26
Improving our Global Infrastructure: The International Geodesign Collaboration Brian Orland University of Georgia, USA Carl Steinitz Harvard University, USA; UCL/CASA, UK Digital Landscape Architecture Dessau Campus Anhalt University 22-26 May, 2019

University of Georgia, USA Infrastructure · 2019-06-12 · The International Geodesign Collaboration compares the approaches and experiences of globally dispersed teams. IGC 2019

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    0

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: University of Georgia, USA Infrastructure · 2019-06-12 · The International Geodesign Collaboration compares the approaches and experiences of globally dispersed teams. IGC 2019

Improving our Global Infrastructure: The International Geodesign Collaboration

Brian Orland University of Georgia, USA

Carl SteinitzHarvard University, USA;

UCL/CASA, UK

Digital Landscape Architecture

Dessau CampusAnhalt University

22-26 May, 2019

Page 2: University of Georgia, USA Infrastructure · 2019-06-12 · The International Geodesign Collaboration compares the approaches and experiences of globally dispersed teams. IGC 2019

The world faces a critical question:

How do we organize ourselves globally to address climate and population challenges that threaten us all?

A major impediment is our inability to share advances in the field quickly and effectively. The International Geodesign Collaboration (www.geodesigncollab.org) was conceived as a means to address this challenge.

Page 3: University of Georgia, USA Infrastructure · 2019-06-12 · The International Geodesign Collaboration compares the approaches and experiences of globally dispersed teams. IGC 2019

Carl Steinitz, Harvard GSD, USA; UCL/CASA, UK

Brian Orland, University of Georgia, USA

Tom Fisher, University of Minnesota, USA

Ryan Perkl, Esri, USA

Michael Gould, Esri, USA/Spain

Page 4: University of Georgia, USA Infrastructure · 2019-06-12 · The International Geodesign Collaboration compares the approaches and experiences of globally dispersed teams. IGC 2019

The International Geodesign Collaboration compares the approaches and experiences of globally dispersed teams.

IGC 2019 teams tackled the projects they would normally do, but using a common framework of guiding assumptions, project sizes, scenarios, analytical systems and presentation formats.

By doing so, they enabled direct comparisons among projects and revealed insights into the different priorities and constraints of teams working in contrasting governmental, climatic and demographic settings.

Page 5: University of Georgia, USA Infrastructure · 2019-06-12 · The International Geodesign Collaboration compares the approaches and experiences of globally dispersed teams. IGC 2019

The IGC Agreement

Objectives:

We need to show how geodesign helps us solve very big problems.

We need to adopt some constraints in order to make meaningful comparisons

Hence we invite you to join and propose:

Adoption of common global future scenarios plus local ones

Studying nested geographic area sizes and scales of common dimensions

Commitment to studying common land use/land cover systems

Studying impacts under common scenarios, at common time stages

Publishing/exhibiting the results using common presentation formats

Conducting research to capture what we learn

Page 6: University of Georgia, USA Infrastructure · 2019-06-12 · The International Geodesign Collaboration compares the approaches and experiences of globally dispersed teams. IGC 2019

THE TEN IGC SYSTEMS

IGC SCENARIOS AND TIME STAGES IGC PRESENTATION FORMATS

IGC PROJECT SIZES

Squares: 0.5, 1, 2, 5, 10, 20, 40, 80, 160km

IGC Project Sizes, Systems, Scenarios, Timelines, and Presentation Formats

Page 7: University of Georgia, USA Infrastructure · 2019-06-12 · The International Geodesign Collaboration compares the approaches and experiences of globally dispersed teams. IGC 2019

IGC PARTICIPATING SCHOOLS

IGC PROJECTS

102 Schools

39 Countries

91 Projects

39 Countries

Page 8: University of Georgia, USA Infrastructure · 2019-06-12 · The International Geodesign Collaboration compares the approaches and experiences of globally dispersed teams. IGC 2019

Participants in the International Geodesign Collaboration

Page 9: University of Georgia, USA Infrastructure · 2019-06-12 · The International Geodesign Collaboration compares the approaches and experiences of globally dispersed teams. IGC 2019

IGC Projects Sorted by Largest Study Site Areas

Page 10: University of Georgia, USA Infrastructure · 2019-06-12 · The International Geodesign Collaboration compares the approaches and experiences of globally dispersed teams. IGC 2019

Steinitz, C., A Framework for Geodesign (2012)

A Workflow for Geodesign (Steinitz, 2012)

Page 11: University of Georgia, USA Infrastructure · 2019-06-12 · The International Geodesign Collaboration compares the approaches and experiences of globally dispersed teams. IGC 2019

COORDINATOR

Research Teams

Page 12: University of Georgia, USA Infrastructure · 2019-06-12 · The International Geodesign Collaboration compares the approaches and experiences of globally dispersed teams. IGC 2019

Twelve Global Assumptions

Page 13: University of Georgia, USA Infrastructure · 2019-06-12 · The International Geodesign Collaboration compares the approaches and experiences of globally dispersed teams. IGC 2019

157 System Innovations

05

101520253035

Page 14: University of Georgia, USA Infrastructure · 2019-06-12 · The International Geodesign Collaboration compares the approaches and experiences of globally dispersed teams. IGC 2019

Typical projects – University College-London, Universita di Cagliari

Page 15: University of Georgia, USA Infrastructure · 2019-06-12 · The International Geodesign Collaboration compares the approaches and experiences of globally dispersed teams. IGC 2019

Typical projects – UAM-Mexico City, University of Southern California

Page 16: University of Georgia, USA Infrastructure · 2019-06-12 · The International Geodesign Collaboration compares the approaches and experiences of globally dispersed teams. IGC 2019
Page 17: University of Georgia, USA Infrastructure · 2019-06-12 · The International Geodesign Collaboration compares the approaches and experiences of globally dispersed teams. IGC 2019
Page 18: University of Georgia, USA Infrastructure · 2019-06-12 · The International Geodesign Collaboration compares the approaches and experiences of globally dispersed teams. IGC 2019
Page 19: University of Georgia, USA Infrastructure · 2019-06-12 · The International Geodesign Collaboration compares the approaches and experiences of globally dispersed teams. IGC 2019
Page 20: University of Georgia, USA Infrastructure · 2019-06-12 · The International Geodesign Collaboration compares the approaches and experiences of globally dispersed teams. IGC 2019

What did we learn – how big is a geodesign project?

• Projects addressed a wide range of scales, from urban projects only 0.5 x 0.5km to rural and wildland projects covering 160 x 160km.

• The majority of projects fell in the range 5 x 5km to 40 x 40km.

• While the majority had Urban components, many addressed Suburban and Rural areas. Larger project areas tended to cover a continuum from urban to rural or wildland.

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

0

5

10

15

20

25

0,5 1 2 5 10 20 40 80 160

# projects at each maximum size

Page 21: University of Georgia, USA Infrastructure · 2019-06-12 · The International Geodesign Collaboration compares the approaches and experiences of globally dispersed teams. IGC 2019

What did we learn about geodesign systems?

• Although participant expertise was mostly in green and water infrastructure, overall there was expertise in all nine systems.

• Most project teams addressed the nine systems specified in the IGC agreement.

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

System interest/expertise

0

5

10

15

20

25

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

Number of IGC Systems used

0

10

20

30

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

Number of team-specified systems

Number of team-specified systems

Page 22: University of Georgia, USA Infrastructure · 2019-06-12 · The International Geodesign Collaboration compares the approaches and experiences of globally dispersed teams. IGC 2019

What did we learn about geodesign?

• Although participant expertise was mostly in green and water infrastructure, overall there was expertise in all nine systems.

• Most project teams addressed the nine systems specified in the IGC agreement.

Dominant Land Systems by 2050 (Early Adopter scenarios)

Design for growing (left) vs. shrinking (right) populations

Graphics by Kristina Hill, Richard Kingston, Alenka Poplin

Page 23: University of Georgia, USA Infrastructure · 2019-06-12 · The International Geodesign Collaboration compares the approaches and experiences of globally dispersed teams. IGC 2019

RESEARCH PROJECTS

All presentation materials will

be available in their original

INDESIGN, POWERPOINT,

and ILLUSTRATOR formats,

enabling machine-translation

of text. All collaborators in the

IGC agree that any participant

can translate, print and exhibit

the work of any other school,

provided that credit is always

given to IGC and the

originating school.

IGC 2019 Materials Available via geodesigncollab.org

Page 24: University of Georgia, USA Infrastructure · 2019-06-12 · The International Geodesign Collaboration compares the approaches and experiences of globally dispersed teams. IGC 2019
Page 25: University of Georgia, USA Infrastructure · 2019-06-12 · The International Geodesign Collaboration compares the approaches and experiences of globally dispersed teams. IGC 2019

Joining IGC 2020

• Retain project area sizes

• Retain design scenarios and timelines

• Evaluate and update innovations

• Adopt UNDP Sustainable Development Goals as IGC goals

• Re-think systems in light of SDGs

• Evaluate and update workflow

Page 26: University of Georgia, USA Infrastructure · 2019-06-12 · The International Geodesign Collaboration compares the approaches and experiences of globally dispersed teams. IGC 2019

geodesigncollab.org