Upload
others
View
3
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Vinobalan Durairaj, Ph.D., DABR
Senior Medical Physicist
West Physics
8/18/2015 3rd Annual CT Application and Radiation Dose Symposium
Understanding CT dose – A physicist’s perspective
Introducing the Concept
Why CT Dose?
Compare and Contrast – CT and Radiography
Discuss Advantages and Disadvantages of CT
Understanding Dose
CTDI, DLP, Effective Dose etc.
Dose Notification and Alerts
Summary
8/18/2015 3rd Annual CT Application and Radiation Dose Symposium
Learning Objectives
Radiation Dose is the amount of energy absorbed in tissue per
mass of tissue.
Dose is measured in Units of Energy/Mass (J/kg)
8/18/2015 3rd Annual CT Application and Radiation Dose Symposium
Dose Descriptors
8/18/2015 3rd Annual CT Application and Radiation Dose Symposium
Dose Descriptors
Energy deposited is expressed in units of Gray (Gy)
1 mGy = 100 mrads
Biological risk is expressed in units of Sieverts (Sv)
1 mSv = 100 mrem
Note that for diagnostic radiation 1 rem = 1 rad
Average annual radiation effective dose ~ 3 mSv (300 mrads)
from natural background radiation
8/18/2015 3rd Annual CT Application and Radiation Dose Symposium
Radiation Units
Different x-ray modalities address radiation dose in different
ways and choose a different parameter for reference
Radiography – Entrance Skin Exposure (ESE)
Fluoroscopy – ESE and Dose Area Product (DAP)
Mammography – Average Glandular Dose (AGD)
CT – Computed Tomography Dose Index (CTDI), Dose
Length Product (DLP), and Multiple Scan Average Dose
(MSAD)
8/18/2015 3rd Annual CT Application and Radiation Dose Symposium
Dose Descriptors
CTDIvol (mGy) – Specifies the average dose absorbed in the scanned volume of the phantom (or patient of the same size)
DLP (mGy-cm) – Merely CTDIvol multiplied by the scan length of the actual scan. And if the scan length is identical, this could be used to compare doses.
Effective Dose (Sv or mSv) – Describes the radiation risk for the entire human body, but can only be measured with whole body phantoms or calculated with very sophisticated software. It can be estimated using the DLP and conversion factors.
8/18/2015 3rd Annual CT Application and Radiation Dose Symposium
CT Dose Descriptors
According to the National Council of Radiation Protection (NCRP)
report 160, in the US, CT examinations comprise only 17% of all
radiological examinations. However, CT contributes almost 49% of
the effective dose of all radiological examinations. 8/18/2015 3rd Annual CT Application and Radiation Dose Symposium
Why CT Dose?
8/18/2015 3rd Annual CT Application and Radiation Dose Symposium
Why CT Dose?
Sources of average
individual total radiation
dose in the US:1980 vs.
2007.
8/18/2015 3rd Annual CT Application and Radiation Dose Symposium
Why CT Dose?
8/18/2015 3rd Annual CT Application and Radiation Dose Symposium
Why CT Dose?
8/18/2015 3rd Annual CT Application and Radiation Dose Symposium
Scanned 151 times
Total dose 2800 mSv
Why CT Dose?
Advantages of Computed
Tomography
8/18/2015 3rd Annual CT Application and Radiation Dose Symposium
The anatomy to be examined
is scanned in sections like
sliced bread.
The sections are displayed
one at a time.
One advantage of CT is its ability to visualize structures of low
contrast (which is affected by noise).
Noise is determined by the number of photons captured or
absorbed in each tissue voxel.
Noise is closely associated with the dose to the tissue. Image noise
is less apparent when a higher dose is used to create an image, and
low-contrast structures are more easily perceived.
8/18/2015 3rd Annual CT Application and Radiation Dose Symposium
Advantages of Computed
Tomography
8/18/2015 3rd Annual CT Application and Radiation Dose Symposium
Kidney Stone example…
Compared with x-ray radiography:
CT has significantly worse spatial resolution
CT has significantly better contrast resolution
Limiting spatial frequency:
Screen-film radiography ~ 7 line pairs / mm
Digital radiography ~ 5 lp/mm
CT ~ 1 lp/mm
Contrast resolution:
Screen-film radiography ~ 5%
CT ~ 0.5%
CT can distinguish subtle differences, e.g. soft tissue tumors
8/18/2015 3rd Annual CT Application and Radiation Dose Symposium
CT Vs. Radiography: Image Quality
The distribution of dose in CT is different from projection radiography.
In projection radiography, the dose is greatest at the entrance skin side and least at the exit skin side.
In CT, the x-ray tube rotates around the patient. Therefore, the surface dose is uniform and maximum on the entrance skin surface and lower towards the middle of the patient.
8/18/2015
3rd Annual CT Application and Radiation Dose Symposium
CT Vs. Radiography: Dose
High dose gradient
Low dose gradient High dose
Low dose
However, for a large volume like an adult abdomen, the dose at the
surface is almost twice the dose in the center. Because of this, it is
necessary to adjust CT parameters (e.g. kVp, filter etc.) to maintain
image quality, as there is more noise (grainy image) at the center of an
image of a large patient.
8/18/2015 3rd Annual CT Application and Radiation Dose Symposium
Understanding CT Dose
For a small volume like a
head or a pediatric abdomen,
the surface and center dose is
almost the same.
CTDI is a dose to a location (depth) in a scanned volume from a
complete series of slices.
CTDI represents the average dose along the z axis from a series of
contiguous irradiations.
CTDI estimates the average dose within the central region of a
scan volume consisting of multiple, contiguous CT scans.
8/18/2015 3rd Annual CT Application and Radiation Dose Symposium
CTDI (mGy)
CTDI100 is measured from a single axial CT scan collected by a
100 mm long ionization chamber divided by nominal beam width.
8/18/2015 3rd Annual CT Application and Radiation Dose Symposium
CTDI100 (mGy)
-50mm +50mm
Medical physicists usually
measure the CTDI with the use
of a long (100 mm), thin
pencil ionization chamber in a
large acrylic phantom.
The number 100 simply means
that the length of the ion
chamber is 100 mm. Hence the
CTDI100 .
8/18/2015 3rd Annual CT Application and Radiation Dose Symposium
CTDI100 Measurement
Since the dose varies for large bodies, it is higher at the surface than in
the center; CTDIw takes into account the variation of the dose across the
FOV
8/18/2015 3rd Annual CT Application and Radiation Dose Symposium
CTDIw and CTDIvol (mGy)
The CTDIw represents the average absorbed dose in the x
and y direction in the center of the FOV from a series of
axial scans.
To take into account any gaps or overlaps between the x-ray beam for a
specific scan protocol, CTDIvol is used.
Please note that CTDI is an averaged dose measured on a
homogeneous cylindrical phantom, the measurements are only an
approximation of the patient dose.
8/18/2015 3rd Annual CT Application and Radiation Dose Symposium
CTDI – Dose to a patient?!
8/18/2015 3rd Annual CT Application and Radiation Dose Symposium
SSDE (mGy)
SSDE = f x CTDI32vol
= 2.5 x 5.4
= 15 mGy
Example: Consider two patients undergoing a CT scan.
Patient A undergoes a procedure consisting of 10 contiguous slices 2.5
mm thick (or a helical scan 25 mm long with a pitch of 1).
Patient B undergoes the same procedure consisting of 20 contiguous
slices 2.5 mm thick (or a helical scan 50 mm long with a pitch of 1).
8/18/2015 3rd Annual CT Application and Radiation Dose Symposium
Why DLP (mGy-cm)?
In both cases, the scanner will display the same CTDIw (e.g. 27 mGy)
and CTDIvol (e.g. 27 mGy) value.
However, we know that patient B is at more radiation risk than
patient A, as patient B’s radiation burden is double that of patient A
(two times as much tissue received a radiation dose of 27 mGy).
Recall that CTDI represents an average dose in the irradiated volume.
However, the risk from radiation is related to the total amount of dose
deposited in the patient.
The factor that takes this into account is the dose length product
(DLP).
Hence, it is important to prescribe the scan length as close as possible
to the area of interest but still ensure that the desired anatomy is not
missed. 8/18/2015 3rd Annual CT Application and Radiation Dose Symposium
Why DLP (mGy-cm)?
Example of limiting DLP: For a PE exam, the ACR recommends a
coverage from the lung apices to the bases. However, several
facilities extend the scan all the way to adrenal glands, which is
unnecessary as a PE scan is not for tumor detection. 8/18/2015 3rd Annual CT Application and Radiation Dose Symposium
CTDI, Scan Length and DLP
8/18/2015 3rd Annual CT Application and Radiation Dose Symposium
CTDI, Scan Length and DLP
CTDIvol and DLP is displayed on almost all MDCT scanners.
It is usually displayed as the scan parameters are being prescribed.
The operator should always pay attention to the CTDIvol value
before the start of a scan.
8/18/2015 3rd Annual CT Application and Radiation Dose Symposium
CTDI, Scan Length and DLP
CTDI, Scan Length and DLP
CTDIvol is a useful indicator
regarding the dose delivered
to the patient.
Please note that CTDIvol only
gives an index of dose but
not an accurate dose to the
patient, as it has been
calculated using a phantom.
8/18/2015
Effective Dose (mSv)
DLP shows the total energy absorbed attributable to the complete scan
acquisition. However, DLP does not take into account the radio sensitivity
of the irradiated tissue.
The potential biological effects
from ionizing radiation depend
not only on the dose to a tissue or
organ, but also on the sensitivity
of the irradiated tissue or organ.
This difference in biological
sensitivity is reflected by the
Effective Dose.
Effective Dose is defined as the radiation dose that, if received by the
entire body, provides the same radiation risk (i.e. of cancer) as does
the higher dose received by the limited part of the body actually
exposed. 8/18/2015 3rd Annual CT Application and Radiation Dose Symposium
Effective Dose (mSv)
Effective Dose is quite useful as it may be added to the dose the patient received from other examination or it may be compared with radiation doses from naturally occurring sources.
Effective dose facilitates communication with patients regarding the potential harm of a medical exam that uses ionizing radiation.
E.g. Average background radiation from naturally occurring sources ~3.0 mSv versus typical effective dose for a head CT ~ 1-2 mSv.
8/18/2015 3rd Annual CT Application and Radiation Dose Symposium
Effective Dose (mSv)
The effective dose describes the relative ‘Whole body’ dose for a
particular exam and scanner but is not the dose for any one individual.
Effective dose calculations are based on many assumptions e.g.
standard human body. It does not reflect any one individual.
Effective dose is best used to optimize exams and to compare risk
between proposed exams e.g. radiation risk between a Chest CT and a
Chest Radiograph.
Effective dose is a broad measure of risk.
8/18/2015 3rd Annual CT Application and Radiation Dose Symposium
Effective Dose (mSv)
8/18/2015 3rd Annual CT Application and Radiation Dose Symposium
8/18/2015 3rd Annual CT Application and Radiation Dose Symposium
Estimating the Effective Dose
(mSv)
CT Head dose for a 20 year old scanned as above:
Effective dose = k x DLP
= 0.0021 x 836 mSv
= 1.8 mSv
~ 7 months of background
8/18/2015 3rd Annual CT Application and Radiation Dose Symposium
CT Head dose for 8 year old scanned (overdosed?):
Effective dose = k x DLP
= 0.0057 x 1165 mSv
= 6.6 mSv!!!
~ 2 years and 2 months of background!!!
Estimating the Effective Dose
(mSv)
8/18/2015 3rd Annual CT Application and Radiation Dose Symposium
Radiation Risks
8/18/2015 3rd Annual CT Application and Radiation Dose Symposium
Upto 15% more vulnerable
than adults
Considerably more sensitive to
radiation than adults
Have a longer expectancy than
adults resulting in a longer
window
8/18/2015 3rd Annual CT Application and Radiation Dose Symposium
Kids at greater risk than Adults…
Fig. 6.—
Graph shows estimated life-time attributable cancer mortality risk
as a function of age at examination for a single typical CT examination
of head (broken dotted line) and of abdo-men (broken solid line). Note
rapid increase in risk with decreasing age. Brenner et al. Children receive a higher dose than necessary when adult CT
settings are used
8/18/2015 3rd Annual CT Application and Radiation Dose Symposium
Kids at greater risk than Adults…
Children receive a higher dose than necessary when adult CT
settings are used
A facility should have a policy to monitor dose before and after each scan.
Each scanner shall trigger a dose notification message when a single
planned and confirmed scan is likely to exceed the CTDIvol values listed
above. 8/18/2015 3rd Annual CT Application and Radiation Dose Symposium
Notification Level
When the notification message appears, the technologist shall
verify to make sure all scan parameters are entered appropriately.
If all the parameters are entered appropriately, and one of the
following conditions is present, the technologist shall enter the
condition for the “diagnostic reason”
Patient size at liver is greater than 45 cm.
Exceptional image quality is required.
If all parameters are entered appropriately, and none of the above
conditions are met, the technologist shall notify the lead
technologist for protocol modification or approval.
8/18/2015 3rd Annual CT Application and Radiation Dose Symposium
Notification Level
Each scanner shall trigger a Dose Alert message when the
prescribed accumulated dose at any scan location for the entire
planned and confirmed exam is likely to exceed 1000 mGy.
When this message appears, the technologist shall double check to
ensure that all scan parameters are entered appropriately.
If all parameters are entered appropriately, and one of the
following conditions is present, the technologist shall enter the
condition for the diagnostic reason
Patient size at liver is greater than 45 cm.
Exceptional image quality is required.
Scan is an interventional CT procedure. 8/18/2015 3rd Annual CT Application and Radiation Dose Symposium
Dose Alert
If all parameters are entered appropriately, the technologist shall notify the lead CT technologist for approval.
The approval shall be based on the specific patient, indication, and diagnostic question.
8/18/2015 3rd Annual CT Application and Radiation Dose Symposium
Dose Alert
8/18/2015 3rd Annual CT Application and Radiation Dose Symposium
What to Tell Your Patients?
According to BEIR VII report, the risk of radiation-induced cancer
(stochastic effect) is 5% per Sievert (Sv) (1 Sv = 1000 mSv). This means
that there can be five additional radiation-induced cancers if 10,000 people
were exposed to 0.01 Sievert or 10 mSv.
8/18/2015 3rd Annual CT Application and Radiation Dose Symposium
What to Tell Your Patients?
Self Evaluation How closely do you follow ALARA Principles?
Are you documenting radiation dose in a retrievable format for every
study - What is important is doing it but more important is to document
it!
Do you verify that patients really need CT scan and do you protocol
them?
Do you consider patient’s age/weight when you protocol the patients?
Are your protocols up to date? Are you going to meetings and/or
looking at literature?
Are you incorporating new ideas into your protocols and if so do you
review them on a regular basis?
Are you comparing your doses to national benchmarks?
8/18/2015 3rd Annual CT Application and Radiation Dose Symposium
Justify each scan; Use another modality, if/when possible
Configure protocol to clinical indication, age, size, prior scan
history, anatomy etc.
Minimize variability
Use Dose modulation viz., Auto mA/Smart mA, Care
Dose/Care kV etc.
Pediatrics: Less than half the adult dose?
Screen with CT, Confirm with MRI!
Dose well below ACR guidelines
Sharing is Caring
Summary
AAPM CT Dose Summit: Scan Parameter Optimization – Atlanta,
GA – 2010
Image Gently (www.pedrad.org)
MDCT Physics – The Basics – Mahadevappa Mahesh
Principles of CT and CT Technology – Lee W. Goldman
AAPM Report # 96
Radiation dose in CT- Michael F. McNitt-Gray, Ph.D.
Radiation Dose Modulation Techniques in the MDCT Era: From
Basics to Practice – Radiographics RSNA 2008
8/18/2015 3rd Annual CT Application and Radiation Dose Symposium
Further Reference
8/18/2015 3rd Annual CT Application and Radiation Dose Symposium
Questions!