Upload
others
View
3
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
UNIVERSITI PUTRA MALAYSIA
LEADERSHIP FUNCTIONS IN MANAGING A PARENT TEACHER ASSOCIATION
ISMI ARIF BIN ISMAIL
FPP 1999 65
LEADERSHIP FUNCTIONS IN MANAGING A PARENT TEACHER ASSOCIATION
By
ISMI ARIF BIN ISMAIL
Thesi s Submitted in partial Ful f ilment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science
in the Facul ty of Educational Studies Universiti Putra Malaysia
February 1999
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
In The Name of ALLAH , The Mos t Gracious and
The Most Merc i ful , Thank You for giving me the
strength to complete thi s piece of writ ing .
Warm and s incere words of thanks to those
who are deeply and permanent ly l inked to thi s
thes i s : Yang Mul ia Dr . Raj a Ahmad Taj uddin Shah who
advi sed , a s s i s ted and guided me in becoming a
bet ter student and a better person . I also expres s
my appreciat ion to my other mentors , As soc . Prof .
Dr . Haj i Az imi Hamzah and Dr . Shamsuddin Ahmad for
their precious guidance and support . Thanks to my
lecturers at The Department Of Extens ion Educat ion
who have taught me much so that I may pas s on a
l ittle to others . My deepest appreciat ion also go
to my beloved parent s and s ibl ings ( Haj i I smail ' s
and Haj i Yacob ' s wonderful famil ies ) for thei r
a f fect ion and support .
I am eternal ly grateful to my queen of l i f e ,
Azl ina and my two princes of l i fe , Imran and Iqrnal
for being so pat ient , support ive and caring . Thi s
one i s especially for the three o f you .
i i
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . i i
LIST OF TABLES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . vi i i
LIST OF FIGURES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ix
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . x
ABSTRACT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . xi
ABSTRAK . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . xi v
CHAPTER
I INTRODUCTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
Parent Teacher As sociat ion as an Organisat ional System . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
Parent Teacher As sociation in Malaysia . . 6
The School ' s Parent Teacher As soc iat ion Const itut ion . . . . . . .......... 9
What Actually Happens to the School ' s Parent Teacher As soc iat ion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 0
Parent Teacher As sociat ion Leadership and its Role in Gaining Members part ic ipation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 6
Statement of the Problem . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 7
Research Ques t i ons . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 0
Communicat ion and Vis ion . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 0
Organisat ion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 0
Commitment 21
Management 2 1
i i i
I I
S igni f icance of the Study . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 2
Limitation o f the Study . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22
Def init ion of Terms . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22
Ex- of f icio member . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 2
Linkages . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 3
Liai son . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23
Mind-mapping . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 3
Serendipi ty . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 4
Summary o f the Chapter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 4
REVIEW OF LITERATURE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26
Parent Teacher As sociat ion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26
Organi sat ional Leadership . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28
The Nature of Leadership . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 0
Acceptance and Cohes ion . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 0
Formal Versus Informal Leaders 3 1
Condit ions for Getting Involvement 3 3
Time . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 4
Focus . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 5
Management Structure . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 6
Some Signi ficant Theories on Leadership . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 7
Type I Perspective s : The Search for Universal Leadership Traits . . . . . . . . . 38
Type II Perspectives : Leadership Styles . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 0
iv
Type I I I perspective s : Fiedler ' s Cont ingency Model . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..... 4 7
Type IV Perspectives : Behavioural Cont ingenc ies ....................... 4 9
How Leadership Funct ions i n the Management of Parent Teacher As soc iat ion . . . . . . .. . . . 5 2
A Conceptual Framework of Leadership in Parent Teacher As sociation . . . . . . ..... 5 8
Summary of the Chapter . . .. . .. . . . . . . . . . . . 59
I I I METHODOLOGy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 62
Research Design ; Why Qual itat ive ? . . . . . . . 6 3
Select ion o f the Case . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . 65
Data Col lection . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 7
Ident i f icat ion o f Informant s . . . . . . . . . 6 7
Interviews . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 6 9
Data Management . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 0
Document s and Other Sources o f Data . . . . . . 7 2
Internal Val idity . . . . . ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 2
Rel iabi l i ty . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... . . . . . . 75
Researcher as Instrument . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 6
Data Analys i s 7 8
Coding and Categories . . . . ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . 82
List of Categories and the File Folder Code . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 85
Ethics . . . . . . . ... . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 6
User General i sabil ity . . . . ..... . . . . . . . . . . . 8 8
v
IV RESULTS AND DISCUSS ION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 90
Parent Teacher As soc iat ion of the School . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 0
Profiles o f Informant s . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 2
PTA Exco Members . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 2
Teachers 9 6
Parent s . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 8
Categories . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 0 2
Creat ing a Vi sion 103
Developing a Team 121
Ut i l i s ing Organi sationwide Expert ise . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 2
Building Trust 159
Task Mot ivated Act ivitie s . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 6 4
Relat ionship Mot ivated Act ivi ties . . . . 1 6 7
Summary of the Chapter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 6 8
V SUMMARY, CONCLUS IONS AND IMPLICATIONS . . . . 1 7 2
Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 7 2
Statement o f the Problem . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 7 2
Research Que st ions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 7 3
Methodology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 175
The Ideal Hypothet ical Situat ion . . . . . 1 7 7
The Actual Situation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . '" 1 7 9
Findings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 8 2
Conclus ions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 9 7
vi
Impl icat ions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 9 8
Recommendations for Further Studies . . . '" 1 9 9
BIBLIOORAPIIY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 0 0
APPENDIX
A List of Informant s . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 0 7
B Interview Guide . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 0 8
C List o f Categories . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 0 9
D Def init ion o f Categories . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 1 1
E Audi t Trail . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 15
F Approval on the Translation Work . . . . . . . . 2 1 9
VITA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 2 0
vi i
LIST OF TABLES
Table
1 The Number of Student s Unt il
Page
June 1998 ............... . ........... 1 2 7
2 Attendance at the Parent Teacher As sociation Annual General Meeting 1996 - 1998 ......................... 1 2 8
vi i i
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure
1 Parent Teacher As sociat ion
Page
Organisational Chart . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
2 The Ohio State Leadership Model . . . . . . . 4 3
3 The Managerial Grid Leadership Model . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45
4 The Conceptual Framework Before the Study . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 61
5 The Conceptual Framework After the Study . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 171
ix
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS
AGM Annual General Meet ing
LPC Least Preferred Co -Worker Scale
PTA Parent Teacher Ass ociation
UMNO United Malay Nat ional Organisat ion
x
Abstract of the s i s presented to the Senate of Univers iti Putra Mal aysia in part ial ful f i lment
of the requi rement s for the degree of Master of Science .
LEADERSHIP FUNCTIONS IN MANAGING A PARENT TEACHER ASSOCIATION
By
ISMI ARIF BIN ISMAIL
February 1999
Chairman : Y . M Dr . Raja Ahmad Tajuddin Shah
Faculty: Educational Studies
Thi s inquiry s tudied the nature of l eader-
ship in Parent Teacher Associat ion ( PTA) and how
i t funct ions in the management of the organisat ion .
The study used qual itat ive case study as the
methodology . The informant s were PTA exco members ,
teachers and parent s . Semi - structured interviews
which were recorded act as the primary data of thi s
inquiry . Each recorded interview was transcribed
verbat im into the computer . The researcher has also
used documents provided by informant s to support
the f inding s . Data were managed us ing a personal
computer and the ' cut and paste ' method .
xi
The study found that the PTA leadership
focused more on the task related activities than
the rel ationship activit ie s . Teachers were found
to be more act ively involved than parent s . The
communicat ion between parent s and teachers was
minimal and stunted the e f f ort s of developing a PTA
which balances between carrying out various act ivi
t ie s and s imultaneously building a close knitted
relationship among members .
The s tudy concluded that (1) The PTA leader
ship failed to create e ffect ive and clear vis ion to
the members due to the l ack of focus , communicat ion
and networking , (2 ) The PTA l eadership failed to
devel op a strong team as not all members are
involved and committed to the organi sation , ( 3) The
PTA leadership did not ut i l i s e the expert ise of all
the members due to the lack of contact s among the
members , (4 ) The PTA leadership managed to build
the trust but ended being on their own in managing
the activities without act ive involvement of the
parent s , ( 5 ) The PTA leadership operates at the 5 , 5
managerial grid l eadership model as it managed to
mOderately carry out activi t ie s and maintain the
relationship among members .
xi i
Thi s study has given useful informat ion on
how leadership functions in the management of a
Parent Teacher As sociat ion .
xiii
Abstrak tes i s yang dikemukakan kepada Senat Univers i t i Putra Mal ays ia sebagai memenuhi sebahagian daripada keperluan mendapatkan
ij azah Master Sains .
FUNGSI KEPIMPINAN DI DALAM PENGURUSAN SESEBUAH PERSATUAN IBUBAPA
DAN GURU-GURU
Oleh
ISMI ARIF BIN ISMAIL
Februari 1999
Pengerusi : Y . M Dr . Raja Ahmad Tajuddin Shah
Fakulti : Pengajian Pendidikan
Kaj ian ini menyel idik kepimpinan Persatuan
Ibubapa dan Guru -guru ( PIBG ) dan bagaimana ianya
berfung s i di dalam pengurusan organisasi tersebut .
Kaj ian ini menggunakan kaedah penyel idikan
kualitat i f . Informan- informan kaj ian adalah Ahl i
j awatankuasa PIBG , guru -guru dan ibubapa . Temubual
' Semi - Structured ' ( Semi - St ruktur) yang dirakamkan
adalah sumber utama kaj ian . Set iap rakaman temubual
ditranskrib secara verbat im ke dalam komputer .
Penyel idik j uga menggunakan dokumen yang diterima
daripada informan bagi mengukuhkan dapatan . Data
xiv
diurus dengan menggunakan komputer dan kaedah ' cut
and paste ' ( potong dan tampal ) .
Kaj ian mendapat i bahawa kepimpinan PIBG ini
lebih memfokuskan kepada akt ivit i - akt ivit i tugasan
daripada aktivit i - akt ivit i yang memupukkan hubungan
sesama ahl i . Guru -guru didapati terl ibat secara
l ebih akti f daripada ibubapa . Komunikasi antara
ibubapa dan guru -guru adalah pada tahap yang
minimum dan ini memperlahankan usaha-usaha membina
PIBG yang boleh mengimbang i antara mengadakan
berbagai akt iviti dan pada masa yang sarna membina
ikatan perhubungan yang erat sesama ahl i .
Kes impul an kaj ian ini adal ah (1 ) Kepimpinan
PIBG t idak berj aya mengutarakan vis i yang j elas
dan efektif kepada ahl i - ahl i disebabkan kurangnya
fokus , komunikasi dan j aringan , (2) Kepimpinan PIBG
gagal membina pasukan yang kuat kerana t idak semua
ahl i terl ibat dan komi ted terhadap organisasi ber
kenaan , ( 3 ) Kepimpinan PIBG t idak menggunakan kepa
karan semua ahl i - ahl inya disebabkan kurangnya atau
renggangnya ' contact ' atau hubungan antara sesama
ahl i , (4) Kepimpinan PIBG bagaimanapun mendapat
kepercayaan ahl i - ahl i sehingga dibebankan sepenuh
xv
tanggungj awab menguruskan akt ivit i tanpa pengl iba
tan secara akt i f dari pihak ibubapa , ( 5 ) Kepimpinan
PIBG yang menj adi sumber kaj ian ini bergerak di
dalam grid pengurusan kepimpinan 5 , 5 atas dasar
berj aya menggerakkan akt ivi t i dan hubungan sesama
ahl i pada tahap yang sederhana .
Kaj ian ini telah memberikan maklumat yang
berguna tentang bagaimana kepimpinan berfungsi
di dal am pengurusan sesebuah Persatuan Ibubapa
Dan Guru -guru .
xvi
CHAPTER I
INTRODUCTION
As a background to the study , thi s chapter
discusses in brief the funct ions of Parent Teacher
As sociat ion ( PTA) in school as set by the Mini stry
Of Educat ion back in 19 7 3 under the PTA Rules .
Further discuss ion on i s sues rel ated to the nature
of leadership in the management of PTA highl ight s
the importance of the organisat ion to the school .
The leadership in PTA plays an important role in
helping the school to meet the society ' s needs , to
be responsive to the everchanging surrounding and
to improve the school and community relationship
( Keith and Girl ing , 1 9 9 1 ) .
School s produce educated individual s who
wil l serve the society in the future . The
knowledge taught in s chool s serves to prepare the
children to face the chall enges in l i fe . School s
therefore should be managed appropriately so that
the student s and teachers can perform to meet the
society ' s needs ( Keith and Girl ing , 19 91) . Meeting
the society ' s needs helps schools to be respons ive
to the everchanging society rather than working
1
rigidly only to satis fy the requirement s set out by
the federal , state and district educat ion depart
ment s .
In order to be respons ive , PTA need to be
run effectively to improve communicat ion and
understanding between the school and the home
( Lipham and Hoeh , 1 9 74 ) . The importance of the
s chool - communi ty concept in Malays ia was developed
in the 1 9 5 6 Razak Report ( Omardin Ashaari , 1 9 9 6 ) .
The funct ions of the school s in Malaysia have
gradual ly increased and become more complex as the
country is now being modernised and industrial ised .
The cooperat ion between both part ies i s vital in
working towards the goals of Mal aysian Philosophy
of Educat ion ( Kamarudin Kachar , 1 9 8 9 ) .
The Malaysian Philosophy of Educat ion
developed in the 1 9 7 9 Cabinet Report on the
Impl imentation Of Educat ion Pol icy is aimed at the
creat ion of wel l - rounded students who are capable
and excellent in all dimens ions. These includes
intellectual , spiritual , physical and emotional
dimens ions ( Kamarudin Hus in , 1 9 8 9 ) . The secondary
s chool in Mal aysia today , mus t theref ore understand
the National Philosophy of Educat ion and the
chang ing needs of the society .
2
In order to understand and to accomplish the
aims accordingly , principal s , teachers and parent s
need to use PTA as a forum to improve the school -
community relationship . The emphas i s on s chool-
communi ty relationship is important so that the
student s produced by school s are not only wel l
rounded but are a l s o able to adapt themselves
to serve the society ( Kamarudin Kachar, 1 9 8 9 ) .
Teachers and parent s can help educating the
student s both at school and at home . Parent Teacher
Assoc iat ion indeed manages this shared responsib i -
l i ty .
Moreover , Educat ion Mini ster , Datuk Seri
Mohd . Naj ib Tun Razak said that PTA should
represent the interest of the local community in
as sociating themselves with the local educat ion
environment ( The Sun : April 2 7 , 1 9 9 7 ) . Parent s and
teachers who are sensi t ive towards the l ocal educa -
tion i s sues should work together for the betterment
of the student s .
Parent Teacher Association as an Organisational System.
One way to des cribe an organisation i s to
view it in terms of its structure . Thi s includes
looking at who is part of the organisat ion and how
are those members related to one another . Parent
3
Teacher Associat ion as an organisat ion does have
some structural characteri stics ( Ke ith and Girl ing ,
19 91) .
In mos t American s chool s , the PTA members
normally cons ist of a principal , teachers and
parent s ( Keith and Girl ing , 1 9 9 1) . The same appl ies
in Malaysian school s . There i s al so a set of
hierarchical relationships among the members as the
Chairman i s at the top , with the Principal as
the advi ser and teachers and parents as the other
off ice bearers ( PTA Rules , 1 9 7 3) . The organisat io
nal chart on PTA can be referred on the fol lowing
page .
In real ity , PTA organisational structure in
American school s is not perfectly hierarchical .
Parent Teacher As sociat ion has important organisa
tional quirks that l ead to a more autonomy at lower
l evel s of the system ( Keith and Girl ing , 1 9 91) . The
same applies to the Malaysian context . There are
t imes when a less hierarchical mode of organisatio
nal behaviour i s proper especially in the case of
gaining cooperat ion and support of PTA members in
performing school activi t ies ( Kamarudin Kachar,
19 8 9) .
4
I Chairman ( Parent ) J
Principal as the Adviser
secretarY(Teacher) Treasurer ( Teacher)
( Parents ) ( Teachers ) Exco members Exco members Exco members Exco members Exco members Exco members
Figure 1: Parent Teacher Association Organisational Chart
Source: (PTA Rules, 1973)
5
Parent s and teachers should view their
involvement in PTA as something which they feel at
ease to part icipate instead of feeling t ied up to
the authority and responsibility which are hierar
chically structured . Parent s must not be led to
think that the relationship as j ust one aim to
direct and get material help from them ( Kamarudin
Kachar, 1 9 8 9 ) .
Contacts between teachers and parent s must
be encouraged so that both part ies wil l feel
comfortable about init iat ing communicat ion whenever
they have quest ions ( Lipham and Hoeh , 1 9 7 4 ) .
Parent Teacher Associat ion in Malaysia
The rules for establ i shing Parent Teacher
Associat ion in Malaysian school s are specif ied
in the Educat ion Act , 1 9 6 1 . The Parent Teacher
As sociat ion Rules , 1 9 7 3 clearly stated that , " There
shall be establ i shed in every ful ly assi s ted school
and educational inst itut i on an as sociat ion to be
known as the Parent Teacher As soc iation " ( Educat ion
Act , 1 9 6 1 ) as quoted in PTA Rules ( 1 9 7 3 ) .
The members should cons i s t s of all teachers
employed in the school , the parent s of the student s
6
attending the s chool and the Principal of the
school as the ex- o f f icio member ( PTA Rule s , 1 9 7 3 ) .
The aims of the associat ion as stated in PTA
Rules ( 19 7 3 ) are :
1 . To provide a forum and service for the wel fare
and progress of pup i l s in the s chool .
2 . To assist and to complement the ef fort s of the
school in meet ing the material requirement s and
needs of the student s in their act ivities .
3 . To enable the parents and teachers in the school
to exchange ideas and informat ion on educat ion
in general .
4 . To allow teachers and parent s in the school to
consult each other as to the manner of improving
the standard of educat ion of their children in
general .
The specific obj ect ive s of the as soc iation
are :
1 . To ensure that the student s in the school
obtain maximum bene f i t s from their educat ional
fac i l i t ies .
2 . To ensure that the s tudents have the neces sary
resources to do their school work ; both at home
and in the school .
7
3 . To create the opt imum school environment so as
to enable the students to develop spiritual ly ,
morally , mentally and phys ically .
The act also stated that the act ivities of
the as sociat ion should be directed to look into
the wel fare and development of the s tudent s . Thi s
means that PTA i s the body that provides the
f inancial support to help the needy student s . For
example , PTA somet imes help in paying for the
s tudent s ' examination fee , their meal at the
canteen and even buying their school uni forms . Thi s
brings together school s t a f f and parent s for the
bene f i t of the pupils ( Kamarudin Kachar, 1 9 8 9 ) .
To enable parent s and teachers to exchange
ideas and improve the standard of educat ion , PTA
also plans educat ional programmes for the student s .
Thi s i s done in the hope that the student s at
school will perform wel l in all public examinations
and enj oy an improved s tandard of l iving ( Kamarudin
Kachar , 1 9 8 9 ) .
Al though one of PTA ' s obj ectives i s to
create opt imum s chool environment , the association
nonetheless i s not connected with the employment
and condit ion of service of the school staff .
Parent Teacher As sociat i on i s only a forum to
8