26
Core Value Unconventional Gas Production and Water Resources: Lessons from the U.S. Brisbane, Sydney & Canberra, Australia February 27 March 1, 2012 Mark K. Boling Executive Vice President & General Counsel

Unconventional Gas Core Value Production and Water ... · Core Value Unconventional Gas Production and Water Resources: Lessons from the U.S. Brisbane, Sydney & Canberra, Australia

  • Upload
    hanhu

  • View
    219

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Core Value Unconventional Gas

Production and Water Resources: Lessons

from the U.S.

Brisbane, Sydney

& Canberra, Australia

February 27 – March 1, 2012

Mark K. Boling

Executive Vice President & General Counsel

The Promise of Natural Gas

• The Environment

• The Economy

• Energy Security

• The Economy

• The Environment

• Energy Security

Current Regulatory Environment

Public Distrust

and Fear

Natural Gas

Industry

Certain

Environmental

Activists/Groups

Proposed

Federal

Legislation

THE

PERFECT

STORM

Refocusing the Debate

• Dial Down the Rhetoric

• Identify the Real Obstacles to

Responsible Development of

this Resource

• Develop Workable Solutions to

Overcome these Obstacles

3

Regulatory Considerations

Surface Considerations

Subsurface Considerations

4

Regulatory Considerations

5

Air Emissions

Water Supply

Water Handling

Water Reuse & Disposal

Surface Considerations

Surface Impact • Drilling Locations

• Infrastructure • Truck traffic & road damage

Regulatory Considerations

Protecting Underground

Water Resources

Frac Fluid Disclosure

Subsurface Considerations

6

7

Protecting Underground Water Resources

Well Integrity

Is the Key!

8

Well Integrity

Well Construction Standards

2 Evaluate Stratigraphic Confinement

1

Evaluate Mechanical Integrity of Well

3 Monitor Frac Job & Producing Well

4

4000’ of Sediment

Surface Casing 550’

400’ Usable Fresh Water

2100’ Various Atoka

Sands & Shales

1300’ Upper Hale

600’ Morrow Shale

Hindsville

300’ Fayetteville Shale

9

Cross sectional view

1. Evaluating Stratigraphic Confinement

Virtually all fresh water wells

are less than 500 feet deep

in the Fayetteville Shale area

Thousands of feet of rock

separates the Fayetteville Shale

from shallow, freshwater zones

Cross sectional view

Evaluating Stratigraphic Confinement

10

• Differences in rock properties (i.e. strength and brittleness/elasticity) between the

target formation (Fayetteville Shale) and surrounding formations (Morrow Shale

and Hindsville Lime) act to contain hydraulic fractures within the target formation.

• Hydraulic fractures follow the path of least resistance and continue to propagate

within the Fayetteville Shale.

600’ Morrow Shale

300’ Fayetteville Shale

Hindsville

Microseismic Evaluation of Stimulation Treatment

11

Cross Sectional View

1,000’

Subsea Depth

-2,000’

-3,000’

-2,200’

-2,800’

-2,600’

-2,400’

Top of Morrow Shale

Well Path

The largest recorded seismic event generates

the same amount of energy as would be

released when dropping a gallon of milk from

chest high to the floor.

Top of Hindsville Lime

Top of Fayetteville Shale

~ 200’

Evaluating Stratigraphic Confinement Shallow Wells

12

850’

400’ Usable Fresh Water

300’ Fayetteville Shale

450’ Atoka

Sands & Shales

Abandoned Well

Transmissive

Fault

In most shallow formations

(less than ~2,000’), the hydraulic

fracture will propagate in a

horizontal direction.

Cross sectional view

4000’

of Sediment

Surface Casing 550’

13

Cross sectional view

2. Well Construction Standards

400’ Usable Fresh Water

2100’ Various Atoka

Sands & Shales

1300’ Upper Hale

600’ Morrow Shale

Hindsville

300’ Fayetteville Shale

4000’

of Sediment

Surface Casing 550’

Cross sectional view

400’ Usable Fresh Water

2100’ Various Atoka

Sands & Shales

1300’ Upper Hale

600’ Morrow Shale

Hindsville

300’ Fayetteville Shale

FRESH WATER AQUIFER ZONE

SHALLOW PRODUCING ZONE

WELL CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS

TARGET PRODUCING ZONE

CONDUCTOR PIPE

SURFACE CASING

PRODUCTION CASING

CEMENT

CEMENT

CEMENT

3. Evaluating Mechanical Integrity of Well

• Internal Mechanical Integrity

– Verify appropriateness of

proposed casing program

(e.g., size, grade, minimum

internal yield pressure, etc.)

– Test casing string to ensure

it can withstand maximum

stimulation pressure

• External Mechanical Integrity

– Verify quality of cement

– Identify top of cement

– Test cement job (FIT, CBL,

etc.) when operations

indicate inadequate coverage

15

FRESH WATER AQUIFER ZONE

SHALLOW PRODUCING ZONE

CONDUCTOR PIPE

SURFACE CASING

PRODUCTION CASING

TARGET PRODUCING ZONE

GOOD MECHANICAL INTEGRITY

CEMENT CHANNELING

PRESSURE

BUILDS UP

CONDUCTOR PIPE

SURFACE CASING

PRODUCTION CASING

FRESH WATER AQUIFER ZONE

SHALLOW PRODUCING ZONE

TARGET PRODUCING ZONE

CA

SIN

G

CE

ME

NT

FO

RM

AT

ION

FRESH WATER AQUIFER ZONE

SHALLOW PRODUCING ZONE

TARGET PRODUCING ZONE

INSUFFICIENT CEMENT COVERAGE

PRESSURE

BUILDS UP

CONDUCTOR PIPE

SURFACE CASING

PRODUCTION CASING

4. Monitoring Frac Job and Producing Well

19

• Monitor pump pressure and rate during frac job

• Monitor annular pressures during and after frac job

• Terminate operations and take corrective action if abnormal pressure responses indicate mechanical integrity failure or fracture growth out of target zone

Regulatory Considerations

20

Air Emissions Surface Considerations

Surface Impact • Drilling Locations

• Infrastructure • Truck traffic & road damage

Water Supply

Water Handling

Water Reuse & Disposal

Surface Considerations

Water Supply

Water Handling

Water Reuse & Disposal

Water Supply

21

Location,

Volume & Timing

of Withdrawals

Cumulative Impact

Assessment

Alternative

Sources of Supply

Water Handling

22

Trucks vs. Pipeline • Truck Traffic

• Road Damage Impoundments vs. Tanks • Closed-Loop Drilling Systems

• Recycling Logistics

• Air Emissions

Tracking Wastewater • Characterizing Wastewater

• Recording Volumes Produced

• Verifying Volumes Delivered

Water Reuse & Disposal

Water Recycling & Reuse • Reduces fresh water demand

• Reduces impact on roads and related infrastructure

• Reduces amount of wastewater requiring disposal

Water Treatment Facilities • Flowback & produced water

chemistry

• Capacity & Capability limitations (NORM, DBPs, heavy metals)

• Central vs. drill site facilities

Water Disposal Wells • Geological & hydrological limitations

• NIMBY concerns

• Induced seismicity considerations

23

Recycled

Flowback

Water

Frac Tanks WELL PAD

Frac fluid pumped

down wellbore during

stimulation job.

Additives mixed with fresh

and recycled water to

make up “frac fluid.”

Approximately 20-40% of frac

fluids return to the surface as

“flowback water.”

Flowback/Produced Water

24

58% Private & SWN

Fresh Water Sources Surface Water, Shallow

Ground Water

17% Public Fresh Water

Sources Surface Municipal,

Streams, Rivers

25% Recycled Water

Well

100% Recycled

Flowback Water

Supply

Handling

Reuse &

Disposal

Treated Water

Produced Water

~10% Recycled ~90% Disposal

Wells

Treatment Facilities

Private/Public

Water Cycle for Hydraulic Fracturing Operations

Waste Disposal

NPDES Permitted Discharge

Core Value Unconventional Gas

Production and Water Resources: Lessons

from the U.S.

Brisbane, Sydney

& Canberra, Australia

February 27 – March 1, 2012

Mark K. Boling

Executive Vice President & General Counsel