Upload
adi-eyal
View
212
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Â
Citation preview
In 2011 national performance assessment frameworks wereroutinely used by the agency to assess progress in 86% of IHP+countries where they exist. Target = 100%.
In 2011 92% of health sector aid was provided by the agencythrough multi-year commitments - an increase from 79%. Target =90%.
In 2011 85% of health sector aid provided by the agency usednational public financial management systems - a decrease from94%. Target = 33% reduction in aid not using PFM systems (with ≥80% using country systems).
Insufficient data has been provided to enable a rating for the healthsector aid provided by the agency that used country procurementsystems.
In , evidence exists in 62% of IHP+ countries that the agencysupported civil society engagement in health sector policyprocesses. Target = 100%.
In 2011 the agency participated in health sector mutualassessments of progress in 100% of IHP+ countries where theyexist. Target = 100%.
In 2011 100% of capacity development was provided by theagency through coordinated programmes - an increase from88.3%. Target = 50.0%.
In 2011 60% of health sector aid was provided by the agencythrough programme based approaches - an increase from 34%.Target = 66%.
An IHP+ Country Compact or equivalent has been signed by theagency in 100% of IHP+ countries where they exist. Target =100%.
In 2011 57% of health sector aid was reported by the agency onnational health sector budgets - an increase from 37%. Target =50% reduction in aid not on budget (with ≥ 85% on budget).
In 2011 the stock of parallel project implementation units (PIUs)used by the agency in the surveyed countries was 11.0 - adecrease from 23.0. Target = 66% reduction in stock of PIUs.
In 2011 104% of health sector aid disbursements provided by theagency were released according to agreed schedules - anincrease from 31% in 2007. Target = 71%.
Burundi Ethiopia Mozambique Nepal Nigeria Rwanda Sierra Leone Uganda
The Department for International Development (DFID) leadsthe UK government’s fight against world poverty working withnational and international partners. DFID remains committedto ensuring its support for health is in line with aideffectiveness principles and to supporting countries’ ownefforts to strengthen health systems and services.
2005/72005/7
20112011
100%100%
2005/72005/7
20112011
85%85%
2005/72005/7
20112011
50%50%
2005/72005/7
20112011
66%66%
2005/72005/7
20112011
90%90%
2005/72005/7
20112011
71%71%
NO DATA
2005/72005/7
20112011
80%80%
2005/72005/7
20112011
80%80%
2005/72005/7
20112011
2005/72005/7
20112011
100%100%
2005/72005/7
20112011
100%100%
2005/72005/7
100%100%
2012 PARTNER SCORECARD FOR United Kingdom
ORGANISATION PROFILE IHP+RESULTS COUNTRIES WHERE THE ORGANISATION IS ACTIVE
EXPECTED RESULTS RATING TARGET OVERALL PROGRESS
Commitments aredocumented and mutuallyagreed.
Support is based incountry plans andstrategies, including tostrengthen HealthSystems.
Funding commitments arelong-term.
Funds are disbursedpredictably, as committed.
Country systems forprocurement and publicfinancial management areused and strengthened.
Resources are beingmanaged for DevelopmentResults.
Mutual accountability isbeing demonstrated.
Civil Society meaningfullyengaged.
target achieved no progress or regressionprogress made towards achieving target data not provided measure not applicable indicates agreed target
Lower values are better
*
*Performance is assessed in only Niger, Rwanda, Senegal, Sierra Leone and Uganda. Budget support is also not counted. The rating may therefore not fully reflect progress, and could be an underestimate.
Prod
uced
by
the
inde
pend
ent N
orth
-Sou
th C
onso
rtium
for I
HP+
Resu
lts, m
anda
ted
by IH
P+ G
loba
l Com
pact
sig
nato
ries.
See
ww
w.ih
pres
ults
.net
Desig
n lic
ense
d w
ith C
reat
ive
Com
mon
s w
ith s
ome
rest
rictio
ns, 2
010
The aggregate figures for these measures mask a significant disparity across countries. Specifically, the scores for Nigeria, whereDFID’s health programme is significant, reduce the overall level of performance. DFID is working with the Nigerian authorities tostrengthen country systems and frameworks to provide sufficient assurance for greater alignment from development partners.
Data challenges have meant that producing a credible measure of performance has not been possible. In the countries for which thismeasure applies – Rwanda, Uganda and Sierra Leone – a significant portion of DFID support will use country systems since budgetsupport is used. DFID will work with partners to better establish approaches to capture this.
SPECIFIC ACTIONS TO ACHIEVE RESULTS
This additional information is reported by the Organisation to explain what specific actions it is taking to implement its IHP+ commitments to the8 Expected Results, or to qualify its measures of progress.
HOW TO INTERPRET THIS SCORECARDExpected Results reflect key commitments that were made by IHP+ signatories in the IHP+ Global Compact. Each expected result hascorresponding standard performance measures to track progress over time. The progress of all agencies is rated against these mutuallyagreed expectations.Rating symbols illustrate whether the Agency has achieved , is working towards , or has not achieved its targets overthe most recent annual reporting cycle. Details of these independent assessments undertaken by the IHP+Results Consortium can befound online in the North-South Observatory for IHP+Results (www.ihpresults.net).Target describes the aggregate data on which the Rating is based, with a comparison of 2011 and baseline performance.Overall Progress shows a two-bar graph with the aggregate data for the agency in question across all the countries for which healthsector support has been reported. In most cases, the agreed target for each standard performance measure (SPM) is shown as a redline.Scorecard ratings are aggregates of performance across a number of countries. Aggregates might hide variations in the agency'sperformance. Disaggregated data can be found at www.ihpresults.netNB: The ratings presented here are based on self-reported data. IHP+Results has taken steps to triangulate this data using othersources. More details are vailable at www.ihpresults.net