UK Political Parties

ARE CITIZENS IN BRITAIN DISENGAGED FROM THE

POLITICAL SYSTEM?

2

Key texts

• Anthony King, The British Constitution

• James Morrison, Public Affairs• Coalition Agreement• Chris Mullins, Decline and Fall • Richard Heffernan, Philip Cowley &

Colin Hay, Developments in British Politics

• Tony Wright, Doing Politics

3

Democracy

• System of government by elected representatives where parliament is made up of freely elected representatives who represent the will of the people; a government that reflects the will of the people and is answerable to an elected legislature (or is separately elected).

• Independent judiciary • Rights: freedom of

expression/opinion/association

4

Main Political Parties in UK

• Conservative & Unionist Party (full title but it is rarely used. Tories (alternative name for Conservatives)

• Natural party of government (most of 20c)• ‘One Nation Toryism – post-war consensus • Margaret Thatcher swung the party back to a

more right wing free market approach to the economy and welfare

• Cameron – modernised the party but adhered to Thatcherite principles with a determination to shrink the state

• Cameron faced with rebellious backbenchers

•

5

Labour Party

• Born out of the trade union movement post industrial revolution

• Socialist roots/Social democracy• Clause Four – public ownership means of

production (ditched by Tony Blair in 1995)• Mixed Economy • Gang of Four broke away (SDP later to join Liberal

Party to form Liberal Democrats)• Blairite – New Labour in power from 1997 - 2010• Beyond New Labour • Ed Miliband – One Nation Labour 2012, predatory

capitalism 2011

6

Liberal Democrats

• Federal party• Traditionally centrist• Pro-welfare state but also belief in free markets• Appealed to left and right• Orange Book (current Lib Dem leadership)

collection of essays stressing free market• Had positioned itself to the left of Labour on

issues such as war in Iraq and tuition fees but now in Coalition with Conservatives. First time in power for eighty years

• Liberal Democrats being punished by the electorate – slump in party fortunes

7

Margaret Thatcher/Tony Blair

• Thatcher changed the political landscape and the country

• Was eventually forced out – won 3 terms• Blair changed his party but largely

accepted the Thatcherite accommodation. First term brought in devolution (he was always lukewarm)

• successful interventions in Bosnia and Sierra Leone in the shadow of the war in Iraq

• Only Labour leader to secure victory 3 times

• Left before his term was up

8

Thatcher’s last speech in the House of Commons

• http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rv5t6rC6yvg

9

Blair’s last day

• http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0uZYINkajlY

10

Choosing a leader - Conservatives

• Candidates put their names up – voted on by MPs until left with two

• David Cameron and David Davis fought six week campaign to win a postal ballot of 253,600 Conservative members.

• Cameron had support of the membership and the Parliamentary party

11

Choosing a leader – Labour

• After a long campaign with hustings by all the candidates Ed Miliband was chosen by an electoral college

• He won by1% from former foreign secretary David after second, third and fourth preference votes came into play.

• Ed Balls was third, Andy Burnham fourth and Diane Abbott last in the ballot of MPs, members and trade unionists.

12

How they voted

• Round 1: David Miliband 37.78%, Ed Miliband 34.33% Diane Abbott eliminated

• Round 2: David Miliband 38.89%, Ed Miliband 37.47%. Andy Burnham eliminated

• Round 3: David Miliband 42.72%, Ed Miliband 41.26%, Ed Balls eliminated

• Round 4: David Miliband 49.35%, Ed Miliband 50.65%. Ed Miliband wins.

13

How they voted

• David won a majority of support from Labour's MPs at Westminster and party members, but Ed was ahead among members of trade unions and affiliated organisations in Labour's electoral college voting system.

• After four rounds of voting Ed Miliband won with 175,519 votes, while David Miliband received 147,220 votes.

14

Liberal Democrats - Nick Clegg

• Mr Clegg, an ex-journalist and former Euro MP, won 20,988 votes

• Chris Huhne won 20,477 votes cast

15

Liberal Democrats

• Nick Clegg is the party's third leader in two years

• Charles Kennedy quit in January 2006, forced out by a frontbench rebellion after admitting a drink problem.

• Sir Menzies resigned in October, blaming an age-obsessed media.

16

Conservatives

• Cameron followed 3 leaders – William Hague – never got over photo ops – wearing a baseball hat and drinking from a coconut at Notting Hill Carnival, 2001 campaign – Save the Pound

• Ian Duncan Smith – told conference the quiet man was turning up the volume within weeks he was out

• Michael Howard despite a coronation – suffered from Anne Widdecombe’s comment while he was Home Secretary as ‘something of the night about him’

17

Party machines

• Day to day bureaucracy – organising conferences etc. Come into play at election times

• Campaigning• Air wars – appealing to the voters

through the airwaves• Ground wars – Getting the vote out

mobilising on the ground

18

Funding

• Opposition parties in Parliament receive some funding to carry out their duties

• Debate over whether there should be state funding for parties

• Conservatives – receive donations from business

• Labour largely from trade unions• Liberal Democrats – seek money

from business as well

19

Funding raising

• Party machines seek to raise money • Funding a vexed question• Conservatives – Ashcroft millions

(see Morrison p154) • Blair controversial donation from

Bernie Ecclestone at the beginning of his tenure (ibid)

20

controversies

• Lobbygate – cash for questions• Cash for honours (loans for peerages)• In the event no charges brought. • MPs expenses scandal • Tory vice chairman selling access to PM for

donations • http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-175

07447• And Labour sell themselves • http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h-fmR0

hy1gM

21

Democracy in action in South Africa …

… and Britain

22

BRITAIN’S ‘CRISIS OF ENGAGEMENT’: POLITICIANS

Helena Kennedy (2006)We need to “… save British democracy from

meltdown”

David Cameron (May 2006)“ … our democratic system isn't working … public

faith in our political institutions is draining away and being replaced by a progressive and debilitating alienation.”

23

The Coalition’s view

• “The Government believes that our political system is broken. We urgently need fundamental political reform, including a referendum on electoral reform, much greater co-operation across party lines, and changes to our political system to make it far more transparent and accountable.”

(Coalition Agreement May 2010)

24

Political Reform (Coalition Agreement)

• Fixed term Parliaments

• Referendum on the voting system (went against AV)

• Recall of MPs – allow voters to force a by-election where an MP is found to have engaged in serious wrongdoing and having had a petition calling for a by-election signed by 10% of his or her constituents

• http://www.parliament.uk/business/committees/committees-a-z/commons-select/political-and-constitutional-reform-committee/news/recal-gov-response/

25

Clegg loses out

• Nick Clegg lost out on the PR referendum

• Lost out on House of Lords reform• Boundary changes in the balance

(Clegg blocked the move)

26

Clegg loses out on House of Lords reform

• http://web.orange.co.uk/article/news/clegg_lib_dems_not_pursuing_lords_reform

27

WHAT IS POLITICAL ENGAGEMENT?

BEHAVIOUR

• Voting• Member of party• Member of group• Go on march• Write to MP• Boycott goods• Donate money

ATTITUDES

• Support for political system

• Support for political actors/institutions

• Political interest

28

ARE PEOPLE MOVING AWAY FROM ELECTORAL POLITICS?

Fuel protests (2000)Countryside march (2002): 400,000Iraq war march (2003): 1,000,000

Make Poverty History (2005): 200,000Occupy movements

29

30

31

TRUST IN GOVERNMENT

“How much do you trust British governments of any party to place the needs of the nation above the interests of their own political party? - Just about always - Most of the time - Only some of the time - Almost never”

32

Possible reasons

• War in Iraq?• Expenses scandal?• Single issue politics?• Decline in trade unions?• Voting system?• “Queasy ride on the ideological big-

dipper”• ‘Them and us’ syndrome• Feelings of Powerlessness

33

Electorate want moderation

• A large majority were somewhere in the political ‘centre’ – or, at any rate, not at either extreme. A few held genuinely centrist views. The views of others were an untidy mixture of left – and right-wing views...Most voters, perhaps nearly all, instinctively inclined towards moderation.

(King, The British Constitution p 75)

34

Power Commission

• The disquiet is really about having no say. It is about feeling disconnected because voting once every four or five years does not feel like real engagement...Politics and government are increasingly slipping back into the hands of privileged elites as if democracy has run out of steam...

• Developments in British Politics p161/2

35

36

37

38

MPs didn’t get it

• http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=REuoK-VS7iI

• http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/8045384.stm

39

40

41

And those that did

• “A massive new feeding frenzy. The Telegraph has got its hands on a computer disc of our unexpurgated expenses and his morning it has begun to publish highlights. Page after unedifying page...The damage is incalculable. Not just to us, but to the entire parliamentary system. We are sinking in a great swamp of derision and loathing.”

(Chris Mullin Decline and Fall, p 327)

42

Expenses – anger but voters still turned out

• Despite fears that the MPs expenses scandal of the previous year would engender widespread cynicism amongst the electorate – and thus a reluctance to vote at all - turnout increased by four points to 65.3%. A. Park, J. Curtice, K. Thomson, M. Phillips, E. Clery and S. Butt (eds), British Social Attitudes: The 26th Report (London: Sage, 2010).

43

Voters changed their mind on MPs caught up in the

scandal

44

Ipsos Mori research

• Impact of the expenses scandal recedes

• Published:4 April 2010 • Fieldwork:19 - 22 March 2010 • Theme: Politicians

45

Turnout – an explanation

• Between 1922 and 1997 turnout had never been lower than 70%, before falling precipitately to just 59% in 2001 and 61% in 2005. While the anticipated closeness of the election (2010) outcome might have helped bring some voters to the polls, it would appear that the British electorate can no longer be relied upon to vote simply out of duty or habit.

46

47

48

TRUST IN GOVERNMENT: BRITAIN, 1973-2005

0

20

40

60

80

100

1973

1987

1994

1997

2000

2002

2005%

Some of time/Almost never

Most of time/Almost always

Source: Bromley & Curtice (2001); British Social Attitudes

49

POLITICAL INTEREST IN BRITAIN, 1973-2005

0

20

40

60

80

100

%

1973 1991 1995 1997 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005

'Very' or 'fairly' interested

Source: Electoral Commission, Audit of Political Engagement (2004, 2005, 2006)

50

TURNOUT ACROSS WESTERN EUROPE, 1945-2003

Declined

• Austria• Finland• France• Ireland• Luxembourg• Netherlands• Portugal• Spain• Switzerland• United Kingdom

Stayed same

• Belgium• Denmark• Germany• Greece• Iceland• Norway• Sweden

Source: International IDEA

51

EXPLAINING TURNOUT DECLINE

FEATURE OF CITIZENS

• Citizens less interested in politics than before

• Citizens less trusting in politicians than before

FEATURE OF ELECTIONS

• Bland parties• Uncompetitive elections

52

POLITICAL TRUST AND TURNOUT: 1997 AND 2001

-20

0

20

40

60

80

100

% o

r %

pt

chan

ge

Voted 1997

Voted 2001

Change

Source: Bromley & Curtice (2001) Table 7.11

High trustMedium

trust Low trust

53

ELECTORAL COMPETITIVENESS AND TURNOUT, 1964-2005

40

50

60

70

80

90

1964

1966

1970

1974

1974

1979

1983

1987

1992

1997

2001

2005

Tur

nout

(%

)

Source: Curtice (2005) Table 2

10%16%

20%14%

5%

% Average opinion poll lead

1%

54

OTHER EXPLANATIONS OF DECLINING TURNOUT

POWER inquiry (2006; chs2-3)• Citizens lack influence over political decisions• Parties not responsive to public demands

Kellner (2004)• Politics seen as irrelevant; doesn’t deliver what

people want• Politics seen as ‘phoney’; politicians don’t tell

people the truth.

55

FORMS OF NON-ELECTORAL PARTICIPATION

Individual/Non-active• Donate money• Boycott goods; buy ethical goods• Sign petition

Individual/Active• Contact MP or media

Collective/Active• Go on demonstration• Attend political meeting or group

56

FREQUENCY OF NON-ELECTORAL PARTICIPATION,

2000Individual / Non-active• Donate money• Signed petition

62%42%

Individual / Active• Contacted public official• Contacted the media

25% 9%

Collective / Active• Raised money for organisation• Gone on demonstration

30% 5%

Source: Pattie et al, 2004: Table 3.1

57

NON-ELECTORAL AND ELECTORAL PARTICIPATION

Turnout in 2001 election• 3+ protest actions = 80%• No protest actions = 65%

Turnout among young (<35 years) • 3+ protest actions = 58%• No protest actions = 46%

Source: Curtice and Seyd, 2003

58

CONCLUSION: CONCERN OR OPTIMISM?

CONCERN OPTIMISM

Declining political trust

Interest in politics still high

Declining turnout Non-voting due to weak electoral competition

Increasing non-electoral participation

Skewed to the better resourced

Abandoning ballot box for direct participation?

Protest is supplement to, not replacement for, voting

59

60

What for the future?

• reading Ch 9 Anti-Politics in Britain, Developments in British Politics

• Are citizens in Britain becoming disengaged from politics? And what are the consequences?