Upload
ben-spong
View
90
Download
5
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
UKSCA Accreditation Case Study
Ben SpongPortsmouth FC
ContentSport and SubjectNeeds Analysis –Sport and SubjectSubject Assessment and Goals3 Month Integrated Coaching ProgramReview and ReassessmentFuture RecommendationsReferences
Sport and SubjectAge: 16 (at start of intervention)Playing age: 8Training age: 1Sport: Football (soccer)Position: Centre DefenderLevel: 1st year scholar in Portsmouth FC Youth
Team
Needs Analysis - Sport Low intensity for 70% of match play with 150-250 brief
intense actions, including changes of direction and repeated sprint efforts (Bangsbo, Mohr & Krustrup, 2006)
Central Defenders spend the majority (34%) of game time between Aerobic and Anaerobic Threshold, in HR Zone 3 (Bujnovsky et al., 2015)
TD = 10,336m ± 471m, with 186m ± 82m of Sprint TD (1.78%) (Andrzejewski et al., 2015)
Multi directional movements: lateral, forward, backwards, turning, jumping, kicking, sprinting (Bangsbo, Mohr & Krustrup, 2006)
Potential to play 60+ games, with 3-4 hours training 4 days per week. Change in volume from schoolboy to apprentice level playing.
Needs Analysis – Sport Injury RiskLower extremity non-contact ligament injuries at
ankle and knee most prevalent in soccer with ATFL and MCL most commonly reported
Youth players injury risk increased during PHVPrevious injury highlighted as significant risk
factor across all ages of football (soccer) (Read et al., 2016)
Proprioception and Eccentric Hamstring exercises suggested as a positive intervention for reducing injury risk (Junge & Dvorak, 2004)
Needs / CharacteristicsPosition Height (cm) Weight (kg) Body Fat (%)Central Defence
175 66 12CMJ 20m Sprint AR AL24.4 3.03 8.17 8.22
(Gioldasis et al., 2014 ; Nike Average SPARQ Data Season 14/15)
Player Height (cm) Weight (kg) Body Fat (%)Player A 186 78.4 6.7CMJ 20m AR AL YoYo 1RM
BP1Rm Sqt
23.45 3.3 8.7 8.4 31 95 110
ScreeningModified Functional Movement Screen (Cook,
2014)Dysfunction Daily Intervention
Poor BL Stability SL Stability Exercises (BL)
Poor Ecc Control of LL Propriception exercises, Pistol Squat, Depth Jumps, SL Landing
Tight Hamstrings Foam Rolling, Dynamic Stretching Routine
*No significant injury history recorded.
Goals and OutcomesCoach GoalsS+C Coach • Improve RFD
• Improve Eccentric Control• Improve Proprioception on SL• Increase Arrowhead Speed
Physio • Remain Injury Free• Increase SL Stability
Technical Coach
• Increase in game Speed• Increase in game Strength • In Game body position
Program Outline3 month, 12 week block (2 x 6 week mesocycles).
Feb – April ’16Weeks 1-6 7-12
Strength • RFD• Tech Education
• RFD• Tech Education
Power • On Pitch Plyo x2 p/w
• Power Based Gym Work• On Pitch Plyo x2 p/w
Speed • SAQ Drills in Warm up x5 p/w
• Running Mechs within
• Plyometrics in Warm Up x5 p/w• Horizontal force production to
increase forward mechanics
Agility • On Pitch x2 p/w On pitch x2 p/w
Endurance • Daily Red Zone targets
• Daily Red Zone Targets
Macrocycle – 1 season
Macrocyle OverviewSeason long program, with 6 week mesocycles.
Encompassing Pre Competiton, Competiton, Transition and Recovery phases (Bompa, 1999)
Wave loaded Volume and Intensity (Rosenblatt, 2014)
Performance peaking December and March, based on fixture schedule and scholarship structure.
Mesocycle Conditioning Programme
Mesocycle Outputs
Week 1-60
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
WEEKLY TARGET Actual Scores
Week 7-120
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
WEEKLY TARGET Actual Scores
Mesocycle Strength Programme
Strength Outcomes
Test 1 Test 2 Test 390
95
100
105
110
115
120
BenchSquat
Mesocycle OverviewWave loaded weeks, with deload every 5th week to
allow for supercompensation and general adaptation (Rosenblatt, 2014; Bompa, 1999)
Monitored using a Training Impulse (RPE Session Duration = SRPE) (Gabbett, 2016)
Chronic workload gained from SRPE, and maintained throughout season
HR used to monitor time spent in Red Zones, although unreliable and not used for program design at this stage
Microcycle PlanMon Tues Weds Thurs Fri Sat Sun
Warm Up • Light Jog• Dynamic
Mobility• Straight
Line Sprint
• Plyometic• Power
Work, Jumps, Bounds
REST • Agility• COD
• Light• Dynamic
Mobility• Straight
Line Sprint
GAME REST
Tech • Light Session, Phase of Play
• Hard Session
• SSGs• Phase of
Play• Running
Block
REST • Hard Session
• SSG
• Light Session
• Set Piece• Game
Prep
GAME REST
Gym • UL Strength
• LL Strength
REST • WB Power• UL
Strength
OFF GAME REST
Other • Prehab• Hydration
Test
• Prehab• Hydration
Test
• Prehab• Hydration
Test
• Prehab• Hydration
Test
• Prehab• Hydration
Test
Prehab REST
Microcycle Outcomes
Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday Sunday0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
Microcyle OverviewWave loaded, with peak on Saturday game day2 Rest Days (Weds, Sun)2 day recovery method (Sun, Mon (Active))SRPE measured, acute workload matching chronic
workload 1:1 – 1.5 (Gabbett, 2016)
Pre & Post TrainingPlayer Height (cm) Weight (kg) Body Fat (%)Player A 186 78.4 6.7CMJ 20m AR AL YoYo 1RM
BP1Rm Sqt
23.45 3.3 8.7 8.4 31 95 110
Player Height (cm) Weight (kg) Body Fat (%)Player A 186 80.2 6.3CMJ 20m AR AL YoYo 1RM
BP1Rm Sqt
24.60 3.14 8.3 8.5 24 97.5 115
RecommendationsMore focus on in-session conditioning drills to
maintain high endurance capacitiesPurchase of GPS monitors to assist in load monitoringHR Monitors used more frequently to ensure physical
loading is closely monitoredDevelopment of Agility based movements to
supplement those completed on-field, and reduce Arrowhead time in testing
Begin to ‘feel’ successful lifting in the gym.
ReferencesAndrzejewski, M., Chmura, J., Pluta, B., & Konarski, J. M. (2015). Sprinting Activities And Distance Covered By Top Level Europa League Soccer Players. International Journal Of Sports Science & Coaching, 10(1), 39–50.
Bangsbo, J., Mohr, M., & Krustrup, P. (2006). Physical And Metabolic Demands Of Training And Match-play In The Elite Football Player. Journal Of Sports Sciences, 24(7), 665–674. Http://Doi.Org/10.1080/02640410500482529
Bompa, T. (1999). Periodization: Theory And Methodology Of Training (4th Ed.). Leeds: Human Kinetics.
Bujnovsky, D., Maly, T., Zahalka, F., & Mala, L. (2015). Analysis Of Physical Load Among Professional Soccer Players During Matches With Respect To Field Position. Journal Of Physical Education & Sport, 15(3), 569–575.
Cook, G., Burton, L., Hoogenboom, B. J., & Voight, M. (2014). Functional Movement Screening: The Use Of Fundamental Movements As An Assessment Of Function - Part 1. International Journal Of Sports Physical Therapy, 9(3), 396–409.
Gabbett, T. J. (2016). The Training-injury Prevention Paradox: Should Athletes Be Training Smarter And Harder? British Journal Of Sports Medicine. Http://Doi.Org/10.1136/Bjsports-2015-095788
Gioldasis Aristotelis, Bekris Evangelos, & Gissis Ioannis. (2014). Playing Position: Anthropometric And Fitness Demands In Youth Soccer. Sport Science Review, 23(3-4), 151. Http://Doi.Org/10.2478/Ssr-2014-0009
Junge, A., & Dvorak, J. (2004). Soccer Injuries. Sports Medicine, 34(13), 929–938. Http://Doi.Org/10.2165/00007256-200434130-00004
Read, P. J., Oliver, J. L., De Ste Croix, M. B. A., Myer, G. D., & Lloyd, R. S. (2016). Assessment Of Injury Risk Factors In Male Youth Soccer Players. Strength & Conditioning Journal (Lippincott Williams & Wilkins), 38(1), 12–21.
Rosenblatt, B., Joyce, D., & Lewingdon, D. (2014). Planning A Performance Program. In High Performance Training For Sports (Vol. 1, Pp. 247–259). Leeds: Human Kinetics.
Verkhoshansky, Y., & Siff, M. (2009). Supertraining (6th Ed., Vol. 1). Rome: Verkhoshansky SSTM.