48
PREVENTING THE CAUSES OF DISEASE David Kim, PhD Vestergaard Frandsen West Africa 18 March 2011

University of Ghana SPH Lecture on Prevention

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: University of Ghana SPH Lecture on Prevention

PREVENTING THE CAUSES OF DISEASE

David Kim, PhD

Vestergaard Frandsen West Africa

18 March 2011

Page 2: University of Ghana SPH Lecture on Prevention

BIRTH DEATH

HEALTH

DISEASE

Page 3: University of Ghana SPH Lecture on Prevention
Page 4: University of Ghana SPH Lecture on Prevention

The Workplace

Page 5: University of Ghana SPH Lecture on Prevention

Mine

Page 6: University of Ghana SPH Lecture on Prevention

Busy Street

Page 7: University of Ghana SPH Lecture on Prevention

Farm

Page 8: University of Ghana SPH Lecture on Prevention

The Environment

Page 9: University of Ghana SPH Lecture on Prevention

Indoor Cooking

Page 10: University of Ghana SPH Lecture on Prevention

Swimming Pools

Page 11: University of Ghana SPH Lecture on Prevention

Vehicular Emissions

Page 12: University of Ghana SPH Lecture on Prevention

Prevention

The act of hinderingMerriam-Webter’s dictionary

Page 13: University of Ghana SPH Lecture on Prevention
Page 14: University of Ghana SPH Lecture on Prevention

Prevention of Disease Requires…

1. Hazard identification

2. Dose-response assessment

3. Exposure assessment

4. Risk characterization

Page 15: University of Ghana SPH Lecture on Prevention

Hazard Identification

Group Exercise:

You are part of a public health team that has been sent

to a neighbourhood of a city where parents have been

complaining of their children experiencing coughing,

runny noses, and fevers that won’t go away. The

number of children with these symptoms is growing

every year; the numbers are 4 times larger than

expected. With your team, discuss the possible causes

of these symptoms.

Page 16: University of Ghana SPH Lecture on Prevention

Childhood Leukaemia in Woburn

• A 1981 Department of Public Health study confirmed a childhood leukaemia cluster in Woburn, MA. The number of cases was 4 times higher than the national average.

• Woburn has a 130-year industrial history that resulted in significant local deposition of chemical manufacturing waste.

Page 17: University of Ghana SPH Lecture on Prevention

Epidemiology

• Epidemiology is the basic science of public health.

• Purpose is to study (1) the distribution of disease in a population, and (2) the determinants of that disease.

• Concerned with person, place, and time.

Page 18: University of Ghana SPH Lecture on Prevention

Person

Page 19: University of Ghana SPH Lecture on Prevention

Place

• Family

• Village

• City

• Country

• Continent

• Global

Page 20: University of Ghana SPH Lecture on Prevention

Time

• Hour

• Day

• Week

• Month

• Year

• Decade

• Century

Page 21: University of Ghana SPH Lecture on Prevention

Unit of Measure

1000 people living in Accracontracted the flu last year. Whatis the incidence rate?

Page 22: University of Ghana SPH Lecture on Prevention

Relative Risk

The IR of swine flu when flying with Deltais 2 cases per 1000 people each week. TheIR of swine flu on all airlines is 1 case per1000 each week. What is the RR of gettingswine flu when flying with Delta?

Page 23: University of Ghana SPH Lecture on Prevention

Woburn MA: person

• Child diagnosed with leukaemia before 19th

birthday.

• Diagnosed between 1969 and 1989.

• A resident of Woburn MA at the time of diagnosis.

Page 24: University of Ghana SPH Lecture on Prevention

Woburn MA: place

Page 25: University of Ghana SPH Lecture on Prevention

Woburn MA: time

Page 26: University of Ghana SPH Lecture on Prevention

Woburn MA: Relative Risk

RR = 9

For those living near contaminatedwell water relative to all residentsof Woburn. Is there a reason forconcern?

Page 27: University of Ghana SPH Lecture on Prevention

Summary of Epidemiology Studies

Advantages

• Study human populations.

• Can examine adverse effects associated with exposures to risk factors in real time.

• Convincing data if studies are conducted correctly.

Disadvantages

• Long time to execute

• Costly

• Difficult to establish causality

Page 28: University of Ghana SPH Lecture on Prevention

Dose-Response Assessment

• Determine whether the causative agent can damage human cells/tissues/organs.

• Studies are typically conducted in laboratories.

• Fundamental science is toxicology

Page 29: University of Ghana SPH Lecture on Prevention

Toxicology

Paracelsus, the father of

toxicology

“The dose makes the poison”

Page 30: University of Ghana SPH Lecture on Prevention

Toxicokinetics

• What the body does to the chemical.

• Defined by absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion (ADME).

• Establishes the DOSE in dose-response.

Page 31: University of Ghana SPH Lecture on Prevention

Toxicodynamics

• What the chemical does to the body.

• Defined by cellular damage, DNA modifications, protein concentration changes, etc.

• Establishes the RESPONSE in dose-response.

Decreased dopamine levels in Parkinson’s disease patients

Page 32: University of Ghana SPH Lecture on Prevention

In Vivo Experiments

Page 33: University of Ghana SPH Lecture on Prevention

In Vitro Experiments

Page 34: University of Ghana SPH Lecture on Prevention

In Silico Experiments

Page 35: University of Ghana SPH Lecture on Prevention

Dose-Response Curves

• NOAEL: No Observed Adverse Effect Level

• LOAEL: Lowest Observed Adverse Effect Level

Page 36: University of Ghana SPH Lecture on Prevention

Dose-Response Curve for Cr(VI)

Page 37: University of Ghana SPH Lecture on Prevention

Summary of Toxicology Studies

Advantages

• Highly controlled.

• Fast results.

• Can better establish causal relationship between dose and effect.

Disadvantages

• Laboratory conditions

• Extensive use of animals

• Questionable relevance to humans

Page 38: University of Ghana SPH Lecture on Prevention

Exposure Assessment

Study of contaminant levels in:

– Air

– Water

– Soil

– Biological Samples

– Food

Page 39: University of Ghana SPH Lecture on Prevention

Objectives of Exposure Assessment

• Measure the amount of contaminant in the environment.

• Record how often humans come into contact with the contaminant.

• Identify who comes into contact with the contaminant.

Page 40: University of Ghana SPH Lecture on Prevention

Air Monitoring

Page 41: University of Ghana SPH Lecture on Prevention

Water Monitoring

Page 42: University of Ghana SPH Lecture on Prevention

Spoil Monitoring

Page 43: University of Ghana SPH Lecture on Prevention

Biological Monitoring

Page 44: University of Ghana SPH Lecture on Prevention
Page 45: University of Ghana SPH Lecture on Prevention

Summary of Exposure Studies

Advantages

• Quantitative

• Real-world values

Disadvantages

• High cost of conducting studies (i.e., analytical chemistry)

• Small number of samples due to intensive nature of studies

Page 46: University of Ghana SPH Lecture on Prevention

Risk Characterization

• Final phase of a risk assessment.

• Integrates information collected from EPIDEMIOLOGY, TOXICOLOGY, and EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT studies.

• Qualitative and quantitative conclusions.

• Synthesizes all the information and recommends actions to prevent diseases from spreading.

Page 47: University of Ghana SPH Lecture on Prevention

Risk Characterization for Cr(VI)

• Clearly there is an association between leukaemia and living where Cr(VI) levels are high.

• Toxicological studies demonstrate a positive dose-response, suggesting a causal relationship.

• Exposure studies have measured presence of Cr(VI) levels in drinking water that exceed health standards.

• All evidence seems to point to the need to reduce Cr(VI) levels in order to prevent childhood leukaemia from occurring.

Page 48: University of Ghana SPH Lecture on Prevention

Final Group Exercise

• Small-scale mining in Ghana.• Mercury is used to clean gold

nuggets.• Mercury is associated with skin

cancer and other deadly ailments later in life.

• Environmental contamination has made water undrinkable.

• Biological monitoring shows that people are exposed to dangerous levels of mercury.

What evidence do you need to evaluate whether or not preventive action should be taken?