Upload
trinhtram
View
222
Download
4
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
UNIVERSITI PUTRA MALAYSIA
SALAH MUAMER ABURAWE
FK 2014 65
DEVELOPMENT OF A TECHNIQUE FOR REAL-TIME LEAKAGE DETECTION AND LOCATION IN WATER DISTRIBUTION NETWORKS
© COPYRIG
HT UPM
DEVELOPMENT OF A TECHNIQUE FOR
REAL-TIME LEAKAGE DETECTION AND LOCATION IN
WATER DISTRIBUTION NETWORKS
By
SALAH MUAMER ABURAWE
Thesis Submitted to the School of Graduate Studies, Universiti Putra Malaysia,
in Fulfilment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy
March 2014
© COPYRIG
HT UPM
ii
COPYRIGHT
All material contained within the thesis, including without limitation text, logos,
icons, photographs and all other artwork, is copyright material of Universiti Putra
Malaysia unless otherwise stated. Use may be made of any material contained within
the thesis for non-commercial purposes from the copyright holder. Commercial use
of material may only be made with the express, prior, written permission of
Universiti Putra Malaysia.
Copyright © Universiti Putra Malaysia
© COPYRIG
HT UPM
iii
DDDEEEDDDIIICCCAAATTTIIIOOONNN
TTTooo MMMyyy MMMooottthhheeerrr aaannnddd MMMyyy WWWiiifffeee
© COPYRIG
HT UPM
iv
Abstract of thesis presented to the Senate of Universiti Putra Malaysia in fulfilment
of the requirement for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy
DEVELOPMENT OF A TECHNIQUE FOR
REAL-TIME LEAKAGE DETECTION AND LOCATION IN
WATER DISTRIBUTION NETWORKS
By
SALAH MUAMER ABURAWE
March 2014
Chairman: Associate Professor Abdul Rashid Bin Mohamed Shariff, PhD
Faculty: Engineering
Most water utilities worldwide suffer from the problem of water loss which effects
the financial, social and environmental concerns. Leakage in water distribution
networks is a significant issue that costs a lot, which is further complicated by the
problem that the location of the leakage is usually hidden underground. The aim of
this research was to develop a technique for real-time leakage detection and location
in water distribution networks with acceptable accuracy, able to identify its location
in the field quickly, and with reasonable cost thus encouraging its wider application.
Currently acoustic methods are commonly deployed, which requires long time to
perform, in addition to the high-cost resulting from the expensive devices and
expenses of the field survey itself. There are also some analytical methods that rely
on hydraulic analysis concept to detect the leakage. However they are unable to
determine the location of leakage accurately, as they just identify a group of hot spots
that are likely to be the location of leakage, and require to return to the field to find
the location of the leakage. The analytical methods that rely mainly on the hydraulic
modeling of the network have contributed to reducing the time needed to locate the
leakage thus reducing some fraction of the cost. A combination of hydraulic analysis
methods with geospatial technology should provide additional advantages. This
research was conducted to develop an analytical technique to locate the leakage
without the need to conduct a detailed field survey. It was done through a set of
hydraulic analysis scenarios using pressure and flow field data at specific points in
© COPYRIG
HT UPM
v
the network obtained in real-time using SCADA system. The development was
conducted through three main stages. The proposed technique was evaluated
theoretically before conducting any costly practical activity. The practical stage was
accomplished in two phases, the first phase was a laboratory study to identify the
hydraulic behaviour of the network before, during and after the leakage. The second
phase was a field work conducted using a real water network as a case study located
in Shah Alam, Selangor, Malaysia. A group of fabricated leaks were placed at
specific locations in the network, and the associated pressure changes at certain
observation points were monitored. A study of the results obtained from the practical
stage using a calibrated model was done in the application and validation stage. A
series of hydraulic analysis scenarios were applied on the hydraulic model in order to
locate the leaks which had been fabricated in the field. It was found that the results
were affected by the level of model calibration, where six leak locations were
detected out of nine leak locations fabricated in the field. This result shows the
possibility of using the developed technique to locate the leak In the case of the
availability of sufficient field data to build a high calibrated hydraulic model.
.
© COPYRIG
HT UPM
vi
Abstrak tesis yang dikemukakan kepada Senat universiti Putra Malaysia
Sebagai memenuhi keperluan untuk ljazah Doktor Falsafah
PEMBANGUNAN TEKNIK PENGESANAN KEBOCORAN DAN LOKASI
DALAM MASA NYATA UNTUK RANGKAIAN PENGAGIHAN AIR
Oleh
SALAH MUAMER ABURAWE
Mac 2014
Pengerusi: Professor Madya Abdul Rashid Bim Mohamed Shariff, PhD
Fakulti: Kejuruteraan
Banyak syarikat bekalan air dunia menghadapi masalah kehilangan air yang menyebabkan
kerugian kewangan, masalah social dan persekitaran. Kebocoran air di dalam sistem
pengagihan adalah isu serius yang dari segi kos dan lebih merumitkan keadaan apabila
kebanyakan kebocoran terlindung di bawah tanah. Objektif penyelidikan ini adalah untuk
membangunkan pendekatan secara geospatial bagi mengesan kebocoran dan lokasi di
lapangan secara masa nyata di dalam sistem pengagihan air dengan ketepatan yang boleh
diterima pakai dan kos yang murah untuk menggalakkan aplikasi sistem secara menyeluruh.
Pada masa sekarang kaedah akustik digunakan yang memerlukan masa yang lama untuk
dilaksanakan disamping kos yang tinggi ekoran dari penggunaan peralatan yang mahal dan
perbelanjaan untuk kerja-kerja pengukuran di lapangan. Terdapat juga kaedah analitik yang
bergantung kepada konsep analisis hidraulik untuk mengesan kebocoran paip. Walau
bagaimanapun ianya tidak berupaya untuk mengesan dengan tepat lokasi kebocoran di mana
ianya hanya boleh mengesan kawasan panas keberangkalian berlaku kebocoran dan
memerlukan pemeriksaan di lapangan untuk mengesan kebocoran dengan tepat. Kaedah
analitik telah menyumbang kepada pengurangan masa untuk menentukan lokasi kebocoran
yang sedikit sebanyak dapat menjimatkan kos. Kombinasi di antara kaedah analisis hidraulik
dan teknologi geospatial boleh memberikan kelebihan. Penyelidikan ini adalah untuk
membangunkan pendekatan secara analisis geospatial untuk mengesan lokasi kebocoran
tanpa memerlukan kerja-kerja pengukuran tapak yang terperinci. Ianya dilaksanakan dengan
senario analisis hidraulik menggunakan maklumat tekanan dan aliran sebenar pada lokasi
yang spesifik di dalam sistem pengagihan yang boleh didapati secara masa nyata
menggunakan sistem SCADA. Pembangunan telah dilaksanakan melalui tiga peringkat
© COPYRIG
HT UPM
vii
utama. tiga peringkat utama. Cadangan pendekatan telah dinilai secara teori sebelum
perlaksanaan secara fizikal. Peringkat praktikal dicapai dalam dua fasa dimana fasa pertama
melibatkan kajian makmal untuk mengenalpasti hidraulik sistem pengagihan sebelum,
semasa dan selepas berlaku kebocoran. Fasa kedua pula melibatkan kerja di lapangan
menggunakan sistem pengagihan yang sebenar iaitu sistem penagihan air di Shah Alam,
Selangor Malaysia. Beberapa kebocoran yang disengajakan dibuat di lokasi yang spesifik
dan perubahan tekanan akibat dari kebocoran yang berlaku direkodkan di lokasi
permerhatian yang tertentu. Satu kajian daripada keputusan yang diperolehi dari peringkat
praktikal menggunakan model ditentukur dilakukan dalam permohonan dan pengesahan
peringkat. Beberapa siri analisis hidraulik digunakan dalam model hidraulik untuk mengesan
lokasi kebocoran yang disengajakan di dalam sistem. Keputusan akhir model mendapati
ianya bergantung kepada tahap kalibrasi model dengan enam lokasi kebocoran dikesan
daripada Sembilan lokasi kebocoran yang disengajakan. Keputusan ini menunjukkan
kemungkinan menggunakan teknik yang dibangunkan untuk mengesan kebocoran Dalam hal
adanya data lapangan yang mencukupi untuk membina model hidraulik ditentukur tinggi.
© COPYRIG
HT UPM
viii
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
I wish to express my sincere thanks and appreciation to:
Faculty of Engineering, UPM
Assoc. Prof. Dr. Ahmad Rodzi Mahmud
Supervisor in the period from 23/08/2010 to 03/10/2013
Assoc. Prof. Dr. Abdul Rashid Shariff
Supervisor in the period from 03/10/2013 till the end of study
Prof. Dr. Noordin Ahmad Supervisory committee member
Prof. Dr. Thamer Ahmad Mahmud Supervisory committee member
Mahkota Research Sdn. Bhd.
Mr. Linganathan Thillainathan Chief Executive Officer
Jalur Cahaya Sdn. Bhd.
Mr. Sheikh Mazlan Bin Sheikh Hassan Chief Operation Officer
Mr. Ahmed Samhan Bin Daud Head, Pressure Management Section.
Mr. Hairi Bin Boeran Head, GIS Section
Mrs. Salwahidayah Usmani Binti Othman Head, Hydraulic Modelling Section
Mr. Roshidi Bin Roslan Executive Manager, Fieldwork Team
Mr. Mohammad Hafezullah Bin Azali NRW Specialist
Mr. Hendra Cipta Bin Ramlan NRW Specialist
Bentley Systems
Mr. Jesse Dringoli Technical Support Analyst
Mr. Akshaya Niraula Engineering Consultant
Mr. Tom Walski Senior Product Manager
Mrs. Angela Suarez Application Engineer
I would also like to express my thanks and appreciation to all who helped and
supported me to complete my PhD, especially my older brother Prof. Mukhtar
Muamer Aburawe, who encouraged me and supported me financially to continue my
study.
© COPYRIG
HT UPM
ix
I certify that an Examination Committee has met on 25 March 2014 to conduct the
final examination of Salah Muamer Aburawe on his Doctor of Philosophy thesis
entitled, "Development of A technique for Real-Time Leakage Detection and
Location in Water Distribution Networks", in accordance with the Universities
and University Colleges Act 1971 and the Constitution of the Universiti Putra
Malaysia [P.U.(A) 106] 15 March 1998. The Committee recommends that the
student be awarded the Doctor of Philosophy degree.
Members of the Thesis Examination Committee were as follows:
Desa Ahmad, PhD
Professor
Faculty of Engineering
Universiti Putra Malaysia
(Chairman)
Mohd. Amin b. Mohd. Soom, PhD
Professor
Faculty of Engineering
Universiti Putra Malaysia
(Internal Examiner)
Biswajeet Pradhan, PhD
Associate Professor
Faculty of Engineering
Universiti Putra Malaysia
(Internal Examiner)
Md. Abdul Mojid, PhD
Professor
Faculty of Agriculture and Water Management
Bangladesh Agriculture University
(External Examiner)
________________________________
NORITAH OMAR, PhD
Associate Professor and Deputy Dean
School of Graduate Studies
Universiti Putra Malaysia
Date: 21 April 2014
© COPYRIG
HT UPM
x
This thesis was submitted to the Senate of Universiti Putra Malaysia and has been
accepted as fulfilment of the requirement for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy.
The members of the Supervisory Committee were as follows:
Abdul Rashid Bin Mohamed Shariff, PhD
Associate Professor
Faculty of Engineering
Universiti Putra Malaysia
(Chairman)
Noordin Bin Ahmad, PhD
Professor
Faculty of Engineering
Universiti Putra Malaysia
(Member)
Thamer Ahmad Mahumd, PhD
Professor
Faculty of Engineering
Universiti Putra Malaysia
(Member)
________________________________
BUJANG BIN KIM HUAT, PhD
Professor and Dean
School of Graduate Studies
Universiti Putra Malaysia
Date: 21 April 2014
© COPYRIG
HT UPM
xi
© COPYRIG
HT UPM
xii
© COPYRIG
HT UPM
xiii
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
ABSTRACT iv
ABSTRAK vi
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS viii
APPROVAL ix
DECLARATION xi
LIST OF TABLES xv
LIST OF FIGURES xvi
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS xix
CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION 1
1.1 Background 1 1.2 Problem Statement 2 1.3 Research Goal and Objectives 3 1.4 Scope of the Study 3 1.5 Significance of the Study 4 1.6 Thesis Organization 4
2 LITERATURE REVIEW 5
2.1 Background 5 2.2 Non-Revenue Water (NRW) 6
2.2.1 Water Balance 6 2.2.2 Non-revenue Water Components 8 2.2.3 Water Loss Control and Reduction 8 2.2.4 Water Loss in Malaysia 9
2.3 Leakage Management and Control 14 2.3.1 Introduction 14 2.3.2 Leakage Management by District Metered Areas (DMAs) 16 2.3.3 Leakage Management by Managing Pressure 18
2.4 Leakage Detection and Location 19 2.4.1 Definitions 19 2.4.2 Current techniques for leakage detection 20 2.4.3 Inverse Transient Analysis (ITA) for Leakage Detection 24
2.5 Hydraulic Modelling 26 2.5.1 Preface 26 2.5.2 Water Distribution System Computer Modelling 26 2.5.3 Computer Network Model 27 2.5.4 Hydraulic Leakage Detection Methods 30 2.5.5 WaterGEMS Hydraulic Modelling Software System 32
2.6 SCADA System 33 2.6.1 SCADA System Functions and Components 33 2.6.2 Leakage Detection Techniques Based on the SCADA
System 34 2.7 Geospatial technology and GIS integration 35
1.7.2 GIS as a base system for integration 35 1.7.1 GIS Integration With Hydraulic Modelling Software 36
© COPYRIG
HT UPM
xiv
2.7.3 GIS Integration with the SCADA systems 36 2.7.4 GIS based water network monitoring and leakage
detection 36 2.8 Summary 38
3 METHODOLOGY 41
3.1 Introduction 41 3.1.1 Preface 41 3.1.2 Research Principle - Pressure Footprints 42 3.1.3 Systems Used 43
3.2 Theoretical Stage 46 3.2.1 Integration System 46 3.2.2 Theoretical Study 47
3.3 Practical Stage 48 3.3.1 Laboratory Study 48 3.3.2 Field Study and Network Modelling 50
3.4 Leakage Detection and Validation Stage 57 3.4.1 Non Leakage Scenario 57 3.4.2 Leakage Scenarios 57 3.4.3 Leakage Pipe Detection 57 3.4.4 Leakage Node Detection 58
4 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION 59
4.1 The Theoretical Stage 59 4.1.1 Sample Results and Discussion 59
4.2 Practical Stage 67 4.2.1 Laboratory Study Results 67 4.2.2 Field Study Results 70
4.3 Summary and Discussion 104 4.3.1 Technique Principle 104 4.3.2 Technique Procedures 104 4.3.3 Technique effectiveness and Accuracy Requirements 105
5 CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS 107
5.1 Summary 107 5.2 Conclusion 107 5.3 Challenges and Limitations 108 5.4 Scientific Contribution 109 5.5 Recommendations 109
REFERENCES 111 APPENDICES 115
I Collecting Field Data, Work Plan Work Activities 115 II Hydraulic Model Building Steps 118 III Billing Data (Selected Monthly Consumption) 122 IV Estimating Node Demands Steps 132 V Estimating Node Elevations Steps 136 VI Model Calibration Steps 138 VII Theoretical Results 148 VIII Laboratory Experiment Results 165 IX Collecting Field Data, Flow and Pressure Readings 182 X Pressure Differences Among Field Data and Modeling Results. 195
BIODATA OF STUDENT 218 LIST OF PUBLICATIONS 219
© COPYRIG
HT UPM
xv
LIST OF TABLES
Table Page
2.1 Water balance according to IWA 7
2.2 Non-revenue water percentages in Malaysian states (2002) 10
2.3 Non-revenue water percentages in Malaysian states (2008-2011) 11
2.4 Non-revenue water percentages in some Asian cities, 2004 12
2.5 Non-revenue water percentages in some countries, 2004 13
3.1 Fabricated Leaks 54
4.1 Theoretical Pressure Results at Five Selected Nodes 60
4.2 The monitoring nodes that are able to locate the leaks 97
© COPYRIG
HT UPM
xvi
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure Page
1.1 Examples of water leakage 1
1.2 The Technique for Real-time Leakage Location 3
2.1 Water burst 5
2.2 An example of typical components of NRW 8
2.3 Non-revenue water percentages in Malaysian States, 2008-2011 11
2.4 Non-revenue water percentages in some Asian cities, 2004 12
2.5 Non-revenue water percentages in some countries, 2004 13
2.6 Division of Distribution Network into DMAs 16
2.7 A Typical 24-Hour DMA Flow Profile 17
2.8 Leakage detection technology timeline 20
2.9 Manual Sounding 21
2.10 Ground Microphones 21
2.11 Leak noise Correlator 21
2.12 Acoustic Loggers 21
2.13 Digital Correlator 21
2.14 Tracer Gas Technique 22
2.15 Ground Penetrating Radar 22
2.16 Samples of the SCADA Sensors 34
2.17 Samples of the SCADA RTUs 34
3.1 Research Principle 43
3.2 A flowchart showing the Integrated System Units 44
3.3 A flowchart showing leakage detection and location procedures 45
3.4 The Integrated System 46
3.5 Network Sample for Theoretical Study 47
3.6 The designed network model with several leakage locations 49
3.7 A satellite Image of the Study Area 51
3.8 Pressure Monitoring Points (Data Logger Locations) 51
3.9 Measuring pressure before data logger installation 52
3.10 Data loggers installation 53
3.11 Data loggers after installation 53
3.12 Leakage fabricating at day-time and night-time 54
3.13 Locations of the Fabricated Leakage 55
4.1 Selected Nodes and Leakage Locations for Results Presentation 59
4.2 Pressures at Nodes in Different Scenarios 61
4.3 NeTwork Pressure Footprints (NTPFs) 62
4.4 NoDe Pressure Footprints (NDPFs) 63
4.5 Pressure Differences in the Case of Leakage at Node J-10 64
4.6 Pressure Differences in the Case of Leakage at Node J-30 65
4.7 Pressure Differences in the Case of Leakage at Node J-40 65
4.8 Pressure Differences in the Case of Leakage at Node J-50 66
© COPYRIG
HT UPM
xvii
4.9 Pressure Differences in the Case of Leakage at Node J-60 66
4.10 Pressure Behaviour with Changes of the Initial Pressure and Leakage Volume @ Leakage Location (01) 67
4.11 Pressure Behaviour with Changes of the Initial Pressure and Leakage Volume @ Leakage Location (02) 67
4.12 Pressure Behaviour with Changes of the Initial Pressure and Leakage Volume @ Leakage Location (03) 68
4.13 Pressure Behaviour with Changes of the Initial Pressure and Leakage Volume @ Leakage Location (04) 68
4.14 Pressure Behaviour with Changes of the Initial Pressure and Leakage Volume @ Leakage Location (05) 68
4.15 Pressure curves (Pressure Footprints) - Low Initial Pressure 69
4.16 Pressure curves (Pressure Footprints) - High Initial Pressure 69
4.17 Flow Readings at DMA Entrance within Field Study Period 70
4.18 Average Flow Pattern during Working Days 71
4.19 Average Flow Pattern during Holidays 71
4.20 Pressure FootPrint (PFP) at Node (J-136) During Weekdays 72
4.21 Pressure FootPrint (PFP) at Node (J-156) During Weekdays 72
4.22 Pressure FootPrint (PFP) at Node (J-147) During Weekdays 73
4.23 Pressure FootPrint (PFP) at Node (J-152) During Weekdays 73
4.24 Pressure FootPrint (PFP) at Node (J-142) During Weekdays 74
4.25 Pressure FootPrint (PFP) at Node (J-154) During Weekdays 74
4.26 Pressure FootPrint (PFP) at Node (J-140) During Weekdays 75
4.27 Average Field Flow Vs Model Flow at P-95 (No Leak Scenario) 75
4.28 Average Field HGL Vs Model HGL at J-136 (No Leak Scenario) 76
4.29 Average Field HGL Vs Model HGL at J-156 (No Leak Scenario) 76
4.30 Average Field HGL Vs Model HGL at J-147 (No Leak Scenario) 77
4.31 Average Field HGL Vs Model HGL at J-152 (No Leak Scenario) 77
4.32 Average Field HGL Vs Model HGL at J-142 (No Leak Scenario) 78
4.33 Average Field HGL Vs Model HGL at J-154 (No Leak Scenario) 78
4.34 Average Field HGL Vs Model HGL at J-140 (No Leak Scenario) 79
4.35 A comparison between field readings and modelling results for both the non-calibrated and calibrated models (Flow at P-95) 80
4.36 A comparison between field readings and modelling results for both the non-calibrated and calibrated models (HGL at J-136) 81
4.37 A comparison between field readings and modelling results for both the non-calibrated and calibrated models (HGL at J-156) 82
4.38 A comparison between the field readings and modelling results for both the non-calibrated and calibrated models (HGL at J-147) 83
4.39 A comparison between the field readings and modelling results for both the non-calibrated and calibrated models (HGL at J-152) 84
4.40 A comparison between the field readings and modelling results for both the non-calibrated and calibrated models (HGL at J-142) 85
4.41 A comparison between the field readings and modelling results for both the non-calibrated and calibrated models (HGL at J-154) 86
4.42 A comparison between the field readings and modelling results for both the non-calibrated and calibrated models (HGL at J-140) 87
© COPYRIG
HT UPM
xviii
4.43 A comparison between the field readings at leak day and modelling results using the calibrated model (Flow at P-95) 88
4.44 A comparison between the field readings at leak day and modelling results using the calibrated model (HGL at J-136) 89
4.45 A comparison between the field readings at leak day and modelling results using the calibrated model (HGL at J-156) 89
4.46 A comparison between the field readings at leak day and modelling results using the calibrated model (HGL at J-147) 90
4.47 A comparison between the field readings at leak day and modelling results using the calibrated model (HGL at J-142) 90
4.48 A comparison between the field readings at leak day and modelling results using the calibrated model (HGL at J-152) 91
4.49 A comparison between the field readings at leak day and modelling results using the calibrated model (HGL at J-154) 91
4.50 A comparison between the field readings at leak day and modelling results using the calibrated model (HGL at J-140) 92
4.51 A comparison between modelling results in case (no leak) with the modelling results (in case Leak at J-03) (HGL at J-136) 92
4.52 A comparison between the modelling results in case (no leak) with the modelling results (in case Leak at J-03) (HGL at J-156) 93
4.53 A comparison between the modelling results in case (no leak) with the modelling results (in case Leak at J-03) (HGL at J-147) 93
4.54 A comparison between the modelling results in case (no leak) with modelling results (in case Leak at J-03) (HGL at J-142) 94
4.55 A comparison between the modelling results in case (no leak) with the modelling results (in case Leak at J-03) (HGL at J-152) 94
4.56 A comparison between the modelling results in case (no leak) with the modelling results (in case Leak at J-03) (HGL at J-154) 95
4.57 A comparison between the modelling results in case (no leak) with the modelling results (in case Leak at J-03) (HGL at J-140) 95
4.58 The monitoring nodes that are able to locate leakage No. (L-01) at J-125 97
4.59 The monitoring nodes that are able to locate leakage No. (L-02) at J-97 98
4.60 The monitoring nodes that are able to locate leakage No. (L-03) at J-141 98
4.61 The monitoring nodes that are able to locate leakage No. (L-04) at J-12 99
4.62 The monitoring nodes that are able to locate leakage No. (L-05) at J-159 99
4.63 The monitoring nodes that are able to locate leakage No. (L-06) at J-100 100
4.64 The monitoring nodes that are able to locate leakage No. (L-07) at J-141 100
4.65 The monitoring nodes that are able to locate leakage No. (L-08) at J-158 101
4.66 The monitoring nodes that are able to locate leakage No. (L-09) at J-88 101
4.67 The distance difference between the correct location and the detected location of leakage (L-04) 102
4.68 The distance difference between the correct location and the detected location of leakage (L-06) 103
4.69 The distance difference between the correct location and the detected location of leakage (L-08) 103
© COPYRIG
HT UPM
xix
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS
AC Asbestos Concrete
AWWA American Water Works Association
CAD Computer Aided Design
CIS Customer Information System
DMA District Metered Area
DXF Drawing Exchange File
EPA Environmental Protection Agency
GIS Geospatial Information System
GPS Global Positioning System
HGL Hydraulic Grade Line
ITA Inverse Transient Analysis
IWA International Water Association
MNF Minimum Night Flow
NRW Non Revenue Water
NTPF Network Pressure Footprint
NDPF Node Pressure Footprint
PRV Pressure Reducing Valve
RTU Remote Telemetry Unit
SCADA Supervisory Control And Data Acquisition
UNICEF United Nations International Children's Emergency Fund
WaterGEMS Water Geospatial Engineering Modelling System
WDS Water Distribution System
WHO World Health Organization
© COPYRIG
HT UPM
1
CHAPTER 1
1. INTRODUCTION
1.1 Background
Most water utilities worldwide suffer from the problem of water loss causing significant effects not only on operational processes of the water system but also on the financial, social and environmental aspects.
Water losses can be classified to direct losses, which is the physical losses in the water system due to the loss in the amount of treated water because of the leaks in pipes, as well as the damage that may affect the facilities of water system directly, and indirect losses, which appear as economic or commercial losses (Farley et al., 2008; Pilcher et al., 2008).
Figure 1.1 Examples of water leakage
There is clearly evident that the problem of water loss is a very complex issue and has impact on water systems. In this regard, it is reported that more than 32 billion cubic meters of water are lost annually worldwide from the distribution networks because of the problem of leakage, while more than 16 billion cubic meters of water are consumed by users, either unmetered or not correctly metered because of theft and robbery (Kingdom et al., 2006).
Therefore, reducing water loss will not only increase the amount of water needed for consumption but also preserve the availability of water and protection from leakage and theft.
Water means money, it is even more valuable than that; it means life itself. So, before searching for new water resources, we should think about preserving what is available right now. Therefore, leakage in water supply networks is the most important threat facing water resources of any country, especially in countries that are already lacking water resources.
The problem of leakage in water distribution networks is a significant issue that costs a lot per year, which further complicates the problem that the location of the leakage is usually hidden underground (Gallet et al., 2012). In order to address this problem, effective techniques must be developed to detect and locate leakages in real-time so as to prevent exacerbation of the
© COPYRIG
HT UPM
2
problem. Developing a method to detect leakages is no longer the main obstacle now as there are many methods and techniques currently available and used to perform the task. The question that arises now is “Howeffectiveare these methods in solving such problem radically?”.
1.2 Problem Statement
The most important characteristics of leakage detection techniques in water systems are ease of application, cost of implementation, as well as accuracy and speed of getting results through them. Some leakage detection techniques rely on hardware and equipment to detect leaks in limited pipes, and this is usually preceded with the use of these techniques with other theoretical and analytical methods to identify some hot spots which are expected to be leakage points (Hunaidi, 2010).
Hence, researchers are still trying to find an analytical method which can be used to detect the exact location of leakage in water distribution networks. What has been reached so far is an estimation of the leakage location with error rate that is possibly related to tens of meters which are sometimes through hot spots (Bentley, 2006). The problem is exacerbated when there are leaks in more than one location in the network at the same time, as well the lack of reliability in demand data as a result of illegal consumption of water (EPA, 2010). Traditional methods of leakage detection in water distribution networks, which mostly rely on acoustic techniques are both time consuming and costly. In addition, their weakness that affects the efficiency in the use of non-metallic pipes has encouraged researchers around the world to develop analytical methods based on the high analytical capabilities of the computer to solve this problem (Puusta et al., 2010).
Based on the above argument, it is concluded that the efficiency of any method is determined by three key factors, which are, accuracy, cost and time. These factors can show the efficiency of the method and its effectiveness in carrying out the task. Therefore, the problem of leakage detection not only lies in finding a method to do that particular task, but an ideal method is characterized by better accuracy to reduce the field work required for repairing as well as reduce the current application cost due to the expenses of field devices, and get a quick alert for the presence of leakage through real-time monitoring.
Since location is the main issue, a combination of hydraulic modeling technology with geospatial techniques help to improve the accuracy and reduce the cost. Adding the SCADA system to the combination allows access to field data in real-time, which contributes to reduce the leakage detection time. Figure 1.2 shows the cycle of targeted leakage detection phases, starting from field data collection phase until maintenance phase.
© COPYRIG
HT UPM
3
Figure 1.2 The Technique for Real-time Leakage Location
In this research, an attempt was done to find an analytical technique for leakage detection in water distribution networks, to be systematically developed and validated. Furthermore there are needs to take into consideration the three key factors to ensure access to a perfect solution for aforementioned this problem.
1.3 Research Goal and Objectives
The major goal of this study was to develop and evaluate an analytical technique for real-time leakage detection in water distribution networks for more accurate results and cost saving.
Hence, the specific objectives to achieve the stated goal are as follows:
i. To develop the analytical technique for leakage detection in water distribution networks.
ii. To design the conceptual model of an integrated system that can be used to perform the task of leakage detection.
iii. To validate the developed technique by establishing real field leakage scenarios and comparing between field and simulated pressure values.
1.4 Scope of the Study
The scope of this study is limited to develop an analytical technique to detect leaks in water distribution networks. The research covers conducting laboratory experiment and establishing real field leakage scenarios to verify the designed technique. The research also demonstrates the outlines the integrated geospatial system that can be used for leakage detection based on the designed technique.
© COPYRIG
HT UPM
4
1.5 Significance of the Study
The significance of the study is that it will produce an improved technique to detect leaks in water distribution networks, which may contribute to resolve this issue in an effective manner by improving the accuracy, reducing the cost and saving the time required for locating the leakage.
The proposed technique provides the three key factors required for an effective leakage monitoring and detection, while the methods and techniques used at the present time do not meet the three key factors at once, demonstrating failure in their performance, and thus inability to provide an ideal solution to the problem.
1.6 Thesis Organization
The thesis is organized in the following manner. Chapter Two presents a literature review of the five important topics related to the research, namely, non-revenue water, leakage detection and location, hydraulic modelling, SCADA systems for monitoring and controlling and integration of geospatial technology with other related systems.
Chapter Three presents the research methodology and the stages involved in the research work, starting with the development of the target technique for leakage detection and location, proposing an integrated system to perform this technique, and conducting a laboratory experiment and field works to verify and validate the developed technique. This has been done through three main stages: theoretical stage, practical stage, leakage detection and technique validation stage.
Chapter Four discusses the results obtained in the three stages of the research work, together with their comparison and discussion.
Chapter Five is devoted to the conclusions based on the discussion of the results, as well as the recommendations for future research.
© COPYRIG
HT UPM
111
6. REFERENCES
Allen, M., Iqbal, M., Arirangarajan, S., Lim, H. B., and Whattle, A. J. 2011. Real-time in-network distribution system monitoring to improve operational efficiency. Journal – American Water Works Association
Baumberger, L., Hart, V., and Darkwah, S. 2007. Effect of GIS-Based Demand Allocation on Water Distribution System Modeling. Florida Water Resources Journal.
Beck, S., Curren, M., Sims, N., and Stanway, R. 2005. Pipeline Network Features and Leak Detection by Cross-Correlation Analysis of Reflected Waves. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering.
Bentley. 2004. The Fundamentals of SCADA. Bentley Systems, Incorporated. Bentley. 2006. Bentley WaterGEMS, Water Distribution Modeling and Management.
, Bentley Systems. Burn, S., DeSilva, D., Eiswirth, M., Hunaidi, O., Speers, A., and Thornton, J. 1999.
Pipe Leakage – Future Challenges and Solutions. Pipes Wagga Wagga, Astralia.
Charalambous, B. 2012. Advanced Pressure Management Techniques to Reduce and Control Leakage. Water Loss Detectives, Aquademica.
Christodoulou, S., Agathokleous, A., Kounoudes, A., and Milis, M. 2010. Wireless Sensor Networks for Water Loss Detection. European Water.
Colombo, A. F., Lee, P., and Karney, B. W. 2009. A selective literature review of transient-based leak detection methods. Journal of Hydro-environment Research.
Covas, D., Ramos, H., and Almeida, A. B. d. 2005. Standing Wave Difference Method for Leak Detection in Pipeline Systems. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering.
Dobriceanu, M., Bitoleanu, A., Popescu, M., Enache, S., and Subtirelu, E. 2008. SCADA System for Monitoring Water Supply Networks. WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on SYSTEMS, 7(10).
DPS_Telecom. 2008. SCADA Tutorial. EPA. 2010. Control and Mittigation of Drinking Water Losses in Distribution
Systems, US Environmental Protection Agency. Farley, M. 2001. Leakage Management and Control. World Health Organization,
Geneva, Switzerland. Farley, M. 2003. Non Revenue Water - International Best Practice For Assessment,
Monitoring and Control. 12th Annual CWWA Water, Wastewater & Solid Waste Conference, Atlantis, Paradise Island, Bahamas.
Farley, M. 2010. Are there alternatives to the DMA? Asian Water Journal. Farley, M., Wyeth, G., Ghazali, Z. B. M., Istandar, A., and Singh, S. 2008. The
Manager’s Non-Revenue Water Handbook
Finn, M. 2009. Review Draft Control and Mitigation of Drinking Water Losses in Distribution Systems. U.S. EPA Office of Ground Water and Drinking Water.
Gallet, D., Chen, A., Choi, J., and Nichols, K. 2012. Water Loss Control in The Great Lakes States : A Utility Survey Report. Center For Neighborhood Technology (CNT).
Gertler, J., Romera, J., Puig, V., and Quevedo, J. 2010. Leak Detection and Isolation in Water Distribution Networks using Principal Component Analysis and Structured Residuals. Conference on Control and Fault Tolerant Systems, IEEE, Nice, France.
GIZ, V., KIT and FHNW. 2011. Guidelines for water loss reduction.
© COPYRIG
HT UPM
112
Grise, S., Idolyantes, E., Brinton, E., Booth, B., and Zeiler, M. 2001. ArcGIS Water Utilities Data Model. Esri.
Halfawy, M. R., and Hunaidi, O. 2008. GIS-based water balance system for integrated sustainability management of water distribution assets. 60th Annual Western Canada Water and Wastewater Association Conference, Regina, Saskatchewan; 1-16.
Heeswijk, J. P. M. v. 2004. Water in asian cities, Asian Development Bank (ADB). Holnicki-Szulc, J., Kolakowski, P., and Nasher, N. 2003. Identification of Leakages
in Water Networks - Virtual Distortion Method Approach. Institute of Fundamental Technological Research, Poland.
Hua, D. T. Y. 2012. Making NRW Reduction Strategies Work in Malaysia. Asia Water 2012, S. Suruhanjaya Perkhidmatan Air Negara, ed., Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Hunaidi, O. 2010. Leakage Management for Water Distribution Infrastructure. 1, National Research Council Canada, Canada.
Hunaidi, O., and Wang, A. 2006. A new system for locating leaks in urban water distribution pipes. International Journal of Management of Environmental Quality, 17; 450-466
Hunaidi, O., Wang, A., Bracken, M., Gambino, T., and Fricke, C. 2004. Acoustic
methods for locating leaks in municipal water pipe networks. International Conference on Water Demand Management, Dead Sea, Jordan; 1-14.
Iyeswariya, A. R., Shamila, R. M., M.JayaLakshmi, K.Maharajan, and V.Sivakumar. 2012. A study on Water Leakage Detection in buried plastic pipes using Wireless Sensor Networks International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, 3(10).
Jalalkamali, A., and Eftekhari, M. 2012. Estimating Water Losses in Water Distribution Networks Using a Hybrid of GA and Neuro-Fuzzy Models. World Applied Sciences Journal.
Joshi, P., Walski, T., Gandhi, S., Andrews, J. A., and Newswanger, C. F. 2004. Case Study: Linking Bristol Babcock’s SCADA System to WaterCAD, a Water Distribution Modeling Tool. American Water Works Association DSS Conference.
Karney, Khani, Halfawy, and Hunaidi. 2009. A Simulation study on using inverse transient analysis for leak detection in water distribution networks, National Research Council Canada, Toronto, Ontario.
Khulief, Y. A., Khalifa, A., Mansour, R. B., and Habib, M. A. 2012. Acoustic Detection of Leaks in Water Pipelines Using Measurements inside Pipe. Journal of Pipeline Systems Engineering and Practice.
Kingdom, B., Liemberger, R., and Marin, P. 2006. The Challenge of Reducing Non-Revenue Water (NRW) in Developing Countries. Water Supply and Sanitation Sector Board Discussion Paper Series.
Kulshrestha, S. 2010. Expert System for Management of Water Distribution Network (WDN). International Journal of Engineering Science and Technology, 2 (12).
Lee, P. J., Lambert, M. F., Simpson, A. R., Vitkovsky, J. P., and Liggett, J. 2006. Experimental verification of the frequency response method for pipeline leak detection. Journal of Hydraulic Research.
Lee, P. J., Vitkovsky, J. P., Lambert, M. F., Simpson, A. R., and Liggett, J. 2007. Leak location in pipelines using the impulse response function. Journal of Hydraulic Research.
Li, W., Ling, W., Liu, S., Zhao, J., Liu, R., Chen, Q., Qiang, Z., and Qu, J. 2011. Development of systems for detection, early warning, and control of pipeline leakage in drinking water distribution: A case study. Journal of Environmental Sciences, 23.
© COPYRIG
HT UPM
113
Malithong, P., Gulphanich, S., and Suesut, T. 2005. Water loss Control in DMA Monitoring System Used Wireless Technology. International Conference on Control, Automation, and Systems (ICCAS2005), KINTEX, Gyeonggi-Do, Korea.
Marshall, D. D. E. a. I. W. 2010. Monitoring water distribution systems: understanding and managing sensor networks. Drinking Water Engineering and Science, 3; 107-113.
Morrison, J. 2004. Managing leakage by District Metered Areas: a practical approach. Water21, IWA.
Mpesha, W., Chaudhry, M. H., and Gassman, S. L. 2002. Leak detection in pipes by frequency response method using a step excitation. Journal of Hydraulic Research.
Mutikanga, H. E. 2012. Water Loss Management, Tools and Methods for Developing Countries Delft University of Technology, CRC Press/Balkema.
Nasirian, A., Maghrebi, M. F., and Yazdani, S. 2013. Leakage Detection in Water Distribution Network Based on a New Heuristic Genetic Algorithm Model Journal of Water Resource and Protection 5.
Nazzaretto, I. 2010. Telvent's Advanced Water Leakage detection. Telvent Solutions – Water Utilities.
Nicolini, M., Giacomello, C., and Deb, K. 2011. Calibration and Optimal Leakage Management for a Real Water Distribution Network. Journal of Water Resources Planning And Management.
Ormsbee, L., and Lingireddy, S. 2000. Calibration of Hydraulic Network Models. Water Distribution Systems Handbook, L. W. Mays, ed., The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.
Ormsbee, L. E. 2006. The History of Water Distribution Network Analysis: The Computer Age. 8th Annual Water Distribution Systems Analysis Symposium, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.
Pal, M., Dixon, N., and Flint, J. Detecting & Locating Leaks in Water Distribution Polyethylene Pipes. World Congress on Engineering, London, U.K.
Pilcher, R., Dizdar, A., Toprak, S., Angelis, E. D., Koc, A. C., Dilsiz, C., Angelis, K. D., Dikbas, F., Firat, M., and Bacanli, U. G. 2008. A Guide to the Water Loss Reduction Strategy and Application, Part 1. The Basic Water Loss Book, Erbil Project Consulting Engineering Co. LTD.
Puusta, R., Kapelanb, Z., Savicb, D. A., and Koppel, T. 2010. A review of methods for leakage management in pipe networks. Urban Water Journal.
Rico, P. 2010. Study Implementation of Advanced Technologies for the Reduction of Non-Revenue Water for the Puerto Rico Aqueduct and Sewer Authority P.-P. P. Authority, ed.
Schmid, R. 2002. Review of modelling software for piped distribution networks, Skat_foundation.
Sethaputra, S., Limanond, S., Wu, Z. Y., Thungkanapak, P., and Areekul, K. 2009. Experiences Using Water Network Analysis Modeling for Leak Localization. Bentley Systems.
Shamsi, U. M. 2005. GIS Applications for Water, Wastewater and Stormwater Systems, Taylor & Francis Group.
Silva, D. D., Mashford, J., and Burn, S. 2009. Computer Aided Leak Location and Sizing in Pipe Networks. 17, Urban Water Security Research Alliance
Silva, D. D., Mashford, J., and Burn, S. 2011. Computer Aided Leak Location and Sizing in Pipe Networks. 17, Urban Water Security Research Alliance.
Trammel, D. 2004. Creating a Hydraulic Model from a ArcSDE Geodatabase. T. water, ed., Arizona, USA.
Vítkovský, J. P., Lambert, M. F., Angus R. Simpson, M. A., and Liggett, J. A. 2007. Experimental Observation and Analysis of Inverse Transients for Pipeline Leak Detection. Journal of Water Resources Planning And Management.
© COPYRIG
HT UPM
114
Walski, T. M., Chase, D. V., Savic, D. A., Grayman, W., Beckwith, S., and Koelle, E. 2003. Advanced Water Distribution Modeling and Management, Bentley Institute Press.
Wang, X.-J., Lambert, M. F., Simpson, A. R., Liggett, J. A., and Vıtkovsky, J. P. 2002. Leak Detection in Pipelines using the Damping of Fluid Transients. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering.
Wikipedia. 2012. Non-revenue water. Wikipedia. Winarni, W. 2009. Infrastructure Leakage Index (ILI) as Water Losses Indicator. Civil
Engineering Dimension, 11. WRc. 1980. Leakage Control Policy and Practice. 26, UK Water Authorities
Association. Wu, Z. Y. 2009. Innovative Optimization Model for Water Distribution Leakage
Detection. Bentley Systems. Wu, Z. Y. 2012. Roles of Advanced Information Technology in Water Loss
Management. Applied Research, Bentley Systems, Incorporated, Watertown, CT, USA
Wu, Z. Y., Arniella, E. F., and Gianella, E. 2004. Darwin Calibrator - Improving Project Productivity and Model Quality for Large Water Systems. Journal - American Water Works Association
Wu, Z. Y., and Sage, P. 2006. Water Loss Detection Via Genetic Algorithm Optimization-based Model Calibration. ASCE 8th Annual International Symposium on Water Distribution System Ananlysis, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.