1
UNDERWATER NOISE MAPPING METHODOLOGIES FOR SHALLOW WATERS Author: David Santos-Domínguez | Thesis advisor: Soledad Torres-Guijarro | AffiliaIon: Sonitum (TSC, Universidad de Vigo) 1. MoIvaIon of the work o Methods for evaluaIon and quanIficaIon of underwater noise needed. o European NormaIve(2008/56/EC) asks for specific soluIons but there’s no standard answer. EvaluaIon of the good environmental status of the European waters is needed. o ECODRAGA experience calculaIng source level of a dredger. Environmental impact studies such as punta Langosteira blasIngs or Vigo harbor pilot driving. o Shallow water propagaIon is complex and less invesIgated, good examples in our area/locaIon: mulIpath, depth variable speed of sound, influence of the bathymetry and seabed, etc. 2. ObjecIves O1 Study and evaluaIon of the underwater noise measurement methodologies. O2 Study and evaluaIon of PropagaIon Losses calculaIon O3 Study and calibraIon of underwater noise predicIon socware. O4 CharacterizaIon and classificaIon of the different noise sources available in Ría de Vigo. O5 Development of noise map construcIon methodologies. O6 ConstrucIon of an underwater noise map of Ría de Vigo. 3. Research plan 1 Study about the state of art of underwater noise measurement methodologies. Using databases as sciencedirect, scopus, WOK, etc. [Oct. 2015-Feb. 2016] Figure 1: Underwater noise map recreaIon 2 EvaluaIon of underwater noise measurement methodologies [1][2]. Experimental measurements in shallow water. Development of specific measurement protocols. [Mar. 2016-Jun. 2016] 3 Development of methods and protocols for calculaIng propagaIon losses based on experimental measurements. Field measurements with calibrated source . [Jul. 2016-Oct. 2016] 4 Underwater noise sources recording. Measurement of various sources of underwater noise in Ría de Vigo. [Jul. 2016-Ago. 2016] 6 Study of socware propagaIon models. Comparison of experimental and socware propagaIon losses methodologies. CalibraIon of socware models according to experimental measurements. [May.2017-Jun.2017] 7 Study of underwater noise mapping methodologies development. EvaluaIon of the usefulness of the models obtained in the previous tasks for the development of underwater noise maps, study of the uncertainty of the noise map data according to the uncertainty of the input data to the model. Focusing on 2 soluAons 8 Development of underwater noise map of the Vigo estuary. ValidaIon campaigns measurements: -2 campaigns: summer and winter -3 to 5 days of sampled measurements -3 different and simultaneous locaIons away from main transit [Sep.2017-Feb.2018] 4. Results and discussion Task 3 data have been obtained during Adricristuy dredger measurements session [3] in Moaña harbour, Pontevedra: A methodology to calculate PropagaIon Losses, based on experimental measurements of the measured source and a calibrated source emikng tones in 1/3 octave bands, was established. A measurement set up and data processing were designed and successfully employed to provide received levels at different depths and distances from the measured and calibrated source. Task 6 was completed in conjuncIon with task 3 using different models of private socware dBSea [4]: A methodology to calculate PropagaIon Losses with dBSea, based on calibrated source locaIons and field measurement data, was established. 3 different solver algorithms were tested and a best fikng model, as a funcIon of distance and frequency, was obtained. Task 3 and 6 results have been presented at UACE 2015 [3]. The most important research results are syntheIzed in figure 2: ü SL fikng between both experimental and socware methods is good from 160-1000 Hz, above 1kHz gets worse but sIll acceptable. ü In view of the results, the use of this socware to compute propagaIon losses is reasonable under condiIons of reliable informaIon about bathymetry, sound speed profile and water and seafloor properIes. ü Further work is required in order to get a quanIficaIon of the validity of the results depending on the quanIty and quality of dBSea configuraIon parameters. Figure 2: Experimental vs socware SL calculaIon Figure 3: ShipsEar online snapshot 5. References [1] ANSI/ASA S12.64-2009/Part 1, “Quantities and Procedures for Description and Measurement of Underwater Sound from Ships - Part 1: General Requirements”, American National Standards Institute, New York, (2009). [2] S P Robinson, P D Theobald, G Hayman, L S Wang, P A Lepper, V Humphrey, S Mumford, "Measurement of noise arising from marine aggregate dredging operations, Final Report. MALSF (MEPF Ref no. 09/P108)", Published by the MALSF, ISBN 978 0907545 57 6 (2011). [3] David Santos-Domínguez, Soledad Torres-Guijarro, Antonio Pena-Gimenez, “Analysis of dredger noise based on experimental and simulated source level calculations”, UACE2015 3rd Underwater Acoustics Conference and Exhibition 21st to 26th June 2015 Platanias, Crete, Greece. [4] “dBSea”, underwater acoustics prediction software, www.dbsea.co.uk/ [5] David Santos-Domínguez, Soledad Torres-Guijarro, Antonio Cardenal-López, Antonio Pena-Gimenez “ShipsEar: An underwater vessel noise database”, Applied Acoustics Volume 113, 1 December 2016, Pages 64–69. Task 4 has been completed with several measurement sessions in Ría de Vigo as explained in [5]: More than 100 recordings of 12 different type of vessels were obtained and accompanied by descripIve details such as type of vessel, locaIon of the recording equipment, weather condiIons, etc. An specific methodology for this recording creaIon was also established. The sounds were recorded in real condiIons, so contain both natural and anthropogenic environmental noise. The aim was to provide a database of real sounds that researchers could use, for example, to train vessel detectors and classifiers. Task 5 has been completed using all the data obtained in task 4: A selecIon of 90 recording was used to develop an online database with sound recordings accompanied by fully descripIve details as can be seen in figure 3. Next year planning… (7 to 8) Focusing on possibiliIes of dBSea and Bellhop3D as socware soluIons for noise map modeling. CreaIon of Ría de Vigo underwater noise map and validaIon trough measurements campaigns. 130 135 140 145 150 155 160 125 200 315 500 800 1250 2000 3150 dB Re 1uPa 2 m 2 f(Hz) SL measured SL_dBSea To demonstrate the usefulness of the database, a vessel classifier was developed, based on cepstral coefficients and GMMs. Main results of tasks 4 and 5 have been published in Applied AcousIcs [5]: ü ShipsEar, a database of underwater sounds produced by vessels, with sound recordings accompanied by descripIve details such as type of vessel, locaIon of the recording, weather condiIons, etc. This database can be consulted at hnp:// atlankc.uvigo.es / underwaternoise /. ü The 12 original vessel classes were merged into 4 classes and, using this distribuIon, the system obtained a 75.4% classificaIon rate with 100% accuracy in detecIng background noise and 80% and 76.5% classificaIon rates for the best classes. ü Further work: test more sophisIcated state-of-the-art algorithm for the classifier (SVMs or neural networks); monitor vessels posiIons and improve hydrophone response at low frequencies. 5 ClassificaIon of the recorded sources. CreaIon of a detailed database in web format using data from sources measurements task. Study and evaluaIon of automaIc classifiers. Development of an automaIc classifier tesIng the usefulness of the database proposal. [Nov. 2016-Feb. 2017] dBSea -ConInuous/staIc sources, predictable traffic. -3 different solvers Bellhop3D -Real Ime/dynamic sources, unpredictable traffic -Ray tracing solver [Jul.2017-Agos.2017]

UNDERWATER NOISE MAPPING METHODOLOGIES FOR …doc_tic.uvigo.es/sites/default/files/jornadas2017/posters/P_SantosDavid2017.pdfO1 Study and evaluaon of the underwater noise measurement

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    0

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: UNDERWATER NOISE MAPPING METHODOLOGIES FOR …doc_tic.uvigo.es/sites/default/files/jornadas2017/posters/P_SantosDavid2017.pdfO1 Study and evaluaon of the underwater noise measurement

UNDERWATERNOISEMAPPINGMETHODOLOGIESFORSHALLOWWATERS

Author:DavidSantos-Domínguez|Thesisadvisor:SoledadTorres-Guijarro|AffiliaIon:Sonitum(TSC,UniversidaddeVigo)

1.MoIvaIonoftheworko  MethodsforevaluaIonandquanIficaIonofunderwaternoise

needed.o  EuropeanNormaIve(2008/56/EC)asksforspecificsoluIonsbut

there’s no standard answer. EvaluaIon of the goodenvironmentalstatusoftheEuropeanwatersisneeded.

o  ECODRAGA experience calculaIng source level of a dredger.Environmental impact studies such as punta LangosteirablasIngsorVigoharborpilotdriving.

o  Shallow water propagaIon is complex and less invesIgated,goodexamples inourarea/locaIon:mulIpath,depthvariablespeedofsound,influenceofthebathymetryandseabed,etc.

2.ObjecIvesO1StudyandevaluaIonoftheunderwaternoisemeasurementmethodologies.

O2StudyandevaluaIonofPropagaIonLossescalculaIonO3StudyandcalibraIonofunderwaternoisepredicIonsocware.O4CharacterizaIonandclassificaIonofthedifferentnoisesourcesavailableinRíadeVigo.O5DevelopmentofnoisemapconstrucIonmethodologies.

O6ConstrucIonofanunderwaternoisemapofRíadeVigo.

3.Researchplan

1 Study about the state ofart of underwater noisem e a s u r e m e n tme thodo log i e s . U s i ngdatabases as sciencedirect,scopus,WOK,etc.

[Oct.2015-Feb.2016]

Figure1:UnderwaternoisemaprecreaIon

2 EvaluaIon of underwatern o i s e m e a s u r e m e n tm e t h o d o l o g i e s [ 1 ] [ 2 ] .Experimental measurements inshallow water. Development ofspecificmeasurementprotocols.

[Mar.2016-Jun.2016]

3Developmentofmethodsandp ro toco l s f o r c a l cu l aIngpropagaIon losses based onexperimental measurements.F ie ld measurements w i thcalibratedsource.

[Jul.2016-Oct.2016]

4 Underwater noise sourcesrecording. Measurement ofvarious sources of underwaternoiseinRíadeVigo.

[Jul.2016-Ago.2016]

6StudyofsocwarepropagaIonmodels.Comparison of experimental ands o c w a r e p r o p a g a I o n l o s s e smethodologies. CalibraIon of socwaremodels according to experimentalmeasurements.

[May.2017-Jun.2017]

7Studyofunderwaternoisemappingmethodologiesdevelopment. EvaluaIon of the usefulness of themodels obtained in the previous tasks for thedevelopment of underwater noisemaps, study of theuncertainty of the noise map data according to theuncertaintyoftheinputdatatothemodel.

Focusingon2soluAons

8DevelopmentofunderwaternoisemapoftheVigoestuary.ValidaIoncampaignsmeasurements:-2campaigns:summerandwinter-3to5daysofsampledmeasurements-3 different and simultaneous locaIonsawayfrommaintransit

[Sep.2017-Feb.2018]

4.ResultsanddiscussionTask3datahavebeenobtainedduringAdricristuydredgermeasurementssession[3]inMoañaharbour,Pontevedra:•  A methodology to calculate PropagaIon Losses, based on experimental measurements of the

measuredsourceandacalibratedsourceemikngtonesin1/3octavebands,wasestablished.•  A measurement set up and data processing were designed and successfully employed to provide

receivedlevelsatdifferentdepthsanddistancesfromthemeasuredandcalibratedsource.Task6wascompletedinconjuncIonwithtask3usingdifferentmodelsofprivatesocwaredBSea[4]:•  AmethodologytocalculatePropagaIonLosseswithdBSea,basedoncalibratedsourcelocaIonsand

fieldmeasurementdata,wasestablished.•  3 different solver algorithms were tested and a best fikng model, as a funcIon of distance and

frequency,wasobtained.Task 3 and 6 results have been presented atUACE 2015 [3]. Themost important research results aresyntheIzedinfigure2:ü  SLfikngbetweenboth experimental and socwaremethods is good from160-1000Hz, above1kHz

getsworsebutsIllacceptable.ü  In view of the results, the use of this socware to compute propagaIon losses is reasonable under

condiIons of reliable informaIon about bathymetry, sound speed profile and water and seafloorproperIes.

ü  FurtherworkisrequiredinordertogetaquanIficaIonofthevalidityoftheresultsdependingonthequanItyandqualityofdBSeaconfiguraIonparameters.

Figure2:ExperimentalvssocwareSLcalculaIon

Figure3:ShipsEaronlinesnapshot

5.References[1] ANSI/ASA S12.64-2009/Part 1, “Quantities and Procedures for Description and Measurement of Underwater Sound from Ships - Part 1: General Requirements”, American National Standards Institute, New York, (2009). [2] S P Robinson, P D Theobald, G Hayman, L S Wang, P A Lepper, V Humphrey, S Mumford, "Measurement of noise arising from marine aggregate dredging operations, Final Report. MALSF (MEPF Ref no. 09/P108)", Published by the MALSF, ISBN 978 0907545 57 6 (2011). [3] David Santos-Domínguez, Soledad Torres-Guijarro, Antonio Pena-Gimenez, “Analysis of dredger noise based on experimental and simulated source level calculations”, UACE2015 3rd Underwater Acoustics Conference and Exhibition 21st to 26th June 2015 Platanias, Crete, Greece. [4] “dBSea”, underwater acoustics prediction software, www.dbsea.co.uk/ [5] David Santos-Domínguez, Soledad Torres-Guijarro, Antonio Cardenal-López, Antonio Pena-Gimenez “ShipsEar: An underwater vessel noise database”, Applied Acoustics Volume 113, 1 December 2016, Pages 64–69.

Task4hasbeencompletedwithseveralmeasurementsessionsinRíadeVigoasexplainedin[5]:•  More than 100 recordings of 12 different type of vessels were obtained and accompanied by

descripIve details such as type of vessel, locaIonof the recording equipment,weather condiIons,etc.AnspecificmethodologyforthisrecordingcreaIonwasalsoestablished.

•  The sounds were recorded in real condiIons, so contain both natural and anthropogenicenvironmentalnoise.Theaimwastoprovideadatabaseofrealsoundsthatresearcherscoulduse,forexample,totrainvesseldetectorsandclassifiers.

Task5hasbeencompletedusingallthedataobtainedintask4:•  A selecIon of 90 recording was used to develop an online database with sound recordings

accompaniedbyfullydescripIvedetailsascanbeseeninfigure3.

Nextyearplanning…(7to8)FocusingonpossibiliIesofdBSeaandBellhop3DassocwaresoluIonsfornoisemapmodeling.CreaIonofRíadeVigounderwaternoisemapandvalidaIon troughmeasurementscampaigns.

130

135

140

145

150

155

160

125 200 315 500 800 1250 2000 3150

dB R

e 1u

Pa2 m

2

f(Hz)

SL measured

SL_dBSea

•  Todemonstratetheusefulnessofthedatabase,avesselclassifierwasdeveloped,basedoncepstralcoefficientsandGMMs.

Mainresultsoftasks4and5havebeenpublishedinAppliedAcousIcs[5]:ü  ShipsEar,adatabaseofunderwatersoundsproducedbyvessels,withsoundrecordingsaccompanied

bydescripIvedetails suchas typeofvessel, locaIonof the recording,weathercondiIons,etc.Thisdatabasecanbeconsultedathnp://atlankc.uvigo.es/underwaternoise/.

ü  The 12 original vessel classes were merged into 4 classes and, using this distribuIon, the systemobtaineda75.4%classificaIonratewith100%accuracy indetecIngbackgroundnoiseand80%and76.5%classificaIonratesforthebestclasses.

ü  Further work: test more sophisIcated state-of-the-art algorithm for the classifier (SVMs or neuralnetworks);monitorvesselsposiIonsandimprovehydrophoneresponseatlowfrequencies.

5 ClassificaIon of the recordedsources. CreaIon of a detaileddatabase in web format using datafrom sources measurements task.Study and evaluaIon of automaIcclassifiers. Development of anautomaIc classifier tesIng theusefulnessofthedatabaseproposal.

[Nov.2016-Feb.2017]

dBSea-ConInuous/staIcsources,predictabletraffic.-3differentsolvers

Bellhop3D-RealIme/dynamicsources,unpredictabletraffic-Raytracingsolver

[Jul.2017-Agos.2017]