Upload
under-the-influence
View
212
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Cork versus screwcap versus synthetic!
Citation preview
Plat 12
Wine closures are at the centre of a heated debate focusing on which
product does the job better. In the left corner, the current world
champion, cork! A flexible, perfectly suited option with many years of
experience doing the job, but with a fatal weakness, TCA (creating a
corked wine). In the right hand corner we have a myriad of other
products; screwcap, composite corks, synthetic and glass.
At the moment it is a David versus Goliath situation. Out of 18 billion
bottles sealed, 14 billion are sealed in cork. But gains are being made by
the new kids on the block and we are going to have a look at just what
makes a good closure for our favourite tipple.
FOCUS ON THE CLOSURE
CORKY!
Wine has been closed by cork for
over 300 years. It is an absolutely
ideal tool for the job. Cork trees
are one of few trees that can have
their bark stripped and still survive.
So, if you want a cork urgently and
need to start from scratch, the first
step is to plant a cork tree. The
second step is to wait 43 years.
Once can then harvest the bark to
make cork, only having to wait
another 9 years to your next batch,
all the way to when the tree turns
170 years old.
What makes cork so special?
• It has a honeycomb structure making it very strong but also very
pliable.
• The cork is made up of gazillions of small gas filled compartments
making it light and easy to compress.
• It is very resistant to moisture.
• It has a major weakness though… TCA!
TCA is what causes a wine to be corked. A wine is corked when you taste
musty, damp, wet cardboard type flavours. It is very distinct!
Technically TCA is known as 2,4,6 trichloroanisole. Chemistry buffs like
to keep us in a state of confusion but quite simply TCA is caused by little
microbes in the cork reacting with Chlorine, going ballistic and causing a
fungi to impart musty flavours. These little microbes often reside in the
darker imperfections in the cork, where there is more oxygen and a
better chemistry kit for things to happen!
TCA is an intense beasty. Humans can pick up 1 part per trillion of TCA
in a wine. That is like freezing one second in a 6400 year time period.
We are really sensitive to it because evolution has taught us that fungi
type flavours might be dangerous. TCA is not dangerous, just a bit
funky! So, because about 5% (a contested figure) of wines have TCA in
them there is a good case for other types of wine closures.
WHAT THE HECK IS TCA?
OXIDATION VERSUS REDUCTION
Before we get into the knitty gritty of cork versus screwcap we need to
understand the different between oxidation and reduction in a wine. The
reason being is we need to answer the question, does a wine need a
small amount of oxygen contact to age well?
Oxidation
Louis Pasteur once said, “Oxygen is the enemy of wine!”. The French
tend to exaggerate and in certain stages of wine making oxygen is
welcome. However too much oxygen contact will lead to a wine that
smells flat, of fresh cut apples where the fruit aromas turn to caramel
and the flavour becomes dull and event bitter. The colour of an oxidised
wine turns to brown.
People often refer to an oxidised
wine as being madeirised,
showing traits of the Port wines of
Madeira.
To protect a wine from becoming
oxidised during wine making and
after it is opened wine makers add
SO2 to the pot. This acts as an
antioxidant but also helps kill off
microbes, which can lead to funky
things happening in a wine.
White wines typically need higher levels of SO2 then reds to protect
them. Red wines have more phenolics compounds and tannin in them
which gives the wine a natural defence against oxygen.
Interestingly, wines that have been completely protected from oxygen in
the production process tend to be more sensitive to its effects
afterwards.
Good wine making usually involves some oxygen contact, such as when
the wine is in barrels, there is contact here, and when the wine is moved
from one container to another. The advent of modern wine making
techniques has led to a more reductive way of doing things...
Reduction
Reductive wine making basically involves shielding the wine from oxygen
as much as possible. This leads to the more fruit driven wines, and
especially crisp white wines.
Reduction in wine has been called the new cork taint. I am almost
certain this term was coined by a top level marketing executive at a cork
manufacturer! Reduction is a hot topic exactly because it places doubt on
whether screwcaps are indeed the perfect closure.
Reduction in wine is exactly the opposite of oxidation, it occurs from a
lack of contact with oxygen. Too much reduction in a wine leads to burnt
match, rubbery and sulphur type aromas. It is a fine line though,
because reductive aromas include cats pee in Sauvignon Blanc and
biscuit in Champagne, both positive traits (for Champagne at least!).
At least you know your jacket can breath
In addition to drinking beer Australians enjoy conducting wine studies
and in ongoing trials of screwcap wines they have consistently picked up
reductive aromas in tested wines. This takes place due to the low oxygen
environment created, as most screwcaps don’t let any oxygen into the
wine.
The key it seems to producing screwcap wines that are not reductive in
aroma is to limit the amount of S02 used. It is the sulphur in the wine
that reacts in a low oxygen environment causing the burnt match
aromas.
WHAT ABOUT PLASTIC CORKS?
What about them indeed! Apart from being quite difficult to extricate
from a bottle, plastic, or synthetic corks, have certainly helped the
marketing folk phase out cork in markets that are averse to screwcap.
The problem with this closure type is that is hasn’t come close to
replicating the incredible traits of cork. They are not as pliable and even
worse than that they let in too much oxygen, making it difficult to
prevent oxidation for wines that need to be aged. Of course, they are not
often used in wines that need to be aged, so this is not a bad
compromise by wine makers wanting to preserve the tradition of the
corkscrew, take out the risk of taint and purvey early drinking vino.
SCREWCAP AND REDUCTION
The answer to this complex question of which closure to use is constantly
evolving as new technologies are found.
Screwcaps were hailed as the perfect solution but now reduction is seen
as a fault caused by the lack of oxygen in a screwcapped wine. They are
beautifully suited to keeping early drinking white wines fresh however
and more and more red wines are being placed under this closure, giving
us a chance to see how these evolve over time.
Synthetic corks just let through too much oxygen and most wines under
this closure start to show oxidised characteristics after five years. It is a
superb “training wheel” version of the natural cork though.
For the traditionalists out there cork is the only answer. Indeed, until a
famous Chateau starts using screwcap it will probably stay like this.
There is a certain art and ceremony in opening a bottle of wine with a
corkscrew. The only problem is if we stuck to tradition we would be
commuting to work on horseback! Cork taint or TCA is a huge problem
and one that is being faced. New innovations are out there and will be
covered in our video tasting on www.undertheinfluence.co.za. The great
thing about this debate, is the choice is ultimately yours!
SO WHERE DOES THIS LEAVE US?
Too little
oxygen
contact
Too
much
oxygen
contact
Reductive Balanced
Under the Influence of the Closure
Oxidative
Screwcaps
• Can lead to reductive
flavours.
• Keeps white wines
fresh.
Plastic / synthetic
• Wine oxidizes too
quickly.
• Well suited to early
drinking wines.
Cork
• The perfect closure.
• Well, at least 19 out of
20 are!
• TCA is a problem.
PLATINUM 6