17
University of Birmingham Assessing the later prehistoric environmental archaeology and landscape development of the Cetina Valley, Croatia Smith, David; Gaffney, Vincent; Howard, Andrew; Smith, Katharine; Tetlow, Emma; Grossman, D; Tinsley, H Document Version Early version, also known as pre-print Citation for published version (Harvard): Smith, D, Gaffney, V, Howard, A, Smith, K, Tetlow, E, Grossman, D & Tinsley, H 2006, 'Assessing the later prehistoric environmental archaeology and landscape development of the Cetina Valley, Croatia', Environmental Archaeology (Journal), vol. 11 (2), pp. 171-186. Link to publication on Research at Birmingham portal General rights Unless a licence is specified above, all rights (including copyright and moral rights) in this document are retained by the authors and/or the copyright holders. The express permission of the copyright holder must be obtained for any use of this material other than for purposes permitted by law. • Users may freely distribute the URL that is used to identify this publication. • Users may download and/or print one copy of the publication from the University of Birmingham research portal for the purpose of private study or non-commercial research. • User may use extracts from the document in line with the concept of ‘fair dealing’ under the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 (?) • Users may not further distribute the material nor use it for the purposes of commercial gain. Where a licence is displayed above, please note the terms and conditions of the licence govern your use of this document. When citing, please reference the published version. Take down policy While the University of Birmingham exercises care and attention in making items available there are rare occasions when an item has been uploaded in error or has been deemed to be commercially or otherwise sensitive. If you believe that this is the case for this document, please contact [email protected] providing details and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate. Download date: 08. Mar. 2020

University of Birmingham Assessing the later prehistoric ...pure-oai.bham.ac.uk/ws/files/8226498/Smith_et_al._Cetina_River_Valley.pdfis around 12,000 km2 (Bonacci and Roje-Bonacci

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    3

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: University of Birmingham Assessing the later prehistoric ...pure-oai.bham.ac.uk/ws/files/8226498/Smith_et_al._Cetina_River_Valley.pdfis around 12,000 km2 (Bonacci and Roje-Bonacci

University of Birmingham

Assessing the later prehistoric environmentalarchaeology and landscape development of theCetina Valley, CroatiaSmith, David; Gaffney, Vincent; Howard, Andrew; Smith, Katharine; Tetlow, Emma;Grossman, D; Tinsley, H

Document VersionEarly version, also known as pre-print

Citation for published version (Harvard):Smith, D, Gaffney, V, Howard, A, Smith, K, Tetlow, E, Grossman, D & Tinsley, H 2006, 'Assessing the laterprehistoric environmental archaeology and landscape development of the Cetina Valley, Croatia', EnvironmentalArchaeology (Journal), vol. 11 (2), pp. 171-186.

Link to publication on Research at Birmingham portal

General rightsUnless a licence is specified above, all rights (including copyright and moral rights) in this document are retained by the authors and/or thecopyright holders. The express permission of the copyright holder must be obtained for any use of this material other than for purposespermitted by law.

•Users may freely distribute the URL that is used to identify this publication.•Users may download and/or print one copy of the publication from the University of Birmingham research portal for the purpose of privatestudy or non-commercial research.•User may use extracts from the document in line with the concept of ‘fair dealing’ under the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 (?)•Users may not further distribute the material nor use it for the purposes of commercial gain.

Where a licence is displayed above, please note the terms and conditions of the licence govern your use of this document.

When citing, please reference the published version.

Take down policyWhile the University of Birmingham exercises care and attention in making items available there are rare occasions when an item has beenuploaded in error or has been deemed to be commercially or otherwise sensitive.

If you believe that this is the case for this document, please contact [email protected] providing details and we will remove access tothe work immediately and investigate.

Download date: 08. Mar. 2020

Page 2: University of Birmingham Assessing the later prehistoric ...pure-oai.bham.ac.uk/ws/files/8226498/Smith_et_al._Cetina_River_Valley.pdfis around 12,000 km2 (Bonacci and Roje-Bonacci

Assessing the later prehistoric environmentalarchaeology and landscape development ofthe Cetina Valley, Croatia

David Smith, Vince Gaffney, Darja Grossman, Andy J. Howard, Ante Milosevic,Kristof Ostir, Tomas Podobnikar, Wendy Smith, Emma Tetlow, Martin Tingleand Heather Tinsley

This paper describes preliminary work on the environmental and archaeological potential of the

Cetina River Valley, Croatia. Two seasons of fieldwork and assessment have suggested that

the valley contains a preserved landscape, much of which is waterlogged. It is clear that there is

the potential to address many local and regional questions concerning land use, subsistence and

environmental change in an area where previously only limited environmental archaeology has

been undertaken. One pressing issue is how to prospect for both cultural and environmental

archaeological deposits within this regional landscape. This is especially true in cases where little

‘base-line data’ exists. This paper outlines the current practice and suggests a number of new

approaches to prospecting for environmental ‘hotspots’.

Keywords: environmental prospection, Cetina Valley, Dalmatia, Lidar

Geology and topographical background

The Cetina River rises from a spring at Milasevo and

flows a distance of 105 km to the Adriatic Sea

(Fig. 1). In total, the drainage area of the catchment

is around 12,000 km2 (Bonacci and Roje-Bonacci

2003). Today the river has an annual discharge of

105 m2 s21 as a consequence of a mean annual

rainfall of 1380mm (Bonacci and Roje-Bonacci 2003).

The Cetina Valley is bounded to the east by the

bulk of the Dinaric Alps, which rise to an altitude of

2000 m, and to the west by Mount Svilaja (1500 m).

The majority of the catchment drains calcareous

rocks of Cretaceous age, predominantly limestone.

Rocks of Triassic and Jurassic age also crop out in

the catchment and include dolomitic limestone and

flysch. The underlying karst geology controls relief

with a series of structurally aligned basins separated

by high ridges, forming a dramatic landscape.

The Cetina Valley itself (Figs. 2 and 3) is divided

into four large flat-bottomed basins (known locally as

the ‘polje’ or ‘fields’) linked by narrow valley floors.

The two smaller basins in the north of the area, Pasko

and Vrlicko Polje, are at present not used for

agricultural production. South of the modern reser-

voir at Peruca, the small basin of Hrvatacko is again

mainly uncultivated. It contains the Roman colonia

at Citluk and to the south is bounded by the dramatic

limestone ridge at Glavice. The southern basin,

Sinjsko Polje, is approximately 6 km by 4 km and

is the main area of cultivation around the small town

of Sinj. The landscape is characterised by channalised

drainage ditches, lines of willow trees, long open

fields and black peaty soils. To the British observer, it

is strikingly reminiscent of the Somerset Levels (see

Coles and Coles 1988). A modern bridge is located

just below the confluence of the Cetina with the Ruda

River at Trilj. South of this, the Cetina River flows

through a series of narrow gorges before it enters

the sea through the passage at Omis. A more easily

David Smith (corresponding author), Vince Gaffney, Andy Howard, WendySmith and Emma Tetlow, the Institute of Archaeology and Antiquity,University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK; e-mail:[email protected]; Darja Grossman, Department of Archaeology,Zavetiska 5, PO Box 580, SI-1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia; Ante Milosevic,Muzej Hrvatskih Arheoloskih Spomenika, Stjepana Gunjace b.b, HR -21000 Split, Croatia; Kristof Ostir, Tomas Podobnikar, Institute ofAnthropological and Spatial Studies at Scientific Research Centre ofSlovenian Academy of Sciences and Arts (ZRC SAZU), Gosposka 13,1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia; Martin Tingle, Dial House, High Street, Creaton,Northamptonshire NN6 8NA, UK; Heather Tinsley, School of GeographicalSciences, University of Bristol, University Road, Bristol BS8 1SS, UK.Received November 2004; revised manuscript accepted October 2005

� 2006 Association for Environmental ArchaeologyPublished by ManeyDOI 10.1179/174963106x123197 Environmental Archaeology 2006 VOL 11 NO 2 171

Page 3: University of Birmingham Assessing the later prehistoric ...pure-oai.bham.ac.uk/ws/files/8226498/Smith_et_al._Cetina_River_Valley.pdfis around 12,000 km2 (Bonacci and Roje-Bonacci

passable way out of Sinjsko Polje for both the ancient

and modern traveller lies to the south-east of Sinj

through the narrow gorge at Klis that passes through

the coastal mountains behind Split.

Archaeological and environmental background:Cetina in context

In terms of both archaeology and history, the Cetina

Valley and the narrow passage at Klis have always

functioned as a principal trade route between the

Dalmatian coast and the central Balkans.

Strategically, its position has been pivotal to the

development not only of the Balkans, but also of

significant parts of Europe. Although surveyed by Dr

Ante Milosevic and colleagues at the Museum of

Croatian Archaeological Monuments (Milosevic

1998), the area has never been the subject of a major

academic landscape and environmental archaeology

research programme, despite its long chronology of

habitation.

The earliest evidence for agricultural activity is

from the Early Neolithic, recorded in the upper

Cetina Valley (Muller 1994). In the Early Bronze Age

the Cetina Culture, a geographically pervasive group

with contacts throughout the Adriatic basin became

dominant (Marovic 2002; Marovic and Covic 1983).

Extensive ‘mound fields’ are recorded on the lower

valley slopes at several locations such as around

Cetina, Vrlika and Bajagic. The core area of the

culture has never been adequately defined or dated,

though the Cetina Valley appears to be particularly

‘wealthy’ when compared with other contemporary

areas of the Balkans (Marovic 2002; Marovic and

Covic 1983). The economy and landscape, which was

the basis for this rich culture, has not been studied in

detail. The evidence for the nature of settlement in the

valley at this time is limited, but where it exists it is

dramatic. In the early 1950s, Marovic (2002) exca-

vated a number of exceptionally well preserved

Bronze and Early Iron Age timber settlements along

Figure 1 The location of the Cetina Valley

Figure 2 Sketch map of the topography of the Cetina Valley

Smith et al. The Cetina Valley, Croatia

172 Environmental Archaeology 2006 VOL 11 NO 2

Page 4: University of Birmingham Assessing the later prehistoric ...pure-oai.bham.ac.uk/ws/files/8226498/Smith_et_al._Cetina_River_Valley.pdfis around 12,000 km2 (Bonacci and Roje-Bonacci

the river (Covic 1987, 444-5; Marovic 2002), which

are assumed to be contemporary with multi-period

hillforts that dominate the surrounding uplands.

As in other parts of Europe (Bradley 1998), the

river appears to have been the focus of the intentional

deposition of artefacts throughout prehistory. This is

particularly true at the confluence of the Cetina and

Ruda Rivers at Trilj. In recent years several hundred

metal objects have been recovered from the riverbed

including 30 Greeco-Illyrian helmets, over 15 Iron

Age swords, and even weaponry associated with the

Roman legions (Milosevic 1998). There is currently

no stratigraphic context for these finds, although

both the quantity and quality of the material accords

the phenomenon to be of international significance

(Gaffney 2004).

The area is intimately associated with the heartland

of the Delmatae and the area’s strategic importance is

emphasised by the citing of the legionary fortress at

Tilurium (Gardun) which guards the entrance to

the valley from the south and the approach to the

provincial capital at Salona. The valley also contains

the colony at Aequum (Citluk). During the early

medieval period, toponymic evidence suggests that

the Cetina Valley and perhaps the Cetina River itself,

became a frontier between Slavic and Late Roman

power. The area around Sinj eventually emerged as a

centre of Slavic power ultimately establishing itself as

a heartland of the Early Croatian State.

During later periods the area was highly contested

and passed between a number of regional and local

powers before conquest by the Ottoman Empire

during the early 16th century and re-organisation as

part of the Klis Sandjak after which, it retained a

frontier role until the re-conquest of the area 150

years later (Malcolm 1994, 90). This period is

particularly known for the construction of a number

of dramatically positioned castles, such as that at

Klis, as well as others at key ‘choke points’ in the

Cetina gorge downstream of Trilj.

In contrast to this rich and dramatic archaeological

and historical record, there is an almost complete

absence of environmental archaeological evidence

from southern Croatia. Fig. 4 shows the distribution

of the pollen cores in the region (data taken from the

European Pollen Database, www.ngdc.noaa.gov)

and demonstrates clearly that southern Dalmatia is

recognised as a pronounced lacuna in the European

pollen record (Willis 1994). The nearest pollen

diagram is from Bokanjacko Blato in north

Dalmatia. However, this pollen diagram is partial

and poorly preserved (Gruger 1996). South of the

Figure 4 Pollen sites from the Balkans and North

Mediterranean (taken from the European Data

Base for pollen (www.ngdc.noaa.gov))

Figure 3 Hrvatacko Polje and Sinjsko Polje showing the

location of the sites investigated

Smith et al. The Cetina Valley, Croatia

Environmental Archaeology 2006 VOL 11 NO 2 173

Page 5: University of Birmingham Assessing the later prehistoric ...pure-oai.bham.ac.uk/ws/files/8226498/Smith_et_al._Cetina_River_Valley.pdfis around 12,000 km2 (Bonacci and Roje-Bonacci

Cetina Valley the pollen diagrams from Mljet Island,

Croatia (Beug 1961; 1962; 1967; Jahn 1990) and the

Neretva Lowlands, Bosnia Herzegovina (Brande

1989) are also of limited value. The nearest sub-

stantial studies to the south are from northern Greece

(Bottema 1974; Willis 1995). To the north the nearest

diagram is from Istria, Croatia (Beug 1977) and those

from the Ljubljana Barje (Culiberg and Sercelj 1991;

Gardener 1997; Sercelj 1982; 1996) and other areas

of Slovenia (Andric 2001) some distance away. In

addition there is a very limited history of work on

plant macrofossils and insect remains in Dalmatia.

As a consequence of this lack of work, there is no

high-resolution regional or local environmental

framework in which cultural archaeological research

can be placed.

Though recent political factors and a lack of a local

‘tradition’ for environmental archaeology may have a

role to play in explaining the dearth of previous

research; the main issue appears to be one of

preservation. In general, the permeability of the

underlying karst geology of Dalmatia does not

favour waterlogging and hence the preservation of a

biological archive; however, the broad expanse of

wetland mires and peatlands in the Cetina Valley

appears to be an exception to this rule. The contrast

between the Cetina Valley and others in Dalmatia

and the wider Balkans is striking. Although neigh-

bouring valleys in Bosnia and Herzegovina contain

peatlands and wetlands, they appear to lack the

associated wealth of material culture that is present in

the Cetina Valley. The combined environmental and

cultural wealth found in the Cetina Valley provides a

potential platform to answer research questions of

international significance including the spread of

agriculture and settlement throughout the Balkans,

central and northern Europe and other issues related

to climate change (Willis and Bennett 1994; Bonsall

et al. 2002; Bonsall et al. 2003).

Initial fieldwork and assessment of thegeomorphological potential of the Cetina ValleyMethods

The potential of the valley for a major palaeoenvir-

onmental research project was raised following an

initial inspection of the valley by VG, DG and AM in

August 2001 and an initial investigation of the

valley’s environmental potential was undertaken by

DS, AJH, AM and DG in November 2002. In

addition to a visual inspection of all four basins,

a limited number of cores were drilled using a

hand gouge auger to investigate the sediment

stratigraphy and potential for organic preservation

and to identify sites with the greatest potential for

further work.

In the summer of 2003 detailed assessment was

undertaken at three sites in Sinjsko Polje. This

consisted of two detailed auger transects at

Bilokapica Gradina and Okrulgo, which aimed to

establish the extent and nature of the site stratigra-

phy. The sediments encountered were described in the

field using standard sedimentological techniques and

the colour assessed using a Munsell soil colour chart.

The stratigraphy encountered at both sites is illu-

strated in Figs. 5–7. In addition, a single borehole

was sunk at the Ruda Pumping Station, near to the

confluence of the Ruda and Cetina Rivers, in order to

establish the depth and nature of the stratigraphy at

this site (Fig. 8).

Material was selected from all these sites for

radiocarbon dating, which was undertaken by Beta

Analytic (Florida, USA). These age estimates are

listed in Table 1.

Results

Field inspection clearly showed that Pasko and

Hrvatacko Polje contain a mosaic of palaeochannels

and active river channels forming part of an

anastomosed floodplain network. The former clearly

Table 1 Radiocarbon dates from the Cetina River valley

Laboratorynumber Sample number Materials Analysis Preparation

Measuredradiocarbon 13C/12C Conventional

2 sigmacalibration

187254 BK3-4 (BilokapicaGradina)

Organicsediment

AMS standard Acid washes 14190¡120BP 225?5 o/oo 14180¡

120BPcal. BC15560–14520

187255 KWW1 (Okruglo) Willow branchwood

Radiocarbonstandard

Acid/alkali/acid

2760¡BP 225?0 o/oo 2760¡BP cal. BC1030–810

187256 KWW2 (Okruglo) Willow branchwood

Radiocarbonstandard

Acid/alkali/acid

2640¡BP 225?0 o/oo 2640¡BP cal. BC900–770

187258 Ruda 5 (Ruda) Organicsediment

AMS standard Acid/alkali/acid

4090¡BP 229?2 o/oo 4020¡BP cal. BC2620–2460

187259 Ruda 6 (Ruda) Organicsediment

Radiometricstandard

Acid washes 5270¡BP 225?0 o/oo 5270¡BP cal. BC4240–3960

Smith et al. The Cetina Valley, Croatia

174 Environmental Archaeology 2006 VOL 11 NO 2

Page 6: University of Birmingham Assessing the later prehistoric ...pure-oai.bham.ac.uk/ws/files/8226498/Smith_et_al._Cetina_River_Valley.pdfis around 12,000 km2 (Bonacci and Roje-Bonacci

Fig

ure

5T

he

str

ati

gra

ph

yo

fth

eau

ger

tran

sect

belo

wB

ilo

kap

ica

Gra

din

a

Smith et al. The Cetina Valley, Croatia

Environmental Archaeology 2006 VOL 11 NO 2 175

Page 7: University of Birmingham Assessing the later prehistoric ...pure-oai.bham.ac.uk/ws/files/8226498/Smith_et_al._Cetina_River_Valley.pdfis around 12,000 km2 (Bonacci and Roje-Bonacci

Fig

ure

6T

he

str

ati

gra

ph

yo

fth

ew

est–

east

au

ger

tran

sect

fro

mth

ew

est

ban

ko

fth

eC

eti

na

Riv

er

at

Okru

glo

Smith et al. The Cetina Valley, Croatia

176 Environmental Archaeology 2006 VOL 11 NO 2

Page 8: University of Birmingham Assessing the later prehistoric ...pure-oai.bham.ac.uk/ws/files/8226498/Smith_et_al._Cetina_River_Valley.pdfis around 12,000 km2 (Bonacci and Roje-Bonacci

Fig

ure

7T

he

str

ati

gra

ph

yo

fth

ew

est–

east

au

ger

tran

sect

fro

mth

eis

lan

dat

Okru

glo

Smith et al. The Cetina Valley, Croatia

Environmental Archaeology 2006 VOL 11 NO 2 177

Page 9: University of Birmingham Assessing the later prehistoric ...pure-oai.bham.ac.uk/ws/files/8226498/Smith_et_al._Cetina_River_Valley.pdfis around 12,000 km2 (Bonacci and Roje-Bonacci

Fig

ure

8T

he

str

ati

gra

ph

yat

the

co

nfl

uen

ce

of

the

Ru

da

an

dC

eti

na

Riv

ers

Smith et al. The Cetina Valley, Croatia

178 Environmental Archaeology 2006 VOL 11 NO 2

Page 10: University of Birmingham Assessing the later prehistoric ...pure-oai.bham.ac.uk/ws/files/8226498/Smith_et_al._Cetina_River_Valley.pdfis around 12,000 km2 (Bonacci and Roje-Bonacci

marked by either standing water or reedbeds. In both

basins, augering established that these palaeochan-

nels contained considerable depths of both inorganic

and organic sediments. In Hrvatacko Polje over 2 m

of fine-grained sediment was recorded in one channel,

including a substantial lense of charcoal suggesting

that human activity must have occurred close by. A

second channel contained around 3?5 m of fine-

grained deposits, which below 1?8 m were highly

organic with plant macrofossils and wood preserved.

Vrlicko Polje contains a large body of ‘organic peat’

that was up to 1?7 m deep at its northern edge.

Though the upper Poljes of the Cetina Valley have

only been examined briefly, it is clear that these valley

basins contain a considerable depth of Holocene

deposits, including well-preserved organic sediments.

These basins, therefore, have the potential to produce

long proxy environmental records for pollen, plant

macrofossil and insect remains that should allow

both regional and local questions concerning climate

change, vegetation development and human impact

within the valley to be addressed. How these basins

were transformed through time in relation to natural

as well as cultural landscape changes in Sinjsko Polje

is a particularly interesting research issue.

At Panj on the valley side, a hundred-metre long

exposure of sediment provides evidence of soil

erosion, colluviation and palaeosol development

suggesting periods of both landscape stability and

instability. This sequence indicates that the valley has

the potential to address important questions con-

cerning the timing and mechanisms of landscape

degradation, in addition to raising issues concerning

the preservation of archaeological sites and artefacts,

their distribution and visibility (Brown 1992; Howard

and Macklin 1999).

Investigation of the geoarchaeology of Sinjsko

Polje centred on three sites (see Fig. 3 for location).

Bilokapica Gradina

This field site consisted of an area of black ‘peaty’

alluvial deposits below an extensive Late Bronze Age

and Iron Age hillfort to the south of the town of

Otok (Fig. 3). It was hoped that a study of the

environmental archive at this location would result in

a detailed reconstruction of the use of both the

hillfort and its surrounding landscape. A 120 m long

auger transect of nine boreholes was drilled to record

the underlying stratigraphy (Fig. 5). This work

illustrated that a sloping surface of limestone bedrock

is usually overlain by grey clay composed predomi-

nantly of weathered limestone; the grey clay was

dated by organic inclusions to 15,560–14,520 cal. BC

(Table 1). Above this, a sequence of organic silts of

varying preservation and humification was recorded.

This was interleaved by horizons of sandy silt

interpreted as hill wash. At the south-east end of

the transect, just below the slopes of the hillfort, a

thick lense of dark grey silty sand with charcoal and

fragments of pottery was recorded; this was inter-

preted as colluvium originating from the monadnock

on which the hillfort was situated.

Okruglo

This field site is approximately 1 km due east of the

town of Otok (Fig. 3) and was chosen because a

number of cut timbers, possibly associated with

timber platforms were known to protrude from the

contemporary riverbanks. Inspection of aerial photo-

graphs and maps suggested that the archaeological

site was originally situated on a small island, but had

subsequently been dissected by the excavation of an

artificial channel, which now holds the modern river.

This new channel was excavated as part of improve-

ments undertaken during construction of the Hydro-

Electric Power (HEP) Scheme during the 1960s. Both

survey by Ante Milosevic and a ‘swim over survey’ by

Croatian Army divers in 1992 indicated that the bed

of the river is covered in archaeology, including

worked wood, large quantities of animal bone,

pottery and metal work. Survey in 2003 by the

project team recorded the substantial worked tim-

bers, which are present along a 120 m face on both

banks of the river.

A 110 m long transect comprising 13 auger holes

was drilled in 2003 across the east–west axis of the

‘old’ island in order to establish the extent of this

archaeological site (Figs. 6 and 7). A 1–2 m thick

layer of organic grey silt containing pottery fragments

and charcoal was recorded overlying the limestone

bedrock across the whole of the original island. The

stratigraphy observed in the riverbanks confirms that

this layer represents the occupation horizon/palaeo-

landsurface. Further augering to the south and north

of this transect confirmed that the site covers an area

of 140 m north to south and 120 m east to west and

occupied the whole of the ‘old’ island. Two pieces of

waterlogged wood from the site produced radio-

carbon age estimates of 1030–810 cal. BC and 900–

700 cal. BC (Table 1). Layers of clay and silt, some of

which contain fragments of large freshwater bivalve

shellfish, overlie the occupation surface, suggesting

increasing wetness after the site was abandoned,

possibly associated with rising ground water levels or

Smith et al. The Cetina Valley, Croatia

Environmental Archaeology 2006 VOL 11 NO 2 179

Page 11: University of Birmingham Assessing the later prehistoric ...pure-oai.bham.ac.uk/ws/files/8226498/Smith_et_al._Cetina_River_Valley.pdfis around 12,000 km2 (Bonacci and Roje-Bonacci

increased flooding of the valley floor. At present, it is

unclear whether increased wetness, by whichever

mechanism, was responsible for the abandonment

of this site, but it is a hypothesis worthy of further

examination.

The pumping station at the confluence of the Ruda andCetina Rivers upstream of Trilj

This field site is located on the west bank of the

Cetina River, immediately below its confluence with

the Ruda River and adjacent to a HEP Pumping

Station (no. 3). It is believed to be the location of a

substantial Neolithic site (A. Milosevic, pers. comm.).

A single borehole was drilled through the deposits at

this location to investigate the stratigraphy (see

Fig. 8). In total, 2?5 m of deposits were recorded,

which were waterlogged below 1?6 m. Between 0?8

and 1?6 m, pale white sand with apparent charcoal

was observed and was correlated with a probable

occupation horizon observed in the eroding river-

bank by earlier workers. Overlying this occupation

horizon, clay and silt units, some with freshwater

bivalve shells were recorded. As at Okruglo, this

suggests increasing wetness of the valley floor at the

end of, or following occupation. Below 1?6 m,

approximately 1 m of wood peat was encountered

before bedrock was reached. Two radiocarbon dates

from this wood peat suggest that it spans the period

4240–3960 cal. BC to 2620–2460 cal. BC (Table 1).

Discussion

This preliminary assessment of the geoarchaeology of the

Cetina River Valley has clearly demonstrated that the

main basins in the catchment contain considerable depths

of organic-rich sediment capable of providing proxy

records of climate and land use. In some areas of Sinjsko

Polje this may represent a continuous record of

sedimentation from the Holocene back to more than

16,000 years BP. In the other basins the record may be

less continuous since it derives from relatively short-lived

palaeochannel deposits. However, with a careful program

of dating it may be possible to ‘stitch’ these palaeochannel

sequences together to form an almost continuous

environmental record. In addition, there are areas of

valley side colluvial deposits and palaeosols capable of

providing evidence for periods of increased slope-channel

coupling, landscape instability and stability.

Assessment of the biological archive in SinjskoPoljeMethods

A number of palaeoenvironmental samples were

collected at different depths from the sites at

Bilokapica Gradina and the Ruda Pumping Station

site using a gouge auger (the location of the samples

taken is illustrated on the profiles in Figs. 5 and 8). In

addition, a single sample of material was recovered

by hand excavation from the upper 10 cm of the

exposed riverbank archaeological site at Okruglo.

This material was collected for dating and to evaluate

the preservation of pollen, plant macrofossils and

insect remains.

Pollen from the samples was prepared using

standard techniques (Moore et al. 1991). The aim of

the assessment was to count at least 300 pollen grains

from each sample in order to assess the potential of the

material for full pollen analysis (pollen concentration

was so low at Bilokapica Gradina that this count could

not be reached). Identifications were made with

reference to type slides, standard keys, particularly

those in Moore et al. (1991), and the descriptions in

Andrew (1984). The results are shown in Table 2,

which lists the number of grains of each pollen taxon

counted for all samples. As this was a preliminary

assessment, pollen identifications were limited to

family or genus. Plant nomenclature follows Stace

(1997) and pollen types generally follow Bennett

(1994). No attempt has been made at this stage to be

more precise, since no type slide collection of Croatian

flora was available. The presence of micro-charcoal on

the pollen slides was also observed.

Samples for waterlogged plant remains were washed

over a 300-micron mesh sieve and the recovered plant

macrofossils were identified under a low power

binocular microscope. The results are shown in

Table 3, with nomenclature following Stace (1997).

Insect remains were extracted using the standard

method of paraffin flotation as outlined in Kenward

et al. (1980). The system for ‘scanning’ faunas follows

Kenward et al. (1985). The time taken to scan each

sample was around 20 minutes. All the taxa present

have been identified as far as was possible by

comparison to the Gorham Collection of British

Coleoptera held at the University of Birmingham.

The beetle taxa recovered are listed in Table 4. The

taxonomy used for the Coleoptera (beetles) follows

that of Lucht (1987).

Results

Bilokapica Gradina

Despite this site’s initial promise, the three samples of

sediment (BK1, BK2 and BK3 in Fig. 5) recovered

from below the hillfort at Bilokapica Gradina

contained very little pollen and no plant macrofossils

or insects. Extremely limited amounts of microscopic

charcoal fragments were recorded. It is possible that

Smith et al. The Cetina Valley, Croatia

180 Environmental Archaeology 2006 VOL 11 NO 2

Page 12: University of Birmingham Assessing the later prehistoric ...pure-oai.bham.ac.uk/ws/files/8226498/Smith_et_al._Cetina_River_Valley.pdfis around 12,000 km2 (Bonacci and Roje-Bonacci

Table 2 Palynological assessment of samples from three sites in the Cetina Valley, Croatia. Numbers of pollen grainscounted, percentages in brackets (abbreviations Mod. 5 Moderately good, A 5 possible anthropogenicindicator taxon, Occ. 5 Occasional, W 5 taxon associated with wetland)

Ruda 41?03–1?28

Ruda 51?81–1?91

Ruda 62?28–2?38

BilokapicaGradina BK4 (1)

BilokapicaGradinaBK4 (2)

BilokapicaGradinaBK4 (3) Okruglo

Total pollen counted 360 395 365 14 2 7 499

Tree taxa

Betula (birch) 2 3 1

Pinus (diploxylon) (pine) 99 (28) 19 (5) 24 (7) 3 ( z 3 wings) 5 20 (4)

Abies (fir) 12 (3) 4 2 1 wing 3 wings

Quercus (oak) 108 (30) 133 (34) 109 (30) 1 70 (14)

Carpinus (hornbeam) 5 10 (3) 4 8

Fagus (beech) 3 7 9 5

Tilia (lime) 2 2

Ulmus (elm) 1 5 12 (3) 2

Alnus (alder) 1 6 1 255 (51)

Fraxinus (ash) 7 76 (19) 71 (19) 3

Acer spp. (maple) 3

Corylus-type (hazel, bog myrtle) 20 (6) 35 (8) 37 (10) 1 12 (2)

Salix (willow) 2 12 (3) 5 1

Rhamnus (buckthorn) 1

Frangula (alder buckthorn) 2

Viburnum 1 3 1

Hedera helix L. (ivy) 1 1

Herb taxa

Cereal-type (cereals, also Glyceria, sweet grass) 3 2 1 5

Poaceae (grasses) 29 (8) 36 (9) 32 (9) 1 28 (6)

Cyperaceae (sedges) 16 (4) 15 (4) 21 (6) 32 (6)

Plantago cf. lanceolata L. (ribwortplantain) A

4 6 1

Plantago cf. major L. A 1

Asteroideae cf. Solidago virgaurea L.-type (e.g. daisy) A 6 1 1 1 5

Centaurea (knapweeds) A 1 2 1 3

Artemisia (mugworts) A 1

Achillea-type (yarrows, chamomiles) A 1 1

Lactuceae (dandelion and related Asteraceae) A 7 3 2 4

Brassicaceae (cabbage family) A 11 (3) 13 (3) 12 (3) 6

Chenopodiaceae (goosefoot family) A 1 2

Rumex spp. (docks, sorrels) A 2

Sanguisorba cf. minor Scop. (salad burnet, fodder burnet) 2 1

Cannabaceae (hemp, hop) 1

Ranunculaceae (buttercup family) 7

Fabaceae (pea family) 1 1

Caryophyllaceae (pink family) 2

Apiaceae (carrot family) 2 1 2

Heracleum (hogweed) 1

Bupleurum (hare’s ears) 1

Scrophulariaceae (figwort family) 2

Veronica spp. 1

Solonaceae (nightshade family) 1

Iridaceae (iris family) 2

Rosaceae (rose family) 1 2 5

Potentilla 1

Ericaceae (heaths) 1 1

Sparganium emersum Rehmann -type W bur reeds, lesser bulrush) 9 4 2

Filipendula (meadowsweet)W 1

Primulaceae (primrose family) W 1

Lythraceae (purple loosestrife family) W 2 1

Mentha type (mints) W 1 2

Potomagetonaceae (pond weeds) W 1 2 3

Filicales undifferentiated (ferns) 15 13 6 11 8 3

Pteridium aquilinum (L.) Kuhn (bracken) 4 1 4 1

Degraded grains/crumpled (unidentified) 45 27 12 5 1 13

Unknown 2 3 2 1

Zygnetamaceae (green algae) 2 2 2

Fungal spores/hyphae Present Present Present

Pollen concentration High High High V. low V. low V. low High

Pollen preservation Poor-mod Poor-mod Mod-good Poor V. poor V. poor Good

Charcoal rare occ rare rare occl occ

Smith et al. The Cetina Valley, Croatia

Environmental Archaeology 2006 VOL 11 NO 2 181

Page 13: University of Birmingham Assessing the later prehistoric ...pure-oai.bham.ac.uk/ws/files/8226498/Smith_et_al._Cetina_River_Valley.pdfis around 12,000 km2 (Bonacci and Roje-Bonacci

recent drainage in the area may have lowered the water

table, humifying this material. Equally, the deposits are

at the very edge of the valley floor and it may be that

calcareous ground waters have affected preservation. It

appears that this initially promising site has no further

potential for palaeoenvironmental reconstruction,

although better-preserved material may underlie col-

luvium on the south-east side of the hill-fort.

Okruglo

Pollen, plant macrofossils and insects were all well

preserved in the sample of sediment recovered from

the upper levels of the occupation horizon at the large

Bronze Age site at Okruglo. Together they indicate

that the site was covered by alder carr (Alnus cf.

glutinosa) with some buckthorn. A substantial part of

the insect fauna, such as the Dorcatoma and the

various scolytid ‘shot borers’, indicate that this fen

was full of dead and rotting wood. The ground plants

recovered are typical of wet and damp places, for

example, common nettle (Urtica dioica), crowfoot

(Ranunculus subgenus Batrachium) possible tubular

water-dropwort (Oenanthe fistulosa) and clubrush

(Bolboschoenus spp./Schoenoplectus spp.). Equally

bur-reeds (Sparganium spp.), sedges (Carex spp.),

meadowsweet (Filipendula spp.), figwort (Scrophu-

laria spp.), mints (Mentha spp) and pondweed

(Potamogetonaceae) are also present. Similarly, the

leaf beetles Donacia spp. and Plateumaris, as well as

the phalacrid and the weevil Notaris spp. suggest

stands of reeds, rushes and sedges.

The pollen suggests that the wider landscape

contained mixed oak woodland, with some pine in

places. The presence of Aphodius dung beetles

probably indicates grazing land and pasture were

also close by.

Surprisingly, given the size of the timber structures

observed in the riverbank at Okruglo and hence

importance of the site for human occupation, there is

little obvious indication of anthropogenic activity in

the pollen spectrum, the plant macrofossils or the

insect remains. There is also no microscopic charcoal.

Table 3 The plant macrofossils recovered from the Cetina River valley (Numbers of individuals: z 5 , 10; zz 5 .10but ,25; zzz .25 but less than 50; zzzz 5 .50), (Ecological codes , 5 can sometimes occur; 2 5 noparticular specific habitat;1 5 woodland; 2 5 wet places; 3 5 nitrogen rich soils; 4 5 waste places; 5 5 dampplaces; 6 5 bare ground; 7 5 grassy places; 8 5 possible cultivar)

Site Code BK4 BK4 BK4 KWW

Hab

itat

Sample Number 1 2 3 2

Sample Volume 200 ml 300 ml 250 ml 250 ml

LATIN BINOMIAL ENGLISH COMMON NAME

cf. Cupressus sp./ Juniperus sp. – fragmented femalecone

2 2 2 zzz 1 cypress/ juniper

??? Larix sp./ Pinus sp. – seed case 2 2 2 z 1 uncertain larch/ pineBetula sp. 2 2 2 z 1, ,2 birchAlnus cf. glutinosa (L.) Gaertner – seed 2 2 2 zzzz 1, 2 alderAlnus cf. glutinosa (L.) Gaertner – stalk of inflorescence 2 2 2 z 1, 2 alderQuercus cf. robur L. – complete capule z nut fragment 2 2 2 z 1 pendunculate oakUrtica dioica L. 2 2 2 z 2, 3, 4 common nettleRumex spp. 2 2 2 z 2 dockChenopodium sp. 2 z 2 2 2 goosefootRanunculus repens L./ R. acris L./ R. bulbosus L. - type 2 2 2 zz 4, 5 creeping/meadow/bulbous

buttercupRanunculus subgenus BATRACHIUM (DC.) A. Graycf.Reseda sp.

2 2 2 zzz 4, 5 crowfoot

Rubus sp. 2 z z 2 2 mignonetteOenanthe cf. fistulosa L. 2 2 2 z 4 brambleVerbena officinalis L. 2 2 2 z 2 tubular water-dropwortVitis vinifera L. – pip fragment 2 2 2 z 6, 7 vervainLamium sp./ Nepeta sp. - type 2 2 2 1 8 grapeStachys sp. - type 2 2 2 z 2 dead-nettle/ catmintHyoscyamus sp. 2 2 2 zz 2 woundwortSolanum sp. 2 z 2 2 3, 4 henbaneGRAMINEAE – Large caryopsis 2 2 2 z 2 nightshadesScirpus spp. 2 2 2 2 2 large-seeded wild grassCarex sp. – 3-sided z z z 2 4, 5 club-rush

UNIDENTIFIED – buds 2 2 2 z 4, 5 sedgeUNIDENTIFIED – bud scars (detached) 2 2 2 zzzz 1 2

UNIDENTIFIED – broad leaf fragments 2 2 2 zzzz 1 2

2 2 2 zzzz 1 2

Co

de

Smith et al. The Cetina Valley, Croatia

182 Environmental Archaeology 2006 VOL 11 NO 2

Page 14: University of Birmingham Assessing the later prehistoric ...pure-oai.bham.ac.uk/ws/files/8226498/Smith_et_al._Cetina_River_Valley.pdfis around 12,000 km2 (Bonacci and Roje-Bonacci

Given the evidence for alder carr and sedimentation

post-construction, it is probable that the upper 10 cm

of the ‘occupation horizon ‘ represents events as the

site was abandoned.

Two indicators do, however, suggest some limited

degree of human activity. From the plant macro-

fossils there is the find of a possible cultivar, a

fragment of a grape pip (Vitis sp). However, this was

incomplete and it was not possible to determine if this

was a wild or cultivated specimen. Perhaps spectacu-

larly, there is one indicator of anthropogenic activity

amongst the insect remains. This is the find of three

individuals of the granary weevil Sitophilus granarius.

This species is only associated with whole, stored grain

and is not found away from human settlement. Its

presence clearly suggests that there is some degree of

human involvement in the formation of these deposits,

even if settlement activity is limited by this time.

The pumping station at the confluence of the Ruda andCetina Rivers upstream of Trilj

Only pollen analysis was attempted on the material

from this auger core due to the small size of samples

recovered. The results from the pollen are encoura-

ging with high concentrations and a large variety of

taxa. However, preservation was variable, ranging

from good at the bottom of the profile to poor at the

Table 4 The insects recovered from Okruglo (Ecologicalcoding: a 5 aquatic; ws5 water side and reedbed; t5 woodland and trees; d5 dung; g 5

grassland; grain 5 grain; h 5 ‘house fauna’),(Estimates of numbers of individuals: z 5 1;zz 5 5; zzz 510)

Ecological coding

COLEOPTERACarabidaeNebria spp. z

Dyschiriusspp. z

Bembidion spp. zzz

?Poecilus spp. z

Pterostichus spp. zzz

Agonum spp. z wsDromius spp. z

HaliplidaeHaliplus sp. z aDytiscidae?Colelambus sp. z aGyrinidaeGryrinus spp. z aHydraenidaeHydreana spp. zz aOcthebius zz aLimnibius spp. zz aHydrophilidaeCercyon (aquatic) spp. zzz aLaccobius spp. z aHisteridaeActrius spp. z hSilphidaeSilpha spp. z

ScydmaenidaeScydmaenidae gen. & spp. indet. z

OrthoperidaeOrthoperus spp. z

StaphylindaeTrogophloeus spp. zzz wsOxtelus spp. zz

Platystethus spp. z

Stenus spp. zz

Pederus spp. z

Lathrobium spp. zz

Philonthus spp. zz

Aleocharinae gen. & spp. indet. zz

PselaphidaePselaphidae Gen and spp. indet. zz

ElateridaeElateridae Gen and spp. indet zz gHelodidaeHelodidae Gen. and spp. Indet.(?Cyphon spp.)

z a

DryopidaeDryops spp. zz wsElmis spp. zz aRiolus spp. zz aNitidulidae?Omosita spp z

SilvanidaeSilvanidae Gen. And spp. indet. z tLaemophloeus spp. z

CryptophagidaeCryptophagus spp. zz hAtomaria spp. z hPhalacridaePhalacrus caricis Sturm z wsLathridiidaeLathridius minutus (Group) zz h

Ecological coding

Corticaria sp. zz hAnobiidaeDorcatoma spp z tPtinidaePtinus fur (L.) zz hScarabaeidaeGeotrupes spp. z dOnthophagus spp. dAphodius spp. zz dChrysomelidaeDonacia spp. zz wsPlateumaris spp. z wsAltica spp. zzz T wsPhyllotreta sp. z

ScolytidaeScolytidae Gen and spp.indet (at least 5 taxa)

zzzz t

CurculionidaeApion sp. zz gSitona spp. z gLimnobaris spp. z wsNotaris spp. z wsEremotes spp. z tSitophilus granarius (L.) zz grainCeutorhynchus spp. z gRhynchaenus spp. zz tTRICOPTERAGenus and spp. Indet. zzz

Table 4 Continued

Smith et al. The Cetina Valley, Croatia

Environmental Archaeology 2006 VOL 11 NO 2 183

Page 15: University of Birmingham Assessing the later prehistoric ...pure-oai.bham.ac.uk/ws/files/8226498/Smith_et_al._Cetina_River_Valley.pdfis around 12,000 km2 (Bonacci and Roje-Bonacci

top, suggesting some degree of desiccation in the

upper part of the sedimentary sequence.

The pumping station results suggest that the

predominant vegetation at the site in all of the

sampled phases was woodland. Initially (c. 4240–3960

cal. BC), this was dominated by ash (Fraxinus – 19%)

and oak (Quercus – 30%). Ash is an under-producer

of pollen compared to oak (Andersen 1970) and

therefore probably dominated the woodland canopy.

Ash also tends to thrive on calcareous substrates, and

so was probably well suited to the local soils.

Viburnum (Viburnum spp.) is also particularly

associated with calcareous soils. In the wider area

beyond the field site, there appears to have been

mixed woodland with pine (Pinus – 7%), and fir

(Abies), as well as elm (Ulmus), beech (Fagus spp.)

and hornbeam (Carpinus). The presence of willow

(Salix) (another under-producer of pollen) suggests

some local wet woodland, probably near the river. At

the site, the canopy of the woodland must have been

quite dense, as the flowering of herbaceous plants

appears to have been somewhat suppressed despite

the range recovered. There are occasional occurrences

of pollen types often considered to be indicators of

anthropogenic activity (Behre 1986), such as mem-

bers of the cabbage family (Brassicaceae) and the

Asteraceae (daisies, dandelions, etc.), but these taxa

could also have grown in occasional natural clearings

in the canopy near to the river. Small amounts of

plantain (Plantago cf. lanceolata) could also indicate

some limited grazing activity in the valley. The cereal-

type grass pollen grains may not necessarily be from

cultivated grasses. The taxon comprises all grass

pollen ,40 microns in diameter and this includes

cereals, but also the sweet-grasses (Glyceria) that

grow by water; the state of preservation of the pollen

prevented more precise identifications.

By the time the sediments associated with the

‘Neolithic level’ (sample 4) were deposited, the nature

of the woodland at the site had changed. Ash had

declined markedly, although it was still clearly

present in the wider landscape. Oak remained one

of the major contributors to the canopy, along with

pine, which appears to have spread locally. The

woodland canopy was a little more open than it had

been earlier and a wider range of flowering herbs

is recorded. The increased representation of the

Asteraceae (daisies, dandelions etc), plus the presence

of plantains in this uppermost sample, suggest the

possibility of limited anthropogenic activity in the

area. Microscopic charcoal particles were observed to

occur rarely in the pollen preparation.

Discussion

It is clear that despite some preservation problems,

the organic silts from Sinjisko Polje have the

potential to produce detailed palaeoenvironmental

sequences that may stretch back to the Upper

Palaeolithic. Though the scale of pollen work under-

taken at the Ruda Pumping Station site was

preliminary, it is clear that there are patterns of

landscape change to be investigated and interpreted.

Further work at this site, and a range of other sites

yet to be assessed, will allow a detailed reconstruction

of the landscape and anthropogenic activity during

many of the important periods of the valley’s

prehistory. The numerous palaeochannels through-

out the Cetina Valley should contain sedimentary fills

that, although representing more limited ‘windows’

of time, will allow continuous sequences to be

‘stitched’ together (e.g. Smith et al. 2005). This is

important since the comparison between land use and

valley floor evolution between the basins is critical to

elucidating the regional economic and agricultural

strategies of the cultural groups that occupied the

valley through time.

The work at the substantial site of Okruglo

indicates clearly that the biological archive is intact

and rich. However, there are many questions

unanswered. In particular do the lower levels of the

site contain materials that relate to both living

conditions and economic activity on site rather than

after abandonment? Equally, the social and economic

relationships between this site and the possibly

contemporary sites at Dugis (Marovic 2002) and

Ruda are not clear.

Further survey and future fieldwork

The strategy followed has already shown that the

Cetina Valley has the potential to provide:

1. Pollen, plant macrofossil and insect sequences

spanning the Holocene, which are of interna-

tional importance to studies of climate change,

and vegetation succession.

2. A range of insights into the past land use of the

valley during the crucial periods of its cultural

development.

3. Insights into the development of the river and its

associated wetlands, which may have influenced

settlement patterns across the valley floor.

4. Direct information on the function, economy

and possibly living conditions associated

with the waterlogged settlements adjacent to

the river.

Smith et al. The Cetina Valley, Croatia

184 Environmental Archaeology 2006 VOL 11 NO 2

Page 16: University of Birmingham Assessing the later prehistoric ...pure-oai.bham.ac.uk/ws/files/8226498/Smith_et_al._Cetina_River_Valley.pdfis around 12,000 km2 (Bonacci and Roje-Bonacci

However, in this extensive, low-lying alluvial land-

scape, which clearly has a complex geomorphological

history, the identification and prospection of archae-

ological sites requires the development of high-

resolution landscape evolution models set within

rigorously developed chronostratigraphic frameworks

(Howard and Macklin 1999). Such an approach allows

the identification of periods of sediment erosion and

deposition and hence the potential for destruction or

burial of archaeological remains and the ‘geological

filtering’ of the known archaeological record (Bettis

and Mandel 2002). If standard methods of archae-

ological prospection are used in such landscapes in

isolation, for example, the identification of cropmarks

from aerial photographs, only a small number of

archaeological sites will be identified. In Britain, a

small number of archaeologists have demonstrated the

potential of using ‘Light Distance And Ranging’, more

commonly known as Lidar, to construct high-

resolution Digital Elevation Models of valley floors,

which allow the identification of palaeochannels and

other topographic features (e.g. earthworks) of archae-

ological interest (Challis in press). The application of

such techniques to the Cetina Valley could revolutio-

nise our knowledge of this low-lying alluvial landscape

and identify areas for further investigation. Although

no Lidar data is currently available for Cetina, the

collection of such data should be seen as a research

priority and would augment the aerial photographic

survey currently being undertaken by the project team.

To elucidate the subsurface geometry and sedi-

mentary fill of the Cetina Valley, preliminary

transects over a distance of approximately 2 km have

been undertaken in Sinjsko Polje using a GSSI

Terravision ground penetrating radar array with 14

antennae. This corridor of data, two metres wide, has

only been partially processed, but the results are

encouraging allowing the identification of further

palalaeochannels and other sedimentary features.

Clearly, the Cetina Valley is a landscape full of

archaeological promise, but much remains to be done

over the coming field seasons to elucidate fully the

remarkable cultural and environmental archaeologi-

cal record preserved in this part of the Balkans.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank our various Croatian

and Slovenian colleagues for their welcome and

hospitality both at Sinj and Ljubljana. The

University of Birmingham funded initial fieldwork in

2002. The British Academy has provided a Joint

Project with East European Academies Grant to

support project meetings (Grant number SG: 36762).

Fieldwork in 2003 was funded with a British Academy

small grant (Grant number SG: 36762). Dr

Gianfranco Morelli kindly supplied the Terravision

GPR. We are grateful to Bryony Ryder of

Birmingham Archaeology, who prepared the various

maps and illustrations. This paper was presented at the

2004 AEA conference in Bad Buchau.

ReferencesAndersen, S. T. 1970. The relative pollen productivity and pollen

representation of Northern European trees, and correction factors

for tree pollen spectra. Danmarks Geologiske Undersogelse II, 96,

1–99.

Andrew, R. 1984. A Practical Pollen Guide to the British Flora

(Technical Guide 1. Quaternary Research Association).

Cambridge: Quaternary Research Association.

Andric, M. 2001. The Holocene vegetation dynamics and the formation

of Neolithic and present-day Slovenian landscape. Documenta

Praehstorica XXVIII, 133–76.

Behre, K. E. 1986. Anthropogenic Indicators in Pollen Diagrams.

Rotterdam: Balkema.

Bennett, K. D. 1994. Annotated Catalogue of Pollen and Pteridophyte

Spores of the British Isles. Cambridge: Department of Plant

Sciences, University of Cambridge.

Bettis III, E. A. and Mandel, R. D. 2002. The effects of temporal and

spatial patterns of Holocene erosion and alluviation on the

archaeological record of the Central and Eastern Great Plains,

USA. Geoarchaeology 17 (2), 141–54.

Beug, H. J. 1961. Beitrage zu r postglazialen Floren- und

Vegetationsgeschichte in Suddalmatien: ‘Malo Jezero’ auf Mljet.

Flora 150, 600–31.

Beug, H. J. 1962. Uber die ersten anthropogenen

Vegetationsveranderungen in Suddalmatien an Hand eines

neuen Pollendiagrammes vom ‘Malo Jezero’ auf Mljet.

Veroffentlichungen des Geobotanischen Institutes, Institut ETH,

Stiftung Rubel 37, 9–15.

Beug, H. J. 1967. On the forest history of the Dalmatian Coast. Review

of Palaeobotany and Palynology 2, 271–9.

Beug, H. J. 1977. Vegetationsgeschichtliche Untersuchungen im

Kustenbereich von Istrien (Jugoslawien). Flora 166, 357–81.

Bonacci, O. and Roje-Bonacci, T. 2003. The influence of hydroelec-

trical development on the flow regime of the karstic river Cetina.

Hydrological Processes 17, 1–15.

Bonsall, C., Macklin, M. G., Anderson, D. E. and Payton, R. W. 2002.

Climate change and the adoption of agriculture in north-west

Europe. European Journal of Archaeology 5 (1), 9–23.

Bonsall, C., Macklin, M. G., Payton, R. W. and Boroneant, A. 2003.

Climate floods and river gods: environmental change and the

Meso-Neolithic transition in south-east Europe. Before Farming 3/

4(2), 1–14.

Bottema, S. 1974. Late Quaternary Vegetation History of North

Western Greece. Groningen: V.R.B. Offset drukkerji.

Bradley, R. 1998. The Passage of Arms. An Archaeological Analysis of

Prehistoric Hoard and Votive Deposits (2nd edn). Oxford: Oxbow

Books.

Brande, A. 1989. Patterns of Holocene vegetation and landscape

change in South Dalmatia. Ecologia Mediterranea 15, 45–

53.

Brown, A. G. 1992. Slope erosion and colluviation at the floodplain

edge, pp. 77–89 in Bell, M. and Boardman, J. (eds.), Past and

Present Soil Erosion: Archaeological and Geographical Perspectives

(Oxbow Monograph 22). Oxbow: Oxbow Books.

Challis, K. In press. Airborne laser altimetry in alluviated landscapes.

Archaeological Prospection 12.

Covic, B. 1987. Srednjo-dalmatinska grupa (The Middle Dalmatian

Group), pp. 442–80 in Benac, A., Praistorija Jugloslavenskih

Zemalja V, Zeljezno Doba (Prehistory of the Yugoslav Lands V.

The Iron Age). Sarajevo: The Centre for Balkan Studies.

Coles, J. M. and Coles, B. J. 1986. Sweet Track to Glastonbury: The

Somerset Levels in Prehistory. London: Thames and Hudson.

Smith et al. The Cetina Valley, Croatia

Environmental Archaeology 2006 VOL 11 NO 2 185

Page 17: University of Birmingham Assessing the later prehistoric ...pure-oai.bham.ac.uk/ws/files/8226498/Smith_et_al._Cetina_River_Valley.pdfis around 12,000 km2 (Bonacci and Roje-Bonacci

Culiberg, M. and Sercelj, A. 1991. Razlike v rezultatih raziskav

makroskopskih rastlinskih ostankov s kolisc na Ljubljanskem

barju in pelodnih analiz kot dokaz clovekovega na gozd

(Differences in the research on macroscopic plant remains from

the Ljubljana Marshes and pollen analysis evidence for human

impact on woodland). Porocilo o Raziskovanju Paleolitika,

Neolitka in Eneolitka v Sloveniji 19, 249–56.

Gardener, A. 1997. Biotic response to Early Holocene human activity:

results from palaeoenvironmental analyses of sediments form

Podpesko jezero. Porocilo o Raziskovanju Paleolitika, Neolitka in

Eneolitka v Sloveniji 24, 63–77.

Gruger, E. 1996. Vegetation change, pp. 33–43 in Chapman, J.,

Shiel, R. and Batovic, S. (eds.), The Changing Face of Dalmatia.

Archaeological and Ecological Studies in a Mediterranean

Landscape (Reports of the Research Committee of the Society

of Antiquities of London 54). Leicester: Leicester University

Press.

Gaffney, V. G. 2004. Cetina Valley, Croatia. Current World

Archaeology 3, 8–11.

Howard, A. J. and Macklin, M. G. 1999. A generic geomorphological

approach to archaeological interpretation and prospection in

British river valleys: a guide for archaeologists investigating

Holocene landscapes. Antiquity 73, 527–41.

Jahn, S. 1990. A preliminary note on human influence and the history

of vegetation in southern Dalmatia and Southern Greece, pp. 333–

40 in Bottema, S., Entjes-Nieborg, G. and van Zeist, W. (eds.),

Man’s Role in Shaping of the Eastern Mediterranean Landscape.

Rotterdam: Balkema.

Kenward, H. K., Hall, A. R. and Jones, A. K. G. 1980. A tested set of

techniques for the extraction of plant and animal macrofossils

from waterlogged archaeological deposits. Scientific Archaeology

22, 3–15.

Kenward, H. K., Engleman, C., Robertson, A. and Large, F. 1985.

Rapid scanning of urban archaeological deposits for insect

remains. Circaea 3, 163–72.

Lucht, W. H. 1987. Die Kafer Mitteleuropas (Katalog). Krefeld:

Goecke and Evers.

Marovic, I. 2002. Sojenicko naselje na Dugisu kod Otoka (Sinj)(Timber

dwellings at Dugis near Otok (Sinj)). VAHD 94, 217–63.

Marovic, I. and Covic, B. 1983. Cetinska kultura (The Cetina Culture),

pp. 91–231 in Benac, A. (ed.), Praistorija Jugoslavenskih Zemalja

IV: Bronzano Doba (Prehistory of the Yugoslav Lands IV. The

Iron Age). Sarajevo: the Centre for Balkan Studies.

Milosevic, A. 1998. Arheoloska Topografija Cetine (The Archaeological

Topography of the Cetina). Split: Muzej Hrvatskih Arheoloskih

Spomenika.

Moore, P. D., Webb, J. A. and Collinson, M. E. 1991. Pollen Analysis

(2nd edn.). Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications.

Muller, J. 1994. Das Ostadriatische Fruhneolitikum: die Impresso-Kultur

und die Neolithisierung des Adriaraumes (Prahistorische Archaologie

in Sudosteuropa 9). Berlin: Sniess-Verlag.

Sercelj, A. 1982. Pomen botanicnih raziskav na koliscih Ljubljanskega

barja (The significance of botanical research from the Ljubljana

Marshes). Porocilo o Raziskovanju Paleolitika, Neolitka in

Eneolitka v Sloveniji 9–10, 101–5.

Sercelj, A. 1996. Palynological evidence of human impact on the forests

in Slovenia, pp. 49–57 in Salbitano, F. (ed.), Human Influence on

Forest Ecosystems Development in Europe. Bologna: ESF FERN-

CNR.

Smith, D. N., Roseff, R., Bevan, L., Brown, A. G., Butler, S., Hughes,

G. and Monckton, A. 2005. Archaeological and environmental

investigations of a Late Glacial and Holocene river valley

sequence on the River Soar, at Croft, Leicestershire. The

Holocene 15, 353–37.

Stace, C. 1997. New Flora of the British Isles (2nd edn.). Cambridge:

Cambridge University Press.

Willis, K. J. 1994. The vegetation history of the Balkans. Quaternary

Science Reviews 13, 769–88.

Willis, K. 1995. The pollen-sedimentological evidence for the beginning

of agriculture in South-eastern Europe and Anatolia. Porocilo o

Raziskovanju Paleolitika, Neolitka in Eneolitka v Sloveniji 22, 9–24.

Willis, K. J. and Bennett, K. D. 1994. The Neolithic transition — fact

or fiction? Palaeoecological evidence from the Balkans. The

Holocene 4 (3), 326–30.

Smith et al. The Cetina Valley, Croatia

186 Environmental Archaeology 2006 VOL 11 NO 2