Upload
others
View
9
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
©2012 Waters Corporation 1
UltraPerformance Convergence ChromatographySupercritical Fluid Separations
With The Power & Performance of ACQUITY
©2012 Waters Corporation 2
What is a Supercritical Fluid ?
What is Supercritical Fluid Chromatography ?
Introduction To UPC2™
ACQUITY UPC2™ Performance
ACQUITY UPC2™ Applications
Summary
Agenda
©2012 Waters Corporation 3
What Is A Supercritical Fluid ?
"A supercritical fluid is any substance at a temperature and pressure above its critical point, where distinct liquid and gas phases do not exist.
It can effuse through solids like a gas, and dissolve materials like a liquid.
In addition, close to the critical point, small changes in pressure or temperature result in large changes in density, allowing many properties of a supercritical fluid to be "fine-tuned".
Supercritical fluids are suitable as a substitute for organic solvents in a range of industrial and laboratory processes. Carbon dioxide and water are the most commonly used supercritical fluids, being used for decaffeination and power generation, respectively."*
* http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supercritical_fluid
©2012 Waters Corporation 4
CO2 Phase Diagram
* Adapted from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Carbon_dioxide_pressure-temperature_phase_diagram.svg
-75 -25 25 75 125
Temperature - T (oC)
Critical T = 31.1 oCCritical P = 74 bar/1070 psi
Pre
ssu
re –
P (
bar)
©2012 Waters Corporation 5
Diffusivity & Viscosity More Like A Gas– Diffusivity promotes chromatographic mass transfer/resolving power
– Lower viscosity promotes chromatographic speed
Solvating Power Like A Liquid
Properties of Supercritical Fluids
Diffusivity(cm2/s)
Viscosity(g/cm x s)
Gas 10 -1 10 -4
Supercritical Fluid 10-4 - 10-3 10-4 - 10-3
Liquid < 10 -5 10 -2
©2012 Waters Corporation 6
What is Supercritical Fluid Chromatography (SFC) ?
Chromatographic Technique Similar to HPLC
Mobile Phase = Supercritical Fluid + One or More Co-Solvents– CO2 = most common supercritical fluid
– MeOH = most common co-solvent
©2012 Waters Corporation 7
SFC Characteristics
Normal Phase Technique– Polar stationary phase/non-polar mobile phase – Elution order from lowest to highest polarity– Strong solvent = more polar solvent = MeOH– Weak solvent = less polar solvent = CO2
Compatible With Common LC Detectors– UV-VIS, ELSD, MS
Utility For Many Industries/Market Segments– Applicable to wide range of compounds/varied functionality & polarity– Petrochem, pharma, polymer, environmental, food, natural products
Ideal For Prep Applications– Easy removal of CO2 from fractions
Method Of Choice For Chiral Separations
©2012 Waters Corporation 8
Better Mass Transfer Than LC– More efficient separations
Better Solvation Than GC– Useful for broader range of analytes
– Not restricted to volatile analytes
Easily Manipulated Density– For fine tuning separations
SFC vs. GC vs. LC
©2012 Waters Corporation 9
http://www.soton.ac.uk/~gjl/images/SFC_figure2.jpg
SFC vs. LCSeparation Speed & Efficiency
Greater Diffusivity– Higher optimal flow rates
– Shorter run times
– Same resolving power
Lower Viscosity– Longer columns can be used
– Increased separation efficiency/equivalent run times
©2012 Waters Corporation 10
Which Compounds Work?
Insoluble In Water <0.1mg/mL
LogP-10 -8 -6 -4 -2 0 2 4 6 8 10 12
DemonstratedSFC Region
RPLC
Data from Actelion Corp. Web Site
Candidates for SFC– Normal phase LC separations
– Separations that are problematic for LC and GC
– Compounds in need of derivatization for GC
– Compounds soluble in methanol or less polar solvents
©2012 Waters Corporation 11
Do Small Particle, i.e. < 2 µm, Column Chemistries
Provide The Same Benefits To SFC As They
Do To Traditional Reversed Phase LC?
©2012 Waters Corporation 12
2.5 µm XBridge™ HILIC, 3.0x50 mm
5.0 µm XBridge™ HILIC, 3.0x50 mm
3.5 µm XBridge™ HILIC, 3.0x50 mm
1.7 µm ACQUITY BEH , 3.0x50 mm
SFC Column Efficiency Curves
©2012 Waters Corporation 13
SFC Resolution Comparison
Column 21.7 µm Particles
Column 15 µm Particles
SFC Separations3.0 x 100 mm Column
2 mL/minuteCO2/Methanol Gradient
©2012 Waters Corporation 14
Introduction & Performance
©2012 Waters Corporation 15
A World Without UPC2
©2012 Waters Corporation 16
Why Is SFC A Niche Technique ?
Considered Exotic– Not taught as part of analytical chemistry curriculum
No Major Chromatography Company Presence– "Frankensystems" comprised of with modules from multiple vendors
Problems With Robustness– Poor precision
– Baseline noise/poor sensitivity
– Unsuitable for regulated environments
Systems Don't Provide A Complete Solution– Hardware/Software/Chemistry/Support
©2012 Waters Corporation 17
The ACQUITY UPC2
Designed Holistically For Optimum Performance
Built Upon Proven UPLC Technology– Quantifiable increases in productivity
SFC Capability With LC Familiarity
Reproducible & Robust– Can withstand rigors of method validation
Complete Solution– Hardware, software, chemistry, service & support
©2012 Waters Corporation 18
ACQUITY UPC2 System Features
UPC2 Binary Solvent Manager– Blends & delivers CO2 & co-solvent– 4 selectable co-solvents– 0.010 to 4.000 mL/min flow rate range
UPC2 Fixed Loop Sample Manager– Partial or full loop injection modes
ACQUITY Column Manager– Multi column selector for selectivity screening
UPC2 Convergence Manager– Incoming CO2 management & system pressure control– Key to precision, ruggedness & reducing baseline noise
Empower™ & MassLynx™ Compatible
©2012 Waters Corporation 19
UPC2™ COMPOUND DIVERSITY
Column: ACQUITY UPC2 Hybrid,2.1 x 150 mm ,1.7µm
Flow: 1.2mL/min Col Temp: 45 CDetection: UV 230nmInj Vol: 2µLGradient: 2 – 16% MeOH in 7 minutesABPR: 130 bar
Gradient Separation Diverse Polarity Mix– 18 components,
– Amines, vitamins, dyes, steroids, antibacterials
Exceptional Resolution
Exceptional Precision– Retention time repeatability < 0.4 % RSD, N = 6
©2012 Waters Corporation 20
Overlay Of 10 Injections
Overlay Of 10 Injections
UPC2 ™ Gradient Performance
Precise & Accurate Co-Solvent Addition– Essential to the separation of closely related
compounds, e.g. isomers, plant extracts, & essential oils of natural products
Overlays Of 10 Injections
0.5% Difference inSolvent Composition
©2012 Waters Corporation 21
UPC2 ™ Injector Linearity
Excellent Partial Loop Linearity– 1 – 10 μL
©2012 Waters Corporation 22
UPC2 ™ Detector Sensitivity
Low Noise For Enhanced Sensitivity
©2012 Waters Corporation 23
UPC2 ™ Column Chemistries
BEH
BEH 2-Ethylpyridine
CSH Fluoro-Phenyl
HSS SB
©2012 Waters Corporation 24
Applications
Lipids
©2012 Waters Corporation 25
UPC2 MSCell Membrane Polar Lipids
CERPG PE
PC
LPC
LPE
SM
Rapid Screening Separation
No Derivatization
Direct Injection of Extraction Solvent
©2012 Waters Corporation 26
UPC2 & LipidomicsMouse Heart Extract/MS Detection
Glycerolipids(NH4+ adducts)
SM
PC
PE
LP
E
Cardiolipins
TAG
DAG
MAG
PGPS
LPC
©2012 Waters Corporation 27
Applications
Mixed Tocopherols
©2012 Waters Corporation 28
UPC2 ™ Mixed Tocopherols
Column: ACQUITY UPC2 BEH3.0 x 100 mm, 1.7 μM
Flow Rate: 2.5 mL/minColumn Temp: 50 oCDetection: UV 293 nm (compensated 500 -600 nm)Inj Vol: 1 μLABPR: 1885 psiGradient: 2 – 5 % Methanol in 1.5 minutes
©2012 Waters Corporation 29
Applications
Organic Light Emitting Diodes
©2012 Waters Corporation 30
UPC2 ™ Organic Light Emitting Diodes
Ir(fppy)3Area, 0.4% RSDRT, 0.1% RSD
TCTAArea, 1.1% RSDRT, 0.1% RSD
Balq (a)Area, 1.1% RSDRT, 0.1% RSD
α-NHPArea, 0.4% RSDRT, 0. 0.1% RSD
N
FF
N
F
F
Ir
N
F
F
7 min UPC2 Analysis–10x reduction vs. NPLC
4 Components/7 Impurities– Resolves NPLC co-elution
©2012 Waters Corporation 31
UPC2 ™ OLEDSIr(fppy)3 Degraded Sample Via MS
Ir(fppy)3
N
FF
N
F
F
Ir
N
F
F
Ir(fppy)3Isomer ?
Ir(fppy)3 – FIsomers ? Ir(fppy)3 – F ?
Ir(fppy)3 -2F ???
©2012 Waters Corporation 32
Applications
Chiral Separations
©2012 Waters Corporation 33
UPC2™Enantiomeric Excess Determination of Benzyl Mandelate
(R) & (S) Benzyl Mandelate0.20 mg/mL each
0.02% Impurity
"Pure" (R) Benzyl Mandelate2.0 mg/mL
©2012 Waters Corporation 34
Normal Phase LC Method Conversion &
GC Alternative
©2012 Waters Corporation 35
6.23
7
10.8
55
20.8
50
26.6
32
30.8
56
35.8
19
AU
-0.0004
-0.0002
0.0000
0.0002
0.0004
0.0006
0.0008
0.0010
0.0012
0.0014
0.0016
0.0018
0.0020
M inutes0.0 0 5.00 10.00 15.00 20.00 25.00 30.00 35.00 40.00 45.00 50.00
ACQUITY UPC2
Solvent Cost/Run ~ $0.05
Normal Phase HPLCSolvent Cost/Run ~ $5.89
UPC2
– 3x reduction in run time
– 2 more impurities found
– > 10x reduction in solvent cost
– No halogenated solvent waste
NPLC To UPC2™ Method Conversion USP Impurity Analysis For Estradiol
©2012 Waters Corporation 360.0 3.0 6.0 9.0
Biodiesel Glyceride Analysis
FAMEs & HCs
Triglycerides
Monoglycerides Diglycerides
TriglyceridesPetroleum Diesel Hydrocarbons
FAMEs
FAMEs
pA
0
20
40
60
80
100
Minutes0 4 8 12 16 20 24
LSU
0
500
1000
1500
2000
Minutes
ACQUITY UPC2 ELSDUnderivatized Biodiesel standard UPC2
– No derivatization
– 2.5x reduction in analysis time
– Glycerides well separated from FAMES
GC-FIDDerivatized Biodiesel standard
Mono & Diglycerides
©2012 Waters Corporation 37
Summary
©2012 Waters Corporation 38
Analyze a Diverse Range of Compounds
©2012 Waters Corporation 39
Green Cost Effective Solution
©2012 Waters Corporation 40
ACQUITY UPC2 ™
Merges Proven UPLC Technology With SFC
Improves Resolution, Sensitivity & Speed
Direct Replacement For NP LC
Method Of Choice For Chiral Separations
Reduces Cost Of Operation
Reduces Use Of Toxic Solvents
Complete System Solution– Hardware, software, chemistry support
©2012 Waters Corporation 41