42
RISK ASSESSMENT AND MANAGEMENT

Unit 5 risk assessment and management

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Unit 5 risk assessment and management

RISK ASSESSMENT AND

MANAGEMENT

Page 2: Unit 5 risk assessment and management

Introduction

Any industrial activity involves some risk or hazard in terms of fire, explosion, toxic releases etc. which lead to injuries, loss of life & property ultimately adversely affecting the environment as a whole if not managed correctly resulting

Truly speaking, any industrial installation should have Zero risk situation, but, it is impossible to achieve it.

Page 3: Unit 5 risk assessment and management

The potential causes for accidents are:

Increasing production.Storage Volume.Competitive technology.Use of hazardous substances.

Page 4: Unit 5 risk assessment and management

Risk Assessment & Risk Management gives a framework for :

• Setting regulatory priorities • Decision Making

that cut across various environmental areas.

Page 5: Unit 5 risk assessment and management

“Environmental Risk Assessment” may be broadly defined as a scientific enterprise in which facts and assumptions are used to estimate the adverse effects on human health or the environment that may result from exposures to specific pollutants or other toxic agents.

Page 6: Unit 5 risk assessment and management

“Environmental Risk Management” refers to a decision making process involving risk assessment, technological feasibility, economic information about cost and benefits, statutory requirements, public concerns etc.

“ Risk Communication” is the exchange of information about risk.

Page 7: Unit 5 risk assessment and management

RISK ASSESSMENT :

It is the systematic examination of an actual or proposed industrial installation:

(1) to identify potential hazard to occur

&

(2) to identify the possible consequences from these hazards which would assist in decision making for reducing risk to an acceptable level.

Page 8: Unit 5 risk assessment and management

ALARP:

Mgmt. must take all measures to

reduce risks as low as reasonably practicable. (ALARP) and this is achieved through a technique called “Risk Assessment or Risk Analysis”.

Page 9: Unit 5 risk assessment and management

What is Hazard?

It is the property of a substance or a situation which has the potential to cause harm.

The potential hazards can be of fire, explosion and release of toxic & harmful gases.

Page 10: Unit 5 risk assessment and management

HAZARDBy hazard we mean any physical activity, situation or condition with the potential to cause harm, like:

•Human injury or death• Damage to the environment •Damage to physical assets•Loss of production

The words “threat” and “danger” are sometimes used with a similar meaning as hazard.

Page 11: Unit 5 risk assessment and management

Hazard Categories

Hazards may generally be classified as:1. Natural hazards (e.g., Flooding, earthquake, storm, lightning).2. Technological hazards (e.g., industrial facilities, structures, technical equipment, transportation systems, consumer products, pesticides, herbicides, pharmaceuticals).3. Societal hazards (e.g., assault, war, arson, terrorism,sabotage, communicable disease).4.

Page 12: Unit 5 risk assessment and management

What is Risk?

It is related to the consequences of identified hazard. It may also be defined as the unwanted consequences from a particular activity. Risk has two variables:(a) Magnitude of consequences(b) Probability or frequency of the occurrence. So, Risk = Frequency of the occurrence ×

Magnitude of consequences

Page 13: Unit 5 risk assessment and management

What Is Risk?An expectation of lossAlways an element of uncertaintyAlways refers to futureUsually covers both severity and likelihood of a lossUsually refers to unwanted consequences

Page 14: Unit 5 risk assessment and management

The consequences of an accident may be classified in different categories, as

1. Personnel consequences

Fatalities

Impairment

2. Environmental damage

3. Economic loss

Damage to material assets

Production/service loss

4. Information loss

5. Image loss(i.e., damage to reputation)

Page 15: Unit 5 risk assessment and management

Why Risk Assessment (Objectives of RA):

(1) To prioritize safety investments : All organizations have limited resources. Risk assessment can be used to prioritize risks and ensure that investment is directed to the greatest risks.

(2) Risk estimates aids in decision making.

(3) Corporate Mgmt develops positive public relations with employees, community and the Govt.

Page 16: Unit 5 risk assessment and management

RISK EVALUATION:

There are four steps in the evaluation of a risk.

(1) Hazard Identification

(2) Exposure Assessment

(3) Hazard Assessment

(4) Risk Characterization

Page 17: Unit 5 risk assessment and management

(1) HAZARD IDENTIFICATION: It is an analysis to determine which of the discharges from a process or an accidental release will be a potential danger to public health. E.g. Chemicals such as CO, HCl and unburned organics would be established as potential sources of risk for an incinerator.

The means of identifying hazard is complex.

Various methods are used to collect and evaluate toxic properties ( properties that indicate the potential to cause biological injury, disease or death under certain exposure conditions).

Page 18: Unit 5 risk assessment and management

HAZARD IDENTIFICATION:(Cont…..)

Methods:(1) EPI-DEMIOLOGICAL STUDY: Use of “epidemiological” studies deal with the incidence of disease among groups of people.

The study attempts to correlate incidence of disease like cancer from an emission by evaluation of people with a particular disease and people without the disease.

Page 19: Unit 5 risk assessment and management

HAZARD IDENTIFICATION: (Cont…..)

Methods:(2) BIOASSAY: Long –term animal “bioassays” ( an evaluation of disease in a laboratory animal) is a very common method for hazard identification. e.g. Increased tumor incidence in laboratory animals is the primary health effect considered in animal bioassay. Exposure testing for a major portion of an animal’s lifetime (2 -3 years for rats and mice) provides information on disease susceptibility, primarily for carcinogenicity ( the development of cancer).

Page 20: Unit 5 risk assessment and management

(2) EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT:

This determines how much of an emission actually reaches the receptor. Human exposure includes ingestion (eating or drinking), dermal contact ( contact with the skin) & inhalation.

These means of exposure are pathways to the human body. Thus, there is no risk without exposure.

The exposure assessment attempts to define the route, amount, frequency and duration of exposure of a given population to a toxic substance. The principal pathways of exposure generally considered in exposure assessment are atmospheric transport, surface and ground water transport, ingestion of food materials etc.

Page 21: Unit 5 risk assessment and management

(2) HAZARD ASSESSMENT : A hazard assessment is a determination of the relationship between the amount of exposure and the risk to public health.

A person can drown in water, but that does not mean that a glass of water is a danger to health. Obviously, what defines a danger is not necessarily the presence of a particular chemical but rather the amount of that substance one is exposed to. This amount is called “dose”.

Page 22: Unit 5 risk assessment and management

HAZARD ASSESSMENT : (Cont…..)

Hazard assessment is also referred to as “Dose – response assessment”.

Dose is usually expressed as milligrams of chemical received per kilogram of body weight per day.

For toxic substances other than carcinogens, a threshold dose must be exceeded before a health effect will occur. For many substances, there is a dosage level below which there is no harm. However, at some given dosage, the threshold, a health effect will occur ( or, at least be detected).

Page 23: Unit 5 risk assessment and management

(4) RISK CHARACTERIZATION:

It estimates the health risk associated with the process under investigation.

This characterization gives a number that represents the probability of adverse health effects from that process or from a substance released in that process.

Page 24: Unit 5 risk assessment and management

RISK CHARACTERIZATION:(Cont…)

Once a risk characterization is made, the meaning of that risk must be evaluated.

Public health agencies generally only consider “risk” greater than 10 in 1 million to be significant risks warranting action.

Page 25: Unit 5 risk assessment and management

MEASURE OF RISK

Though the risks to the people from industrial hazards may be in the form of injuries , exposure to harmful releases etc., risks are generally measured in terms of deaths (since there is better accuracy in data pertaining to death).

Risks are generally expressed as

(1) Individual risks

(2) Societal risks.

Page 26: Unit 5 risk assessment and management

(1) Individual Risk ( IR) :This is the risk to an individual

person. It is the probability of death occurring as a result of an accident at plant or an installation or a transport route.

A simple way to express an IR is the “FATAL ACCIDENT RATE” (FAR).

Page 27: Unit 5 risk assessment and management

Individual Risk ( IR) : (Cont……) “FATAL ACCIDENT RATE” (FAR) is

the number of fatalities per 108 exposed hours.

One person works on average = 7.5 hrs /day

One person works on average= 7.5×5= 37.5hrs/wk

One person works on average = 37.5×52wks(yr) = 1950 hrs/year ( Say, 2000 hrs.)

Thus, 1000 persons in lifetime (50 yrs) would work = 1000×50×2000 = 100000000 i.e. 108 exposed hrs.

“Exposed hours is the mean hrs. at work”

Page 28: Unit 5 risk assessment and management

Individual Risk ( IR) : (Cont……) “FATAL ACCIDENT RATE” (FAR)

typically varies in the range of 1 - 30.

FAR of 1 means one fatal accident over 1000 working lifetimes

or,

One fatal accident per 50 yrs. For a site employing 1000 people.

Page 29: Unit 5 risk assessment and management

RISK CHARACTERIZATION:(Cont…)

(2) Population Risk (PR) :This is also known as “group risk” from

an activity.

It is the relationship between frequency of an accident and total number of people harmed.

The is often plotted as FN curve showing the cumulative frequency (F) of accidents and Number of fatalities( N).

Page 30: Unit 5 risk assessment and management

1.To prioritize safety investment (All organizations have limited resources. RA can be used to prioritize risks and ensure that investments is directed to the greatest risks).

2. To make planning & decision especially for areas like plant design, plant safety reviews, preparation of emergency / disaster plan etc.

3. To estimate financial risks.

4. To develop positive public relations with employees, community and the Govt.

5. To get approval of projects.

Objectives of Risk Assessment

Page 31: Unit 5 risk assessment and management

6. To compare the estimated individual & societal risks against acceptance criteria.

7. To identify major risk contributors and to recommend remedial measures for risk reduction.

8. To carry out cost – benefit analysis for the implementation of the remedial measures.

9. To address land use planning issues including suitability of location, layout and design.

10. To develop appropriate contingency plan.

Objectives of Risk Assessment (Cont…)

Page 32: Unit 5 risk assessment and management

What is Maximum Credible Accident (MCA) Analysis?It is a tool used to find the maximum potential damage an accident can cause.

It helps in the identification of most vulnerable sections of the installation and facilities that pose maximum possible risk if the hazardous materials are released as a result of a failure. This may be due to leakage from a crack or fracture of the process vessel, vents, pump seals or overflow of a tank or vessel.

Page 33: Unit 5 risk assessment and management

What is Maximum Credible Accident (MCA) Analysis? ( Cont….)The extent of consequences arising from the hazardous substances will largely depend on quantity released, location, wind condition and density of population.

Page 34: Unit 5 risk assessment and management

Risk Management & Control

After assessing the risks , one recognizes the courses of actions that would control and minimize the risks to human health, property and environment ( objective of Risk Mgmt.)

Risk Mgmt. involves resource allocation, cost – benefit analysis, acceptable risks etc.

Page 35: Unit 5 risk assessment and management

Risk Management & Control ( Cont….)

Risk Mgmt. involves:

(1) Reduction of risks to acceptable limits by judicious investments.

(2) Relocating the activities on alternate sites / routes

(3) Taking appropriate considerations when buying “Insurance Policy” of installations with potential high risks.

(4) Preparing Emergency / Disaster plans to handle effectively any emergency situations with minimum damages.

Page 36: Unit 5 risk assessment and management

Risk Management & Control ( Cont….)

Effective Risk Mgmt. Depends on:(1) Sound standards of engineering design

must be used.

(2) Quality control procedures must ensure that all equipment conforms to design standards and specifications.

(3) All equipment must be inspected, maintained and tested at suitable intervals.

(4) Personnel must be experienced and trained.

Page 37: Unit 5 risk assessment and management

Risk Acceptance / Tolerance

The result of a risk assessment is a quantification of risk.

It brings the level of risk that is acceptable to public, authorities & the industry. But, the question is how much risk can be acceptable or tolerable.

The risk from an activity should be judged against the benefits from the activity, since no activity can claim to be totally risk free.

Page 38: Unit 5 risk assessment and management

Risk Acceptance Criteria:

Since all industrial activities involve risks including risks of fatality ( may be employees engaged in the activity or, common public outside).

When an industrial activity imposes risk common public, it especially becomes the concern of regulators to assess the risk & evaluate it.

Page 39: Unit 5 risk assessment and management

Risk Acceptance Criteria: (Cont……)

A good risk criteria should recognize:(1) Level of risk which is so high that it is

considered unacceptable/ intolerable regardless of the benefits derived from the activity.

(2) Level of risk which is low enough to be considered negligible.

(3) Level of risk in between that is to be considered tolerable subject to their being reduced to “As Low As is Reasonably Practicable” (ALARP).

Risks become tolerable when all practicable measures are taken to reduce risk to ALARP.

Page 40: Unit 5 risk assessment and management

Risk Assessment Matrix

Risk Assessment Matrix is a tool for ranking different activities / projects in terms of their potential benefit and the likely risks/cost in implementing them.

It is a tool that standardizes qualitative risk assessment and facilitates the categorization of risk from threats to health, safety, environment and company reputation.I

Page 41: Unit 5 risk assessment and management

Risk Assessment Matrix (Cont…..)

I

Likelihood Consequences

Catastrophic (5)

Major (4)

Moderate(3)

Minor(2)

Insignificant(1)

Almost Certain (5)

10 9 8 7 6

Likely (4) 9 8 7 6 5

Possible (3) 8 7 6 5 4

Unlikely (2) 7 6 5 4 3

Rare (1) 6 5 4 3 2

Page 42: Unit 5 risk assessment and management

Risk Assessment Matrix (Cont…..)

IRisk Score

Risk Description What should be done?

9 - 10 Extreme Immediate action required

7 - 8 High Action plan required, senior mgmt. attention

needed

5 - 6 Moderate Specific monitoring or procedures required,

mgmt. responsibility must be specified

2 - 4 Low Manage through routine procedures