18
UNEP-GEF DEMONSTRATION PROJECTS ON IMPLEMENTATION OF NATIONAL BIOSAFETY FRAMEWORKS Arhus GMO Working Group 24 March 2004 24 March 2004

UNEP-GEF DEMONSTRATION PROJECTS ON IMPLEMENTATION OF NATIONAL BIOSAFETY FRAMEWORKS Arhus GMO Working Group 24 March 2004

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: UNEP-GEF DEMONSTRATION PROJECTS ON IMPLEMENTATION OF NATIONAL BIOSAFETY FRAMEWORKS Arhus GMO Working Group 24 March 2004

UNEP-GEF DEMONSTRATION PROJECTS ON

IMPLEMENTATION OF NATIONAL BIOSAFETY FRAMEWORKS

Arhus GMO Working Group 24 March 2004 24 March 2004

Page 2: UNEP-GEF DEMONSTRATION PROJECTS ON IMPLEMENTATION OF NATIONAL BIOSAFETY FRAMEWORKS Arhus GMO Working Group 24 March 2004

Article 2 of the Biosafety Protocol:

“………Each Party shall take necessary and appropriate legal, administrative and other measures to implement its obligations under this Protocol…….”

Page 3: UNEP-GEF DEMONSTRATION PROJECTS ON IMPLEMENTATION OF NATIONAL BIOSAFETY FRAMEWORKS Arhus GMO Working Group 24 March 2004

National Biosafety Frameworks (NBFs)

2. Regulatory regime for biosafety

3. System to handle notifications/requests for permits

4. Systems for ‘follow up’: enforcement and monitoring for environmental effects

5. Systems for public information, public awareness and public participation

1. Government policy on biosafety

NBFs vary from country to country, but usually have a number of common components:

Page 4: UNEP-GEF DEMONSTRATION PROJECTS ON IMPLEMENTATION OF NATIONAL BIOSAFETY FRAMEWORKS Arhus GMO Working Group 24 March 2004

Participants: Currently 8 demonstration projects:

Bulgaria, Cameroon, China, Cuba, Kenya, Namibia, Poland, Uganda

Start: Late 2002

Duration: Average 3 years per country

Budgets: From 500,000 – 1,000,000 US$ per country

UNEP-GEF Projects on Implementation of NBFsUNEP-GEF Projects on Implementation of NBFs

Page 5: UNEP-GEF DEMONSTRATION PROJECTS ON IMPLEMENTATION OF NATIONAL BIOSAFETY FRAMEWORKS Arhus GMO Working Group 24 March 2004

Target: Main components of the NBFs “up and running”

UNEP-GEF NBF Implementation ProjectsUNEP-GEF NBF Implementation Projects

Page 6: UNEP-GEF DEMONSTRATION PROJECTS ON IMPLEMENTATION OF NATIONAL BIOSAFETY FRAMEWORKS Arhus GMO Working Group 24 March 2004

Project execution:

January 2003 – July 2003 - ‘laying foundation’: - picture of existing situation- review of draft legislation- start up workshops - fine tuned work plan - summary on UNEP-GEF web site

September 2003 – 2005: - execution of the work plan

UNEP-GEF Projects on Implementation of NBFsUNEP-GEF Projects on Implementation of NBFs

Page 7: UNEP-GEF DEMONSTRATION PROJECTS ON IMPLEMENTATION OF NATIONAL BIOSAFETY FRAMEWORKS Arhus GMO Working Group 24 March 2004
Page 8: UNEP-GEF DEMONSTRATION PROJECTS ON IMPLEMENTATION OF NATIONAL BIOSAFETY FRAMEWORKS Arhus GMO Working Group 24 March 2004

Policies on biosafety - examples of support provided:

Compilation of examples of policy documents • CD-ROM / UNEP-GEF Biosafety web site

Chapter 1 of a guidance document on implementation of NBFs will provide a summary of the compilation:• Policy documents take very different forms• Biosafety policy is usually part of broader policies• Broad-based stakeholder input

UNEP-GEF Projects on Implementation of NBFsUNEP-GEF Projects on Implementation of NBFs

Page 9: UNEP-GEF DEMONSTRATION PROJECTS ON IMPLEMENTATION OF NATIONAL BIOSAFETY FRAMEWORKS Arhus GMO Working Group 24 March 2004

Regulatory regimes - examples of support provided

Expert panels to review (draft) legislation

Drafting implementing regulations / guidelines

Interim measures

Training workshops and the guide address: • Different levels of regulation (Acts, regulations, etc)• Different types of provisions (general provisions,

operational provisions, final clauses)• Examples of provisions

UNEP-GEF Projects on Implementation of NBFsUNEP-GEF Projects on Implementation of NBFs

Page 10: UNEP-GEF DEMONSTRATION PROJECTS ON IMPLEMENTATION OF NATIONAL BIOSAFETY FRAMEWORKS Arhus GMO Working Group 24 March 2004

Handling requests - examples of support provided

Training workshops and the guide address:

1. Administrative processing: application formats, guidance for applicants, internal manuals for processing, checklists, databases etc.

2. Risk assessment: systematic approach of risk assessment based on the Biosafety Protocol, ‘real life’ dossiers, internal manuals for risk assessment procedures

3. Decision making: formats for decision documents

UNEP-GEF Projects on Implementation of NBFsUNEP-GEF Projects on Implementation of NBFs

Page 11: UNEP-GEF DEMONSTRATION PROJECTS ON IMPLEMENTATION OF NATIONAL BIOSAFETY FRAMEWORKS Arhus GMO Working Group 24 March 2004

Enforcement - examples of support provided:

Training workshops and the guide address:

Foundation for enforcement: legal basis, training of personnel

Preparations: inspection plans – prioritisation

Inspections: internal manuals for inspections, checklists

UNEP-GEF Projects on Implementation of NBFsUNEP-GEF Projects on Implementation of NBFs

Page 12: UNEP-GEF DEMONSTRATION PROJECTS ON IMPLEMENTATION OF NATIONAL BIOSAFETY FRAMEWORKS Arhus GMO Working Group 24 March 2004

Monitoring - examples of support provided

Compilation of different approaches for monitoring

environmental effects

Summary of the compilation will be included in the guide

UNEP-GEF Projects on Implementation of NBFsUNEP-GEF Projects on Implementation of NBFs

Page 13: UNEP-GEF DEMONSTRATION PROJECTS ON IMPLEMENTATION OF NATIONAL BIOSAFETY FRAMEWORKS Arhus GMO Working Group 24 March 2004

Public information, awareness and participation – examples of support provided

Compilation of examples of public information and public participation

Address public participation in the training workshops on handling requests for permits

UNEP-GEF Projects on Implementation of NBFsUNEP-GEF Projects on Implementation of NBFs

Page 14: UNEP-GEF DEMONSTRATION PROJECTS ON IMPLEMENTATION OF NATIONAL BIOSAFETY FRAMEWORKS Arhus GMO Working Group 24 March 2004

Handling requests for permits

Applicant

Competent Authority

Risk assessment body

Competent Authority – (draft) decision

Applicant

Page 15: UNEP-GEF DEMONSTRATION PROJECTS ON IMPLEMENTATION OF NATIONAL BIOSAFETY FRAMEWORKS Arhus GMO Working Group 24 March 2004

Public participation in handling requests for permits

Important aspects:

At which point in the procedure?

What form of public participation?

Confidentiality of data

How is information made available?

What is done with the input?

Who is involved?

Page 16: UNEP-GEF DEMONSTRATION PROJECTS ON IMPLEMENTATION OF NATIONAL BIOSAFETY FRAMEWORKS Arhus GMO Working Group 24 March 2004

Training handling requests

1. Administrative processing

3. Decision making

2. Risk assessment

3 steps:

Page 17: UNEP-GEF DEMONSTRATION PROJECTS ON IMPLEMENTATION OF NATIONAL BIOSAFETY FRAMEWORKS Arhus GMO Working Group 24 March 2004

Handling requests - decision documents:

* Summary of the request

* Summary of the risk assessment

* Summary of the procedure – reaction on received comments

* Decision

Page 18: UNEP-GEF DEMONSTRATION PROJECTS ON IMPLEMENTATION OF NATIONAL BIOSAFETY FRAMEWORKS Arhus GMO Working Group 24 March 2004

www.unep.ch/biosafety/implementation.htm