2
In 2011 national performance assessment frameworks were routinely used by the agency to assess progress in 86% of IHP+ countries where they exist. Target = 100%. In 2011 92% of health sector aid was provided by the agency through multi-year commitments - an increase from 79%. Target = 90%. In 2011 85% of health sector aid provided by the agency used national public financial management systems - a decrease from 94%. Target = 33% reduction in aid not using PFM systems (with ≥ 80% using country systems). Insufficient data has been provided to enable a rating for the health sector aid provided by the agency that used country procurement systems. In , evidence exists in 62% of IHP+ countries that the agency supported civil society engagement in health sector policy processes. Target = 100%. In 2011 the agency participated in health sector mutual assessments of progress in 100% of IHP+ countries where they exist. Target = 100%. In 2011 100% of capacity development was provided by the agency through coordinated programmes - an increase from 88.3%. Target = 50.0%. In 2011 60% of health sector aid was provided by the agency through programme based approaches - an increase from 34%. Target = 66%. An IHP+ Country Compact or equivalent has been signed by the agency in 100% of IHP+ countries where they exist. Target = 100%. In 2011 57% of health sector aid was reported by the agency on national health sector budgets - an increase from 37%. Target = 50% reduction in aid not on budget (with ≥ 85% on budget). In 2011 the stock of parallel project implementation units (PIUs) used by the agency in the surveyed countries was 11.0 - a decrease from 23.0. Target = 66% reduction in stock of PIUs. In 2011 104% of health sector aid disbursements provided by the agency were released according to agreed schedules - an increase from 31% in 2007. Target = 71%. Burundi Ethiopia Mozambique Nepal Nigeria Rwanda Sierra Leone Uganda The Department for International Development (DFID) leads the UK government’s fight against world poverty working with national and international partners. DFID remains committed to ensuring its support for health is in line with aid effectiveness principles and to supporting countries’ own efforts to strengthen health systems and services. 2005/7 2005/7 2011 2011 100% 100% 2005/7 2005/7 2011 2011 85% 85% 2005/7 2005/7 2011 2011 50% 50% 2005/7 2005/7 2011 2011 66% 66% 2005/7 2005/7 2011 2011 90% 90% 2005/7 2005/7 2011 2011 71% 71% NO DATA 2005/7 2005/7 2011 2011 80% 80% 2005/7 2005/7 2011 2011 80% 80% 2005/7 2005/7 2011 2011 2005/7 2005/7 2011 2011 100% 100% 2005/7 2005/7 2011 2011 100% 100% 2005/7 2005/7 100% 100% 2012 PARTNER SCORECARD FOR United Kingdom ORGANISATION PROFILE IHP+RESULTS COUNTRIES WHERE THE ORGANISATION IS ACTIVE EXPECTED RESULTS RATING TARGET OVERALL PROGRESS Commitments are documented and mutually agreed. Support is based in country plans and strategies, including to strengthen Health Systems. Funding commitments are long-term. Funds are disbursed predictably, as committed. Country systems for procurement and public financial management are used and strengthened. Resources are being managed for Development Results. Mutual accountability is being demonstrated. Civil Society meaningfully engaged. target achieved no progress or regression progress made towards achieving target data not provided measure not applicable indicates agreed target Lower values are better * *Performance is assessed in only Niger, Rwanda, Senegal, Sierra Leone and Uganda. Budget support is also not counted. The rating may therefore not fully reflect progress, and could be an underestimate.

DocumentUK

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

 

Citation preview

In 2011 national performance assessment frameworks wereroutinely used by the agency to assess progress in 86% of IHP+countries where they exist. Target = 100%.

In 2011 92% of health sector aid was provided by the agencythrough multi-year commitments - an increase from 79%. Target =90%.

In 2011 85% of health sector aid provided by the agency usednational public financial management systems - a decrease from94%. Target = 33% reduction in aid not using PFM systems (with ≥80% using country systems).

Insufficient data has been provided to enable a rating for the healthsector aid provided by the agency that used country procurementsystems.

In , evidence exists in 62% of IHP+ countries that the agencysupported civil society engagement in health sector policyprocesses. Target = 100%.

In 2011 the agency participated in health sector mutualassessments of progress in 100% of IHP+ countries where theyexist. Target = 100%.

In 2011 100% of capacity development was provided by theagency through coordinated programmes - an increase from88.3%. Target = 50.0%.

In 2011 60% of health sector aid was provided by the agencythrough programme based approaches - an increase from 34%.Target = 66%.

An IHP+ Country Compact or equivalent has been signed by theagency in 100% of IHP+ countries where they exist. Target =100%.

In 2011 57% of health sector aid was reported by the agency onnational health sector budgets - an increase from 37%. Target =50% reduction in aid not on budget (with ≥ 85% on budget).

In 2011 the stock of parallel project implementation units (PIUs)used by the agency in the surveyed countries was 11.0 - adecrease from 23.0. Target = 66% reduction in stock of PIUs.

In 2011 104% of health sector aid disbursements provided by theagency were released according to agreed schedules - anincrease from 31% in 2007. Target = 71%.

Burundi Ethiopia Mozambique Nepal Nigeria Rwanda Sierra Leone Uganda

The Department for International Development (DFID) leadsthe UK government’s fight against world poverty working withnational and international partners. DFID remains committedto ensuring its support for health is in line with aideffectiveness principles and to supporting countries’ ownefforts to strengthen health systems and services.

2005/72005/7

20112011

100%100%

2005/72005/7

20112011

85%85%

2005/72005/7

20112011

50%50%

2005/72005/7

20112011

66%66%

2005/72005/7

20112011

90%90%

2005/72005/7

20112011

71%71%

NO DATA

2005/72005/7

20112011

80%80%

2005/72005/7

20112011

80%80%

2005/72005/7

20112011

2005/72005/7

20112011

100%100%

2005/72005/7

20112011

100%100%

2005/72005/7

100%100%

2012 PARTNER SCORECARD FOR United Kingdom

ORGANISATION PROFILE IHP+RESULTS COUNTRIES WHERE THE ORGANISATION IS ACTIVE

EXPECTED RESULTS RATING TARGET OVERALL PROGRESS

Commitments aredocumented and mutuallyagreed.

Support is based incountry plans andstrategies, including tostrengthen HealthSystems.

Funding commitments arelong-term.

Funds are disbursedpredictably, as committed.

Country systems forprocurement and publicfinancial management areused and strengthened.

Resources are beingmanaged for DevelopmentResults.

Mutual accountability isbeing demonstrated.

Civil Society meaningfullyengaged.

target achieved no progress or regressionprogress made towards achieving target data not provided measure not applicable indicates agreed target

Lower values are better

*

*Performance is assessed in only Niger, Rwanda, Senegal, Sierra Leone and Uganda. Budget support is also not counted. The rating may therefore not fully reflect progress, and could be an underestimate.

Prod

uced

by

the

inde

pend

ent N

orth

-Sou

th C

onso

rtium

for I

HP+

Resu

lts, m

anda

ted

by IH

P+ G

loba

l Com

pact

sig

nato

ries.

See

ww

w.ih

pres

ults

.net

Desig

n lic

ense

d w

ith C

reat

ive

Com

mon

s w

ith s

ome

rest

rictio

ns, 2

010

The aggregate figures for these measures mask a significant disparity across countries. Specifically, the scores for Nigeria, whereDFID’s health programme is significant, reduce the overall level of performance. DFID is working with the Nigerian authorities tostrengthen country systems and frameworks to provide sufficient assurance for greater alignment from development partners.

Data challenges have meant that producing a credible measure of performance has not been possible. In the countries for which thismeasure applies – Rwanda, Uganda and Sierra Leone – a significant portion of DFID support will use country systems since budgetsupport is used. DFID will work with partners to better establish approaches to capture this.

SPECIFIC ACTIONS TO ACHIEVE RESULTS

This additional information is reported by the Organisation to explain what specific actions it is taking to implement its IHP+ commitments to the8 Expected Results, or to qualify its measures of progress.

HOW TO INTERPRET THIS SCORECARDExpected Results reflect key commitments that were made by IHP+ signatories in the IHP+ Global Compact. Each expected result hascorresponding standard performance measures to track progress over time. The progress of all agencies is rated against these mutuallyagreed expectations.Rating symbols illustrate whether the Agency has achieved , is working towards , or has not achieved its targets overthe most recent annual reporting cycle. Details of these independent assessments undertaken by the IHP+Results Consortium can befound online in the North-South Observatory for IHP+Results (www.ihpresults.net).Target describes the aggregate data on which the Rating is based, with a comparison of 2011 and baseline performance.Overall Progress shows a two-bar graph with the aggregate data for the agency in question across all the countries for which healthsector support has been reported. In most cases, the agreed target for each standard performance measure (SPM) is shown as a redline.Scorecard ratings are aggregates of performance across a number of countries. Aggregates might hide variations in the agency'sperformance. Disaggregated data can be found at www.ihpresults.netNB: The ratings presented here are based on self-reported data. IHP+Results has taken steps to triangulate this data using othersources. More details are vailable at www.ihpresults.net