Upload
zelda-rutledge
View
26
Download
4
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Session 1 Guidelines for projects under Article 6 of the Kyoto Protocol First UNFCCC workshop on implementation of Article 6 projects under the Kyoto Protocol Moscow 26-27 May 2004. www.unfccc.int UNFCCC secretariat. Overview. What is JI? Why two tracks for JI? - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
www.unfccc.intUNFCCC secretariat
Session 1Guidelines for projects under Article 6 of the Kyoto Protocol
First UNFCCC workshop on implementationof Article 6 projects under the Kyoto Protocol
Moscow26-27 May 2004
Overview
What is JI?
Why two tracks for JI?
What characterizes track 1 and track 2?
Cooperative mechanisms
Kyoto Protocol Art. 6, 12 and 17
3 Mechanisms
CDM JI ET
project based System with GHG emission limitations
Convention(Art. 3.3, 4.2 (cooperate, jointly)) AIJ under the
pilot phase
What is JI?• Emission reductions (ERU) are achieved by one Annex
Party through projects in another such Party.
• These project based investments shall provide emission reductions, or an enhancement of removals by sinks, that are additional to any that would otherwise occur.
• Projects starting as of year 2000 are eligible as Article 6 projects if they meet requirements of guidelines. ERUs shall only be issued for crediting period after the beginning of year 2008.
• ERUs bankable to a max of 2.5% of assigned amount pursuant to art. 3.7 & 3.8 of that Party (art.7.4);
• Art. 6 LULUCF projects = Art. 3.3 and 3.4;
• Legal entities to be authorized by Parties
Why two tracks for JI?
• Two “worlds” :
Party meets AIP participation requirements for emissions trading (Art. 17) -> use of national JI requirements (Track 1: “ET like”)
Party does not meet such requirements -> obligation to use “verification procedure” with international oversight (Track 2: “CDM like”)
A Party eligible to follow Track 1 may elect to use the verification procedure under of Track 2.
More detail on eligibility criteria in next session 4
What characterizes track 1 and track 2?Track 1 Track 2
Project design (baseline/ monitoring plan)
National guidelines Supervisory Committee(take into account work by CDM/EB)
Check project design against requirements
National guidelines (option to use Track 2)
Verification by AIE
Check performance of project
National guidelines (option to use track 2)
Verification by accredited AIE
Transfer • OK if Party meets requirements
• In addition if track 2 option used: ERUs exempted from CPR limitations
• Only if the Party is in compliance with eligibility requirements (para 21, a, b & d)
• These ERUs are exempt from CPR limitations
Track 1• Key role for host Party
– Have designated focal point for approving projects– Have determined national guidelines for:
• Approving projects• Monitoring • Verification
– Shall make directly or through secretariat information on projects publicly available
– Meet participation requirements
• No international guidelines regarding approving projects, baseline defintion, monitoring, verification etc.
Track 2Key role for international oversight • By A6SC:
– Accredit independent enties (AIE)– Determine:
•Baseline and monitoring methodologies•Verification
– Request review of decision of AIE• By AIE:
– Determination Art. 6 projects– Determination of emission reductions
Track 2 – Determination requirements
AIE to check whether project design: – Has been approved by Parties involved;– Emission additionality: would not have
occurred in the absence of the project; – Baseline and monitoring plan in
accordance with Art. 6 guidelines (Appendix B);
– Analysis of environmental impacts.
Art. 6 project activity cycle
PP=project participants; AIE= accredited independent entityA6SC= article 6 supervisory committeeERU= emission reduction unit
0 Any private or public body that has been accredited by A6SC and designated by COP/MOP * An automatic step unless a review is requested within 60 days by one Party involved or three A6SC members** An automatic step unless a review is requested within 15 days by one Party involved or three A6SC members
Ex0
A6SC&COP/MOP
AIE
Accreditation/Designation
Determination
Monitoring
Determination
Design
A6SC*
A6SC**
ERU
AIE
PP
AIE
PP
Track 2- How does accreditation work?
Ex
A6SC
AIEx
Accreditation
VERIFICATION PDD
VERIFICATION ERUs
List of accredited independent entities (AIE)
Track 2 - Verification procedure
PPSubmits project design doc.
Rejects if not conform with criteria
AIEx
AIEx= Accredited independent entity
Criteria for baselines, monitoring and crediting lifetime (Appendix B)
Project implementation
PP
DataURF
AIEx
A6SC= Article 6 Supervisory Committee
Determination made public through UNFCCC secr.
PDD made public - comments within 30 days by Parties, stakeholders or UNFCCC accredited NGOs
Automatic within 45 days
Unless review by A6SC is requested by a Party involved or 3 of A6SC
members
Determination on verified ERUs made public
through UNFCCC secr.Unless review by A6SC is requested by a Party involved or 3 of A6SC
members Automatic within 15 days
Concluding remarks• Framework• Work to define the detail of national guidelines• Work to define the detail of track 2 guidelines of
procedures.• Experience of CDM -> also specific work
– Meth LULUCF other than afforestation and reforestion
– Accreditation– Issuance and transfer of ERU– Development of URF