51
1 Unfolding Methods Alberto Rotondi Università di Pavia

Unfolding Methods

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    7

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Unfolding Methods

1

Unfolding Methods

Alberto RotondiUniversità di Pavia

Page 2: Unfolding Methods

Folding is a common process in physics

2

signal Apparatusresponse

Observed signal

xyxxfygyxxf d),()()(),()(

x

Page 3: Unfolding Methods

Convolution is a linear folding

3

signal Apparatusresponse

Observed signal

xxyxfygxyxf

xzyxyz

d)()()()()(

x

Page 4: Unfolding Methods

4

Page 5: Unfolding Methods

5

auxiliary variable

The jacobian is

From the general theorem one obtains

by integrating on the auxiliary variable

hence

which is the probability density

Foldingtheorem

Page 6: Unfolding Methods

6

Convolutiontheorem

For independent variables:

when Z is given by the sum

we have

and we obtain

When X1 and X2 are independent, we obtain the convolution integral

In physics

( instrument function, f signal)

Page 7: Unfolding Methods

7

Uniform*GaussianWhen where

one has immediately

Page 8: Unfolding Methods

8

values

= R* +

1D Unfolding

Page 9: Unfolding Methods

9

2D Unfolding

Page 10: Unfolding Methods

10

Fourier Techniques

Page 11: Unfolding Methods

11

Image Deconvolution

Page 12: Unfolding Methods

12

original

Poissonstatistics

Gaussiansmearing

Fourier(un)restored

Page 13: Unfolding Methods

13

original Poissonstatistics

Gaussiansmearing

Fourierrestored

Page 14: Unfolding Methods

14

original

Poissonstatistics

Gaussiansmearing

Fourier(un)restored

Page 15: Unfolding Methods

15

original Poissonstatistics

Gaussiansmearing

Fourierrestored

Page 16: Unfolding Methods

16

original

Poissonstatistics

Gaussiansmearing

Fourier(un)restored

Page 17: Unfolding Methods

17

La PET: tomografia a positroniPET: positron emission thomography

Page 18: Unfolding Methods

18

Page 19: Unfolding Methods

19

Imagerestoration

Page 20: Unfolding Methods

20

Explanation:

The smeared distributions of two input distributions cannot be distinguished if they agree on a large scale of x but differ byoscillations on a “microscopic” scale much smaller than the experimental resolution

or

to increase the DoF by using

a parametric model

)'|()()|( PPP

Page 21: Unfolding Methods

21

1)(P

The frequentistassumes

Page 22: Unfolding Methods

22

Regularizationterms

Page 23: Unfolding Methods

23

What isMaxEnt ???

Page 24: Unfolding Methods

24

The iterative principle

)

(26)

Page 25: Unfolding Methods

25

The iterative Principlewithoutbest fit

Good!

Page 26: Unfolding Methods

26

The iterative Principlewithoutbest fit +smoothing

Page 27: Unfolding Methods

27

The iterative Principlewithoutbest fit

Bad!

Page 28: Unfolding Methods

28

The iterative algorithm +best fit

Page 29: Unfolding Methods

29

The iterative algorithm +Best fit

Page 30: Unfolding Methods

30

The iterative algorithm +best fit +regularization

Page 31: Unfolding Methods

31

The iterative algorithm +best fit +MaxEntregularization

Page 32: Unfolding Methods

32

The iterative algorithm +best fit +Tichonovregularization

Page 33: Unfolding Methods

33

The iterative algorithm +best fit +Tichonovregularization

Page 34: Unfolding Methods

34

The iterative algorithm +best fit +Tichonovregularization

Page 35: Unfolding Methods

35

ATHENA experimental set-upATHENA apparatus

Silicon micro

strips

CsI

crystals

511 keV

511 keV

Charged tracks to reconstruct antiproton

annihilation vertex.

Identify 511 keV photons from e+-e-

annihilations.

Identify space and time coincidence of the

two with ± 5 mm and 5 s resolution

(Probability of a random coincidence:

0.6% per pbar annihilation without

considering detection efficiency)

Page 36: Unfolding Methods

36

From the ATHENA detector

Pbar-only (with electrons)

x

y

cm

Page 37: Unfolding Methods

37

antihydrogen !!!!!!!!!! FIRST COLD ANTIHYDROGEN PRODUCTION & DETECTION (2002)M. Amoretti et al., Nature 419 (2002) 456M. Amoretti et al., Phys. Lett. B 578 (2004) 23

SIGNAL ANALYSIS:

opening anglexy vertex distribution

radial vertex distribution

65 % +/- 10% of annihilations

are due to antihydrogen

between 2002 & 2004 more than 2 millionsantihydrogen atomshave been produced

that’s about 2 x 10-15 mg.. or .. 1000 Giga years for a gram

8110

80;5.6

190

80;7.4

110190

80

Page 38: Unfolding Methods

38

Cold Mix dataHbar (MC) BCKG

(HotMixData)

Pbar vertex XY projection (cm)

x = 0.65 ± 0.05

x Hbar + (1-x) BCKG = Cold Mix

Hbar percentage

Annihilation vertex in the trap x-y plane

ML Fit Result

Page 39: Unfolding Methods

39

The vertex algorithm resolution function is gaussian with

mm3

The 2D deconvolution revealstwo different annihilation modes

Cold Mix

exp background

Cold Mix dataIteratve best fit method

Page 40: Unfolding Methods

40

The iterative algorithms +best fit + regularization

• iterative algorithms are used in unfolding (ill posed) problems

• they need a Bayesian regularization term

• when there are degrees of freedom,onecan use a best fit of a signal+background function to the data

• in this case there are no Bayesian terms(pure frequentist approach)

Page 41: Unfolding Methods

41

end

Page 42: Unfolding Methods

42

Page 43: Unfolding Methods

43

Regularizationparameter

Page 44: Unfolding Methods

44

Page 45: Unfolding Methods

45

Page 46: Unfolding Methods

46

Conclusions• best fit minimization methods are crucial in physics. They are mainly frequentist

• they are based on the ML and LS algorithms (they are implemented in the ROOT-MINUIT framework)

• to judge the quality of the result,frequentists use the testbayesians use the hypothesis probability

• Bayesian a priori hypotheses should be used withinformative priors!!!

Page 47: Unfolding Methods

47

Imagerestoration

Page 48: Unfolding Methods

48

2D Unfolding

Page 49: Unfolding Methods

49

The iterative principle

Page 50: Unfolding Methods

50

Page 51: Unfolding Methods

51

Unfolding techniques

Statistica III