Upload
vunga
View
215
Download
3
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Uhde India Pvt. Ltd.
Page 1 of 5
ADDENDUM-1 Tender / Enq. No.: U6509-3060/ABM Item: Cooling Tower Package (143-X402) Project No.: 66-6509-700 Client: Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited, Mahul The following notes supersede the related tender clauses and also become the part of tender document.
A) Commercial Points: 1) Due date for submission of bids shall be 12:00 hrs. of 14/10/2010. Technical and un priced
commercial bids shall be opened at 13:30 hrs. of due date. 2) Bidders to note that no tax exemption or concessional duty is available for the project and
contractor shall pay all taxes and duties as per the prevalent tax tariffs. 3) Overall Liability: Overall liability of the Vendor / Contractor on all accounts whatsoever under
the Contract should not exceed 100% of the contract value plus taxes & duties. All other warranties /guaranteed/ liabilities other than as specifically stated shall be excluded.
4) Revised format for submitting prices:
Sl. No. Item Value
1 Basic lump sum price for entire package as per scope of work (In Words: _________________________________)
2 VAT @ ____ % 3 Service Tax @ ____ %
4 Mandatory CENVAT benefit on account of Excise Duty offered (In words: ___________________________________)
5 Guaranteed utility consumptions:
A Power (KWH/Hr)
Bidder’s prices shall be loaded for bid evaluation with the unit rates for the guaranteed utility consumption figures confirmed in the price bid as per the unit rates for utilities indicated in the Design Basis attached with the technical specification.
The additional cost to be loaded for bid evaluation shall be calculated as Additional cost to be loaded = Utility Cost per hr X 8000hrs X 5
Uhde India Pvt. Ltd.
Page 2 of 5
Vendor shall attain utilities consumption within the guaranteed figure quoted against sub-package under question. In case utilities consumption actually attained is higher than 100% of guaranteed figure then Vendor shall have the option of rectifying the defect at their own cost to achieve guaranteed utilities consumption. However if they fail to attain the same even after attempted rectification then they will pay penalty at the rate of 1% of total order value for each 1% excess Utilities consumption above 100 %. The maximum liability in the above case shall however not exceed 5% of total order value.
5) Octrai Charges:
Octrio charges deemed to be included in the lump sum price quoted. No octrai payment shall be done by BPCL.
6) Test, Commissioning and possession of Works:
In case Mechanical Completion is not achieved within the contractual Mechanical completion date due to delay attributable to BPCL then: Upto 4 months delay beyond the scheduled Mechanical Completion period, BPCL shall provide necessary extensions of time without any financial implication on BPCL. For more than 4 months delay beyond the contractual Mechanical Completion period for the reasons attributable to BPCL, the price and completion period for the remaining work will be negotiated and mutually agreed.
“In case start of pre-commissioning & commissioning are delayed beyond two (2) months from the date of Mechanical Completion, due to reasons attributable to BPCL, Engineer-in-charge shall issue a Provisional Completion Certificate and balance payments of 5% (of supply and construction portion) against plant completion and commissioning shall be released against submission of bank guarantee of equivalent amount valid for six (6) months. This bank guarantee shall be released after the expiry of six (6) months.”
“In case performance test run is delayed beyond six (6) months from the date of Commissioning, due to reasons attributable to BPCL, balance payments of 10% of construction portion against Guarantee Run Test and 10% against Guarantee Test Run, shall be released against submission of bank guarantee of equivalent amount valid for six (6) months. This bank guarantee shall be released after the expiry of six (6) months. The contractor shall demobilize from the site and shall remobilize at mutually agreed extra cost to BPCL account for assistance during pre-commissioning, commissioning and PGTR at a later date.
Uhde India Pvt. Ltd.
Page 3 of 5
7) Bidders to submit STATEMENT OF DEVIATIONS/ ACCEPTANCE TO TENDER DOCUMENTS, TECHNICAL DEVIATION SHEET, COMMERCIAL DEVIATION SHEET as per formats indicated below,
PROFORMA OF DEVIATION LIST
UDHE INDIA PVT LTD (Project No.: 66-6509)
STATEMENT OF DEVIATIONS/ ACCEPTANCE TO TENDER DOCUMENTS
UIPL Enquiry Ref. No. : Item: Vendor Name: Vendor Offer No. & Date:
A) Technical Documents - Sr. No.
Name Of Document
Document No. (Please mention document nos.)
Acceptance (strikeout which ever is not applicable)
1 Engineering Specifications Accepted without deviation / Accepted with
deviations, refer deviation sheet
B ) Commercial Documents – Sr. No. Name Of Document Acceptance (strikeout which ever is not applicable)
1 General Conditions of contract
Accepted without deviation / Accepted with deviations, refer deviation sheet
2 Special Conditions of Contract
Accepted without deviation / Accepted with deviations, refer deviation sheet
3 Instructions to Bidders Accepted without deviation / Accepted with deviations, refer deviation sheet
Stamp & Signature of Bidder : Date :
Uhde India Pvt. Ltd.
Page 4 of 5
UDHE INDIA PVT LTD (Project No.: 66-6509)
TECHNICAL DEVIATION SHEET
UIPL Enquiry Ref. No. : Item: Vendor Name: Vendor Offer No. & Date: Sr. No.
Name and number of Document Page no. Clause
Sr. no. Deviation
1
Stamp & Signature of Bidder: Date:
UDHE INDIA PVT LTD (Project No.: 66-6509)
COMMERCIAL DEVIATION SHEET
UIPL Enquiry Ref. No. : Item: Vendor Name: Vendor Offer No. & Date: Sr. No. Name of Document Page no. Clause
Sr. no. Deviation
1
Stamp & Signature of Bidder: Date:
Uhde India Pvt. Ltd.
Page 5 of 5
8) All other commercial terms and conditions of the tender remain unchanged.
B) Technical Points: Technical specification shall be considered superseded and revised by bidders.
Sr. No. Document No. Document Title Superseded
Revision Superseded
By Remarks
1 6509-PE-EC-00108 Tech Specs. For Cooling Tower
143-X402 00 01
2 6509-PE-FB-00251 P&ID for cooling tower 02 03
3
Geotechnical Engineering
report For CCR plant of
BPCL-Mahul.
Added
4 6509-CI-LB-00002 Location of soil
test and bore holes
Added
Following electrical points are added:
1. As per the Technical Specifications, scope for Power Cables for Cooling Tower fan motors is divided into two parts, viz., from substation to power JB (To be located by Cooling Tower vendor at grade level within the battery limit of cooling tower) and from this power JB to motor terminals. Of these the former part (substation to power JB) will be supplied, designed by others. The approx. length of the same shall be 750m. Bidder for Cooling Tower package unit to use this data for voltage drop calculation for the cable in Bidder’s scope.
2. Earthing within the Battery limit of the Cooling Tower package shall be in Vendor’s
scope. However, this shall exclude Earth Pits, if any, from Vendor’s scope of Supply as well as installation.
3. As per the GES-Electrical, LT motor ratings shall be restricted to 132kW only. Beyond
this rating motors are required to be HT motors. However, for Cooling Tower fan motor, this criterion can be relaxed provided the Cooling Tower Vendor supplies LT motor along with the Soft Starter. In the event of the same, the vendor shall consider soft starter in the scope.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................2
PROJECT DESCRIPTION..........................................................................................................2
SCOPE OF WORK.....................................................................................................................2
Field Work .............................................................................................................................. 3
Laboratory Work..................................................................................................................... 3
INVESTIGATION METHODOLOGY AND SUB-SOIL CHARACTERISTICS..............................4
Subsurface Exploration .......................................................................................................... 4
Field Investigation................................................................................................................... 5
Sampling in soils .................................................................................................................... 5
Laboratory Tests .................................................................................................................... 8
SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS..................................................................................................12
GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING REPORT
FOR CCR PLANT OF M/S. BPCL AT MAHUL
MUMBAI, MAHARASHTRA
NOBLE GEO-STRUCTS PROJECT NO. B 1102
July 20, 2010
INTRODUCTION
Noble Geo-Structs is pleased to submit our Geotechnical Engineering Report for CCR plant of
M/s. BPCL at Mahul, Mumbai, in the State of Maharashtra, India. The project was authorized by
N. A. Kande (Manager, P & CS) for Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited through their letter of
intent (LOI) no. BPCL/UIPL/CCR/N19/01 dated April 5, 2010.
The purpose of this report is to describe the subsurface conditions observed at the twenty three
test borings drilled for this study, analyze and evaluate the test data, and provide
recommendations with respect to:
• chemical nature of the sub-soil; and
• strength and stability of strata for deciding the founding level.
project description
The project involves the proposed development of CCR plant of M/s. BPCL at Mahul, Mumbai,
in the State of Maharashtra, India.
SCOPE OF WORK
Specifications of the work include drilling twenty three test bore holes at stipulated locations,
tests (in-situ and ex situ) on soil, rock and ground water samples, interpretation of test data and
test results and preparation of a geotechnical report.
Geotechnical Investigation at BPCL, Mahul Noble Geo-Structs Project No. B1102 August 10, 2010
Field Work
Field work consisted of twenty three test boreholes at stipulated locations, collecting disturbed,
undisturbed soil samples and rock samples at salient locations, conducting standard penetration
test (SPT).
Drilling at the stipulated boreholes was planned up to a sufficient depth of the rock level to
determine the competent strata for foundation design.
Six ERT test were conducted at site at stipulated locations.
Two SPLT tests were conducted at site.
Three BVT tests were conducted at site.
Four Field Dry Density tests were conducted at site.
Laboratory Work
The laboratory work scope included analysis of the soil, rock and groundwater samples from the
fieldwork for the following parameters:
A) Soil
1. Atterberg Limits
a) Liquid Limit
b) Plastic Limit
c) Shrinkage Limit
2. Natural moisture content
3. Dry density and Void ratio
4. Specific gravity of soil
5. Grain size analysis (GSA)
a) Sieve analysis
b) Hydrometer analysis
6. Triaxial Test (UU and CD)
7. Free swelling index
8. Swelling pressure test
9. Consolidation test
10. Lab California bearing ratio (CBR) test
11. Proctor Test (Standard)
Geotechnical Investigation at BPCL, Mahul Noble Geo-Structs Project No. B1102 August 10, 2010
B) Rock
1. Unit weight
2. Specific Gravity
3. Water absorption
4. Porosity
5. Unconfined Compression Test
6. Point load Index
C) Chemical analysis of soil
Chemical analysis test of soil samples including sulphate (SO3), Chloride and pH
D) Chemical analysis of water
Chemical analysis test of water samples including sulphate (SO3), Chloride, and pH
E) Foundation Recommendation
1 Depth of foundation
2 Type of foundation
3 Net safe bearing capacity
INVESTIGATION METHODOLOGY AND SUB-SOIL CHARACTERISTICS
Subsurface Exploration
The subsurface condition was evaluated through twenty three test boreholes to the required
depth. The borings were drilled using Calyx machine at the stipulated locations. The boring
depths were measured from the existing grade at the time of our field activities. The object of
site exploration is to provide reliable, specific and detailed information about the soil and rock
conditions for foundation design.
Geotechnical Investigation at BPCL, Mahul Noble Geo-Structs Project No. B1102 August 10, 2010
Field Investigation
Drilling
Core drilling was completed using rotary type boring machine with diamond bits. Casing of
150mm diameter was advanced up to the firm strata as per IS 1892-1979. In order to extract
maximum possible information and to prevent the loss of valuable sub-surface data obtained
during the drilling of rock core (NX size) indexing and storing of the cores obtained was done as
specified by IS standards.
Sampling in soils
Undisturbed soil samples
Cohesive soil samples were obtained using thin wall tube samplers, as per IS: 2132 in such a
manner that moisture content and structure of soil did not alter. The sampler was slightly oiled
from outside to reduce friction. It was then attached to the boring rod, lower to the bottom of
the hole and pressed into the soil. The sampler tubes were serially numbered immediately on
their recovery.
Disturbed soil sample
Cohesionless soil samples were obtained from boreholes at each 1 m interval or at the change
of strata whichever occurs earlier and stored as per procedure laid down by IS: 1892-1979.
These samples are used for grain size analysis; Atterberg limits tests and chemical analysis.
The samples were stored in polythene bags and numbered appropriately for proper
identification.
Standard Penetration Test on Soil
The standard penetration tests were conducted inside exploratory bore holes at depths shown
in bore logs as per the procedure stipulated in IS: 2131 - 1981. The disturbed soil sample from
tube was carefully stored to carry out further tests. The values of standard penetration blows,
N values, at various borehole locations are indicated in the respective bore logs. SPT ‘N’
values are co-related with relative density of non-cohesive stratum and with consistency of
cohesive stratum. Co-relations are tabulated in Appendix A3 “General Notes” table 1 and 2
Geotechnical Investigation at BPCL, Mahul Noble Geo-Structs Project No. B1102 August 10, 2010
Electrical Resistivity Test
The test was conducted as per IS 1892 & IS 3043
The electrical resistivity method is based on the measurement and recording of change in the
mean resistivity or apparent specific resistance of various soils. The resistivity is usually defined
as the resistance between opposite phases of a unit cube of the material. By the determination
of vertical and lateral variations in this resistance it is possible, within certain limitations, to infer
the stratification and lateral extent of subsurface deposits. Several methods involving different
electrode arrangement have been developed for making field resistivity measurements. Among
these are the Wanner, Schlumberger, and Lee Methods. Schlumberger method is commonly
utilized for most European surveys. This method is also accepted in India.
P = 2 * 3.142*DE/l
Wherein
P = Mean resistivity Ohm-m
D = Distance between the electrodes (cm)
E = Potential drop between inner electrode (V)
I = Current flowing between outer electrode (A)
Static plate load test
The static plate load test is carried out at desired. The test pit of 2 m x 2 m x 3.5m in size is dug
up to the test depth. A rigid, 25 mm thick steel plate of 600 mm x 600 mm or of desired size is
firmly seated at the center of the pit. The loads on the test plate are applied by reaction loading
method to avoid fluctuations, impact, eccentricity etc. The loading frame fabricated on ground
for this purpose, has the weight of 1 T. It is further loaded with aggregate filled gunny bags
weighing 15 T. This load is uniformly distributed over the loading frame. The hydraulic jack has
an attached pressure gauge, which is carefully calibrated. A steel ball is placed at the central
point of the jack and the frame, to ensure vertical application of the load. The pressures are
applied in suitable increments. The pressure is increased to the next higher intensity of pressure
step when no appreciable settlement is noted under the applied intensity of pressure over
considerable time interval. The settlement, of the test plate is measured with reference to an
independent steel slotted angle, anchored in the ground. The settlements are measured using
dial gauges having least count of 0.01 mm i.e. measuring to the accuracy of 0.01 mm.
Geotechnical Investigation at BPCL, Mahul Noble Geo-Structs Project No. B1102 August 10, 2010
Block Vibration Test:
Purpose of performing this test is to characterise the substrata for dynamic properties to be
used in Machine Foundation design. This test given natural frequency, damping coefficient,
shear modulus etc.
1. Block vibration test was conducted as per IS 5249 .
2. Test Pit: A test pit of size 3.0 m x 3.0 m and the depth, of 1.5m is prepared. The test is
conducted above ground. Bottom of the pit is kept perfect horizontal.
3. Test Block: A plain cement concrete block of mix M15 is cast in the test pit. Size of the block
is 3.0 m x 3.0 m x 1.5m. It is cured continuously before testing. At the time of casting,
foundation bolts are embedded into the concrete block.
4. Test Set up: Vibration oscillator is fixed on the concrete block and suitable connections are
made. The vibration pickup is fixed at the top of block, such that, it senses its vertical motion.
The vibration oscillator is excited through power amplifier, to generate purely sinusoidal
vibrations. The line of action of dynamic force passes through the centre of gravity of the
concrete block. Vibration oscillator is operated at a specified frequency through a frequency
generator. Signal of the vibration pickup is fed into the AC mili-volt meter, to measure the
amplitude of vibrating block. The frequency of oscillator is increased in steps and
corresponding amplitudes of vibration of the block are recorded, which include the maximum
amplitude, corresponding to the resonant condition. Amplitude v/s frequency response is
plotted for each excitation level (which is achieved by increasing the magnitude of dynamic
force, by increasing the current).
Geotechnical Investigation at BPCL, Mahul Noble Geo-Structs Project No. B1102 August 10, 2010
Sampling in rock
Rock cores
When rock was encountered, size of borehole was changed to NX (76mm) diameters. A
double tube and NX sized bits are used drilling and recovering rock cores. Recovered rock
cores were numbered serially and preserved in good quality sturdy wooden core boxes. Rock
Core Recovery and Rock Quality Designation (RQD) were computed for every run length
drilled. Rock samples have been selected based on the probable founding elevation of the
proposed structure.
Rock classification in terms of weathering and state of fractures and strength is carried out as in
APPENDIX A3 General Notes Table 3.
Laboratory Tests
Soil Tests
The soil samples collected from boreholes were analyzed for their physical and engineering
properties as described below:
Grain Size Analysis
A quantitative determination of the particle size distribution in the soil was made by wet sieve
analysis and sedimentation analysis using hydrometer. Procedure laid down by IS: 2720 Part –
IV were followed. The particle sizes were designated according to the scale given in IS: 1498
(Table -1).
PARTICLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION
Classification
(Identified by behaviour)
Denseness
Size of particles in mm
Coarse 80 to 20 Gravel
Fine 20 to 4.75
Coarse 4.75 to 2
Medium 2 to 0.425 Sand
Fine 0.425 to 0.075
Silt & Clay Less than 0.075
Geotechnical Investigation at BPCL, Mahul Noble Geo-Structs Project No. B1102 August 10, 2010
Specific Gravity
The specific gravity of the soil was determined by the principle of displacement of water by soil
solids. This test is determined as per test procedure laid in IS: 2720 (Part 3 and 4).
Atterberg Limits
To understand the plasticity and shrinkage characteristic of the soils, liquid limit, plastic limit and
shrinkage limits were determined. Liquid limit is the moisture content at which soil passes from
plastic stage to liquid state as determined by the liquid limit test. Plastic Limit is the moisture
content at which the soil, becomes too dry to be in a plastic condition as determined by the
Plastic Limit Test. Reduction of moisture content by drying below Shrinkage Limit is not
accompanied by decrease in volume; instead air enters the voids of the system and material
becomes unsaturated. The Liquid Limit and Plastic Limit are determined as per IS: 2720 Part - V
and Shrinkage Limit as per IS: 2720 Part VI.
Natural Moisture Content
This test shall be carried out as per IS: 2720 (Part - II).
Dry Density
Dry Density is determined on undisturbed sample only.
Triaxial Test
Triaxial Shear Tests, (Unconsolidated Undrained & Consolidated Drained), are carried on UDS
& DS samples as per IS: 2720: Part- XII.
Swelling Pressure Test
This test shall be conducted as per Draft Standard circulated by Technical Committee on
Expansive Soils (TC-6) of international Society of Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering
Evaluation of Swelling Pressure of Expansive Soil in Laboratory (circulated in November, 1990).
Geotechnical Investigation at BPCL, Mahul Noble Geo-Structs Project No. B1102 August 10, 2010
Consolidation
Consolidation test was conducted as per IS 2720 part XV
The following loading stage shall be employed 0, 0.1, 0.25, 1.0, 2.0, 4.0 and 8.0 kg/sq. cm.
From e Vs log p curves, preconsolidation pressure shall be determined to establish whether the
soil is normally consolidated or over consolidated. The point (e.p.) showing initial condition of
the soil under test must be specifically marked on the consolidation curves. Settlement
predictions based on the field virgin compression curve shall only be acceptable. The procedure
adopted in respect of obtaining compression indices from the field curve and that for computing
settlements for the type of clay under consideration shall be clearly illustrated in the report.
It is to be noted that deviations from the standard procedure of performing consolidation test
give in is 2720 are permissible in order to enable computation of settlements based on the
above procedure i.e. cycles (s) of loading unloading shall be employed wherever required.
Standard Proctor Test
Standard Proctor Test was conducted on DS samples collected from Trial Pits as per IS-2720-
1986 Part 7.
California Bearing Ratio(CBR) Test
California Bearing Ratio(CBR)Test was conducted on DS samples collected from Trial Pits as
per IS-2720-1986 Part 16.
Rock Tests:
Specific Gravity
Specific gravity was determined as per procedure laid in IS: 1122.
Porosity
Porosity was determined as per test procedure laid in IS: 1122.
Water Absorption
Water Absorption was determined as per procedure laid in IS: 1124.
Unconfined Compression test
Unconfined Compression Test was determined as per test procedure laid in IS: 9143.
Point load Index
Point load index was determined as per test procedure laid in IS: 8764
Geotechnical Investigation at BPCL, Mahul Noble Geo-Structs Project No. B1102 August 10, 2010
Chemical Analysis:
Tests on Soil
Chloride Content, Sulphate content and pH value were determined as per test procedure laid in
IS: 2720 (Part XXVI and Part XXVII).
Tests on Water
Chloride Content, Sulphate content, and pH value were determined as per test procedure laid in
IS: 3025 (Part 24 and Part 32).
Geotechnical Investigation at BPCL, Mahul Noble Geo-Structs Project No. B1102 August 10, 2010
SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS
BH No. 1
Layer I
It consists of brownish soil with murrum. It is observed from 0m to 1m below existing ground
level. SPT’s conducted at 1m depth showed N-value as refusal.
Layer II
It consists of slightly weathered amygdaloidal basalt grey. It is observed from 1m to 4m below
existing ground level. The core recovery is in the range of 46% to 54% and RQD varies from
26% to 27%. The Grade of the strata is II as per Appendix A-3, General Notes Table No.3.
Layer III
It consists of fresh basalt grey. It is observed from 4m to 13m below existing ground level. The
core recovery is in the range of 84% to 98% and RQD varies from 67% to 91%. The Grade of
the strata is I as per Appendix A-3, General Notes Table No.3.
The ground water table is struck at 3.2m below existing ground level.
The borehole is terminated at 13m below existing ground level.
Geotechnical Investigation at BPCL, Mahul Noble Geo-Structs Project No. B1102 August 10, 2010
BH No. 2
Layer I
It consists of soil with murrum. It is observed from 0m to 1.5m below existing ground level.
SPT’s conducted at 1.5m depth showed N-value as refusal.
Layer II
It consists of completely weathered basalt, grey. It is observed from 1.5m to 10m below existing
ground level. The core recovery is nil and RQD as nil. The Grade of the strata is V as per
Appendix A-3, General Notes Table No.3.
Layer III
It consists of fresh basalt grey. It is observed from 10m to 12m below existing ground level. The
core recovery is in the range of 77% to 87% and RQD varies from 8% to 59%. The Grade of the
strata is I as per Appendix A-3, General Notes Table No.3.
The ground water table is struck at 1.75m below existing ground level.
The borehole is terminated at 12m below existing ground level.
Geotechnical Investigation at BPCL, Mahul Noble Geo-Structs Project No. B1102 August 10, 2010
BH No. 3
Layer I
It consists of brownish soil with boulders. It is observed from 0m to 1m below existing ground
level. SPT’s conducted at 1m depth showed N-value as refusal.
Layer II
It consists of fresh fractured basalt grey. It is observed from 1m to 10m below existing ground
level. The core recovery is in the range of 65% to 97% and RQD varies from 33% to 81%. The
Grade of the strata is I as per Appendix A-3, General Notes Table No.3.
The ground water table is struck at 1.9m below existing ground level.
The borehole is terminated at 10m below existing ground level.
Geotechnical Investigation at BPCL, Mahul Noble Geo-Structs Project No. B1102 August 10, 2010
BH No. 4
Layer I
It consists of brownish soil with murrum. It is observed from 0m to 0.5m below existing ground
level.
Layer II
It consists of completely weathered amygdaloidal basalt, grey. It is observed from 0.5m to 7.5m
below existing ground level. SPT’s conducted at 1m depth showed N-value as refusal. The core
recovery is nil and RQD as nil. The Grade of the strata is V as per Appendix A-3, General Notes
Table No.3.
Layer III
It consists of fresh basalt grey. It is observed from 7.5m to 12m below existing ground level. The
core recovery is in the range of 91% to 98% and RQD varies from 19% to 93%. The Grade of
the strata is I as per Appendix A-3, General Notes Table No.3.
The ground water table is struck at 1.55m below existing ground level.
The borehole is terminated at 12m below existing ground level.
Geotechnical Investigation at BPCL, Mahul Noble Geo-Structs Project No. B1102 August 10, 2010
BH No. 5
Layer I
It consists of yellowish brown soil mixed with boulder. It is observed from 0m to 1.5m below
existing ground level. SPT’s conducted at 1.5m depth showed N-value as refusal.
Layer II
It consists of slightly weathered basalt grey. It is observed from 1.5m to 6m below existing
ground level. The core recovery is in the range of 41% to 43% and RQD varies from 28% to
38%. The Grade of the strata is II as per Appendix A-3, General Notes Table No.3.
Layer III
It consists of highly weathered basalt grey. It is observed from 6m to 7.5m below existing
ground level. The core recovery is 23% and RQD as 15%. The Grade of the strata is IV as per
Appendix A-3, General Notes Table No.3.
The ground water table is struck at 1.6m below existing ground level.
The borehole is terminated at 7.5m below existing ground level.
Geotechnical Investigation at BPCL, Mahul Noble Geo-Structs Project No. B1102 August 10, 2010
BH No. 6
Layer I
It consists of brownish soil with murrum. It is observed from 0m to 1.5m below existing ground
level. SPT’s conducted at 1.5m depth showed N-value as refusal.
Layer II
It consists of slightly weathered amygdaloidal basalt grey, brown. It is observed from 1.5m to 3m
below existing ground level. The core recovery is 58% and RQD as 27%. The Grade of the
strata is II as per Appendix A-3, General Notes Table No.3.
Layer III
It consists of fresh amygdaloidal basalt grey, brown. It is observed from 3m to 9m below existing
ground level. The core recovery is in the range of 61% to 94% and RQD varies from 21% to
88%. The Grade of the strata is I as per Appendix A-3, General Notes Table No.3.
The ground water table is struck at 1.6m below existing ground level.
The borehole is terminated at 9m below existing ground level.
Geotechnical Investigation at BPCL, Mahul Noble Geo-Structs Project No. B1102 August 10, 2010
BH No. 7
Layer I
It consists of brownish silty clay with gravel. It is observed from 0m to 0.5m below existing
ground level. SPT’s conducted at 0.5m depth showed N-value as refusal.
Layer II
It consists of fresh fractured basalt with white infillings grey. It is observed from 0.5m to 11m
below existing ground level. The core recovery is in the range of 75% to 99% and RQD varies
from 39% to 86%. The Grade of the strata is I as per Appendix A-3, General Notes Table No.3.
The ground water table is struck at 1.5m below existing ground level.
The borehole is terminated at 11m below existing ground level.
Geotechnical Investigation at BPCL, Mahul Noble Geo-Structs Project No. B1102 August 10, 2010
BH No. 8
Layer I
It consists of soil with boulder. It is observed from 0m to 1.5m below existing ground level.
SPT’s conducted at 1.5m depth showed N-value as refusal.
Layer II
It consists of fresh fractured basalt brown. It is observed from 1.5m to 6m below existing ground
level. The core recovery is in the range of 62% to 83% and RQD varies from 29% to 46%. The
Grade of the strata is I as per Appendix A-3, General Notes Table No.3.
Layer III
It consists of fresh amygdaloidal basalt brown. It is observed from 6m to 10.5m below existing
ground level. The core recovery is in the range of 63% to 93% and RQD varies from 48% to
89%. The Grade of the strata is I as per Appendix A-3, General Notes Table No.3.
The ground water table is struck at 2.7m below existing ground level.
The borehole is terminated at 10.5m below existing ground level.
Geotechnical Investigation at BPCL, Mahul Noble Geo-Structs Project No. B1102 August 10, 2010
BH No. 9
Layer I
It consists of soil with boulder. It is observed from 0m to 0.5m below existing ground level.
SPT’s conducted at 0.5m depth showed N-value as refusal.
Layer II
It consists of slightly weathered fractured basalt grey. It is observed from 0.5m to 2m below
existing ground level. The core recovery is 51% and RQD as 22%. The Grade of the strata is II
as per Appendix A-3, General Notes Table No.3.
Layer III
It consists of fresh amygdaloidal basalt with white infillings, grey. It is observed from 2m to
10.9m below existing ground level. The core recovery is in the range of 65% to 88% and RQD
varies from 9% to 75%. The Grade of the strata is I as per Appendix A-3, General Notes Table
No.3.
The ground water table is struck at 1.9m below existing ground level.
The borehole is terminated at 10.9m below existing ground level.
Geotechnical Investigation at BPCL, Mahul Noble Geo-Structs Project No. B1102 August 10, 2010
BH No. 10
Top 1m layer consists of filled up material.
Layer I
It consists of yellowish silty clay. It is observed from 0m to 6m below existing ground level.
SPT’s conducted at various depths showed N-value as 22 to refusal.
Layer II
It consists of highly weathered fractured basalt grey. It is observed from 6m to 7.5m below
existing ground level. The core recovery is 14% and RQD as nil. The Grade of the strata is IV as
per Appendix A-3, General Notes Table No.3.
Layer III
It consists of slightly weathered basalt grey. It is observed from 7.5m to 12m below existing
ground level. The core recovery is in the range of 42% to 59% and RQD varies from 21% to
49%. The Grade of the strata is II as per Appendix A-3, General Notes Table No.3.
Layer IV
It consists of fresh amygdaloidal basalt grey. It is observed from 12m to 15m below existing
ground level. The core recovery is in the range of 65% to 85% and RQD varies from 59% to
77%. The Grade of the strata is I as per Appendix A-3, General Notes Table No.3.
The ground water table is struck at 7.1m below existing ground level.
The borehole is terminated at 15m below existing ground level.
Geotechnical Investigation at BPCL, Mahul Noble Geo-Structs Project No. B1102 August 10, 2010
BH No. 11
Top 1m layer consists of filled up material.
Layer I
It consists of completely weathered basalt, grey. It is observed from 1m to 6m below existing
ground level. SPT’s conducted at various depths showed N-value as refusal. The Grade of the
strata is V as per Appendix A-3, General Notes Table No.3.
Layer II
It consists of fresh fractured basalt grey. It is observed from 6m to 12m below existing ground
level. The core recovery is in the range of 82% to 93% and RQD varies from 7% to 88%. The
Grade of the strata is I as per Appendix A-3, General Notes Table No.3.
The ground water table is struck at 4.5m below existing ground level.
The borehole is terminated at 12m below existing ground level.
Geotechnical Investigation at BPCL, Mahul Noble Geo-Structs Project No. B1102 August 10, 2010
BH No. 12
Top 0m layer consists of filled up material.
Layer I
It consists of silty clay brown. It is observed from 0m to 3.5m below existing ground level. SPT’s
conducted at 3.5m depth showed N-value as refusal.
Layer II
It consists of moderately weathered fractured basalt grey. It is observed from 3.5m to 8m below
existing ground level. The core recovery is in the range of 31% to 39% and RQD varies from 9%
to 27%. The Grade of the strata is III as per Appendix A-3, General Notes Table No.3.
Layer III
It consists of fresh fractured basalt grey. It is observed from 8m to 10m below existing ground
level. The core recovery is in the range of 67% to 90% and RQD varies from 40% to 65%. The
Grade of the strata is I as per Appendix A-3, General Notes Table No.3.
The ground water table is struck at 2.6m below existing ground level.
The borehole is terminated at 10m below existing ground level.
Geotechnical Investigation at BPCL, Mahul Noble Geo-Structs Project No. B1102 August 10, 2010
BH No. 13
Top 1.5m layer consists of filled up material. SPT’s conducted at 1.5m depth showed N-value as
refusal.
Layer I
It consists of highly weathered basalt grey. It is observed from 1.5m to 2.5m below existing
ground level. The core recovery is 25% and RQD as nil. The Grade of the strata is IV as per
Appendix A-3, General Notes Table No.3.
Layer II
It consists of slightly weathered basalt grey. It is observed from 2.5m to 4m below existing
ground level. The core recovery is 41% and RQD as nil. The Grade of the strata is II as per
Appendix A-3, General Notes Table No.3.
Layer III
It consists of fresh basalt grey. It is observed from 4m to 5.5m below existing ground level. The
core recovery is 86% and RQD as 45%. The Grade of the strata is I as per Appendix A-3,
General Notes Table No.3.
Layer IV
It consists of slightly weathered basalt grey. It is observed from 5.5m to 7.05m below existing
ground level. The core recovery is 54% and RQD as 50%. The Grade of the strata is II as per
Appendix A-3, General Notes Table No.3.
The ground water table is struck at 1.9m below existing ground level.
The borehole is terminated at 7.05m below existing ground level.
Geotechnical Investigation at BPCL, Mahul Noble Geo-Structs Project No. B1102 August 10, 2010
BH No. 14
Top 4.5m layer consists of filled up material. SPT’s conducted at various depths showed N-
value as refusal.
Layer I
It consists of highly weathered basalt grey. It is observed from 4.5m to 7m below existing
ground level. The core recovery is in the range of 12% to 13% and RQD as nil. The Grade of
the strata is IV as per Appendix A-3, General Notes Table No.3.
Layer II
It consists of completely weathered basalt grey. It is observed from 7m to 8.5m below existing
ground level. The core recovery is 7% and RQD as nil. The Grade of the strata is V as per
Appendix A-3, General Notes Table No.3.
Layer III
It consists of highly weathered basalt grey. It is observed from 8.5m to 10m below existing
ground level. The core recovery is 13% and RQD as nil. The Grade of the strata is IV as per
Appendix A-3, General Notes Table No.3.
Layer III
It consists of fresh basalt grey. It is observed from 10m to 12.1m below existing ground level.
The core recovery is 96% and RQD as 68%. The Grade of the strata is I as per Appendix A-3,
General Notes Table No.3.
The ground water table is struck at 5.2m below existing ground level.
The borehole is terminated at 12.10m below existing ground level.
Geotechnical Investigation at BPCL, Mahul Noble Geo-Structs Project No. B1102 August 10, 2010
BH No. 15
Top 0m layer consists of filled up material.
Layer I
It consists of silty clay brown. It is observed from 0m to 3.5m below existing ground level. SPT’s
conducted at 3.5m depth showed N-value as refusal.
Layer II
It consists of moderately weathered basalt brown. It is observed from 3.5m to 5m below existing
ground level. The core recovery is 29% and RQD as 13%. The Grade of the strata is III as per
Appendix A-3, General Notes Table No.3.
Layer III
It consists of fresh basalt grey. It is observed from 5m to 6.5m below existing ground level. The
core recovery is 61% and RQD as 41%. The Grade of the strata is I as per Appendix A-3,
General Notes Table No.3.
Layer IV
It consists of slightly weathered basalt grey brown. It is observed from 6.5m to 11.9m below
existing ground level. The core recovery is in the range of 39% to 57% and RQD varies from
14% to 53%. The Grade of the strata is II as per Appendix A-3, General Notes Table No.3.
The ground water table is struck at 3.4m below existing ground level.
The borehole is terminated at 11.9m below existing ground level.
Geotechnical Investigation at BPCL, Mahul Noble Geo-Structs Project No. B1102 August 10, 2010
BH No. 16
Layer I
It consists of murrum. It is observed from 0m to 2.5m below existing ground level. SPT’s
conducted at various depths showed N-value as refusal.
Layer II
It consists of highly weathered basalt grey. It is observed from 2.5m to 4m below existing
ground level. The core recovery is 15% and RQD as nil. The Grade of the strata is IV as per
Appendix A-3, General Notes Table No.3.
Layer III
It consists of slightly weathered basalt grey. It is observed from 4m to 5.5m below existing
ground level. The core recovery is 55% and RQD as 31%. The Grade of the strata is II as per
Appendix A-3, General Notes Table No.3.
Layer IV
It consists of fresh basalt grey. It is observed from 5.5m to 10m below existing ground level. The
core recovery is in the range of 82% to 89% and RQD varies from 73% to 79%. The Grade of
the strata is I as per Appendix A-3, General Notes Table No.3.
Layer V
It consists of fresh amygdaloidal basalt grey. It is observed from 10m to 12m below existing
ground level. The core recovery is in the range of 78% to 83% and RQD varies from 78% to
79%. The Grade of the strata is I as per Appendix A-3, General Notes Table No.3.
The ground water table is struck at 0.9m below existing ground level.
The borehole is terminated at 12m below existing ground level.
Geotechnical Investigation at BPCL, Mahul Noble Geo-Structs Project No. B1102 August 10, 2010
BH No. 17
Top 1m layer consists of filled up material.
Layer I
It consists of yellowish murrum. It is observed from 1m to 3.5m below existing ground level.
SPT’s conducted at 3.5m depth showed N-value as refusal.
Layer II
It consists of completely weathered basalt grey. It is observed from 3.5m to 5m below existing
ground level. The core recovery is nil and RQD as nil. The Grade of the strata is V as per
Appendix A-3, General Notes Table No.3.
Layer III
It consists of fresh amygdaloidal basalt grey. It is observed from 5m to 12.5m below existing
ground level. The core recovery is in the range of 74% to 95% and RQD varies from 55% to
89%. The Grade of the strata is I as per Appendix A-3, General Notes Table No.3.
The ground water table is struck at 2.5m below existing ground level.
The borehole is terminated at 12.5m below existing ground level.
Geotechnical Investigation at BPCL, Mahul Noble Geo-Structs Project No. B1102 August 10, 2010
BH No. 18
Top 1m layer consists of filled up material.
Layer I
It consists of yellowish murrum. It is observed from 1m to 4m below existing ground level. SPT’s
conducted at 3m depth showed N-value as refusal.
Layer II
It consists of moderately weathered basalt grey. It is observed from 4m to 7m below existing
ground level. The core recovery is in the range of 25% to 39% and RQD varies from nil to 21%.
The Grade of the strata is III as per Appendix A-3, General Notes Table No.3.
Layer III
It consists of fresh amygdaloidal basalt grey, red. It is observed from 7m to 11.5m below
existing ground level. The core recovery is in the range of 77% to 96% and RQD varies from
67% to 96%. The Grade of the strata is I as per Appendix A-3, General Notes Table No.3.
The ground water table is struck at 2.5m below existing ground level.
The borehole is terminated at 11.5m below existing ground level.
Geotechnical Investigation at BPCL, Mahul Noble Geo-Structs Project No. B1102 August 10, 2010
BH No. 19
Top 1m layer consists of filled up material.
Layer I
It consists of yellowish murrum. It is observed from 1m to 4.5m below existing ground level.
SPT’s conducted at various depths showed N-value as refusal.
Layer II
It consists of highly weathered basalt grey. It is observed from 4.5m to 6m below existing
ground level. The core recovery is 18% and RQD varies from nil to 21%. The Grade of the
strata is III as per Appendix A-3, General Notes Table No.3.
Layer III
It consists of fresh amygdaloidal fractured basalt grey. It is observed from 6m to 9m below
existing ground level. The core recovery is in the range of 72% to 83% and RQD varies from
59% to 75%. The Grade of the strata is I as per Appendix A-3, General Notes Table No.3.
The ground water table is struck at 1.3m below existing ground level.
The borehole is terminated at 9m below existing ground level.
Geotechnical Investigation at BPCL, Mahul Noble Geo-Structs Project No. B1102 August 10, 2010
BH No. 20
Top 1m layer consists of filled up material.
Layer I
It consists of yellowish soil with murrum. It is observed from 1m to 4.5m below existing ground
level. SPT’s conducted at 3m depth showed N-value as refusal.
Layer II
It consists of slightly weathered amygdaloidal fractured basalt grey. It is observed from 4.5m to
6m below existing ground level. The core recovery is 49% and RQD as 32%. The Grade of the
strata is II as per Appendix A-3, General Notes Table No.3.
Layer III
It consists of fresh amygdaloidal fractured basalt grey. It is observed from 6m to 11m below
existing ground level. The core recovery is in the range of 61% to 97% and RQD varies from
33% to 91%. The Grade of the strata is I as per Appendix A-3, General Notes Table No.3.
The ground water table is struck at 3.5m below existing ground level.
The borehole is terminated at 11m below existing ground level.
Geotechnical Investigation at BPCL, Mahul Noble Geo-Structs Project No. B1102 August 10, 2010
BH No. 21
Top 1m layer consists of filled up material.
Layer I
It consists of moderately weathered basalt grey. It is observed from 1m to 3m below existing
ground level. The core recovery is 39% and RQD as 34%. SPT’s conducted at 1.5m depth
showed N-value as refusal. The Grade of the strata is III as per Appendix A-3, General Notes
Table No.3.
Layer II
It consists of slightly weathered fractured basalt grey. It is observed from 3m to 4.5m below
existing ground level. The core recovery is 53% and RQD as 21%. The Grade of the strata is II
as per Appendix A-3, General Notes Table No.3.
Layer III
It consists of fresh fractured basalt grey. It is observed from 4.5m to 9m below existing ground
level. The core recovery is in the range of 84% to 98% and RQD varies from 75% to 94%. The
Grade of the strata is I as per Appendix A-3, General Notes Table No.3.
The ground water table is struck at 2.1m below existing ground level.
The borehole is terminated at 9m below existing ground level.
Geotechnical Investigation at BPCL, Mahul Noble Geo-Structs Project No. B1102 August 10, 2010
BH No. 22
Top 1m layer consists of filled up material (with soil and boulders).
Layer I
It consists of brownish murrum. It is observed from 1m to 1.5m below existing ground level.
SPT’s conducted at 1.5m depth showed N-value as refusal.
Layer II
It consists of completely weathered basalt grey. It is observed from 1.5m to 2.5m below existing
ground level. The core recovery is nil and RQD as nil. The Grade of the strata is V as per
Appendix A-3, General Notes Table No.3.
Layer III
It consists of highly weathered basalt grey. It is observed from 2.5m to 4m below existing
ground level. The core recovery is 23% and RQD as nil. The Grade of the strata is IV as per
Appendix A-3, General Notes Table No.3.
Layer IV
It consists of slightly weathered basalt grey. It is observed from 4m to 7m below existing ground
level. The core recovery is in the range of 40% to 57% and RQD varies from 9% to 14%. The
Grade of the strata is II as per Appendix A-3, General Notes Table No.3.
Layer V
It consists of fresh basalt grey, black. It is observed from 7m to 11.5m below existing ground
level. The core recovery is in the range of 94% to 99% and RQD varies from 51% to 94%. The
Grade of the strata is I as per Appendix A-3, General Notes Table No.3.
The ground water table is struck at 1.5m below existing ground level.
The borehole is terminated at 11.5m below existing ground level.
Geotechnical Investigation at BPCL, Mahul Noble Geo-Structs Project No. B1102 August 10, 2010
BH No. 23
Top 1m layer consists of filled up material.
Layer I
It consists of yellowish hard murrum. It is observed from 1m to 7.5m below existing ground level.
SPT’s conducted at various depths showed N-value as refusal.
Layer II
It consists of slightly weathered fractured basalt grey. It is observed from 7.5m to 12m below
existing ground level. The core recovery is in the range of 49% to 58% and RQD varies from nil
to 32%. The Grade of the strata is II as per Appendix A-3, General Notes Table No.3.
Layer III
It consists of fresh amygdaloidal basalt grey. It is observed from 12m to 18m below existing
ground level. The core recovery is in the range of 85% to 95% and RQD varies from 76% to
91%. The Grade of the strata is I as per Appendix A-3, General Notes Table No.3.
The ground water table is struck at 3m below existing ground level.
The borehole is terminated at 18m below existing ground level.
Geotechnical Investigation at BPCL, Mahul Noble Geo-Structs Project No. B1102 August 10, 2010
RECOMMENDATIONS AND ANALYSIS
Twenty three boreholes were drilled at stipulated locations. The grain size analysis shows
gravel content 3.87%, sand 23.77%, silt 29.57% and clay 42.79%. The Atterberg Limits shows
Liquid limit 56.61%, Plastic limit 28.12%, Shrinkage limit 14.11% and Plasticity index 28.50%.
The Specific gravity is 2.69. The Natural Moisture Content is 23.21%, dry density is 1.53 g/cc,
Wet density is 1.88 g/cc and Void ratio is 0.76.
Rock Properties
The average rock properties for different types of rock are given below :
Test Value
Density (g/cc) 2.72
Water absorption (%) 0.30
Specific gravity 2.75
Porosity (%) 1.16
UCS (kg/cm2) 715
Point Load index (kg/cm2) 34
Geotechnical Investigation at BPCL, Mahul Noble Geo-Structs Project No. B1102 August 10, 2010
Chemical Analysis of Soil
Test Value
pH 7.4
CI (%) 0.0839
SO3 (%) 0.0305
Chemical Analysis of Water
Test Value
pH 7.5
CI (ppm) 257
SO3 (ppm) 215
The aggressive chemicals are within the permissible limits (provided in Appendix A3, Table 4).
No extra precautions are required.
Geotechnical Investigation at BPCL, Mahul Noble Geo-Structs Project No. B1102 August 10, 2010
GEOLOGICAL SURVEY OF MUMBAI:
Mumbai, Gateway to Asia and the financial capital of the country, is the capital of Maharashtra.
It is the leading port on the west coast of India. Mumbai is built on group of island, lying off the
Konkan coast. On the western side of the city is the broad sweep of the harbour. In land, the city
is framed by the backdrop of the western ghat mountain chains.
Mumbai city has an area of about 69sq.kms. and falls within latitudes 18056’ to 19017’ N and
longitufes 72047’ to 72058’E, in Survey of India toposheet nos.47A and B,F. The city is
surrounded by Arabian sea to the west and Thane district to the east and north. The city is well
connected by terminals of western, central and harbors Railways. It is connected by road to
other parts of the country by National Highway No. 3 (Agra-Mumbai), No. 4 (Mumbai
Bangalore), No. 8 (Mumbai Amritsar) and No. 17 (Mumbai-Goa). The city has two international
airports and safe seaport and has air links to all major capitals of the world.
The city lies on low, flat land a quarter of which is below the sea level. On the either side are low
hills. The eastern hills end in the Nariman point. At the end of the western hills is Malabar hill
which, at only 55 metres above the sea level, is the city’s highest point. Land reclamation
schemes have brought development of the foreshore, but marshes particularly the Thane creek
still covers large area.
Geologically the entire land is occupied by Deccan Basaltic flows and the associated
pyroclastics and the plutonic rocks of upper cretaceous to palaeogene age. The Deccan basalt
of Mumbai Island is considered to be the youngest basalt of Eocene age. Overall the geology
around Mumbai indicates presence of ultrabasic, basic and acid differentiates with intertrappean
beds, agglomerates and tuffs. The ultrabasic differentiates are of limited occurrence. Acid rocks
include rhyolite and quartz trachyte. The agglomerate and tuff include reworked material as
indicated by current bedding and graded bedding. The basalt flows of the area have been
grouped into compound flows (i.e. pahoehoe type), simple flows and flows which do not fall in
the above categories and hence termed as unclassified flows. The basaltic flows are typically of
quartz and hypersthene normative with minor amount of olivine theolites. The lava pile of
Mumbai is inturn intruded by columnar jointed medium grained doleritic dykes.
Geotechnical Investigation at BPCL, Mahul Noble Geo-Structs Project No. B1102 August 10, 2010
The Deccan Trap basalt has been classified as Sahyadri Group which has been divided into
three formations viz. the lower most Upper Ratanghar Formation followed by Elephanta
formation and topmost Borivali Formation. The Upper Ratanghar Formation is restricted to two
patches, one from Kurla to Mulund and the other at SE of Kurla. This Formations consists of
simple ‘aa’ type of flows. The middle formation i.e. Elephanta Formation comprising of simple
and compound flows occur as small isolated patches in the SE corner of the city near Thane
creek and covers very negligible area. The rest of the area is covered by rock of Borivali
Formation where it is not occupied by alluvium. Normally, alluvium is restricted to the western
half of the area.
Laterite occure as small isolated patches in the area north and east of Mulund. Bauxite occurs
within the laterite in a irregular shape and is not of any economic importance.
Geotechnical Investigation at BPCL, Mahul Noble Geo-Structs Project No. B1102 August 10, 2010
STRUCTUREWISE SAFE BEARING CAPACITY.RECOMMENDATIONS
FOR ISBL AREA
Type Foundation:
As the competent strata is found at shallow depth, OPEN FOUNDATION is recommended for
the proposed site
Safe Bearing Capacity
Safe Bearing Capacity for the borehole at different depths with various widths is given in the
table below:
Sr.
No. STRUCTURE.
Depth
(m) Footing size SBC (t/m2)
Settlement,
(mm)
1 4 1.5 x 1.5 50 6
2 4 2 x 2 50 6
3 4 2.5 x 2.5 50 6
4 4 3 x 3 50 6
5 4 3.5 x 3.5 50 6
6 4 4 x 4 50 6
7 4 4.5 x 4.5 50 6
8 4 5 x 5 50 6
9 4 5.5 x 5.5 50 6
10
Piperack
Structure D
4 6 x 6 50 6
Sr.
No. STRUCTURE.
Depth
(m) Footing size SBC (t/m2)
Settlement,
(mm)
1 4 1.5 x 1.5 70 6
2 4 2 x 2 70 6
3 4 2.5 x 2.5 70 6
4 4 3 x 3 70 6
5 4 3.5 x 3.5 70 6
6 4 4 x 4 70 6
7 4 4.5 x 4.5 70 6
8 4 5 x 5 70 6
9 4 5.5 x 5.5 70 6
10
Piperack
Structure E
4 6 x 6 70 6
Geotechnical Investigation at BPCL, Mahul Noble Geo-Structs Project No. B1102 August 10, 2010
Sr.
No. STRUCTURE.
Depth
(m) Footing size SBC (t/m2)
Settlement,
(mm)
1 4 1.5 x 1.5 70 6
2 4 2 x 2 70 6
3 4 2.5 x 2.5 70 6
4 4 3 x 3 70 6
5 4 3.5 x 3.5 70 6
6 4 4 x 4 70 6
7 4 4.5 x 4.5 70 6
8 4 5 x 5 70 6
9 4 5.5 x 5.5 70 6
10
Piperack
Structure F
4 6 x 6 70 6
Sr.
No. STRUCTURE.
Depth
(m) Footing size SBC (t/m2)
Settlement,
(mm)
1 4 1.5 x 1.5 50 6
2 4 2 x 2 50 6
3 4 2.5 x 2.5 50 6
4 4 3 x 3 50 6
5 4 3.5 x 3.5 50 6
6 4 4 x 4 50 6
7 4 4.5 x 4.5 50 6
8 4 5 x 5 50 6
9 4 5.5 x 5.5 50 6
10
Technical
Structure A
4 6 x 6 50 6
Geotechnical Investigation at BPCL, Mahul Noble Geo-Structs Project No. B1102 August 10, 2010
Sr.
No. STRUCTURE.
Depth
(m) Footing size SBC (t/m2)
Settlement,
(mm)
1 4 1.5 x 1.5 100 6
2 4 2 x 2 100 6
3 4 2.5 x 2.5 100 6
4 4 3 x 3 100 6
5 4 3.5 x 3.5 100 6
6 4 4 x 4 100 6
7 4 4.5 x 4.5 100 6
8 4 5 x 5 100 6
9 4 5.5 x 5.5 100 6
10
PSA Package
4 6 x 6 100 6
Sr.
No. STRUCTURE.
Depth
(m) Footing size SBC (t/m2)
Settlement,
(mm)
1 5 1.5 x 1.5 30 6
2 5 2 x 2 30 6
3 5 2.5 x 2.5 30 6
4 5 3 x 3 30 6
5 5 3.5 x 3.5 30 6
6 5 4 x 4 30 6
7 5 4.5 x 4.5 30 6
8 5 5 x 5 30 6
9 5 5.5 x 5.5 30 6
10
Open
Foundations
Between
Compressor
H3 & Piperack
Structure D
5 6 x 6 30 6
Geotechnical Investigation at BPCL, Mahul Noble Geo-Structs Project No. B1102 August 10, 2010
RAFT FOUNDATION
SBC for Raft foundation is calculated at different locations at various depths and
is given below.
Sr.
No. STRUCTURE
Depth
(m)
Raft Size
(m2)
SBC
(t/m2)
Settlement
(mm)
Subgrade
Modulus
(Kg/cm3)
1 Piperack
Structure D 4 10x10 50 6 6
2 Piperack
Structure E 4 10x10 70 6 8
3 Piperack
Structure F 4 10x10 70 6 8
4 Technical
Structure A 4 10x10 50 6 6
5 PSA Package 4 10x10 100 6 12
Geotechnical Investigation at BPCL, Mahul Noble Geo-Structs Project No. B1102 August 10, 2010
STRUCTUREWISE SAFE BEARING CAPACITY.RECOMMENDATIONS
FOR OSBL AREA
Type Foundation:
As the competent strata is found at shallow depth, OPEN FOUNDATION is recommended for
the proposed site
Safe Bearing Capacity
Safe Bearing Capacity for the borehole at different depths with various widths is given in the
table below:
Sr.
No. STRUCTURE.
Depth
(m) Footing size SBC (t/m2)
Settlement,
(mm)
1 4 1.5 x 1.5 30 6
2 4 2 x 2 30 6
3 4 2.5 x 2.5 30 6
4 4 3 x 3 30 6
5 4 3.5 x 3.5 30 6
6 4 4 x 4 30 6
7 4 4.5 x 4.5 30 6
8 4 5 x 5 30 6
9 4 5.5 x 5.5 30 6
10
RMP Control
Room
4 6 x 6 30 6
Sr.
No. STRUCTURE.
Depth
(m) Footing size SBC (t/m2)
Settlement,
(mm)
1 4 1.5 x 1.5 40 6
2 4 2 x 2 40 6
3 4 2.5 x 2.5 40 6
4 4 3 x 3 40 6
5 4 3.5 x 3.5 40 6
6 4 4 x 4 40 6
7 4 4.5 x 4.5 40 6
8 4 5 x 5 40 6
9 4 5.5 x 5.5 40 6
10
Sub Station
4 6 x 6 40 6
Geotechnical Investigation at BPCL, Mahul Noble Geo-Structs Project No. B1102 August 10, 2010
SAFE BEARING CAPACITY OF ROCK
The Safe bearing capacity on rock strata given in the recommendations tables is based on IS
12070 (IS code for shallow foundation for rock) and engineering judgment.
TYPE OF CEMENT
Even though the aggressive chemicals are within the permissible limits as per IS 456 – 2000, it
is recommended to use OPC cement of 53 grade with suitable admixture in the concrete.
Geotechnical Investigation at BPCL, Mahul Noble Geo-Structs Project No. B1102 August 10, 2010
STRUCTURE A
Type Foundation:
As the competent strata is found at shallow depth, OPEN FOUNDATION is recommended for
the proposed site
Net Safe Bearing Capacity
Net Safe Bearing Capacity for the borehole at different depths with various widths is given in the
table below:
Sr.
No. BH No. Depth (m)
Width of the
footing (m)
Net SBC
(t/m2)
Settlement,
mm
1 1 1.5 14 4.39
2 1 2 13.7 5.34
3 1 2.5 13.56 6.32
4 1 3 13.44 7.28
5 1 3.5 13.37 8.24
6 1 4 13.33 9.19
7 1 4.5 13.3 10.14
8 1 5 13.28 11.00
9 1 5.5 13.27 12.02
10
12
1 6 13.27 12.96
Sr.
No. BH No. Depth (m)
Width of the
footing (m)
Net SBC
(t/m2)
Settlement,
mm
1 1.5 1.5 14.98 3.95
2 1.5 2 14.48 4.96
3 1.5 2.5 14.19 5.95
4 1.5 3 14.01 6.93
5 1.5 3.5 13.89 7.90
6 1.5 4 13.81 8.87
7 1.5 4.5 13.75 9.82
8 1.5 5 13.71 10.78
9 1.5 5.5 13.68 11.72
10
12
1.5 6 13.66 12.67
Geotechnical Investigation at BPCL, Mahul Noble Geo-Structs Project No. B1102 August 10, 2010
Sr.
No. BH No. Depth (m)
Width of the
footing (m)
Net SBC
(t/m2)
Settlement,
mm
1 2 1.5 15.9 4.04
2 2 2 15.23 5.04
3 2 2.5 15.83 6.02
4 2 3 14.58 6.99
5 2 3.5 14.41 7.96
6 2 4 14.29 8.92
7 2 4.5 14.20 9.87
8 2 5 14.13 10.81
9 2 5.5 14.09 11.77
10
12
2 6 14.05 12.70
Sr.
No. BH No. Depth (m)
Width of the
footing (m)
Net SBC
(t/m2)
Settlement,
mm
1 2.5 1.5 16.82 4.15
2 2.5 2 15.97 5.13
3 2.5 2.5 15.47 6.1
4 2.5 3 15.15 7.07
5 2.5 3.5 14.93 8.03
6 2.5 4 14.77 8.99
7 2.5 4.5 14.65 9.93
8 2.5 5 14.56 10.88
9 2.5 5.5 14.50 11.83
10
12
2.5 6 14.44 12.76
Geotechnical Investigation at BPCL, Mahul Noble Geo-Structs Project No. B1102 August 10, 2010
Sr.
No. BH No. Depth (m)
Width of the
footing (m)
Net SBC
(t/m2)
Settlement,
mm
1 3 1.5 17.74 4.28
2 3 2 16.71 5.24
3 3 2.5 16.11 6.21
4 3 3 15.72 7.16
5 3 3.5 15.44 8.11
6 3 4 15.25 9.07
7 3 4.5 15.10 10.01
8 3 5 14.99 10.96
9 3 5.5 14.98 11.89
10
12
3 6 14.84 12.83
Sr.
No. BH No. Depth (m)
Width of the
footing (m)
Net SBC
(t/m2)
Settlement,
mm
1 3.5 1.5 50 6
2 3.5 2 50 6
3 3.5 2.5 50 6
4 3.5 3 50 6
5 3.5 3.5 50 6
6 3.5 4 50 6
7 3.5 4.5 50 6
8 3.5 5 50 6
9 3.5 5.5 50 6
10
12
3.5 6 50 6
Geotechnical Investigation at BPCL, Mahul Noble Geo-Structs Project No. B1102 August 10, 2010
Sr.
No. BH No. Depth (m)
Width of the
footing (m)
Net SBC
(t/m2)
Settlement,
mm
1 4 1.5 50 6
2 4 2 50 6
3 4 2.5 50 6
4 4 3 50 6
5 4 3.5 50 6
6 4 4 50 6
7 4 4.5 50 6
8 4 5 50 6
9 4 5.5 50 6
10
12
4 6 50 6
RAFT FOUNDATION
Net SBC for Raft foundation is calculated at different locations at various depths
and is given below.
SL
NO BH NO
Depth
m
Width of the
Raft
m
Net SBC
t/m2
Settlement
mm
Subgrade
Modulus
(Kg/cm3)
1 12 1 10 13.36 20.43 1.6
2 12 1.5 10 13.68 20.17 1.64
3 12 2 10 14.01 20.23 1.68
4 12 2.5 10 14.33 20.29 1.72
5 12 3 10 14.65 20.35 1.76
6 12 3.5 10 50 6 6
7 12 4 10 50 6 6
NOTE :
Strata should be check during actual excavation of foundation pits.
Geotechnical Investigation at BPCL, Mahul Noble Geo-Structs Project No. B1102 August 10, 2010
FIRE HEATER 1
Type Foundation:
As the competent strata is found at shallow depth, OPEN FOUNDATION is recommended for
the proposed site
Net Safe Bearing Capacity
Net Safe Bearing Capacity for the borehole at different depths with various widths is given in the
table below:
Sr.
No. BH No. Depth (m)
Width of the
footing (m)
Net SBC
(t/m2)
Settlement,
mm
1 1 1.5 12.56 3.85
2 1 2 12.43 4.75
3 1 2.5 12.39 5.67
4 1 3 12.41 6.62
5 1 3.5 12.46 7.75
6 1 4 12.52 8.53
7 1 4.5 12.6 9.51
8 1 5 12.68 10.49
9 1 5.5 12.78 11.50
10
13
1 6 12.87 12.50
Sr.
No. BH No. Depth (m)
Width of the
footing (m)
Net SBC
(t/m2)
Settlement,
mm
1 1.5 1.5 13.91 3.61
2 1.5 2 13.63 4.61
3 1.5 2.5 13.51 5.61
4 1.5 3 13.47 6.61
5 1.5 3.5 13.48 7.62
6 1.5 4 13.51 8.64
7 1.5 4.5 13.57 9.61
8 1.5 5 13.63 10.7
9 1.5 5.5 13.71 11.75
10
13
1.5 6 13.79 12.81
Geotechnical Investigation at BPCL, Mahul Noble Geo-Structs Project No. B1102 August 10, 2010
Sr.
No. BH No. Depth (m)
Width of the
footing (m)
Net SBC
(t/m2)
Settlement,
mm
1 2 1.5 40 6
2 2 2 40 6
3 2 2.5 40 6
4 2 3 40 6
5 2 3.5 40 6
6 2 4 40 6
7 2 4.5 40 6
8 2 5 40 6
9 2 5.5 40 6
10
13
2 6 40 6
Sr.
No. BH No. Depth (m)
Width of the
footing (m)
Net SBC
(t/m2)
Settlement,
mm
1 2.5 1.5 40 6
2 2.5 2 40 6
3 2.5 2.5 40 6
4 2.5 3 40 6
5 2.5 3.5 40 6
6 2.5 4 40 6
7 2.5 4.5 40 6
8 2.5 5 40 6
9 2.5 5.5 40 6
10
13
2.5 6 40 6
Geotechnical Investigation at BPCL, Mahul Noble Geo-Structs Project No. B1102 August 10, 2010
Sr.
No. BH No. Depth (m)
Width of the
footing (m)
Net SBC
(t/m2)
Settlement,
mm
1 3 1.5 70 6
2 3 2 70 6
3 3 2.5 70 6
4 3 3 70 6
5 3 3.5 70 6
6 3 4 70 6
7 3 4.5 70 6
8 3 5 70 6
9 3 5.5 70 6
10
13
3 6 70 6
Sr.
No. BH No. Depth (m)
Width of the
footing (m)
Net SBC
(t/m2)
Settlement,
mm
1 3.5 1.5 70 6
2 3.5 2 70 6
3 3.5 2.5 70 6
4 3.5 3 70 6
5 3.5 3.5 70 6
6 3.5 4 70 6
7 3.5 4.5 70 6
8 3.5 5 70 6
9 3.5 5.5 70 6
10
13
3.5 6 70 6
Geotechnical Investigation at BPCL, Mahul Noble Geo-Structs Project No. B1102 August 10, 2010
Sr.
No. BH No. Depth (m)
Width of the
footing (m)
Net SBC
(t/m2)
Settlement,
mm
1 4 1.5 70 6
2 4 2 70 6
3 4 2.5 70 6
4 4 3 70 6
5 4 3.5 70 6
6 4 4 70 6
7 4 4.5 70 6
8 4 5 70 6
9 4 5.5 70 6
10
13
4 6 70 6
RAFT FOUNDATION
Net SBC for Raft foundation is calculated at different locations at various depths
and is given below.
SL
NO BH NO
Depth
m
Width of the
Raft
m
Net SBC
t/m2
Settlement
mm
Subgrade
Modulus
(Kg/cm3)
1 13 1 10 13.73 21.09 1.65
2 13 1.5 10 14.59 21.75 1.75
3 13 2 10 40 6 4.8
4 13 2.5 10 40 6 4.8
5 13 3 10 70 6 8.4
6 13 3.5 10 70 6 8.4
7 13 4 10 70 6 8.4
NOTE :
Strata should be check during actual excavation of foundation pits.
Geotechnical Investigation at BPCL, Mahul Noble Geo-Structs Project No. B1102 August 10, 2010
OPEN FOUNDATION BETWEEN PIPE RACK STRUCTURE D AND COMPRESSOR HOUSE 3
Type Foundation:
As the competent strata is found at shallow depth, OPEN FOUNDATION is recommended for
the proposed site
Net Safe Bearing Capacity
Net Safe Bearing Capacity for the borehole at different depths with various widths is given in the
table below:
Sr.
No. BH No. Depth (m)
Width of the
footing (m)
Net SBC
(t/m2)
Settlement,
mm
1 1 1.5 13.91 4.36
2 1 2 13.61 5.30
3 1 2.5 13.44 6.26
4 1 3 13.34 7.21
5 1 3.5 13.28 8.17
6 1 4 13.24 9.12
7 1 4.5 13.22 10.07
8 1 5 13.21 11.01
9 1 5.5 13.20 11.95
10
14
1 6 13.21 12.89
Sr.
No. BH No. Depth (m)
Width of the
footing (m)
Net SBC
(t/m2)
Settlement,
mm
1 1.5 1.5 14.85 3.91
2 1.5 2 14.37 4.91
3 1.5 2.5 14.10 5.9
4 1.5 3 13.93 6.88
5 1.5 3.5 13.82 7.88
6 1.5 4 13.75 8.82
7 1.5 4.5 13.70 9.78
8 1.5 5 13.67 10.74
9 1.5 5.5 13.65 11.68
10
14
1.5 6 13.63 12.63
Geotechnical Investigation at BPCL, Mahul Noble Geo-Structs Project No. B1102 August 10, 2010
Sr.
No. BH No. Depth (m)
Width of the
footing (m)
Net SBC
(t/m2)
Settlement,
mm
1 2 1.5 15.78 4
2 2 2 15.14 5
3 2 2.5 14.77 5.99
4 2 3 14.53 6.96
5 2 3.5 14.37 7.93
6 2 4 14.26 8.89
7 2 4.5 14.18 9.85
8 2 5 14.12 10.8
9 2 5.5 14.09 11.77
10
14
2 6 14.06 12.72
Sr.
No. BH No. Depth (m)
Width of the
footing (m)
Net SBC
(t/m2)
Settlement,
mm
1 2.5 1.5 16.72 4.12
2 2.5 2 15.9 5.10
3 2.5 2.5 15.43 6.08
4 2.5 3 15.12 7.05
5 2.5 3.5 14.92 8.02
6 2.5 4 14.77 8.98
7 2.5 4.5 14.66 9.94
8 2.5 5 14.58 10.90
9 2.5 5.5 14.52 11.86
10
14
2.5 6 14.48 12.8
Geotechnical Investigation at BPCL, Mahul Noble Geo-Structs Project No. B1102 August 10, 2010
Sr.
No. BH No. Depth (m)
Width of the
footing (m)
Net SBC
(t/m2)
Settlement,
mm
1 3 1.5 17.65 4.25
2 3 2 16.67 5.23
3 3 2.5 16.09 6.20
4 3 3 15.72 7.16
5 3 3.5 15.46 8.13
6 3 4 15.28 9.09
7 3 4.5 15.14 10.04
8 3 5 15.04 11.00
9 3 5.5 14.97 11.96
10
14
3 6 14.91 12.98
Sr.
No. BH No. Depth (m)
Width of the
footing (m)
Net SBC
(t/m2)
Settlement,
mm
1 3.5 1.5 18.59 4.39
2 3.5 2 17.43 5.35
3 3.5 2.5 16.75 6.32
4 3.5 3 16.31 7.28
5 3.5 3.5 16.01 8.22
6 3.5 4 15.79 9.20
7 3.5 4.5 15.63 10.16
8 3.5 5 15.50 11.12
9 3.5 5.5 15.41 12.08
10
14
3.5 6 15.33 13.02
Geotechnical Investigation at BPCL, Mahul Noble Geo-Structs Project No. B1102 August 10, 2010
Sr.
No. BH No. Depth (m)
Width of the
footing (m)
Net SBC
(t/m2)
Settlement,
mm
1 4 1.5 19.52 4.53
2 4 2 18.20 5.49
3 4 2.5 17.42 6.45
4 4 3 16.91 7.41
5 4 3.5 16.56 8.37
6 4 4 16.3 9.33
7 4 4.5 16.11 10.28
8 4 5 15.96 11.24
9 4 5.5 15.85 12.20
10
14
4 6 15.76 13.15
Sr.
No. BH No. Depth (m)
Width of the
footing (m)
Net SBC
(t/m2)
Settlement,
mm
1 5 1.5 30 6
2 5 2 30 6
3 5 2.5 30 6
4 5 3 30 6
5 5 3.5 30 6
6 5 4 30 6
7 5 4.5 30 6
8 5 5 30 6
9 5 5.5 30 6
10
14
5 6 30 6
Geotechnical Investigation at BPCL, Mahul Noble Geo-Structs Project No. B1102 August 10, 2010
RAFT FOUNDATION
Net SBC for Raft foundation is calculated at different locations at various depths
and is given below.
SL
NO BH NO
Depth
m
Width of the
Raft
m
Net SBC
t/m2
Settlement
mm
Subgrade
Modulus
(Kg/cm3)
1 14 1 10 13.35 20.41 1.60
2 14 1.5 10 13.71 20.22 1.65
3 14 2 10 14.07 20.33 1.69
4 14 2.5 10 14.42 20.44 1.73
5 14 3 10 14.78 20.57 1.77
6 14 3.5 10 15.14 20.71 1.82
7 14 4 10 15.49 20.84 1.86
NOTE :
Strata should be check during actual excavation of foundation pits.
Geotechnical Investigation at BPCL, Mahul Noble Geo-Structs Project No. B1102 August 10, 2010
CBD PIT
Type Foundation:
As the competent strata is found at shallow depth, OPEN FOUNDATION is recommended for
the proposed site
Net Safe Bearing Capacity
Net Safe Bearing Capacity for the borehole at different depths with various widths is given in the
table below:
Sr.
No. BH No. Depth (m)
Width of the
footing (m)
Net SBC
(t/m2)
Settlement,
mm
1 1 1.5 13.58 4.23
2 1 2 13.31 5.16
3 1 2.5 13.16 6.16
4 1 3 13.08 7.05
5 1 3.5 13.04 7.99
6 1 4 13.02 8.94
7 1 4.5 13.01 9.88
8 1 5 13.02 10.83
9 1 5.5 13.03 11.77
10
15
1 6 13.05 12.71
Sr.
No. BH No. Depth (m)
Width of the
footing (m)
Net SBC
(t/m2)
Settlement,
mm
1 1.5 1.5 14.61 3.83
2 1.5 2 14.17 4.83
3 1.5 2.5 13.92 5.81
4 1.5 3 13.77 6.79
5 1.5 3.5 13.68 7.76
6 1.5 4 13.62 8.72
7 1.5 4.5 13.59 9.69
8 1.5 5 13.57 10.65
9 1.5 5.5 13.58 11.62
10
15
1.5 6 13.60 12.60
Geotechnical Investigation at BPCL, Mahul Noble Geo-Structs Project No. B1102 August 10, 2010
Sr.
No. BH No. Depth (m)
Width of the
footing (m)
Net SBC
(t/m2)
Settlement,
mm
1 2 1.5 15.66 3.97
2 2 2 15.04 4.97
3 2 2.5 14.69 5.95
4 2 3 14.47 6.92
5 2 3.5 14.33 7.90
6 2 4 14.25 8.80
7 2 4.5 14.19 9.85
8 2 5 14.14 10.82
9 2 5.5 14.11 11.79
10
15
2 6 14.10 12.76
Sr.
No. BH No. Depth (m)
Width of the
footing (m)
Net SBC
(t/m2)
Settlement,
mm
1 2.5 1.5 16.73 4.13
2 2.5 2 15.93 5.12
3 2.5 2.5 15.47 6.10
4 2.5 3 15.18 7.44
5 2.5 3.5 14.99 8.07
6 2.5 4 14.86 9.05
7 2.5 4.5 14.07 10.03
8 2.5 5 14.70 11
9 2.5 5.5 14.66 11.99
10
15
2.5 6 14.63 12.96
Geotechnical Investigation at BPCL, Mahul Noble Geo-Structs Project No. B1102 August 10, 2010
Sr.
No. BH No. Depth (m)
Width of the
footing (m)
Net SBC
(t/m2)
Settlement,
mm
1 3 1.5 17.82 4.3
2 3 2 16.84 5.29
3 3 2.5 16.27 6.28
4 3 3 15.90 7.27
5 3 3.5 15.66 8.26
6 3 4 15.49 9.24
7 3 4.5 15.37 10.23
8 3 5 15.28 11.22
9 3 5.5 15.21 12.22
10
15
3 6 15.17 13.19
Sr.
No. BH No. Depth (m)
Width of the
footing (m)
Net SBC
(t/m2)
Settlement,
mm
1 3.5 1.5 50 6
2 3.5 2 50 6
3 3.5 2.5 50 6
4 3.5 3 50 6
5 3.5 3.5 50 6
6 3.5 4 50 6
7 3.5 4.5 50 6
8 3.5 5 50 6
9 3.5 5.5 50 6
10
15
3.5 6 50 6
Geotechnical Investigation at BPCL, Mahul Noble Geo-Structs Project No. B1102 August 10, 2010
Sr.
No. BH No. Depth (m)
Width of the
footing (m)
Net SBC
(t/m2)
Settlement,
mm
1 4 1.5 50 6
2 4 2 50 6
3 4 2.5 50 6
4 4 3 50 6
5 4 3.5 50 6
6 4 4 50 6
7 4 4.5 50 6
8 4 5 50 6
9 4 5.5 50 6
10
15
4 6 50 6
Sr.
No. BH No. Depth (m)
Width of the
footing (m)
Net SBC
(t/m2)
Settlement,
mm
1 7 1.5 70 6
2 7 2 70 6
3 7 2.5 70 6
4 7 3 70 6
5 7 3.5 70 6
6 7 4 70 6
7 7 4.5 70 6
8 7 5 70 6
9 7 5.5 70 6
10
15
7 6 70 6
Refer above table Net SBC for a depth 4.50 to 6.50m level (70t/m2).
Geotechnical Investigation at BPCL, Mahul Noble Geo-Structs Project No. B1102 August 10, 2010
RAFT FOUNDATION
Net SBC for Raft foundation is calculated at different locations at various depths
and is given below
SL
NO BH NO
Depth
m
Width of the
Raft
m
Net SBC
t/m2
Settlement
mm
Subgrade
Modulus
(Kg/cm3)
1 15 1 10 13.31 20.34 1.59
2 15 1.5 10 13.77 20.33 1.65
3 15 2 10 14.23 20.61 1.71
4 15 2.5 10 14.69 20.90 1.76
5 15 3 10 15.15 21.19 1.82
6 15 3.5 10 50 6 6
7 15 4 10 50 6 6
NOTE :
Strata should be check during actual excavation of foundation pits.
Geotechnical Investigation at BPCL, Mahul Noble Geo-Structs Project No. B1102 August 10, 2010
PSA PACKAGE AND BATTERY LIMIT PIPE RACK
Type Foundation:
As the competent strata is found at shallow depth, OPEN FOUNDATION is recommended for
the proposed site
Net Safe Bearing Capacity
Net Safe Bearing Capacity for the borehole at different depths with various widths is given in the
table below:
Sr.
No. BH No. Depth (m)
Width of the
footing (m)
Net SBC
(t/m2)
Settlement,
mm
1 1 1.5 12.10 3.63
2 1 2 12.0 4.5
3 1 2.5 12.0 5.39
4 1 3 12.06 6.32
5 1 3.5 12.15 7.27
6 1 4 12.24 8.22
7 1 4.5 12.35 9.19
8 1 5 12.46 10.17
9 1 5.5 12.58 11.17
10
8
1 6 12.71 12.20
Sr.
No. BH No. Depth (m)
Width of the
footing (m)
Net SBC
(t/m2)
Settlement,
mm
1 1.5 1.5 13.57 3.45
2 1.5 2 13.34 4.43
3 1.5 2.5 13.37 5.47
4 1.5 3 13.27 6.42
5 1.5 3.5 13.31 7.42
6 1.5 4 13.37 8.43
7 1.5 4.5 13.46 9.47
8 1.5 5 13.55 10.51
9 1.5 5.5 13.66 11.58
10
8
1.5 6 13.77 12.65
Geotechnical Investigation at BPCL, Mahul Noble Geo-Structs Project No. B1102 August 10, 2010
Sr.
No. BH No. Depth (m)
Width of the
footing (m)
Net SBC
(t/m2)
Settlement,
mm
1 2 1.5 100 6
2 2 2 100 6
3 2 2.5 100 6
4 2 3 100 6
5 2 3.5 100 6
6 2 4 100 6
7 2 4.5 100 6
8 2 5 100 6
9 2 5.5 100 6
10
8
2 6 100 6
Sr.
No. BH No. Depth (m)
Width of the
footing (m)
Net SBC
(t/m2)
Settlement,
mm
1 2.5 1.5 100 6
2 2.5 2 100 6
3 2.5 2.5 100 6
4 2.5 3 100 6
5 2.5 3.5 100 6
6 2.5 4 100 6
7 2.5 4.5 100 6
8 2.5 5 100 6
9 2.5 5.5 100 6
10
8
2.5 6 100 6
Geotechnical Investigation at BPCL, Mahul Noble Geo-Structs Project No. B1102 August 10, 2010
Sr.
No. BH No. Depth (m)
Width of the
footing (m)
Net SBC
(t/m2)
Settlement,
mm
1 3 1.5 100 6
2 3 2 100 6
3 3 2.5 100 6
4 3 3 100 6
5 3 3.5 100 6
6 3 4 100 6
7 3 4.5 100 6
8 3 5 100 6
9 3 5.5 100 6
10
8
3 6 100 6
Sr.
No. BH No. Depth (m)
Width of the
footing (m)
Net SBC
(t/m2)
Settlement,
mm
1 3.5 1.5 100 6
2 3.5 2 100 6
3 3.5 2.5 100 6
4 3.5 3 100 6
5 3.5 3.5 100 6
6 3.5 4 100 6
7 3.5 4.5 100 6
8 3.5 5 100 6
9 3.5 5.5 100 6
10
8
3.5 6 100 6
Geotechnical Investigation at BPCL, Mahul Noble Geo-Structs Project No. B1102 August 10, 2010
Sr.
No. BH No. Depth (m)
Width of the
footing (m)
Net SBC
(t/m2)
Settlement,
mm
1 4 1.5 100 6
2 4 2 100 6
3 4 2.5 100 6
4 4 3 100 6
5 4 3.5 100 6
6 4 4 100 6
7 4 4.5 100 6
8 4 5 100 6
9 4 5.5 100 6
10
8
4 6 100 6
NOTE :
Strata should be check during actual excavation of foundation pits.
Geotechnical Investigation at BPCL, Mahul Noble Geo-Structs Project No. B1102 August 10, 2010
FIRE HEATER 2
Type Foundation:
As the competent strata is found at shallow depth, OPEN FOUNDATION is recommended for
the proposed site
Net Safe Bearing Capacity
Net Safe Bearing Capacity for the borehole at different depths with various widths is given in the
table below:
Sr.
No. BH No. Depth (m)
Width of the
footing (m)
Net SBC
(t/m2)
Settlement,
mm
1 1 1.5 100 6
2 1 2 100 6
3 1 2.5 100 6
4 1 3 100 6
5 1 3.5 100 6
6 1 4 100 6
7 1 4.5 100 6
8 1 5 100 6
9 1 5.5 100 6
10
7
1 6 100 6
Sr.
No. BH No. Depth (m)
Width of the
footing (m)
Net SBC
(t/m2)
Settlement,
mm
1 1.5 1.5 100 6
2 1.5 2 100 6
3 1.5 2.5 100 6
4 1.5 3 100 6
5 1.5 3.5 100 6
6 1.5 4 100 6
7 1.5 4.5 100 6
8 1.5 5 100 6
9 1.5 5.5 100 6
10
7
1.5 6 100 6
Geotechnical Investigation at BPCL, Mahul Noble Geo-Structs Project No. B1102 August 10, 2010
Sr.
No. BH No. Depth (m)
Width of the
footing (m)
Net SBC
(t/m2)
Settlement,
mm
1 2 1.5 100 6
2 2 2 100 6
3 2 2.5 100 6
4 2 3 100 6
5 2 3.5 100 6
6 2 4 100 6
7 2 4.5 100 6
8 2 5 100 6
9 2 5.5 100 6
10
7
2 6 100 6
Sr.
No. BH No. Depth (m)
Width of the
footing (m)
Net SBC
(t/m2)
Settlement,
mm
1 2.5 1.5 100 6
2 2.5 2 100 6
3 2.5 2.5 100 6
4 2.5 3 100 6
5 2.5 3.5 100 6
6 2.5 4 100 6
7 2.5 4.5 100 6
8 2.5 5 100 6
9 2.5 5.5 100 6
10
7
2.5 6 100 6
Geotechnical Investigation at BPCL, Mahul Noble Geo-Structs Project No. B1102 August 10, 2010
Sr.
No. BH No. Depth (m)
Width of the
footing (m)
Net SBC
(t/m2)
Settlement,
mm
1 3 1.5 100 6
2 3 2 100 6
3 3 2.5 100 6
4 3 3 100 6
5 3 3.5 100 6
6 3 4 100 6
7 3 4.5 100 6
8 3 5 100 6
9 3 5.5 100 6
10
7
3 6 100 6
Sr.
No. BH No. Depth (m)
Width of the
footing (m)
Net SBC
(t/m2)
Settlement,
mm
1 3.5 1.5 100 6
2 3.5 2 100 6
3 3.5 2.5 100 6
4 3.5 3 100 6
5 3.5 3.5 100 6
6 3.5 4 100 6
7 3.5 4.5 100 6
8 3.5 5 100 6
9 3.5 5.5 100 6
10
7
3.5 6 100 6
Geotechnical Investigation at BPCL, Mahul Noble Geo-Structs Project No. B1102 August 10, 2010
Sr.
No. BH No. Depth (m)
Width of the
footing (m)
Net SBC
(t/m2)
Settlement,
mm
1 4 1.5 100 6
2 4 2 100 6
3 4 2.5 100 6
4 4 3 100 6
5 4 3.5 100 6
6 4 4 100 6
7 4 4.5 100 6
8 4 5 100 6
9 4 5.5 100 6
10
7
4 6 100 6
NOTE :
Strata should be check during actual excavation of foundation pits.
Geotechnical Investigation at BPCL, Mahul Noble Geo-Structs Project No. B1102 August 10, 2010
PIPE RACK STRUCTURE E, F AND G
Type Foundation:
As the competent strata is found at shallow depth, OPEN FOUNDATION is recommended for
the proposed site
Net Safe Bearing Capacity
Net Safe Bearing Capacity for the borehole at different depths with various widths is given in the
table below:
Sr.
No. BH No. Depth (m) Footing size SBC (t/m2)
Settlement,
mm
1 1 1.5 x 1.5 70 6
2 1 2 x 2 70 6
3 1 2.5 x 2.5 70 6
4 1 3 x 3 70 6
5 1 3.5 x 3.5 70 6
6 1 4 x 4 70 6
7 1 4.5 x 4.5 70 6
8 1 5 x 5 70 6
9 1 5.5 x 5.5 70 6
10
9
1 6 x 6 70 6
Sr.
No. BH No. Depth (m) Footing size SBC (t/m2)
Settlement,
mm
1 1.5 1.5 x 1.5 70 6
2 1.5 2 x 2 70 6
3 1.5 2.5 x 2.5 70 6
4 1.5 3 x 3 70 6
5 1.5 3.5 x 3.5 70 6
6 1.5 4 x 4 70 6
7 1.5 4.5 x 4.5 70 6
8 1.5 5 x 5 70 6
9 1.5 5.5 x 5.5 70 6
10
9
1.5 6 x 6 70 6
Geotechnical Investigation at BPCL, Mahul Noble Geo-Structs Project No. B1102 August 10, 2010
Sr.
No. BH No. Depth (m)
Width of the
footing (m)
Net SBC
(t/m2)
Settlement,
mm
1 2 1.5 70 6
2 2 2 70 6
3 2 2.5 70 6
4 2 3 70 6
5 2 3.5 70 6
6 2 4 70 6
7 2 4.5 70 6
8 2 5 70 6
9 2 5.5 70 6
10
9
2 6 70 6
Sr.
No. BH No. Depth (m)
Width of the
footing (m)
Net SBC
(t/m2)
Settlement,
mm
1 2.5 1.5 100 6
2 2.5 2 100 6
3 2.5 2.5 100 6
4 2.5 3 100 6
5 2.5 3.5 100 6
6 2.5 4 100 6
7 2.5 4.5 100 6
8 2.5 5 100 6
9 2.5 5.5 100 6
10
9
2.5 6 100 6
Geotechnical Investigation at BPCL, Mahul Noble Geo-Structs Project No. B1102 August 10, 2010
Sr.
No. BH No. Depth (m)
Width of the
footing (m)
Net SBC
(t/m2)
Settlement,
mm
1 3 1.5 100 6
2 3 2 100 6
3 3 2.5 100 6
4 3 3 100 6
5 3 3.5 100 6
6 3 4 100 6
7 3 4.5 100 6
8 3 5 100 6
9 3 5.5 100 6
10
9
3 6 100 6
Sr.
No. BH No. Depth (m)
Width of the
footing (m)
Net SBC
(t/m2)
Settlement,
mm
1 3.5 1.5 100 6
2 3.5 2 100 6
3 3.5 2.5 100 6
4 3.5 3 100 6
5 3.5 3.5 100 6
6 3.5 4 100 6
7 3.5 4.5 100 6
8 3.5 5 100 6
9 3.5 5.5 100 6
10
9
3.5 6 100 6
Geotechnical Investigation at BPCL, Mahul Noble Geo-Structs Project No. B1102 August 10, 2010
Sr.
No. BH No. Depth (m)
Width of the
footing (m)
Net SBC
(t/m2)
Settlement,
mm
1 4 1.5 100 6
2 4 2 100 6
3 4 2.5 100 6
4 4 3 100 6
5 4 3.5 100 6
6 4 4 100 6
7 4 4.5 100 6
8 4 5 100 6
9 4 5.5 100 6
10
9
4 6 100 6
NOTE :
Strata should be check during actual excavation of foundation pits.
Geotechnical Investigation at BPCL, Mahul Noble Geo-Structs Project No. B1102 August 10, 2010
STRUCTURE B
Type Foundation:
As the competent strata is found at shallow depth, OPEN FOUNDATION is recommended for
the proposed site
Net Safe Bearing Capacity
Net Safe Bearing Capacity for the borehole at different depths with various widths is given in the
table below:
Sr.
No. BH No. Depth (m)
Width of the
footing (m)
Net SBC
(t/m2)
Settlement,
mm
1 1 1.5 24 8
2 1 2 25 11
3 1 2.5 25.5 13.5
4 1 3 26 16
5 1 3.5 26.7 19
6 1 4 27 21
7 1 4.5 28 24
8 1 5 26.5 25
9 1 5.5 25 25
10
6
1 6 23.5 25
Sr.
No. BH No. Depth (m)
Width of the
footing (m)
Net SBC
(t/m2)
Settlement,
mm
1 1.5 1.5 29 8
2 1.5 2 29 11
3 1.5 2.5 29.5 14
4 1.5 3 30 17
5 1.5 3.5 30.5 20
6 1.5 4 31 23
7 1.5 4.5 30 25
8 1.5 5 28 25
9 1.5 5.5 26 25
10
6
1.5 6 24.5 25
Geotechnical Investigation at BPCL, Mahul Noble Geo-Structs Project No. B1102 August 10, 2010
Sr.
No. BH No. Depth (m)
Width of the
footing (m)
Net SBC
(t/m2)
Settlement,
mm
1 2 1.5 70 6
2 2 2 70 6
3 2 2.5 70 6
4 2 3 70 6
5 2 3.5 70 6
6 2 4 70 6
7 2 4.5 70 6
8 2 5 70 6
9 2 5.5 70 6
10
6
2 6 70 6
Sr.
No. BH No. Depth (m)
Width of the
footing (m)
Net SBC
(t/m2)
Settlement,
mm
1 2.5 1.5 70 6
2 2.5 2 70 6
3 2.5 2.5 70 6
4 2.5 3 70 6
5 2.5 3.5 70 6
6 2.5 4 70 6
7 2.5 4.5 70 6
8 2.5 5 70 6
9 2.5 5.5 70 6
10
6
2.5 6 70 6
Geotechnical Investigation at BPCL, Mahul Noble Geo-Structs Project No. B1102 August 10, 2010
Sr.
No. BH No. Depth (m)
Width of the
footing (m)
Net SBC
(t/m2)
Settlement,
mm
1 3 1.5 70 6
2 3 2 70 6
3 3 2.5 70 6
4 3 3 70 6
5 3 3.5 70 6
6 3 4 70 6
7 3 4.5 70 6
8 3 5 70 6
9 3 5.5 70 6
10
6
3 6 70 6
Sr.
No. BH No. Depth (m)
Width of the
footing (m)
Net SBC
(t/m2)
Settlement,
mm
1 3.5 1.5 100 6
2 3.5 2 100 6
3 3.5 2.5 100 6
4 3.5 3 100 6
5 3.5 3.5 100 6
6 3.5 4 100 6
7 3.5 4.5 100 6
8 3.5 5 100 6
9 3.5 5.5 100 6
10
6
3.5 6 100 6
Geotechnical Investigation at BPCL, Mahul Noble Geo-Structs Project No. B1102 August 10, 2010
Sr.
No. BH No. Depth (m)
Width of the
footing (m)
Net SBC
(t/m2)
Settlement,
mm
1 4 1.5 100 6
2 4 2 100 6
3 4 2.5 100 6
4 4 3 100 6
5 4 3.5 100 6
6 4 4 100 6
7 4 4.5 100 6
8 4 5 100 6
9 4 5.5 100 6
10
6
4 6 100 6
RAFT FOUNDATION
Net SBC for Raft foundation is calculated at different locations at various depths
and is given below
SL
NO BH NO
Depth
m
Width of the
Raft
m
Net SBC
t/m2
Settlement
mm
Subgrade
Modulus
(Kg/cm3)
1 6 3 10 70 6 8.4
2 6 3 15 70 6 8.4
NOTE :
Strata should be check during actual excavation of foundation pits.
Geotechnical Investigation at BPCL, Mahul Noble Geo-Structs Project No. B1102 August 10, 2010
STRUCTURE C
Type Foundation:
As the competent strata is found at shallow depth, OPEN FOUNDATION is recommended for
the proposed site
Safe Bearing Capacity
Safe Bearing Capacity for the borehole at different depths with various widths is given in the
table below:
Sr.
No. BH No. Depth (m)
Width of the
footing (m)
Net SBC
(t/m2)
Settlement,
mm
1 1 1.5 14.16 4.45
2 1 2 13.83 5.40
3 1 2.5 13.63 6.36
4 1 3 13.51 7.33
5 1 3.5 13.43 8.28
6 1 4 13.38 9.23
7 1 4.5 13.34 10.18
8 1 5 13.32 11.12
9 1 5.5 13.30 12.05
10
02
1 6 13.29 12.98
Sr.
No. BH No. Depth (m)
Width of the
footing (m)
Net SBC
(t/m2)
Settlement,
mm
1 1.5 1.5 15.07 3.98
2 1.5 2 14.55 4.99
3 1.5 2.5 14.25 5.98
4 1.5 3 14.05 6.96
5 1.5 3.5 13.92 7.92
6 1.5 4 13.83 8.88
7 1.5 4.5 13.76 9.83
8 1.5 5 13.71 10.78
9 1.5 5.5 13.68 11.75
10
02
1.5 6 13.65 12.65
Geotechnical Investigation at BPCL, Mahul Noble Geo-Structs Project No. B1102 August 10, 2010
Sr.
No. BH No. Depth (m)
Width of the
footing (m)
Net SBC
(t/m2)
Settlement,
mm
1 2 1.5 30 6
2 2 2 30 6
3 2 2.5 30 6
4 2 3 30 6
5 2 3.5 30 6
6 2 4 30 6
7 2 4.5 30 6
8 2 5 30 6
9 2 5.5 30 6
10
02
2 6 30 6
Sr.
No. BH No. Depth (m)
Width of the
footing (m)
Net SBC
(t/m2)
Settlement,
mm
1 2.5 1.5 30 6
2 2.5 2 30 6
3 2.5 2.5 30 6
4 2.5 3 30 6
5 2.5 3.5 30 6
6 2.5 4 30 6
7 2.5 4.5 30 6
8 2.5 5 30 6
9 2.5 5.5 30 6
10
02
2.5 6 30 6
Geotechnical Investigation at BPCL, Mahul Noble Geo-Structs Project No. B1102 August 10, 2010
Sr.
No. BH No. Depth (m)
Width of the
footing (m)
Net SBC
(t/m2)
Settlement,
mm
1 3 1.5 30 6
2 3 2 30 6
3 3 2.5 30 6
4 3 3 30 6
5 3 3.5 30 6
6 3 4 30 6
7 3 4.5 30 6
8 3 5 30 6
9 3 5.5 30 6
10
02
3 6 30 6
Sr.
No. BH No. Depth (m)
Width of the
footing (m)
Net SBC
(t/m2)
Settlement,
mm
1 3.5 1.5 30 6
2 3.5 2 30 6
3 3.5 2.5 30 6
4 3.5 3 30 6
5 3.5 3.5 30 6
6 3.5 4 30 6
7 3.5 4.5 30 6
8 3.5 5 30 6
9 3.5 5.5 30 6
10
02
3.5 6 30 6
Geotechnical Investigation at BPCL, Mahul Noble Geo-Structs Project No. B1102 August 10, 2010
Sr.
No. BH No. Depth (m)
Width of the
footing (m)
Net SBC
(t/m2)
Settlement,
mm
1 4 1.5 30 6
2 4 2 30 6
3 4 2.5 30 6
4 4 3 30 6
5 4 3.5 30 6
6 4 4 30 6
7 4 4.5 30 6
8 4 5 30 6
9 4 5.5 30 6
10
02
4 6 30 6
RAFT FOUNDATION
Net SBC for Raft foundation is calculated at different locations at various depths
and is given below
SL
NO BH NO
Depth
m
Width of the
Raft
m
Net SBC
t/m2
Settlement
mm
Subgrade
Modulus
(Kg/cm3)
1 2 2 10 30 6 3.6
2 2 2 15 30 6 3.6
NOTE :
Strata should be check during actual excavation of foundation pits.
Geotechnical Investigation at BPCL, Mahul Noble Geo-Structs Project No. B1102 August 10, 2010
PIPE RACK STRUCTURE D
Type Foundation:
As the competent strata is found at shallow depth, OPEN FOUNDATION is recommended for
the proposed site
Net Safe Bearing Capacity
Net Safe Bearing Capacity for the borehole at different depths with various widths is given in the
table below:
Sr.
No. BH No. Depth (m)
Width of the
footing (m)
Net SBC
(t/m2)
Settlement,
mm
1 1 1.5 30 6
2 1 2 30 6
3 1 2.5 30 6
4 1 3 30 6
5 1 3.5 30 6
6 1 4 30 6
7 1 4.5 30 6
8 1 5 30 6
9 1 5.5 30 6
10
11
1 6 30 6
Sr.
No. BH No. Depth (m)
Width of the
footing (m)
Net SBC
(t/m2)
Settlement,
mm
1 1.5 1.5 30 6
2 1.5 2 30 6
3 1.5 2.5 30 6
4 1.5 3 30 6
5 1.5 3.5 30 6
6 1.5 4 30 6
7 1.5 4.5 30 6
8 1.5 5 30 6
9 1.5 5.5 30 6
10
11
1.5 6 30 6
Geotechnical Investigation at BPCL, Mahul Noble Geo-Structs Project No. B1102 August 10, 2010
Sr.
No. BH No. Depth (m)
Width of the
footing (m)
Net SBC
(t/m2)
Settlement,
mm
1 2 1.5 30 6
2 2 2 30 6
3 2 2.5 30 6
4 2 3 30 6
5 2 3.5 30 6
6 2 4 30 6
7 2 4.5 30 6
8 2 5 30 6
9 2 5.5 30 6
10
11
2 6 30 6
Sr.
No. BH No. Depth (m)
Width of the
footing (m)
Net SBC
(t/m2)
Settlement,
mm
1 2.5 1.5 30 6
2 2.5 2 30 6
3 2.5 2.5 30 6
4 2.5 3 30 6
5 2.5 3.5 30 6
6 2.5 4 30 6
7 2.5 4.5 30 6
8 2.5 5 30 6
9 2.5 5.5 30 6
10
11
2.5 6 30 6
Geotechnical Investigation at BPCL, Mahul Noble Geo-Structs Project No. B1102 August 10, 2010
Sr.
No. BH No. Depth (m)
Width of the
footing (m)
Net SBC
(t/m2)
Settlement,
mm
1 3 1.5 30 6
2 3 2 30 6
3 3 2.5 30 6
4 3 3 30 6
5 3 3.5 30 6
6 3 4 30 6
7 3 4.5 30 6
8 3 5 30 6
9 3 5.5 30 6
10
11
3 6 30 6
Sr.
No. BH No. Depth (m)
Width of the
footing (m)
Net SBC
(t/m2)
Settlement,
mm
1 3.5 1.5 30 6
2 3.5 2 30 6
3 3.5 2.5 30 6
4 3.5 3 30 6
5 3.5 3.5 30 6
6 3.5 4 30 6
7 3.5 4.5 30 6
8 3.5 5 30 6
9 3.5 5.5 30 6
10
11
3.5 6 30 6
Geotechnical Investigation at BPCL, Mahul Noble Geo-Structs Project No. B1102 August 10, 2010
Sr.
No. BH No. Depth (m)
Width of the
footing (m)
Net SBC
(t/m2)
Settlement,
mm
1 4 1.5 30 6
2 4 2 30 6
3 4 2.5 30 6
4 4 3 30 6
5 4 3.5 30 6
6 4 4 30 6
7 4 4.5 30 6
8 4 5 30 6
9 4 5.5 30 6
10
11
4 6 30 6
Sr.
No. BH No. Depth (m)
Width of the
footing (m)
Net SBC
(t/m2)
Settlement,
mm
1 5 1.5 30 6
2 5 2 30 6
3 5 2.5 30 6
4 5 3 30 6
5 5 3.5 30 6
6 5 4 30 6
7 5 4.5 30 6
8 5 5 30 6
9 5 5.5 30 6
10
11
5 6 30 6
Geotechnical Investigation at BPCL, Mahul Noble Geo-Structs Project No. B1102 August 10, 2010
RAFT FOUNDATION
Net SBC for Raft foundation is calculated at different locations at various depths
and is given below
SL
NO BH NO
Depth
m
Width of the
Raft
m
Net SBC
t/m2
Settlement
mm
Subgrade
Modulus
(Kg/cm3)
1 11 2 10 30 6 3.6
2 11 2 15 30 6 3.6
NOTE :
Strata should be check during actual excavation of foundation pits.
Geotechnical Investigation at BPCL, Mahul Noble Geo-Structs Project No. B1102 August 10, 2010
FLARE PIPE RACK
Type Foundation:
As the competent strata is found at shallow depth, OPEN FOUNDATION is recommended for
the proposed site
Safe Bearing Capacity
Safe Bearing Capacity for the borehole at different depths with various widths is given in the
table below:
Sr.
No. BH No. Depth (m)
Width of the
footing (m)
Net SBC
(t/m2)
Settlement,
mm
1 1 1.5 14.16 4.45
2 1 2 13.83 5.40
3 1 2.5 13.63 6.36
4 1 3 13.51 7.33
5 1 3.5 13.43 8.28
6 1 4 13.38 9.23
7 1 4.5 13.34 10.18
8 1 5 13.32 11.12
9 1 5.5 13.30 12.05
10
02
1 6 13.29 12.98
Sr.
No. BH No. Depth (m)
Width of the
footing (m)
Net SBC
(t/m2)
Settlement,
mm
1 1.5 1.5 15.07 3.98
2 1.5 2 14.55 4.99
3 1.5 2.5 14.25 5.98
4 1.5 3 14.05 6.96
5 1.5 3.5 13.92 7.92
6 1.5 4 13.83 8.88
7 1.5 4.5 13.76 9.83
8 1.5 5 13.71 10.78
9 1.5 5.5 13.68 11.75
10
02
1.5 6 13.65 12.65
Geotechnical Investigation at BPCL, Mahul Noble Geo-Structs Project No. B1102 August 10, 2010
Sr.
No. BH No. Depth (m)
Width of the
footing (m)
Net SBC
(t/m2)
Settlement,
mm
1 2 1.5 30 6
2 2 2 30 6
3 2 2.5 30 6
4 2 3 30 6
5 2 3.5 30 6
6 2 4 30 6
7 2 4.5 30 6
8 2 5 30 6
9 2 5.5 30 6
10
02
2 6 30 6
Sr.
No. BH No. Depth (m)
Width of the
footing (m)
Net SBC
(t/m2)
Settlement,
mm
1 2.5 1.5 30 6
2 2.5 2 30 6
3 2.5 2.5 30 6
4 2.5 3 30 6
5 2.5 3.5 30 6
6 2.5 4 30 6
7 2.5 4.5 30 6
8 2.5 5 30 6
9 2.5 5.5 30 6
10
02
2.5 6 30 6
Geotechnical Investigation at BPCL, Mahul Noble Geo-Structs Project No. B1102 August 10, 2010
Sr.
No. BH No. Depth (m)
Width of the
footing (m)
Net SBC
(t/m2)
Settlement,
mm
1 3 1.5 30 6
2 3 2 30 6
3 3 2.5 30 6
4 3 3 30 6
5 3 3.5 30 6
6 3 4 30 6
7 3 4.5 30 6
8 3 5 30 6
9 3 5.5 30 6
10
02
3 6 30 6
Sr.
No. BH No. Depth (m)
Width of the
footing (m)
Net SBC
(t/m2)
Settlement,
mm
1 3.5 1.5 30 6
2 3.5 2 30 6
3 3.5 2.5 30 6
4 3.5 3 30 6
5 3.5 3.5 30 6
6 3.5 4 30 6
7 3.5 4.5 30 6
8 3.5 5 30 6
9 3.5 5.5 30 6
10
02
3.5 6 30 6
Geotechnical Investigation at BPCL, Mahul Noble Geo-Structs Project No. B1102 August 10, 2010
Sr.
No. BH No. Depth (m)
Width of the
footing (m)
Net SBC
(t/m2)
Settlement,
mm
1 4 1.5 30 6
2 4 2 30 6
3 4 2.5 30 6
4 4 3 30 6
5 4 3.5 30 6
6 4 4 30 6
7 4 4.5 30 6
8 4 5 30 6
9 4 5.5 30 6
10
02
4 6 30 6
RAFT FOUNDATION
Net SBC for Raft foundation is calculated at different locations at various depths
and is given below
SL
NO BH NO
Depth
m
Width of the
Raft
m
Net SBC
t/m2
Settlement
mm
Subgrade
Modulus
(Kg/cm3)
1 2 2 10 30 6 3.6
2 2 2 15 30 6 3.6
NOTE :
Strata should be check during actual excavation of foundation pits.
Geotechnical Investigation at BPCL, Mahul Noble Geo-Structs Project No. B1102 August 10, 2010
E - W PIPE RACK
Type Foundation:
As the competent strata is found at shallow depth, OPEN FOUNDATION is recommended for
the proposed site
Net Safe Bearing Capacity (For R to J grid)
Net Safe Bearing Capacity for the borehole at different depths with various widths is given in the
table below:
Sr.
No. BH No. Depth (m)
Width of the
footing (m)
Net SBC
(t/m2)
Settlement,
mm
1 1 1.5 14 17
2 1 2 13 20
3 1 2.5 13 22
4 1 3 13 25
5 1 3.5 13 25
6 1 4 12 23
7 1 4.5 12 25
8 1 5 11 24
9 1 5.5 11 25
10
10
1 6 10 24
Sr.
No. BH No. Depth (m)
Width of the
footing (m)
Net SBC
(t/m2)
Settlement,
mm
1 1.5 1.5 15 17
2 1.5 2 14 19
3 1.5 2.5 14 22
4 1.5 3 14 22
5 1.5 3.5 14 23
6 1.5 4 14 25
7 1.5 4.5 13 25
8 1.5 5 12 25
9 1.5 5.5 12 25
10
10
1.5 6 11 24
Geotechnical Investigation at BPCL, Mahul Noble Geo-Structs Project No. B1102 August 10, 2010
Sr.
No. BH No. Depth (m)
Width of the
footing (m)
Net SBC
(t/m2)
Settlement,
mm
1 2 1.5 16 17
2 2 2 15 19
3 2 2.5 15 19
4 2 3 14 19
5 2 3.5 14 21
6 2 4 14 23
7 2 4.5 14 25
8 2 5 13 24
9 2 5.5 13 25
10
10
2 6 12 24
Sr.
No. BH No. Depth (m)
Width of the
footing (m)
Net SBC
(t/m2)
Settlement,
mm
1 2.5 1.5 17 16
2 2.5 2 16 15
3 2.5 2.5 15 16
4 2.5 3 15 19
5 2.5 3.5 15 20
6 2.5 4 15 22
7 2.5 4.5 15 24
8 2.5 5 15 25
9 2.5 5.5 14 25
10
10
2.5 6 13 25
Geotechnical Investigation at BPCL, Mahul Noble Geo-Structs Project No. B1102 August 10, 2010
Sr.
No. BH No. Depth (m)
Width of the
footing (m)
Net SBC
(t/m2)
Settlement,
mm
1 3 1.5 18 12
2 3 2 17 14
3 3 2.5 16 15
4 3 3 16 17
5 3 3.5 16 19
6 3 4 15 19
7 3 4.5 15 21
8 3 5 15 24
9 3 5.5 15 25
10
10
3 6 14 25
Sr.
No. BH No. Depth (m)
Width of the
footing (m)
Net SBC
(t/m2)
Settlement,
mm
1 3.5 1.5 19 10
2 3.5 2 17 11
3 3.5 2.5 16 12
4 3.5 3 16 15
5 3.5 3.5 16 17
6 3.5 4 16 19
7 3.5 4.5 16 22
8 3.5 5 16 24
9 3.5 5.5 15 24
10
10
3.5 6 14 24
Geotechnical Investigation at BPCL, Mahul Noble Geo-Structs Project No. B1102 August 10, 2010
Sr.
No. BH No. Depth (m)
Width of the
footing (m)
Net SBC
(t/m2)
Settlement,
mm
1 4 1.5 20 9
2 4 2 18 11
3 4 2.5 18 13
4 4 3 17 15
5 4 3.5 17 17
6 4 4 16 18
7 4 4.5 16 20
8 4 5 16 22
9 4 5.5 16 25
10
10
4 6 15 25
Sr.
No. BH No. Depth (m)
Width of the
footing (m)
Net SBC
(t/m2)
Settlement,
mm
1 5 1.5 20 4
2 5 2 18.7 5
3 5 2.5 17.8 6
4 5 3 17 7
5 5 3.5 16.60 8
6 5 4 16.30 9
7 5 4.5 16 10
8 5 5 16 11
9 5 5.5 16 12
10
10
5 6 15.6 12
Geotechnical Investigation at BPCL, Mahul Noble Geo-Structs Project No. B1102 August 10, 2010
Sr.
No. BH No. Depth (m)
Width of the
footing (m)
Net SBC
(t/m2)
Settlement,
mm
1 6 1.5 40 6
2 6 2 40 6
3 6 2.5 40 6
4 6 3 40 6
5 6 3.5 40 6
6 6 4 40 6
7 6 4.5 40 6
8 6 5 40 6
9 6 5.5 40 6
10
10
6 6 40 6
RAFT FOUNDATION
Net SBC for Raft foundation is calculated at different locations at various depths
and is given below
SL
NO BH NO
Depth
m
Width of the
Raft
m
Net SBC
t/m2
Settlement
mm
Subgrade
Modulus
(Kg/cm3)
1 10 4 10 19 14.6 2.2
2 10 6 10 40 6 4.8
NOTE :
Strata should be check during actual excavation of foundation pits.
Geotechnical Investigation at BPCL, Mahul Noble Geo-Structs Project No. B1102 August 10, 2010
E - W PIPE RACK
Type Foundation:
As the competent strata is found at shallow depth, OPEN FOUNDATION is recommended for
the proposed site
Net Safe Bearing Capacity (For A to G grid)
Net Safe Bearing Capacity for the borehole at different depths with various widths is given in the
table below:
Sr.
No. BH No. Depth (m)
Width of the
footing (m)
Net SBC
(t/m2)
Settlement,
mm
1 1 1.5 35 6
2 1 2 35 6
3 1 2.5 35 6
4 1 3 35 6
5 1 3.5 35 6
6 1 4 35 6
7 1 4.5 35 6
8 1 5 35 6
9 1 5.5 35 6
10
11
1 6 35 6
Sr.
No. BH No. Depth (m)
Width of the
footing (m)
Net SBC
(t/m2)
Settlement,
mm
1 1.5 1.5 35 6
2 1.5 2 35 6
3 1.5 2.5 35 6
4 1.5 3 35 6
5 1.5 3.5 35 6
6 1.5 4 35 6
7 1.5 4.5 35 6
8 1.5 5 35 6
9 1.5 5.5 35 6
10
11
1.5 6 35 6
Geotechnical Investigation at BPCL, Mahul Noble Geo-Structs Project No. B1102 August 10, 2010
Sr.
No. BH No. Depth (m)
Width of the
footing (m)
Net SBC
(t/m2)
Settlement,
mm
1 2 1.5 35 6
2 2 2 35 6
3 2 2.5 35 6
4 2 3 35 6
5 2 3.5 35 6
6 2 4 35 6
7 2 4.5 35 6
8 2 5 35 6
9 2 5.5 35 6
10
11
2 6 35 6
Sr.
No. BH No. Depth (m)
Width of the
footing (m)
Net SBC
(t/m2)
Settlement,
mm
1 2.5 1.5 35 6
2 2.5 2 35 6
3 2.5 2.5 35 6
4 2.5 3 35 6
5 2.5 3.5 35 6
6 2.5 4 35 6
7 2.5 4.5 35 6
8 2.5 5 35 6
9 2.5 5.5 35 6
10
11
2.5 6 35 6
Geotechnical Investigation at BPCL, Mahul Noble Geo-Structs Project No. B1102 August 10, 2010
Sr.
No. BH No. Depth (m)
Width of the
footing (m)
Net SBC
(t/m2)
Settlement,
mm
1 3 1.5 35 6
2 3 2 35 6
3 3 2.5 35 6
4 3 3 35 6
5 3 3.5 35 6
6 3 4 35 6
7 3 4.5 35 6
8 3 5 35 6
9 3 5.5 35 6
10
11
3 6 35 6
Sr.
No. BH No. Depth (m)
Width of the
footing (m)
Net SBC
(t/m2)
Settlement,
mm
1 3.5 1.5 35 6
2 3.5 2 35 6
3 3.5 2.5 35 6
4 3.5 3 35 6
5 3.5 3.5 35 6
6 3.5 4 35 6
7 3.5 4.5 35 6
8 3.5 5 35 6
9 3.5 5.5 35 6
10
11
3.5 6 35 6
Geotechnical Investigation at BPCL, Mahul Noble Geo-Structs Project No. B1102 August 10, 2010
Sr.
No. BH No. Depth (m)
Width of the
footing (m)
Net SBC
(t/m2)
Settlement,
mm
1 4 1.5 35 6
2 4 2 35 6
3 4 2.5 35 6
4 4 3 35 6
5 4 3.5 35 6
6 4 4 35 6
7 4 4.5 35 6
8 4 5 35 6
9 4 5.5 35 6
10
11
4 6 35 6
RAFT FOUNDATION
Net SBC for Raft foundation is calculated at different locations at various depths
and is given below
SL
NO BH NO
Depth
m
Width of the
Raft
m
Net SBC
t/m2
Settlement
mm
Subgrade
Modulus
(Kg/cm3)
1 11 4 10 35 6 4.2
NOTE :
Strata should be check during actual excavation of foundation pits.
Geotechnical Investigation at BPCL, Mahul Noble Geo-Structs Project No. B1102 August 10, 2010
COMPRESSOR HOUSE 1
Type Foundation:
As the competent strata is found at shallow depth, OPEN FOUNDATION is recommended for
the proposed site
Net Safe Bearing Capacity
Net Safe Bearing Capacity for the borehole at different depths with various widths is given in the
table below:
Sr.
No. BH No. Depth (m)
Width of the
footing (m)
Net SBC
(t/m2)
Settlement,
mm
1 1 1.5 11.7 3
2 1 2 12 4
3 1 2.5 13.5 6
4 1 3 14.3 7
5 1 3.5 15.2 9.5
6 1 4 16 11
7 1 4.5 17 13
8 1 5 18 16
9 1 5.5 19 18
10
16
1 6 20 21
Sr.
No. BH No. Depth (m)
Width of the
footing (m)
Net SBC
(t/m2)
Settlement,
mm
1 1.5 1.5 16 4
2 1.5 2 17 6
3 1.5 2.5 18 8
4 1.5 3 19 10
5 1.5 3.5 20 12
6 1.5 4 21 14
7 1.5 4.5 21.5 17
8 1.5 5 22.5 19
9 1.5 5.5 23 22
10
16
1.5 6 24 25
Geotechnical Investigation at BPCL, Mahul Noble Geo-Structs Project No. B1102 August 10, 2010
Sr.
No. BH No. Depth (m)
Width of the
footing (m)
Net SBC
(t/m2)
Settlement,
mm
1 2 1.5 21 6
2 2 2 22 8
3 2 2.5 23 10
4 2 3 23 12
5 2 3.5 24 15
6 2 4 25 17
7 2 4.5 26 20
8 2 5 27 23
9 2 5.5 26.5 25
10
16
2 6 25 25
Sr.
No. BH No. Depth (m)
Width of the
footing (m)
Net SBC
(t/m2)
Settlement,
mm
1 2.5 1.5 26 7
2 2.5 2 27 10
3 2.5 2.5 27 12
4 2.5 3 28 15
5 2.5 3.5 29 18
6 2.5 4 30 21
7 2.5 4.5 31 24
8 2.5 5 29 25
9 2.5 5.5 27 25
10
16
2.5 6 26 25
Geotechnical Investigation at BPCL, Mahul Noble Geo-Structs Project No. B1102 August 10, 2010
Sr.
No. BH No. Depth (m)
Width of the
footing (m)
Net SBC
(t/m2)
Settlement,
mm
1 3 1.5 40 6
2 3 2 40 6
3 3 2.5 40 6
4 3 3 40 6
5 3 3.5 40 6
6 3 4 40 6
7 3 4.5 40 6
8 3 5 40 6
9 3 5.5 40 6
10
16
3 6 40 6
Sr.
No. BH No. Depth (m)
Width of the
footing (m)
Net SBC
(t/m2)
Settlement,
mm
1 3.5 1.5 40 6
2 3.5 2 40 6
3 3.5 2.5 40 6
4 3.5 3 40 6
5 3.5 3.5 40 6
6 3.5 4 40 6
7 3.5 4.5 40 6
8 3.5 5 40 6
9 3.5 5.5 40 6
10
16
3.5 6 40 6
Geotechnical Investigation at BPCL, Mahul Noble Geo-Structs Project No. B1102 August 10, 2010
Sr.
No. BH No. Depth (m)
Width of the
footing (m)
Net SBC
(t/m2)
Settlement,
mm
1 4 1.5 40 6
2 4 2 40 6
3 4 2.5 40 6
4 4 3 40 6
5 4 3.5 40 6
6 4 4 40 6
7 4 4.5 40 6
8 4 5 40 6
9 4 5.5 40 6
10
16
4 6 40 6
RAFT FOUNDATION
Net SBC for Raft foundation is calculated at different locations at various depths
and is given below
SL
NO BH NO
Depth
m
Width of the
Raft
m
Net SBC
t/m2
Settlement
mm
Subgrade
Modulus
(Kg/cm3)
1 16 3 10 40 6 4.8
2 16 3 15 40 6 4.8
NOTE :
Strata should be check during actual excavation of foundation pits.
Geotechnical Investigation at BPCL, Mahul Noble Geo-Structs Project No. B1102 August 10, 2010
COMPRESSOR HOUSE 2
Type Foundation:
As the competent strata is found at shallow depth, OPEN FOUNDATION is recommended for
the proposed site
Net Safe Bearing Capacity
Net Safe Bearing Capacity for the borehole at different depths with various widths is given in the
table below:
Sr.
No. BH No. Depth (m)
Width of the
footing (m)
Net SBC
(t/m2)
Settlement,
mm
1 1 1.5 12.10 3.63
2 1 2 12.0 4.5
3 1 2.5 12.0 5.39
4 1 3 12.06 6.32
5 1 3.5 12.15 7.27
6 1 4 12.24 8.22
7 1 4.5 12.35 9.19
8 1 5 12.46 10.17
9 1 5.5 12.58 11.17
10
8
1 6 12.71 12.20
Sr.
No. BH No. Depth (m)
Width of the
footing (m)
Net SBC
(t/m2)
Settlement,
mm
1 1.5 1.5 13.57 3.45
2 1.5 2 13.34 4.43
3 1.5 2.5 13.37 5.47
4 1.5 3 13.27 6.42
5 1.5 3.5 13.31 7.42
6 1.5 4 13.37 8.43
7 1.5 4.5 13.46 9.47
8 1.5 5 13.55 10.51
9 1.5 5.5 13.66 11.58
10
8
1.5 6 13.77 12.65
Geotechnical Investigation at BPCL, Mahul Noble Geo-Structs Project No. B1102 August 10, 2010
Sr.
No. BH No. Depth (m)
Width of the
footing (m)
Net SBC
(t/m2)
Settlement,
mm
1 2 1.5 100 6
2 2 2 100 6
3 2 2.5 100 6
4 2 3 100 6
5 2 3.5 100 6
6 2 4 100 6
7 2 4.5 100 6
8 2 5 100 6
9 2 5.5 100 6
10
8
2 6 100 6
Sr.
No. BH No. Depth (m)
Width of the
footing (m)
Net SBC
(t/m2)
Settlement,
mm
1 2.5 1.5 100 6
2 2.5 2 100 6
3 2.5 2.5 100 6
4 2.5 3 100 6
5 2.5 3.5 100 6
6 2.5 4 100 6
7 2.5 4.5 100 6
8 2.5 5 100 6
9 2.5 5.5 100 6
10
8
2.5 6 100 6
Geotechnical Investigation at BPCL, Mahul Noble Geo-Structs Project No. B1102 August 10, 2010
Sr.
No. BH No. Depth (m)
Width of the
footing (m)
Net SBC
(t/m2)
Settlement,
mm
1 3 1.5 100 6
2 3 2 100 6
3 3 2.5 100 6
4 3 3 100 6
5 3 3.5 100 6
6 3 4 100 6
7 3 4.5 100 6
8 3 5 100 6
9 3 5.5 100 6
10
8
3 6 100 6
Sr.
No. BH No. Depth (m)
Width of the
footing (m)
Net SBC
(t/m2)
Settlement,
mm
1 3.5 1.5 100 6
2 3.5 2 100 6
3 3.5 2.5 100 6
4 3.5 3 100 6
5 3.5 3.5 100 6
6 3.5 4 100 6
7 3.5 4.5 100 6
8 3.5 5 100 6
9 3.5 5.5 100 6
10
8
3.5 6 100 6
Geotechnical Investigation at BPCL, Mahul Noble Geo-Structs Project No. B1102 August 10, 2010
Sr.
No. BH No. Depth (m)
Width of the
footing (m)
Net SBC
(t/m2)
Settlement,
mm
1 4 1.5 100 6
2 4 2 100 6
3 4 2.5 100 6
4 4 3 100 6
5 4 3.5 100 6
6 4 4 100 6
7 4 4.5 100 6
8 4 5 100 6
9 4 5.5 100 6
10
8
4 6 100 6
RAFT FOUNDATION
Net SBC for Raft foundation is calculated at different locations at various depths
and is given below
SL
NO BH NO
Depth
m
Width of the
Raft
m
Net SBC
t/m2
Settlement
mm
Subgrade
Modulus
(Kg/cm3)
1 8 3 10 100 6 12
2 8 3 15 100 6 12
NOTE :
Strata should be check during actual excavation of foundation pits.
Geotechnical Investigation at BPCL, Mahul Noble Geo-Structs Project No. B1102 August 10, 2010
COMPRESSOR HOUSE 3
Type Foundation:
As the competent strata is found at shallow depth, OPEN FOUNDATION is recommended for
the proposed site
Net Safe Bearing Capacity
Net Safe Bearing Capacity for the borehole at different depths with various widths is given in the
table below:
Sr.
No. BH No. Depth (m)
Width of the
footing (m)
Net SBC
(t/m2)
Settlement,
mm
1 1 1.5 14 17
2 1 2 13 20
3 1 2.5 13 22
4 1 3 13 25
5 1 3.5 13 25
6 1 4 12 23
7 1 4.5 12 25
8 1 5 11 24
9 1 5.5 11 25
10
10
1 6 10 24
Sr.
No. BH No. Depth (m)
Width of the
footing (m)
Net SBC
(t/m2)
Settlement,
mm
1 1.5 1.5 15 17
2 1.5 2 14 19
3 1.5 2.5 14 22
4 1.5 3 14 22
5 1.5 3.5 14 23
6 1.5 4 14 25
7 1.5 4.5 13 25
8 1.5 5 12 25
9 1.5 5.5 12 25
10
10
1.5 6 11 24
Geotechnical Investigation at BPCL, Mahul Noble Geo-Structs Project No. B1102 August 10, 2010
Sr.
No. BH No. Depth (m)
Width of the
footing (m)
Net SBC
(t/m2)
Settlement,
mm
1 2 1.5 16 17
2 2 2 15 19
3 2 2.5 15 19
4 2 3 14 19
5 2 3.5 14 21
6 2 4 14 23
7 2 4.5 14 25
8 2 5 13 24
9 2 5.5 13 25
10
10
2 6 12 24
Sr.
No. BH No. Depth (m)
Width of the
footing (m)
Net SBC
(t/m2)
Settlement,
mm
1 2.5 1.5 17 16
2 2.5 2 16 15
3 2.5 2.5 15 16
4 2.5 3 15 19
5 2.5 3.5 15 20
6 2.5 4 15 22
7 2.5 4.5 15 24
8 2.5 5 15 25
9 2.5 5.5 14 25
10
10
2.5 6 13 25
Geotechnical Investigation at BPCL, Mahul Noble Geo-Structs Project No. B1102 August 10, 2010
Sr.
No. BH No. Depth (m)
Width of the
footing (m)
Net SBC
(t/m2)
Settlement,
mm
1 3 1.5 18 12
2 3 2 17 14
3 3 2.5 16 15
4 3 3 16 17
5 3 3.5 16 19
6 3 4 15 19
7 3 4.5 15 21
8 3 5 15 24
9 3 5.5 15 25
10
10
3 6 14 25
Sr.
No. BH No. Depth (m)
Width of the
footing (m)
Net SBC
(t/m2)
Settlement,
mm
1 3.5 1.5 19 10
2 3.5 2 17 11
3 3.5 2.5 16 12
4 3.5 3 16 15
5 3.5 3.5 16 17
6 3.5 4 16 19
7 3.5 4.5 16 22
8 3.5 5 16 24
9 3.5 5.5 15 24
10
10
3.5 6 14 24
Geotechnical Investigation at BPCL, Mahul Noble Geo-Structs Project No. B1102 August 10, 2010
Sr.
No. BH No. Depth (m)
Width of the
footing (m)
Net SBC
(t/m2)
Settlement,
mm
1 4 1.5 20 9
2 4 2 18 11
3 4 2.5 18 13
4 4 3 17 15
5 4 3.5 17 17
6 4 4 16 18
7 4 4.5 16 20
8 4 5 16 22
9 4 5.5 16 25
10
10
4 6 15 25
Sr.
No. BH No. Depth (m)
Width of the
footing (m)
Net SBC
(t/m2)
Settlement,
mm
1 5 1.5 20 4
2 5 2 18.7 5
3 5 2.5 17.8 6
4 5 3 17 7
5 5 3.5 16.60 8
6 5 4 16.30 9
7 5 4.5 16 10
8 5 5 16 11
9 5 5.5 16 12
10
10
5 6 15.6 12
Geotechnical Investigation at BPCL, Mahul Noble Geo-Structs Project No. B1102 August 10, 2010
Sr.
No. BH No. Depth (m)
Width of the
footing (m)
Net SBC
(t/m2)
Settlement,
mm
1 6 1.5 40 6
2 6 2 40 6
3 6 2.5 40 6
4 6 3 40 6
5 6 3.5 40 6
6 6 4 40 6
7 6 4.5 40 6
8 6 5 40 6
9 6 5.5 40 6
10
10
6 6 40 6
RAFT FOUNDATION
Net SBC for Raft foundation is calculated at different locations at various depths
and is given below
SL
NO
BH NO Depth
m
Width of the
Raft
m
Net SBC
t/m2
Settlement
mm
Subgrade
Modulus
(Kg/cm3)
1 10 4 10 19 14.6 2.2
2 10 6 10 40 6 4.8
NOTE :
Strata should be check during actual excavation of foundation pits.
Geotechnical Investigation at BPCL, Mahul Noble Geo-Structs Project No. B1102 August 10, 2010
REFRIGRATION PACKAGE
Type Foundation:
As the competent strata is found at shallow depth, OPEN FOUNDATION is recommended for
the proposed site
Net Safe Bearing Capacity
Net Safe Bearing Capacity for the borehole at different depths with various widths is given in the
table below:
Sr.
No. BH No. Depth (m)
Width of the
footing (m)
Net SBC
(t/m2)
Settlement,
mm
1 1 1.5 24 8
2 1 2 25 11
3 1 2.5 25.5 13.5
4 1 3 26 16
5 1 3.5 26.7 19
6 1 4 27 21
7 1 4.5 28 24
8 1 5 26.5 25
9 1 5.5 25 25
10
6
1 6 23.5 25
Sr.
No. BH No. Depth (m)
Width of the
footing (m)
Net SBC
(t/m2)
Settlement,
mm
1 1.5 1.5 29 8
2 1.5 2 29 11
3 1.5 2.5 29.5 14
4 1.5 3 30 17
5 1.5 3.5 30.5 20
6 1.5 4 31 23
7 1.5 4.5 30 25
8 1.5 5 28 25
9 1.5 5.5 26 25
10
6
1.5 6 24.5 25
Geotechnical Investigation at BPCL, Mahul Noble Geo-Structs Project No. B1102 August 10, 2010
Sr.
No. BH No. Depth (m)
Width of the
footing (m)
Net SBC
(t/m2)
Settlement,
mm
1 2 1.5 70 6
2 2 2 70 6
3 2 2.5 70 6
4 2 3 70 6
5 2 3.5 70 6
6 2 4 70 6
7 2 4.5 70 6
8 2 5 70 6
9 2 5.5 70 6
10
6
2 6 70 6
Sr.
No. BH No. Depth (m)
Width of the
footing (m)
Net SBC
(t/m2)
Settlement,
mm
1 2.5 1.5 70 6
2 2.5 2 70 6
3 2.5 2.5 70 6
4 2.5 3 70 6
5 2.5 3.5 70 6
6 2.5 4 70 6
7 2.5 4.5 70 6
8 2.5 5 70 6
9 2.5 5.5 70 6
10
6
2.5 6 70 6
Geotechnical Investigation at BPCL, Mahul Noble Geo-Structs Project No. B1102 August 10, 2010
Sr.
No. BH No. Depth (m)
Width of the
footing (m)
Net SBC
(t/m2)
Settlement,
mm
1 3 1.5 70 6
2 3 2 70 6
3 3 2.5 70 6
4 3 3 70 6
5 3 3.5 70 6
6 3 4 70 6
7 3 4.5 70 6
8 3 5 70 6
9 3 5.5 70 6
10
6
3 6 70 6
Sr.
No. BH No. Depth (m)
Width of the
footing (m)
Net SBC
(t/m2)
Settlement,
mm
1 3.5 1.5 100 6
2 3.5 2 100 6
3 3.5 2.5 100 6
4 3.5 3 100 6
5 3.5 3.5 100 6
6 3.5 4 100 6
7 3.5 4.5 100 6
8 3.5 5 100 6
9 3.5 5.5 100 6
10
6
3.5 6 100 6
Geotechnical Investigation at BPCL, Mahul Noble Geo-Structs Project No. B1102 August 10, 2010
Sr.
No. BH No. Depth (m)
Width of the
footing (m)
Net SBC
(t/m2)
Settlement,
mm
1 4 1.5 100 6
2 4 2 100 6
3 4 2.5 100 6
4 4 3 100 6
5 4 3.5 100 6
6 4 4 100 6
7 4 4.5 100 6
8 4 5 100 6
9 4 5.5 100 6
10
6
4 6 100 6
RAFT FOUNDATION
Net SBC for Raft foundation is calculated at different locations at various depths
and is given below
SL
NO BH NO
Depth
m
Width of the
Raft
m
Net SBC
t/m2
Settlement
mm
Subgrade
Modulus
(Kg/cm3)
1 6 3 10 70 6 8.4
2 6 3 15 70 6 8.4
NOTE :
Strata should be check during actual excavation of foundation pits.
Geotechnical Investigation at BPCL, Mahul Noble Geo-Structs Project No. B1102 August 10, 2010
OSBL AREA
FIELD OPERATOR ROOM
Type Foundation:
As the competent strata is found at shallow depth, OPEN FOUNDATION is recommended for
the proposed site
Net Safe Bearing Capacity
Net Safe Bearing Capacity for the borehole at different depths with various widths is given in the
table below:
Sr.
No. BH No. Depth (m)
Width of the
footing (m)
Net SBC
(t/m2)
Settlement,
mm
1 1 1.5 12 3
2 1 2 13 5
3 1 2.5 13.5 6
4 1 3 14 8
5 1 3.5 15 10
6 1 4 16 11
7 1 4.5 17 13
8 1 5 18 16
9 1 5.5 19 18
10
17
1 6 20 21
Sr.
No. BH No. Depth (m)
Width of the
footing (m)
Net SBC
(t/m2)
Settlement,
mm
1 1.5 1.5 16 3
2 1.5 2 17 6
3 1.5 2.5 18 8
4 1.5 3 19 10
5 1.5 3.5 20 12
6 1.5 4 21 14
7 1.5 4.5 22 17
8 1.5 5 22.5 19
9 1.5 5.5 23 22
10
17
1.5 6 24 25
Geotechnical Investigation at BPCL, Mahul Noble Geo-Structs Project No. B1102 August 10, 2010
Sr.
No. BH No. Depth (m)
Width of the
footing (m)
Net SBC
(t/m2)
Settlement,
mm
1 2 1.5 21 6
2 2 2 22 8
3 2 2.5 23 10
4 2 3 23 12
5 2 3.5 24 15
6 2 4 25 17
7 2 4.5 26 20
8 2 5 27 23
9 2 5.5 26.5 25
10
17
2 6 25 25
Sr.
No. BH No. Depth (m)
Width of the
footing (m)
Net SBC
(t/m2)
Settlement,
mm
1 2.5 1.5 26 7
2 2.5 2 27 10
3 2.5 2.5 27 12
4 2.5 3 28 15
5 2.5 3.5 29 18
6 2.5 4 30 21
7 2.5 4.5 31 24
8 2.5 5 29 25
9 2.5 5.5 27 25
10
17
2.5 6 26 25
Geotechnical Investigation at BPCL, Mahul Noble Geo-Structs Project No. B1102 August 10, 2010
Sr.
No. BH No. Depth (m)
Width of the
footing (m)
Net SBC
(t/m2)
Settlement,
mm
1 3 1.5 31 9
2 3 2 32 11
3 3 2.5 32 14
4 3 3 33 17
5 3 3.5 33.5 21
6 3 4 34 24
7 3 4.5 32 25
8 3 5 30 25
9 3 5.5 27.5 25
10
17
3 6 26 25
Sr.
No. BH No. Depth (m)
Width of the
footing (m)
Net SBC
(t/m2)
Settlement,
mm
1 3.5 1.5 37 10
2 3.5 2 37 13
3 3.5 2.5 37 17
4 3.5 3 37.5 20
5 3.5 3.5 38 24
6 3.5 4 36 25
7 3.5 4.5 25 25
8 3.5 5 30.5 25
9 3.5 5.5 28 25
10
17
3.5 6 26.5 25
Geotechnical Investigation at BPCL, Mahul Noble Geo-Structs Project No. B1102 August 10, 2010
Sr.
No. BH No. Depth (m)
Width of the
footing (m)
Net SBC
(t/m2)
Settlement,
mm
1 4 1.5 30 6
2 4 2 30 6
3 4 2.5 30 6
4 4 3 30 6
5 4 3.5 30 6
6 4 4 30 6
7 4 4.5 30 6
8 4 5 30 6
9 4 5.5 30 6
10
17
4 6 30 6
NOTE :
Strata should be check during actual excavation of foundation pits.
Geotechnical Investigation at BPCL, Mahul Noble Geo-Structs Project No. B1102 August 10, 2010
SUBSTATION AND SATTELITE RACK ROOM
Type Foundation:
As the competent strata is found at shallow depth, OPEN FOUNDATION is recommended for
the proposed site
Net Safe Bearing Capacity
Net Safe Bearing Capacity for the borehole at different depths with various widths is given in the
table below:
Sr.
No. BH No. Depth (m)
Width of the
footing (m)
Net SBC
(t/m2)
Settlement,
mm
1 1 1.5 13 4
2 1 2 13 5
3 1 2.5 13 6
4 1 3 13 7
5 1 3.5 13 8
6 1 4 13 9
7 1 4.5 13 10
8 1 5 13 11
9 1 5.5 13 12
10
22
1 6 13 13
Sr.
No. BH No. Depth (m)
Width of the
footing (m)
Net SBC
(t/m2)
Settlement,
mm
1 1.5 1.5 14 4
2 1.5 2 14 5
3 1.5 2.5 14 6
4 1.5 3 14 7
5 1.5 3.5 14 8
6 1.5 4 14 9
7 1.5 4.5 14 10
8 1.5 5 14 11
9 1.5 5.5 14 12
10
22
1.5 6 14 13
Geotechnical Investigation at BPCL, Mahul Noble Geo-Structs Project No. B1102 August 10, 2010
Sr.
No. BH No. Depth (m)
Width of the
footing (m)
Net SBC
(t/m2)
Settlement,
mm
1 2 1.5 30 6
2 2 2 30 6
3 2 2.5 30 6
4 2 3 30 6
5 2 3.5 30 6
6 2 4 30 6
7 2 4.5 30 6
8 2 5 30 6
9 2 5.5 30 6
10
22
2 6 30 6
Sr.
No. BH No. Depth (m)
Width of the
footing (m)
Net SBC
(t/m2)
Settlement,
mm
1 2.5 1.5 30 6
2 2.5 2 30 6
3 2.5 2.5 30 6
4 2.5 3 30 6
5 2.5 3.5 30 6
6 2.5 4 30 6
7 2.5 4.5 30 6
8 2.5 5 30 6
9 2.5 5.5 30 6
10
22
2.5 6 30 6
Geotechnical Investigation at BPCL, Mahul Noble Geo-Structs Project No. B1102 August 10, 2010
Sr.
No. BH No. Depth (m)
Width of the
footing (m)
Net SBC
(t/m2)
Settlement,
mm
1 3 1.5 40 6
2 3 2 40 6
3 3 2.5 40 6
4 3 3 40 6
5 3 3.5 40 6
6 3 4 40 6
7 3 4.5 40 6
8 3 5 40 6
9 3 5.5 40 6
10
22
3 6 40 6
Sr.
No. BH No. Depth (m)
Width of the
footing (m)
Net SBC
(t/m2)
Settlement,
mm
1 3.5 1.5 40 6
2 3.5 2 40 6
3 3.5 2.5 40 6
4 3.5 3 40 6
5 3.5 3.5 40 6
6 3.5 4 40 6
7 3.5 4.5 40 6
8 3.5 5 40 6
9 3.5 5.5 40 6
10
22
3.5 6 40 6
Geotechnical Investigation at BPCL, Mahul Noble Geo-Structs Project No. B1102 August 10, 2010
Sr.
No. BH No. Depth (m)
Width of the
footing (m)
Net SBC
(t/m2)
Settlement,
mm
1 4 1.5 40 6
2 4 2 40 6
3 4 2.5 40 6
4 4 3 40 6
5 4 3.5 40 6
6 4 4 40 6
7 4 4.5 40 6
8 4 5 40 6
9 4 5.5 40 6
10
22
4 6 40 6
NOTE :
Strata should be check during actual excavation of foundation pits.
As per BH 23 then may be localised loose pockets they must be replaced with big boulders and
plain cement concrete with proper compaction.
Geotechnical Investigation at BPCL, Mahul Noble Geo-Structs Project No. B1102 August 10, 2010
COOLING TOWER
Type Foundation:
As the competent strata is found at shallow depth, OPEN FOUNDATION is recommended for
the proposed site
Net Safe Bearing Capacity
Net Safe Bearing Capacity for the borehole at different depths with various widths is given in the
table below:
Sr.
No. BH No. Depth (m)
Width of the
footing (m)
Net SBC
(t/m2)
Settlement,
mm
1 1 1.5 14.4 4
2 1 2 14 5
3 1 2.5 13.9 6
4 1 3 13.8 7
5 1 3.5 13.7 8
6 1 4 13.7 9
7 1 4.5 13.7 10
8 1 5 13.69 11
9 1 5.5 13.69 12
10
20
1 6 13.69 13
Sr.
No. BH No. Depth (m)
Width of the
footing (m)
Net SBC
(t/m2)
Settlement,
mm
1 1.5 1.5 15 4
2 1.5 2 14.9 5
3 1.5 2.5 14.6 6
4 1.5 3 14.4 7
5 1.5 3.5 14.3 8
6 1.5 4 14.2 9
7 1.5 4.5 14.2 10
8 1.5 5 14.17 11
9 1.5 5.5 14.15 12
10
20
1.5 6 14.14 13
Geotechnical Investigation at BPCL, Mahul Noble Geo-Structs Project No. B1102 August 10, 2010
Sr.
No. BH No. Depth (m)
Width of the
footing (m)
Net SBC
(t/m2)
Settlement,
mm
1 2 1.5 16 4
2 2 2 15.69 5
3 2 2.5 15.31 6
4 2 3 15 7
5 2 3.5 14.9 8
6 2 4 14.79 9
7 2 4.5 14.71 10
8 2 5 14.65 11
9 2 5.5 14.61 12
10
20
2 6 14.5 13
Sr.
No. BH No. Depth (m)
Width of the
footing (m)
Net SBC
(t/m2)
Settlement,
mm
1 2.5 1.5 17 4
2 2.5 2 16.5 5
3 2.5 2.5 16 6
4 2.5 3 15.69 7
5 2.5 3.5 15.5 8
6 2.5 4 15.3 9
7 2.5 4.5 15.2 10
8 2.5 5 15.1 11
9 2.5 5.5 15 12
10
20
2.5 6 15 13
Geotechnical Investigation at BPCL, Mahul Noble Geo-Structs Project No. B1102 August 10, 2010
Sr.
No. BH No. Depth (m)
Width of the
footing (m)
Net SBC
(t/m2)
Settlement,
mm
1 3 1.5 18 4
2 3 2 17 5
3 3 2.5 16.5 6
4 3 3 16.3 7
5 3 3.5 16 8
6 3 4 15.9 9
7 3 4.5 15.7 10
8 3 5 15.6 11
9 3 5.5 15.5 12
10
20
3 6 15.5 13
Sr.
No. BH No. Depth (m)
Width of the
footing (m)
Net SBC
(t/m2)
Settlement,
mm
1 3.5 1.5 19 4
2 3.5 2 18 5
3 3.5 2.5 17.4 6.5
4 3.5 3 16.9 7.5
5 3.5 3.5 16.6 8.5
6 3.5 4 16.4 9.5
7 3.5 4.5 16.2 10.5
8 3.5 5 16.1 11.5
9 3.5 5.5 16 12.5
10
20
3.5 6 15.9 13.5
Geotechnical Investigation at BPCL, Mahul Noble Geo-Structs Project No. B1102 August 10, 2010
Sr.
No. BH No. Depth (m)
Width of the
footing (m)
Net SBC
(t/m2)
Settlement,
mm
1 4 1.5 20 4.6
2 4 2 18.9 5.7
3 4 2.5 18 6.6
4 4 3 17.5 7.6
5 4 3.5 17.2 8.6
6 4 4 16.9 9.6
7 4 4.5 16.7 10.6
8 4 5 16.5 11.6
9 4 5.5 16.5 12.6
10
20
4 6 16.4 13.6
Sr.
No. BH No. Depth (m)
Width of the
footing (m)
Net SBC
(t/m2)
Settlement,
mm
1 5 1.5 70 6
2 5 2 70 6
3 5 2.5 70 6
4 5 3 70 6
5 5 3.5 70 6
6 5 4 70 6
7 5 4.5 70 6
8 5 5 70 6
9 5 5.5 70 6
10
20
5 6 70 6
Geotechnical Investigation at BPCL, Mahul Noble Geo-Structs Project No. B1102 August 10, 2010
RAFT FOUNDATION
Net SBC for Raft foundation is calculated at different locations at various depths
and is given below
SL
NO BH NO
Depth
m
Width of the
Raft
m
Net SBC
t/m2
Settlement
mm
Subgrade
Modulus
(Kg/cm3)
1 20 1 10 13.9 21 1.67
2 20 1.5 10 14.2 21 1.70
3 20 2 10 14.6 21 1.75
4 20 2.5 10 15 21 1.80
5 20 3 10 15.4 21 1.85
6 20 3.5 10 15.7 21 1.88
7 20 4 10 16.10 21.5 1.93
NOTE :
Strata should be check during actual excavation of foundation pits.
Net SBC for Raft foundation is calculated at different locations at various depths and is given
below
SL
NO BH NO
Depth
m
Width of the
Raft
m
Net SBC
t/m2
Settlement
mm
Subgrade
Modulus
(Kg/cm3)
1 20 1 15 11.5 25 1.38
2 20 1.5 15 12 25 1.44
3 20 2 15 12.5 25 1.50
4 20 2.5 15 12.5 25 1.50
5 20 3 15 13 25 1.56
6 20 3.5 15 13 25 1.56
7 20 4 15 13.5 25 1.62
NOTE :
Strata should be check during actual excavation of foundation pits.
Geotechnical Investigation at BPCL, Mahul Noble Geo-Structs Project No. B1102 August 10, 2010
BOREHOLE WISE SAFE BEARING CAPACITY
Type Foundation:
As the competent strata is found at shallow depth, OPEN FOUNDATION is recommended for
the proposed site
Net Safe Bearing Capacity
Net Safe Bearing Capacity for the borehole at different depths with various widths is given in the
table below:
Sr.
No. BH No. Depth (m)
Width of the
footing (m)
Net SBC
(t/m2)
Settlement,
mm
1 1 1.5 14 4
2 1 2 13.8 5
3 1 2.5 13.6 6
4 1 3 13.5 7
5 1 3.5 13.4 8
6 1 4 13.3 9
7 1 4.5 13.3 10
8 1 5 13.3 11
9 1 5.5 13.3 12
10
01
1 6 13.3 13
Sr.
No. BH No. Depth (m)
Width of the
footing (m)
Net SBC
(t/m2)
Settlement,
mm
1 1.5 1.5 70 6
2 1.5 2 70 6
3 1.5 2.5 70 6
4 1.5 3 70 6
5 1.5 3.5 70 6
6 1.5 4 70 6
7 1.5 4.5 70 6
8 1.5 5 70 6
9 1.5 5.5 70 6
10
01
1.5 6 70 6
Geotechnical Investigation at BPCL, Mahul Noble Geo-Structs Project No. B1102 August 10, 2010
Sr.
No. BH No. Depth (m)
Width of the
footing (m)
Net SBC
(t/m2)
Settlement,
mm
1 2 1.5 70 6
2 2 2 70 6
3 2 2.5 70 6
4 2 3 70 6
5 2 3.5 70 6
6 2 4 70 6
7 2 4.5 70 6
8 2 5 70 6
9 2 5.5 70 6
10
01
2 6 70 6
Sr.
No. BH No. Depth (m)
Width of the
footing (m)
Net SBC
(t/m2)
Settlement,
mm
1 2.5 1.5 70 6
2 2.5 2 70 6
3 2.5 2.5 70 6
4 2.5 3 70 6
5 2.5 3.5 70 6
6 2.5 4 70 6
7 2.5 4.5 70 6
8 2.5 5 70 6
9 2.5 5.5 70 6
10
01
2.5 6 70 6
Geotechnical Investigation at BPCL, Mahul Noble Geo-Structs Project No. B1102 August 10, 2010
Sr.
No. BH No. Depth (m)
Width of the
footing (m)
Net SBC
(t/m2)
Settlement,
mm
1 3 1.5 70 6
2 3 2 70 6
3 3 2.5 70 6
4 3 3 70 6
5 3 3.5 70 6
6 3 4 70 6
7 3 4.5 70 6
8 3 5 70 6
9 3 5.5 70 6
10
01
3 6 70 6
Sr.
No. BH No. Depth (m)
Width of the
footing (m)
Net SBC
(t/m2)
Settlement,
mm
1 3.5 1.5 70 6
2 3.5 2 70 6
3 3.5 2.5 70 6
4 3.5 3 70 6
5 3.5 3.5 70 6
6 3.5 4 70 6
7 3.5 4.5 70 6
8 3.5 5 70 6
9 3.5 5.5 70 6
10
01
3.5 6 70 6
Geotechnical Investigation at BPCL, Mahul Noble Geo-Structs Project No. B1102 August 10, 2010
Sr.
No. BH No. Depth (m)
Width of the
footing (m)
Net SBC
(t/m2)
Settlement,
mm
1 4 1.5 70 6
2 4 2 70 6
3 4 2.5 70 6
4 4 3 70 6
5 4 3.5 70 6
6 4 4 70 6
7 4 4.5 70 6
8 4 5 70 6
9 4 5.5 70 6
10
01
4 6 70 6
Geotechnical Investigation at BPCL, Mahul Noble Geo-Structs Project No. B1102 August 10, 2010
Type Foundation:
As the competent strata is found at shallow depth, OPEN FOUNDATION is recommended for
the proposed site
Net Safe Bearing Capacity
Net Safe Bearing Capacity for the borehole at different depths with various widths is given in the
table below:
Sr.
No. BH No. Depth (m)
Width of the
footing (m)
Net SBC
(t/m2)
Settlement,
mm
1 1 1.5 15 5
2 1 2 15 6
3 1 2.5 15 7
4 1 3 14.7 8
5 1 3.5 14.6 9
6 1 4 14.5 10
7 1 4.5 14.5 11
8 1 5 14.5 12
9 1 5.5 14.5 13
10
03
1 6 14.5 14
Sr.
No. BH No. Depth (m)
Width of the
footing (m)
Net SBC
(t/m2)
Settlement,
mm
1 1.5 1.5 100 6
2 1.5 2 100 6
3 1.5 2.5 100 6
4 1.5 3 100 6
5 1.5 3.5 100 6
6 1.5 4 100 6
7 1.5 4.5 100 6
8 1.5 5 100 6
9 1.5 5.5 100 6
10
03
1.5 6 100 6
Geotechnical Investigation at BPCL, Mahul Noble Geo-Structs Project No. B1102 August 10, 2010
Sr.
No. BH No. Depth (m)
Width of the
footing (m)
Net SBC
(t/m2)
Settlement,
mm
1 2 1.5 100 6
2 2 2 100 6
3 2 2.5 100 6
4 2 3 100 6
5 2 3.5 100 6
6 2 4 100 6
7 2 4.5 100 6
8 2 5 100 6
9 2 5.5 100 6
10
03
2 6 100 6
Sr.
No. BH No. Depth (m)
Width of the
footing (m)
Net SBC
(t/m2)
Settlement,
mm
1 2.5 1.5 100 6
2 2.5 2 100 6
3 2.5 2.5 100 6
4 2.5 3 100 6
5 2.5 3.5 100 6
6 2.5 4 100 6
7 2.5 4.5 100 6
8 2.5 5 100 6
9 2.5 5.5 100 6
10
03
2.5 6 100 6
Geotechnical Investigation at BPCL, Mahul Noble Geo-Structs Project No. B1102 August 10, 2010
Sr.
No. BH No. Depth (m)
Width of the
footing (m)
Net SBC
(t/m2)
Settlement,
mm
1 3 1.5 100 6
2 3 2 100 6
3 3 2.5 100 6
4 3 3 100 6
5 3 3.5 100 6
6 3 4 100 6
7 3 4.5 100 6
8 3 5 100 6
9 3 5.5 100 6
10
03
3 6 100 6
Sr.
No. BH No. Depth (m)
Width of the
footing (m)
Net SBC
(t/m2)
Settlement,
mm
1 3.5 1.5 100 6
2 3.5 2 100 6
3 3.5 2.5 100 6
4 3.5 3 100 6
5 3.5 3.5 100 6
6 3.5 4 100 6
7 3.5 4.5 100 6
8 3.5 5 100 6
9 3.5 5.5 100 6
10
03
3.5 6 100 6
Geotechnical Investigation at BPCL, Mahul Noble Geo-Structs Project No. B1102 August 10, 2010
Sr.
No. BH No. Depth (m)
Width of the
footing (m)
Net SBC
(t/m2)
Settlement,
mm
1 4 1.5 100 6
2 4 2 100 6
3 4 2.5 100 6
4 4 3 100 6
5 4 3.5 100 6
6 4 4 100 6
7 4 4.5 100 6
8 4 5 100 6
9 4 5.5 100 6
10
03
4 6 100 6
Geotechnical Investigation at BPCL, Mahul Noble Geo-Structs Project No. B1102 August 10, 2010
Type Foundation:
As the competent strata is found at shallow depth, OPEN FOUNDATION is recommended for
the proposed site
Net Safe Bearing Capacity
Net Safe Bearing Capacity for the borehole at different depths with various widths is given in the
table below:
Sr.
No. BH No. Depth (m)
Width of the
footing (m)
Net SBC
(t/m2)
Settlement,
mm
1 1 1.5 30 6
2 1 2 30 6
3 1 2.5 30 6
4 1 3 30 6
5 1 3.5 30 6
6 1 4 30 6
7 1 4.5 30 6
8 1 5 30 6
9 1 5.5 30 6
10
04
1 6 30 6
Sr.
No. BH No. Depth (m)
Width of the
footing (m)
Net SBC
(t/m2)
Settlement,
mm
1 1.5 1.5 30 6
2 1.5 2 30 6
3 1.5 2.5 30 6
4 1.5 3 30 6
5 1.5 3.5 30 6
6 1.5 4 30 6
7 1.5 4.5 30 6
8 1.5 5 30 6
9 1.5 5.5 30 6
10
04
1.5 6 30 6
Geotechnical Investigation at BPCL, Mahul Noble Geo-Structs Project No. B1102 August 10, 2010
Sr.
No. BH No. Depth (m)
Width of the
footing (m)
Net SBC
(t/m2)
Settlement,
mm
1 2 1.5 30 6
2 2 2 30 6
3 2 2.5 30 6
4 2 3 30 6
5 2 3.5 30 6
6 2 4 30 6
7 2 4.5 30 6
8 2 5 30 6
9 2 5.5 30 6
10
04
2 6 30 6
Sr.
No. BH No. Depth (m)
Width of the
footing (m)
Net SBC
(t/m2)
Settlement,
mm
1 2.5 1.5 30 6
2 2.5 2 30 6
3 2.5 2.5 30 6
4 2.5 3 30 6
5 2.5 3.5 30 6
6 2.5 4 30 6
7 2.5 4.5 30 6
8 2.5 5 30 6
9 2.5 5.5 30 6
10
04
2.5 6 30 6
Geotechnical Investigation at BPCL, Mahul Noble Geo-Structs Project No. B1102 August 10, 2010
Sr.
No. BH No. Depth (m)
Width of the
footing (m)
Net SBC
(t/m2)
Settlement,
mm
1 3 1.5 30 6
2 3 2 30 6
3 3 2.5 30 6
4 3 3 30 6
5 3 3.5 30 6
6 3 4 30 6
7 3 4.5 30 6
8 3 5 30 6
9 3 5.5 30 6
10
04
3 6 30 6
Sr.
No. BH No. Depth (m)
Width of the
footing (m)
Net SBC
(t/m2)
Settlement,
mm
1 3.5 1.5 30 6
2 3.5 2 30 6
3 3.5 2.5 30 6
4 3.5 3 30 6
5 3.5 3.5 30 6
6 3.5 4 30 6
7 3.5 4.5 30 6
8 3.5 5 30 6
9 3.5 5.5 30 6
10
04
3.5 6 30 6
Geotechnical Investigation at BPCL, Mahul Noble Geo-Structs Project No. B1102 August 10, 2010
Sr.
No. BH No. Depth (m)
Width of the
footing (m)
Net SBC
(t/m2)
Settlement,
mm
1 4 1.5 30 6
2 4 2 30 6
3 4 2.5 30 6
4 4 3 30 6
5 4 3.5 30 6
6 4 4 30 6
7 4 4.5 30 6
8 4 5 30 6
9 4 5.5 30 6
10
04
4 6 30 6
Geotechnical Investigation at BPCL, Mahul Noble Geo-Structs Project No. B1102 August 10, 2010
Type Foundation:
As the competent strata is found at shallow depth, OPEN FOUNDATION is recommended for
the proposed site
Net Safe Bearing Capacity
Net Safe Bearing Capacity for the borehole at different depths with various widths is given in the
table below:
Sr.
No. BH No. Depth (m)
Width of the
footing (m)
Net SBC
(t/m2)
Settlement,
mm
1 1 1.5 13.19 4.08
2 1 2 12.89 4.96
3 1 2.5 12.72 5.85
4 1 3 12.62 6.75
5 1 3.5 12.56 7.64
6 1 4 12.51 8.53
7 1 4.5 12.49 9.41
8 1 5 12.47 10.29
9 1 5.5 12.46 11.16
10
05
1 6 12.46 12.04
Sr.
No. BH No. Depth (m)
Width of the
footing (m)
Net SBC
(t/m2)
Settlement,
mm
1 1.5 1.5 14.06 3.65
2 1.5 2 13.60 4.59
3 1.5 2.5 13.33 5.52
4 1.5 3 13.16 6.43
5 1.5 3.5 13.05 7.33
6 1.5 4 12.97 8.23
7 1.5 4.5 12.92 9.12
8 1.5 5 12.88 10
9 1.5 5.5 12.86 10.89
10
05
1.5 6 12.84 11.79
Geotechnical Investigation at BPCL, Mahul Noble Geo-Structs Project No. B1102 August 10, 2010
Sr.
No. BH No. Depth (m)
Width of the
footing (m)
Net SBC
(t/m2)
Settlement,
mm
1 2 1.5 70 6
2 2 2 70 6
3 2 2.5 70 6
4 2 3 70 6
5 2 3.5 70 6
6 2 4 70 6
7 2 4.5 70 6
8 2 5 70 6
9 2 5.5 70 6
10
05
2 6 70 6
Sr.
No. BH No. Depth (m)
Width of the
footing (m)
Net SBC
(t/m2)
Settlement,
mm
1 2.5 1.5 70 6
2 2.5 2 70 6
3 2.5 2.5 70 6
4 2.5 3 70 6
5 2.5 3.5 70 6
6 2.5 4 70 6
7 2.5 4.5 70 6
8 2.5 5 70 6
9 2.5 5.5 70 6
10
05
2.5 6 70 6
Geotechnical Investigation at BPCL, Mahul Noble Geo-Structs Project No. B1102 August 10, 2010
Sr.
No. BH No. Depth (m)
Width of the
footing (m)
Net SBC
(t/m2)
Settlement,
mm
1 3 1.5 70 6
2 3 2 70 6
3 3 2.5 70 6
4 3 3 70 6
5 3 3.5 70 6
6 3 4 70 6
7 3 4.5 70 6
8 3 5 70 6
9 3 5.5 70 6
10
05
3 6 70 6
Sr.
No. BH No. Depth (m)
Width of the
footing (m)
Net SBC
(t/m2)
Settlement,
mm
1 3.5 1.5 70 6
2 3.5 2 70 6
3 3.5 2.5 70 6
4 3.5 3 70 6
5 3.5 3.5 70 6
6 3.5 4 70 6
7 3.5 4.5 70 6
8 3.5 5 70 6
9 3.5 5.5 70 6
10
05
3.5 6 70 6
Geotechnical Investigation at BPCL, Mahul Noble Geo-Structs Project No. B1102 August 10, 2010
Sr.
No. BH No. Depth (m)
Width of the
footing (m)
Net SBC
(t/m2)
Settlement,
mm
1 4 1.5 70 6
2 4 2 70 6
3 4 2.5 70 6
4 4 3 70 6
5 4 3.5 70 6
6 4 4 70 6
7 4 4.5 70 6
8 4 5 70 6
9 4 5.5 70 6
10
05
4 6 70 6
Geotechnical Investigation at BPCL, Mahul Noble Geo-Structs Project No. B1102 August 10, 2010
Type Foundation:
As the competent strata is found at shallow depth, OPEN FOUNDATION is recommended for
the proposed site
Net Safe Bearing Capacity
Net Safe Bearing Capacity for the borehole at different depths with various widths is given in the
table below:
Sr.
No. BH No. Depth (m)
Width of the
footing (m)
Net SBC
(t/m2)
Settlement,
mm
1 1 1.5 10 5
2 1 2 11 7
3 1 2.5 11.8 9
4 1 3 12.5 11
5 1 3.5 13.4 12
6 1 4 14.1 13
7 1 4.5 15 15
8 1 5 15.7 17
9 1 5.5 16.5 20
10
18
1 6 17.3 22
Sr.
No. BH No. Depth (m)
Width of the
footing (m)
Net SBC
(t/m2)
Settlement,
mm
1 1.5 1.5 14.5 7
2 1.5 2 15.1 9
3 1.5 2.5 15.8 12
4 1.5 3 16.5 13
5 1.5 3.5 17.3 14
6 1.5 4 18 16
7 1.5 4.5 19 18.5
8 1.5 5 19.7 21
9 1.5 5.5 20 23
10
18
1.5 6 21 25
Geotechnical Investigation at BPCL, Mahul Noble Geo-Structs Project No. B1102 August 10, 2010
Sr.
No. BH No. Depth (m)
Width of the
footing (m)
Net SBC
(t/m2)
Settlement,
mm
1 2 1.5 18.8 9
2 2 2 19.3 11
3 2 2.5 20 12
4 2 3 21 14
5 2 3.5 21.4 16
6 2 4 22 19
7 2 4.5 23 21
8 2 5 24 23
9 2 5.5 23.5 25
10
18
2 6 22.5 25
Sr.
No. BH No. Depth (m)
Width of the
footing (m)
Net SBC
(t/m2)
Settlement,
mm
1 2.5 1.5 23 11
2 2.5 2 23.6 12
3 2.5 2.5 24.1 14
4 2.5 3 24.8 16
5 2.5 3.5 25.4 18
6 2.5 4 26.1 21
7 2.5 4.5 26.9 23
8 2.5 5 27 25
9 2.5 5.5 25 25
10
18
2.5 6 24 25
Geotechnical Investigation at BPCL, Mahul Noble Geo-Structs Project No. B1102 August 10, 2010
Sr.
No. BH No. Depth (m)
Width of the
footing (m)
Net SBC
(t/m2)
Settlement,
mm
1 3 1.5 28 10
2 3 2 28 12
3 3 2.5 26.4 15
4 3 3 29 17
5 3 3.5 30 20
6 3 4 30.2 23
7 3 4.5 30.5 25
8 3 5 28.5 25
9 3 5.5 26.5 25
10
18
3 6 25 25
Sr.
No. BH No. Depth (m)
Width of the
footing (m)
Net SBC
(t/m2)
Settlement,
mm
1 3.5 1.5 32 9
2 3.5 2 32.5 12
3 3.5 2.5 32.8 15
4 3.5 3 33 18
5 3.5 3.5 33.8 21
6 3.5 4 34 25
7 3.5 4.5 32 25
8 3.5 5 29.5 25
9 3.5 5.5 27.5 25
10
18
3.5 6 26 25
Geotechnical Investigation at BPCL, Mahul Noble Geo-Structs Project No. B1102 August 10, 2010
Sr.
No. BH No. Depth (m)
Width of the
footing (m)
Net SBC
(t/m2)
Settlement,
mm
1 4 1.5 37.5 10
2 4 2 37 13
3 4 2.5 37 16
4 4 3 37.5 20
5 4 3.5 38 23
6 4 4 37 25
7 4 4.5 33.5 25
8 4 5 31 25
9 4 5.5 29 25
10
18
4 6 27 25
Geotechnical Investigation at BPCL, Mahul Noble Geo-Structs Project No. B1102 August 10, 2010
Type Foundation:
As the competent strata is found at shallow depth, OPEN FOUNDATION is recommended for
the proposed site
Net Safe Bearing Capacity
Net Safe Bearing Capacity for the borehole at different depths with various widths is given in the
table below:
Sr.
No. BH No. Depth (m)
Width of the
footing (m)
Net SBC
(t/m2)
Settlement,
mm
1 1 1.5 14.4 4
2 1 2 14 5
3 1 2.5 13.9 6
4 1 3 13.8 7
5 1 3.5 13.7 8
6 1 4 13.7 9
7 1 4.5 13.7 10
8 1 5 13.69 11
9 1 5.5 13.69 12
10
19
1 6 13.69 13
Sr.
No. BH No. Depth (m)
Width of the
footing (m)
Net SBC
(t/m2)
Settlement,
mm
1 1.5 1.5 15 4
2 1.5 2 14.9 5
3 1.5 2.5 14.6 6
4 1.5 3 14.4 7
5 1.5 3.5 14.3 8
6 1.5 4 14.2 9
7 1.5 4.5 14.2 10
8 1.5 5 14.17 11
9 1.5 5.5 14.15 12
10
19
1.5 6 14.14 13
Geotechnical Investigation at BPCL, Mahul Noble Geo-Structs Project No. B1102 August 10, 2010
Sr.
No. BH No. Depth (m)
Width of the
footing (m)
Net SBC
(t/m2)
Settlement,
mm
1 2 1.5 16 4
2 2 2 15.69 5
3 2 2.5 15.31 6
4 2 3 15 7
5 2 3.5 14.9 8
6 2 4 14.79 9
7 2 4.5 14.71 10
8 2 5 14.65 11
9 2 5.5 14.61 12
10
19
2 6 14.5 13
Sr.
No. BH No. Depth (m)
Width of the
footing (m)
Net SBC
(t/m2)
Settlement,
mm
1 2.5 1.5 17 4
2 2.5 2 16.5 5
3 2.5 2.5 16 6
4 2.5 3 15.69 7
5 2.5 3.5 15.5 8
6 2.5 4 15.3 9
7 2.5 4.5 15.2 10
8 2.5 5 15.1 11
9 2.5 5.5 15 12
10
19
2.5 6 15 13
Geotechnical Investigation at BPCL, Mahul Noble Geo-Structs Project No. B1102 August 10, 2010
Sr.
No. BH No. Depth (m)
Width of the
footing (m)
Net SBC
(t/m2)
Settlement,
mm
1 3 1.5 18 4
2 3 2 17 5
3 3 2.5 16.5 6
4 3 3 16.3 7
5 3 3.5 16 8
6 3 4 15.9 9
7 3 4.5 15.7 10
8 3 5 15.6 11
9 3 5.5 15.5 12
10
19
3 6 15.5 13
Sr.
No. BH No. Depth (m)
Width of the
footing (m)
Net SBC
(t/m2)
Settlement,
mm
1 3.5 1.5 19 4
2 3.5 2 18 5
3 3.5 2.5 17.4 6.5
4 3.5 3 16.9 7.5
5 3.5 3.5 16.6 8.5
6 3.5 4 16.4 9.5
7 3.5 4.5 16.2 10.5
8 3.5 5 16.1 11.5
9 3.5 5.5 16 12.5
10
19
3.5 6 15.9 13.5
Geotechnical Investigation at BPCL, Mahul Noble Geo-Structs Project No. B1102 August 10, 2010
Sr.
No. BH No. Depth (m)
Width of the
footing (m)
Net SBC
(t/m2)
Settlement,
mm
1 4 1.5 20 4.6
2 4 2 18.9 5.7
3 4 2.5 18 6.6
4 4 3 17.5 7.6
5 4 3.5 17.2 8.6
6 4 4 16.9 9.6
7 4 4.5 16.7 10.6
8 4 5 16.5 11.6
9 4 5.5 16.5 12.6
10
19
4 6 16.4 13.6
Sr.
No. BH No. Depth (m)
Width of the
footing (m)
Net SBC
(t/m2)
Settlement,
mm
1 5 1.5 70 6
2 5 2 70 6
3 5 2.5 70 6
4 5 3 70 6
5 5 3.5 70 6
6 5 4 70 6
7 5 4.5 70 6
8 5 5 70 6
9 5 5.5 70 6
10
19
5 6 70 6
Geotechnical Investigation at BPCL, Mahul Noble Geo-Structs Project No. B1102 August 10, 2010
Type Foundation:
As the competent strata is found at shallow depth, OPEN FOUNDATION is recommended for
the proposed site
Net Safe Bearing Capacity
Net Safe Bearing Capacity for the borehole at different depths with various widths is given in the
table below:
Sr.
No. BH No. Depth (m)
Width of the
footing (m)
Net SBC
(t/m2)
Settlement,
mm
1 1 1.5 60 6
2 1 2 60 6
3 1 2.5 60 6
4 1 3 60 6
5 1 3.5 60 6
6 1 4 60 6
7 1 4.5 60 6
8 1 5 60 6
9 1 5.5 60 6
10
21
1 6 60 6
Sr.
No. BH No. Depth (m)
Width of the
footing (m)
Net SBC
(t/m2)
Settlement,
mm
1 1.5 1.5 60 6
2 1.5 2 60 6
3 1.5 2.5 60 6
4 1.5 3 60 6
5 1.5 3.5 60 6
6 1.5 4 60 6
7 1.5 4.5 60 6
8 1.5 5 60 6
9 1.5 5.5 60 6
10
21
1.5 6 60 6
Geotechnical Investigation at BPCL, Mahul Noble Geo-Structs Project No. B1102 August 10, 2010
Sr.
No. BH No. Depth (m)
Width of the
footing (m)
Net SBC
(t/m2)
Settlement,
mm
1 2 1.5 60 6
2 2 2 60 6
3 2 2.5 60 6
4 2 3 60 6
5 2 3.5 60 6
6 2 4 60 6
7 2 4.5 60 6
8 2 5 60 6
9 2 5.5 60 6
10
21
2 6 60 6
Sr.
No. BH No. Depth (m)
Width of the
footing (m)
Net SBC
(t/m2)
Settlement,
mm
1 2.5 1.5 60 6
2 2.5 2 60 6
3 2.5 2.5 60 6
4 2.5 3 60 6
5 2.5 3.5 60 6
6 2.5 4 60 6
7 2.5 4.5 60 6
8 2.5 5 60 6
9 2.5 5.5 60 6
10
21
2.5 6 60 6
Geotechnical Investigation at BPCL, Mahul Noble Geo-Structs Project No. B1102 August 10, 2010
Sr.
No. BH No. Depth (m)
Width of the
footing (m)
Net SBC
(t/m2)
Settlement,
mm
1 3 1.5 60 6
2 3 2 60 6
3 3 2.5 60 6
4 3 3 60 6
5 3 3.5 60 6
6 3 4 60 6
7 3 4.5 60 6
8 3 5 60 6
9 3 5.5 60 6
10
21
3 6 60 6
Sr.
No. BH No. Depth (m)
Width of the
footing (m)
Net SBC
(t/m2)
Settlement,
mm
1 3.5 1.5 70 6
2 3.5 2 70 6
3 3.5 2.5 70 6
4 3.5 3 70 6
5 3.5 3.5 70 6
6 3.5 4 70 6
7 3.5 4.5 70 6
8 3.5 5 70 6
9 3.5 5.5 70 6
10
21
3.5 6 70 6
Geotechnical Investigation at BPCL, Mahul Noble Geo-Structs Project No. B1102 August 10, 2010
Sr.
No. BH No. Depth (m)
Width of the
footing (m)
Net SBC
(t/m2)
Settlement,
mm
1 4 1.5 70 6
2 4 2 70 6
3 4 2.5 70 6
4 4 3 70 6
5 4 3.5 70 6
6 4 4 70 6
7 4 4.5 70 6
8 4 5 70 6
9 4 5.5 70 6
10
21
4 6 70 6
Geotechnical Investigation at BPCL, Mahul Noble Geo-Structs Project No. B1102 August 10, 2010
Type Foundation:
As the competent strata is found at shallow depth, OPEN FOUNDATION is recommended for
the proposed site
Net Safe Bearing Capacity
Net Safe Bearing Capacity for the borehole at different depths with various widths is given in the
table below:
Sr.
No. BH No. Depth (m)
Width of the
footing (m)
Net SBC
(t/m2)
Settlement,
mm
1 1 1.5 14 7
2 1 2 13.6 9
3 1 2.5 13.5 12
4 1 3 13.5 14
5 1 3.5 13.4 16
6 1 4 13.4 17
7 1 4.5 13.4 19
8 1 5 13.4 20
9 1 5.5 13.5 21
10
23
1 6 13.5 22
Sr.
No. BH No. Depth (m)
Width of the
footing (m)
Net SBC
(t/m2)
Settlement,
mm
1 1.5 1.5 15 8
2 1.5 2 14.6 10
3 1.5 2.5 14.4 12
4 1.5 3 14.2 14
5 1.5 3.5 14.1 16
6 1.5 4 14.1 18
7 1.5 4.5 14 19
8 1.5 5 14 20
9 1.5 5.5 14 21
10
23
1.5 6 14 22
Geotechnical Investigation at BPCL, Mahul Noble Geo-Structs Project No. B1102 August 10, 2010
Sr.
No. BH No. Depth (m)
Width of the
footing (m)
Net SBC
(t/m2)
Settlement,
mm
1 2 1.5 16.1 8
2 2 2 15.5 10
3 2 2.5 15.2 12
4 2 3 15 14
5 2 3.5 14.9 16
6 2 4 14.8 17
7 2 4.5 14.8 18
8 2 5 14.7 20
9 2 5.5 14.7 21
10
23
2 6 14.7 21
Sr.
No. BH No. Depth (m)
Width of the
footing (m)
Net SBC
(t/m2)
Settlement,
mm
1 2.5 1.5 17.3 8
2 2.5 2 16.5 10
3 2.5 2.5 16 13
4 2.5 3 15.8 15
5 2.5 3.5 15.6 16
6 2.5 4 15.5 17
7 2.5 4.5 15.4 18
8 2.5 5 15.3 20
9 2.5 5.5 15.3 20
10
23
2.5 6 15.3 20
Geotechnical Investigation at BPCL, Mahul Noble Geo-Structs Project No. B1102 August 10, 2010
Sr.
No. BH No. Depth (m)
Width of the
footing (m)
Net SBC
(t/m2)
Settlement,
mm
1 3 1.5 18 9
2 3 2 17.5 11
3 3 2.5 17 13
4 3 3 16.6 15
5 3 3.5 16.4 16
6 3 4 16.2 17
7 3 4.5 16.1 18
8 3 5 16.1 18
9 3 5.5 16 18
10
23
3 6 16 20
Sr.
No. BH No. Depth (m)
Width of the
footing (m)
Net SBC
(t/m2)
Settlement,
mm
1 3.5 1.5 19.7 9
2 3.5 2 18.5 11
3 3.5 2.5 17.9 14
4 3.5 3 17.4 15
5 3.5 3.5 17.1 16
6 3.5 4 17 17
7 3.5 4.5 16.8 17
8 3.5 5 16.7 17
9 3.5 5.5 16.6 18
10
23
3.5 6 16.5 19
Geotechnical Investigation at BPCL, Mahul Noble Geo-Structs Project No. B1102 August 10, 2010
Sr.
No. BH No. Depth (m)
Width of the
footing (m)
Net SBC
(t/m2)
Settlement,
mm
1 4 1.5 21 10
2 4 2 20 12
3 4 2.5 19 13
4 4 3 18.3 14
5 4 3.5 18 16
6 4 4 17.7 16
7 4 4.5 17.5 16
8 4 5 17.3 17
9 4 5.5 17.3 18
10
23
4 6 17.1 19
Geotechnical Investigation at BPCL, Mahul Noble Geo-Structs Project No. B1102 August 10, 2010
REFERENCES
IS : 2131 - Standard Penetration Test
IS : 2720 Part – II - Determination of Moisture Content of soil.
IS : 2720 Part – III - Determination of Specific Gravity of Soil.
IS : 2720 Part – V - Determination of Liquid Limit and Plastic Limit of Soil.
IS : 2720 Part – VI - Determination of Shrinkage Limit of Soil.
IS : 2720 Part – IV - Grain Size Analysis of Soil.
IS : 2720 Part – XXVII - Determination of Sulphate Content of Soil.
IS : 2720 Part – XXVI - Determination of pH Value of Soil.
IS : 3025 Part – 24 - Determination of Sulphate Content of Water.
IS : 3025 Part – 32 - Determination of Chloride Content of Water.
IS : 1498 – 1970 - Indian Classification system.
BIS13030 : 1991 - Determination of Water Absorption and Porosity on Rock
BIS 13030 : 1991 - Determination of Unit weight of Rock.
BIS 9143 : 1979 - Determination of Unconfined Compressive Strength of Rock core
Dr. N. V. Nayak - Foundation Manual
Geotechnical Investigation at BPCL, Mahul Noble Geo-Structs Project No. B1102 August 10, 2010
CLIENT: BHARAT PETROLEUM CORPORATION LTD. PROJECT: Geotechnical investigation for CCR project at Mahul, Mumbai
LOCATION:
CR
N
15 30 45 600.00
0.50 DS1 CH 58.59 15.2 28.92 2.68 0.27 9.6
1.00 SPT1 CH 54.37 14.1 26.50 2.70 >50 R
1.50 0.27 604 1.62
2.00 0.27 604 1.62
2.50 46 27 0.27 604 1.62
3.00
3.50
4.00 54 26
4.50
5.00
5.50 84 79
6.00
6.50
7.00 81 67
7.50
8.00
8.50 89 83
9.00 0.21 377 1.45
9.50 0.21 377 1.45
10.00 95 80 0.21 377 1.45
10.50
11.00
11.50 98 73
12.00 0.25 436 1.10
12.50 0.25 436 1.10
13.00 91 91 0.25 436 1.10
Water Table Depth: 3.20m Start Date: 30 5
End Date: 4 6
Co-ordinates:
Noble Geo-Structs
Ground R.L.: - Project No. Casing: 1.25m
APPENDIX A
UC
S,
kg
/cm
2
Po
rosit
y %
LL
, %
Log of Borings No. BH-1
Description Approximate Surface Elevation: Existing Surface
Elevation
Dep
th, m
Wa
ter
Co
nte
nt
/
Ab
so
rpti
on
%
Gra
ph
ic
Lo
g
G
2010
The insitu boundary layers shown are approximate. The actual limits may be more gradual. REMARKS: Rotary Drilling; NX Size Double Tube Core Barrel
Sam
ple
r
Typ
e
SL
, %
Cla
ssific
ation
φφ φφ, d
eg
ree
c, kg
/cm
2
RQ
DPI, %
B 1102
THE BOREHOLE IS TERMINATED AT DEPTH 13.00m BELOW G.L.
Brownish soil with murrum
Slightly weathered amygdaloidal basalt
grey
Fresh basalt grey I
II
R.L
. m
2010
Geotechnical Investigation at BPCL, Mahul Noble Geo-Structs Project No. B1102 August 10, 2010
CLIENT: BHARAT PETROLEUM CORPORATION LTD. PROJECT: Geotechnical investigation for CCR project at Mahul, Mumbai
LOCATION: 363 Tank
CR
N
15 30 45 600.00
0.50
1.00 DS1 CH 57.24 13.0 29.51 2.68 0.28 8.49
1.50 SPT1 CH 58.85 13.1 30.10 2.69 >50 R
2.00
2.50
3.00 Nil Nil
3.50
4.00
4.50 Nil Nil
5.00
5.50
6.00 Nil Nil
6.50
7.00
7.50 Nil Nil
8.00
8.50
9.00 Nil Nil
9.50 0.48 1015 1.04
10.00 0.48 1015 1.04
10.50 77 8
11.00 0.26 604 0.76
11.50 0.45 1056 0.70
12.00 87 59 0.45 1056 0.70
Water Table Depth: 1.75m Start Date: 19 5
End Date: 28 5
Co-ordinates:
Noble Geo-Structs
Ground R.L.: - Project No. Casing: 3.2 m
2010
2010
B 1102
Fresh basalt grey
THE BOREHOLE IS TERMINATED AT DEPTH 12.00m BELOW G.L.
The insitu boundary layers shown are approximate. The actual limits may be more gradual. REMARKS: Rotary Drilling; NX Size Double Tube Core Barrel
I
Soil with murrum
Completely weathered basalt, grey
LL
, %
SL
, %
Cla
ssific
atio
n
V
G
APPENDIX A
Log of Borings No. BH-02
Dep
th, m
R.L
. m
Gra
ph
ic
Lo
g Description Approximate Surface Elevation: Existing Surface
Elevation
Sam
ple
r
Typ
e
Wate
r
Co
nte
nt
/
Ab
so
rpti
on
%
UC
S,
kg
/cm
2
PI, %
Po
rosit
y %
RQ
D
c, k
g/c
m2
φφ φφ, d
eg
ree
Geotechnical Investigation at BPCL, Mahul Noble Geo-Structs Project No. B1102 August 10, 2010
CLIENT: BHARAT PETROLEUM CORPORATION LTD. PROJECT: Geotechnical investigation for CCR project at Mahul, Mumbai
LOCATION:
CR
N
15 30 45 600.00
0.50 DS1 CH 60.09 14.4 32.28 2.69 0.29 11.3
1.00 SPT1 CH 59.30 13.9 26.74 2.67 >50 R
1.50
2.00
2.50 73 44
3.00 0.24 627 1.16
3.50 0.24 627 1.16
4.00 65 46 0.24 627 1.16
4.50
5.00
5.50 77 47
6.00 0.28 754 1.09
6.50 0.28 754 1.09
7.00 97 66 0.28 754 1.09
7.50
8.00
8.50 89 33
9.00 0.28 604 0.76
9.50 0.28 604 0.76
10.00 97 81 0.28 604 0.76
Water Table Depth: 1.9m Start Date: 30 5
End Date: 3 6
Co-ordinates:
Noble Geo-Structs
Ground R.L.: - Project No. Casing: 1.0 m
THE BOREHOLE IS TERMINATED AT DEPTH 10.00m BELOW G.L.
Brownish soil with boulders
Fresh fractured basalt grey I
2010
2010
The insitu boundary layers shown are approximate. The actual limits may be more gradual. REMARKS: Rotary Drilling; NX Size Double Tube Core Barrel
B 1102
APPENDIX A
UC
S,
kg
/cm
2
Po
ros
ity
%
LL
, %
Log of Borings No. BH-3
Description Approximate Surface Elevation: Existing Surface
Elevation
De
pth
, m
Gra
ph
ic
Lo
g
G
R.L
. m
PI,
%
Sa
mp
ler
Ty
pe
SL
, %
Cla
ss
ific
atio
n
Wa
ter
Co
nte
nt
/ A
bs
orp
tio
n %
c,
kg
/cm
2
φφ φφ, d
eg
ree
RQ
D
Geotechnical Investigation at BPCL, Mahul Noble Geo-Structs Project No. B1102 August 10, 2010
CLIENT: BHARAT PETROLEUM CORPORATION LTD. PROJECT: Geotechnical investigation for CCR project at Mahul, Mumbai
LOCATION:
CR
N
15 30 45 600.00
0.50 DS1 CH 59.30 14.8 30.05 2.69 0.30 10.3
1.00 SPT1 CH 57.43 12.9 29.21 2.68 >50 R
1.50
2.00 Nil Nil
2.50
3.00
3.50 Nil Nil
4.00
4.50
5.00 Nil Nil
5.50
6.00
6.50 Nil Nil
7.00
7.50 Nil Nil
8.00 0.16 754 1.45
8.50 0.16 754 1.45
9.00 93 19 0.16 754 1.45
9.50 0.09 873 1.52
10.00 0.09 873 1.52
10.50 91 82 0.09 873 1.52
11.00 0.11 582 1.12
11.50 0.11 582 1.12
12.00 98 93 0.11 582 1.12
Water Table Depth: 1.55m Start Date: 24 5
End Date: 28 5
Co-ordinates:
Noble Geo-Structs
Ground R.L.: - Project No. Casing: 2.0 m
Completely weathered amygdaloidal
basalt grey
Fresh basalt grey I
V
Wate
r
Co
nte
nt
/
Ab
so
rpti
on
%
c, k
g/c
m2
φφ φφ, d
eg
ree
RQ
D
G
B 1102
THE BOREHOLE IS TERMINATED AT DEPTH 12.00m BELOW G.L.
2010
2010
The insitu boundary layers shown are approximate. The actual limits may be more gradual. REMARKS: Rotary Drilling; NX Size Double Tube Core Barrel
PI, %
Sam
ple
r
Typ
e
SL
, %
Cla
ssific
atio
n
R.L
. m
Brownish soil with murrum
APPENDIX A
UC
S,
kg
/cm
2
Po
rosit
y %
LL
, %
Log of Borings No. BH-4
Description Approximate Surface Elevation: Existing Surface
Elevation
Dep
th, m
Gra
ph
ic
Lo
g
Geotechnical Investigation at BPCL, Mahul Noble Geo-Structs Project No. B1102 August 10, 2010
CLIENT: BHARAT PETROLEUM CORPORATION LTD. PROJECT: Geotechnical investigation for CCR project at Mahul, Mumbai
LOCATION:
CR
N
15 30 45 600.00
0.50
1.00 DS1 CH 55.96 14.3 29.22 2.69 0.24 10.6
1.50 SPT1 CH 56.72 13.2 29.36 2.69 >50 R
2.00 0.34 905 0.71
2.50 0.34 905 0.71
3.00 43 28 0.34 905 0.71
3.50
4.00
4.50 41 29
5.00 0.23 1175 0.70
5.50 0.23 1175 0.70
6.00 43 38 0.23 1175 0.70
6.50 0.24 754 1.09
7.00 0.24 754 1.09
7.50 23 15 0.24 754 1.09
Water Table Depth: 1.6m Start Date: 11 5
End Date: 17 5
Co-ordinates:
Noble Geo-Structs
Ground R.L.: - Project No. Casing: 1.4 m
Highly weathered basalt, grey
THE BOREHOLE IS TERMINATED AT DEPTH 7.50m BELOW G.L.
The insitu boundary layers shown are approximate. The actual limits may be more gradual. REMARKS: Rotary Drilling; NX Size Double Tube Core Barrel
UC
S,
kg
/cm
2
2010
2010
B 1102
Yellowish brown soil mixed with
boulder
Slightly weathered basalt, grey
APPENDIX A
Log of Borings No. BH-05
De
pth
, m
R.L
. m
Gra
ph
ic
Lo
g
Description Approximate Surface Elevation: Existing Surface
Elevation
Sa
mp
ler
Ty
pe
Po
ros
ity
%
RQ
D Wa
ter
Co
nte
nt
/ A
bs
orp
tio
n %
SL
, %
PI,
%
c,
kg
/cm
2
φφ φφ, d
eg
ree
G
II
IVC
lassific
atio
n
LL
, %
Geotechnical Investigation at BPCL, Mahul Noble Geo-Structs Project No. B1102 August 10, 2010
CLIENT: BHARAT PETROLEUM CORPORATION LTD. PROJECT: Geotechnical investigation for CCR project at Mahul, Mumbai
LOCATION:
CR
N
15 30 45 600.00
0.50 DS1 SM NP NP NP 2.69 0.05 31.6
1.00
1.50 SPT1 CH 59.51 13.9 28.74 2.70 >50 R
2.00 0.61 604 1.66
2.50 0.61 604 1.66
3.00 58 27 0.61 604 1.66
3.50
4.00
4.50 61 48
5.00
5.50
6.00 65 21
6.50 0.27 754 1.06
7.00 0.27 754 1.06
7.50 93 61 0.27 754 1.06
8.00 1.01 905 0.93
8.50 1.01 905 0.93
9.00 94 88 1.01 905 0.93
Water Table Depth: 1.60m Start Date: 19 5
End Date: 22 5
Co-ordinates:
Noble Geo-Structs
Ground R.L.: - Project No. Casing: 1.5 m
APPENDIX A
UC
S,
kg
/cm
2
Po
ros
ity
%
LL
, %
Log of Borings No. BH-6
Description Approximate Surface Elevation: Existing Surface
Elevation
De
pth
, m
Wa
ter
Co
nte
nt
/
Ab
so
rpti
on
%
Gra
ph
ic
Lo
g
G
2010
The insitu boundary layers shown are approximate. The actual limits may be more gradual. REMARKS: Rotary Drilling; NX Size Double Tube Core Barrel
Sa
mp
ler
Ty
pe
SL
, %
Cla
ssific
atio
n
φφ φφ, d
eg
ree
c,
kg
/cm
2
RQ
DPI,
%
B 1102
THE BOREHOLE IS TERMINATED AT DEPTH 9.00m BELOW G.L.
Brownish soil with murrum
Slightly weathered amygdaloidal basalt
grey, brownII
IFresh amygdaloidal basalt grey, brown
R.L
. m
2010
Geotechnical Investigation at BPCL, Mahul Noble Geo-Structs Project No. B1102 August 10, 2010
CLIENT: BHARAT PETROLEUM CORPORATION LTD. PROJECT: Geotechnical investigation for CCR project at Mahul, Mumbai
LOCATION: 363 Tank
CR
N
15 30 45 600.00
0.30 DS1 CH 53.69 15.3 26.75 2.70 0.24 12.1
0.50 SPT1 CH 55.71 13.4 30.47 2.68 >50 R
1.00 0.16 604 1.47
1.50 0.16 604 1.47
2.00 75 39 0.16 604 1.47
2.50
3.00
3.50 93 79
4.00
4.50
5.00 97 73
5.50 0.08 754 1.09
6.00 0.08 754 1.09
6.50 96 74 0.08 754 1.09
7.00
7.50
8.00 86 86
8.50
9.00
9.50 90 52
10.00 0.29 604 1.10
10.50 0.29 604 1.10
11.00 99 78 0.29 604 1.10
Water Table Depth: 1.5m Start Date: 6 6
End Date: 16 6
Co-ordinates:
Noble Geo-Structs
Ground R.L.: - Project No. Casing: 0.5 mB 1102
THE BOREHOLE IS TERMINATED AT DEPTH 11.00m BELOW G.L.
The insitu boundary layers shown are approximate. The actual limits may be more gradual. REMARKS: Rotary Drilling; NX Size Double Tube Core Barrel
2010
2010
Wate
r
Co
nte
nt
/
Ab
so
rpti
on
%
UC
S,
kg
/cm
2
PI, % G
Brownish silty clay with gravel
Fresh fractured basalt with white
infillings greyI
LL
, %
SL
, %
c, k
g/c
m2
φφ φφ, d
eg
ree
APPENDIX A
Log of Borings No. BH-7
Dep
th, m
R.L
. m
Gra
ph
ic
Lo
g Description Approximate Surface Elevation: Existing Surface
Elevation
Sam
ple
r
Typ
e
Cla
ssific
ation
Po
rosit
y %
RQ
D
Geotechnical Investigation at BPCL, Mahul Noble Geo-Structs Project No. B1102 August 10, 2010
CLIENT: BHARAT PETROLEUM CORPORATION LTD. PROJECT: Geotechnical investigation for CCR project at Mahul, Mumbai
LOCATION: Aru pumphouse
CR
N
15 30 45 600.00
0.50
1.00 DS1 CH 45.47 16.3 21.93 2.69 0.12 20.6
1.50 SPT1 CH 49.03 13.5 21.22 2.69 >50 R 0.22 604 1.12
2.00 0.22 604 1.12
2.50 0.22 604 1.12
3.00 64 35
3.50
4.00
4.50 62 29
5.00
5.50
6.00 83 46 0.42 582 1.14
6.50 0.42 582 1.14
7.00 0.42 582 1.14
7.50 93 89 0.42 582 1.14
8.00
8.50
9.00 63 48 0.45 754 1.11
9.50 0.45 754 1.11
10.00 0.45 754 1.11
10.50 88 72 0.45 754 1.11
Water Table Depth: 2.7m Start Date: 2 5
End Date: 10 5
Co-ordinates:
Noble Geo-Structs
Ground R.L.: - Project No. Casing: 1.5 m
2010
2010
B 1102
FRESH AMYGDALOIDAL BASAT brown I
THE BOREHOLE IS TERMINATED AT DEPTH 10.50m BELOW G.L.
The insitu boundary layers shown are approximate. The actual limits may be more gradual. REMARKS: Rotary Drilling; NX Size Double Tube Core Barrel
soil with boulder
FRESH FRACTURED BASAT brown I
LL
, %
SL
, %
Sa
mp
ler
Ty
pe
Cla
ssific
ation
Wa
ter
Co
nte
nt
/
Ab
so
rpti
on
%
UC
S,
kg
/cm
2
PI,
% G
APPENDIX A
Log of Borings No. BH-08
Dep
th,
m
R.L
. m
Gra
ph
ic
Lo
g Description Approximate Surface Elevation: Existing Surface
Elevation
Po
ros
ity %
RQ
D
c,
kg
/cm
2
φφ φφ, d
eg
ree
Geotechnical Investigation at BPCL, Mahul Noble Geo-Structs Project No. B1102 August 10, 2010
CLIENT: BHARAT PETROLEUM CORPORATION LTD. PROJECT: Geotechnical investigation for CCR project at Mahul, Mumbai
LOCATION: 11 no Pump House
CR
N
15 30 45 600.00
0.40 DS1 CH 55.25 13.5 27.27 2.69 0.30 7.12
0.50 SPT1 CH 56.62 14.6 27.52 2.70 >50 R
1.00 0.19 733 1.09
1.50 0.19 733 1.09
2.00 51 22 0.19 733 1.09
2.50
3.00
3.50 65 9
4.00
4.50
5.00 81 28
5.50 0.28 1269 0.68
6.00 0.28 1269 0.68
6.50 80 75 0.28 1269 0.68
7.00
7.50
8.00 78 69
8.50
9.00
9.50 88 39
10.00 0.12 754 0.73
10.50 0.12 754 0.73
10.90 84 75 0.12 754 0.73
Water Table Depth: 1.9m Start Date: 20 5
End Date: 31 5
Co-ordinates:
Noble Geo-Structs
Ground R.L.: - Project No. Casing: m
Fresh amygdaloidal basalt with white
infillings, grey
THE BOREHOLE IS TERMINATED AT DEPTH 10.90m BELOW G.L.
The insitu boundary layers shown are approximate. The actual limits may be more gradual. REMARKS: Rotary Drilling; NX Size Double Tube Core Barrel
UC
S,
kg
/cm
2
2010
2010
B 1102
Soil with Boulder
Slightly weathered fractured basalt,
grey
APPENDIX A
Log of Borings No. BH-09
Dep
th, m
R.L
. m
Gra
ph
ic
Lo
g Description Approximate Surface Elevation: Existing Surface
Elevation
Sam
ple
r
Typ
e
Po
rosit
y %
RQ
D Wate
r
Co
nte
nt
/
Ab
so
rpti
on
%
SL
, %
PI, %
c, k
g/c
m2
φφ φφ, d
eg
ree
G
II
IC
lassific
atio
n
LL
, %
Geotechnical Investigation at BPCL, Mahul Noble Geo-Structs Project No. B1102 August 10, 2010
CLIENT: BHARAT PETROLEUM CORPORATION LTD. PROJECT: Geotechnical investigation for CCR project at Mahul, Mumbai
LOCATION: 18
CR
N
15 30 45 600.00
0.50
1.00 DS1
1.50 UDS1 CH 52.41 15.1 24.43 2.70 0.28 10.3
2.00
2.50
3.00 SPT1 CH 53.76 14.6 24.66 2.69 6 9 13 18 22
3.50
4.00
4.50 SPT2 >50 R
5.00
5.50
6.00 SPT3 >50 R
6.50
7.00
7.50 14 Nil
8.00 0.80 222 1.47
8.50 0.80 222 1.47
9.00 43 26 0.80 222 1.47
9.50
10.00
10.50 42 21
11.00 0.75 310 1.10
11.50 0.75 310 1.10
12.00 59 49 0.75 310 1.10
Filled up material
Yellowish silty clay
Sa
mp
ler
Ty
pe
Slightly weathered basalt grey II
Highly weathered fractured basalt grey IV
c,
kg
/cm
2
φφ φφ, d
eg
ree
APPENDIX A
Log of Borings No. BH-10
De
pth
, m
R.L
. m
Gra
ph
ic
Lo
g
Description Approximate Surface Elevation: Existing Surface
Elevation
Po
ros
ity
%
Cla
ssific
atio
n
LL
, %
SL
, %
G
PI,
%
RQ
D Wa
ter
Co
nte
nt
/
Ab
so
rpti
on
%
UC
S,
kg
/cm
2
Geotechnical Investigation at BPCL, Mahul Noble Geo-Structs Project No. B1102 August 10, 2010
CLIENT: BHARAT PETROLEUM CORPORATION LTD. PROJECT: Geotechnical investigation for CCR project at Mahul, Mumbai
LOCATION: 18
CR
N
15 30 45 60
Sa
mp
ler
Ty
pe
c,
kg
/cm
2
φφ φφ, d
eg
ree
APPENDIX A
Log of Borings No. BH-10
De
pth
, m
R.L
. m
Gra
ph
ic
Lo
g Description Approximate Surface Elevation: Existing Surface
Elevation
Po
ros
ity
%
Cla
ssific
atio
n
LL
, %
SL
, %
G
PI,
%
RQ
D Wa
ter
Co
nte
nt
/ A
bs
orp
tio
n %
UC
S,
kg
/cm
2
12.50
13.00
13.50 65 59
14.00 0.43 676 1.08
14.50 0.43 676 1.08
15.00 85 77 0.43 676 1.08
Water Table Depth: 7.10m Start Date: 16 5
End Date: 22 5
Co-ordinates:
Noble Geo-Structs
Ground R.L.: - Project No. Casing: 5.7 m
Fresh amygdaloidal basalt grey I
B 1102
THE BOREHOLE IS TERMINATED AT DEPTH 15.00m BELOW G.L.
The insitu boundary layers shown are approximate. The actual limits may be more gradual. REMARKS: Rotary Drilling; NX Size Double Tube Core Barrel
2010
2010
Geotechnical Investigation at BPCL, Mahul Noble Geo-Structs Project No. B1102 August 10, 2010
CLIENT: BHARAT PETROLEUM CORPORATION LTD. PROJECT: Geotechnical investigation for CCR project at Mahul, Mumbai
LOCATION: Open Plot Nala
CR
N
15 30 45 600.00
0.50
1.00
1.50 SPT1 >50 R
2.00
2.50
3.00 SPT2 >50 R
3.50
4.00
4.50 SPT3 >50 R
5.00
5.50
6.00 SPT4 >50 R
6.50 0.38 1015 1.08
7.00 0.38 1015 1.08
7.50 82 7 0.38 1015 1.08
8.00 0.15 1132 1.43
8.50 0.15 1132 1.43
9.00 85 64 0.15 1132 1.43
9.50
10.00
10.50 87 81
11.00 0.25 1056 1.06
11.50 0.25 1056 1.06
12.00 93 88 0.25 1056 1.06
Water Table Depth: 4.5m Start Date: 3 6
End Date: 21 6
Co-ordinates:
Noble Geo-Structs
Ground R.L.: - Project No. Casing: 5.5 m
2010
2010
B 1102
Fresh fractured basalt, grey I
THE BOREHOLE IS TERMINATED AT DEPTH 12.00m BELOW G.L.
The insitu boundary layers shown are approximate. The actual limits may be more gradual. REMARKS: Rotary Drilling; NX Size Double Tube Core Barrel
Filled up material
Completely weathered basalt, grey V
LL
, %
SL
, %
Sam
ple
r
Typ
e
Cla
ssific
atio
n
Wate
r
Co
nte
nt
/
Ab
so
rpti
on
%
UC
S,
kg
/cm
2
PI, % G
APPENDIX A
Log of Borings No. BH-11
Dep
th, m
R.L
. m
Gra
ph
ic
Lo
g Description Approximate Surface Elevation: Existing Surface
Elevation
Po
rosit
y %
RQ
D
c, k
g/c
m2
φφ φφ, d
eg
ree
Geotechnical Investigation at BPCL, Mahul Noble Geo-Structs Project No. B1102 August 10, 2010
CLIENT: BHARAT PETROLEUM CORPORATION LTD. PROJECT: Geotechnical investigation for CCR project at Mahul, Mumbai
LOCATION: Road 18 and 20
CR
N
15 30 45 600.00
0.50
1.00 DS1
1.50 UDS1 CH 68.10 12.6 35.05 2.70 0.33 6.27
2.00
2.50
3.00
3.50 SPT1 CH 58.14 13.6 28.69 2.69 >50 R
4.00 0.14 873 1.09
4.50 0.14 873 1.09
5.00 39 9 0.14 873 1.09
5.50 0.13 1132 1.06
6.00 0.13 1132 1.06
6.50 31 18 0.13 1132 1.06
7.00
7.50
8.00 31 27
8.50
9.00
9.50 67 65
10.00 90 40 0.17 727 1.10
Water Table Depth: 2.6m Start Date: 27 4
End Date: 3 5
Co-ordinates:
Noble Geo-Structs
Ground R.L.: - Project No. Casing: 3.5 m
FILL MATERIAL
SILTY CLAY brown
Sa
mp
ler
Ty
pe
2010
Moderately Weathered Fractured Basalt
grey III
c,
kg
/cm
2
φφ φφ, d
eg
ree
G
PI,
%
2010
B 1102
Fresh Fractured Basalt grey I
THE BOREHOLE IS TERMINATED AT DEPTH 10.00m BELOW G.L.
The insitu boundary layers shown are approximate. The actual limits may be more gradual. REMARKS: Rotary Drilling; NX Size Double Tube Core Barrel
APPENDIX A
Log of Borings No. BH-12
De
pth
, m
R.L
. m
Gra
ph
ic
Lo
g
Description Approximate Surface Elevation: Existing Surface
Elevation
Po
ros
ity
%
Cla
ssific
atio
n
LL
, %
SL
, %
RQ
D Wa
ter
Co
nte
nt
/
Ab
so
rpti
on
%
UC
S,
kg
/cm
2
Geotechnical Investigation at BPCL, Mahul Noble Geo-Structs Project No. B1102 August 10, 2010
CLIENT: BHARAT PETROLEUM CORPORATION LTD. PROJECT: Geotechnical investigation for CCR project at Mahul, Mumbai
LOCATION: Old Spare Yard
CR
N
15 30 45 600.00
0.50
1.00 DS1 CH 42.56 16.2 18.54 2.69 0.21 15.7
1.50 SPT1 CH 55.96 14.2 29.22 2.70 >50 R
2.00
2.50 25 Nil
3.00 0.65 1091 0.80
3.50 0.65 1091 0.80
4.00 41 Nil 0.65 1091 0.80
4.50 0.38 905 1.17
5.00 0.38 905 1.17
5.50 86 45 0.38 905 1.17
6.00
6.50 0.24 754 0.71
7.00 0.24 754 0.71
7.05 54 50 0.24 754 0.71
Water Table Depth: 1.9m Start Date: 6 5
End Date: 13 5
Co-ordinates:
Noble Geo-Structs
Ground R.L.: - Project No. Casing: 1.4 m
The insitu boundary layers shown are approximate. The actual limits may be more gradual. REMARKS: Rotary Drilling; NX Size Double Tube Core Barrel
2010
2010
B 1102
Slightly weathered basalt grey II
THE BOREHOLE IS TERMINATED AT DEPTH 7.05m BELOW G.L.
Wa
ter
Co
nte
nt
/ A
bs
orp
tio
n %
UC
S,
kg
/cm
2
Slightly weathered basalt grey II
c,
kg
/cm
2
φφ φφ, d
eg
ree
LL
, %
SL
, %
Sa
mp
ler
Ty
pe
Cla
ssif
ica
tio
n
Fresh basalt grey I
Fill Material
Highly weathered basalt grey IV
PI,
% G
APPENDIX A
Log of Borings No. BH-13
De
pth
, m
R.L
. m
Gra
ph
ic
Lo
g Description Approximate Surface Elevation: Existing Surface
Elevation
Po
ros
ity
%
RQ
D
Geotechnical Investigation at BPCL, Mahul Noble Geo-Structs Project No. B1102 August 10, 2010
CLIENT: BHARAT PETROLEUM CORPORATION LTD. PROJECT: Geotechnical investigation for CCR project at Mahul, Mumbai
LOCATION:
CR
N
15 30 45 600.00
0.50
1.00 DS1 CH 49.80 15.5 20.35 2.69
1.50 UDS CH 58.09 13.8 34.93 2.70 0.31 10.2
2.00
2.50
3.00 SPT1 CH 57.94 13.9 30.30 2.68 >50 R
3.50
4.00
4.50 SPT2 >50 R
5.00
5.50 12 Nil
6.00
6.50
7.00 13 Nil
7.50
8.00
8.50 7 Nil
9.00
9.50
10.00 13 Nil
10.50
11.00
11.50 0.37 1096 1.01
12.00 0.37 1096 1.01
12.10 96 68 0.37 1096 1.01
Water Table Depth: 5.2m Start Date: 7 5
End Date: 16 5
Co-ordinates:
Noble Geo-Structs
Ground R.L.: - Project No. Casing: 4.5 mB 1102
IV
The insitu boundary layers shown are approximate. The actual limits may be more gradual. REMARKS: Rotary Drilling; NX Size Double Tube Core Barrel
2010
2010
THE BOREHOLE IS TERMINATED AT DEPTH 12.10m BELOW G.L.
I
V
Filled up Material
Highly Weathered Basalt grey
Highly Weathered Basalt grey IV
Completely Weathered Basalt grey
Fresh basalt grey
Cla
ssific
ation
LL
, %
SL
, %
PI, % G
c, kg
/cm
2
RQ
D
φφ φφ, d
eg
ree
UC
S,
kg
/cm
2
Wate
r
Co
nte
nt
/
Ab
so
rpti
on
%
APPENDIX A
Log of Borings No. BH-14
Dep
th, m
R.L
. m
Gra
ph
ic
Lo
g Description Approximate Surface Elevation: Existing Surface
Elevation
Sam
ple
r
Typ
e
Po
rosit
y %
Geotechnical Investigation at BPCL, Mahul Noble Geo-Structs Project No. B1102 August 10, 2010
CLIENT: BHARAT PETROLEUM CORPORATION LTD. PROJECT: Geotechnical investigation for CCR project at Mahul, Mumbai
LOCATION: Road 18 and 20
CR
N
15 30 45 600.00
0.50
1.00 DS1
1.50 UDS CH 58.09 13.8 38.42 2.70 0.27 10.6
2.00
2.50
3.00
3.50 SPT1 CH 58.14 13.6 28.69 2.69 >50 R
4.00
4.50
5.00 29 13
5.50 0.24 627 1.126.00 0.24 627 1.126.50 61 41 0.24 627 1.127.00
7.50
8.00 54 39
8.50
9.00
9.50 39 14
10.00 0.13 1091 1.07
10.50 0.13 1091 1.07
11.00 0.13 1091 1.07
11.50 0.13 1091 1.07
12.00 57 53 0.13 1091 1.07
Water Table Depth: 3.4m Start Date: 29 4
End Date: 4 5
Co-ordinates:
Noble Geo-Structs
Ground R.L.: - Project No. Casing: 3.2 m
SLIGHTLY WEATHERED BASALT grey
brownII
FILL material
SILTY CLAY brown
Sam
ple
r
Typ
e
B 1102
THE BOREHOLE IS TERMINATED AT DEPTH 11.90m BELOW G.L.
The insitu boundary layers shown are approximate. The actual limits may be more gradual. REMARKS: Rotary Drilling; NX Size Double Tube Core Barrel
2010
2010
FRESH BASAT grey I
MODERATELY WEATHERED BASALT
brown III
c, k
g/c
m2
φφ φφ, d
eg
ree
APPENDIX A
Log of Borings No. BH-15
Dep
th, m
R.L
. m
Gra
ph
ic
Lo
g Description Approximate Surface Elevation: Existing Surface
Elevation
Po
rosit
y %
Cla
ssific
atio
n
LL
, %
SL
, %
G
PI, %
RQ
D Wate
r
Co
nte
nt
/
Ab
so
rpti
on
%
UC
S,
kg
/cm
2
Geotechnical Investigation at BPCL, Mahul Noble Geo-Structs Project No. B1102 August 10, 2010
CLIENT: BHARAT PETROLEUM CORPORATION LTD. PROJECT: Geotechnical investigation for CCR project at Mahul, Mumbai
LOCATION:
CR
N
15 30 45 600.00
0.50 DS1 CH 50.90 12.8 25.73 2.67 0.20 14.2
1.00
1.50 SPT1 CH 57.61 15 29.89 2.67 >50 R
2.00
2.50 SPT2 >50 R
3.00
3.50
4.00 15 Nil
4.50 0.31 453 1.88
5.00 0.31 453 1.88
5.50 55 31 0.31 453 1.88
6.00
6.50
7.00 85 73
7.50 0.26 940 1.19
8.00 0.26 940 1.19
8.50 82 75 0.26 940 1.19
9.00
9.50
10.00 89 79
10.50 0.23 627 1.35
11.00 0.23 627 1.35
11.50 83 79 0.23 627 1.35
12.00 78 78
Water Table Depth: 0.9m Start Date: 2 6
End Date: 9 6
Co-ordinates:
Noble Geo-Structs
Ground R.L.: - Project No. Casing: 2.5 mB 1102
THE BOREHOLE IS TERMINATED AT DEPTH 12.00m BELOW G.L.
The insitu boundary layers shown are approximate. The actual limits may be more gradual. REMARKS: Rotary Drilling; NX Size Double Tube Core Barrel
2010
2010
Slightly weathered basalt grey II
Fresh basalt grey
I
Fresh amygdaloidal basalt grey
Murrum
Highly weathered basalt grey IV
LL
, %
SL
, %
Sam
ple
r
Typ
e
Cla
ssific
atio
n
Wate
r
Co
nte
nt
/
Ab
so
rpti
on
%
UC
S,
kg
/cm
2
PI, % G
APPENDIX A
Log of Borings No. BH-16
Dep
th, m
R.L
. m
Gra
ph
ic
Lo
g Description Approximate Surface Elevation: Existing Surface
Elevation
Po
rosit
y %
RQ
D
c, k
g/c
m2
φφ φφ, d
eg
ree
Geotechnical Investigation at BPCL, Mahul Noble Geo-Structs Project No. B1102 August 10, 2010
CLIENT: BHARAT PETROLEUM CORPORATION LTD. PROJECT: Geotechnical investigation for CCR project at Mahul, Mumbai
LOCATION: RMP Control room
CR
N
15 30 45 600.00
0.50
1.00 DS CH 59.02 13.8 32.37 2.70
1.50 UDS1 SM NP NP NP NP 0.00 32.0
2.00
2.50
3.00
3.50 SPT1 SM NP NP NP NP >50 R
4.00
4.50
5.00 Nil Nil
5.50 0.41 590 1.446.00 0.41 590 1.446.50 74 55 0.41 590 1.447.00
7.50
8.00 77 60
8.50 0.27 480 1.489.00 0.27 480 1.489.50 95 66 0.27 480 1.4810.00
10.50
11.00 93 89
11.50 0.20 510 1.0912.00 0.20 510 1.0912.50 87 83 0.20 510 1.09
Water Table Depth: 2.5m Start Date: 19 6
End Date: 30 6
Co-ordinates:
Noble Geo-Structs
Ground R.L.: - Project No. Casing: 2.5 m
APPENDIX A
Log of Borings No. BH-017
Dep
th, m
R.L
. m
Gra
ph
ic
Lo
g Description Approximate Surface Elevation: Existing Surface
Elevation
Sam
ple
r
Typ
e
Cla
ssific
ation
Po
rosit
y %
RQ
D
Filled up material
Yellowish murrum
Completely weathered basalt, grey V
LL
, %
SL
, %
c, kg
/cm
2
φφ φφ, d
eg
ree
Wate
r
Co
nte
nt
/
Ab
so
rpti
on
%
UC
S,
kg
/cm
2
PI, % G
2010
B 1102
Fresh amygdaloidal basalt, grey
THE BOREHOLE IS TERMINATED AT DEPTH 12.50m BELOW G.L.
The insitu boundary layers shown are approximate. The actual limits may be more gradual. REMARKS: Rotary Drilling; NX Size Double Tube Core Barrel
2010
I
Geotechnical Investigation at BPCL, Mahul Noble Geo-Structs Project No. B1102 August 10, 2010
CLIENT: BHARAT PETROLEUM CORPORATION LTD. PROJECT: Geotechnical investigation for CCR project at Mahul, Mumbai
LOCATION: RMP Control Room
CR
N
15 30 45 600.00
0.50
1.00 DS1 CH 60.45 14.2 30.49 2.69
1.50 UDS1 SM NP NP NP NP 0.0 31.2
2.00
2.50
3.00 SPT1 SM NP NP NP NP >50 R
3.50
4.00
4.50
5.00
5.50 25 Nil
6.00 0.45 453 1.49
6.50 0.45 453 1.49
7.00 39 21 0.45 453 1.49
7.50
8.00
8.50 83 79
9.00 0.24 302 1.20
9.50 0.24 302 1.20
10.00 96 96 0.24 302 1.20
10.50 0.31 377 1.52
11.00 0.31 377 1.52
11.50 77 67 0.31 377 1.52
Water Table Depth: 2.50m Start Date: 9 7
End Date: 19 7
Co-ordinates:
Noble Geo-Structs
Ground R.L.: - Project No. Casing: 3.5 m
APPENDIX A
Log of Borings No. BH-18
Dep
th, m
R.L
. m
Gra
ph
ic
Lo
g Description Approximate Surface Elevation: Existing Surface
Elevation
Sam
ple
r
Typ
e
RQ
D
Po
rosit
y %
Wate
r
Co
nte
nt
/
Ab
so
rpti
on
%
UC
S,
kg
/cm
2
Filled up material
Yellowish murrum
c, k
g/c
m2
φφ φφ, d
eg
ree
Cla
ssific
ation
LL
, %
Fresh amygdaloidal basalt grey, red IS
L, %
G
PI, %
Moderately weathered basalt, grey III
B 1102
THE BOREHOLE IS TERMINATED AT DEPTH 11.50m BELOW G.L.
The insitu boundary layers shown are approximate. The actual limits may be more gradual. REMARKS: Rotary Drilling; NX Size Double Tube Core Barrel
2010
2010
Geotechnical Investigation at BPCL, Mahul Noble Geo-Structs Project No. B1102 August 10, 2010
CLIENT: BHARAT PETROLEUM CORPORATION LTD. PROJECT: Geotechnical investigation for CCR project at Mahul, Mumbai
LOCATION: Bituman
CR
N
15 30 45 600.00
0.50
1.00 DS1 CH 58.62 14.0 27.94 2.68 0.25 12.8
1.50 SPT1 CH 59.56 13.7 30.25 2.69 >50 R
2.00
2.50
3.00 SPT2 >50 R
3.50
4.00
4.50 SPT3 >50 R
5.00
5.50
6.00 18 Nil
6.50 0.36 604 1.54
7.00 0.36 604 1.54
7.50 72 59 0.36 604 1.54
8.00 0.23 528 1.03
8.50 0.23 528 1.03
9.00 83 75 0.23 528 1.03
Water Table Depth: 1.30m Start Date: 11 8
End Date: 19 8
Co-ordinates:
Noble Geo-Structs
Ground R.L.: - Project No. Casing: 4.5 m
Yellowish murrum
B 1102
THE BOREHOLE IS TERMINATED AT DEPTH 9.0m BELOW G.L.
The insitu boundary layers shown are approximate. The actual limits may be more gradual. REMARKS: Rotary Drilling; NX Size Double Tube Core Barrel
2010
2010
Highly weathered basalt, grey IV
IFresh amygdaloidal fractured basalt
grey
Wa
ter
Co
nte
nt
/
Ab
so
rpti
on
%
UC
S,
kg
/cm
2
Filled up material
c,
kg
/cm
2
φφ φφ, d
eg
ree
Cla
ssific
atio
n
LL
, %
SL
, %
G
PI,
%
APPENDIX A
Log of Borings No. BH-19
De
pth
, m
R.L
. m
Gra
ph
ic
Lo
g Description Approximate Surface Elevation: Existing Surface
Elevation
Sa
mp
ler
Ty
pe
RQ
D
Po
ros
ity
%
Geotechnical Investigation at BPCL, Mahul Noble Geo-Structs Project No. B1102 August 10, 2010
CLIENT: BHARAT PETROLEUM CORPORATION LTD. PROJECT: Geotechnical investigation for CCR project at Mahul, Mumbai
LOCATION: Cooling tower
CR
N
15 30 45 600.00
0.50
1.00 DS1 CH 56.57 13.7 28.03 2.67
1.50 UDS1 CH 57.59 13.0 30.50 2.70 0.26 11.5
2.00
2.50
3.00 SPT1 CH 59.83 15.1 28.72 2.68 >50 R
3.50
4.00
4.50
5.00 0.17 453 1.12
5.50 0.17 453 1.12
6.00 49 32 0.17 453 1.12
6.50
7.00
7.50 61 33
8.00 0.36 754 1.07
8.50 0.36 754 1.07
9.00 84 55 0.36 754 1.07
9.50
10.00
10.50 97 91
11.00 90 90 0.53 604 1.10
Water Table Depth: 3.50m Start Date: 1 7
End Date: 13 7
Co-ordinates:
Noble Geo-Structs
Ground R.L.: - Project No. Casing: 4.0 m
Filled up material
Yellowish soil with murrum
Sa
mp
ler
Ty
pe
2010
Slightly weathered amygdaloidal
fractured basalt greyII
c,
kg
/cm
2
φφ φφ,
de
gre
e
G
PI,
%
2010
B 1102
Fresh amygdaloidal fractured basalt
greyI
THE BOREHOLE IS TERMINATED AT DEPTH 11.00m BELOW G.L.
The insitu boundary layers shown are approximate. The actual limits may be more gradual. REMARKS: Rotary Drilling; NX Size Double Tube Core Barrel
APPENDIX A
Log of Borings No. BH-20
De
pth
, m
R.L
. m
Gra
ph
ic
Lo
g
Description Approximate Surface Elevation: Existing Surface
Elevation
Po
ros
ity
%
Cla
ssific
atio
n
LL
, %
SL
, %
RQ
D Wa
ter
Co
nte
nt
/
Ab
so
rpti
on
%
UC
S,
kg
/cm
2
Geotechnical Investigation at BPCL, Mahul Noble Geo-Structs Project No. B1102 August 10, 2010
CLIENT: BHARAT PETROLEUM CORPORATION LTD. PROJECT: Geotechnical investigation for CCR project at Mahul, Mumbai
LOCATION: TDU
CR
N
15 30 45 600.00
0.50
1.00 DS1 CH 60.95 14.8 31.16 2.69 0.29 9.27
1.50 SPT1 >50 R
2.00 0.14 453.00 1.49
2.50 0.14 453.00 1.49
3.00 39 34 0.14 453 1.49
3.50
4.00
4.50 53 21
5.00 0.20 377 1.50
5.50 0.20 377 1.50
6.00 84 75 0.20 377 1.50
6.50
7.00
7.50 96 94
8.00 0.26 377 1.14
8.50 0.26 377 1.14
9.00 98 77 0.26 377 1.14
Water Table Depth: 2.10m Start Date: 27 6
End Date: 19 7
Co-ordinates:
Noble Geo-Structs
Ground R.L.: - Project No. Casing: 2.5 m
Fresh fractured basalt grey
B 1102
THE BOREHOLE IS TERMINATED AT DEPTH 9.00m BELOW G.L.
The insitu boundary layers shown are approximate. The actual limits may be more gradual. REMARKS: Rotary Drilling; NX Size Double Tube Core Barrel
2010
2010
I
Moderately weathered basalt, grey
Slightly weathered fractured basalt, grey
III
II
Wate
r
Co
nte
nt
/
Ab
so
rpti
on
%
UC
S,
kg
/cm
2
Filled up material
c,
kg
/cm
2
φφ φφ, d
eg
ree
SL
, %
G
PI, %
RQ
D
APPENDIX A
Log of Borings No. BH-21
Dep
th, m
R.L
. m
Gra
ph
ic
Lo
g
Description Approximate Surface Elevation: Existing Surface
Elevation
Sam
ple
r
Typ
e
Po
rosit
y %
Cla
ssific
atio
n
LL
, %
Geotechnical Investigation at BPCL, Mahul Noble Geo-Structs Project No. B1102 August 10, 2010
CLIENT: BHARAT PETROLEUM CORPORATION LTD. PROJECT: Geotechnical investigation for CCR project at Mahul, Mumbai
LOCATION: TDU
CR
N
15 30 45 600.00
0.50
1.00 DS1 CH 58.25 14.3 27.01 2.68 0.24 13.1
1.50 SPT1 CH 57.79 14.0 30.19 2.69 >50 R
2.00
2.50 Nil Nil
3.00
3.50
4.00 23 Nil
4.50 0.38 754 1.45
5.00 0.38 754 1.45
5.50 40 14 0.38 754 1.45
6.00
6.50
7.00 57 9
7.50 0.17 604 1.47
8.00 0.17 604 1.47
8.50 94 51 0.17 604 1.47
9.00
9.50
10.00 99 94
10.50 0.31 754 1.08
11.00 0.31 754 1.08
11.50 98 57 0.31 754 1.08
Water Table Depth: 1.5m Start Date: 8 6
End Date: 21 6
Co-ordinates:
Noble Geo-Structs
Ground R.L.: - Project No. Casing: 1.8 mB 1102
Fresh basalt grey, black I
THE BOREHOLE IS TERMINATED AT DEPTH 11.50m BELOW G.L.
The insitu boundary layers shown are approximate. The actual limits may be more gradual. REMARKS: Rotary Drilling; NX Size Double Tube Core Barrel
Slightly weathered basalt grey II
2010
2010
RQ
DPI, %
Wate
r
Co
nte
nt
/
Ab
so
rpti
on
%
Highly weathered basalt grey IV
UC
S,
kg
/cm
2
Filled up material (with soil & boulders)
Brownish murrum
Completely weathered basalt grey V
c, k
g/c
m2
φφ φφ, d
eg
ree
SL
, %
G
APPENDIX A
Log of Borings No. BH-22
Dep
th, m
R.L
. m
Gra
ph
ic
Lo
g Description Approximate Surface Elevation: Existing Surface
Elevation
Sam
ple
r
Typ
e
Po
rosit
y %
Cla
ssific
ation
LL
, %
Geotechnical Investigation at BPCL, Mahul Noble Geo-Structs Project No. B1102 August 10, 2010
CLIENT: BHARAT PETROLEUM CORPORATION LTD. PROJECT: Geotechnical investigation for CCR project at Mahul, Mumbai
LOCATION: TDU
CR
N
15 30 45 600.00
0.50
1.00 DS
1.50 UDS1 CH 55.91 14.7 25.69 2.72 0.22 14.2
2.00
2.50
3.00 SPT1 CH 58.59 13.7 29.80 2.68 >50 R
3.50
4.00
4.50 SPT2 >50 R
5.00
5.50
6.00 SPT3 >50 R
6.50
7.00
7.50 SPT4 >50 R
8.00 0.31 1132 1.068.50 0.31 1132 1.069.00 49 21 0.31 1132 1.069.50
10.00
10.50 57 32
11.00 0.41 754 1.41
11.50 0.41 754 1.41
12.00 58 Nil 0.41 754 1.41
Wate
r
Co
nte
nt
/
Ab
so
rpti
on
%
UC
S,
kg
/cm
2
PI, % G
Filled up material
Yellowish hard loam
Slightly weathered fractured basalt, grey II
LL
, %
SL
, %
c, k
g/c
m2
φφ φφ, d
eg
ree
APPENDIX A
Log of Borings No. BH-23
Dep
th, m
R.L
. m
Gra
ph
ic
Lo
g Description Approximate Surface Elevation: Existing Surface
Elevation
Sam
ple
r
Typ
e
Cla
ssific
atio
n
Po
rosit
y %
RQ
D
Geotechnical Investigation at BPCL, Mahul Noble Geo-Structs Project No. B1102 August 10, 2010
CLIENT: BHARAT PETROLEUM CORPORATION LTD. PROJECT: Geotechnical investigation for CCR project at Mahul, Mumbai
LOCATION: TDU
CR
N
15 30 45 60
Wa
ter
Co
nte
nt
/ A
bs
orp
tio
n %
UC
S,
kg
/cm
2
PI,
% G
LL
, %
SL
, %
c,
kg
/cm
2
φφ φφ, d
eg
ree
APPENDIX A
Log of Borings No. BH-23
De
pth
, m
R.L
. m
Gra
ph
ic
Lo
g Description Approximate Surface Elevation: Existing Surface
Elevation
Sa
mp
ler
Ty
pe
Cla
ssific
atio
n
Po
ros
ity
%
RQ
D
12.50
13.00
13.50 85 76
14.00 0.11 905 1.06
14.50 0.11 905 1.06
15.00 95 79 0.11 905 1.06
15.50
16.00
16.50 94 91
17.00
17.50
18.00 91 91
Water Table Depth: 3.0m Start Date: 7 6
End Date: 24 6
Co-ordinates:
Noble Geo-Structs
Ground R.L.: - Project No. Casing: 5.0 m
2010
B 1102
Fresh amygdaloidal basalt, grey
THE BOREHOLE IS TERMINATED AT DEPTH 18.00m BELOW G.L.
The insitu boundary layers shown are approximate. The actual limits may be more gradual. REMARKS: Rotary Drilling; NX Size Double Tube Core Barrel
2010
I
Geotechnical Investigation at BPCL, Mahul Noble Geo-Structs Project No. B1102 August 10, 2010
CLIENT : BHARAT PETROLEUM CORPORATION LTD.
PROJECT : Geotechnical investigation for CCR project at Mahul, Mumbai
Gravel,
(%)
Sand,
(%)
Silt,
(%)
Clay,
(%)
L. L.,
(%)
P. L.,
(%)
S. L.,
(%)
P. I.,
(%)
1 1 SPT1 1.00 1.22 11.76 35.69 51.33 54.37 27.87 14.09 26.50 2.70 - -
2 1 DS1 0.50 2.41 14.73 33.77 49.10 58.59 29.67 15.16 28.92 2.68 - -
3 2 DS1 1.00 2.45 23.16 30.31 44.08 57.24 27.73 13.01 29.51 2.68 - -
4 2 SPT1 1.50 2.73 22.19 30.69 44.39 58.85 28.75 13.12 30.10 2.69 - -
5 3 SPT1 1.00 1.56 15.42 33.72 49.30 59.30 32.56 13.86 26.74 2.67 - -
6 3 DS1 0.50 0.44 14.50 34.77 50.29 60.09 27.81 14.43 32.28 2.69 - -
7 4 DS1 0.50 0.44 16.34 34.02 49.20 59.30 29.25 14.78 30.05 2.69 - -
8 4 SPT1 1.00 1.18 19.96 32.13 46.73 57.43 28.22 12.91 29.21 2.68 - -
9 5 DS1 1.00 3.06 27.66 28.33 40.96 55.96 26.74 14.25 29.22 2.69 - -
10 5 SPT1 1.50 1.85 21.82 31.21 45.13 56.72 27.36 13.24 29.36 2.69 - -
Specific
Gravity
Natural
Moisture
Content
(%)
Void
Ratio
Dry
Density
(g/cc)
Wet
Density
(g/cc)
Summary of Test results
Appendix A 2 Test Results
TypesSR.
No.
Boreh
ole
No.
Depth
(m)
Grain Size Analysis Atterberg's Limits
Geotechnical Investigation at BPCL, Mahul Noble Geo-Structs Project No. B1102 August 10, 2010
CLIENT : BHARAT PETROLEUM CORPORATION LTD.
PROJECT : Geotechnical investigation for CCR project at Mahul, Mumbai
Gravel,
(%)
Sand,
(%)
Silt,
(%)
Clay,
(%)
L. L.,
(%)
P. L.,
(%)
S. L.,
(%)
P. I.,
(%)
Specific
Gravity
Natural
Moisture
Content
(%)
Void
Ratio
Dry
Density
(g/cc)
Wet
Density
(g/cc)
Summary of Test results
TypesSR.
No.
Boreh
ole
No.
Depth
(m)
Grain Size Analysis Atterberg's Limits
11 6 SPT1 1.50 1.13 16.66 33.72 48.50 59.51 30.77 13.88 28.74 2.70 - -
12 6 DS1 0.50 9.14 62.84 11.46 16.57 NP NP NP NP 2.69 - -
13 7 SPT1 0.50 2.36 16.01 33.27 48.37 55.71 25.24 13.41 30.47 2.68 - -
14 7 DS1 0.30 0.46 15.76 34.36 49.43 53.69 26.94 15.29 26.75 2.70 - -
15 8 SPT1 1.50 2.39 27.18 28.79 41.64 49.03 27.81 13.45 21.22 2.69 - -
16 8 DS1 1.00 1.15 15.46 34.09 49.30 45.47 23.54 16.27 21.93 2.69 - -
17 9 DS1 0.40 2.95 25.47 29.26 42.32 55.25 27.98 13.49 27.27 2.69 - -
18 9 SPT1 0.50 1.63 25.83 29.75 42.79 56.62 29.10 14.57 27.52 2.70 - -
19 10 UDS1 1.50 2.00 18.35 32.66 46.99 52.41 27.98 15.09 24.43 2.70 20.55 1.58 1.90 0.71
20 10 SPT1 3.00 3.00 20.50 31.27 45.23 53.76 29.10 14.58 24.66 2.69 - -
Geotechnical Investigation at BPCL, Mahul Noble Geo-Structs Project No. B1102 August 10, 2010
CLIENT : BHARAT PETROLEUM CORPORATION LTD.
PROJECT : Geotechnical investigation for CCR project at Mahul, Mumbai
Gravel,
(%)
Sand,
(%)
Silt,
(%)
Clay,
(%)
L. L.,
(%)
P. L.,
(%)
S. L.,
(%)
P. I.,
(%)
Specific
Gravity
Natural
Moisture
Content
(%)
Void
Ratio
Dry
Density
(g/cc)
Wet
Density
(g/cc)
Summary of Test results
TypesSR.
No.
Boreh
ole
No.
Depth
(m)
Grain Size Analysis Atterberg's Limits
21 12 UDS1 1.50 1.60 25.04 30.08 43.28 68.10 33.05 12.56 35.05 2.70 21.11 1.57 1.90 0.72
22 12 SPT1 3.50 2.27 23.74 30.25 43.74 58.14 29.45 13.56 28.69 2.69 - -
23 13 SPT1 1.50 2.85 22.12 30.77 44.26 55.96 26.74 14.20 29.22 2.70 - -
24 13 DS1 1.00 11.86 52.81 14.45 20.89 42.56 24.02 16.20 18.54 2.69 - -
25 14 UDS1 1.50 2.15 19.39 32.18 46.29 58.09 23.16 13.78 34.93 2.70 16.91 1.58 1.85 0.71
26 14 DS1 1.00 6.63 55.55 15.46 22.36 49.80 29.45 15.52 20.35 2.69 - -
27 14 SPT 1 3.00 1.58 19.15 32.30 46.97 57.94 27.64 13.86 30.30 2.68 - -
28 15 UDS1 1.50 2.15 21.91 31.14 44.80 58.09 19.67 13.78 38.42 2.70 15.05 1.65 1.90 0.63
29 15 SPT1 3.50 0.44 13.38 35.23 50.96 58.14 29.45 13.56 28.69 2.69 - -
30 16 SPT1 1.50 1.41 12.97 34.78 50.85 57.61 27.72 15.04 29.89 2.67 - -
Geotechnical Investigation at BPCL, Mahul Noble Geo-Structs Project No. B1102 August 10, 2010
CLIENT : BHARAT PETROLEUM CORPORATION LTD.
PROJECT : Geotechnical investigation for CCR project at Mahul, Mumbai
Gravel,
(%)
Sand,
(%)
Silt,
(%)
Clay,
(%)
L. L.,
(%)
P. L.,
(%)
S. L.,
(%)
P. I.,
(%)
Specific
Gravity
Natural
Moisture
Content
(%)
Void
Ratio
Dry
Density
(g/cc)
Wet
Density
(g/cc)
Summary of Test results
TypesSR.
No.
Boreh
ole
No.
Depth
(m)
Grain Size Analysis Atterberg's Limits
31 16 DS1 1.00 2.10 16.43 33.09 48.38 50.90 25.17 12.84 25.73 2.67 - -
32 17 UDS1 1.50 17.50 44.30 15.57 22.63 NP NP NP NP 2.68 34.65 1.40 1.88 0.92
33 17 SPT1 3.50 16.00 45.71 15.60 22.69 NP NP NP NP 2.68 - -
34 17 DS1 1.00 2.50 23.21 30.47 43.83 59.02 26.65 13.75 32.37 2.70 - -
35 18 UDS1 1.50 15.00 39.30 18.62 27.08 NP NP NP NP 2.68 32.36 1.42 1.88 0.89
36 18 SPT1 3.00 17.50 39.71 17.38 25.41 NP NP NP NP 2.67 - -
37 18 DS1 1.00 0.39 19.01 32.95 47.65 60.45 29.96 14.21 30.49 2.69 - -
38 19 DS1 1.00 14.80 15.48 28.41 41.32 58.62 30.68 14.03 27.94 2.68 - -
39 19 SPT1 1.50 4.65 34.22 24.99 36.14 59.56 29.31 13.68 30.25 2.69 - -
40 20 UDS1 1.50 2.35 14.47 34.11 49.07 57.59 27.09 12.99 30.50 2.70 17.83 1.57 1.85 0.72
Geotechnical Investigation at BPCL, Mahul Noble Geo-Structs Project No. B1102 August 10, 2010
CLIENT : BHARAT PETROLEUM CORPORATION LTD.
PROJECT : Geotechnical investigation for CCR project at Mahul, Mumbai
Gravel,
(%)
Sand,
(%)
Silt,
(%)
Clay,
(%)
L. L.,
(%)
P. L.,
(%)
S. L.,
(%)
P. I.,
(%)
Specific
Gravity
Natural
Moisture
Content
(%)
Void
Ratio
Dry
Density
(g/cc)
Wet
Density
(g/cc)
Summary of Test results
TypesSR.
No.
Boreh
ole
No.
Depth
(m)
Grain Size Analysis Atterberg's Limits
41 20 SPT1 3.00 1.80 21.93 31.08 45.19 59.83 31.11 15.10 28.72 2.68 - -
42 20 DS1 1.00 2.94 17.38 32.36 47.31 56.57 28.54 13.67 28.03 2.67 - -
43 21 DS1 1.00 2.53 15.51 33.51 48.46 60.95 29.79 14.80 31.16 2.69 - -
44 22 SPT1 1.50 1.74 21.50 31.38 45.38 57.79 27.60 13.99 30.19 2.69 - -
45 22 DS1 1.00 1.24 16.37 33.57 48.82 58.25 31.24 14.27 27.01 2.68 - -
46 23 UDS1 1.50 0.40 18.69 33.39 47.53 55.91 30.22 14.70 25.69 2.72 27.25 1.50 1.91 0.81
47 23 SPT1 3.00 1.85 16.51 33.27 48.37 58.59 28.79 13.68 29.80 2.68 - -
Geotechnical Investigation at BPCL, Mahul Noble Geo-Structs Project No. B1102 August 10, 2010
CLIENT : BHARAT PETROLEUM CORPORATION LTD.
PROJECT : Geotechnical investigation for CCR project at Mahul, Mumbai
GRAIN SIZE ANALYSIS
BH. No. Depth, m Gravels % Sand % Silt % Clay % L.L.% P.L. % S.L. % P.I. % Sp.Gravity NMC % DD g/cc
BH-1/SPT1 1.00 1.22 11.76 35.69 51.33 54.37 27.87 14.09 26.50 2.70 - -
BH-1/DS1 0.50 2.41 14.73 33.77 49.10 58.59 29.67 15.16 28.92 2.68 - -
0
20
40
60
80
100
0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 100 sieve size,mm
pe
rce
nt
pa
ss
ing
,%
BH-1/SPT1
BH-1/DS1
CLAY SILT SAND GRAVEL
Geotechnical Investigation at BPCL, Mahul Noble Geo-Structs Project No. B1102 August 10, 2010
CLIENT : BHARAT PETROLEUM CORPORATION LTD.
PROJECT : Geotechnical investigation for CCR project at Mahul, Mumbai
GRAIN SIZE ANALYSIS
BH. No. Depth, m Gravels % Sand % Silt % Clay % L.L.% P.L. % S.L. % P.I. % Sp.Gravity NMC % DD g/cc
BH-2/DS1 1.00 2.45 23.16 30.31 44.08 57.24 27.73 13.01 29.51 2.68 - -
BH-2/SPT1 1.50 2.73 22.19 30.69 44.39 58.85 28.75 13.12 30.10 2.69 - -
0
20
40
60
80
100
0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 100 sieve size,mm
pe
rce
nt
pa
ss
ing
,%
BH-2/DS1
BH-2/SPT1
CLAY SILT SAND GRAVEL
Geotechnical Investigation at BPCL, Mahul Noble Geo-Structs Project No. B1102 August 10, 2010
CLIENT : BHARAT PETROLEUM CORPORATION LTD.
PROJECT : Geotechnical investigation for CCR project at Mahul, Mumbai
GRAIN SIZE ANALYSIS
BH. No. Depth, m Gravels % Sand % Silt % Clay % L.L.% P.L. % S.L. % P.I. % Sp.Gravity NMC % DD g/cc
BH-3/SPT1 1.00 1.56 15.42 33.72 49.30 59.30 32.56 13.86 26.74 2.67 - -
BH-3/DS1 0.50 0.44 14.50 34.77 50.29 60.09 27.81 14.43 32.28 2.69 - -
0
20
40
60
80
100
0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 100 sieve size,mm
pe
rce
nt
pa
ss
ing
,%
BH-3/SPT1
BH-3/DS1
CLAY SILT SAND GRAVEL
Geotechnical Investigation at BPCL, Mahul Noble Geo-Structs Project No. B1102 August 10, 2010
CLIENT : BHARAT PETROLEUM CORPORATION LTD.
PROJECT : Geotechnical investigation for CCR project at Mahul, Mumbai
GRAIN SIZE ANALYSIS
BH. No. Depth, m Gravels % Sand % Silt % Clay % L.L.% P.L. % S.L. % P.I. % Sp.Gravity NMC % DD g/cc
BH-4/DS1 0.50 0.44 16.34 34.02 49.20 59.30 29.25 14.78 30.05 2.69 - -
BH-4/SPT1 1.00 1.18 19.96 32.13 46.73 57.43 28.22 12.91 29.21 2.68 - -
0
20
40
60
80
100
0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 100 sieve size,mm
pe
rce
nt
pa
ss
ing
,%
BH-4/DS1
BH-4/SPT1
CLAY SILT SAND GRAVEL
Geotechnical Investigation at BPCL, Mahul Noble Geo-Structs Project No. B1102 August 10, 2010
CLIENT : BHARAT PETROLEUM CORPORATION LTD.
PROJECT : Geotechnical investigation for CCR project at Mahul, Mumbai
GRAIN SIZE ANALYSIS
BH. No. Depth, m Gravels % Sand % Silt % Clay % L.L.% P.L. % S.L. % P.I. % Sp.Gravity NMC % DD g/cc
BH-5/DS1 1.00 3.06 27.66 28.33 40.96 55.96 26.74 14.25 29.22 2.69 - -
BH-5/SPT1 1.50 1.85 21.82 31.21 45.13 56.72 27.36 13.24 29.36 2.69 - -
0
20
40
60
80
100
0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 100 sieve size,mm
pe
rce
nt
pa
ss
ing
,%
BH-5/DS1
BH-5/SPT1
CLAY SILT SAND GRAVEL
Geotechnical Investigation at BPCL, Mahul Noble Geo-Structs Project No. B1102 August 10, 2010
CLIENT : BHARAT PETROLEUM CORPORATION LTD.
PROJECT : Geotechnical investigation for CCR project at Mahul, Mumbai
GRAIN SIZE ANALYSIS
BH. No. Depth, m Gravels % Sand % Silt % Clay % L.L.% P.L. % S.L. % P.I. % Sp.Gravity NMC % DD g/cc
BH-6/SPT1 1.50 1.13 16.66 33.72 48.50 59.51 30.77 13.88 28.74 2.70 - -
BH-6/DS1 0.50 9.14 62.84 11.46 16.57 NP NP NP NP 2.69 - -
0
20
40
60
80
100
0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 100 sieve size,mm
pe
rce
nt
pa
ss
ing
,%
BH-6/SPT1
BH-6/DS1
CLAY SILT SAND GRAVEL
Geotechnical Investigation at BPCL, Mahul Noble Geo-Structs Project No. B1102 August 10, 2010
CLIENT : BHARAT PETROLEUM CORPORATION LTD.
PROJECT : Geotechnical investigation for CCR project at Mahul, Mumbai
GRAIN SIZE ANALYSIS
BH. No. Depth, m Gravels % Sand % Silt % Clay % L.L.% P.L. % S.L. % P.I. % Sp.Gravity NMC % DD g/cc
BH-7/SPT1 0.50 2.36 16.01 33.27 48.37 55.71 25.24 13.41 30.47 2.68 - -
BH-7/DS1 0.30 0.46 15.76 34.36 49.43 53.69 26.94 15.29 26.75 2.70 - -
0
20
40
60
80
100
0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 100 sieve size,mm
pe
rce
nt
pa
ss
ing
,%
BH-7/SPT1
BH-7/DS1
CLAY SILT SAND GRAVEL
Geotechnical Investigation at BPCL, Mahul Noble Geo-Structs Project No. B1102 August 10, 2010
CLIENT : BHARAT PETROLEUM CORPORATION LTD.
PROJECT : Geotechnical investigation for CCR project at Mahul, Mumbai
GRAIN SIZE ANALYSIS
BH. No. Depth, m Gravels % Sand % Silt % Clay % L.L.% P.L. % S.L. % P.I. % Sp.Gravity NMC % DD g/cc
BH-8/SPT1 1.50 2.39 27.18 28.79 41.64 49.03 27.81 13.45 21.22 2.69 - -
BH-8/DS1 1.00 1.15 15.46 34.09 49.30 45.47 23.54 16.27 21.93 2.69 - -
0
20
40
60
80
100
0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 100 sieve size,mm
pe
rce
nt
pa
ss
ing
,%
BH-8/SPT1
BH-8/DS1
CLAY SILT SAND GRAVEL
Geotechnical Investigation at BPCL, Mahul Noble Geo-Structs Project No. B1102 August 10, 2010
CLIENT : BHARAT PETROLEUM CORPORATION LTD.
PROJECT : Geotechnical investigation for CCR project at Mahul, Mumbai
GRAIN SIZE ANALYSIS
BH. No. Depth, m Gravels % Sand % Silt % Clay % L.L.% P.L. % S.L. % P.I. % Sp.Gravity NMC % DD g/cc
BH-9/DS1 0.40 2.95 25.47 29.26 42.32 55.25 27.98 13.49 27.27 2.69 - -
BH-9/SPT1 0.50 1.63 25.83 29.75 42.79 56.62 29.10 14.57 27.52 2.70 - -
0
20
40
60
80
100
0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 100 sieve size,mm
pe
rce
nt
pa
ss
ing
,%
BH-9/DS1
BH-9/SPT1
CLAY SILT SAND GRAVEL
Geotechnical Investigation at BPCL, Mahul Noble Geo-Structs Project No. B1102 August 10, 2010
CLIENT : BHARAT PETROLEUM CORPORATION LTD.
PROJECT : Geotechnical investigation for CCR project at Mahul, Mumbai
GRAIN SIZE ANALYSIS
BH. No. Depth, m Gravels % Sand % Silt % Clay % L.L.% P.L. % S.L. % P.I. % Sp.Gravity NMC % DD g/cc
BH-10/UDS1 1.50 2.00 18.35 32.66 46.99 52.41 27.98 15.09 24.43 2.70 20.55 1.58
BH-10/SPT1 3.00 3.00 20.50 31.27 45.23 53.76 29.10 14.58 24.66 2.69 - -
0
20
40
60
80
100
0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 100 sieve size,mm
pe
rce
nt
pa
ss
ing
,%
BH-10/UDS1
BH-10/SPT1
CLAY SILT SAND GRAVEL
Geotechnical Investigation at BPCL, Mahul Noble Geo-Structs Project No. B1102 August 10, 2010
CLIENT : BHARAT PETROLEUM CORPORATION LTD.
PROJECT : Geotechnical investigation for CCR project at Mahul, Mumbai
GRAIN SIZE ANALYSIS
BH. No. Depth, m Gravels % Sand % Silt % Clay % L.L.% P.L. % S.L. % P.I. % Sp.Gravity NMC % DD g/cc
BH-12/UDS1 1.50 1.60 25.04 30.08 43.28 68.10 33.05 12.56 35.05 2.70 21.11 1.57
BH-12/SPT1 3.50 2.27 23.74 30.25 43.74 58.14 29.45 13.56 28.69 2.69 - -
0
20
40
60
80
100
0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 100 sieve size,mm
pe
rce
nt
pa
ss
ing
,%
BH-12/UDS1
BH-12/SPT1
CLAY SILT SAND GRAVEL
Geotechnical Investigation at BPCL, Mahul Noble Geo-Structs Project No. B1102 August 10, 2010
CLIENT : BHARAT PETROLEUM CORPORATION LTD.
PROJECT : Geotechnical investigation for CCR project at Mahul, Mumbai
GRAIN SIZE ANALYSIS
BH. No. Depth, m Gravels % Sand % Silt % Clay % L.L.% P.L. % S.L. % P.I. % Sp.Gravity NMC % DD g/cc
BH-13/SPT1 1.50 2.85 22.12 30.77 44.26 55.96 26.74 14.20 29.22 2.70 - -
BH-13/DS1 1.00 11.86 52.81 14.45 20.89 42.56 24.02 16.20 18.54 2.69 - -
0
20
40
60
80
100
0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 100 sieve size,mm
pe
rce
nt
pa
ss
ing
,%
BH-13/SPT1
BH-13/DS1
CLAY SILT SAND GRAVEL
Geotechnical Investigation at BPCL, Mahul Noble Geo-Structs Project No. B1102 August 10, 2010
CLIENT : BHARAT PETROLEUM CORPORATION LTD.
PROJECT : Geotechnical investigation for CCR project at Mahul, Mumbai
GRAIN SIZE ANALYSIS
BH. No. Depth, m Gravels % Sand % Silt % Clay % L.L.% P.L. % S.L. % P.I. % Sp.Gravity NMC % DD g/cc
BH-14/UDS1 1.50 2.15 19.39 32.18 46.29 58.09 23.16 13.78 34.93 2.70 16.91 1.58
BH-14/DS1 1.00 6.63 55.55 15.46 22.36 49.80 29.45 15.52 20.35 2.69 - -
BH-14/SPT1 3.00 1.58 19.15 32.30 46.97 57.94 27.64 13.86 30.30 2.68 - -
0
20
40
60
80
100
0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 100 sieve size,mm
pe
rce
nt
pas
sin
g,%
BH-14/UDS1
BH-14/DS1
BH-14/SPT1
CLAY SILT SAND GRAVEL
Geotechnical Investigation at BPCL, Mahul Noble Geo-Structs Project No. B1102 August 10, 2010
CLIENT : BHARAT PETROLEUM CORPORATION LTD.
PROJECT : Geotechnical investigation for CCR project at Mahul, Mumbai
GRAIN SIZE ANALYSIS
BH. No. Depth, m Gravels % Sand % Silt % Clay % L.L.% P.L. % S.L. % P.I. % Sp.Gravity NMC % DD g/cc
BH-15/UDS1 1.50 2.15 21.91 31.14 44.80 58.09 19.67 13.78 38.42 2.70 15.05 1.65
BH-15/SPT1 3.50 0.44 13.38 35.23 50.96 58.14 29.45 13.56 28.69 2.69 - -
0
20
40
60
80
100
0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 100 sieve size,mm
pe
rce
nt
pa
ss
ing
,%
BH-15/UDS1
BH-15/SPT1
CLAY SILT SAND GRAVEL
Geotechnical Investigation at BPCL, Mahul Noble Geo-Structs Project No. B1102 August 10, 2010
CLIENT : BHARAT PETROLEUM CORPORATION LTD.
PROJECT : Geotechnical investigation for CCR project at Mahul, Mumbai
GRAIN SIZE ANALYSIS
BH. No. Depth, m Gravels % Sand % Silt % Clay % L.L.% P.L. % S.L. % P.I. % Sp.Gravity NMC % DD g/cc
BH-16/SPT1 1.50 1.41 12.97 34.78 50.85 57.61 27.72 15.04 29.89 2.67 - -
BH-16/DS1 1.00 2.10 16.43 33.09 48.38 50.90 25.17 12.84 25.73 2.67 - -
0
20
40
60
80
100
0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 100 sieve size,mm
pe
rce
nt
pa
ss
ing
,%
BH-16/SPT1
BH-16/DS1
CLAY SILT SAND GRAVEL
Geotechnical Investigation at BPCL, Mahul Noble Geo-Structs Project No. B1102 August 10, 2010
CLIENT : BHARAT PETROLEUM CORPORATION LTD.
PROJECT : Geotechnical investigation for CCR project at Mahul, Mumbai
GRAIN SIZE ANALYSIS
BH. No. Depth, m Gravels % Sand % Silt % Clay % L.L.% P.L. % S.L. % P.I. % Sp.Gravity NMC % DD g/cc
BH-17/UDS1 1.50 17.50 44.30 15.57 22.63 NP NP NP NP 2.68 34.65 1.40
BH-17/SPT1 3.50 16.00 45.71 15.60 22.69 NP NP NP NP 2.68 - -
BH-17/DS1 1.00 2.50 23.21 30.47 43.83 59.02 26.65 13.75 32.37 2.70 - -
0
20
40
60
80
100
0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 100 sieve size,mm
pe
rce
nt
pas
sin
g,%
BH-17/UDS1
BH-17/SPT1
BH-17/DS1
CLAY SILT SAND GRAVEL
Geotechnical Investigation at BPCL, Mahul Noble Geo-Structs Project No. B1102 August 10, 2010
CLIENT : BHARAT PETROLEUM CORPORATION LTD.
PROJECT : Geotechnical investigation for CCR project at Mahul, Mumbai
GRAIN SIZE ANALYSIS
BH. No. Depth, m Gravels % Sand % Silt % Clay % L.L.% P.L. % S.L. % P.I. % Sp.Gravity NMC % DD g/cc
BH-18/UDS1 1.50 15.00 39.30 18.62 27.08 NP NP NP NP 2.68 32.36 1.42
BH-18/SPT1 3.00 17.50 39.71 17.38 25.41 NP NP NP NP 2.67 - -
BH-18/DS1 1.00 0.39 19.01 32.95 47.65 60.45 29.96 14.21 30.49 2.69 - -
0
20
40
60
80
100
0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 100 sieve size,mm
pe
rce
nt
pas
sin
g,%
BH-18/UDS1
BH-18/SPT1
BH-18/DS1
CLAY SILT SAND GRAVEL
Geotechnical Investigation at BPCL, Mahul Noble Geo-Structs Project No. B1102 August 10, 2010
CLIENT : BHARAT PETROLEUM CORPORATION LTD.
PROJECT : Geotechnical investigation for CCR project at Mahul, Mumbai
GRAIN SIZE ANALYSIS
BH. No. Depth, m Gravels % Sand % Silt % Clay % L.L.% P.L. % S.L. % P.I. % Sp.Gravity NMC % DD g/cc
BH-19/DS1 1.00 14.80 15.48 28.41 41.32 58.62 30.68 14.03 27.94 2.68 - -
BH-19/SPT1 1.50 4.65 34.22 24.99 36.14 59.56 29.31 13.68 30.25 2.69 - -
0
20
40
60
80
100
0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 100 sieve size,mm
pe
rce
nt
pa
ss
ing
,%
BH-19/DS1
BH-19/SPT1
CLAY SILT SAND GRAVEL
Geotechnical Investigation at BPCL, Mahul Noble Geo-Structs Project No. B1102 August 10, 2010
CLIENT : BHARAT PETROLEUM CORPORATION LTD.
PROJECT : Geotechnical investigation for CCR project at Mahul, Mumbai
GRAIN SIZE ANALYSIS
BH. No. Depth, m Gravels % Sand % Silt % Clay % L.L.% P.L. % S.L. % P.I. % Sp.Gravity NMC % DD g/cc
BH-20/UDS1 1.50 2.35 14.47 34.11 49.07 57.59 27.09 12.99 30.50 2.70 17.83 1.57
BH-20/SPT1 3.00 1.80 21.93 31.08 45.19 59.83 31.11 15.10 28.72 2.68 - -
BH-20/DS1 1.00 2.94 17.38 32.36 47.31 56.57 28.54 13.67 28.03 2.67 - -
0
20
40
60
80
100
0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 100 sieve size,mm
pe
rce
nt
pas
sin
g,%
BH-20/UDS1
BH-20/SPT1
BH-20/DS1
CLAY SILT SAND GRAVEL
Geotechnical Investigation at BPCL, Mahul Noble Geo-Structs Project No. B1102 August 10, 2010
CLIENT : BHARAT PETROLEUM CORPORATION LTD.
PROJECT : Geotechnical investigation for CCR project at Mahul, Mumbai
GRAIN SIZE ANALYSIS
BH. No. Depth, m Gravels % Sand % Silt % Clay % L.L.% P.L. % S.L. % P.I. % Sp.Gravity NMC % DD g/cc
BH-21/DS1 1.00 2.53 15.51 33.51 48.46 60.95 29.79 14.80 31.16 2.69 - -
0
20
40
60
80
100
0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 100 sieve size,mm
pe
rce
nt
pas
sin
g,%
BH-21/DS1
CLAY SILT SAND GRAVEL
Geotechnical Investigation at BPCL, Mahul Noble Geo-Structs Project No. B1102 August 10, 2010
CLIENT : BHARAT PETROLEUM CORPORATION LTD.
PROJECT : Geotechnical investigation for CCR project at Mahul, Mumbai
GRAIN SIZE ANALYSIS
BH. No. Depth, m Gravels % Sand % Silt % Clay % L.L.% P.L. % S.L. % P.I. % Sp.Gravity NMC % DD g/cc
BH-22/SPT1 1.50 1.74 21.50 31.38 45.38 57.79 27.60 13.99 30.19 2.69 - -
BH-22/DS1 1.00 1.24 16.37 33.57 48.82 58.25 31.24 14.27 27.01 2.68 - -
0
20
40
60
80
100
0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 100 sieve size,mm
pe
rce
nt
pa
ss
ing
,%
BH-22/SPT1
BH-22/DS1
CLAY SILT SAND GRAVEL
Geotechnical Investigation at BPCL, Mahul Noble Geo-Structs Project No. B1102 August 10, 2010
CLIENT : BHARAT PETROLEUM CORPORATION LTD.
PROJECT : Geotechnical investigation for CCR project at Mahul, Mumbai
GRAIN SIZE ANALYSIS
BH. No. Depth, m Gravels % Sand % Silt % Clay % L.L.% P.L. % S.L. % P.I. % Sp.Gravity NMC % DD g/cc
BH-23/UDS1 1.50 0.40 18.69 33.39 47.53 55.91 30.22 14.70 25.69 2.72 27.25 1.50
BH-23/SPT1 3.00 1.85 16.51 33.27 48.37 58.59 28.79 13.68 29.80 2.68 - -
0
20
40
60
80
100
0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 100 sieve size,mm
pe
rce
nt
pa
ss
ing
,%
BH-23/UDS1
BH-23/SPT1
CLAY SILT SAND GRAVEL
Geotechnical Investigation at BPCL, Mahul Noble Geo-Structs Project No. B1102 August 10, 2010
Client : BHARAT PETROLEUM CORPORATION LTD.
Project : Geotechnical investigation for CCR project at Mahul, Mumbai
Sr.
No.
BH
No.
Piece
No.
Depth
(m)
Density
(g/cc)
Water
Absorption
(%)
Specific
Gravity
Porosity
(%)
UCS
(kg/cm2)
Point load
Index
kg/cm2
1 1 15 1.00 to 2.50 2.65 0.27 2.69 1.62 604
2 1 42 8.50 to 10.00 2.71 0.21 2.75 1.45 377
3 1 64 11.50 to 13.50 2.55 0.25 2.58 1.10 436 20
4 2 5 9.00 to 10.50 2.85 0.48 2.88 1.04 1015
5 2 27 10.50 to 12.00 2.62 0.26 2.64 0.76 604 27
6 2 33 10.50 to 12.00 2.83 0.45 2.85 0.70 1056
7 3 13 2.50 to 4.00 2.61 0.24 2.64 1.16 627
8 3 36 5.50 to 7.00 2.85 0.28 2.88 1.09 754
9 3 72 8.50 to 10.00 2.87 0.28 2.89 0.76 604 27
10 4 27 7.50 to 9.00 2.72 0.16 2.76 1.45 754
11 4 32 9.00 to 10.50 2.87 0.09 2.91 1.52 873 40
12 4 43 10.50 to 12.00 2.64 0.11 2.67 1.12 582
13 5 5 1.50 to 3.00 2.80 0.34 2.82 0.71 905
14 5 13 4.50 to 6.00 2.85 0.23 2.87 0.70 1175 53
15 5 19 6.00 to 7.50 2.73 0.24 2.76 1.09 754
ROCK PROPERTIES
Geotechnical Investigation at BPCL, Mahul Noble Geo-Structs Project No. B1102 August 10, 2010
Client : BHARAT PETROLEUM CORPORATION LTD.
Project : Geotechnical investigation for CCR project at Mahul, Mumbai
Sr.
No.
BH
No.
Piece
No.
Depth
(m)
Density
(g/cc)
Water
Absorption
(%)
Specific
Gravity
Porosity
(%)
UCS
(kg/cm2)
Point load
Index
kg/cm2
ROCK PROPERTIES
16 6 9 1.50 to 3.00 2.51 0.61 2.55 1.66 604
17 6 35 6.00 to 7.50 2.80 0.27 2.83 1.06 754
18 6 45 7.50 to 9.00 2.66 1.01 2.69 0.93 905 41
19 7 10 0.50 to 2.00 2.69 0.16 2.73 1.47 604
20 7 45 5.00 to 6.50 2.71 0.08 2.74 1.09 754
21 7 75 9.50 to 11.00 2.70 0.29 2.73 1.10 604 27
22 8 8 1.50 to 3.00 2.65 0.22 2.68 1.12 604
23 8 42 6.00 to 7.50 2.60 0.42 2.63 1.14 582 26
24 8 57 9.00 to 10.50 2.68 0.45 2.71 1.11 754
25 9 10 0.50 to 2.00 2.72 0.19 2.75 1.09 733
26 9 47 5.00 to 6.50 2.90 0.28 2.92 0.68 1269 58
27 9 79 9.50 to 10.90 2.73 0.12 2.75 0.73 754
28 10 7 7.50 to 9.00 2.68 0.80 2.72 1.47 222
29 10 22 10.50 to 12.00 2.70 0.75 2.73 1.10 310
30 10 39 13.50 to 15.00 2.75 0.43 2.78 1.08 676 31
Geotechnical Investigation at BPCL, Mahul Noble Geo-Structs Project No. B1102 August 10, 2010
Client : BHARAT PETROLEUM CORPORATION LTD.
Project : Geotechnical investigation for CCR project at Mahul, Mumbai
Sr.
No.
BH
No.
Piece
No.
Depth
(m)
Density
(g/cc)
Water
Absorption
(%)
Specific
Gravity
Porosity
(%)
UCS
(kg/cm2)
Point load
Index
kg/cm2
ROCK PROPERTIES
31 11 17 6.00 to 7.50 2.75 0.38 2.78 1.08 1015
32 11 27 7.50 to 9.00 2.76 0.15 2.8 1.43 1132
33 11 40 10.50 to 12.00 2.80 0.25 2.83 1.06 1056 48
34 12 8 3.50 to 5.90 2.73 0.14 2.76 1.09 873
35 12 17 5.00 to 6.50 2.80 0.13 2.83 1.06 1132 51
36 12 33 9.50 to 10.00 2.69 0.17 2.72 1.10 727
37 13 23 3.05 to 4.55 2.85 0.65 2.87 0.80 1091
38 13 36 4.55 to 6.05 2.73 0.38 2.76 1.17 905 41
39 13 41 6.05 to 7.05 2.81 0.24 2.83 0.71 754
40 14 24 11.50 to 12.10 2.83 0.37 2.86 1.01 1096 50
41 14 25 11.50 to 12.10 2.67 0.23 2.69 0.87 754
42 15 11 4.90 to 6.40 2.66 0.24 2.69 1.12 627
43 15 30 9.40 to 11.90 2.76 0.14 2.79 1.08 905 41
44 15 36 9.40 to 11.90 2.78 0.13 2.81 1.07 1091
45 16 13 4.00 to 5.50 2.63 0.31 2.68 1.88 453
Geotechnical Investigation at BPCL, Mahul Noble Geo-Structs Project No. B1102 August 10, 2010
Client : BHARAT PETROLEUM CORPORATION LTD.
Project : Geotechnical investigation for CCR project at Mahul, Mumbai
Sr.
No.
BH
No.
Piece
No.
Depth
(m)
Density
(g/cc)
Water
Absorption
(%)
Specific
Gravity
Porosity
(%)
UCS
(kg/cm2)
Point load
Index
kg/cm2
ROCK PROPERTIES
46 16 29 7.00 to 8.50 2.80 0.26 2.83 1.19 940
47 16 44 10.00 to 11.50 2.70 0.23 2.74 1.35 627 28
48 17 8 5.00 to 6.50 2.74 0.41 2.78 1.44 590
49 17 26 8.00 to 9.50 2.67 0.27 2.71 1.48 480
50 17 41 11.00 to 12.50 2.72 0.20 2.75 1.09 510 23
51 18 12 5.50 to 7.00 2.64 0.45 2.68 1.49 453
52 18 21 8.50 to 10.00 2.58 0.24 2.61 1.20 302
53 18 24 10.00 to 11.50 2.60 0.31 2.64 1.52 377 17
54 19 7 6.00 to 7.50 2.78 0.36 2.82 1.54 604
55 19 16 6.00 to 7.50 2.68 0.22 2.71 1.11 453
56 19 19 7.50 to 9.00 2.76 0.23 2.79 1.03 528 24
57 20 5 4.50 to 6.00 2.65 0.17 2.68 1.12 453
58 20 26 7.50 to 9.00 2.77 0.36 2.80 1.07 754
59 20 39 10.50 to 11.00 2.70 0.53 2.73 1.10 604 27
60 21 3 1.50 to 3.00 2.64 0.14 2.68 1.49 453
Geotechnical Investigation at BPCL, Mahul Noble Geo-Structs Project No. B1102 August 10, 2010
Client : BHARAT PETROLEUM CORPORATION LTD.
Project : Geotechnical investigation for CCR project at Mahul, Mumbai
Sr.
No.
BH
No.
Piece
No.
Depth
(m)
Density
(g/cc)
Water
Absorption
(%)
Specific
Gravity
Porosity
(%)
UCS
(kg/cm2)
Point load
Index
kg/cm2
ROCK PROPERTIES
61 21 16 4.50 to 6.00 2.62 0.20 2.66 1.50 377
62 21 33 7.50 to 9.00 2.61 0.26 2.64 1.14 377 17
63 22 11 4.00 to 5.50 2.72 0.38 2.76 1.45 754
64 22 37 7.00 to 8.50 2.68 0.17 2.72 1.47 604
65 22 55 10.00 to 11.50 2.74 0.31 2.77 1.08 754 34
66 23 10 7.50 to 9.00 2.80 0.31 2.83 1.06 1132
67 23 49 13.50 to 15.00 2.79 0.11 2.82 1.06 905 41
68 23 61 10.50 to 12.00 2.71 0.41 2.75 1.41 754
Geotechnical Investigation at BPCL, Mahul Noble Geo-Structs Project No. B1102 August 10, 2010
CLIENT : BHARAT PETROLEUM CORPORATION LTD.
PROJECT : Geotechnical investigation for CCR project at Mahul, Mumbai
Sr. No. BH No. Sample ID Depth (m) pHChloride
%
Sulphate
%
1 1 DS1 0.50 7.2 0.0586 0.0214
2 2 SPT1 1.50 7.6 0.0692 0.0253
3 3 DS1 0.50 7.4 0.0533 0.0350
4 4 DS1 0.50 7.8 0.6869 0.0312
5 5 SPT1 1.50 7.2 0.0586 0.0273
6 6 DS1 0.50 6.8 0.0426 0.0214
7 7 DS1 0.30 7.4 0.0746 0.0292
8 8 DS1 1.00 7.6 0.0373 0.0234
9 9 SPT1 0.50 7.4 0.0479 0.0331
10 10 UDS1 1.50 7.8 0.0682 0.0323
11 11 SPT1 1.50 7.6 0.0655 0.0310
12 12 UDS1 1.50 7.6 0.0586 0.0331
13 13 DS1 1.00 7.2 0.0533 0.0292
14 14 UDS1 1.50 7.3 0.0639 0.0350
15 15 UDS1 1.50 7.8 0.0746 0.0370
16 16 DS1 0.50 7.2 0.0634 0.0255
17 17 UDS1 1.50 6.8 0.0447 0.0329
18 18 UDS1 1.50 7.6 0.0527 0.0366
19 19 DS1 1.00 6.8 0.0586 0.0339
20 20 UDS1 1.50 7.4 0.0559 0.0315
21 21 DS1 1.00 7.8 0.0415 0.0232
22 22 DS1 1.00 7.2 0.0474 0.0360
23 23 UDS1 1.50 7.6 0.0533 0.0362
Chemical Analysis of Soil
Geotechnical Investigation at BPCL, Mahul Noble Geo-Structs Project No. B1102 August 10, 2010
CLIENT : BHARAT PETROLEUM CORPORATION LTD.
PROJECT : Geotechnical investigation for CCR project at Mahul, Mumbai
Sr.
No.BH No. Depth (m) pH
Chloride
ppm
Sulphate
ppm
1 1 3.20 7.6 284 177
2 2 1.75 7.2 213 195
3 3 1.90 6.8 238 159
4 4 1.55 7.8 249 179
5 5 1.60 7.4 266 248
6 6 1.60 7.6 195 159
7 7 1.50 6.8 209 212
8 8 2.70 7.8 178 195
9 9 1.90 7.6 320 283
10 10 7.10 7.4 316 250
11 11 4.50 7.2 298 262
12 12 2.60 7.8 249 212
13 13 1.90 7.8 320 230
14 14 5.20 7.8 284 177
15 15 3.40 7.8 231 266
16 16 0.90 7.2 241 218
17 17 2.50 6.8 273 235
18 18 2.50 7.6 320 246
19 19 1.30 7.8 288 209
20 20 3.50 7.4 213 204
21 21 2.10 7.8 327 193
22 22 1.50 7.6 192 214
23 23 3.00 7.2 231 225
Chemical Analysis of Water
Geotechnical Investigation at BPCL, Mahul Noble Geo-Structs Project No. B1102 August 10, 2010
Client : BHARAT PETROLEUM CORPORATION LTD.
Project : Geotechnical investigation for CCR project at Mahul, Mumbai
Sr. No. Bh. No. Sample Depth (m) c (kg/cm2) φφφφ (degree)
1 1 DS1 0.50 0.27 9.60
2 2 DS1 1.00 0.28 8.49
3 3 DS1 0.50 0.29 11.34
4 4 DS1 0.50 0.30 10.26
5 5 DS1 1.00 0.24 10.55
6 6 DS1 0.50 0.05 31.61
7 7 DS1 0.30 0.24 12.12
8 8 DS1 1.00 0.12 20.56
9 9 DS1 0.40 0.30 7.12
10 10 UDS1 1.50 0.28 10.28
11 12 UDS1 1.50 0.33 6.27
12 13 DS1 1.00 0.21 15.65
13 14 UDS1 1.50 0.31 10.22
14 15 UDS1 1.50 0.27 10.56
15 16 DS1 0.50 0.20 14.17
16 17 UDS1 1.50 0.00 32.02
17 18 UDS1 1.50 0.00 31.18
18 19 DS1 1.00 0.25 12.84
19 20 UDS1 1.50 0.26 11.46
20 21 DS1 1.00 0.29 9.27
21 22 DS1 1.00 0.24 13.11
22 23 UDS1 1.50 0.22 14.17
Triaxial Shear Test (CD)
Geotechnical Investigation at BPCL, Mahul Noble Geo-Structs Project No. B1102 August 10, 2010
Client : BHARAT PETROLEUM CORPORATION LTD.
Project : Geotechnical investigation for CCR project at Mahul, Mumbai
Sr. No. Bh. No. Sample Depth (m) c (kg/cm2) φφφφ (degree)
1 1 DS1 0.50 0.31 8.12
2 2 DS1 1.00 0.33 7.32
3 3 DS1 0.50 0.30 10.12
4 4 DS1 0.50 0.31 9.16
5 5 DS1 1.00 0.29 8.49
6 6 DS1 0.50 0.10 29.32
7 7 DS1 0.30 0.28 11.67
8 8 DS1 1.00 0.13 18.46
9 9 DS1 0.40 0.35 6.47
10 10 UDS1 1.50 0.26 11.02
11 12 UDS1 1.50 0.31 8.24
12 13 DS1 1.00 0.15 17.22
13 14 UDS1 1.50 0.29 9.53
14 15 UDS1 1.50 0.25 11.66
15 16 DS1 0.50 0.22 13.67
16 17 UDS1 1.50 0.00 31.12
17 18 UDS1 1.50 0.00 30.20
18 19 DS1 1.00 0.30 9.12
19 20 UDS1 1.50 0.30 9.52
20 21 DS1 1.00 0.31 8.33
21 22 DS1 1.00 0.25 11.67
22 23 UDS1 1.50 0.24 12.52
Triaxial Shear Test (UU)
Geotechnical Investigation at BPCL, Mahul Noble Geo-Structs Project No. B1102 August 10, 2010
Client : BHARAT PETROLEUM CORPORATION LTD.
Project : Geotechnical investigation for CCR project at Mahul, Mumbai
Sr. No. Bh. No. SampleDepth
(m)
Free Swell
(%)
Swelling
Pressure
(kg/cm2)
1 1 DS1 0.50 20 Nil
2 2 DS1 1.00 40 Nil
3 3 DS1 0.50 30 Nil
4 4 DS1 0.50 30 Nil
5 5 DS1 1.00 20 Nil
6 6 DS1 0.50 30 Nil
7 7 DS1 0.30 40 Nil
8 8 DS1 1.00 20 Nil
9 9 DS1 0.40 30 Nil
10 10 UDS1 1.50 20 Nil
11 12 UDS1 1.50 20 Nil
12 13 DS1 1.00 40 Nil
13 14 UDS1 1.50 20 Nil
14 15 UDS1 1.50 40 Nil
15 16 DS1 0.50 30 Nil
16 17 UDS1 1.50 40 Nil
17 18 UDS1 1.50 20 Nil
18 19 DS1 1.00 30 Nil
19 20 UDS1 1.50 40 Nil
20 21 DS1 1.00 30 Nil
21 22 DS1 1.00 20 Nil
22 23 UDS1 1.50 40 Nil
Swelling Pressure
Geotechnical Investigation at BPCL, Mahul Noble Geo-Structs Project No. B1102 August 10, 2010
Client : BHARAT PETROLEUM CORPORATION LTD.
Project : Geotechnical investigation for CCR project at Mahul, Mumbai
Sr. No. Bh. No. Sample Depth (m) Cc value
1 2 DS1 1.00 0.26
2 13 DS1 1.00 0.29
Consolidation Test
Geotechnical Investigation at BPCL, Mahul Noble Geo-Structs Project No. B1102 August 10, 2010
Client : BHARAT PETROLEUM CORPORATION LTD.
Project : Geotechnical investigation for CCR project at Mahul, Mumbai
Sr. No. Bh. No. Sample Depth (m) φφφφ (degree) K0 Kp Ka
1 1 DS1 0.50 8.12 0.86 1.33
2 2 DS1 1.00 7.32 0.87 1.29
3 3 DS1 0.50 10.12 0.82 1.43
4 4 DS1 0.50 9.16 0.84 1.38
5 5 DS1 1.00 8.49 0.85 1.35
6 6 DS1 0.50 29.32 - - 0.34
7 7 DS1 0.30 11.67 0.80 1.51
8 8 DS1 1.00 18.46 0.68 1.93
9 9 DS1 0.40 6.47 0.89 1.25
10 10 UDS1 1.50 11.02 0.81 1.47
11 12 UDS1 1.50 8.24 0.86 1.33
12 13 DS1 1.00 17.22 0.70 1.84
13 14 UDS1 1.50 9.53 0.83 1.40
14 15 UDS1 1.50 11.66 0.80 1.51
15 16 DS1 0.50 13.67 0.76 1.62
16 17 UDS1 1.50 31.12 - - 0.32
17 18 UDS1 1.50 30.2 - - 0.33
18 19 DS1 1.00 9.12 0.84 1.38
19 20 UDS1 1.50 9.52 0.83 1.40
20 21 DS1 1.00 8.33 0.86 1.34
21 22 DS1 1.00 11.67 0.80 1.51
22 23 UDS1 1.50 12.52 0.78 1.55
Co efficient of earth pressure
Geotechnical Investigation at BPCL, Mahul Noble Geo-Structs Project No. B1102 August 10, 2010
SAFE BEARING CAPACITY IS EVALUATED FROM SHEAR FAILURE CRITERION.
BH= 8
square s
c= = 1.3 t/sqm
O= ANGLE OF SHEARING RESISTANCE CS = 18 degrees
Df= DEPTH OF FOUNDATION = 1.5 m
r = SATURATED DENSITY = 0.90 t/m3
fs= FACTOR OF SAFETY = 2.5
W'= WATER TABLE CORRECTION = 0.5
α inclination angle = 0
q= OVER BURDEN PRESSURE =r*Df = 1.35 t/m2
B= WIDTH OF FOUNDATION = 6 m
L= LENGTH OF FOUNDATION = ---
√Nφ= tan (π / 4 + φ / 2) = 1.37638192
Nc= = 13.1
Nq= BEARING CAPACITY FACTORS = 5.26
Nγ= BEARING CAPACITY FACTORS = 4.07
Sc= SHAPE FACTOR = 1.3
Sq= SHAPE FACTOR =1+(B/L)*0.2 = 1.2
Sγ= SHAPE FACTOR =1-0.4*(B/L) = 0.8
dc dq dg ic iq ig
1.04 1.018164 1.018164 1 1 1
qult= cNc scdcic + q(Nq - 1) sqdqiq + 0.5 Bγ Nysydyiy W' =
cNc scdcic 1.3 13.1 1.3 1.04 1 22.943246
q(Nq - 1) sqdqiq 1.35 4.26 1.2 1.018 1 7.0265504
0.5 Bγ Nysydyiy W' 0.5 6 0.90 4.07 0.8 0.5 4.4754398
1.018164 1 34.445236
qult= 34.45 T/sqm
WITH FS = 2.5 qns safe= 13.7780946
qns safe= Net Safe Bearing Capcity for 12.65 mm settlement 13.77 T/sqm
Safe Bearing Capacity Calculations
Geotechnical Investigation at BPCL, Mahul Noble Geo-Structs Project No. B1102 August 10, 2010
SAFE BEARING CAPACITY IS EVALUATED FROM SHEAR FAILURE CRITERION.
BH= 20
square s
c= = 3 t/sqm
O= ANGLE OF SHEARING RESISTANCE CS = 9 degrees
Df= DEPTH OF FOUNDATION = 4 m
r = SATURATED DENSITY = 0.90 t/m3
fs= FACTOR OF SAFETY = 2.5
W'= WATER TABLE CORRECTION = 0.5
α inclination angle = 0
q= OVER BURDEN PRESSURE =r*Df = 3.60 t/m2
B= WIDTH OF FOUNDATION = 15 m
L= LENGTH OF FOUNDATION = ---
√Nφ= tan (π / 4 + φ / 2) = 1.17084957
Nc= = 7.92
Nq= BEARING CAPACITY FACTORS = 2.25
Nγ= BEARING CAPACITY FACTORS = 1.03
Sc= SHAPE FACTOR = 1.3
Sq= SHAPE FACTOR =1+(B/L)*0.2 = 1.2
Sγ= SHAPE FACTOR =1-0.4*(B/L) = 0.8
dc dq dg ic iq ig
1.05 1 1 1 1 1
qult= cNc scdcic + q(Nq - 1) sqdqiq + 0.5 Bγ Nysydyiy W' =
cNc scdcic 3 7.92 1.3 1.05 1 32.294978
q(Nq - 1) sqdqiq 3.60 1.25 1.2 1 1 5.4
0.5 Bγ Nysydyiy W' 0.5 15 0.90 1.03 0.8 0.5 2.781
1 1 40.475978
qult= 40.48 T/sqm
WITH FS = 2.5 qns safe= 16.1903913
qns safe= Net Safe Bearing Capcity for 25.36 mm settlement 13.50 T/sqm
Safe Bearing Capacity Calculations
Geotechnical Investigation at BPCL, Mahul Noble Geo-Structs Project No. B1102 August 10, 2010
SAFE BEARING CAPACITY IS EVALUATED FROM SHEAR FAILURE CRITERION.
BH= 22
square s
c= = 2.5 t/sqm
O= ANGLE OF SHEARING RESISTANCE CS = 11 degrees
Df= DEPTH OF FOUNDATION = 1.5 m
r = SATURATED DENSITY = 0.90 t/m3
fs= FACTOR OF SAFETY = 2.5
W'= WATER TABLE CORRECTION = 0.5
α inclination angle = 0
q= OVER BURDEN PRESSURE =r*Df = 1.35 t/m2
B= WIDTH OF FOUNDATION = 6 m
L= LENGTH OF FOUNDATION = ---
√Nφ= tan (π / 4 + φ / 2) = 1.213097
Nc= = 8.8
Nq= BEARING CAPACITY FACTORS = 2.71
Nγ= BEARING CAPACITY FACTORS = 1.44
Sc= SHAPE FACTOR = 1.3
Sq= SHAPE FACTOR =1+(B/L)*0.2 = 1.2
Sγ= SHAPE FACTOR =1-0.4*(B/L) = 0.8
dc dq dg ic iq ig
1.04 1.020608 1.020608 1 1 1
qult= cNc scdcic + q(Nq - 1) sqdqiq + 0.5 Bγ Nysydyiy W' =
cNc scdcic 2.5 8.8 1.3 1.04 1 29.778801
q(Nq - 1) sqdqiq 1.35 1.71 1.2 1.021 1 2.8272894
0.5 Bγ Nysydyiy W' 0.5 6 0.90 1.44 0.8 0.5 1.5872502
1.020608 1 34.193341
qult= 34.19 T/sqm
WITH FS = 2.5 qns safe= 13.6773363
qns safe= Net Safe Bearing Capcity for 12.55 mm settlement 13.68 T/sqm
Safe Bearing Capacity Calculations
Geotechnical Investigation at BPCL, Mahul Noble Geo-Structs Project No. B1102 August 10, 2010
Client : BHARAT PETROLEUM CORPORATION LTD.
Project : Geotechnical investigation for CCR project at Mahul, Mumbai
Depth BH 8 BH 13 BH 12 BH 7
m
0.00
0.50
1.00
1.50
2.00
2.50
3.00
3.50
4.00
4.50 Legend5.00
5.50 Filled up material6.00 Soft clay
6.50 Stiff clay7.00 Very stiff clay
7.50 Loam8.00 Loam with bolders
8.50 Comletely weathered basalt 9.00 Highly weathered basalt
9.50 Moderately weathered basalt10.00 Slightly weathered basalt
10.50 Fresh basalt 11.00
CROSS PROFILE FOR ISBL AREACROSS PROFILE FOR ISBL AREACROSS PROFILE FOR ISBL AREACROSS PROFILE FOR ISBL AREA
Geotechnical Investigation at BPCL, Mahul Noble Geo-Structs Project No. B1102 August 10, 2010
Client : BHARAT PETROLEUM CORPORATION LTD.
Project : Geotechnical investigation for CCR project at Mahul, Mumbai
Depth BH 11 BH 9
m
0.00
0.50
1.00
1.50
2.00
2.50
3.00
3.50
4.00
4.50 Legend5.00
5.50 Filled up material6.00 Soft clay
6.50 Stiff clay7.00 Very stiff clay
7.50 Loam8.00 Loam with bolders
8.50 Comletely weathered basalt 9.00 Highly weathered basalt
9.50 Moderately weathered basalt10.00 Slightly weathered basalt
10.50 Fresh basalt 11.00
11.50
12.00
CROSS PROFILE FOR ISBL AREACROSS PROFILE FOR ISBL AREACROSS PROFILE FOR ISBL AREACROSS PROFILE FOR ISBL AREA
Geotechnical Investigation at BPCL, Mahul Noble Geo-Structs Project No. B1102 August 10, 2010
Client : BHARAT PETROLEUM CORPORATION LTD.
Project : Geotechnical investigation for CCR project at Mahul, Mumbai
Depth BH 3 BH 2 BH 5 BH 14
m
0.00
0.50
1.00
1.50
2.00
2.50
3.00
3.50
4.00
4.50
5.00
5.50
6.00
6.50 Legend7.00
7.50 Filled up material8.00 Soft clay
8.50 Stiff clay9.00 Very stiff clay
9.50 Loam10.00 Loam with bolders
10.50 Comletely weathered basalt 11.00 Highly weathered basalt
11.50 Moderately weathered basalt12.00 Slightly weathered basalt
12.50 Fresh basalt
CROSS PROFILE FOR ISBL AREACROSS PROFILE FOR ISBL AREACROSS PROFILE FOR ISBL AREACROSS PROFILE FOR ISBL AREA
Geotechnical Investigation at BPCL, Mahul Noble Geo-Structs Project No. B1102 August 10, 2010
Client : BHARAT PETROLEUM CORPORATION LTD.
Project : Geotechnical investigation for CCR project at Mahul, Mumbai
Depth BH 16 BH 1 BH 4 BH 6 BH 10 BH 15
m0.00
0.50
1.00
1.50
2.00
2.50
3.00
3.50
4.00
4.50 Legend5.00
5.50 Filled up material6.00 Soft clay6.50 Stiff clay7.00 Very stiff clay
7.50 Loam8.00 Loam with bolders8.50 Comletely weathered basalt 9.00 Highly weathered basalt 9.50 Moderately weathered basalt
10.00 Slightly weathered basalt 10.50 Fresh basalt
11.00
11.50
12.00
12.50
13.00
13.50
14.00
14.50
15.00
CROSS PROFILE FOR ISBL AREACROSS PROFILE FOR ISBL AREACROSS PROFILE FOR ISBL AREACROSS PROFILE FOR ISBL AREA
Geotechnical Investigation at BPCL, Mahul Noble Geo-Structs Project No. B1102 August 10, 2010
Client : BHARAT PETROLEUM CORPORATION LTD.
Project : Geotechnical investigation for CCR project at Mahul, Mumbai
Depth BH 21 BH 22 BH 19
m
0.00
0.50
1.00
1.50
2.00
2.50
3.00
3.50
4.00
4.50 Legend5.00
5.50 Filled up material6.00 Soft clay
6.50 Stiff clay7.00 Very stiff clay
7.50 Loam8.00 Loam with bolders
8.50 Comletely weathered basalt 9.00 Highly weathered basalt
9.50 Moderately weathered basalt10.00 Slightly weathered basalt
10.50 Fresh basalt 11.00
11.50
12.00
CROSS PROFILE FOR ISBL OSBLCROSS PROFILE FOR ISBL OSBLCROSS PROFILE FOR ISBL OSBLCROSS PROFILE FOR ISBL OSBL
Geotechnical Investigation at BPCL, Mahul Noble Geo-Structs Project No. B1102 August 10, 2010
Client : BHARAT PETROLEUM CORPORATION LTD.
Project : Geotechnical investigation for CCR project at Mahul, Mumbai
Depth BH 23 BH 20
m0.00
0.50
1.00
1.50
2.00
2.50
3.00
3.50
4.00
4.50
5.00
5.50
6.00 Legend6.50
7.00 Filled up material7.50 Soft clay8.00 Stiff clay8.50 Very stiff clay9.00 Loam9.50 Loam with bolders10.00 Comletely weathered basalt 10.50 Highly weathered basalt 11.00 Moderately weathered basalt11.50 Slightly weathered basalt 12.00 Fresh basalt 12.50
13.00
13.50
14.00
14.50
15.00
15.50
16.00
16.50
17.00
17.50
18.00
CROSS PROFILE FOR OSBL AREACROSS PROFILE FOR OSBL AREACROSS PROFILE FOR OSBL AREACROSS PROFILE FOR OSBL AREA
Geotechnical Investigation at BPCL, Mahul Noble Geo-Structs Project No. B1102 August 10, 2010
Client : BHARAT PETROLEUM CORPORATION LTD.
Project : Geotechnical investigation for CCR project at Mahul, Mumbai
Depth BH 17 BH 18
m
0.00
0.50
1.00
1.50
2.00
2.50
3.00
3.50
4.00
4.50 Legend5.00
5.50 Filled up material6.00 Soft clay
6.50 Stiff clay7.00 Very stiff clay
7.50 Loam8.00 Loam with bolders
8.50 Comletely weathered basalt 9.00 Highly weathered basalt
9.50 Moderately weathered basalt10.00 Slightly weathered basalt
10.50 Fresh basalt 11.00
11.50
12.00
12.50
CROSS PROFILE FOR OSBL AREACROSS PROFILE FOR OSBL AREACROSS PROFILE FOR OSBL AREACROSS PROFILE FOR OSBL AREA
Geotechnical Investigation Work at BPCL, Mahul Noble Geo-Structs Project No. B 1102 August 10, 2010
EARTH RESISTIVITY TEST (ERT)
EARTH RESISTIVITY TEST (ERT)
Electrical Resistivity tests (ERT) were carried out in the premises of Bharat Petroleum
Corporation Limite, Mahul Village, Mumbai. Vertical Electrical Sounding were carried out
at 6 locations for a depth of 15mtrs in order to ascertain the subsurface geology of the
site.
These tests were carried out in accordance to the methodology specified in IS: 3043.
PRINCIPLE
Observations are made to obtain information on the variation of the physical field in the
vertical section at a given location (sounding). The variation in the physical field is
interpreted in terms of subsurface inhomogenieties which include variation in lithology,
quantity and quality of water. The electrical properties of most rocks are primarily
dependent on the amount of water in the rock. Saturated rocks have lower resistivities
than unsaturated and dry rocks. The higher the porosity of the saturated rock, the lower
its resistivity. The basis of making an electrical sounding is that the further away from a
current source the measurement of the potential the deeper the probing will be.
Geotechnical Investigation Work at BPCL, Mahul Noble Geo-Structs Project No. B 1102 August 10, 2010
CONCLUSIONS:
1. The major formation in the area is basalt. Primary porosity is seen. Secondary
porosity is also seen developed due to fracturing during deposition. The area has thick
soil cover. The area is productive as it contains large openings in definite pervious
horizons, besides being susceptible to weathering.
2. The system of the study area can be visualised as a multi-layered system. The top
most layer which consists of thick soil cover with an average thickness ranging from 3mtr
at ERT-4 to 8mtr at ERT-2. The second layer consists of semi-weathered basalt which
then grades into the basalt.
3. In this area, groundwater occurs in the pore spaces of basalt, under confined and
semi confined conditions. It also occurs in the secondary porosity formed by weathering
of basalt. The groundwater is mainly recharged due to precipitation and seepages. This
is so because the basalt is very compact and also hardens with depth. Groundwater
potential is higher in the water table condition aquifers.
4. Analysis of sounding data reveals that the curves are of Q-type. In these types of
formations there is an gradual drop in resistivity values which indicates that there is
increase in saturation as depth is increasing. It also indicates the presence of water table
condition aquifers at about 3m. It also indicates that the formation grades into compact
basalt with increase in depth.
Geotechnical Investigation Work at BPCL, Mahul Noble Geo-Structs Project No. B 1102 August 10, 2010
ERT - 1 ERT - 2
(Spare yard) (ERU Pump house, next to tank No. 362)
Electrode
spacing
a(m)
K = 2 ¶a(m)Resistance
R(Ω)
Apparent
Resistivity
ρ = (K x R)
(Ωm)
Electrode
spacing
a(m)
K = 2 ¶a(m)Resistance
R(Ω)
Apparent
Resistivity
ρ = (K x R)
(Ωm)
1 6.28 5.21 32.72 1 6.28 0.725 4.55
2 12.56 1.84 23.11 2 12.56 0.283 3.55
3 18.84 1.01 19.03 3 18.84 0.334 6.29
4 25.12 0.654 16.43 4 25.12 0.248 6.23
5 31.40 0.555 17.43 5 31.40 0.173 5.43
6 37.68 0.492 18.54 6 37.68 0.167 6.29
7 43.96 0.380 16.70 7 43.96 0.125 5.50
8 50.24 0.318 15.98 8 50.24 0.105 5.28
9 56.52 0.282 15.94 9 56.52 0.076 4.30
10 62.80 0.239 15.01 10 62.80 0.068 4.27
11 69.08 0.231 15.96 11 69.08 0.056 3.87
12 75.36 0.225 16.96 12 75.36 0.053 3.99
13 81.64 0.225 18.37 13 81.64 0.048 3.92
14 87.92 0.225 19.78 14 87.92 0.042 3.69
15 94.20 0.211 19.88 15 94.20 0.037 3.49
Geotechnical Investigation Work at BPCL, Mahul Noble Geo-Structs Project No. B 1102 August 10, 2010
ERT - 3 ERT - 4
Electrode
spacing
a(m)
K = 2 ¶a(m)Resistance
R(Ω)
Apparent
Resistivity
ρ = (K x R)
(Ωm)
Electrode
spacing
a(m)
K = 2 ¶a(m)Resistance
R(Ω)
Apparent
Resistivity
ρ = (K x R)
(Ωm)
1 6.28 9.55 59.97 1 6.28 3.40 21.35
2 12.56 3.15 39.56 2 12.56 1.60 20.10
3 18.84 1.50 28.26 3 18.84 0.877 16.52
4 25.12 0.838 21.05 4 25.12 0.684 17.18
5 31.40 0.665 20.88 5 31.40 0.594 18.65
6 37.68 0.580 21.85 6 37.68 0.460 17.33
7 43.96 0.496 21.80 7 43.96 0.373 16.40
8 50.24 0.323 16.23 8 50.24 0.329 16.53
9 56.52 0.268 15.15 9 56.52 0.308 17.41
10 62.80 0.242 15.20 10 62.80 0.279 17.52
11 69.08 0.229 15.82 11 69.08 0.252 17.41
12 75.36 0.205 15.45 12 75.36 0.244 18.39
13 81.64 0.189 15.43 13 81.64 0.230 18.78
14 87.92 0.163 14.33 14 87.92 0.210 18.46
15 94.20 0.138 13.00 15 94.20 0.193 18.18
Geotechnical Investigation Work at BPCL, Mahul Noble Geo-Structs Project No. B 1102 August 10, 2010
ERT - 5 ERT - 7
(TDU building) (TDU building)
Electrode
spacing
a(m)
K = 2 ¶a(m)Resistance
R(Ω)
Apparent
Resistivity
ρ = (K x R)
(Ωm)
Electrode
spacing
a(m)
K = 2 ¶a(m)Resistance
R(Ω)
Apparent
Resistivity
ρ = (K x R)
(Ωm)
1 6.28 9.90 62.17 1 6.28 9.55 59.97
2 12.56 5.24 65.81 2 12.56 5.29 66.44
3 18.84 3.07 57.84 3 18.84 3.30 62.17
4 25.12 2.00 50.24 4 25.12 2.34 58.78
5 31.40 1.45 45.53 5 31.40 1.69 53.07
6 37.68 1.13 42.58 6 37.68 1.05 39.56
7 43.96 0.850 37.37 7 43.96 0.659 28.97
8 50.24 0.726 36.47 8 50.24 0.464 23.31
9 56.52 0.596 33.69 9 56.52 0.376 21.25
10 62.80 0.495 31.09 10 62.80 0.328 20.60
11 69.08 0.408 28.18 11 69.08 0.280 19.34
12 75.36 0.340 25.62 12 75.36 0.216 16.28
13 81.64 0.300 24.49 13 81.64 0.208 16.98
14 87.92 0.256 22.51 14 87.92 0.202 17.76
15 94.20 0.198 18.65 15 94.20 0.192 18.09
Geotechnical Investigation at BPCL, Mahul Noble Geo-Structs Project No. B1102 August 10, 2010
APPENDIX A3
GENERAL NOTES
Table 1. Relation between Soil Properties and Penetration Resistance on Basis
of Standard Penetration Test for Sand/Non Plastic Silt According to
Geotechnique journal Vol XXXVI No.3, Sept. 1986.
Relative Density Penetration Value Relative
Density ID %
Very Loose 0 to 4 0-15
Loose 4 to 10 15-35
Medium 10 to 30 35-65
Dense 30 to 50 65-85
Very Dense 50 and above 85-100
Table 2 Relation Between soil properties and Penetration resistance on basis
of Standard Penetration Test for Clay / Plastic Silt.
Consistency Number. of Blows (SPT)
Very Soft 0 to 2
Soft 2 to 4
Medium 4 to 8
Stiff 8 to 15
Very Stiff 15 to 30
Hard 30 and above
Geotechnical Investigation at BPCL, Mahul Noble Geo-Structs Project No. B1102 August 10, 2010
Table 3 Rock quality in terms of Weathering Grades of Rock Mass According to
I.S. 4464.
Terms Description Grade Interpretation
Fresh No visible sign of rock material weathering;
perhaps slight discoloration on major
discontinuity surfaces.
I CR > 60%
Slightly
Weathered
Discoloration indicates weathering of rock
material and discontinuity surfaces. Weathering
may discolour all the rock material.
II CR between 40%
to 60%
Moderately
Weathered
Less than half of the rock material is
decomposed or disintegrated to a soil. Fresh or
discoloured rock is present either as a
continuous framework or as core stones.
III CR between 25%
to 40%
Highly
Weathered
More than half of the rock material is
decomposed or disintegrated to a soil. Fresh or
discoloured rock is present either as a
discontinuous framework or as core stones.
IV CR between 11%
to 25%
Completely
Weathered
All rock material is decomposed and / or
disintegrated to soil. The original mass structure
is still largely intact.
V CR between Zero
to 10%
Residual
Soil
All rock material is converted to soil. The mass
structure and material fabric are destroyed.
There is a large change in volume, but the soil
has not been significantly transported.
VI CR = Zero % But
N > 50
It should be understood that all grades of weathering may not be seen in a given rock mass and
that in some cases a particular grade may be present to a very small extent. Distribution of the
various weathering grades of rock material in the rock mass may be related to the porosity of
the material and the presence of open discontinuities of all types in the rock mass.
Geotechnical Investigation at BPCL, Mahul Noble Geo-Structs Project No. B1102 August 10, 2010
Table 4 Ground Water Limits According to IS 456 - 2000
Test Value
pH 6 to 8
CI ppm 500
SO3 ppm 400