tibial amputations who used their prosthetic limb for take-off had a shorter last step and a lower vertical velocity at touch-down than did those jumpers using their sound limb for take-off.[61] Runners with lower limb amputations[58;59] and swimmers with upper limb amputations[56] increase their speed by increasing their pace rather than their step or stroke length.

    Figure 1 Flow chart of the systematic review

  • Amputees and sports: a systematic review 23

    Cardiopulmonary Function

    Twelve studies analysed cardiopulmonary function in relation to sports or physical activity among individuals with limb amputations.[22;24;27;28;52;66-72] Training equipment such as an exercise cycle or rowing ergometer was used. An ECG, spirometer, sphygmomanometer, and Doppler device were used to measure maximal oxygen intake (VO2max), heart rate (HR), blood pressure (BP), anaerobic threshold (AT), and maximum power output (Wmax). An overview of these papers is presented in Table 1. The general physical condition of individuals with limb amputations is worse than the reference values for able-bodied people of similar age.[24;66] Nevertheless, individuals with limb amputations have better aerobic and anaerobic power outputs than do individuals with other locomotor disabilities.[70] Participation in sports or physical activity has beneficial influences on the cardiopulmonary system, muscle force and body mass of individuals with limb amputations.[27;28;52;69] The rehabilitation time of individuals with limb amputations was shorter when physical training was part of their rehabilitation program.[71]

    Figure 2 Methodological quality of identified papers

  • 24 Chapter 2

    Psychological Aspects and Quality of Life

    Six studies analysed the relationship between sport participation and the psychological aspects and quality of life of individuals with limb amputations.[23;29;30;32;73;74] Questionnaires or interviews were used to measure motivation to participate in sports, self-esteem and perceived benefits and barriers in physically active individuals with limb amputations. An overview of these papers is presented in Table 1. Quality of life and self-esteem of individuals with limb amputations who participated in sports and physical activities were higher than those of people with limb amputations who did not participate in these activities.[29;73] Sports and physical activity helped these individuals to increase their number of social contacts and their knowledge about sporting equipment that could facilitate their participation in sports. It also helped them to accept their disability and to improve their motor skills.[32;74] Participation in sports and/or physical activity decreased following the amputation as a direct result of physical constraints and accessibility issues.[74]

    Sport Participation and Physical Functioning

    Fifteen studies analysed associations between sport participation and/or physical activity and physical functioning of individuals with limb amputations.[33;36-38;75-85] A combination of self-developed and published questionnaires as well as specific tests addressing mobility outcomes were used as measurement tools. The main outcome variables were sport participation rate, the type of preferred physical activity, type and use of prosthesis and modifications of physical functioning following a physical training program. An overview of these papers is presented in Table 1. From the included papers, it appears that between 11% and 61% of individuals with lower limb amputations participate in sports and/or physical activities.[37;75] The choice of which sports to take part in was influenced by gender, the sport’s specific energy requirements and the load on the prosthetic limb.[80;85] Fishing, swimming, golfing, walking and cycling were favoured sports. Younger individuals with unilateral trans-tibial amputations due to non-vascular causes were more active than older individuals with bilateral trans-femoral amputations due to vascular causes.[38;79] A short but intensive physical training program improved walking distance and speed of individuals with traumatic lower limb amputations.

  • Amputees and sports: a systematic review 25

    Sports Injuries

    Four studies analysed the sports injuries suffered by individuals with limb amputations.[86-89] Questionnaires were used to assess the injury rate and injury-related phenomena such as pain or activity restriction. An overview of these papers is presented in Table 1. The injury pattern and rate among individuals with limb amputations who play football (soccer) appear to be the same as for able-bodied individuals. Sport-related muscle pain occurs more frequently in those with limb amputations than in individuals with other types of locomotor disabilities.[88] The emotional benefits of participating in sports outweighed the possible risk of injury.[86] The presence of pain did not influence perceived activity restrictions.[87]

  • 26 Chapter 2

    Auth

    ors

    (yea

    r)Q

    SS(

    n);

    Ic/E

    cGe

    nder

    M

    /W;

    Agea

    Ampu

    tatio

    n ch

    arac

    teris

    tics

    Stud

    y de

    sign

    Anal

    ysis

    aim

    Resu

    lts

    Leve

    lCa

    use

    (G/S

    )Si

    de

    Biom

    echa

    nica

    l Asp

    ects

    and

    Ath

    letic

    Per

    form

    ance

    Enok

    a et

    al.

    (198

    2) [5

    8]4

    10;

    N/N

    9/1;

    39

    10 T

    TN

    /N10

    Uni

    ; LL

    CSRu

    nnin

    g ga

    it ch

    arac

    -te

    ristic

    s60

    % o

    f you

    ng in

    divi

    dual

    s with

    Uni

    TT

    ampu

    tatio

    ns w

    ho

    used

    a p

    rost

    hesis

    wer

    e ab

    le to

    run

    at sp

    eeds

    rang

    ing

    from

    2.7

    to 8

    .2 m

    /s; S

    peed

    incr

    ease

    is re

    late

    d to

    an

    incr

    ease

    in st

    ride

    rate

    ; Ste

    p le

    ngth

    of t

    he P

    rosL

    is d

    irect

    ly

    rela

    ted

    to sp

    eed

    incr

    ease

    .

    Engs

    berg

    et

    al. (

    1993

    ) [57

    ]4

    21

    (221

    ); N

    /N

    17/4

    ; 11

    21 T

    TN

    /N21

    Uni

    ; LL

    CSRu

    nnin

    g ch

    arac

    teris

    tics

    of A

    B an

    d ch

    ildre

    n w

    ith

    TT a

    mpu

    tatio

    ns

    Non

    Pros

    L ge

    nera

    ted

    grea

    ter v

    ertic

    al, a

    nter

    opos

    terio

    r an

    d m

    edio

    late

    ral f

    orce

    s as c

    ompa

    red

    to P

    rosL

    of A

    B;W

    ith in

    crea

    sing

    spee

    d, th

    e N

    onPr

    osL

    gene

    rate

    d gr

    eate

    r fo

    rwar

    d pr

    opul

    sion

    than

    the

    Pros

    L.

    Gavr

    on e

    t al

    . (19

    95) [

    59]

    412

    ; N

    /N12

    /0; N

    12 T

    TN

    /N12

    Uni

    ; LL

    CSSp

    rintin

    g ch

    arac

    teris

    tics

    of in

    divi

    dual

    s with

    TT

    ampu

    tatio

    ns

    Pros

    L an

    d N

    onPr

    osL

    wer

    e as

    ymm

    etric

    with

    resp

    ect t

    o st

    ride

    leng

    th a

    nd ti

    me

    and

    verti

    cal d

    ispla

    cem

    ent o

    f ce

    ntre

    of m

    ass;

    Non

    Pros

    L st

    ride

    cont

    ribut

    ed m

    ore

    to

    horiz

    onta

    l disp

    lace

    men

    t tha

    n Pr

    osL

    strid

    e.

    Nol

    an e

    t al.

    (200

    0) [6

    0]4

    16;

    N/N

    16/0

    ; N8

    TT /

    8 TF

    N/N

    16 U

    ni;

    LLCS

    Take

    -off

    char

    acte

    ristic

    s du

    ring

    long

    jum

    ping

    Athl

    etes

    with

    TT

    ampu

    tatio

    ns ju

    mpe

    d fu

    rthe

    r, ha

    d a

    fast

    er a

    ppro

    ach

    spee

    d an

    d a

    low

    er c

    entr

    e of

    mas

    s com

    -pa

    red

    to a

    thle

    tes w

    ith T

    F am

    puta

    tions

    .

    Sim

    pson

    et

    al. (

    2001

    ) [65

    ]4

    23;

    N/N

    17/6

    ; (1

    8-36

    )20

    TT

    / 3

    TFN

    /N22

    Uni

    / 1B

    il; L

    LCS

    Loco

    mot

    or c

    hara

    cter

    is-tic

    s of l

    ong

    jum

    pPr

    osL

    of in

    divi

    dual

    s with

    TT

    ampu

    tatio

    ns h

    ad a

    gre

    ater

    st

    ep le

    ngth

    com

    pare

    d to

    thei

    r Non

    Pros

    L; M

    ore

    prox

    imal

    am

    puta

    tions

    gen

    erat

    ed la

    rger

    inte

    rlim

    b ki

    nem

    atic

    asym

    -m

    etry

    Indi

    vidu

    als w

    ith T

    F am

    puta

    tions

    incr

    ease

    d sp

    eed

    by in

    crea

    sing

    step

    leng

    th o

    f the

    ir N

    onPr

    osL;

    Indi

    vidu

    als

    with

    TT

    ampu

    tatio

    ns in

    crea

    sed

    spee

    d by

    incr

    easin

    g st

    ep

    leng

    th o

    f the

    ir Pr

    osL.

    Patr

    itti e

    t al.

    (200

    5) [6

    4]

    334

    ; N

    /N11

    /9; N

    20 T

    T /

    14 T

    FN

    /NN

    /LL

    CSAp

    proa

    ch v

    eloc

    ity o

    f lo

    ng ju

    mpe

    rsIn

    divi

    dual

    s with

    TT

    ampu

    tatio

    ns ra

    n fa

    ster

    and

    jum

    ped

    furt

    her t

    han

    indi

    vidu

    als w

    ith T

    F am

    puta

    tions

    MikeTypewritten TextTable 1. Studies analyzing characteristics of individuals with limb amputations

    MikeTypewritten Text

    MikeTypewritten Text

    MikeTypewritten Text

    MikeTypewritten Text

    MikeTypewritten Text

  • Amputees and sports: a systematic review 27

    Nol

    an e

    t al.

    (200

    5) [6

    1]3

    14;

    N/N

    14/0

    ; N7

    TT /

    7 TF

    N/N

    N/L

    LCS

    Influ

    ence

    of t

    ake-

    off le

    g du

    ring

    the

    long

    jum

    pAt

    hlet

    es w

    ith T

    T am

    puta

    tions

    who

    took

    off

    from

    thei

    r Pr

    osL

    wer

    e ab

    le to

    bett

    er c

    ontr

    ol th

    eir d

    ownw

    ard

    velo

    c-ity

    at t

    ouch

    -dow

    n an

    d ha

    d a

    shor

    ter l

    ast s

    trid

    e.

    Nol

    an e

    t al.

    (200

    6) [6

    2]4

    17;

    N/N

    0/17

    ; N9

    TT /

    8 TF

    N/N

    17 U

    ni

    / LL

    CSKi

    nem

    atic

    char

    acte

    r-isti

    cs o

    f wom

    en w

    ith

    TT a

    nd T

    F am

    puta

    tions

    du

    ring

    long

    jum

    p

    Appr

    oach

    vel

    ocity

    mor

    e st

    rong

    ly in

    fluen

    ced

    the

    jum

    ped

    dist

    ance

    of w

    omen

    with

    TT

    ampu

    tatio

    ns th

    an th

    at o

    f the

    w

    omen

    with

    TF

    ampu

    tatio

    ns; W

    omen

    with

    TF

    ampu

    ta-

    tions

    had

    a lo

    wer

    cen

    tre

    of m

    ass t

    han

    the

    ones

    with

    TT

    ampu

    tatio

    ns; W

    omen

    with

    TF

    ampu

    tatio

    ns h

    ad g

    reat

    er

    join

    t ang

    les (

    hip,

    kne

    e an

    d le

    g) o

    n al

    l jum

    p ph

    ases

    com

    -pa

    red

    to th

    e at

    hlet

    es w

    ith T

    T am

    puta

    tions

    .

    Nol

    an e

    t al.

    (200

    7) [6

    3]4

    13;

    N/N

    13/0

    ; N6

    TT /

    7 TF

    N/N

    13 U

    ni

    / LL

    CSKi

    nem

    atic

    and

    tem

    pora

    l ch

    arac

    teris

    tics o

    f lon

    g ju

    mp

    Athl

    etes

    with

    TF

    ampu

    tatio

    ns h

    ad sl

    ower

    hor

    izont

    al v

    e-lo

    city

    and

    shor

    ter s

    trid

    e le

    ngth

    on

    the

    seco

    nd to

    last

    and

    la

    st st

    rides

    com

    pare

    d to

    ath

    lete

    s with

    TT

    ampu

    tatio

    ns;

    Athl

    etes

    with

    TF

    ampu

    tatio

    ns lo

    wer

    ed th

    eir c

    entr

    e of

    m

    ass i

    n th

    e la

    st st

    ride

    mor

    e th

    an a

    thle

    tes w

    ith T

    T am

    pu-

    tatio

    ns; A

    thle

    tes w

    ith T

    F am

    puta

    tions

    had

    gre

    ater

    join

    t an

    gles

    (hip

    , kne

    e an

    d le

    g) o

    n al

    l jum

    p ph

    ases

    com

    pare

    d to

    ath

    lete

    s with

    TT

    ampu

    tatio

    ns.

    Osb

    orou

    gh

    et a

    l. (2

    009)

    [5

    6]

    413

    ; N

    /N3/

    10;

    16.9

    3.1)

    13 E

    DN

    / N

    13 U

    ni

    / UL

    CSSw

    imm

    ing

    char

    acte

    ris-

    tics o

    f ind

    ivid

    uals

    with

    U

    L am

    puta

    tions

    rela

    ted

    to th

    eir a

    nthr

    opom

    etric

    ch

    arac

    teris

    tics

    SF w

    as re

    late

    d to

    max

    imum

    swim

    min

    g sp

    eed

    (r=.

    72);

    SF

    was

    rela

    ted

    to b

    iacr

    omia

    l bre

    adth

    (r=.

    86),

    shou

    lder

    girt

    h (r

    =.64

    ) and

    upp

    er-a

    rm le

    ngth

    (r=.

    58).

    Osb

    orou

    gh

    et a

    l. (2

    010)

    [9

    0]

    613

    ; N

    /N3/

    10;

    16.9

    3.1)

    13 E

    DN

    onPV

    D / Y

    13 U

    ni

    / UL

    CSSw

    imm

    ing

    char

    acte

    ris-

    tics o

    f ind

    ivid

    uals

    with

    U

    L am

    puta

    tions

    rela

    ted

    to th

    eir i

    nter

    -arm

    coo

    r-di

    natio

    n

    Swim

    min

    g sp

    eed

    (r=.

    59) a

    nd S

    F (r

    =.66

    ) wer

    e re

    late

    d to

    th

    e co

    ordi

    natio

    n of

    the

    ampu

    tate

    d ar

    m.

    Card

    iopu

    lmon

    ary

    Func

    tion

    Tom

    asze

    -w

    ska

    et a

    l. (1

    965)

    b [5

    2]

    319

    ; N

    /N16

    /3; N

    6 TT

    / 11

    TF

    N /

    N17

    Uni

    / 2

    Bil;

    LLLo

    ngCh

    ange

    s of c

    ardi

    opul

    -m

    onar

    y an

    d m

    uscl

    e fo

    rce

    char

    acte

    ristic

    s aft

    er tr

    aini

    ng

    HR a

    nd B

    P de

    crea

    sed

    in th

    e m

    ajor

    ity o

    f ind

    ivid

    uals

    with

    lim

    b am

    puta

    tions

    afte

    r 2 w

    eeks

    of i

    ndoo

    r tra

    inin

    g; In

    spi-

    ratio

    n fr

    eque

    ncy

    and

    mus

    cle

    forc

    e of

    han

    d, sh

    ould

    er a

    nd

    back

    incr

    ease

    d in

    the

    maj

    ority

    of i

    ndiv

    idua

    ls w

    ith li

    mb

    ampu

    tatio

    ns in

    the

    seco

    nd d

    ay o

    f ski

    ing.

  • 28 Chapter 2

    van

    Alst

    e et

    al

    . (19

    85) [6

    6]7

    39;

    Y/N

    28/1

    1;

    6710

    TT

    / 13

    TF

    / 11

    KD

    PVD/

    Y35

    Uni

    / 4

    Bil;

    LLCS

    HR d

    urin

    g PA

    and

    the

    thre

    shol

    d of

    pro

    sthe

    tic

    ambu

    latio

    n

    Indi

    vidu

    als w

    ith li

    mb

    ampu

    tatio

    ns a

    chie

    ved

    80%

    of t

    he

    pred

    icte

    d HR

    max

    val

    ue fo

    r AB

    of sa

    me

    age;

    Wor

    k ca

    paci

    ty

    of 6

    0 w

    atts w

    as th

    e th

    resh

    old

    of p

    rost

    hetic

    am

    bula

    tion.

    Pite

    tti e

    t al.

    (198

    7) [2

    7]6

    10;

    Y/N

    N; 3

    94

    TT /

    3 TF

    Non

    PVD

    / Y8

    Uni

    / 2

    Bil;

    LLLo

    ngCh

    ange

    s of c

    ardi

    o-pu

    lmon

    ary

    and

    wor

    k ca

    paci

    ty c

    hara

    cter

    istics

    aft

    er a

    erob

    ic tr

    aini

    ng

    HR d

    urin

    g re

    st a

    nd e

    xerc

    ise d

    ecre

    ased

    ; HR

    durin

    g vo

    li-tio

    nal e

    xhau

    stion

    incr

    ease

    d; V

    O2m

    ax a

    nd W

    max

    incr

    ease

    d.

    Alar

    anta

    et

    al. (

    1988

    ) [67

    ]5

    10;

    N/N

    9/1;

    35

    (23-

    57)

    3 TT

    / 3

    TF, 4

    UL

    Non

    PVD

    / YN

    ; 6 L

    L /

    4 U

    LCS

    Suita

    bilit

    y of

    test

    s eva

    lu-

    ating

    skie

    rs’ p

    hysic

    al

    capa

    city

    Mos

    t tes

    ts w

    ere

    not s

    uita

    ble

    for s

    kier

    s with

    lim

    b am

    -pu

    tatio

    ns; R

    ecom

    men

    ded

    test

    s: ro

    win

    g er

    gom

    eter

    for

    indi

    vidu

    als w

    ith T

    F am

    puta

    tions

    ; “w

    alki

    ng w

    ith sti

    cks”

    c fo

    r ind

    ivid

    uals

    with

    TT

    ampu

    tatio

    ns a

    nd/o

    r ind

    ivid

    uals

    with

    Uni

    UL

    ampu

    tatio

    ns, t

    read

    mill

    runn

    ing

    for i

    ndiv

    idu-

    als w

    ith B

    il U

    L am

    puta

    tions

    .

    Chin

    et a

    l. (1

    997)

    [68]

    553

    ; Y/

    N40

    /13;

    42

    11 T

    T /

    37 T

    F / 5

    HD

    N/N

    53 U

    ni;

    LLCS

    Valid

    ity o

    f the

    one

    -leg

    cycl

    ing

    ergo

    met

    er te

    st

    in d

    eter

    min

    ing

    AT

    AT c

    orre

    late

    d (r

    =0.6

    6) w

    ith p

    redi

    cted

    VO

    2max

    ; One

    -leg

    cycl

    e er

    gom

    eter

    is v

    alid

    in A

    T de

    term

    inati

    on.

    Kurd

    y-ba

    ilo e

    t al.

    (1

    997)

    [69]

    578

    (9

    0);

    N/N

    78/0

    ; N34

    TT

    / 37

    TF

    Non

    PVD

    / Y61

    Uni

    / 1

    7 Bi

    l; LL

    Long

    Chan

    ges o

    f car

    diov

    ascu

    -la

    r cha

    ract

    eristi

    cs a

    nd

    body

    mas

    s afte

    r sw

    im-

    min

    g po

    ol e

    xerc

    ises

    BP d

    ecre

    ased

    as a

    resu

    lt of

    supp

    ress

    ing

    the

    influ

    ence

    of

    the

    sym

    path

    etic

    nerv

    ous s

    yste

    m; B

    ody

    mas

    s dec

    reas

    ed

    Hutz

    ler e

    t al

    (199

    8) [7

    0]4

    10

    (50)

    ; Y/

    N

    10/0

    ; 39

    (±9.

    2)d

    NN

    / N

    N /

    LLCS

    Diffe

    renc

    e in

    pow

    er

    outp

    uts b

    etw

    een

    indi

    vidu

    als w

    ith li

    mb

    ampu

    tatio

    ns a

    nd in

    di-

    vidu

    als w

    ith o

    ther

    type

    s of

    phy

    sical

    disa

    biliti

    es

    Indi

    vidu

    als w

    ith li

    mb

    ampu

    tatio

    ns h

    ad b

    etter

    aer

    obic

    an

    d an

    aero

    bic

    pow

    er o

    utpu

    ts a

    nd fa

    tigue

    indi

    ces t

    han

    indi

    vidu

    als w

    ith o

    ther

    type

    s of p

    hysic

    al d

    isabi

    lities

    .

    Chin

    et a

    l. (2

    001)

    [28]

    624

    ; Y/

    NN

    ; 41

    (±18

    .4)

    24 T

    FN

    onPV

    D / Y

    24 U

    ni

    / LL

    Long

    Chan

    ges i

    n ca

    rdio

    -pul

    -m

    onar

    y ch

    arac

    teris

    tics

    after

    end

    uran

    ce tr

    aini

    ng

    base

    d on

    AT

    VO2m

    ax in

    crea

    sed

    for t

    he e

    ndur

    ance

    gro

    up c

    ompa

    red

    to

    pre-

    trai

    ning

    and

    to a

    con

    trol

    gro

    up; A

    T in

    crea

    sed

    for

    the

    endu

    ranc

    e gr

    oup

    com

    pare

    d to

    pre

    -tra

    inin

    g an

    d to

    a

    cont

    rol g

    roup

    .

    MikeTypewritten Text

  • Amputees and sports: a systematic review 29

    Chin

    et a

    l. (2

    002)

    [24]

    7

    31

    (49)

    ; Y/

    N

    18/1

    3;

    26

    (±5.

    7)

    10 T

    T /

    20 T

    F / 1

    KD

    Non

    PVD

    / Y31

    Uni

    / L

    LLo

    ngCh

    ange

    s of c

    ardi

    o-pu

    lmon

    ary

    and

    phys

    ical

    fit

    ness

    afte

    r phy

    sical

    tr

    aini

    ng c

    ompa

    red

    to A

    B

    VO2m

    ax in

    crea

    sed

    to th

    e le

    vel o

    f AB;

    AT

    incr

    ease

    d to

    the

    leve

    l of A

    B; W

    max

    inc

    reas

    ed to

    the

    leve

    l of A

    B.

    Kobz

    ev e

    t al

    . (20

    02) [

    71]

    418

    ; N

    /N18

    /0;

    (19-

    44)

    NN

    onPV

    D / Y

    N /

    LLCS

    Influ

    ence

    of P

    A le

    vel o

    n BP

    , HR

    and

    reha

    bilit

    a-tio

    n tim

    e

    High

    er P

    A le

    vel w

    as a

    ssoc

    iate

    d w

    ith lo

    wer

    BP

    and

    HR;

    High

    er P

    A le

    vel w

    as a

    ssoc

    iate

    d w

    ith a

    shor

    ter r

    ehab

    ilita

    -tio

    n tim

    e.

    Huon

    ker e

    t al

    . (20

    03) [

    22]

    317

    (1

    25);

    Y/N

    N; 3

    4 (±

    11.5

    )17

    TT

    N /

    N17

    Uni

    / L

    LCS

    Vasc

    ular

    cha

    ract

    eristi

    cs

    of p

    hysic

    ally

    acti

    ve

    indi

    vidu

    als w

    ith li

    mb

    ampu

    tatio

    ns a

    nd A

    B

    Bloo

    d flo

    w a

    nd d

    iam

    eter

    of t

    he c

    omm

    on fe

    mor

    al a

    rter

    y of

    the

    Pros

    L w

    ere

    smal

    ler c

    ompa

    red

    to N

    onPr

    osL

    and

    to

    untr

    aine

    d AB

    .

    Chin

    et a

    l. (2

    006)

    [72]

    749

    ; Y/

    N34

    /15;

    67

    5.6)

    19 P

    VD,

    30 N

    on-

    PVD

    /Y

    49U

    ni

    / LL

    CSTo

    iden

    tify

    the

    thre

    shol

    d of

    pro

    sthe

    tic a

    mbu

    la-

    tion

    Exer

    cise

    inte

    nsity

    of ≥

    50%

    VO

    2max

    was

    the

    thre

    shol

    d of

    pr

    osth

    etic

    ambu

    latio

    n.

    Psyc

    holo

    gica

    l Asp

    ects

    and

    Qua

    lity

    of L

    ife

    Valli

    ant e

    t al

    . (19

    85) [

    29]

    133

    (1

    61);

    N/N

    19 /

    14; N

    NN

    / N

    NCS

    Rela

    tions

    hip

    betw

    een

    self-

    este

    em, l

    ocus

    of

    cont

    role

    and

    PA

    of

    indi

    vidu

    als w

    ith li

    mb

    ampu

    tatio

    ns

    Phys

    ical

    ly a

    ctive

    indi

    vidu

    als w

    ith li

    mb

    ampu

    tatio

    ns h

    ad

    high

    er se

    lf-es

    teem

    than

    inac

    tive

    indi

    vidu

    als;

    Activ

    e m

    en

    with

    lim

    b am

    puta

    tions

    had

    a lo

    wer

    locu

    s of c

    ontr

    ol th

    an

    inac

    tive

    men

    ; Acti

    ve w

    omen

    with

    lim

    b am

    puta

    tions

    had

    a

    high

    er lo

    cus o

    f con

    trol

    than

    inac

    tive

    wom

    en.

    Mas

    tro

    et

    al. (

    1996

    ) [23]

    322

    (1

    38);

    Y/N

    17 /

    5;

    29N

    N /

    NN

    CSAt

    hlet

    es’ a

    ttitu

    des

    tow

    ards

    eac

    h ot

    her a

    nd

    thei

    r ran

    king

    of d

    isabi

    l-ity

    pre

    fere

    nces

    Indi

    vidu

    als w

    ith li

    mb

    ampu

    tatio

    ns w

    ere

    rank

    ed h

    ighe

    st

    in th

    e hi

    erar

    chy

    of p

    refe

    renc

    es d

    ue to

    the

    low

    est p

    er-

    ceiv

    ed d

    isabi

    lity.

    Wett

    erha

    hn

    et a

    l. (2

    002)

    [3

    0]

    656

    ; Y/

    N36

    / 20

    ; N34

    TT/

    22

    TF8

    PVD

    48

    Non

    PVD

    / Y

    48 U

    ni /

    8Bil

    /LL

    CSRe

    latio

    nshi

    p be

    twee

    n PA

    and

    bod

    y im

    age

    MBS

    RQ a

    nd A

    BIS

    scor

    es w

    ere

    signi

    fican

    tly h

    ighe

    r (p

    =0.0

    001

    resp

    ectiv

    ely

    p=0.

    01) f

    or a

    ctive

    indi

    vidu

    als

    with

    lim

    b am

    puta

    tions

    com

    pare

    d to

    an

    inac

    tive

    grou

    p; A

    re

    latio

    nshi

    p ex

    ists b

    etw

    een

    PA le

    vel a

    nd b

    ody

    imag

    e of

    in

    divi

    dual

    s with

    lim

    b am

    puta

    tions

    ; No

    data

    pre

    sent

    ed to

    su

    bsta

    ntiat

    e th

    e na

    ture

    of t

    he re

    latio

    nshi

    p be

    twee

    n PA

    le

    vel a

    nd b

    ody

    imag

    e; A

    chr

    onic

    illn

    ess d

    id n

    ot in

    fluen

    ce

    body

    imag

    e in

    the

    activ

    e gr

    oup.

  • 30 Chapter 2

    Low

    ther

    et

    al. (

    2002

    ) [73

    ]2

    15;

    Y/N

    15/0

    ; (1

    9-28

    )N

    N/N

    NCS

    Rela

    tions

    hip

    betw

    een

    athl

    etic

    perf

    orm

    ance

    , se

    lf-effi

    cacy

    and

    psy

    cho-

    logi

    cal s

    kills

    High

    self-

    effica

    cy w

    as a

    ssoc

    iate

    d w

    ith su

    cces

    sful

    ath

    letic

    pe

    rfor

    man

    ce; T

    he u

    sage

    of a

    ctiva

    tionf

    and

    rela

    xatio

    n sk

    ills w

    as a

    ssoc

    iate

    d w

    ith h

    igh

    self-

    effica

    cy a

    nd su

    cces

    s-fu

    l ath

    letic

    per

    form

    ance

    .

    Spor

    ner e

    t al

    . (20

    09) [

    32]

    157

    (1

    32);

    Y/N

    115

    / 17

    g;

    47.4

    g (±

    13.4

    )

    NN

    /NN

    CSRe

    latio

    nshi

    p be

    twee

    n pa

    rtici

    patio

    n in

    org

    an-

    ised

    spor

    t eve

    nts a

    nd

    psyc

    hoso

    cial

    cha

    rac-

    teris

    tics

    Parti

    cipa

    tion

    in o

    rgan

    ised

    spor

    ting

    even

    ts in

    crea

    sed

    the

    know

    ledg

    e of

    spor

    ting

    equi

    pmen

    t (92

    %),

    mob

    ility

    skill

    s (8

    4%) a

    nd d

    isabi

    lity

    acce

    ptan

    ce (8

    4%);

    98%

    felt

    that

    pa

    rtici

    patio

    n in

    org

    anise

    d sp

    ortin

    g ev

    ents

    impr

    oved

    thei

    r liv

    es; I

    ncre

    ased

    num

    bers

    of f

    riend

    s, in

    tera

    ction

    with

    ot

    her d

    isabl

    ed p

    eopl

    e an

    d ab

    ility

    to b

    e co

    mpe

    titive

    wer

    e se

    en a

    s ben

    efits

    of p

    artic

    ipati

    on in

    org

    anise

    d sp

    ortin

    g ev

    ents

    ; Par

    ticip

    ants

    in o

    rgan

    ised

    spor

    ting

    even

    ts h

    ad

    decr

    ease

    d co

    gniti

    ve a

    nd p

    hysic

    al li

    mita

    tions

    (CHA

    RT)

    com

    pare

    d to

    non

    -par

    ticip

    ants

    ; For

    63%

    of t

    he p

    artic

    i-pa

    nts,

    taki

    ng p

    art i

    n or

    gani

    sed

    spor

    t eve

    nts r

    epre

    sent

    s th

    eir o

    nly

    spor

    ting

    activ

    ity.

    Cout

    ure

    et

    al. (

    2010

    ) [74

    ]7

    15;

    Y/N

    8/7;

    65

    .1

    (±13

    .9)

    11 T

    T /

    4 TF

    PVD/

    Y15

    Uni

    / L

    LLo

    ngCh

    arac

    teris

    tics o

    f le

    isure

    acti

    vitie

    s of

    indi

    vidu

    als w

    ith L

    L am

    puta

    tions

    Parti

    cipa

    tion

    in le

    isure

    acti

    vitie

    s dec

    reas

    ed fo

    llow

    ing

    ampu

    tatio

    n; L

    eisu

    re sa

    tisfa

    ction

    of i

    ndiv

    idua

    ls w

    ith L

    L am

    puta

    tions

    was

    hig

    her t

    han

    ILP

    refe

    renc

    e va

    lue;

    Indi

    -vi

    dual

    s with

    LL

    ampu

    tatio

    ns e

    ncou

    nter

    mor

    e co

    nstr

    aint

    s th

    an A

    B in

    term

    s of f

    uncti

    onal

    abi

    lities

    and

    acc

    essib

    ility

    w

    hen

    enga

    ging

    in le

    isure

    acti

    vitie

    s.

    Tata

    r Y.

    (201

    0) [3

    1]6

    37;

    Y/N

    25/1

    2; N

    18 T

    T /

    19 T

    F4

    PVD

    /Y37

    Uni

    CSRe

    latio

    nshi

    p be

    twee

    n pa

    rtici

    patio

    n in

    spor

    ts

    and

    body

    imag

    e of

    am

    pute

    es

    Parti

    cipa

    tion

    in sp

    orts

    incr

    ease

    s per

    ceiv

    ed b

    ody

    imag

    e of

    am

    pute

    es.

    Spor

    t Par

    ticip

    ation

    and

    Phy

    sical

    Fun

    ction

    ing

    Kege

    l et a

    l. (1

    977)

    h,i

    [75]

    613

    4;

    Y/N

    103/

    31;

    4787

    TT

    / 27

    TF

    65 P

    VD,

    69 N

    on-

    PVD

    /Y

    114

    Uni

    / 2

    0Bil

    / LL

    CSLe

    vel o

    f spo

    rt p

    artic

    ipa-

    tion,

    pre

    ferr

    ed sp

    orts

    an

    d pr

    osth

    etic

    use

    61%

    wer

    e ac

    tive

    in sp

    orts

    Fish

    ing

    and

    swim

    min

    g w

    ere

    mos

    t fre

    quen

    tly p

    erfo

    rmed

    6%

    use

    d sp

    ort p

    rost

    hese

    s

  • Amputees and sports: a systematic review 31

    Kege

    l et a

    l (1

    978)

    h,i [

    76]

    613

    4;

    Y/N

    103/

    31;

    4781

    TT

    / 3

    KD /

    19 T

    F / 5

    HD

    65 P

    VD,

    69 N

    on-

    PVD

    /Y

    114

    Uni

    / 2

    0Bil

    / LL

    CSFu

    nctio

    nal c

    apab

    ilitie

    s an

    d po

    pula

    tion

    char

    -ac

    teris

    tics o

    f acti

    ve

    indi

    vidu

    als w

    ith li

    mb

    ampu

    tatio

    ns

    Youn

    ger i

    ndiv

    idua

    ls w

    ith T

    T am

    puta

    tions

    wer

    e m

    ore

    ac-

    tive

    than

    old

    er in

    divi

    dual

    s with

    TF

    ampu

    tatio

    ns

    Kege

    l et a

    l. (1

    980)

    i [38

    ]6

    100;

    Y/

    N85

    /15;

    45

    58 T

    T /

    25 T

    F29

    PVD

    , 71

    Non

    -PV

    D / Y

    83 U

    ni

    / 17

    Bil

    / LL

    CSCh

    arac

    teris

    tics o

    f spo

    rt

    parti

    cipa

    tion:

    leve

    l, ba

    r-rie

    rs, p

    rost

    hesis

    use

    and

    co

    mpl

    aint

    s

    Youn

    ger i

    ndiv

    idua

    ls w

    ith tr

    aum

    atic

    limb

    ampu

    tatio

    ns

    wer

    e m

    ore

    activ

    e th

    an o

    lder

    indi

    vidu

    als w

    ith v

    ascu

    lar

    limb

    ampu

    tatio

    ns B

    arrie

    rs to

    spor

    ts p

    artic

    ipati

    on: p

    ain,

    em

    barr

    assm

    ent,

    lack

    of s

    peci

    al o

    rgan

    ised

    prog

    ram

    s for

    in

    divi

    dual

    s with

    lim

    b am

    puta

    tions

    , lac

    k of

    aw

    aren

    ess

    of th

    e ex

    isting

    spor

    t fac

    ilitie

    s (93

    %) P

    rost

    hetis

    ts d

    id n

    ot

    wan

    t to

    mod

    ify th

    e pr

    osth

    esis

    acco

    rdin

    g to

    the

    sugg

    es-

    tions

    of i

    ndiv

    idua

    ls w

    ith li

    mb

    ampu

    tatio

    ns in

    45%

    of

    case

    s

    Med

    hat e

    t al

    . (19

    90) [

    77]

    413

    1;

    Y/N

    122/

    9;

    58 (2

    4-90

    )

    82 T

    T/61

    TF

    47 P

    VD,

    84 N

    on-

    PVD

    /Y

    N/L

    LCS

    Fact

    ors i

    nflue

    ncin

    g AD

    L an

    d sp

    ort p

    artic

    ipati

    onIn

    divi

    dual

    s with

    TF

    ampu

    tatio

    ns re

    port

    ed m

    ore

    prob

    -le

    ms i

    n AD

    L th

    an d

    id in

    divi

    dual

    s with

    TT

    ampu

    tatio

    ns

    Spor

    t par

    ticip

    ation

    was

    pro

    blem

    atic

    for i

    ndiv

    idua

    ls w

    ith

    both

    TT

    and

    TF a

    mpu

    tatio

    ns; L

    east

    pro

    blem

    atic

    spor

    ts:

    cano

    eing

    and

    swim

    min

    g

    Pohj

    olai

    nen

    et a

    l. (1

    990)

    [7

    8]

    717

    5;

    Y/N

    127/

    48;

    62

    (±15

    .8)

    93 T

    T/62

    TF

    142

    PVD,

    33

    Non

    -PV

    D / Y

    155

    Uni

    / 2

    0Bil

    / LL

    CSCh

    arac

    teris

    tics o

    f pr

    osth

    etic

    use,

    wal

    king

    ab

    ility

    and

    fact

    ors i

    nflu-

    enci

    ng w

    alki

    ng

    60%

    use

    d th

    eir p

    rost

    hesis

    >12

    hou

    rs/d

    ay 1

    5% c

    ould

    wal

    k 2-

    3 hr

    s and

    23%

    cou

    ld w

    alk

    mor

    e th

    an 1

    km

    Isch

    emic

    pa

    in re

    stric

    ted

    wal

    king

    Gaile

    y R

    . (1

    992)

    [82]

    512

    14;

    Y/N

    Nj;

    Nj

    Nj

    242

    PVD,

    97

    2 N

    on-

    PVD

    / Y

    Nj

    CSCh

    arac

    teris

    tics o

    f re

    crea

    tiona

    l acti

    vitie

    s:

    type

    , ret

    urn

    to, a

    mou

    nt

    and

    barr

    iers

    Nj

    Burg

    er e

    t al.

    (199

    7) [7

    9]7

    228;

    Y/

    N19

    1/37

    ; 53

    .3

    (±15

    .4)

    114

    TT

    /2 K

    D /

    108

    TF /

    4 HD

    Non

    PVD

    / Y22

    8 U

    ni

    / LL

    CSCh

    ange

    s in

    spor

    ts p

    ar-

    ticip

    ation

    and

    pre

    ferr

    ed

    recr

    eatio

    nal a

    ctivi

    ties

    follo

    win

    g am

    puta

    tion

    Spor

    t par

    ticip

    ation

    dec

    reas

    ed P

    refe

    rred

    recr

    eatio

    nal

    activ

    ities

    cha

    nged

    tow

    ards

    "mor

    e en

    ergy

    effi

    cien

    t" o

    nes

  • 32 Chapter 2

    Burg

    er e

    t al.

    (199

    7) [3

    6]7

    223;

    Y/

    N18

    7/36

    ; 54

    15.4

    )

    115

    TT /

    102

    TF /

    2 KD

    / 4

    HD

    Non

    PVD

    / Y20

    3 U

    ni

    / 20

    Bil

    / LL

    CSIn

    fluen

    ces o

    f age

    , am

    puta

    tion

    leve

    l and

    tim

    e sin

    ce a

    mpu

    tatio

    n on

    wal

    king

    , cyc

    ling

    and

    inde

    pend

    ence

    leve

    l

    Youn

    ger i

    ndiv

    idua

    ls w

    ith T

    T am

    puta

    tions

    wal

    ked

    long

    er

    and

    wer

    e m

    ore

    likel

    y to

    cyc

    le th

    an o

    lder

    indi

    vidu

    als w

    ith

    TF a

    mpu

    tatio

    ns A

    shor

    ter ti

    me

    since

    am

    puta

    tion

    lead

    to

    a hi

    gher

    inde

    pend

    ence

    leve

    l

    Legr

    o et

    al.

    (200

    1) [8

    0]3

    92;

    Y/N

    79/1

    3;

    54.9

    5 (±

    13.7

    )

    58 T

    TN

    /NN

    /LL

    CSPr

    efer

    red

    recr

    eatio

    nal

    activ

    ities

    and

    fact

    ors

    influ

    enci

    ng th

    e ch

    oice

    of

    acti

    vitie

    s.

    Fish

    ing

    was

    the

    mos

    t fre

    quen

    tly p

    refe

    rred

    recr

    eatio

    nal

    activ

    ity (n

    =15)

    Gen

    der,

    requ

    ired

    ener

    gy le

    vel,

    Pros

    L im

    pact

    load

    and

    age

    influ

    ence

    d ch

    oice

    of r

    ecre

    ation

    al

    activ

    ity

    Rau

    et a

    l. (2

    007)

    [33]

    858

    ; Y/Y

    58/0

    ; 37

    (±10

    .9)

    43 T

    T/15

    TF

    Non

    PVD

    / Y58

    Uni

    / L

    LRC

    TCh

    ange

    s of w

    alki

    ng

    char

    acte

    ristic

    s afte

    r sh

    ort i

    nten

    sive

    phys

    i-ot

    hera

    py fo

    r ind

    ivid

    uals

    with

    lim

    b am

    puta

    tions

    co

    mpa

    red

    to c

    ontr

    ols

    Trai

    ning

    pro

    gram

    was

    effe

    ctive

    in in

    crea

    sing

    wal

    king

    di

    stan

    ce a

    nd sp

    eed,

    Pro

    sL m

    axim

    al lo

    ad a

    nd P

    CI

    Yazic

    iogl

    u et

    al.

    (200

    7)

    [81]

    824

    ; Y/Y

    24/0

    ; 28

    (±4.

    6)24

    TT

    Non

    PVD

    / Y24

    Uni

    / L

    LCS

    Diffe

    renc

    es in

    phy

    siolo

    g-ic

    al a

    nd Q

    oL c

    hara

    cter

    -isti

    cs o

    f soc

    cer p

    laye

    rs

    com

    pare

    d to

    con

    trol

    s

    A di

    ffere

    nce

    in p

    hysio

    logi

    cal c

    hara

    cter

    istics

    was

    re-

    cord

    ed, f

    avou

    ring

    play

    ers Q

    oL im

    prov

    ed fo

    r pla

    yers

    with

    re

    gard

    s to

    pain

    , em

    otion

    al ro

    le a

    nd fe

    ar o

    f fal

    ling

    Yari

    et a

    l. (2

    008)

    [83]

    846

    ; Y/Y

    21/2

    5;

    55.8

    12.1

    )

    31

    HD/1

    5 HP

    6 PV

    D, 4

    0 N

    onPV

    D / Y

    46 U

    ni

    / LL

    CSAc

    tivity

    leve

    l and

    m

    obili

    ty li

    mita

    tions

    of

    indi

    vidu

    als w

    ith H

    D an

    d HP

    am

    puta

    tions

    39%

    par

    ticip

    ated

    in sp

    orts

    Sw

    imm

    ing,

    fitn

    ess,

    saili

    ng a

    nd

    golf

    wer

    e th

    e m

    ost p

    racti

    ced

    spor

    ts

    Wal

    ker e

    t al

    . (20

    09) [

    84]

    736

    (62)

    ; Y/

    Y21

    /15;

    32

    .5k

    36 T

    TkN

    onPV

    D / Y

    36 U

    ni

    / LL

    CSDi

    ffere

    nce

    in o

    utco

    me

    follo

    win

    g fib

    ular

    leng

    th-

    enin

    g or

    am

    puta

    tion

    No

    diffe

    renc

    e in

    spor

    t par

    ticip

    ation

    bet

    wee

    n fib

    ular

    le

    ngth

    enin

    g pa

    tient

    s and

    pati

    ents

    with

    am

    puta

    tion

    No

    diffe

    renc

    e in

    spor

    ts a

    ctivi

    ty b

    etw

    een

    fibul

    ar le

    ngth

    enin

    g pa

    tient

    s, p

    atien

    ts w

    ith a

    mpu

    tatio

    n an

    d co

    ntro

    l gro

    up.

    Patie

    nts w

    ith a

    mpu

    tatio

    ns sc

    ored

    sign

    ifica

    ntly

    bett

    er

    than

    fibu

    lar l

    engt

    heni

    ng p

    atien

    ts o

    n th

    e jo

    b sa

    tisfie

    rs

    cont

    ent s

    cale

  • Amputees and sports: a systematic review 33

    Karm

    arka

    r et

    al.

    (200

    9)

    [85]

    742

    ; Y/Y

    N; 4

    2.11

    16)

    1 AD

    / 20

    TT

    / 3

    KD /

    14 T

    F / 4

    HD

    13 P

    VD,

    27 N

    on-

    PVD

    / Y

    28 U

    ni

    / 10

    Bil

    / 8 U

    L /

    34 L

    L

    CSPe

    rson

    al c

    hara

    cter

    -isti

    cs a

    nd fu

    nctio

    nal

    perf

    orm

    ance

    rela

    ted

    to

    mob

    ility

    dev

    ice

    in p

    hysi-

    cal a

    ctive

    vet

    eran

    s

    Ampu

    tatio

    n le

    vel a

    nd d

    egre

    e of

    diffi

    culty

    of t

    he in

    tend

    ed

    activ

    ity w

    ere

    rela

    ted

    to p

    artic

    ipati

    on in

    spor

    ts P

    rost

    hetic

    us

    ers w

    ith a

    mor

    e pr

    oxim

    al a

    mpu

    tatio

    n ha

    d m

    ore

    prob

    lem

    s par

    ticip

    ating

    in sp

    orts

    com

    pare

    d to

    whe

    elch

    air

    user

    s of s

    ame

    ampu

    tatio

    n le

    vel.

    Kars

    et a

    l. (2

    009)

    [37]

    810

    5;

    Y/Y

    71/3

    1;

    58.7

    1 AD

    / 58

    TT

    / 13

    KD

    / 27

    TF

    / 5

    HD /

    1 HP

    42 P

    VD,

    63 N

    on-

    PVD

    / Y

    101

    Uni

    / 4

    Bil

    / LL

    CSPa

    rtici

    patio

    n in

    spor

    ts

    of in

    divi

    dual

    s with

    LL

    ampu

    tatio

    ns

    32%

    par

    ticip

    ated

    in sp

    orts

    Par

    ticip

    ation

    in sp

    orts

    bef

    ore

    the

    ampu

    tatio

    n w

    as re

    late

    d to

    par

    ticip

    ation

    in sp

    orts

    fo

    llow

    ing

    the

    ampu

    tatio

    n Sw

    imm

    ing,

    fitn

    ess a

    nd c

    yclin

    g w

    ere

    the

    mos

    t pra

    ctice

    d sp

    orts

    42%

    com

    plai

    ned

    abou

    t th

    eir p

    rost

    hesis

    or s

    port

    org

    anisa

    tion,

    and

    80%

    of t

    hem

    fo

    und

    this

    prob

    lem

    hin

    derin

    g th

    eir p

    artic

    ipati

    on in

    spor

    ts

    van

    den

    Berg

    -Em

    ons

    et a

    l. (2

    010)

    [3

    5]

    818

    (4

    61);

    Y/Y

    17/1

    ; 56

    (±13

    .13)

    18 T

    T9

    PVD,

    9

    Non

    PVD

    / Y

    18U

    ni

    / LL

    CSAc

    tivity

    leve

    l of i

    ndi-

    vidu

    als L

    L am

    puta

    tions

    Indi

    vidu

    als w

    ith T

    T am

    puta

    tions

    are

    40%

    less

    acti

    ve th

    an

    AB R

    ehab

    ilita

    tion

    phys

    icia

    ns si

    gnifi

    cant

    ly o

    vere

    stim

    ate

    the

    activ

    ity le

    vels

    of in

    divi

    dual

    s with

    lim

    b am

    puta

    tions

    Bekk

    erin

    g et

    al.

    (201

    1)

    [91]

    743

    (8

    2);

    Y/N

    22/2

    1;

    16.1

    4.4)

    4 TT

    / 11

    KD

    / 12

    TF

    / 16

    RP

    43 N

    on-

    PVD

    / Y43

    Uni

    / L

    LCS

    Diffe

    renc

    e in

    phy

    sical

    ac

    tivity

    bet

    wee

    n yo

    ung

    adul

    ts u

    nder

    goin

    g lim

    b-sa

    lvag

    e or

    abl

    ative

    su

    rger

    y

    No

    diffe

    renc

    e in

    phy

    sical

    acti

    vity

    leve

    l bet

    wee

    n yo

    ung

    adul

    ts w

    ho u

    nder

    wen

    t lim

    b-sa

    lvag

    e in

    terv

    entio

    ns a

    nd

    the

    ones

    who

    und

    erw

    ent a

    blati

    ve su

    rger

    y.

    Spor

    ts In

    jurie

    s

    Kege

    l et a

    l (1

    994)

    [86]

    375

    ; Y/

    N72

    /3; 2

    9 (1

    8-44

    )N

    17

    PVD,

    58

    Non

    -PV

    D / N

    N; 6

    1LL

    / 14U

    LCS

    Inju

    ry c

    hara

    cter

    istics

    of

    ampu

    tee

    socc

    er p

    laye

    rsPh

    ysic

    al in

    jurie

    s app

    eare

    d m

    inor

    com

    pare

    d w

    ith e

    mo-

    tiona

    l ben

    efits

    indu

    ced

    by sp

    ort 5

    2% o

    f ind

    ivid

    uals

    with

    lim

    b am

    puta

    tions

    nev

    er su

    stai

    ned

    an in

    jury

    whi

    le p

    layi

    ng

    socc

    er T

    he in

    jury

    patt

    ern

    of in

    divi

    dual

    s with

    lim

    b am

    pu-

    tatio

    ns w

    as si

    mila

    r to

    AB

    Mel

    zer e

    t al

    . (2

    001)

    [8

    9]

    732

    (5

    6);

    Y/N

    32/0

    ; 42

    .4N

    Non

    PVD

    / Y32

    Uni

    ; LL

    CSCo

    ntra

    late

    ral k

    nee

    os-

    teoa

    rthr

    itis p

    reva

    lenc

    e in

    indi

    vidu

    als w

    ith li

    mb

    ampu

    tatio

    ns w

    ho p

    lay

    or d

    o no

    t pla

    y vo

    lleyb

    all

    Cont

    rala

    tera

    l kne

    e os

    teoa

    rthr

    itis w

    as si

    gnifi

    cant

    ly m

    ore

    com

    mon

    am

    ong

    indi

    vidu

    als w

    ith li

    mb

    ampu

    tatio

    ns c

    om-

    pare

    d to

    con

    trol

    s (p<

    0.05

    ) No

    diffe

    renc

    e in

    the

    prev

    a-le

    nce

    of c

    ontr

    alat

    eral

    kne

    e os

    teoa

    rthr

    itis w

    as o

    bser

    ved

    betw

    een

    indi

    vidu

    als w

    ith li

    mb

    ampu

    tatio

    ns w

    ho p

    laye

    d vo

    lleyb

    all a

    nd th

    e on

    es w

    ho d

    id n

    ot p

    layl

  • 34 Chapter 2

    Ber

    nard

    i et

    al.

    (200

    3)

    [88]

    128

    (2

    27);

    Y/N

    N; N

    NN

    /NN

    CSPr

    eval

    ence

    of S

    RMP

    75%

    of i

    ndiv

    idua

    ls w

    ith li

    mb

    ampu

    tatio

    ns e

    xhib

    ited

    SRM

    P In

    divi

    dual

    s with

    lim

    b am

    puta

    tions

    are

    mor

    e lik

    ely

    to p

    rese

    nt S

    RMP

    than

    any

    oth

    er d

    isabl

    ed g

    roup

    (O

    R=15

    .4) P

    rese

    nce

    of S

    RMP

    was

    ass

    ocia

    ted

    with

    a B

    MI

    betw

    een

    24.6

    and

    30.

    9 (O

    R=3.

    4) a

    nd m

    ore

    than

    7 h

    rs/

    wee

    k of

    trai

    ning

    (OR=

    3.8)

    Desm

    ond

    et

    al.[8

    7] (2

    008)

    6

    89;

    Y/N

    62/2

    7;

    ≥60m

    55 T

    T /

    30 T

    F / 4

    KD

    16 P

    VD,

    73 N

    on-

    PVD

    / Y

    89 U

    ni;

    LLCS

    Asso

    ciati

    on b

    etw

    een

    pain

    , pro

    sthe

    sis sa

    t-isf

    actio

    n an

    d ac

    tivity

    re

    stric

    tion

    Pain

    was

    ass

    ocia

    ted

    with

    pro

    sthe

    sis d

    issati

    sfac

    tion

    Pain

    pr

    esen

    ce w

    as n

    ot a

    ssoc

    iate

    d w

    ith a

    ctivi

    ty re

    stric

    tion

    a M

    ean

    or (r

    ange

    ) or [

    mea

    n –

    SD].

    b Tr

    aini

    ng p

    rogr

    amm

    e w

    as n

    ot st

    anda

    rdize

    d an

    d th

    e m

    easu

    rem

    ents

    wer

    e no

    t dist

    ribut

    ed a

    ccor

    ding

    to a

    stan

    dard

    sche

    dule

    thro

    ugho

    ut th

    e st

    udy

    dura

    tion.

    c Si

    mila

    r to

    ‘Nor

    dic

    wal

    king

    ’.d

    Valu

    e fo

    r the

    tota

    l sam

    ple,

    incl

    udin

    g in

    divi

    dual

    s with

    lim

    b am

    puta

    tions

    .e

    A hi

    gher

    locu

    s of c

    ontr

    ol re

    pres

    ents

    a m

    ore

    exte

    rnal

    ized

    pers

    on. f

    The

    abi

    lity

    to in

    crea

    se e

    nerg

    y.g

    Char

    acte

    ristic

    s for

    the

    who

    le p

    opul

    ation

    (n =

    132

    ).h

    Poss

    ibly

    the

    sam

    e st

    udy

    popu

    latio

    n.i S

    imila

    r res

    ults

    repo

    rted

    by

    the

    thre

    e st

    udie

    s for

    spor

    t par

    ticip

    ation

    and

    use

    of s

    peci

    al sp

    ort p

    rost

    hese

    s.j I

    ncon

    siste

    nt d

    ata

    pres

    ente

    d by

    the

    auth

    or.

    k Ch

    arac

    teris

    tics f

    or th

    e w

    hole

    stud

    y po

    pula

    tion.

    l Aut

    hors

    stat

    e th

    at th

    e po

    pula

    tion

    sam

    ple

    was

    too

    smal

    l to

    sust

    ain

    a ‘st

    atisti

    cally

    relia

    ble

    conc

    lusio

    n’.

    m 6

    5.2%

    wer

    e ov

    er 6

    0 ye

    ars o

    f age

    .AB

    = ab

    le-b

    odie

    d; A

    BIS

    = Am

    pute

    e Bo

    dy-Im

    age

    Scal

    e; A

    D= a

    nkle

    disa

    rticu

    latio

    n; A

    DL =

    acti

    vitie

    s of d

    aily

    livi

    ng; A

    T =

    anae

    robi

    c th

    resh

    old;

    BM

    I = b

    ody

    mas

    s ind

    ex; B

    P =

    bloo

    d pr

    essu

    re; C

    HART

    = C

    raig

    Han

    dica

    p As

    sess

    men

    t Rep

    ortin

    g Te

    chni

    que;

    CS=

    cro

    ss-s

    ectio

    nal;

    ED=

    elbo

    w d

    isarti

    cula

    tion;

    G/S

    = g

    ener

    al c

    ause

    for a

    mpu

    tatio

    n/sp

    ecifi

    c nu

    mbe

    rs

    per c

    ause

    ; HD=

    hip

    disa

    rticu

    latio

    n; H

    P =

    hem

    ipel

    vect

    omy;

    HR=

    hea

    rt ra

    te; H

    R max

    = m

    axim

    um H

    R; IL

    P =

    indi

    vidu

    al le

    isure

    pro

    file;

    in/e

    x =

    incl

    usio

    n/ex

    clus

    ion

    crite

    ria re

    port

    ed;

    KD=

    knee

    disa

    rticu

    latio

    n; L

    L =

    low

    er li

    mb;

    M=

    men

    ; MBS

    RQ=

    Mul

    tidim

    ensio

    nal B

    ody-

    Self

    Rela

    tions

    Que

    stion

    naire

    ; N=

    no, d

    ata

    miss

    ing

    or c

    riter

    ion

    not f

    ulfil

    led;

    non

    -Pro

    sL

    = no

    n-pr

    osth

    etic

    limb;

    non

    -PVD

    = a

    ny c

    ause

    of a

    mpu

    tatio

    n ot

    her t

    han

    perip

    hera

    l vas

    cula

    r dise

    ase,

    incl

    udin

    g tr

    aum

    a, in

    fecti

    on o

    r can

    cer;

    OR=

    odd

    s rati

    o; P

    A= p

    hysic

    al a

    c-tiv

    ity; P

    CI =

    phy

    siolo

    gica

    l cos

    t ind

    ex c

    alcu

    late

    d us

    ing

    the

    valu

    es o

    btai

    ned

    from

    the

    2 m

    in te

    st a

    s fol

    low

    s: [H

    R fini

    sh -

    HRre

    st]/

    spee

    d; P

    rosL

    = p

    rost

    hetic

    lim

    b; P

    VD=

    perip

    hera

    l vas

    -cu

    lar d

    iseas

    e; Q

    oL =

    qua

    lity

    of li

    fe; Q

    S= q

    ualit

    y sc

    ore

    of th

    e st

    udy;

    RCT

    = ra

    ndom

    ised

    cont

    rolle

    d tr

    ial;

    RP=

    rota

    tionp

    last

    y; S

    (n) =

    num

    ber o

    f sub

    ject

    s with

    lim

    b am

    puta

    tions

    (to

    tal n

    umbe

    r of p

    artic

    ipan

    ts);

    SF =

    stro

    ke fr

    eque

    ncy;

    SRM

    P= sp

    ort r

    elat

    ed m

    uscl

    e pa

    in; T

    F =

    tran

    s-fe

    mor

    al; T

    T =

    tran

    s-tib

    ial;

    UL

    = up

    per l

    imb;

    VO

    2max

    = m

    axim

    al o

    xyge

    n up

    take

    vol

    ume;

    W=

    wom

    en; W

    max

    = m

    axim

    al p

    ower

    out

    put;

    Y =

    yes,

    dat

    a pr

    esen

    t or c

    riter

    ion

    fulfi

    lled.

  • Amputees and sports: a systematic review 35

    DISCUSSION

    The aim of this study was to systematically review the literature on biomechanical characteristics, cardiopulmonary function, psychological wellbeing, sport participation and physical functioning and injury characteristics related to sports and/or physical activity among individuals with upper and/or lower limb amputations. Only 47 (1.3%) out of 3689 papers initially identified were selected for inclusion in this systematic review. Most of the included studies were older than 10 years, were observational, had cross-sectional designs and used convenience sampling from a single rehabilitation centre. In most studies, the mean age of the study participants was below 65 years, and the study samples consisted of a high percentage of individuals with non-vascular amputations. The general population of individuals with limb amputations has an average age above 65 years, and most of these individuals have vascular amputations.[92] Due to this difference, the results of the current review do not necessarily apply to the general populations of individuals with limb amputations.

    Age, gender and amputation level were found to influence running and long jumping performance in athletes with limb amputations.[62-64;76] Participation in sports and physical activity positively influences their physical fitness, psychosocial well-being and physical functioning.[27-29;32;33;71;80] A more proximal amputation, older age and a vascular cause of amputation may lead to more problems in completing the activities of daily living among individuals with limb amputations.[77;79;85] Various studies have identified different factors influencing participation in sports among individuals with limb amputations without reaching overall agreement on a single one. In clinical practice, the type of sport or physical activity should be chosen according to each patient’s characteristics, needs and physical capabilities.

    When young individuals with a trans-tibial amputation are able to run,[58] they can participate in a wide range of sports in which running is a basic component. Athletic performance was determined by the amputation level, with more proximal amputations leading to poorer performance as a result of more pronounced limb asymmetry.[60;64;65] For long jumpers with trans-tibial amputations, better results were recorded among individuals who used their prosthetic limb for take-off compared to those using their intact limb for take-

  • 36 Chapter 2

    off.[61] The findings of two studies, one[93;94] with a small sample size (n= 5 ) and a literature review[70] suggest that prosthesis characteristics influence running performance, therefore influencing also athletic performance. To clarify the influence of prosthesis characteristics on athletic performance, further research is needed in which athletes with limb amputations are repeatedly tested with different types of prostheses. Every athlete with a limb amputation should be assessed individually because each has a unique running style. Individual prosthesis modifications, special components or advice may be required.

    One study investigated swimming technique among individuals with upper-limb amputations.[56] The authors concluded that when swimming at higher speeds (at least 75% of the individual’s maximum swimming speed), stroke frequency was more important than stroke length in gaining and maintaining speed. The similar results found for running[58] may indicate that for increasing speed in running or swimming, athletes with limb amputations rely more on increasing their pace than on the length of their stride or stroke. Because data regarding swimming characteristics are available only from a single study, further research on this topic is needed before drawing conclusions.

    Cardiopulmonary function of individuals with limb amputations was better when a simple physical exercise program was included in their rehabilitation program. The intensity of the program should be based on each individual’s heart rate during AT and should not exceed 80% of the maximum peak value.[68] Individuals with limb amputations must be subjected to a maximal test to obtain a peak value. This is not always possible because vigorous physical activity may be contraindicated by underlying cardiac problems. Therefore, only individuals with limb amputations who are healthy enough to undergo a peak test should do so. If an individual cannot be subjected to a peak test, clinicians can adjust the value for able-bodied persons of the same age according to the individual’s physical condition. The rehabilitation programs may vary in duration, intensity, desired results and available rehabilitation time. An ergometer test can be used along with questionnaires (Medical Outcome Study 36-item short-form, SF-36,[95] and Prosthesis Evaluation Questionnaire, PEQ[96]) to assess the ability to walk. Individuals with lower limb amputations who are able to achieve an exercise intensity of 50% VO2max[72] or 60 watts can be expected to become successful prosthetic walkers.[66;72] When an individual’s walking prognosis is known, the

  • Amputees and sports: a systematic review 37

    rehabilitation process can be adapted according to the expected outcome, therefore optimising the results.

    The psychological impact of the disability on athletes with limb amputations was found to be smaller as compared to athletes with other disabilities, such as audio-visual impairment or spinal cord injury.[23] This is an interesting finding considering that an amputation is often perceived by the able-bodied as one of the worst physical disabilities.[97] Unfortunately, no similar comparison between different disabilities has been performed in non-sporting or inactive individuals. Therefore, we cannot say if this difference is due to selection bias. Participation in sports and physical activities has a positive influence on self-esteem, perceived body image and locus of control.[29;30;98] In general, the benefits of participation in sports outweigh the inconvenience of the disability. When individuals with limb amputations participate in sports and physical activities, they can set aside the concerns related to their disability. Because the majority of them have an underlying chronic disease, encouraging them to participate in sports may help them to overcome their disability by increasing their self-esteem. By taking part in organised sporting events, they can increase their knowledge of relevant sporting equipment and techniques to improve their performance. In addition, they improve their mobility skills, personal relationships and the acceptance of their own disability.[32] When surrounded by other individuals with physical disabilities, persons with limb amputations gain a sense of normality, and they may feel more comfortable with their disability.[99]

    Participation in sports decreases following amputation.[74] In Europe, 11 to 39% of individuals with limb amputations participate in sports or regular physical activity, while in the United States this percentage is 61%.[37;38;75;76;79;83] This high percentage may be biased by sample characteristics in the United States studies, including an average age of 52 years and predominantly traumatic limb amputation in the study samples.[49-51] In general, individuals with limb amputations are older than 65, and more than 80% have a vascular cause for amputation.[92] The difference between European and North American studies may also be related to general differences in sports and physical activity habits between European and North American people.[100] The sports that individuals with limb amputations prefer to take part in are similar regardless of the continent: swimming, cycling, golf, fishing, fitness.[37;38;80;83] Most individuals with limb amputations do not use special sport prostheses because of high costs, lack

  • 38 Chapter 2

    of knowledge about such prostheses or the feeling that they are unnecessary.[37;38;80;83] A high percentage (42%) of all individuals with limb amputations reported at least one complaint about their prosthesis or about the sport organisation in which they participated.[37] Sport participation appears to be hindered to some extent by unavailability of a suitable prosthesis, poor performance or high cost of the prosthesis, inadequate facilities or insufficient information.[37;38] To increase sport participation, these factors have to be addressed. Individuals with limb amputations could be introduced to sports that do not require prosthesis use, like wheelchair or sitting sports. Professionals should encourage individuals with limb amputations to participate more in sports or physical activities and advise them in choosing appropriate sport prosthesis.

    Several factors were associated with the physical functioning, mobility and activity level following amputation, including age,[38;76;79] aetiology,[38] amputation level and previous sport participation.[77;80;85] However, discrepancies were found concerning the importance of aetiology[37;78;79] and amputation level.[38;76] For example, two studies[78;79] using samples with different proportions of vascular and nonvascular amputations had similar main outcomes. This finding might lead to the conclusion that aetiology has no influence on sport participation and mobility outcomes. This statement contradicts other results on this topic[38;76;101] showing that individuals with non-vascular limb amputations are more active than individuals with vascular amputations. In some studies,[38;76;85] a more proximal amputation was found to lead to a decrease in sport participation. Other studies[37;83] have found similar rates of sport participation regardless of the amputation level. Less discrepancy exists concerning the influence of age on physical functioning, mobility and activity level following amputation.[38;76;79] Rehabilitation practitioners need to consider that a more proximal amputation, older age and the presence of comorbidity usually lead to a longer and more difficult rehabilitation.[102]

    Sport-related muscle pain was more frequent amongst individuals with limb amputations than amongst individuals with other physical disabilities.[88] This difference is probably caused by the relatively limited amount of muscular tissue still available, which is subjected to more intense use as compared to individuals with other physical disabilities. Only one study of sport injuries was found that focused completely on individuals with limb amputations.[86] Other papers

  • Amputees and sports: a systematic review 39

    assessed sport injuries in a mixed group of athletes with different locomotor disabilities.[103-106] Unfortunately, they did not address each disability as a separate category, making it impossible to identify disability-specific injury rates or patterns. Additionally, the sports in which individuals with limb amputations prefer to partake, such as fishing, swimming and golf,[23;38;77] were not investigated concerning injury rates or patterns.

    LIMITATIONS OF THE CURRENT SYSTEMATIC REVIEW

    The literature search used only the generic term “sports”, and no separate searches were conducted for studies involving individual sports. We assumed that studies relevant to the topic of this review would most likely have the word “sport” or “athlete” somewhere in their content or be registered under the Mesh terms “Sports” or “Physical Activity”. During the title assessment phase, papers were excluded if the title had no connection to the topic of the review. It is possible that some papers that did not include the word “sport” or were not included in the “Sports” Mesh category may have been incorrectly excluded. Therefore, a reference check of the included papers was performed, resulting in the identification of 29 additional studies. The minimum number of 10 participants was arbitrarily chosen to reduce the influence of outliers on outcome and to increase the possibility to generalise the results. Seventeen papers could not be retrieved due to unavailability or indexing errors. These papers included book chapters, dissertations and oral presentations. If, as in the main sample, only 1% of these missing papers could be included in this review, the effects on the main outcome would be negligible.

    The findings of this review should be interpreted cautiously because only few studies had a high methodological value. Only one randomised controlled trial was identified. Conducting a randomised controlled trial on individuals with limb amputations may prove difficult because of the limited number of subjects available. Additionally, physical activity tests can only be performed on a healthier subgroup of individuals with limb amputations. Finally, only four st